Will AI replace CAD, drawing and architectural technicians?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 134 official task statements scored for CAD, drawing and architectural technicians (United Kingdom, SOC 3120), 51% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 56 out of 100 (range 51–62, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “CAD, drawing and architectural technicians” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Assign identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking” (93/100, very high); “Record calculated figures on architectural materials lists for project documentation” (93/100, very high); “Calculate product costings from raw materials and manufacturing costs for profitability” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “CAD, drawing and architectural technicians” stay human?

About 24% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conduct site visits and surveys when required” (0/100, minimal); “Reproduce working drawings on photocopiers” (0/100, minimal); “Visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “CAD, drawing and architectural technicians” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 51% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 24% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for CAD, drawing and architectural technicians calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 134 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

CAD, drawing and architectural technicians

analysing data from aerial photography, maintaining and securing geospatial data to ensure data integrity and confidentiality and calculating the volume of space to be filled and the required materials. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: assigning identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 51%
changing shape: 25%
staying human: 24%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 56 out of 100 (51–62 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 134 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for cad, drawing and architectural technicians is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. The ledger below shows which rows you can move toward.

Your week, as this page understands it

CAD, drawing and architectural technicians design and prepare technical drawings, plans, maps, charts and similar items and install, operate and maintain 3D printers. The job title says “cad”, “drawing” or “architectural technicians”: officially one job, several names. The real job is the part underneath: supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But cad, drawing and architectural technicians is not one task. It is 134 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 51%
changing shape: 25%
staying human: 24%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

34 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

64 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Creating designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design
It is the same call made over and over on designs, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 90 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Create designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design (CAD) software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software generates drawings and design options quickly, though real projects still need substantial reworking by a technician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing accurate, detailed and to scale drawings
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Provide accurate, detailed and to scale drawings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing accurate scale drawings is drafting work that design software already does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drafting plans and detailed drawings for construction projects from sketches or notes
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Draft plans and detailed drawings for construction projects from sketches or notes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning sketches and notes into proper construction drawings is well-documented conversion work software increasingly does to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing specifications, sketches and drawings to assess factors affecting component designs
This is reading one thing and writing another: specifications, sketches and drawings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Review specifications, sketches, and drawings to assess factors affecting component designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing drawings and specifications to spot what affects a component is document work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

37 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Creating building plans using CAD software
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 3120/01
Source: “Create building plans using CAD software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 57 out of 100 (50–64 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software drafts building plans quickly, but they need real rework before submission, and approval rests with building control.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using computer software to create architectural design plans and 3D models
The software now makes the first pass at computer software, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3120/01
Source: “Use computer software to create architectural design plans and 3D models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can generate plans and models quickly, though turning them into something buildable still needs a technician’s eye.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and compiling data to complete architectural designs
The software now makes the first pass at data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3120/01
Source: “Collect and compile data to complete architectural designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and organising the data behind a design is mostly desk work, though some information has to be collected on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

33 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks
The value here is that a specific person handles CAD technicians and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Supervise engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Checking and guiding technicians' drawing work depends on an experienced person coaching them directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Tracing finished drawings onto designated paper for blueprint reproduction
This work happens in the physical world: finished drawings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Trace finished drawings onto designated paper for blueprint reproduction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Tracing drawings onto paper by hand is manual work, even though the drawing itself is already digital elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Reproducing working drawings on photocopiers
This work happens in the physical world: drawings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Reproduce working drawings on photocopiers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running drawings through a photocopier is physical work at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 124 tasks

