Will AI replace Metal making and treating process operatives?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 52 official task statements scored for Metal making and treating process operatives (United Kingdom, SOC 8115), 3% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 6 out of 100 (range 5–11, band: minimal). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Metal making and treating process operatives” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Read production schedules to identify specifications for materials, cutting lines, and tolerances” (69/100, high); “Maintain production records detailing quantities, types, and dimensions of materials produced” (69/100, high); “Determine work methods and machine setup requirements based on product specifications” (51/100, partial). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Metal making and treating process operatives” stay human?

About 95% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Replace defective components or parts using hand tools and precision instruments” (0/100, minimal); “Move equipment, material, and waste using safe manual and mechanical handling techniques” (0/100, minimal); “Lubricate moving parts of conveyors to ensure smooth operation” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Metal making and treating process operatives” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 3% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 95% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Metal making and treating process operatives calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 52 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Metal making and treating process operatives

ensuring compliance with health, identifying and rectifying paint or preparation defects and cleaning chipped area using a wire brush. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI changes the edges of this job, not the middle: cleaning and maintaining spraying equipment is work software can't reach.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 3%
changing shape: 2%
staying human: 95%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 6 out of 100 (5–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, across 52 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for metal making and treating process operatives is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

What shifts is reading production schedules to identify specifications: the paper around the work, not the work.

Your week, as this page understands it

Metal making and treating process operatives operate furnaces, ovens and other heating vessels, drawing, rolling, extruding, galvanising, forging and other metal processing equipment to smelt, shape, coat and treat metal and metal products. The job title says “metal making” or “treating process operatives”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: cleaning and maintaining spraying equipment. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But metal making and treating process operatives is not one task. It is 52 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is cleaning and maintaining spraying equipment, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 3%
changing shape: 2%
staying human: 95%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
20 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

2 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Reading production schedules to identify specifications
This is reading one thing and writing another: production schedules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Read production schedules to identify specifications for materials, cutting lines, and tolerances.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading a schedule for materials, cut lines and tolerances is straightforward information work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining production records detailing quantities
This is reading one thing and writing another: production records detailing quantities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 8115/02
Source: “Maintain production records detailing quantities, types, and dimensions of materials produced.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Production records are structured data entry that software handles quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

1 task

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Determining work methods and machine setup requirements based on product specifications
The software now makes the first pass at work methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 8115/01
Source: “Determine work methods and machine setup requirements based on product specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 51 out of 100 (44–58 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setup parameters come from documented process sheets and product specifications, which software can work through reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Staying human

49 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Ensuring compliance with health, safety and environmental protection measures in industrial coatings work
This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 8115/02
Source: “Ensure compliance with health, safety, and environmental protection measures in industrial coatings work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Safety rules and records are well documented and easy to prepare, but compliance is checked on the shop floor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Cleaning and maintaining spraying equipment
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 8115/02
Source: “Clean and maintain spraying equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning spray equipment is manual maintenance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring gauges to ensure that machinery is operating correctly
This work happens in the physical world: gauges, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Monitor gauges to ensure that machinery is operating correctly, making adjustments or stopping machinery when issues arise.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Gauges can be read automatically, but stopping and adjusting the machine is done by someone standing at it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting coated or plated areas
This work happens in the physical world: coated, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Inspect coated or plated areas for defects, such as air bubbles or uneven coverage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spotting bubbles and thin coverage means viewing the panel from several angles and feeling the surface.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting controls to set temperatures and speeds of coating machines and equipment
This work happens in the physical world: controls, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Adjust controls to set temperatures and speeds of coating machines and equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting temperatures and speeds is done at the machine’s own controls.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting visual quality checks, including wet/dry film thickness testing and colour matching
This work happens in the physical world: visual quality checks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Conduct visual quality checks, including wet/dry film thickness testing and colour matching.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking coating thickness and colour on the actual surface needs a person with gauges at the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Holding or positioning spray guns to direct spray onto articles
This work happens in the physical world: spray guns, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Hold or position spray guns to direct spray onto articles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Holding and aiming a spray gun is pure hand skill performed at the vehicle.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

