UK dataswitch to US
Playworkers
ensure play areas are safe and secure, assessing the risks and benefits of play activities for children and young people and keeping records on individual children. If that's your week, this page is about your job.
The honest answer
AI changes the edges of this job, not the middle: ensure play areas are safe and secure is work software can't reach.
What shifts is maintaining financial records and administration for play settings. This page scores what today's tools actually do, not headlines.
Your week, as this page understands it
Playworkers deliver and facilitate play opportunities for children in a range of formal and informal settings including play schemes, free play locations, and in pre- and after-school activities. The job title says “playworkers”. The real job is the part underneath: ensure play areas are safe and secure. That is the thing someone has to be right about.
The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But playworkers is not one task. It is 49 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is ensure play areas are safe and secure, and the ledger below shows exactly why.
Where the work sits, by task weight
- shifting to AI
- 2%
- changing shape
- 10%
- staying human
- 88%
These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.
Whole-job exposure score 15 out of 100 (11–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, across 49 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.
How we know this
What is measured: Every published task statement for playworkers is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.
How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.
Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.
Your job, task by task
These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.
Shifting to AI
1 taskTasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.
Maintaining financial records and administration for play settings
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Maintain financial records and administration for play settings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping the books and admin for a play setting is exactly the routine record work software already handles.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Changing shape
5 tasksTasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.
Assessing the risks and benefits of play activities for children and young people
The software now makes the first pass at the risks, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Assess the risks and benefits of play activities for children and young people.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weighing up the risks and benefits of a play activity follows a well documented playwork method that software can draft.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping records on individual children
The software now makes the first pass at records, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Keep records on individual children, including daily observations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up records and daily notes is paperwork, and software drafts it well once the observations exist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing and organising activity programmes for young people
The software now makes the first pass at activity programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Design and organise activity programmes for young people.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing up activity programmes is planning work on paper, and AI writes solid first versions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records of child observations for developmental assessments
The software now makes the first pass at accurate records of child observations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 6117/00Source: “Maintain accurate records of child observations for developmental assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up what a child was seen doing follows a familiar format, so software can draft the record once a playworker has watched them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records of child progress
The software now makes the first pass at accurate records of child progress, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 6117/00Source: “Maintain accurate records of child progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning notes about how a child is getting on into a tidy progress record is straightforward writing that software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Staying human
43 tasksTasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.
Ensure play areas are safe and secure
This work happens in the physical world: play areas are safe, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 6117/00Source: “Ensure play areas are safe and secure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping a play area safe means walking it, watching the children and moving hazards out of the way.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising children's activities in a safe environment
This work happens in the physical world: children's activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 6117/00Source: “Supervise children's activities in a safe environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising children means an adult being present and watching.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing and implementing recreational activities and outings to encourage play
This work happens in the physical world: recreational activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 6117/00Source: “Design and implement recreational activities and outings to encourage play.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: AI can plan varied activities and outings well, but someone has to be there running them with the children.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Facilitating the creation of play spaces that stimulate children's imagination
This work happens in the physical world: the creation of play spaces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 6117/00Source: “Facilitate the creation of play spaces that stimulate children's imagination.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Ideas for imaginative play spaces are easy to generate, but building and rearranging them with children is hands-on work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Show the other 39 tasks
Informing children's parents or guardians about daily activities
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles children's parents and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Inform children's parents or guardians about daily activities, behaviours, and related issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Daily updates are already largely sent through nursery apps, though the trickier conversations happen face to face.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to the development of others by participating in appraisal
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles the development and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Contribute to the development of others by participating in appraisal.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Appraisal notes and development points can be drafted, but the conversation itself is between colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advocating for children and young people's right to play in discussions with parents
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles children and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Advocate for children and young people's right to play in discussions with parents, carers, and professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can supply the arguments for children's right to play, but persuading a particular parent or social worker happens face to face.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engaging in activities for personal professional development
staying humanThe ratings behind this row put activities well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Engage in activities for personal professional development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Learning and developing professionally is something only the person themselves can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reflecting individually and as part of a team to improve Playwork practice
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Reflect individually and as part of a team to improve Playwork practice.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reflecting on practice draws on what staff saw and felt, though AI can help structure the write-up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising staff as part of general personnel functions
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Supervise staff as part of general personnel functions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Rotas and supervision paperwork can be produced, but managing people day to day stays human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating closely with parents and carers
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles parents and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Collaborate closely with parents and carers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Apps can draft updates for parents, but the working relationship rests on a person parents know and trust with their child.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying signs of emotional or developmental problems in children
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: signs of emotional, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Identify signs of emotional or developmental problems in children.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Child development milestones are well documented, but noticing that one particular child is struggling depends on watching them day to day.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Creating an inclusive and accessible environment for children and young people with diverse needs
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: an inclusive, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Create an inclusive and accessible environment for children and young people with diverse needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can suggest inclusive approaches, but making a setting genuinely welcoming happens through people in the room every day.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing children and young people's interactions during play to inform future planning
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Observe children and young people's interactions during play to inform future planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Planning can be drafted from notes, but the watching itself means being present while children play.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Incorporating loose parts in play spaces to foster sustainable attitudes
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: loose parts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 6117/00Source: “Incorporate loose parts in play spaces to foster sustainable attitudes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Choosing loose parts can be suggested, but putting them into the play space is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting regular health and safety checks of equipment
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: regular health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 6117/00Source: “Conduct regular health and safety checks of equipment, resources, and play structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The checklist can be produced automatically, but someone still has to walk round and physically test the swings and equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising and assisting children with their homework to enhance their understanding
