Will AI replace Construction project managers and related professionals?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 97 official task statements scored for Construction project managers and related professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2455), 36% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 48 out of 100 (range 42–54, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

What should someone working in “Construction project managers and related professionals” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 36% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 40% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

UK dataswitch to US

Construction project managers and related professionals

adapting construction schedules and requirements as necessary to align with the construction programme, explaining plans and contract terms to administrative staff and managing project staff to ensure task completion. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and directing construction activities of structures or facilities is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 36%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 40%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 48 out of 100 (42–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 97 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for construction project managers and related professionals is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. The ledger below shows which rows you can move toward.

Your week, as this page understands it

Construction project managers and related professionals manage and oversee major construction and civil engineering projects and major building contracts for quality of work, safety, timeliness and completion within budget, forecast travel patterns and develop strategies for managing the impact of traffic-related demand. The job title says “construction project managers” or “related professionals”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: directing construction activities of structures or facilities. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But construction project managers and related professionals is not one task. It is 97 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is directing construction activities of structures or facilities, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 36%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 40%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
21 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

36 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Adapting construction schedules and requirements as necessary to align with the construction programme
This is reading one thing and writing another: construction schedules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Adapt construction schedules and requirements as necessary to align with the construction programme.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reworking a schedule around the construction programme is planning work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and interpreting data from transport studies
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2455/02
Source: “Analyse and interpret data from transport studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing survey and study data is quantitative work software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports are written from information already recorded, which software does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out rough order of magnitude estimating for project feasibility
This is reading one thing and writing another: rough order of magnitude in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Carry out rough order of magnitude estimating for project feasibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rough order-of-magnitude estimates come from benchmark rates and outline sizes, which suits automatic calculation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

23 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Reading specifications, such as blueprints, to determine construction requirements or to plan procedures
The software now makes the first pass at specifications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Read specifications, such as blueprints, to determine construction requirements or to plan procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading drawings to work out requirements is desk work, though software still misreads construction drawings often.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing computer models to address transport planning issues
The software now makes the first pass at computer models, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2455/02
Source: “Develop computer models to address transport planning issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Specialist transport models need local calibration and expert setup, so generated output needs real reworking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning and coordinating a project from start
The software now makes the first pass at a project, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Plan and coordinate a project from start to finish, including organising the schedule of work, costings and budget.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Programmes, cost plans and budgets follow standard methods, so solid drafts can be produced from project information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

38 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Coordinating project activities with consultants
The value here is that a specific person handles project activities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Coordinate project activities with consultants, subcontractors, and supervisors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Scheduling and chasing can be drafted automatically, but keeping consultants and subcontractors aligned runs on working relationships.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing projects within agreed timescales and budget
The value here is that a specific person handles projects within agreed timescales and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Manage projects within agreed timescales and budget.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Tracking budgets and timescales is easily supported, but keeping a project on track depends on the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out data collection for transport planning solutions
This work happens in the physical world: data collection, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2455/02
Source: “Carry out data collection for transport planning solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Gathering transport data often means counts and surveys carried out in the street, not at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 87 tasks