Assigning identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: identification numbers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01, 3120/02
Source: “Assign identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Giving materials tracking numbers under a set system is routine record-keeping that software does faster and more consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording calculated figures on architectural materials lists for project documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: calculated figures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Record calculated figures on architectural materials lists for project documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing calculated figures onto materials lists is routine record-keeping that software does faster and with fewer mistakes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating product costings from raw materials and manufacturing costs for profitability
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: product costings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Calculate product costings from raw materials and manufacturing costs for profitability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Product costing from ingredient and manufacturing costs is spreadsheet arithmetic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collating data provided by remote sensing techniques
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Collate data provided by remote sensing techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Collating remote sensing outputs into usable datasets is routine data processing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and correcting data inaccuracies or mistakes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data inaccuracies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Identify and correct data inaccuracies or mistakes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding and correcting data errors is checking work software does faster and more consistently than people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Scaling and orienting identified features using standard mathematical formulas
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: identified features in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Scale and orient identified features using standard mathematical formulas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Scaling and orienting features with standard formulas is straightforward calculation software performs accurately every time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using desktop publishing software to edit and formulate information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: desktop publishing software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Use desktop publishing software to edit and formulate information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Laying out and editing information in publishing software is routine document production.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping accurate records of different versions of design work
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records of different versions of design work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Keep accurate records of different versions of design work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Version records are exactly the kind of tracking that software keeps accurately without help.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating online databases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: online databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Update online databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Updating records in an online database is routine data entry that software already does automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing contracts for specific projects under an architect's or engineer's supervision
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: contracts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Prepare contracts for specific projects under an architect's or engineer's supervision.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project contracts are built from standard published forms, which software fills out to a standard an architect or engineer will accept.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using mathematical and computer models to complete design and specification calculations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: mathematical in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Use mathematical and computer models to complete design and specification calculations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design and specification calculations follow set methods that software applies reliably, with an engineer checking the result separately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing architectural culture, theory and designing to present a personal viewpoint in a structured argument
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: architectural culture, theory in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Analyse architectural culture, theory, and design to present a personal viewpoint in a structured argument.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Architectural theory and criticism is abundantly published, so software can build a structured argument, though the viewpoint should be a person’s.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Estimating the quantity and type of materials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the quantity in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Estimate the quantity and type of materials needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out quantities and material types from a design is calculation work that software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating digital maps using geographic information system
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: digital maps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Create digital maps using geographic information system (GIS) technology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Making digital maps in mapping software is well-documented work that automated tools already do very capably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using geographical information systems, GIS) for spatial data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geographical information systems, gis) in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02, 3120/03
Source: “Use geographical information systems (GIS) for spatial data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spatial analysis in mapping software follows documented methods and is strongly supported by automated tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing data from aerial photography
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 3120/03
Source: “Analyse data from aerial photography, satellite surveys, and laser beam measuring systems to support geographical mapping.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting aerial, satellite and laser data is image and data analysis, an area where automated tools are strong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting research for map content
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Conduct research for map content.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching what should go on a map is reading and checking published sources, which software does fast.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing geospatial information databases to support accurate map creation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geospatial information databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Develop geospatial information databases to support accurate map creation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building geographic databases uses documented tools and query languages with abundant published guidance available.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Compiling aerial photographs, survey notes, records and original maps for map preparation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: aerial photographs, survey notes, records and original maps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Compile aerial photographs, survey notes, records, and original maps for map preparation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering photographs, notes, records and old maps into a usable set for mapping is organising work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining and securing geospatial data to ensure data integrity and confidentiality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geospatial data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Maintain and secure geospatial data to ensure data integrity and confidentiality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Looking after geospatial data and keeping it secure is well-documented data management work software largely handles.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Compiling and producing graphs on computers for specialist and general users
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: graphs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Compile and produce graphs on computers for specialist and general users.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing graphs on a computer is one of the most routine things software does, for any audience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining the integrity and accuracy of GI databases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the integrity in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Maintain the integrity and accuracy of GI databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping geographic databases accurate and consistent is exactly the sort of checking software does tirelessly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Searching legal records, survey records and land titles to obtain information about property boundaries in areas
