Will AI replace Medical radiographers?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 117 official task statements scored for Medical radiographers (United Kingdom, SOC 2254), 19% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 24 out of 100 (range 20–30, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Medical radiographers” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Input data into computer systems for record-keeping” (100/100, very high); “Maintain records of equipment settings as required” (93/100, very high); “Type detailed reports of cardiac and vascular diagnostic procedures” (81/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Medical radiographers” stay human?

About 77% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Operate fluoroscope to aid physician to view and guide wire or catheter through blood vessels to area of interest” (0/100, minimal); “Maintain a proper sterile field during surgical procedures” (0/100, minimal); “Attach electrodes to patients' chests, arms, and legs and connect to ECG machine leads” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Medical radiographers” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 19% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 77% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Medical radiographers calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 117 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Medical radiographers

checking sonographic equipment and submitting maintenance requests, observing and reassuring patients during treatment and assisting in conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists and surgeons. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI is already taking a real slice of the routine work here: maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records. That is a slice of tasks, not of you.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 19%
changing shape: 5%
staying human: 77%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 24 out of 100 (20–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 117 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for medical radiographers is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

That slice is not coming back; the core of the job, observing and reassuring patients during treatment, stays yours. The tools change hands, the accountability doesn't.

Your week, as this page understands it

Medical (diagnostic) radiographers operate x-ray machines, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and other imaging devices for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, assist in the diagnosis of injuries and diseases and are involved in intervention procedures such as the removal of kidney stones. They operate under the supervision of senior staff. Therapeutic radiographers specialise in the planning and administration of radiotherapy treatment for patients with cancer. The job title says “medical radiographers”. The real job is the part underneath: observing and reassuring patients during treatment. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But medical radiographers is not one task. It is 117 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is observing and reassuring patients during treatment, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 19%
changing shape: 5%
staying human: 77%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
4 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

22 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2254/01, 2254/02
Source: “Maintain accurate and confidential patient or client records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Imaging records are structured and mostly captured by the system already, so keeping them accurate is largely automated work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording patient information, including identification, medical history and examination results
This is reading one thing and writing another: patient information, including identification in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2254/01, 2254/03
Source: “Record patient information, including identification, medical history, and examination results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This is structured information that mostly already exists in hospital systems, so capturing and filing it is well suited to software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping records and archive computerised images to support medical diagnoses
This is reading one thing and writing another: records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Keep records and archive computerised images to support medical diagnoses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Filing and archiving images is screen work that imaging systems already handle with very little human input.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of sonograms and interpretations
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of sonograms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Maintain records of sonograms and interpretations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records of scans and their interpretations is straightforward screen work that record systems already do most of.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

6 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Calculating prescribed radiation doses
The software now makes the first pass at prescribed radiation doses, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2254/02
Source: “Calculate prescribed radiation doses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dose calculation is arithmetic that systems already do, though a qualified professional must sign for radiation given to a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating actual treatment dosages delivered during each session
The software now makes the first pass at actual treatment dosages delivered during each session, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Calculate actual treatment dosages delivered during each session.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The dose arithmetic is straightforward to compute, but rules require qualified staff to produce and check it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting diagnostic images for patient assessment
The software now makes the first pass at diagnostic images, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2254/01
Source: “Interpret diagnostic images for patient assessment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image reading software is genuinely strong, but the formal report must come from a registered professional who carries the responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

89 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Explaining testing procedures to patients
This work happens in the physical world: procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/01, 2254/03
Source: “Explain testing procedures to patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clear explanations write themselves easily, but they land better face to face with a patient who is nervous.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Following policies and procedures for radiation workers to ensure personnel safety
This work happens in the physical world: policies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01, 2254/02
Source: “Follow policies and procedures for radiation workers to ensure personnel safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The rules are written down clearly, but following them means a trained radiation worker behaving correctly in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing and reassuring patients during treatment
This work happens in the physical world: patients during treatment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01, 2254/02
Source: “Observe and reassure patients during treatment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reassurance during treatment depends on a real person being there with the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

Show the other 107 tasks

Inputting data into computer systems for record-keeping
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Input data into computer systems for record-keeping.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 100 out of 100 (96–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Typing information into a records system is exactly the kind of routine data work computers already do faster and more accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining records of equipment settings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of equipment settings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Maintain records of equipment settings as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Machines already log their own settings, so keeping these records is the part most easily handled by software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Typing detailed reports of cardiac and vascular diagnostic procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports of cardiac in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2254/03
