Futureproof
Menu

UK dataswitch to US

Waiters and waitresses

ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard, preparing and serving beverages and presenting guests with menus and wine lists. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI changes the edges of this job, not the middle: ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard is work software can't reach.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

What shifts is preparing bills that itemise and total meal costs and sales taxes. This page scores what today's tools actually do, not headlines.

Your week, as this page understands it

Waiters and waitresses serve food and beverages in hotels, clubs, restaurants public houses and other establishments. The job title says “waiters” or “waitresses”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But waiters and waitresses is not one task. It is 49 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI
2%
changing shape
6%
staying human
92%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 13 out of 100 (10–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, across 49 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for waiters and waitresses is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

Shifting to AI

1 task

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

  • Preparing bills that itemise and total meal costs and sales taxes

    This is reading one thing and writing another: bills in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Prepare bills that itemise and total meal costs and sales taxes.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Tills itemise and total bills automatically, which is one of the oldest jobs computers do in restaurants.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

3 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

  • Answering phones to take bookings under host or hostess direction

    The software now makes the first pass at phones, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.

    importance 75 · 9264/00
    Source: “Answer phones to take bookings under host or hostess direction.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 59 out of 100 (52–66 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Online booking systems and automated phone answering already take restaurant reservations.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Answering phone enquiries and providing relevant information or assistance

    The software now makes the first pass at phone enquiries, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.

    importance 70 · 9264/00
    Source: “Answer phone enquiries and provide relevant information or assistance.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 59 out of 100 (52–66 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Answering routine phone enquiries about opening times, menus and directions is well handled by automated systems.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Receiving and recording patrons' dining reservations

    The software now makes the first pass at patrons' dining reservations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.

    importance 70 · 9264/00
    Source: “Receive and record patrons' dining reservations.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 59 out of 100 (52–66 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Taking and recording a reservation is data entry that online booking systems already do.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

45 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

  • Ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard

    This work happens in the physical world: each stage of food, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 95 · 9264/00
    Source: “Ensure each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard, including customer arrival, provision of information, taking orders, serving food and drink, and taking payments.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Running every stage of table service, from welcome to payment, means being in the room with the guests.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Serving food and drinks to guests

    This work happens in the physical world: food, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 95 · 9264/00
    Source: “Serve food and drinks to guests.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Carrying food and drink to a table is physical work in the restaurant.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Answering questions about the menu

    This work happens in the physical world: questions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9264/00
    Source: “Answer questions about the menu.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Menu apps already answer most of these questions, though guests usually ask whoever is standing at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Providing excellent customer service by understanding the needs and expectations of customers

    This work happens in the physical world: excellent customer service, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9264/00
    Source: “Provide excellent customer service by understanding the needs and expectations of customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Good service here comes from reading the customer standing in front of you.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Delivering good customer service by responding swiftly to client queries and concerns

    This work happens in the physical world: good customer service, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9264/00
    Source: “Deliver good customer service by responding swiftly to client queries and concerns.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Sorting out a guest's problem quickly usually means noticing it and dealing with it there at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Taking food and drink orders from customers

    This work happens in the physical world: food, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9264/00
    Source: “Take food and drink orders from customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Orders are usually taken face to face at the counter, though ordering systems already handle the routine part.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 39 tasks

  • Allocating customers to tables suitable for their needs and according to rotation so that servers receive an appropriate number of seatings

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Allocate customers to tables suitable for their needs and according to rotation so that servers receive an appropriate number of seatings.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Booking systems already allocate tables by size, need and server rotation, though someone reads the room as it fills.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Describing menu items to customers

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: menu items, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Describe menu items to customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Describing dishes is straightforward once the menu is written down, though guests ask whoever is at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Writing customers' food orders on order slips for kitchen staff

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers' food orders, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Write customers' food orders on order slips for kitchen staff.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Handheld tills and guest ordering apps already capture orders and send them to the kitchen.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Recommending wines to customers

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: wines, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 65 · 9264/00
    Source: “Recommend wines to customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Wine pairing is very well documented, though a recommendation at the table also depends on reading the guest.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

  • Providing advice on ingredient selection to enhance customer dining experience

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: advice, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 75 · 9264/00
    Source: “Provide advice on ingredient selection to enhance customer dining experience.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Ingredient and allergen information is documented, but the server at the table is accountable for getting it right.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Providing guests with information about local areas