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal records, survey records and land titles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Search legal records, survey records, and land titles to obtain information about property boundaries in areas to be surveyed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Land registry and survey records are searchable online and software retrieves them well, though boundary details often need careful interpretation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing technical information to develop detailed project plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Analyse technical information to develop detailed project plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading technical information and turning it into a detailed project plan is structured desk work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing detailed designs and specifications for projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed designs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Prepare detailed designs and specifications for projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Detailed designs and specifications follow documented conventions tools draft well, with a specialist confirming details.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining a method of presentation to graphically represent building plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a method of presentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Determine a method of presentation to graphically represent building plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing how to present building plans graphically follows well established conventions that software applies quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing network diagrams, floor plans or site configurations for facilities using CAD software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: network diagrams, floor plans or site configurations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Prepare network diagrams, floor plans, or site configurations for facilities using CAD software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing floor plans and site configurations in drawing software is well documented work that tools now do largely automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching and investigating relevant information to support project development and meet client and regulatory requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: relevant information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Research and investigate relevant information to support project development and meet client and regulatory requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Research to meet client and regulatory requirements is reading and summarising published material, which software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating the volume of space to be filled and the required materials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the volume of space in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Calculate the volume of space to be filled and the required materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out volumes and the materials needed is calculation from drawings, which software now does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining product specifications and materials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: product specifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Determine product specifications and materials according to blueprints, instructions, drawings, or work orders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading blueprints and work orders to set out specifications and materials is structured desk work software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reading and interpreting technical data for product development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Read and interpret technical data for product development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading and interpreting technical data for product development is squarely the kind of task software now does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sourcing, reviewing and interpreting data and technical information for building services engineering solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Source, review, and interpret data and technical information for building services engineering solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding, checking and interpreting technical information is research and analysis that software does quickly and thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing topographic or contour maps of surveyed land
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: topographic in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/01, 3120/03
Source: “Prepare topographic or contour maps of surveyed land, including site features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning survey measurements into topographic and contour maps is largely automated by mapping software already.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating excavation tonnage for use in earth-moving operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: excavation tonnage in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/01
Source: “Calculate excavation tonnage for use in earth-moving operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Excavation tonnage comes from survey data and standard formulas, which software calculates quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing graphs and fill-hauling diagrams for earth-moving operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: graphs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/01
Source: “Prepare graphs and fill-hauling diagrams for earth-moving operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing graphs and haul diagrams from earthworks data is chart-making that software handles end to end.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating technical or other drawings and plans for products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical or other drawings and plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/02
Source: “Create technical or other drawings and plans for products as needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing technical drawings and plans for products is well documented drawing work that software now does to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing related data to determine procedures and instructions for component designs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: related data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Analyse related data to determine procedures and instructions for component designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data to write procedures and instructions for a component is structured desk work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting technical specifications, digital information to identify project requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical specifications, digital information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Interpret technical specifications including digital information to identify project requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading specifications and digital drawings to pull out requirements is document work AI does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing installation and manufacturing documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: installation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Produce installation and manufacturing documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Installation and manufacturing documentation follows set formats using information already recorded, so software drafts it well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drawing illustrations for reference manuals and technical publications of mechanical systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: illustrations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Draw illustrations for reference manuals and technical publications of mechanical systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical illustrations for manuals follow clear conventions and existing drawings, so software now produces usable versions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records accurate is routine screen work software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Positioning instructions and comments onto drawings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: instructions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Position instructions and comments onto drawings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Adding notes and instructions to drawings is repetitive annotation work that drawing software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and evaluating mappable information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: mappable information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Analyse and evaluate mappable information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing information that can be mapped is data work with well established methods that software applies quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Comparing topographical features with images from aerial photographs and maps to verify their accuracy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: topographical features in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Compare topographical features with images from aerial photographs and maps to verify their accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing aerial photographs against maps to check accuracy is image matching that software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Building and maintaining databases to support organisational operations and data management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Build and maintain databases to support organisational operations and data management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software writes most database code, but how a business's data should be structured is a design decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports required for map preparation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Prepare reports required for map preparation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reports supporting map preparation follow familiar formats using data already gathered, so software drafts them well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs for budgeting and financial planning