Estimating budgets and preparing capital expenditure requests for projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Estimate budgets and prepare capital expenditure requests for projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a budget and a capital request from cost data is standard spreadsheet and document work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing and reviewing reports on project progress to ensure compliance with timelines and budgets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Write and review reports on project progress to ensure compliance with timelines and budgets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports follow a fixed shape and are written straight from programme and cost data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling project details and expenses for invoicing upon completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project details in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Compile project details and expenses for invoicing upon completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling costs and details together for a final invoice is routine collation from records already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing statistical data to calculate specific metrics
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Analyse statistical data to calculate specific metrics, such as accident rates for certain demographics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Calculating rates from statistical data is exactly the sort of arithmetic software does faster and more reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing contract documents for building contractors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: contract documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Prepare contract documents for building contractors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building contracts come from standard forms, so first drafts can be produced very reliably, with the manager checking terms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating project timetables to ensure timely completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project timetables in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Create project timetables to ensure timely completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a project programme from tasks, durations and dependencies is scheduling software already does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring project progress to ensure timely completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project progress in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Monitor project progress to ensure timely completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking progress against a plan is well supported by these tools, though chasing delivery involves people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning construction project activities to meet deadlines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: construction project activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Plan construction project activities to meet deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sequencing site activities against deadlines is planning software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing short-term and long-term costs of construction alternatives
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: short-term in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Analyse short-term and long-term costs of construction alternatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing the costs of construction options is spreadsheet analysis software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting conceptual cost estimating for pre-building assessments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: conceptual cost in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Conduct conceptual cost estimating for pre-building assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Early-stage cost estimating works from published rates and outline quantities, which suits automated calculation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining workforce requirements for construction projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: workforce requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Determine workforce requirements for construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out how many people and what trades a programme needs is a calculation from the schedule and drawings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining cost reports to control construction budgets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cost reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Maintain cost reports to control construction budgets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost reporting is spreadsheet work drawn from valuations and orders, which software assembles quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing construction methods and determining cost-effectiveness of plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: construction methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Assess construction methods and determine cost-effectiveness of plans, using computer models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling construction methods and comparing costs is exactly what analysis software is for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing construction budgets comparing sustainable and non-sustainable alternatives
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: construction budgets comparing sustainable in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Develop construction budgets comparing sustainable and non-sustainable alternatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing budgets for sustainable and standard options is cost analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing information from traffic counting programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Analyse information from traffic counting programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning traffic counts into usable figures is a standard calculation done on data already collected.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the strengths, weaknesses and costs of different options
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the strengths, weaknesses and costs of different options in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Assess the strengths, weaknesses and costs of different options.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing options on strengths, weaknesses and cost is structured analysis software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending transport system improvements or projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: transport system improvements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Recommend transport system improvements or projects, based on economic, population, land-use, or traffic projections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommendations built from population, land-use and traffic projections are analysis and writing that software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining information, urban boundaries or classification of roadways
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information, urban boundaries or classification of roadways in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Define information such as urban boundaries or classification of roadways.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Defining boundaries and road classifications is mapping work done against published rules and datasets.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the implications of proposed legislation on local and national levels
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the implications of proposed legislation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Evaluate the implications of proposed legislation on local and national levels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading proposed legislation and working out what it means is document analysis with plenty of source material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting data from traffic modelling software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Interpret data from traffic modelling software, geographic information systems, or associated databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading outputs from modelling software and mapping systems is data interpretation software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing clear reports, presenting options and recommendations on transport systems to clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: clear reports, presenting options and recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Write clear reports, presenting options and recommendations on transport systems to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Option reports with recommendations follow a standard structure and are written well from the underlying analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing transport surveys to identify public concerns
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: transport surveys in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Design transport surveys to identify public concerns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing a survey to find out what people think follows well-documented method and can be drafted directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating traffic management schemes, such as congestion charging and parking controls
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: traffic management schemes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Evaluate traffic management schemes, such as congestion charging and parking controls.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Evaluating a charging or parking scheme is data analysis against published evidence, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing reports for organisations or funding bodies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Write reports for organisations or funding bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reports for funders follow a set structure and are drafted well from the project's own information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing tenders for submission
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tenders in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Prepare tenders for submission.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tenders are largely assembled from standard documents, previous submissions and priced schedules, which suits automated drafting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Securing third-party verification from sources like LEED to ensure responsible design and building activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: third-party verification in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Secure third-party verification from sources like LEED to ensure responsible design and building activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Certification submissions are evidence packs against a published checklist, which software assembles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating transport project costs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: transport project costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Estimate transport project costs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost estimates are built from rates, quantities and past projects, all of which software can assemble.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing development plans for transport system effects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: development plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Review development plans for transport system effects, infrastructure requirements, or compliance with applicable transport regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking development plans against transport rules is document review, which software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing information related to transportation to assess land use policies and environmental impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Analyse information related to transportation to assess land use policies and environmental impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Traffic and land-use analysis works from published data and standard methods, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing infrastructure needs for new developments to support planning applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: infrastructure needs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Assess infrastructure needs for new developments to support planning applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out what infrastructure a development needs follows published standards and can be drafted from the plans.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning projects to ensure timely completion and budget adherence
