Will AI replace Chartered surveyors?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 116 official task statements scored for Chartered surveyors (United Kingdom, SOC 2454), 25% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 37 out of 100 (range 31–43, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Chartered surveyors” stay human?

About 54% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Adjust surveying instruments to maintain their accuracy” (0/100, minimal); “Participate in surveying to establish reference points, levels, or elevations for construction” (0/100, minimal); “Establish fixed points for use in making maps, using geodetic and engineering instruments” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Chartered surveyors” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 25% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 54% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Chartered surveyors calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 116 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Chartered surveyors

calculating heights, depths and relative positions of terrain, gathering data on the earth's physical and man-made features through surveys and surveying buildings to document property boundaries. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI is already taking a real slice of the routine work here: maintaining records of survey data. That is a slice of tasks, not of you.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 25%
changing shape: 20%
staying human: 54%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 37 out of 100 (31–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 116 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for chartered surveyors is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

That slice is not coming back; the core of the job, acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings, stays yours. The tools change, the responsibility doesn't.

Your week, as this page understands it

Chartered surveyors conduct surveys related to the measurement, management, valuation and development of land, natural resources, buildings, other types of property, and infrastructure such as harbours, roads and railway lines. The job title says “chartered surveyors”. The real job is the part underneath: acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But chartered surveyors is not one task. It is 116 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 25%
changing shape: 20%
staying human: 54%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

Shifting to AI

30 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Maintaining records of survey data
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of survey data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Maintain records of survey data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping survey data organised and retrievable is routine record-keeping that software handles reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating heights, depths and relative positions of terrain
This is reading one thing and writing another: heights, depths and relative positions of terrain in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Calculate heights, depths, and relative positions of terrain.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning measurements into heights, depths and positions is calculation, which software performs faster and more consistently than people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing information from inspections or visits
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/01, 2454/04
Source: “Analyse information from inspections or visits to buildings, land and construction sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once inspection notes exist, pulling out patterns and conclusions is desk work that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing sketches, maps and legal descriptions of surveys
This is reading one thing and writing another: sketches, maps and legal descriptions of surveys in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Prepare sketches, maps, and legal descriptions of surveys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing up sketches, maps and written descriptions from survey results is documented drafting work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

24 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Calculating retrace or adjusting existing surveys to match ground elevation-dependent grids, geodetic grids or property boundaries
The software now makes the first pass at retrace, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Calculate, retrace, or adjust existing surveys to match ground elevation-dependent grids, geodetic grids, or property boundaries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recalculating and adjusting surveys against grids and boundaries is mathematics that software handles accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining reports to describe, certify and assume liability for work carried out
The software now makes the first pass at reports, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Maintain reports to describe, certify, and assume liability for work carried out.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reports can be drafted easily, but certifying work and accepting liability is something only a chartered professional can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating findings with engineering and architectural personnel
The software now makes the first pass at findings, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Coordinate findings with engineering and architectural personnel, clients, and others involved in projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Bringing findings together with engineers, architects and clients depends on live discussion and shared understanding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

62 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings
This work happens in the physical world: an expert witness during legal proceedings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/01, 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Act as an expert witness during legal proceedings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Expert evidence must be given personally by a named individual who can be cross-examined and is answerable to the court.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Surveying properties, identify structural faults and recommending repairs
This work happens in the physical world: properties, identify structural faults and recommending repairs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/01, 2454/04
Source: “Survey properties, identify structural faults and recommend repairs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The survey itself needs someone on site; only the repair recommendations that follow can be drafted by software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Determining orientation of parcels of land
This work happens in the physical world: orientation of parcels of land, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Determine orientation of parcels of land including position, boundaries, size, and shape.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Working out boundaries and parcel shapes mixes deeds and records with field checks on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 106 tasks

