Will AI replace Legal professionals n.e.c.?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 146 official task statements scored for Legal professionals n.e.c. (United Kingdom, SOC 2419), 40% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 53 out of 100 (range 47–60, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Legal professionals n.e.c.” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain accurate records” (88/100, very high); “Search public records for transactions such as sales, leases, and assessments” (88/100, very high); “Draft sales or service contracts for products or services” (88/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Legal professionals n.e.c.” stay human?

About 27% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Represent clients in litigation proceedings at the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC)” (4/100, minimal); “Exercise IP litigation rights in court” (4/100, minimal); “Represent clients in court proceedings” (4/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Legal professionals n.e.c.” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 40% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 27% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Legal professionals n.e.c. calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 146 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Legal professionals n.e.c.

applying for patents from the Intellectual Property Office, providing advice on legal procedures and related issues and taking action on trademark infringement and passing. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: managing legal files and utilising client case management and accounting systems is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and interviewing clients and witnesses is work it can't touch.

Your move: what a legal professionals n.e.c. can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 40%
changing shape: 33%
staying human: 27%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 53 out of 100 (47–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 146 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for legal professionals n.e.c. is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. The ledger below shows which rows you can move toward.

Your week, as this page understands it

Job holders in this unit group perform a variety of other professional legal occupations not elsewhere classified in minor group 241: Legal professionals. The job title says “legal professionals n.e.c.”. The real job is the part underneath: interviewing clients and witnesses. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But legal professionals n.e.c. is not one task. It is 146 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is interviewing clients and witnesses, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 40%
changing shape: 33%
staying human: 27%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

2 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

60 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Managing legal files and utilising client case management and accounting systems
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal files in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01, 2419/02
Source: “Manage legal files and utilise client case management and accounting systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Case management and accounting systems are built for this, so most of it is already software work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out searches to see if a proposed trade mark already exists
This is reading one thing and writing another: searches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/04
Source: “Carry out searches to see if a proposed trade mark already exists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking whether a mark already exists is a search across public registers, which computers do quickly and thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching legal records and case law
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/02
Source: “Research legal records and case law.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Case law and public records are searchable, so research comes back fast, with the professional checking every source.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring, and applying changesing in intellectual property law
This is reading one thing and writing another: intellectual property law in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/04
Source: “Monitor and apply changes in intellectual property law.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking changes in published law and summarising them is reading-and-writing work that current tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

48 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Reviewing legal documents for accuracy and compliance with relevant laws
The software now makes the first pass at legal documents, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/02, 2419/03, 2419/04
Source: “Review legal documents for accuracy and compliance with relevant laws.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Document checking against legal requirements is systematic work software does well, with a qualified person answerable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying for patents from the Intellectual Property Office
The software now makes the first pass at patents, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2419/04
Source: “Apply for patents from the Intellectual Property Office (IPO)and the European Patent Office (EPO).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Patent filing follows published procedures and forms, but the application is prosecuted by a registered attorney.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing scientific documents and patents to assess an invention's novelty and innovation
The software now makes the first pass at scientific documents, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2419/04
Source: “Analyse scientific documents and patents to assess an invention's novelty and innovation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether an invention is genuinely new needs technical and legal expertise; tools narrow the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

38 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Interviewing clients and witnesses
The value here is that a specific person handles clients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2419/02, 2419/03, 2419/04
Source: “Interview clients and witnesses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviews depend on live rapport and reading people, which software cannot do for you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing and advancing legal cases and transactions according to legal protocols
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for legal cases, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2419/02
Source: “Manage and advance legal cases and transactions according to legal protocols.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Moving matters forward within legal rules needs a qualified professional steering each step, with tools tracking it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing and verifying bases for legal proceedings with colleagues specialised in relevant legal areas
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for bases, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2419/02
Source: “Establish and verify bases for legal proceedings with colleagues specialised in relevant legal areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Settling the legal basis for a case is done with specialist colleagues, each answerable for their part.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 136 tasks

Maintaining accurate records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2419/01
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping case records accurate and up to date is routine work that systems do reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Searching public records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: public records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2419/01
Source: “Search public records for transactions such as sales, leases, and assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Public registers are searchable databases, so looking up sales, leases and assessments is quick, reliable computer work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Drafting sales or service contracts for products or services
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: sales in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Draft sales or service contracts for products or services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standard commercial contracts follow well-known templates, so a usable first draft is routine, with a lawyer reviewing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Sending terms of engagement
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: terms of engagement in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/01
Source: “Send terms of engagement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Terms of engagement are standard documents assembled from templates, needing only the client's details filling in.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing legal documents to assist solicitors and lawyers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/03