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Estimate costs for budgeting and financial planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost estimates are built from price lists and past figures, which software is good at pulling together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Complying with national and local policies and legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: national in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Comply with national and local policies and legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Policies and legislation are published and software is good at checking work against written rules.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating weights and their implications for technical aspects of designs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: weights in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Calculate weights and their implications for technical aspects of designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weight calculations follow set formulas software applies accurately, with an engineer responsible for accepting the numbers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating how building regulations and site requirements affect architectural designs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: how building regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Evaluate how building regulations and site requirements affect architectural designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building regulations are published in detail, so software can work through how they affect a design for a person to confirm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring solutions adhere to engineering specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: solutions adhere in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Ensure solutions adhere to engineering specifications, codes of practice, regulations, standards, and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking a solution against published codes and standards is exactly the kind of comparison software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out calculations and analysing outputs for building services engineering
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: calculations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Carry out calculations and analyse outputs for building services engineering.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building services calculations follow published methods software applies well, with an engineer accountable for accepting the outputs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing the preparation of regulatory body applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the preparation of regulatory body applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Oversee the preparation of regulatory body applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulatory applications follow set forms and published requirements, so software can prepare them for a responsible person to submit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring drawings are compliant with industry and health and safety standards and protocols
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: drawings are compliant in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/02, 3120/03
Source: “Ensure drawings are compliant with industry and health and safety standards and protocols.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking drawings against industry and safety standards is a comparison task software does thoroughly, with a person accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and rectifying inaccuracies or discrepancies in engineering drawings and specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: inaccuracies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Identify and rectify inaccuracies or discrepancies in engineering drawings and specifications, ensuring the integrity of design outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking drawings and specifications for clashes and errors is exactly the kind of systematic comparison software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying the accuracy and scale of maps and charts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the accuracy in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3120/02, 3120/03
Source: “Verify the accuracy and scale of maps and charts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking maps and charts for accuracy and correct scale is comparison work software does thoroughly, with a person signing it off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Revising existing maps and charts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: maps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Revise existing maps and charts, making all necessary corrections and adjustments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Updating maps with corrections is largely automated database work, with a specialist confirming the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing three-dimensional models using computer-aided design
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on three-dimensional models, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 90 · 3120/02
Source: “Produce three-dimensional models using computer-aided design (CAD) software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can produce usable 3D models, but turning them into something a technician would sign off still takes substantial rework.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing manufacturing components using CAD software
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on components, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Design manufacturing components using CAD software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can produce component designs, but making them manufacturable still takes substantial rework by a technician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing strategic advice and recommendations based on geospatial data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: strategic advice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Provide strategic advice and recommendations based on geospatial data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing geospatial data and writing up recommendations is well-documented analytical work that software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating freehand drawings to accompany other drawings
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at freehand drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Create freehand drawings to accompany other drawings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sketches to support a drawing can now be generated, though a designer’s hand still communicates ideas in a way tools struggle to match.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing their own professional development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at their own professional development, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 3120/01
Source: “Manage their own professional development, keeping up to date with technical knowledge and skills, and recording these through CPD records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The record-keeping side is easy to automate, but the point of continuing development is the person's own learning.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Revising designs using CAD software to minimise production issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Revise designs using CAD software to minimise production issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Revising a design to avoid production problems is partly documented practice and partly experience of what actually goes wrong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing scale or full-size blueprints of specialty items like furniture and car components