Show the other 42 tasks

Determining sizes and compositions of objects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sizes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 8115/02
Source: “Determine sizes and compositions of objects to be plated.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sizes and materials usually come off the job ticket, though someone often has to look at the parts themselves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring the accuracy and quality of measurement results by following specified procedures and methodologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the accuracy, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Ensure the accuracy and quality of measurement results by following specified procedures and methodologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The procedures are documented and the sums can be checked automatically, but taking the measurements themselves means handling the metal and the gauges.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Detecting and troubleshooting equipment issues to maintain production quality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment issues, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/01
Source: “Detect and troubleshoot equipment issues to maintain production quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Machine data flags problems early, but tracking down and fixing the cause means being at the line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and rectifying paint or preparation defects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: paint, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/02
Source: “Identify and rectify paint or preparation defects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spotting a paint fault can be helped by cameras, but putting it right means sanding and respraying.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning and tidying work areas
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/01
Source: “Clean and tidy work areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning and tidying a work area is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out minor repairs to galvanising and plating machinery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: minor repairs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/01
Source: “Carry out minor repairs to galvanising and plating machinery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Repairing plating machinery is done with tools on the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning and moving metal wires or workpieces through a series of dies to form die impressions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: metal wires, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 8115/01
Source: “Position and move metal wires or workpieces through a series of dies to form die impressions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Feeding wire through dies is hands-on work at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Preparing working areas for industrial coatings application using established safe manual and mechanical handling techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Prepare working areas for industrial coatings application using established safe manual and mechanical handling techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preparing a coating area means moving equipment and materials by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Setting up plating or coating machines for metal or plastic products
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plating, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 8115/02
Source: “Set up plating or coating machines for metal or plastic products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting up a plating line is physical work on the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting dials to control current and voltage for plating processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: dials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Adjust dials to control current and voltage for plating processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Turning dials for current and voltage is done at the rectifier.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning equipment as part of preventive maintenance tasks
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Clean equipment as part of preventive maintenance tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning equipment is physical work on the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Examining completed objects to determine thicknesses of metal deposits
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: completed objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Examine completed objects to determine thicknesses of metal deposits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Measuring deposit thickness means holding the part and the instrument.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Immersing workpieces in coating solutions or liquid metal or plastic for specified times
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workpieces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Immerse workpieces in coating solutions or liquid metal or plastic for specified times.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Lowering parts into a plating tank for a set time is hands-on line work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Monitoring and measuring thicknesses of electroplating on component parts to verify conformance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: thicknesses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Monitor and measure thicknesses of electroplating on component parts to verify conformance to specifications, using micrometres.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Using a micrometre on a component is hands-on measuring.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Positioning and feeding materials into processing machines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Position and feed materials into processing machines, by hand or by using automated equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Feeding materials into the machine is manual loading work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Rinsing drain or wipe coated workpieces to remove excess coating material or facilitate setting of finish coats
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: drain, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Rinse, drain, or wipe coated workpieces to remove excess coating material or facilitate setting of finish coats.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Rinsing and wiping coated pieces is hands-on finishing work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Using, storing and maintaining respiratory protective equipment correctly
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: respiratory protective equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 8115/02
Source: “Use, store and maintain respiratory protective equipment correctly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Wearing, storing and checking breathing equipment is physical and personal.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Cleaning chipped area using a wire brush
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: chipped area, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/02
Source: “Clean chipped area using a wire brush.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Wire-brushing a chipped area clean is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Mixing and testing solutions for industrial processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: solutions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/02
Source: “Mix and test solutions for industrial processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Mixing and testing chemical solutions is done at the tank.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Placing plated or coated materials on racks
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plated, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/02
Source: “Place plated or coated materials on racks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Loading racks with parts is lifting and placing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Removing objects from solutions at periodic intervals to verify conformance to specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/02
Source: “Remove objects from solutions at periodic intervals to verify conformance to specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Lifting parts out of a solution to check them is hands-on work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Undertaking surface preparation of steelwork using specified methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surface preparation of steelwork, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 8115/02
Source: “Undertake surface preparation of steelwork using specified methods such as hand or power tool cleaning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preparing steel surfaces with hand or power tools is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting operational tests on machinery to verify proper functioning
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: operational tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Conduct operational tests on machinery to verify proper functioning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running a machine to check it works properly is done standing at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Measuring, marking and mask areas to be excluded from plating
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: mask areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Measure, mark, and mask areas to be excluded from plating.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Measuring, marking and masking a part is done by hand on the part.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Plating small objects, such as nuts or bolts, using motor-driven barrels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: small objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Plate small objects, such as nuts or bolts, using motor-driven barrels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Barrel plating small parts is operated at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Setting rolls, brushes and guides on coating machines using micrometres, rulers and hand tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rolls, brushes and guides, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Set rolls, brushes, and guides on coating machines using micrometres, rulers, and hand tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting rolls and guides with hand tools is machine work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Weighing or measuring materials or products to ensure specification conformance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 8115/02
Source: “Weigh or measure materials or products to ensure specification conformance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Weighing and measuring products requires hands on the goods and the scales.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying primer coats to prepare surfaces for painting