Source: “Prepare legal documents to assist solicitors and lawyers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing legal documents from precedents is template work, and a solicitor reviews the draft before it is used.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Composing letters as part of office duties
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: letters in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Compose letters as part of office duties.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Routine office letters are exactly what these tools write well, needing only a quick check before sending.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Producing first drafts of legal documents using digital tools
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: first drafts of legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Produce first drafts of legal documents using digital tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: First drafts from precedents are exactly what writing tools do best, with a lawyer editing before anything is sent.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Proofreading legal documents to ensure accuracy and clarity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Proofread legal documents to ensure accuracy and clarity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking documents for errors and clarity is careful text comparison, which software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Proofreading documents under supervision using digital tools
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documents under supervision in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Proofread documents under supervision using digital tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Proofreading with digital tools is text checking, which software does faster and more consistently than tired eyes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Transcribing legal opinions for case documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal opinions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Transcribe legal opinions for case documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning spoken legal opinions into written text is transcription, a job speech software now does very accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Handling renewals of trade mark and designing registrations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: renewals of trade mark in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Handle renewals of trade mark and design registrations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Renewals are deadline and fee administration against published schedules, which reminder systems already handle.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Meeting all application and renewal deadlines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: all application in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2419/04
Source: “Meet all application and renewal deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deadlines and renewal dates are fixed and published, so tracking and prompting them is exactly what reminder systems do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Managing diaries for various administrative and supporting roles
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: diaries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Manage diaries for various administrative and support roles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 85 out of 100 (81–89 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Diary and appointment management is exactly the kind of scheduling software already does better than people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Prioritising workloads using management information systems and technology
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: workloads in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Prioritise workloads using management information systems and technology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Prioritising work from case data is exactly what management systems are designed to do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Searching computer databases, credit reports, public records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer databases, credit reports, public records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Search computer databases, credit reports, public records, tax or legal filings, or other resources to locate persons or to compile information for investigations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Searching databases and public records is fast, thorough computer work, with the professional judging what matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Collating and sending supporting legal and financial documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Collate and send supporting legal and financial documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering the right documents and sending them on is list-and-file work that software handles once the checklist is set.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Entering data into record-keeping systems to create or update title records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Enter data into record-keeping systems to create or update title records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Typing title details into a records system is structured data entry with clear formats and checks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing lists of all legal documents applying to a specific piece of land and the buildings on it
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: lists of all legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare lists of all legal documents applying to a specific piece of land and the buildings on it.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Listing the documents that affect a piece of land is compiling work from records already held digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing fees related to registration of property-related documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: fees in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Assess fees related to registration of property-related documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out registration fees is arithmetic against a published fee schedule.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Dealing with apportionments of rent and service charges for a leasehold property
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: apportionments of rent in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Deal with apportionments of rent and service charges for a leasehold property.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Splitting rent and service charges between buyer and seller is date-and-money arithmetic with clear rules.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing property completion statements, using knowledge and expertise in property procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: property completion statements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare property completion statements, using knowledge and expertise in property procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A completion statement is arithmetic on figures already known, which is exactly what accounting software is built for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reading search requests to ascertain types of title evidence required and to obtain descriptions of properties and names of involved parties
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: search requests in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Read search requests to ascertain types of title evidence required and to obtain descriptions of properties and names of involved parties.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading a search request to work out what is needed is structured comprehension of a standard form.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing rejection notices when documents are not acceptable
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: rejection notices in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare rejection notices when documents are not acceptable.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rejection notices follow set wording and set reasons, making them easy to produce once the fault is identified.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sending estimates of fees and disbursements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: estimates of fees in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/01
Source: “Send estimates of fees and disbursements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Fee estimates come from published scales and standard disbursements, so producing and sending them is routine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing correspondence to inform concerned parties of licensing decisions or appeals processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: correspondence in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/02
Source: “Prepare correspondence to inform concerned parties of licensing decisions or appeals processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Decision letters follow set formats and standard wording, so drafting them is routine for software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling litigation bundles for court cases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: litigation bundles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2419/03