Source: “Type detailed reports of cardiac and vascular diagnostic procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning procedure notes into a detailed typed report is exactly the kind of writing software now does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring stock levels and ordering supplies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: stock levels in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/01
Source: “Monitor stock levels and order supplies as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reordering runs straight off usage data, though someone still has to check what is actually on the shelf.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining accurate records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records accurate is structured work on information the imaging systems already capture, so software handles most of it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coding film from procedures and completing appropriate documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: film in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2254/01
Source: “Code film from procedures and complete appropriate documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coding and paperwork follow clear rules and plenty of examples, making this among the easiest parts to hand over.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Distributing reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports of diagnostic procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2254/03
Source: “Distribute reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sending completed reports to the right clinician is routine electronic work, though urgent findings still get flagged by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Processing diagnostic images from medical procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: diagnostic images in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Process diagnostic images from medical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Processing images after the procedure is software work, with a practitioner checking the result before it is used.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with legislation on recording and keeping radiation dose information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: compliance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Ensure compliance with legislation on recording and keeping radiation dose information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Dose records are structured numbers with clear legal rules, so checking and keeping them is largely a systems job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing radiation protection documentation to manage radiation safety
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: radiation protection documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Produce radiation protection documentation to manage radiation safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Radiation safety paperwork follows published rules and local dose data, so software can draft it well, though the employer still approves it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of radiological and environmental conditions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of radiological in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Maintain records of radiological and environmental conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: These are numeric readings logged in a set format, so recording and checking them is largely a systems job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing emergency plans and contingency procedures for radiation incidents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: emergency plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Prepare emergency plans and contingency procedures for radiation incidents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Contingency plans follow published legal templates and local layouts, so drafting them is straightforward, with the safety adviser checking the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing maintenance or testing requirements for radiation protection equipment to ensure compliance with legislative and manufacturer's requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: maintenance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Review maintenance or testing requirements for radiation protection equipment to ensure compliance with legislative and manufacturer's requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This is comparing schedules and records against written legal and manufacturer requirements, which software checks quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing cardiac physiology and calculating valve areas from blood flow velocity measurements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cardiac physiology in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Assess cardiac physiology and calculate valve areas from blood flow velocity measurements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once the flow measurements exist, the sums and comparisons follow set formulas that software applies reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Comparing measurements of heart wall thickness and chamber sizes to standards to identify abnormalities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: measurements of heart wall thickness in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Compare measurements of heart wall thickness and chamber sizes to standards to identify abnormalities, using the results of an echocardiogram.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once the measurements exist, comparing them with published normal ranges is a calculation software performs quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting monitoring results to doctors for patient evaluation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Report monitoring results to doctors for patient evaluation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The numbers come off the monitoring equipment in a standard form and the doctor makes the actual judgement afterwards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying training needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: needs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2254/02
Source: “Identify training needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out where training gaps are is analysis of records, which software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Scanning and interpreting tapes from Holter and event monitors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tapes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2254/03
Source: “Scan and interpret tapes from Holter and event monitors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Heart-rhythm software already reads these recordings well, with a trained person checking the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Advising on the safe transport of radioactive materials
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the safe transport of radioactive materials, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2254/02
Source: “Advise on the safe transport of radioactive materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Transport rules are published in detail, so accurate advice can be drafted, though a certified safety adviser is normally involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring training and assessment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at assessment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Ensure training and assessment are conducted where necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Arranging and tracking training is organised paperwork that software handles well, once someone decides what is needed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining control records for radioactive nuclei
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at control records, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Maintain control records for radioactive nuclei.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Radioactive source records follow a fixed format, though physical stock checks and legal responsibility stay with staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing radiation risks in the workplace
staying human
The ratings behind this row put radiation risks well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Assess radiation risks in the workplace.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Dose limits and survey methods are published, but judging a specific room's risk means measuring it in person, and a certified adviser signs off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing health advice to raise awareness about cancer prevention and care