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Plan projects to ensure timely completion and budget adherence.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a programme that hits dates and budget is planning work with well-established methods.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating effectively with a range of audiences through written reports and presentations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a range of audiences in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Communicate effectively with a range of audiences through written reports and presentations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Written reports and slide decks for different audiences are drafted well, though delivery is still a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Forecasting the impact of new developments like shopping centres
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the impact of new developments like shopping centres, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Forecast the impact of new developments like shopping centres.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Forecasting a development's effects uses established methods, though the local assumptions that decide the answer need an expert.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing their own professional development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at their own professional development, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Manage their own professional development, keeping up to date with technical knowledge and skills, and recording these through CPD records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The record-keeping side is easy to automate, but the point of continuing development is the person's own learning.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing funding bids to secure financial support
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at bids, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Write funding bids to secure financial support.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: AI produces a solid first draft, though a bid that wins needs tailoring to the funder by someone who knows them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and producing transport and traffic system models using digital technologies according to industry standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transport, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Prepare and produce transport and traffic system models using digital technologies according to industry standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Transport models follow industry standards but need expert setting up and calibrating before anyone trusts them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning transport with consideration and application of ethical principles
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transport, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Plan transport with consideration and application of ethical principles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ethical guidance is well documented and can be applied to a draft plan, though the judgement calls stay human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Checking design documents with architects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at design documents, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Check design documents with architects, surveyors and engineers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cross-checking drawings and documents for clashes and gaps is desk work that software does quickly and thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining necessary clearances and licences for operations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at necessary clearances, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Obtain necessary clearances and licences for operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Licence and clearance applications follow published rules and forms, so most of the paperwork can be produced automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting, interpreting and analysing technical information and data
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Collect, interpret, and analyse technical information and data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting and analysing technical data is software's strength, though collecting some of it means going out.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drafting plans for building work
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Draft plans for building work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Draft layouts can be generated, but building drawings need technical judgement and checking before anyone builds from them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing bus facilities as part of transport infrastructure improvements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at bus facilities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Design bus facilities as part of transport infrastructure improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Bus facility layouts follow published guidance, but the design needs an engineer's judgement and sign-off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing quality assurance programmes to ensure project compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quality assurance programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Implement quality assurance programmes to ensure project compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Quality assurance systems are standard and well documented, so the procedures and checks can be drafted readily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining regional or local transport planning problems or priorities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regional, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Define regional or local transport planning problems or priorities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Draft priorities can be written, but deciding what a place actually needs comes from local knowledge and politics.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning transport and travel to influence behaviours and enhance sustainability
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transport, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Plan transport and travel to influence behaviours and enhance sustainability, safety, security, and inclusion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Travel plans can be drafted from published guidance, though shaping local behaviour needs on-the-ground knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing the purchase of supplies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the purchase of supplies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Oversee the purchase of supplies, gear, and equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Procurement paperwork and order tracking are routine admin that software prepares and monitors well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing orders and deliveries of construction materials
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at orders, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Manage orders and deliveries of construction materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Order and delivery management runs on schedules and system data, with someone receiving goods.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting plans and contract terms for owner or developer representatives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Interpret plans and contract terms for owner or developer representatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining what plans and contract clauses mean is document work that software handles well, with the manager checking it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing detailed information to resolve contract disagreements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed information, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Provide detailed information to resolve contract disagreements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Pulling the contract facts together is document work software does well, though settling a dispute involves the parties talking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing new or improved junctions for transport infrastructure
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new or improved junctions, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Design new or improved junctions for transport infrastructure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Junction designs affect road safety, so a qualified engineer has to work them up and stand behind them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Hiring staff for specific project roles
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at staff, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Hire staff for specific project roles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Shortlisting can be largely automated, but hiring decisions turn on meeting people and judging fit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing sustainable transport strategies with professionals at multiple levels
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at sustainable transport strategies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Develop sustainable transport strategies with professionals at multiple levels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Strategy drafts come easily, but building agreement across organisations happens between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting relevant and specific information to key stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles relevant and specific information and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Present relevant and specific information to key stakeholders, staff, and customers within the transport network.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The material can be prepared automatically, but presenting to stakeholders is a person standing up and answering questions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying accident 'black spots' to design road safety improvements
staying human
The ratings behind this row put accident 'black spots' well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Study accident 'black spots' to design road safety improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Accident data analysis is straightforward, but designing the fix needs site knowledge and engineering judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Work on projects, often from the initial idea through to design, completion and review
staying human
The ratings behind this row put projects, often well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Work on projects, often from the initial idea through to design, completion and review.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (20–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Carrying a project from first idea to completion covers a wide mix of work, much of it involving other people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Resolving complex transportation design issues with engineers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles complex transportation design issues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Resolve complex transportation design issues with engineers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Untangling a difficult design problem happens through engineers working it through together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting meetings with project staff for progress updates
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles meetings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Conduct meetings with project staff for progress updates.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Agendas and minutes can be produced automatically, but a progress meeting works through people talking to each other.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing teams, contractors and suppliers on project tasks and deliverables
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles teams, contractors and suppliers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Direct teams, contractors, and suppliers on project tasks and deliverables.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Instructions and deliverable lists can be drafted, but directing contractors happens through conversation and follow-up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining plans and contract terms to administrative staff