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: primer coats, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Apply primer coats to prepare surfaces for painting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Priming a surface means physically coating it, which needs a person standing at the wall.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Drying them with cloths, centrifugal dryers or by tumbling in sawdust-filled barrels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: them, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Dry them with cloths, centrifugal dryers, or by tumbling in sawdust-filled barrels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Drying parts by cloth, dryer or tumbling is physical handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Immersing suspended objects in plating solutions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: suspended objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Immerse suspended objects in plating solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Lowering parts into a plating bath is done by hand or crane.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating shot blasting machinery to clean metal castings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: shot blasting machinery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Operate shot blasting machinery to clean metal castings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Operating a shot blaster is hands-on machine work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning objects to be plated in frames
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Position objects to be plated in frames.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Placing objects into frames is manual handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Removing excess materials or impurities from objects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: excess materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Remove excess materials or impurities from objects, using air hoses or grinding machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning up parts with air lines or grinders is hands-on work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Suspending objects to be plated from positive or negative terminals of power supplies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 8115/02
Source: “Suspend objects to be plated from positive or negative terminals of power supplies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Hanging parts on terminals is physical work at the tank.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preheating workpieces, using heating furnaces or hand torches
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workpieces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 8115/02
Source: “Preheat workpieces, using heating furnaces or hand torches.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence, and it moved between repeat runs, so the range is widened.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preheating a workpiece with a furnace or torch is a hands-on shop-floor step.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Turning valves to spray vats with atomisers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: valves, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 8115/02
Source: “Turn valves to spray vats with atomisers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Turning valves on spray equipment is done at the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating hoists to place workpieces onto machine feed carriages
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hoists, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 8115/02
Source: “Operate hoists to place workpieces onto machine feed carriages.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Operating a hoist to load workpieces is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning containers to receive parts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: containers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 8115/02
Source: “Position containers to receive parts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Positioning containers is manual handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Replacing machine parts using hand tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: machine parts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 8115/02
Source: “Replace machine parts using hand tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Changing machine parts with hand tools is physical maintenance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Lubricating moving parts of conveyors to ensure smooth operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: parts of conveyors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 8115/02
Source: “Lubricate moving parts of conveyors to ensure smooth operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Oiling conveyor parts is done by hand at the conveyor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Moving equipment, material and waste using safe manual and mechanical handling techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, material and waste, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 8115/02
Source: “Move equipment, material, and waste using safe manual and mechanical handling techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Moving materials and waste is physical handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Replacing defective components or parts using hand tools and precision instruments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: defective components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 8115/02
Source: “Replace defective components or parts using hand tools and precision instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Replacing parts with hand tools and precision instruments is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £32,900a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 11,500in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: production schedules in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: reading production schedules to identify specifications and maintaining production records detailing quantities. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where equipment gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: cleaning and maintaining spraying equipment is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 3% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 2% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 95% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 52 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Reading production schedules to identify specifications is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to production schedules, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding: a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes: ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether equipment is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near determining work methods and machine setup requirements based on product specifications. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to metal making and treating process operatives (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was vehicle paint technicians: only about 20% of its durable work is work you already do. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 6/100 here, with only 3% of the task list in the top band, and “clean and maintain spraying equipment” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Vehicle paint technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “conduct visual quality checks”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 19% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 19% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Metal working machine operatives
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “position and feed materials into processing machines, by hand or by using automated equipment”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 14% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 14% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Chemical and related process operatives
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already adjust controls to set temperatures and speeds of coating machines and equipment, and their equivalent is to adjust equipment positions, speeds, timing, and material flows using controls. Across both published task lists that is about 5% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 3% of its task weight, across 52 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like cleaning and maintaining spraying equipment arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Extruding and Drawing Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Extruding and Drawing Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic, Rolling Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic, Metal-Refining Furnace Operators and Tenders, Pourers and Casters, Metal and Heat Treating Equipment Setters, Operators, and Tenders, Metal and Plastic. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

Why there is no community here

Collab365, who build this site, run paid Spaces for a small number of subjects, and none of them is built for this job. We are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

So the free services listed on this page are the whole answer, and it is the same answer we would give a friend.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for metal making / treating process operatives launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for metal making / treating process operatives yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for metal making / treating process operatives existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for metal making / treating process operatives launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Metal making and treating process operatives?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 52 official task statements scored for Metal making and treating process operatives (United Kingdom, SOC 8115), 3% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 6 out of 100 (range 5–11, band: minimal). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Metal making and treating process operatives” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Read production schedules to identify specifications for materials, cutting lines, and tolerances” (69/100, high); “Maintain production records detailing quantities, types, and dimensions of materials produced” (69/100, high); “Determine work methods and machine setup requirements based on product specifications” (51/100, partial). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Metal making and treating process operatives” stay human?: About 95% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Replace defective components or parts using hand tools and precision instruments” (0/100, minimal); “Move equipment, material, and waste using safe manual and mechanical handling techniques” (0/100, minimal); “Lubricate moving parts of conveyors to ensure smooth operation” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Metal making and treating process operatives” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 3% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 95% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Metal making and treating process operatives calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 52 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
20 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.