Source: “Compile litigation bundles for court cases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a court bundle is indexing, paginating and cross-referencing, which bundling software already does end to end.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Completing official documentation for cases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: official documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2419/03
Source: “Complete official documentation for cases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Court and case forms have fixed fields filled from the file, making completion a structured data task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Organising case files for legal proceedings to support legal professionals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: case files in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2419/03
Source: “Organise case files for legal proceedings to support legal professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Organising and indexing case files is document management that software handles once the filing structure is set.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing procedural details of trade mark and designing registrations both in the UK and internationally
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: procedural details of trade mark in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Oversee procedural details of trade mark and design registrations both in the UK and internationally.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Registration procedure is a series of deadlines and forms, which docketing software already tracks and prompts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Demonstrating a thorough understanding of legal principles applicable to conveyancing using plain English
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a thorough understanding of legal principles applicable in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Demonstrate a thorough understanding of legal principles applicable to conveyancing using plain English.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 74 out of 100 (67–81 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Explaining property law in everyday words draws on published rules, and writing tools are unusually good at plain-English explanation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Summarising legal or insurance details from reference books for examinations or as evidence
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/01
Source: “Summarise legal or insurance details from reference books for examinations or as evidence.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling key points out of reference material is summarising work that current tools do well, with a lawyer checking it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing, researching and summarising legal information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/03
Source: “Analyse, research and summarise legal information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legal research and summarising are strong points for these tools, with the professional checking the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assisting in preparing legal documents and researching to support the provision of legal advice by professionals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: preparing legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/03
Source: “Assist in preparing legal documents and research to support the provision of legal advice by professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting documents and researching points of law suits current tools well, though every citation must be checked by a lawyer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Completing routine legal research and presenting information in response to requests from others under supervision
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: routine legal research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/03
Source: “Complete routine legal research and present information in response to requests from others under supervision.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Routine research draws on published law, but made-up references are a real risk so a supervisor must verify the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing legal briefs for court cases to support legal teams
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal briefs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/03
Source: “Prepare legal briefs for court cases to support legal teams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Briefs follow a familiar structure and draw on published law, though the argument still needs a lawyer's shaping and checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching and drafting legal documents to support solicitors and lawyers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/03
Source: “Research and draft legal documents to support solicitors and lawyers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching and drafting for a solicitor suits current tools well, as long as every reference is verified before use.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing legal contracts to protect intellectual property rights
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal contracts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/04
Source: “Prepare legal contracts to protect intellectual property rights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: IP contracts start from precedents, but the commercial terms are negotiated and need a lawyer to finalise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Ensuring deadlines are met
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: deadlines are met in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2419/04
Source: “Ensure deadlines are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deadline tracking suits systems well; chasing people to actually act is the human part.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing legal documents for property transactions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare legal documents for property transactions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Property paperwork follows fixed forms, but UK rules reserve much of this work to an authorised conveyancer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Comparing legal descriptions of properties to local authority records to verify them
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal descriptions of properties in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/01
Source: “Compare legal descriptions of properties to local authority records to verify them.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing a property description against council records is document-matching work, and a solicitor still signs off the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting searches with local authorities for factors affecting sales
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: searches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/01
Source: “Conduct searches with local authorities for factors affecting sales.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Local authority searches are ordered and returned electronically, so the routine reading of them is desk work checked by a lawyer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining titles to property to determine validity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: titles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2419/01
Source: “Examine titles to property to determine validity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Most registered titles are digital and standard, so checking them is document work, though odd entries still need a lawyer's eye.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating and verifying the legal ownership of land and property
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the legal ownership of land in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Investigate and verify the legal ownership of land and property.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ownership is recorded in a public digital register, so checking who owns land is largely a lookup and comparison job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Copying or summarising recorded documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recorded documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Copy or summarise recorded documents, such as mortgages, trust deeds, and contracts, that affect property titles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Summarising deeds and mortgages is document work that current tools do well, with a lawyer reading the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports describing title encumbrances encountered during searches and actions needed to clear titles
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports describing title encumbrances encountered during searches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare reports describing title encumbrances encountered during searches and actions needed to clear titles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up what the searches found follows a familiar structure, though judging what must be cleared needs legal experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Searching legal records, survey records and land titles to obtain information about property boundaries in areas