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Supervise and assist children with their homework to enhance their understanding.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Homework help can be explained by software, but supervising children while they work means an adult in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding to first aid emergencies and reporting equipment theft
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: first aid emergencies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Respond to first aid emergencies and report equipment theft.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Dealing with a hurt child needs a person on the spot; only the written report afterwards could be produced automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Responding calmly to any accidents or emergencies during a Playwork session and recording appropriately
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: any accidents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Respond calmly to any accidents or emergencies during a Playwork session and record appropriately.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The response to an accident happens in person; only the written record afterwards could be drafted with help.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending or initiating measures for children to look after their own clothing and tidy up toys and books
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: measures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Recommend or initiate measures for children to look after their own clothing and tidy up toys and books.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Encouraging children to tidy up and mind their things works through an adult present in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing disciplinary measures to manage children's behaviour
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: disciplinary measures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Implement disciplinary measures to manage children's behaviour.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Managing a child's behaviour happens in the moment, in the room, with the adult the child knows.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing and maintaining positive relationships with parents
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: positive relationships, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Develop and maintain positive relationships with parents, carers, and professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Trust built with parents, carers and other professionals over time is the whole point, and that only forms between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Enhancing children and young people's self-directed play using appropriate intervention styles
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Enhance children and young people's self-directed play using appropriate intervention styles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Knowing when to step in or step back during children's play is a live judgement made in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Fostering the development of children and young people according to their culture
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: the development of children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Foster the development of children and young people according to their culture, age, and development stage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supporting how a child develops depends on being with them regularly and knowing them personally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting the development of a child's personal and social abilities
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: the development of a child's personal and social, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 6117/00Source: “Support the development of a child's personal and social abilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A child learns to get on with others through their relationship with a familiar adult who is there with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Discussing worries with children to provide support
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: worries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Discuss worries with children to provide support.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 2 out of 100 (0–6 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A worried child needs a trusted adult listening, which cannot be handed to a machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Developing playful yet professional relationships with children
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: playful yet professional relationships, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 6117/00Source: “Develop playful yet professional relationships with children.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building a real relationship with a child happens through play, in person, and the child being with a human is the whole point.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Setting up play areas for children
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: play areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 6117/00Source: “Set up play areas for children.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting out equipment and play spaces is hands-on work that has to happen in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning and maintaining all toys and play areas
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: all toys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Clean and maintain all toys and play areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Washing toys and tidying play areas is physical work done in the room itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Organising and storing toys and materials to ensure order in activity areas
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: toys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Organise and store toys and materials to ensure order in activity areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sorting and putting away toys and materials is physical tidying done in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Teaching age-appropriate activities, such as lap play, reading and arts and crafts, to children
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: age-appropriate activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 6117/00Source: “Teach age-appropriate activities, such as lap play, reading, and arts and crafts, to children.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Lap play, shared reading and crafts happen with an adult sitting alongside the child.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Caring for children who are disabled or have ill or disabled parents
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 6117/00Source: “Care for children who are disabled or have ill or disabled parents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Caring for a disabled child means being with them in person, doing things a screen simply cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Providing care and supporting for children in various institutional settings
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: care, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 6117/00Source: “Provide care and support for children in various institutional settings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Looking after children in a residential or play setting is hands-on, in-person work throughout.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Accompanying children to and from school
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Accompany children to and from school, outings, and medical appointments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking children places means physically going with them and keeping them safe.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Instructing children in health and personal habits
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Instruct children in health and personal habits, such as eating, resting, and toilet habits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching toddlers to eat, rest and use the toilet is hands-on guidance given alongside the child.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing and providing food for children and young people following health and wellbeing policies
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: food, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Prepare and provide food for children and young people following health and wellbeing policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cooking and serving food to children happens in a kitchen with real ingredients, even if menus can be planned automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reading to pupils in a class
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: pupils, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Read to pupils in a class, group, or one-to-one setting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Reading with a class or a child is done in the room with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Serving meals and refreshments to children
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: meals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 6117/00Source: “Serve meals and refreshments to children.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Serving meals and drinks to children means carrying and handing things over in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Assisting children with dressing in appropriate clothing
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Assist children with dressing in appropriate clothing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Helping a small child into their coat and shoes takes someone's hands, in the room, with the child.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Changing children's nappies
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children's nappies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Change children's nappies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Changing a nappy is hands-on care that can only be done by a person with the child in front of them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Preparing formula milk bottles for babies
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: formula milk bottles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Prepare formula milk bottles for babies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making up bottles means measuring, mixing and sterilising in a kitchen, which needs hands on the equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing formula milk for children in care settings
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: formula milk, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Prepare formula milk for children in care settings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preparing formula is a hands-on kitchen job done to strict hygiene steps by a person in the setting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Regulating children's rest periods and nap schedules
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: children's rest periods, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 6117/00Source: “Regulate children's rest periods and nap schedules.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence, and it moved between repeat runs, so the range is widened.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Settling children into naps and keeping to the schedule happens in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
What this job pays, and how many people do it
- Median pay
- No median pay figure is published for this exact group, so there is none here. We would rather show you the gap than a number borrowed from somewhere else.The ONS doesn't publish a reliable pay figure for this exact job (too few people in its survey sample), so none is shown here.