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles health advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2254/02
Source: “Provide health advice to raise awareness about cancer prevention and care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Health advice is well documented and easy to draft, though people take it more seriously from a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Managing referrals to ensure patients receive a radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for referrals, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2254/01
Source: “Manage referrals to ensure patients receive a radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Referral protocols are documented and can be checked automatically, but justifying each patient's exposure is legally a registered practitioner's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing sonogram and oral or written summary of technical findings to doctor for use in medical diagnosis
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for sonogram, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2254/01
Source: “Provide sonogram and oral or written summary of technical findings to doctor for use in medical diagnosis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Drafting a clear summary of findings is well within software reach, though the doctor relies on a registered practitioner judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and evaluating the outcome of treatments to ensure effectiveness
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the outcome of treatments well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Monitor and evaluate the outcome of treatments to ensure effectiveness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Outcome data is recorded and can be analysed automatically, though reviewing how a patient is actually responding involves seeing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Referring patients to other healthcare practitioners
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2254/01
Source: “Refer patients to other healthcare practitioners as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software can flag who might need onward care, but in imaging the referral must be made by a registered professional allowed to make it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging in continuous professional development to maintain or improve knowledge and skills
staying human
The ratings behind this row put continuous professional development well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Engage in continuous professional development to maintain or improve knowledge and skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (26–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Learning material and development records can be prepared automatically, but the registered professional has to do the learning themselves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Checking sonographic equipment and submitting maintenance requests
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sonographic equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Check sonographic equipment and submit maintenance requests as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Filling in the maintenance request is easy to automate, but somebody still has to physically check the scanner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing screen during scan to ensure image quality for diagnostic purposes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: screen during scan, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Observe screen during scan to ensure image quality for diagnostic purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software can watch image quality live, yet the person holding the probe is the one making the scan work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring and upholding professional practice standards in radiography and sonography
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for professional practice standards, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Ensure and uphold professional practice standards in radiography and sonography.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Standards can be written down and checked, but upholding them day to day rests on a registered professional in the department.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting doctors and radiation oncologists in preparing physical aspects of radiation treatment plans based on patient condition
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for doctors, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2254/02
Source: “Assist doctors and radiation oncologists in preparing physical aspects of radiation treatment plans based on patient condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Planning software does much of the calculation, but radiation plans are prepared under a qualified clinical team responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on the design of plant
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the design of plant, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2254/02
Source: “Advise on the design of plant, equipment, and waste disposal to ensure safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Safety rules for equipment and waste are written down, but advising on a specific site needs professional judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing carers or family members on patient treatment plans
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles carers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Instruct carers or family members on patient treatment plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clear written instructions are easy to produce, but families usually need someone to talk them through it and check understanding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating inspections and compliance activities with inspectorates and regulatory bodies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles inspections and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Coordinate inspections and compliance activities with inspectorates and regulatory bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Documentation for inspections can be prepared automatically, but dealing with regulators involves named people arranging and attending visits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing formal and informal education to other staff members
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: formal, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Provide formal and informal education to other staff members.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching materials are easy to produce, but colleagues learn most from someone showing them in the department.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording and storing suitable images using camera unit connected to ultrasound equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: suitable images, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Record and store suitable images using camera unit connected to ultrasound equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Capturing and storing images happens at the machine during the scan, though the storing part is largely automatic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning a course of treatment with patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a course of treatment, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Plan a course of treatment with patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Planning software already does much of the calculation, but only a registered radiographer may set a radiotherapy course, and the patient is part of the conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting doctors in diagnosing cardiac or peripheral vascular conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: doctors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/03
Source: “Assist doctors in diagnosing cardiac or peripheral vascular conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Image analysis tools are strong and the doctor makes the call, but getting the pictures means scanning the patient in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Deciding which images
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: images, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Decide which images to include, looking for differences between healthy and pathological areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software can flag unusual areas, but selecting images happens during a scan run by a qualified person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the safe operation of specialist medical equipment in areas