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles plans and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Explain plans and contract terms to administrative staff, workers, or clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining plans and contract terms lands better when a person walks people through it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing plans and strategies to improve the efficiency and value of commercial transport environments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles plans and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Implement plans and strategies to improve the efficiency and value of commercial transport environments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Improvement plans can be drafted, but making them stick in a working transport operation means leading people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating with developers for project execution
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles developers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Negotiate with developers for project execution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Negotiating with a developer turns on trust and give-and-take between the individuals at the table.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Discussing and resolving construction problems in consultation with supervisory personnel
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles construction problems and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Discuss and resolve construction problems in consultation with supervisory personnel, owners, contractors, or design professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Resolving site problems runs on people around a table agreeing what to do next.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Contracting craft workers for specific projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles craft workers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Contract craft workers for specific projects such as painting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Engaging subcontractors runs on relationships and known track records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring safe systems of work
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: safe systems of work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Ensure safe systems of work are applied, hazards and risks are identified and mitigated in their own work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Risk assessments can be drafted from templates, but spotting the real hazards means looking at the actual workplace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing project staff to ensure task completion
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Manage project staff to ensure task completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Task tracking is easy to automate, but getting work finished through people rests on the manager's relationship with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing plans for new transport systems
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Design plans for new transport systems including airports and motorways.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Designing an airport or motorway layout needs a chartered engineer's judgement, and machines produce only starting points.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating with planning and highways authorities for project approval
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles planning and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Negotiate with planning and highways authorities for project approval.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting an approval out of a highways authority rests on a working relationship with the officers involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out environmental impact assessments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental impact assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2455/02
Source: “Carry out environmental impact assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Impact assessments need site survey work and a qualified assessor putting their name to the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring compliance with construction contracts and client quality standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2455/01
Source: “Monitor compliance with construction contracts and client quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Contract terms and quality records can be checked automatically, but confirming what was actually built needs someone on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing and supervising the day-to-day operational activities of a passenger transport environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the day-to-day operational activities of a passenger transport, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Manage and supervise the day-to-day operational activities of a passenger transport environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running day-to-day passenger operations means being at the depot or station dealing with staff and incidents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining and promoting workplace health and safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workplace health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Maintain and promote workplace health and safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Method statements and risk paperwork draft easily, but promoting safe behaviour needs a person walking the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Addressing unexpected issues during construction project execution
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unexpected issues during construction project execution, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Address unexpected issues during construction project execution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Problems on a live site are half solved by seeing what has actually happened and talking it through on the spot.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Activelying support team members to maximise potential in their role and identifying opportunities for development
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles support team members and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Actively support team members to maximise potential in their role and identify opportunities for development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Developing colleagues depends on knowing them and earning their confidence over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating modifications with architects and consulting engineers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles modifications and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2455/01
Source: “Negotiate modifications with architects and consulting engineers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (12–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reaching agreement on design changes depends on trust and give-and-take between people who work together repeatedly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting at planning committees to discuss development proposals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: planning committees, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Present at planning committees to discuss development proposals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Presenting to a planning committee means a person in the room taking questions from councillors.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing others by prioritising and delegating tasks to meet project objectives
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Develop others by prioritising and delegating tasks to meet project objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Bringing people on by giving them the right work depends on knowing them and their ambitions personally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing site inspections to monitor project progress and adherence to contracts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Oversee site inspections to monitor project progress and adherence to contracts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Progress against contract is judged by seeing the work in place, which means being on the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with residents' groups to address concerns
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles residents' groups and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Liaise with residents' groups to address concerns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Residents want to be heard by a person who can answer for the project, not by a system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing safety checks on construction sites to ensure compliance with safety regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: safety checks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Oversee safety checks on construction sites to ensure compliance with safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Safety oversight on a live site means walking it and seeing conditions, with a named competent person responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with stakeholders during public consultations to gather feedback
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: stakeholders during public consultations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Engage with stakeholders during public consultations to gather feedback.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Public consultation means turning up, listening to people and being seen to take them seriously.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Facilitating consensus on project designs in public consultations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: consensus, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2455/02
Source: “Facilitate consensus on project designs in public consultations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a room of residents to agree on a design depends on trust built face to face at the meeting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Representing jurisdictions in obtaining legislative or administrative approval for land development projects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: jurisdictions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Represent jurisdictions in obtaining legislative or administrative approval for land development projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Representing an authority for approval means a named professional appearing and answering for the case.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising construction teams to meet project specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction teams, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Supervise construction teams to meet project specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising trades on site means being there, seeing the work and directing people face to face.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing on-site quality control
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site quality control, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Oversee on-site quality control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking the quality of work as it is built means being on site looking at it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising construction projects to ensure compliance with building regulations and project specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2455/01
Source: “Supervise construction projects to ensure compliance with building regulations and project specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Someone competent has to be on site and legally answerable for the work meeting building rules.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing construction activities of structures or facilities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction activities of structures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2455/01
Source: “Direct construction activities of structures or facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing work on a live construction site means being there to see and decide what happens next.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Serving as an expert witness at public inquiries and planning appeals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: an expert witness, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2455/02
Source: “Serve as an expert witness at public inquiries and planning appeals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: An expert witness gives evidence in person and is personally accountable for it under oath.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £47,700a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 115,700in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders and adapting construction schedules and requirements as necessary to align with the construction programme. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where construction activities of structures get done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders is going; directing construction activities of structures or facilities is not.