Maintaining records of site visits
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of site visits in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Maintain records of site visits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping visit records tidy and complete is routine filing and formatting that software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating the fee to be charged to the client
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the fee in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2454/01
Source: “Calculate the fee to be charged to the client.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out the client's fee is arithmetic against a fee scale, which software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Processing specific types of data according to job requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specific types of data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2454/03
Source: “Process specific types of data according to job requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Processing data to set requirements is repetitive, rule-based work software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing computer models for hydrological predictions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Develop computer models for hydrological predictions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building hydrological prediction models is coding and mathematics, an area where software assistance is already very strong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating digital maps using geographic information system
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: digital maps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/03
Source: “Create digital maps using geographic information system (GIS) technology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Making digital maps in mapping software is well-documented work that automated tools already do very capably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using geographical information systems, GIS) for spatial data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geographical information systems, gis) in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/03
Source: “Use geographical information systems (GIS) for spatial data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spatial analysis in mapping software follows documented methods and is strongly supported by automated tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing data from aerial photography
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Analyse data from aerial photography, satellite surveys, and laser beam measuring systems to support geographical mapping.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting aerial, satellite and laser data is image and data analysis, an area where automated tools are strong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Compiling aerial photographs, survey notes, records and original maps for map preparation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: aerial photographs, survey notes, records and original maps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Compile aerial photographs, survey notes, records, and original maps for map preparation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering photographs, notes, records and old maps into a usable set for mapping is organising work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Searching legal records, survey records and land titles to obtain information about property boundaries in areas
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal records, survey records and land titles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Search legal records, survey records, and land titles to obtain information about property boundaries in areas to be surveyed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Title and boundary records are held digitally and searched to a set method, which suits automation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using GIS technology to analyse and interpret geographical site features
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: GIS technology in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Use GIS technology to analyse and interpret geographical site features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing site features with mapping software is documented, tool-supported work that automated systems handle strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing reports to inform construction managers and clients about project progress
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Write reports to inform construction managers and clients about project progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports follow a set structure and draw on data already collected, so drafts generate reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing, and applying findingsing from new research and developments in the field
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Review and apply findings from new research and developments in the field.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading new findings and judging what applies here mixes easy summarising with expert judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying research outcomes to identify environmental issues and adapt solutions to projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research outcomes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Apply research outcomes to identify environmental issues and adapt solutions to projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading research across into project decisions is desk analysis that software handles well from available documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting data using maps, charts and plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Interpret data using maps, charts and plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading maps, charts and plans to draw conclusions is interpretation software now does well from digital versions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing digital images and satellite photos for geographical data interpretation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: digital images in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2454/03
Source: “Analyse digital images and satellite photos for geographical data interpretation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting satellite and aerial imagery is a task automated image analysis is genuinely strong at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring, and complying withing current regulations and legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2454/01
Source: “Monitor and comply with current regulations and legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulations and legislation are published and searchable, so tracking them and flagging changes suits software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using computer-aided design, CAD) and Geographical Information Systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer-aided design, cad) and geographical information systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/03
Source: “Use computer-aided design (CAD) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to prepare and present maps and plans for data gathering of sites and study areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (66–74 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing and presenting maps and plans in design and mapping software is documented work with strong automated support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Outlining building control programmes for project completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: control programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Outline building control programmes for project completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out a building control programme is planning on paper, which software drafts well from standard project stages.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing reports on site visits
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Write reports on site visits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Site visit reports follow a familiar shape, so software drafts them well from notes, with the surveyor checking the judgements.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring accuracy and continuity of data used in engineering
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accuracy in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Ensure accuracy and continuity of data used in engineering, surveying, or construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking that project data is accurate and consistent is systematic comparison work that software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating detailed information for analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Generate detailed information for analysis by planners, builders, and cartographers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing detailed information for planners, builders and cartographers is data preparation and writing that software does capably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting a comprehensive analysis of information before distributing it to relevant professionals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a comprehensive analysis of information before distributing it in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2454/03
Source: “Conduct a comprehensive analysis of information before distributing it to relevant professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Thoroughly analysing information before passing it on is desk work software drafts well, with the surveyor confirming conclusions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing procedures for construction projects to ensure accurate property assessments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/04
Source: “Develop procedures for construction projects to ensure accurate property assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing procedures for accurate property assessment is documented process design that software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on reducing environmental impact through sustainable construction practices