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the safe operation of specialist medical equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Assess the safe operation of specialist medical equipment in areas such as radiotherapy and ultrasound.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Test routines and tolerances are written down, but checking a scanner or linac means taking measurements on the machine itself with a physics expert involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with doctors and clinical oncologists on patient care
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for doctors, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Liaise with doctors and clinical oncologists on patient care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Talking through a patient care with doctors relies on shared clinical judgement built in conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating accidents to identify causes and prevent future occurrences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accidents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/02
Source: “Investigate accidents to identify causes and prevent future occurrences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cause analysis is well documented, but establishing what happened means being on site, and dose incidents need a physics expert's input.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring gauges, recorder and video screens of data analysis system during imaging of cardiovascular system
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: gauges, recorder and video screens of data analysis, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2254/03
Source: “Monitor gauges, recorder, and video screens of data analysis system during imaging of cardiovascular system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Watching monitors during a procedure can be partly automated, but staff must be in the lab as it happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Determining whether to extend the scope of an examination based on findings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Determine whether to extend the scope of an examination based on findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Deciding to look further mid-scan is a clinical call a registered practitioner makes with the patient in front of them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing patients and their clinical requirements to determine appropriate radiographic techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Assess patients and their clinical requirements to determine appropriate radiographic techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Protocols are well documented, but only a registered radiographer may decide the exposure for a patient they have assessed in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to departmental policies relevant to the role of a Sonographer
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/01
Source: “Adhere to departmental policies relevant to the role of a Sonographer.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Policies are easy to look up, but following them is something the person doing the scan has to do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with therapeutic radiographers for treatment planning
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles therapeutic radiographers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Coordinate with therapeutic radiographers for treatment planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Scheduling and shared records help, but coordinating a radiotherapy plan is a discussion between the clinicians responsible for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Explaining the management of acute and long-term radiotherapy side effects to patients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the management of acute, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Explain the management of acute and long-term radiotherapy side effects to patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The information is easy to write down, but patients coping with side effects want it from someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with clinical staff and professionals to provide patient care
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles clinical staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Collaborate with clinical staff and professionals to provide patient care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Shared records help coordination, but delivering care together happens between named colleagues working in the same department.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in multidisciplinary meetings to review patient treatment plans and referrals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles multidisciplinary meetings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Participate in multidisciplinary meetings to review patient treatment plans and referrals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Notes and summaries for the meeting can be prepared automatically, but the decisions come from clinicians discussing cases together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Using medical imaging
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/02
Source: “Use medical imaging to diagnose, treat, and manage various conditions and diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image-reading software is good, but taking the scans is done at the machine and only a registered professional may expose a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring patients' blood pressure and heart rate
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients' blood pressure, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/03
Source: “Monitor patients' blood pressure and heart rate using electrocardiogram (ECG) equipment during procedures to alert physicians to abnormalities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Monitors already flag abnormal readings automatically, but someone must attach them and be in the procedure room to respond.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training cardiology students
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cardiology students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2254/03
Source: “Train cardiology students.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material is easy to produce, but clinical students learn by being supervised on real cases in the department.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training healthcare staff to use specialist equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: healthcare staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/01
Source: “Train healthcare staff to use specialist equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Course notes can be drafted automatically, but showing colleagues how to handle the actual scanner means standing at the machine with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training medical physics technicians on new equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical physics technicians, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Train medical physics technicians on new equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Manuals and course notes can be generated, but training people on new equipment is done at the machine with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring patients' conditions and reactions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients' conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Monitor patients' conditions and reactions, reporting abnormal signs to physician.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Some readings are picked up by machines, but noticing how a patient looks and reacts means being with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Checking equipment to ensure that it is operating and functioning correctly
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/01
Source: “Check equipment to ensure that it is operating and functioning correctly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Test schedules and logs are easy to automate, but the daily check happens standing at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing radiography and imaging support assistants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radiography, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2254/01
Source: “Oversee radiography and imaging support assistants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Overseeing assistants means being on the floor with them, judging work as it happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining medical instruments to ensure proper working condition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical instruments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/01, 2254/02