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: guests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9264/00
    Source: “Provide guests with information about local areas, including directions.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Local directions and tips are exactly the sort of public information software gives well, though guests ask in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

  • Communicating with customers to address their needs

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Communicate with customers to address their needs.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Serving a customer at the counter happens face to face.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Obtaining and handling client feedback

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: client feedback, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 75 · 9264/00
    Source: “Obtain and handle client feedback, both positive and negative, to improve the business's services.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Collecting and sorting feedback automates well, but hearing a complaint in person does not.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Accepting bill payments

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: bill payments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Accept bill payments.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Card readers and pay-at-table apps handle much of this, but the machine still has to reach the guest.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Collecting payments from customers

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: payments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Collect payments from customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Settling the bill happens at the table with the customer, although the card payment itself is already handled automatically.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

  • Preparing and organising own work

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: own work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Prepare and organise own work, following business/brand guidelines and procedures, meeting agreed deadlines.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Organising your own shift work happens on the restaurant floor, judging what needs doing next.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Informing customers of daily specials

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers of daily specials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Inform customers of daily specials.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (1–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence, and it moved between repeat runs, so the range is widened.

    Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Telling diners about the day's specials is simple information, delivered in person at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Training food and beverage service staff

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: food, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9264/00
    Source: “Train food and beverage service staff.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Training service staff means showing them on the floor during real service, not just handing over notes.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Verifying customer satisfaction with their meals and addressing any issues

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customer satisfaction, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Verify customer satisfaction with their meals and address any issues.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Checking back on a table means reading faces and body language while standing beside the guests.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Taking and preparing takeaway orders

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: takeaway orders, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 75 · 9264/00
    Source: “Take and prepare takeaway orders.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Taking the order could be automated, but making the food up is hands-on.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Resolving customer complaints about dining experiences

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customer complaints, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Resolve customer complaints about dining experiences.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Putting right a spoiled meal depends on reading an unhappy guest and winning them back at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Using clear and engaging communication to establish a good rapport with customers and ask relevant questions to determine their needs

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: clear, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Use clear and engaging communication to establish a good rapport with customers and ask relevant questions to determine their needs.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Building rapport with a customer happens face to face in the moment.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Clearing tables after customer

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: tables after customer, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9264/00
    Source: “Clear tables after customer use.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Clearing tables is hands-on work in the dining room.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Greeting guests entering the dining area

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: guests entering the dining area, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9264/00
    Source: “Greet guests entering the dining area.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Welcoming someone through the door needs a person standing there.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Cleaning tables after customers have finished dining

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: tables after customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Clean tables after customers have finished dining.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Wiping down tables is physical cleaning work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Greeting and seating customers

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Greet and seat customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Greeting people and walking them to a table needs someone in the room.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Greeting seat and thank guests under host or hostess direction

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: seat, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Greet, seat, and thank guests under host or hostess direction.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Meeting, seating and thanking guests all happen face to face in the restaurant.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Preparing and serving beverages, such as coffee or soft drinks

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: beverages, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Prepare and serve beverages, such as coffee or soft drinks.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Making and carrying drinks is physical work behind the bar and at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Presenting guests with menus and wine lists

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: guests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Present guests with menus and wine lists.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Handing menus and wine lists to guests means being at the table.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Serving customers to ensure their satisfaction with products and services

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Serve customers to ensure their satisfaction with products and services.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Looking after customers at the counter needs someone there in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Setting up and keeping all eating and serving areas clean and tidy

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: and keeping, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Set up and keep all eating and serving areas clean and tidy.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Setting up and cleaning dining areas is physical work on site.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Showing people to their seats

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: people, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 85 · 9264/00
    Source: “Show people to their seats.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Walking guests to their seats needs a person in the room.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Setting tables with clean linens

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: tables, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Set tables with clean linens, condiments, or other supplies.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Laying tables with linen and condiments is hands-on preparation work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Stocking customer service stations with paper products or beverage preparation items

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customer service stations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9264/00
    Source: “Stock customer service stations with paper products or beverage preparation items.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Stocking stations with cups, napkins and drink items is manual work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Setting up dining areas to prepare for the next shift or large parties

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: dining areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 75 · 9264/00
    Source: “Set up dining areas to prepare for the next shift or large parties.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Setting up a dining room for the next service is physical preparation.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Filling containers with salt, pepper, sugar and cream

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: containers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9264/00
    Source: “Fill containers with salt, pepper, sugar, and cream.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Refilling condiment containers is hands-on preparation work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Portioning desserts for service

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: desserts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9264/00
    Source: “Portion desserts for service.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Portioning desserts means handling food in the kitchen.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Sweeping floors

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: floors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9264/00
    Source: “Sweep floors.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Sweeping floors is physical work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Verifying customers' identification to ensure age requirements for alcohol purchase are met

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers' identification, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9264/00
    Source: “Verify customers' identification to ensure age requirements for alcohol purchase are met.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.