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scale, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Design scale or full-size blueprints of specialty items like furniture and car components.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Detailed drawings for furniture or car parts can be drafted by software, though a designer refines them to be makeable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing specifications for mechanical equipment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specifications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Develop specifications for mechanical equipment, dies, tools, and controls using CAD equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Specifying tooling and controls in drawing software is documented work tools support, though specialist judgement shapes the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting design sketches, specifications or drawings to create accurate maps
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at design sketches, specifications or drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Interpret design sketches, specifications, or drawings to create accurate maps.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning sketches and specifications into an accurate map needs interpretation software supports but does not fully replace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating information using colour, symbols and style
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Communicate information using colour, symbols and style.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Colour, symbols and style follow published cartographic conventions, though the judgement about clarity stays with the mapmaker.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Deciding on the content to appear on a map
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the content, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Decide on the content to appear on a map.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deciding what belongs on a map is an editorial judgement about the reader, which software can only propose.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting aerial photographic techniques and plotting equipment to meet accuracy standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at aerial photographic techniques, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Select aerial photographic techniques and plotting equipment to meet accuracy standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing photographic techniques and equipment for an accuracy target relies on specialist experience software can only inform.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Measuring materials for project specifications to ensure design accuracy and compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at materials, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Measure materials for project specifications to ensure design accuracy and compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Quantities are now largely measured from digital models, which software does accurately, though site checks are sometimes needed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Measure materials for project specifications to support accurate modelling and design
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at materials, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3120/02
Source: “Measure materials for project specifications to support accurate modelling and design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measuring for specifications is mostly taken off digital models now, which software does accurately, with occasional physical checks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting working drawings for use in all stages of the project
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Present working drawings for use in all stages of the project, tender, manufacture/construction and installation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing and issuing working drawings for each project stage is documented production work software largely handles.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Capturing, maintaining and output digital geographic data
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at output digital geographic data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Capture, maintain and output digital geographic data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Handling and outputting digital geographic data is standard software work, though capture sometimes happens in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying geodetic points, elevations and planimetric or topographic features
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at geodetic points, elevations and planimetric or topographic features, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Identify geodetic points, elevations, and planimetric or topographic features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Picking out control points, levels and mapped features from survey data is pattern recognition software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying mitigate and reporting risks and hazards to create a safe working environment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at mitigate, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Identify, mitigate, and report risks and hazards to create a safe working environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 54 out of 100 (47–61 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk and hazard assessment follows published methods and is easy to document, though spotting hazards can mean being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Planning layouts for structural architectural projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at layouts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3120/01
Source: “Plan layouts for structural architectural projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Structural layouts follow documented rules software can draft, but a qualified person carries responsibility for the final arrangement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing drawings and documents for landscape schemes from concept to detailed design
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Prepare drawings and documents for landscape schemes from concept to detailed design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Landscape drawings follow documented conventions software can draft, though a designer shapes the scheme and stands behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing building services engineering solutions to technical issues by preparing engineering diagrams and documents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at services engineering solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Propose building services engineering solutions to technical issues by preparing engineering diagrams and documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing engineering diagrams and documents to solve a technical issue is well documented work software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating comprehensive engineering designs and drawings for various components
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at comprehensive engineering designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3120/02
Source: “Generate comprehensive engineering designs and drawings for various components, structures, and systems used in industrial and commercial construction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Draft engineering designs can be generated, but comprehensive construction designs need heavy expert rework before an engineer will approve them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Laying out and drawing schematic
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at and drawing schematic, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Lay out and draw schematic, orthographic, or angle views to depict functional relationships of components, assemblies, systems, and machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Schematic and orthographic views follow strict conventions software can apply, though laying out a complex assembly still needs skill.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modifying designs to improve safety features
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Modify designs to improve safety features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Safety improvements draw on published guidance software can apply, though a responsible person must accept the change.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Altering these materials using stereoscopic plotting and computer graphics equipment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at these materials, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Alter these materials using stereoscopic plotting and computer graphics equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Altering imagery on specialist plotting and graphics equipment needs trained operation, though the software side keeps getting stronger.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Determining guidelines that specify which source material is acceptable