Source: “Maintain medical instruments to ensure proper working condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Schedules and checks can be planned automatically, but keeping equipment working means handling it in the department.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining test results and treatments options to patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for test results, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Explain test results and treatments options to patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written explanations are easy to generate, but telling someone what their scan shows is done by a qualified clinician, face to face.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Responding to the client's questions and concerns about their diagnosis and treatment
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the client's questions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Respond to the client's questions and concerns about their diagnosis and treatment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Answers about a scan's meaning come from a qualified clinician the patient is speaking to, not from a written response.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising cardiology technologists
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cardiology technologists, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Supervise cardiology technologists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Rotas and performance records can be handled automatically, but overseeing staff as they work with patients needs a senior person present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting and testing cardiology equipment to ensure proper operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cardiology equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Inspect and test cardiology equipment to ensure proper operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Testing cardiology equipment means handling it, even though the results are recorded on a form.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining valid consent from clients for procedures
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for valid consent, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Obtain valid consent from clients for procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Valid consent means a registered professional explaining the procedure to the patient and checking they understand, which forms alone cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Readjusting equipment to eliminate problems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/01
Source: “Readjust equipment to eliminate problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fixing a problem with the equipment usually means putting hands on it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring handling of radioactive materials to ensure adherence to established procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radioactive materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Monitor handling of radioactive materials to ensure adherence to established procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Records can be checked automatically, but watching how radioactive material is actually handled needs an appointed supervisor in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing support and reassurance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: support, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Provide support and reassurance to patients, taking into account their physical and psychological needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Calming a nervous patient inside a scanner happens in the room, face to face, and depends on the person doing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Observing ultrasound display screen and listening to signals to record vascular information
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: ultrasound display screen, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/03
Source: “Observe ultrasound display screen and listen to signals to record vascular information such as blood pressure, limb volume changes, oxygen saturation, and cerebral circulation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Reading the traces can be automated, but the pictures only exist while someone holds the probe against the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Establishing and maintaining trust with patients to support their treatment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: trust, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/02
Source: “Establish and maintain trust with patients to support their treatment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Trust between a patient and the person treating them is built in person and is the point of the task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Setting controls to regulate dosage
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: controls, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Set controls to regulate dosage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Setting the dose controls happens at the machine and must be done by an authorised operator.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Reporting unusual reactions to doctor or turn equipment off if unexpected adverse reactions occur
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unusual reactions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Report unusual reactions to doctor or turn equipment off if unexpected adverse reactions occur.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting an unexpected reaction and stopping the machine needs someone watching the patient in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out health screenings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health screenings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2254/02
Source: “Carry out health screenings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Screening usually involves scanning or examining a real person, so someone has to be there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring patients for side effects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Monitor patients for side effects such as skin irritation, nausea, or hair loss to assess treatment reactions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Noticing sore skin or sickness means looking at and talking to the patient in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising radiotherapy technologists during patient treatments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radiotherapy technologists during patient treatments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2254/02
Source: “Supervise radiotherapy technologists during patient treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising treatments means being in the room and answerable for what happens to the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting learners in the clinical learning environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: learners, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/02
Source: “Support learners in the clinical learning environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supporting a learner on the ward depends on being there and building their confidence.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Dealing sensitively with patients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/01
Source: “Deal sensitively with patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Kindness to an anxious patient in the room is the point here, and that needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Supervising medical sonography students
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical sonography students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2254/01
Source: “Supervise medical sonography students.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching students at the scanner depends on watching them work and building their confidence in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating ultrasound equipment to perform diagnostic medical examinations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: ultrasound equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Operate ultrasound equipment to perform diagnostic medical examinations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: This is hands on a patient with a probe, so it cannot be done without someone in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Producing diagnostic images using radiographic and sonographic equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diagnostic images, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2254/01
Source: “Produce diagnostic images using radiographic and sonographic equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking the images means operating equipment on a real person, which needs a trained pair of hands present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning patients and equipment correctly for monitoring