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal records, survey records and land titles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Search legal records, survey records, and land titles to obtain information about property boundaries in areas to be surveyed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Title and boundary records are digital and searchable, making this largely a retrieval task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Organizing work in adherence to rigorous legal processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/01
Source: “Organize work in adherence to rigorous legal processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following set legal procedures is rule-based work that systems structure well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring regulatory rules or changes are communicated through company policies and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory rules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/02
Source: “Ensure regulatory rules or changes are communicated through company policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning rule changes into policy wording is documented drafting work software does well, checked by the professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting detailed research on specific legal matters to support case preparation and advice
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/03
Source: “Conduct detailed research on specific legal matters to support case preparation and advice.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Research on a specific legal matter drafts well from published sources, with the professional verifying it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling evidence for legal investigations and court proceedings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: evidence in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2419/03
Source: “Compile evidence for legal investigations and court proceedings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and organising documents into an evidence bundle suits software, with the professional checking relevance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering digital systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: digital systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Administer digital systems to create, maintain and use client and organisation data securely in line with legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running client data systems securely is standard IT administration governed by published data protection rules.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing casework to ensure progression is maintained and problems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: casework in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Review casework to ensure progression is maintained and problems are identified and escalated.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing whether files are moving is checking dates and steps against a process, which case systems already track.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging for title searches of properties being sold
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: title searches of properties being sold in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Arrange for title searches of properties being sold.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ordering and reviewing property searches is standard, largely digital conveyancing work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting information to evaluate the originality of an invention
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Collect information to evaluate the originality of an invention.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Prior-art searching is database work that tools do quickly and thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing paper and electronic filing systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: paper in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Manage paper and electronic filing systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Electronic filing is straightforward software work, though paper files still need handling by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Advising overseas solicitors on foreign patent application processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: overseas solicitors in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Advise overseas solicitors on foreign patent application processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (54–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Foreign filing procedures are published in detail, so explaining them to another firm is largely reference work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing transfer documents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transfer documents, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare transfer documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Transfer forms are highly standardised, yet UK law reserves preparing them to solicitors and licensed conveyancers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Completing conveyancing tasks online using a computerised case management system
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at tasks online, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Complete conveyancing tasks online using a computerised case management system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Case management systems already automate much of the process, but conveyancing itself may only be carried out by an authorised firm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining whether land-related documents can be registered under relevant legislation like the Land Registration Act
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at this work, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Determine whether land-related documents can be registered under relevant legislation like the Land Registration Act.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Registration rules are published and testable, but deciding a document can be registered is a judgement an authorised person owns.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and issuing title commitments and insurance policies based on title search results
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at title commitments, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare and issue title commitments and insurance policies based on title search results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Title insurance follows underwriting rules that can be applied automatically, but issuing a policy needs an authorised insurer's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing property leases to facilitate legal transactions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at property leases, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Prepare property leases to facilitate legal transactions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Leases start from standard precedents, but the terms are negotiated and preparing them is reserved to authorised professionals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying and examining accuracy of closing documents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at accuracy of closing documents, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Verify and examine accuracy of closing documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking completion papers against requirements is systematic work software does well, with a qualified person responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Exchanging title-related information with estate agents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at title-related information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Exchange title-related information with estate agents, lending institutions, and courthouse personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Passing title information between agents, lenders and courts is routine correspondence, though chasing replies still takes a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting enquiries to gather information as requested by clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at enquiries, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2419/01
Source: “Conduct enquiries to gather information as requested by clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering a client's enquiry means gathering documented facts, though clients often want to talk it through with someone.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining financial records to ensure accuracy and compliance with regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at financial records, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2419/01
Source: “Examine financial records to ensure accuracy and compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking records against rules suits software, though a qualified person signs off the compliance view.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Following specific project or task instructions provided by clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific project, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2419/01