- People doing this job
- 18,200in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.
Why this is shifting
The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: financial records in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: maintaining financial records and administration for play settings and assessing the risks and benefits of play activities for children and young people. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where play areas are safe gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.
Your move
Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend
Start with what does not change: ensure play areas are safe and secure is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.
So, given all that: 2% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 10% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 88% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 49 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.
So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Maintaining financial records and administration for play settings is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.
This week: one thing
Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to financial records, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.
- What you end up holding
- a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
- How long it takes
- ten minutes
If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether play areas are safe is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.
Over the next 90 days
Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near assessing the risks and benefits of play activities for children and young people. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.
Over the next 12 months
On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.
The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them
I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.
I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to playworkers (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was early education and childcare assistants. This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 15/100 here, with only 2% of the task list in the top band, and “ensure play areas are safe and secure” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.
How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.
3 moves I checked and rejected
These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.
Early education and childcare assistants
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “support the development of a child's personal and social abilities”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 48% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
Houseparents and residential wardens
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “accompany children to and from school, outings, and medical appointments”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 35% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
Nannies and au pairs
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “accompany children to and from school, outings, and medical appointments”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 35% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: It is closer than most, and still not close enough: about 35% of that job's durable work is already yours, against the 35% I want to see before I will call something a route. This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
What I’d stop worrying about
A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.
The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 2% of its task weight, across 49 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like ensure play areas are safe and secure arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.
You are reading the United Kingdom figures
The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which First-Line Supervisors of Entertainment and Recreation Workers, Except Gambling Services is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.
Switch to the United States page →partial match
The other groups this work is counted across:
In US official statistics this job is counted as First-Line Supervisors of Entertainment and Recreation Workers, Except Gambling Services, First-Line Supervisors of Personal Service Workers and Childcare Workers. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.
Your route through this
Where to go next, and what it costs
Free, and complete
The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.
In England:
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
In Wales:
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded
Why there is no community here
Collab365, who build this site, run paid Spaces for a small number of subjects, and none of them is built for this job. We are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.
So the free services listed on this page are the whole answer, and it is the same answer we would give a friend.
Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for playworkers launches. Nothing else.
That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.
We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.
No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.
Questions people ask about this job
- Will AI replace Playworkers?
- Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 49 official task statements scored for Playworkers (United Kingdom, SOC 6117), 2% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 15 out of 100 (range 11–20, band: minimal). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
- Which tasks in “Playworkers” can AI already do?
- The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain financial records and administration for play settings” (81/100, very high); “Assess the risks and benefits of play activities for children and young people” (56/100, partial); “Keep records on individual children, including daily observations” (56/100, partial). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
- Which tasks in “Playworkers” stay human?
- About 88% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Regulate children's rest periods and nap schedules” (0/100, minimal); “Prepare formula milk for children in care settings” (0/100, minimal); “Prepare formula milk bottles for babies” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
- What should someone working in “Playworkers” do about AI?
- Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 2% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 88% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
- How is the AI exposure score for Playworkers calculated?
- Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 49 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.
Where these numbers come from
About the data on this page
- The ONS doesn't publish a reliable pay figure for this exact job (too few people in its survey sample), so none is shown here.
- This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
- One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
- The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
- 22 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
- ASHE suppresses or does not publish a median for this unit group. We leave it empty rather than interpolating one from sibling groups, which would be a fabricated number.
- Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.
- Task statements
- gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
- Task weights
- gaisi-index (relatedness)
- Scores
- Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
- Pay and employment
- no pay figure published for this groupnomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))
Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.
The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.
The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.
Using these figures?
Cite this
Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.
Plain text
Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).
BibTeX
@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
title = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
author = {{Collab365}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
note = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published . Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.