    The rating behind it: Checking someone's ID before serving alcohol means looking at the document, and the law holds the server responsible.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Brewing coffee and tea for guests

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: coffee, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9264/00
    Source: “Brew coffee and tea for guests.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Brewing coffee and tea is hands-on work with the equipment.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Garnishing and decorating dishes in preparation for serving

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: dishes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9264/00
    Source: “Garnish and decorate dishes in preparation for serving.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Garnishing and plating dishes means handling food by hand.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Preparing food and carry out basic cooking tasks

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: food, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9264/00
    Source: “Prepare food and carry out basic cooking tasks.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Preparing and cooking food is physical kitchen work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Taking out rubbish and checking and cleaning bathrooms

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: rubbish, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9264/00
    Source: “Take out rubbish and check and clean bathrooms.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Taking out rubbish and cleaning bathrooms is physical work on the premises.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Chilling bottles of wine

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: bottles of wine, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9264/00
    Source: “Chill bottles of wine.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Chilling wine means physically putting bottles somewhere cold.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay
£22,900a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this

Source: ashe-t14

Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)

Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.

People doing this job
259,800in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: bills in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: preparing bills that itemise and total meal costs and sales taxes and answering phones to take bookings under host or hostess direction. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where each stage of food gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 2% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 6% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 92% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 49 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Preparing bills that itemise and total meal costs and sales taxes is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to bills, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding
a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes
ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether each stage of food is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near answering phones to take bookings under host or hostess direction. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to waiters and waitresses (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was coffee shop workers: only about 34% of its durable work is work you already do. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 13/100 here, with only 2% of the task list in the top band, and “ensure each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

  • Coffee shop workers

    Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “ensure each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 34% of the work in that job the software is not taking.

    Why I am not recommending it: It is closer than most, and still not close enough: about 34% of that job's durable work is already yours, against the 35% I want to see before I will call something a route.

    Look at that job’s page anyway →

  • Bar staff

    Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “ensure each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 29% of the work in that job the software is not taking.

    Why I am not recommending it: It is closer than most, and still not close enough: about 29% of that job's durable work is already yours, against the 35% I want to see before I will call something a route.

    Look at that job’s page anyway →

  • Sales administrators

    Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “use clear and engaging communication to establish a good rapport with customers and ask relevant questions…”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 23% of the work in that job the software is not taking.

    Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 23% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.

    Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

  • The headline number you read somewhere

    The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 2% of its task weight, across 49 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.

  • The headlines about your trade disappearing

    They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like ensuring each stage of food and beverage service meets business/brand standard arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.

  • Retraining out of a job that is holding up

    On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.

  • The “obvious” next job everyone suggests

    I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Waiters and Waitresses is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Waiters and Waitresses and Food Servers, Nonrestaurant. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

Why there is no community here

Collab365, who build this site, run paid Spaces for a small number of subjects, and none of them is built for this job. We are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

So the free services listed on this page are the whole answer, and it is the same answer we would give a friend.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for waiters / waitresses launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for waiters / waitresses yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for waiters / waitresses existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for waiters / waitresses launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Waiters and waitresses?
Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 49 official task statements scored for Waiters and waitresses (United Kingdom, SOC 9264), 2% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 13 out of 100 (range 10–19, band: minimal). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Waiters and waitresses” can AI already do?
The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Prepare bills that itemise and total meal costs and sales taxes” (69/100, high); “Answer phones to take bookings under host or hostess direction” (59/100, partial); “Answer phone enquiries and provide relevant information or assistance” (59/100, partial). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Waiters and waitresses” stay human?
About 92% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Chill bottles of wine” (0/100, minimal); “Take out rubbish and check and clean bathrooms” (0/100, minimal); “Prepare food and carry out basic cooking tasks” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Waiters and waitresses” do about AI?
Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 2% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 92% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Waiters and waitresses calculated?
Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 49 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

  • Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
  • This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
  • One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
  • The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
  • 16 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
  • Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.
Task statements
gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights
gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores
Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment
ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a jobDownload this releaseLook up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published . Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.