Source: “Follow specific project or task instructions provided by clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following a client's stated instructions is structured work, though clarifying what they actually want usually needs a conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting law or regulation violations to appropriate boards or agencies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at law, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/02
Source: “Report law or regulation violations to appropriate boards or agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reporting duties follow written rules, but the professional making the report is personally answerable for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drafting and finalising legal documents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at legal documents, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2419/03
Source: “Draft and finalise legal documents, including wills and contracts, for clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Drafting wills and contracts is not restricted in the UK, but finalising them carries the professional's responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Handling personal, confidential and sensitive information with strict adherence to legal and organisational confidentiality policies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at personal, confidential and sensitive information, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/03
Source: “Handle personal, confidential, and sensitive information with strict adherence to legal and organisational confidentiality policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handling sensitive material follows written rules that systems enforce well, with a qualified person accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Escalating problems in accordance with organisational policies and procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at problems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Escalate problems in accordance with organisational policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Escalation routes are written down in policy, though judging when a problem is serious usually means speaking to someone.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing the law library, ensuring resources are current and easily accessible
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the law library, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Manage the law library, ensuring resources are current and easily accessible.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping legal resources current is largely catalogue and subscription work, though physical books still need shelving.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing paralegal activities to support the organisation's commercial strategy
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at paralegal activities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Perform paralegal activities to support the organisation's commercial strategy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: General paralegal support is mostly document and research work, though it depends on the firm's own priorities and people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing detailed case reports for legal and social services
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed case reports, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Write detailed case reports for legal and social services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Case reports follow familiar structures and draft well, with the professional answerable for the conclusions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with UK and overseas registration authorities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at UK, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Liaise with UK and overseas registration authorities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Correspondence with registries follows set forms and rules, though queries still need someone to chase them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing the transfer of trademark ownership
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the transfer of trademark ownership, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Manage the transfer of trademark ownership.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording a change of trade mark owner is form-filing against a public register, with details taken from the deal.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping buyers and sellers up to date with progress of a sale
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at buyers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Keep buyers and sellers up to date with progress of a sale.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress updates can be generated from the case file, though buyers and sellers value hearing it from someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on protecting design rights
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2419/04
Source: “Provide advice on protecting design rights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Design law is published and clear, but advising a client on protecting a design is regulated professional work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Investigating facts and law of cases to determine causes of action
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at facts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2419/03
Source: “Investigate facts and law of cases to determine causes of action.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling the facts together needs real-world digging; the legal analysis on top drafts more easily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring all transactions and activities are carried out safely and securely to protect the organisation from threats
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at all transactions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Ensure all transactions and activities are carried out safely and securely to protect the organisation from threats such as fraud and cybercrime, under the guidance of senior colleagues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Fraud and security checks follow set procedures that software supports, with senior colleagues signing off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Filing legible court case transcripts with the court clerk's office
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at legible court case transcripts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “File legible court case transcripts with the court clerk's office.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Court filing is moving online and is largely form-based, though some documents still have to be delivered in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing detailed technical descriptions of inventions in precise legal terms
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed technical descriptions of inventions, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2419/04
Source: “Write detailed technical descriptions of inventions in precise legal terms (patent drafts) to meet the correct legal standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Millions of published patents give plenty to learn from, but claim wording decides how much protection a client gets.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Corresponding with clients and opposing solicitors
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Correspond with clients and opposing solicitors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Correspondence drafts well, but each letter commits the firm and needs a qualified person's approval.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in conducting 'Know Your Client' activities to ensure appropriate legal services
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at conducting 'know your client' activities, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Assist in conducting 'Know Your Client' activities to ensure appropriate legal services are provided.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Identity and background checks are already largely automated, but anti-money-laundering rules make a named person responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on conflicting trade mark applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at conflicting trade mark applications, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2419/04
Source: “Advise on conflicting trade mark applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Conflict searches are database work, though advising which conflict matters is a registered attorney's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Handling licensing agreements for trademarks
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at agreements, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Handle licensing agreements for trademarks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Licence documents follow familiar patterns, but the royalty and scope terms are negotiated by a qualified attorney.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing the assignment of patents during sales or transfers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the assignment of patents during sales, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Manage the assignment of patents during sales or transfers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assignment paperwork is standard, but checking what is actually being transferred needs an attorney's review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on the legal aspects of marketing new goods or services for their market introduction