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at guidelines, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Determine guidelines that specify which source material is acceptable for use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deciding which sources are good enough is a judgment call about accuracy and provenance that an organization owns.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating energy losses for buildings using computers and analytical equipment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at energy losses, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Calculate energy losses for buildings using computers and analytical equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Energy loss calculations follow published methods and standard software, though readings and assumptions need checking against the real building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating technical designs by hand for initial drafts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Create technical designs by hand for initial drafts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Initial drafts drawn by hand are manual work, though software can now produce equivalent early concepts on screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering specialised technical guidance to colleagues and teams in related projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specialised technical guidance, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Offer specialised technical guidance to colleagues and teams in related projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can supply the technical answer, but colleagues come to a trusted specialist for guidance they can act on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying theories, practices and technologies of the arts to influence architectural design
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at theories, practices and technologies of the arts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Apply theories, practices, and technologies of the arts to influence architectural design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Bringing artistic ideas into architectural design is creative judgement; software offers material but the original thinking is human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to organisational policies on equality
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisational policies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 3120/01
Source: “Adhere to organisational policies on equality, diversity, and inclusion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Following the organisation’s equality policies is something a person does rather than a document to be produced.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with other workers to resolve design or other problems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at other workers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Consult with other workers to resolve design or other problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can suggest fixes, but resolving a design clash usually means talking it through with the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with other workers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at other workers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Coordinate with other workers to design, lay out, or detail components and systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Detailing components across a team is coordination work where people agree who does what and when.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with engineers, designers and project staff
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at engineers, designers and project staff, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Communicate with engineers, designers, and project staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping engineers, designers and project staff informed is conversation, where trust and shared history matter more than documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with suppliers and clients for map production
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at suppliers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Coordinate with suppliers and clients for map production.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating suppliers and clients through map production is relationship and negotiation work rather than document production.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with clients to identify their requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Liaise with clients to identify their requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Drawing out what a client actually needs happens in conversation with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing projects and programmes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at projects, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Manage projects and programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Plans and tracking can be automated, but running a programme depends on the people delivering it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing project designs with consideration for environmental context and sustainability
staying human
The ratings behind this row put project designs well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Develop project designs with consideration for environmental context and sustainability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing for a specific site and its surroundings depends on local knowledge and visits that software cannot substitute for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing fitted furniture to meet customer requirements
staying human
The ratings behind this row put fitted furniture well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Design fitted furniture to meet customer requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Fitted furniture design can be drafted from measurements, but the room has to be measured and the customer consulted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with architects to develop detailed designs for construction projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles architects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 3120/01
Source: “Collaborate with architects to develop detailed designs for construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Design work can be drafted quickly, but developing a scheme with an architect happens through back-and-forth discussion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing innovative solutions to complex technical engineering problems using analytical techniques
staying human
The ratings behind this row put innovative solutions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Develop innovative solutions to complex technical engineering problems using analytical techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (31–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Genuinely novel engineering solutions come out of software as starting points only and need heavy expert development.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning, managing
staying human
The ratings behind this row put services engineering projects well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Plan, manage, and monitor building services engineering projects using quality and information management systems to meet specifications, budget, and targets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software handles the tracking and reporting, though managing a live engineering project means dealing with people and site realities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing product feasibility with technicians and manufacturers
staying human
The ratings behind this row put product feasibility well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Assess product feasibility with technicians and manufacturers, focusing on design and economic viability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Feasibility judgements rest on what a specific factory can actually make, which is local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Delivering work to the manufacturer's and customer's quality specifications
staying human
The ratings behind this row put work well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Deliver work to the manufacturer's and customer's quality specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Meeting quality specifications is partly documentation software supports and partly checking the actual work with the customer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working safely at all times by adhering to relevant legislation and regulations to ensure the safety of self
staying human
The ratings behind this row put all times well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Work safely at all times by adhering to relevant legislation and regulations to ensure the safety of self and others.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Working safely follows written regulations that are easy to check against, though the safe behaviour happens wherever the person is.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Liaising with architects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles architects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Liaise with architects, engineers and designers to understand their design requirements and provide technical advice to manufacturing and construction technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Technical notes are easy to produce, but liaising between designers and site or factory teams runs on working relationships.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Colouring drawings to emphasise details or eliminate background using airbrush and overlays
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: drawings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Colour drawings to emphasise details or eliminate background using airbrush and overlays.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Colouring and masking drawings is now mostly done on screen, though the traditional airbrush version is manual work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with stakeholders, clients and other construction roles, including programming and technical matters