So, given all that: 36% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 24% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 40% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 97 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (directing construction activities of structures or facilities) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles directing construction activities of structures or facilities, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to construction project managers and related professionals (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was production managers and directors in construction: only about 12% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 36/64: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “coordinate project activities with consultants, subcontractors, and supervisors”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Production managers and directors in construction
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “maintain and promote workplace health and safety”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 11% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 11% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Architects
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “supervise construction projects to ensure compliance with building regulations and project specifications”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 9% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 9% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Quantity surveyors
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already coordinate project activities with consultants, subcontractors, and supervisors, and their equivalent is to manage the work of subcontractors to ensure quality control. Across both published task lists that is about 5% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 36% of its task weight, across 97 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

If you run a team doing this job

If you run a team doing this job, the conversation you owe them is the one on this page, and sooner than feels comfortable. Show them the ledger rather than a reassurance: the rows moving toward the software are writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders, and the rows that are not are where you want your people visible. Ask each of them to do the this-week move and bring the list to your next one-to-one. It turns a rumour into a piece of work, and it tells you which parts of your team's week are actually at stake. And say the thing out loud that a team lead usually leaves unsaid: a shrinking team is your exposure too, so do the move yourself as well.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Construction Managers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other

In US official statistics this job is counted as Construction Managers and Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for construction project managers / related professionals, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 36% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for construction project managers / related professionals. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for construction project managers / related professionals launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for construction project managers / related professionals yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for construction project managers / related professionals existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for construction project managers / related professionals launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Construction project managers and related professionals?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 97 official task statements scored for Construction project managers and related professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2455), 36% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 48 out of 100 (range 42–54, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Construction project managers and related professionals” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders” (93/100, very high); “Estimate budgets and prepare capital expenditure requests for projects” (93/100, very high); “Write and review reports on project progress to ensure compliance with timelines and budgets” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Construction project managers and related professionals” stay human?: About 40% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Serve as an expert witness at public inquiries and planning appeals” (4/100, minimal); “Direct construction activities of structures or facilities” (5/100, minimal); “Supervise construction projects to ensure compliance with building regulations and project specifications” (6/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Construction project managers and related professionals” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 36% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 40% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Construction project managers and related professionals calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 97 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
21 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.