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the legal aspects of marketing new goods, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2419/04
Source: “Advise on the legal aspects of marketing new goods or services for their market introduction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Advertising and labelling rules are published, but signing off a launch is regulated advice a qualified person gives.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drafting sales contracts and agree terms with the conveyancer
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at sales contracts, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2419/01
Source: “Draft sales contracts and agree terms with the conveyancer.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Sale contracts use standard conditions that draft easily, but agreeing the final terms is a negotiation between two firms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising clients about buying a home
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Advise clients about buying a home, including market trends and legal considerations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Market and legal information is easy to assemble, but buyers want a person to answer their worries.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Handling and responding to client and third-party inquiries with confidence
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at client, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Handle and respond to client and third-party inquiries with confidence.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Standard replies are easy to draft, but clients and other firms often want a confident person on the other end.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on developing brand enlargement strategies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at developing brand enlargement strategies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/04
Source: “Advise on developing brand enlargement strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Brand expansion advice draws on published law and market data, but clients want it argued through with an adviser.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating the value of patents for clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the value of patents, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2419/04
Source: “Estimate the value of patents for clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Valuing a patent depends on market and licensing facts that are mostly private and specific to that business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring compliance with governing bodies' requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at compliance, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2419/01
Source: “Ensure compliance with governing bodies' requirements, rules, and regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rules are published and checkable, but responsibility for a firm's compliance sits with named, regulated individuals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing measures to safeguard against anti-money laundering activities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at measures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2419/01
Source: “Implement measures to safeguard against anti-money laundering activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Money-laundering checks follow prescribed procedures software supports, with a named officer answerable for them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing the financial aspects of business transactions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the financial aspects of business transactions, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Manage the financial aspects of business transactions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handling client money is heavily rule-bound and the responsibility sits with named, regulated individuals in the firm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Demonstrating commercial awareness and identifying new opportunities for business growth and improvement
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at commercial awareness, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2419/01
Source: “Demonstrate commercial awareness and identify new opportunities for business growth and improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting new business opportunities depends on knowing this firm, its clients and its local market, which is rarely written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating irregularities and non-compliance issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at irregularities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2419/02
Source: “Investigate irregularities and non-compliance issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investigations combine document analysis, which software supports, with judgement about what has gone wrong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing responses to reports from patent examiners
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at responses, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Prepare responses to reports from patent examiners.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Drafting a reply to an examiner needs a patent specialist's strategy; tools give a rough first attempt.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Suggesting modifications or extensions to the definition of the invention
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at modifications, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2419/04
Source: “Suggest modifications or extensions to the definition of the invention.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Redrafting what the invention covers decides the value of the patent, and that craft sits with experienced attorneys.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing support to licensed conveyancers in legal office environment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at support, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Provide support to licensed conveyancers in legal office environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Supporting a conveyancer covers routine document and system work, though some of it means being in the office.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing support to solicitors and barristers if a case goes to court
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at support, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2419/04
Source: “Provide support to solicitors and barristers if a case goes to court.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Court support is largely bundles, documents and logistics, though some of it means being at the hearing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating courteously with customers via telephone
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles customers via telephone and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2419/01
Source: “Communicate courteously with customers via telephone, email, letter, and face-to-face.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written contact is easy to draft, but courteous handling of a worried client often means a call or a meeting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on legal procedures and related issues
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for advice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2419/02
Source: “Provide advice on legal procedures and related issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Procedure is documented and easy to explain, but advising a client on their situation is regulated professional work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing clients with specific legal information relevant to their case
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for clients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2419/03
Source: “Provide clients with specific legal information relevant to their case.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The law is easy to look up, but telling a client what it means for their case is regulated advice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Guiding clients on seeking registration in countries and doing so cost-effectively
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for clients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2419/04
Source: “Guide clients on seeking registration in countries and doing so cost-effectively.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Filing routes and costs are published, but choosing a country strategy is advice a client wants from a trusted attorney.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing on whether business activities will infringe someone else's patent rights
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for whether business activities will infringe someone else's patent, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2419/04