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles stakeholders, clients and other construction roles and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Collaborate with stakeholders, clients and other construction roles, including programming and technical matters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with clients and other trades on programme and technical matters runs on people talking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying user needs and consider the local context when developing architectural projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles user needs and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Identify user needs and consider the local context when developing architectural projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding what users need and what the local area is like comes from talking to people and visiting the place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conferring with customer representatives to review schematics and answer questions pertaining to installation of systems
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles customer representatives and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Confer with customer representatives to review schematics and answer questions pertaining to installation of systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Answering a customer's installation questions depends on a live conversation and trust in the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Creating detailed final hand drawings and specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: detailed final hand drawings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Create detailed final hand drawings and specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Specifications are easy to draft, but final hand drawings have to be physically drawn by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Surveying locations accurately to produce designs for furniture installation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: locations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3120/02
Source: “Survey locations accurately to produce designs for furniture installation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The design can be drawn up by software, but the measurements have to be taken on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting information about Earth's features using aerial photography and remote sensing techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: information, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3120/03
Source: “Collect information about Earth's features using aerial photography and remote sensing techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Collecting features from the air needs aircraft, cameras and sensors, even though processing the images is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating a photogrammetric plotting instrument or a digital photogrammetric workstation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: a photogrammetric plotting instrument, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Operate a photogrammetric plotting instrument or a digital photogrammetric workstation (DPW), which views the photographs stereoscopically, or in a 3D format.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Operating a stereoscopic plotting instrument or workstation is trained hands-on work at specialist equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting the quality of work to ensure standards are met
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the quality of work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3120/03
Source: “Inspect the quality of work to ensure standards are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging whether work meets standard means looking at it where it was done.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting hydrographic surveys and other marine activities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hydrographic surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3120/03
Source: “Conduct hydrographic surveys and other marine activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Survey data can be processed automatically, but collecting it means being out on the water.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with health, safety & welfare requirements and applying safe systems of work
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Ensure compliance with health, safety & welfare requirements and apply safe systems of work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (8–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Making sure safe systems of work are actually followed means being where the work happens and taking responsibility for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting completed work to ensure conformance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: completed work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Inspect completed work to ensure conformance to specifications, standards, and contract requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking finished work against the contract means going and looking at it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Duplicating drawings and documents
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: drawings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3120/01
Source: “Duplicate drawings and documents using blueprinting, photography, or other methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Copying drawings by blueprinting or photography means feeding paper through equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing and maintaining strong collaborative relationships with customers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles strong collaborative relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 3120/02
Source: “Establish and maintain strong collaborative relationships with customers, suppliers, and stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Long-term working relationships with customers and suppliers are the whole point of this task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring accurate measurement and data collection using surveying discipline tools and technology
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accurate measurement, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Ensure accurate measurement and data collection using surveying discipline tools and technology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Accurate surveying means taking the instruments out and measuring the ground yourself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Utilising laser scanning technology to capture geospatial information accurately
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: laser scanning technology, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3120/03
Source: “Utilise laser scanning technology to capture geospatial information accurately.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Laser scanning requires taking the scanner to the site and setting it up properly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising field surveys and inspections for construction drawing revisions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3120/01
Source: “Supervise field surveys and inspections for construction drawing revisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Supervising field surveys means being outdoors with the team while the measurements are taken.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring builder compliance with design specifications on construction sites as a representative of architects or engineers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: builder compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3120/01
Source: “Ensure builder compliance with design specifications on construction sites as a representative of architects or engineers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking that builders are following the drawings means walking the site and seeing what has actually been built.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting site visits to assess project advancement
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site visits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Conduct site visits to assess project advancement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Assessing progress on a site means physically going there and looking at the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Visiting construction sites to gather measurements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3120/01
Source: “Visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking measurements on a construction site requires someone physically there with the equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting site visits and surveys
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site visits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3120/02
Source: “Conduct site visits and surveys when required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Visiting and surveying a site means physically being there and seeing the place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £35,200a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 54,900in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: identification numbers in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: assigning identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking and creating designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design. What it cannot do is be trusted in person, which is what CAD technicians run on: someone specific doing it and standing behind it. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