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/01
Source: “Position patients and equipment correctly for monitoring.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Placing a patient and the equipment correctly is done by hand in the room, so it cannot be done remotely.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assisting in conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists and surgeons
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Assist in conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists and surgeons.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Complex imaging examinations are carried out in the room with hands on the equipment beside the doctors.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning sonographic equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sonographic equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Clean sonographic equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning the equipment is physical work that has to happen in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Transferring patient to ultrasound table
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patient, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/01
Source: “Transfer patient to ultrasound table, scrub skin, apply gel, and position patient properly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Moving, positioning and preparing a patient is physical care that only a person in the room can give.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Operating specialised mammography equipment safely and within standard operating procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specialised mammography equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/01
Source: “Operate specialised mammography equipment safely and within standard operating procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Running a mammography machine means positioning a real patient safely, which needs trained hands present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Producing images of objects on film using radiographic techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: images of objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/01
Source: “Produce images of objects on film using radiographic techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Producing the images is equipment work carried out on a person, so presence is unavoidable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning and sterilising instruments, equipment or materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: instruments, equipment or materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/01
Source: “Clean and sterilise instruments, equipment, or materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning and sterilising equipment is done by hand with the items themselves, so it is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in medical procedures and laboratory tests
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2254/01
Source: “Assist in medical procedures and laboratory tests.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assisting during a procedure means being in the room handling equipment alongside the clinical team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Independentlying conduct treatment sessions following the long-term plan and under the doctor's general direction
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conduct treatment sessions following the long-term plan, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/02
Source: “Independently conduct treatment sessions following the long-term plan and under the doctor's general direction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a treatment session means being with the patient at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning patients for treatment accurately according to prescription
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2254/02
Source: “Position patients for treatment accurately according to prescription.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Positioning a patient accurately is hands-on work at the treatment couch.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Positioning patients on cradle and attaching immobilisation devices if needed for appropriate imaging placement
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Position patients on cradle and attach immobilisation devices if needed for appropriate imaging placement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Placing a patient on the cradle and fitting supports is physical work at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Using radiation safety measures and protection devices to comply with government regulations and ensure safety of patients and staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radiation safety measures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/02
Source: “Use radiation safety measures and protection devices to comply with government regulations and ensure safety of patients and staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: This means physically placing shields and setting the machine in the room with the patient, which nothing on a screen can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating radiography safety equipment to protect patients and staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radiography safety equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/02
Source: “Operate radiography safety equipment to protect patients and staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Using shielding and protective equipment in the room is physical work that needs someone there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing sealed radium for radiation treatments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sealed radium, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/02
Source: “Prepare sealed radium for radiation treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Preparing radioactive sources is careful physical handling in a controlled room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Storing special applicators containing radioactive substances
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: special applicators containing radioactive substances, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/02
Source: “Store special applicators containing radioactive substances.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Storing radioactive applicators safely is physical handling under strict rules.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Conducting echocardiogram to record patients' cardiac activity using specialised equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: echocardiogram, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/03
Source: “Conduct echocardiogram to record patients' cardiac activity using specialised equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The scan only happens with someone holding the probe on the patient's chest, which is physical work in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing patients for examinations, tests or treatments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2254/03
Source: “Prepare patients for examinations, tests, or treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Getting a patient ready for a scan happens physically in the department with the patient there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing balloons and stents for vascular procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: balloons, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2254/03
Source: “Prepare balloons and stents for vascular procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Preparing balloons and stents is delicate physical preparation in the procedure room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Positioning patients as instructed by medical personnel
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2254/03
Source: “Position patients as instructed by medical personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Moving a patient into position is done by hand at the bedside or scanner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting doctors during complex cardiovascular procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: doctors during complex cardiovascular procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2254/03
Source: “Support doctors during complex cardiovascular procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Assisting during a procedure means being at the table with the doctor and patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Operating the ECG machine to obtain a reading
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the ECG machine, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2254/03