Source: “Instruct on whether business activities will infringe someone else's patent rights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Freedom-to-operate opinions carry real financial risk, so a qualified attorney reads the patents and stands behind the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Taking action on trademark infringement and passing
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for action, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Take action on trademark infringement and passing off.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Standard warning letters draft easily, but deciding whether and how to enforce is a lawyer's call with real consequences.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Increasing the scope of protection for trademarks
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the scope of protection, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2419/04
Source: “Increase the scope of protection for trademarks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Widening protection means judging how far a registry will let a mark stretch, which comes from practice experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing opposition to trade mark registration
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for opposition, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2419/04
Source: “Manage opposition to trade mark registration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Opposition work mixes documented procedure with tactical judgement about how far the other side will push.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating legal documents to assist solicitors and lawyers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles legal documents and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Negotiate legal documents to assist solicitors and lawyers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Negotiating wording means reading the other side and knowing what your client will accept, which happens between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out invention harvesting as part of a team
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles invention and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2419/04
Source: “Carry out invention harvesting as part of a team in order to come up with a set of possible new inventive ideas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Invention harvesting is a group session where engineers spark ideas off each other, and most of it is unrecorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Obtaining the landlord's agreement for sale or mortgage change of a leasehold property
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the landlord's agreement and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Obtain the landlord's agreement for sale or mortgage change of a leasehold property.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a landlord or managing agent to agree means chasing people, and the sticking points are rarely written down anywhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adapting communication styles and tools when engaging with stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles communication styles and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Adapt communication styles and tools when engaging with stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reading the room and adjusting how you speak is personal skill built in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Tutoring trainee patent attorneys
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles trainee patent attorneys and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2419/04
Source: “Tutor trainee patent attorneys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training a trainee attorney works through feedback on their own drafts and a relationship built over years.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training and mentoring new staff to ensure compliance with intellectual property laws
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles new staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2419/04
Source: “Train and mentor new staff to ensure compliance with intellectual property laws.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Mentoring new staff into good habits depends on a person watching their work and correcting it as they go.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Resolving title-related problems with buyers
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for title-related problems, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Resolve title-related problems with buyers, sellers, contractors, and surveyors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Untangling a title problem means negotiating between buyers, sellers and surveyors, and the facts are usually specific to that property.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Discussing inventions and processes with inventors or manufacturers and ascertain whether they're likely to succeed in being granted patents
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for inventions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2419/04
Source: “Discuss inventions and processes with inventors or manufacturers and ascertain whether they're likely to succeed in being granted patents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether an invention will be granted means drawing out what the inventor actually did, in conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting statements from witnesses
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles statements and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2419/03
Source: “Collect statements from witnesses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking a statement means sitting with the witness and drawing out what they saw.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Exchanging contracts to legally bind the transaction
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for contracts, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Exchange contracts to legally bind the transaction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Exchange legally binds both sides, so UK rules require an authorised person, and it happens live between two firms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Facilitating the exchange of contracts to complete property sales
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the exchange of contracts, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2419/01
Source: “Facilitate the exchange of contracts to complete property sales.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting both sides ready to exchange is coordination between authorised firms, and the binding step itself must be done by a professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Securing agreements from property owners to list properties for sale with estate agencies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles agreements and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Secure agreements from property owners to list properties for sale with estate agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Winning an instruction from a property owner rests on a relationship and a face-to-face pitch.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing technical leadership, advice and guidance
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for technical leadership, advice and guidance, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 50 · 2419/01
Source: “Provide technical leadership, advice, and guidance as needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Colleagues come to a senior person for judgement they trust, and much of that expertise is never written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing a caseload of clients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a caseload of clients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Manage a caseload of clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a live caseload needs a qualified professional holding the client relationship and the deadlines, so tools only assist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing workers in searching records and examining titles
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles workers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2419/01
Source: “Direct workers in searching records and examining titles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing a team is about allocating work and judging people, which depends on knowing the individuals doing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising the work of junior staff to ensure quality and efficiency
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the work of junior staff, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2419/04
Source: “Supervise the work of junior staff to ensure quality and efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervision means a qualified person taking responsibility for others' work and correcting it as they go.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engaging in identifying the limits of their personal professional experience and competence and escalate instructions that are beyond their scope of expertise
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for identifying the limits of their personal professional experience, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2419/03