The exposed part of your job is the biggest part, and I am not going to dress that up: assigning identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking is work today's tools do quickly and cheaply, and that is not coming back.

So, given all that: 51% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 25% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 24% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 134 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

What you have that the software does not is supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks, plus the years of knowing when something looks wrong before you can say why. That is the raw material for everything below.

This week: one thing

Sit on the machine's side of the desk. Pick one real piece of identification numbers you would normally do yourself, let whatever software you already have take the first pass at it, and then go through what it produced and write down every single thing it got wrong. One evening this week. Do not fix anything yet. Just catch it.

What you end up holding: a written list of the machine’s mistakes, in your handwriting
How long it takes: an evening, or an hour if you pick one job rather than one client

If you can’t run software on your employer’s or your clients’ data: Do the same hunt on paper. Take one printed piece of identification numbers, work through it the way you always do, and mark every point where you made a call rather than followed a rule. Same evening, same list, nothing to log into and nobody to ask permission from. That list is the same artifact: it is the judgment written down.

Over the next 90 days

Change one sentence about what you do. Not on a CV. Out loud, to whoever pays you. From “my job is assigning identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking” to “I check what the software does and tell you what it means.” Your error list from this week is what makes that sentence true instead of a claim, so use it: show it once, to one person, inside the next ninety days. Same skills, priced as judgment rather than as typing.

Over the next 12 months

Walk toward the end of this job that answers for things, and get it recognised. Pick the one part of supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks you are already best at, and spend the year making it formal: a qualification, a named responsibility, a specialism people ask for by name. Price it honestly: that is evenings, it is months rather than weeks, and the seats are competitive because everyone in your position is looking at the same door. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to CAD, drawing and architectural technicians (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants: only about 10% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 51/49: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “collaborate with architects to develop detailed designs for construction projects”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Chartered architectural technologists, planning officers and consultants
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “ensure builder compliance with design specifications on construction sites as a representative of architects or engineers”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 10% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 10% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Architects
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “conduct site visits to assess project advancement”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 9% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 9% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Building and civil engineering technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “ensure compliance with health, safety & welfare requirements and apply safe systems of work”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 8% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 8% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 51% of its task weight, across 134 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
“It’s too late for me to become something else”
You are not starting from zero, and the page shows why: supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks is work the software cannot do and you already do it. The move above is a repricing of what you know, not a new career. Nobody who has just left college has that.
“I should learn to code”
Almost certainly not. The value in your job is moving toward checking, deciding and answering for the output, not toward writing the software. A weekend of Python will not change your position; the error list from this week will.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Architectural and Civil Drafters is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Architectural and Civil Drafters, Electrical and Electronics Drafters, Mechanical Drafters, Drafters, All Other and Fine Artists, Including Painters, Sculptors, and Illustrators. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for cad / drawing / architectural technicians, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 51% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for cad / drawing / architectural technicians. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for cad / drawing / architectural technicians launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for cad / drawing / architectural technicians yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for cad / drawing / architectural technicians existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for cad / drawing / architectural technicians launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace CAD, drawing and architectural technicians?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 134 official task statements scored for CAD, drawing and architectural technicians (United Kingdom, SOC 3120), 51% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 56 out of 100 (range 51–62, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “CAD, drawing and architectural technicians” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Assign identification numbers to architectural materials for tracking” (93/100, very high); “Record calculated figures on architectural materials lists for project documentation” (93/100, very high); “Calculate product costings from raw materials and manufacturing costs for profitability” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “CAD, drawing and architectural technicians” stay human?: About 24% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conduct site visits and surveys when required” (0/100, minimal); “Reproduce working drawings on photocopiers” (0/100, minimal); “Visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “CAD, drawing and architectural technicians” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 51% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 24% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for CAD, drawing and architectural technicians calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 134 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
34 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.