Source: “Operate the ECG machine to obtain a reading.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running the ECG machine means attaching it to a patient in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Injecting contrast medium into patients' blood vessels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: contrast medium, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/03
Source: “Inject contrast medium into patients' blood vessels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Putting a needle into a patient's vein is physical work that only a trained, registered professional may do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating diagnostic imaging equipment to produce contrast-enhanced radiographs of heart and cardiovascular system
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diagnostic imaging equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/03
Source: “Operate diagnostic imaging equipment to produce contrast-enhanced radiographs of heart and cardiovascular system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Operating the imaging equipment with the patient in front of it is physical work only a registered operator may do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting up 24-hour Holter and event monitors for patient monitoring
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: 24-hour holter, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2254/03
Source: “Set up 24-hour Holter and event monitors for patient monitoring.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fitting a monitor to a patient for twenty-four hours is hands-on work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attaching electrodes to patients' chests
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrodes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2254/03
Source: “Attach electrodes to patients' chests, arms, and legs and connect to ECG machine leads.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Attaching electrodes to someone chest and limbs is physical work on a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining a proper sterile field during surgical procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: a proper sterile field during surgical procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2254/03
Source: “Maintain a proper sterile field during surgical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping the sterile field means physically managing the area around the patient during the procedure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating fluoroscope to aid physician to view and guiding wire or catheter through blood vessels to area of interest
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fluoroscope, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2254/03
Source: “Operate fluoroscope to aid physician to view and guide wire or catheter through blood vessels to area of interest.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Someone must stand in the room working the imaging machine while the doctor moves the catheter, so it cannot be done remotely.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £48,400a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 44,200in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: patient information, including identification in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records and recording patient information, including identification, medical history and examination results. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where patients during treatment gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: observing and reassuring patients during treatment is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 19% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 5% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 77% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 117 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to patient information, including identification, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding: a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes: ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether patients during treatment is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near calculating prescribed radiation doses. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to medical radiographers (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was registered children's nurses: only about 7% of its durable work is work you already do and it pays 13.4% less. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 24/100 here, with only 19% of the task list in the top band, and “assess patients and their clinical requirements to determine appropriate radiographic techniques” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Registered children's nurses
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “prepare patients for examinations, tests, or treatments”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 7% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 7% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £41,963 against your £48,439, 13.4% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Registered community nurses
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “prepare patients for examinations, tests, or treatments”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £40,897 against your £48,439, 15.6% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Generalist medical practitioners
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already explain testing procedures to patients, and their equivalent is to explain procedures, test results, and treatments to patients. Across both published task lists that is about 3% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 19% of its task weight, across 117 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like observing and reassuring patients during treatment arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

If you run a team doing this job

If you run a team doing this job, the conversation you owe them is the one on this page, and sooner than feels comfortable. Show them the ledger rather than a reassurance: the rows moving toward the software are maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records, and the rows that are not are where you want your people visible. Ask each of them to do the this-week move and bring the list to your next one-to-one. It turns a rumour into a piece of work, and it tells you which parts of your team's week are actually at stake. And say the thing out loud that a team lead usually leaves unsaid: a shrinking team is your exposure too, so do the move yourself as well.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Photographers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Photographers, Radiation Therapists, Cardiovascular Technologists and Technicians, Diagnostic Medical Sonographers, Nuclear Medicine Technologists, Radiologic Technologists and Technicians, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists and Medical Dosimetrists. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for medical radiographers, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 19% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for medical radiographers. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for medical radiographers launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for medical radiographers yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for medical radiographers existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for medical radiographers launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Medical radiographers?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 117 official task statements scored for Medical radiographers (United Kingdom, SOC 2254), 19% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 24 out of 100 (range 20–30, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Medical radiographers” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Input data into computer systems for record-keeping” (100/100, very high); “Maintain records of equipment settings as required” (93/100, very high); “Type detailed reports of cardiac and vascular diagnostic procedures” (81/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Medical radiographers” stay human?: About 77% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Operate fluoroscope to aid physician to view and guide wire or catheter through blood vessels to area of interest” (0/100, minimal); “Maintain a proper sterile field during surgical procedures” (0/100, minimal); “Attach electrodes to patients' chests, arms, and legs and connect to ECG machine leads” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Medical radiographers” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 19% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 77% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Medical radiographers calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 117 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
4 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.