Source: “Engage in identifying the limits of their personal professional experience and competence and escalate instructions that are beyond their scope of expertise.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Knowing where your own expertise runs out is self-judgement, and nothing in the file records where that line sits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Building and maintaining professional relationships with third parties
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles professional relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2419/01
Source: “Build and maintain professional relationships with third parties.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Professional relationships are built person to person over time, which no tool can do on your behalf.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Building and maintaining valuable relationships with clients to enhance business partnerships
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles valuable relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2419/03
Source: “Build and maintain valuable relationships with clients to enhance business partnerships.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Client relationships grow through personal contact over time and cannot be handed to a tool.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Developing and maintaining professional relationships with stakeholders and senior managers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles professional relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2419/04
Source: “Develop and maintain professional relationships with stakeholders and senior managers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working relationships with stakeholders are built through personal contact that no tool can stand in for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Working with barristers to enforce UK patents
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for barristers, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2419/04
Source: “Work with barristers to enforce UK patents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Enforcement is run jointly with barristers and the courts, where strategy is worked out live between professionals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Meeting with experts or claimants to discuss case details and progress
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles experts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2419/03
Source: “Meet with experts or claimants to discuss case details and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: These meetings depend on live discussion and trust with the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring high standards of client care by providing ethical legal services in the best interests of the client
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for high standards of client care, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2419/03
Source: “Ensure high standards of client care by providing ethical legal services in the best interests of the client.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Acting ethically in a client's best interests is a personal professional duty the regulator places on a named individual.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating settlements for specific civil disputes
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for settlements, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2419/02
Source: “Negotiate settlements for specific civil disputes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Settlement comes from live bargaining between people who can commit, which software cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Representing clients in court proceedings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2419/02
Source: “Represent clients in court proceedings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Speaking for a client in court is a right reserved to authorised people, so software is barred outright.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Exercising IP litigation rights in court
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: IP litigation rights, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Exercise IP litigation rights in court.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Speaking for a client in court is legally an act only a qualified representative may perform.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Representing clients in litigation proceedings at the European Patent Office
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2419/04
Source: “Represent clients in litigation proceedings at the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Representing a client at a hearing is legally reserved to a qualified representative appearing in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £35,500a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 84,800in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: legal files in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: managing legal files and utilising client case management and accounting systems and carrying out searches to see if a proposed trade mark already exists. What it cannot do is be trusted in person, which is what clients run on: someone specific doing it and standing behind it. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Managing legal files and utilising client case management and accounting systems is going; interviewing clients and witnesses is not.

So, given all that: 40% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 33% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 27% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 146 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (interviewing clients and witnesses) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles interviewing clients and witnesses, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to legal professionals n.e.c. (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was solicitors and lawyers: only about 18% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 40/60: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “establish and verify bases for legal proceedings with colleagues specialised in relevant…”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Solicitors and lawyers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “represent clients in court proceedings”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 18% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 18% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Barristers and judges
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “represent clients in court proceedings”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 7% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 7% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Estate agents and auctioneers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “advise clients about buying a home”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 6% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 6% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £30,648 against your £35,507, 13.7% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 40% of its task weight, across 146 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

In US official statistics this job is counted as Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators. Pay and employment stay on this page’s own group; the task list and the scores do not cross over.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for legal professionals n.e.c., and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 40% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for legal professionals n.e.c.. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for legal professionals n.e.c. launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for legal professionals n.e.c. yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for legal professionals n.e.c. existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for legal professionals n.e.c. launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Legal professionals n.e.c.?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 146 official task statements scored for Legal professionals n.e.c. (United Kingdom, SOC 2419), 40% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 53 out of 100 (range 47–60, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Legal professionals n.e.c.” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain accurate records” (88/100, very high); “Search public records for transactions such as sales, leases, and assessments” (88/100, very high); “Draft sales or service contracts for products or services” (88/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Legal professionals n.e.c.” stay human?: About 27% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Represent clients in litigation proceedings at the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC)” (4/100, minimal); “Exercise IP litigation rights in court” (4/100, minimal); “Represent clients in court proceedings” (4/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Legal professionals n.e.c.” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 40% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 27% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Legal professionals n.e.c. calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 146 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
2 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.