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reducing environmental impact in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2454/01
Source: “Advise on reducing environmental impact through sustainable construction practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sustainable building methods are widely written up, so drafting solid advice is straightforward; the engineer tailors it to the actual scheme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating specialised technical software and GIS for data integration
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specialised technical software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2454/02
Source: “Operate specialised technical software and GIS for data integration, processing, and presentation to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running mapping and technical software to process and present data is the kind of work automated tools already do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding to technical queries from onshore engineering teams
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical queries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Respond to technical queries from onshore engineering teams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering engineering teams' technical questions is written work that software drafts well from project data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing building plans for compliance with safety regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2454/01
Source: “Review building plans for compliance with safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Plan checking against published rules is desk work software does well, but approval is a qualified inspector's formal decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending ways to repair identified faults
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at ways, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Recommend ways to repair identified faults.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting a fix once the fault is known draws on well-documented knowledge, though seeing the kit often helps.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on party wall procedures and regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at party wall procedures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Advise on party wall procedures and regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Party wall rules are published and well settled, so software can explain the procedure clearly for a surveyor to confirm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing navigational charts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at navigational charts, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2454/02
Source: “Provide navigational charts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Charts are built from survey data, but navigation safety means a qualified hydrographer must stand behind what is published.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sourcing information on seabed type
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2454/02
Source: “Source information on seabed type, water movements and waves.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding existing information on seabed, currents and waves is research and retrieval, which software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering information for bridge construction
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Deliver information for bridge construction, and oil, gas, and mineral resource exploration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning survey results into information engineers can use is written work, though a professional signs off its reliability.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering information for marine wind farm development and oceanographic research
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Offer information for marine wind farm development and oceanographic research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Packaging survey findings for wind farm and research users is desk work, with a professional confirming the numbers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing reliable information for coastal works and seabed telephone cables
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at reliable information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Provide reliable information for coastal works and seabed telephone cables.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing dependable information for coastal works and cable routes is desk work built on survey data, checked by a professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supplying information for environmental monitoring and aquaculture
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Supply information for environmental monitoring and aquaculture.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Supplying environmental and aquaculture information is compiling and presenting data, with a professional confirming it is sound.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying geodetic points, elevations and planimetric or topographic features
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at geodetic points, elevations and planimetric or topographic features, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2454/03
Source: “Identify geodetic points, elevations, and planimetric or topographic features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Picking out control points, levels and mapped features from survey data is pattern recognition software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering technical questions from hydrologists
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical questions, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Answer technical questions from hydrologists, policymakers, or other customers developing water conservation plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Answering technical questions on water conservation draws on documented science, so software can draft strong replies for a specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining and specifying details of survey projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at details of survey projects, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Determine and specify details of survey projects, including sources of information, procedures to be used, and the design of survey instruments and materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Specifying survey methods, sources and instruments is planning work software can draft, though experience shapes the final choices.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on additional steps for conditional approval
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at additional steps, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Advise on additional steps for conditional approval.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Setting out what else is needed for approval is written advice, though a responsible surveyor must stand behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice based on the outcomes of surveys and inspections
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2454/04
Source: “Provide advice based on the outcomes of surveys and inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Advice following a survey is written work software drafts well, though a chartered surveyor must stand behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing demolition permits
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at demolition permits, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2454/01
Source: “Issue demolition permits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Producing the permit document is routine, but issuing it is a formal act by an accountable officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and advising clients on requirements for their schemes and projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Assess and advise clients on requirements for their schemes and projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working out what a client's scheme requires is largely desk analysis, but the client relationship shapes how advice lands.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing strategic advice and recommendations based on geospatial data analysis
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at strategic advice, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Provide strategic advice and recommendations based on geospatial data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Strategic recommendations from mapping data are written work software drafts well, though clients weigh who is giving the advice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing scientific experiments and collating findings to improve hydrographic mapping techniques
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific experiments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2454/02
Source: “Design scientific experiments and collate findings to improve hydrographic mapping techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing experiments and pulling findings together is thinking and writing work software can draft, with expert review of the method.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying the impact of environmental conditions like pollution on aquatic life
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the impact of environmental conditions like pollution, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Study the impact of environmental conditions like pollution on aquatic life.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Studying pollution effects on aquatic life combines published science with fieldwork, so software can do much of the analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making recommendations on necessary changes for compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at recommendations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Make recommendations on necessary changes for compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once the facts are gathered, matching them to published standards and listing required changes is straightforward desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Guiding team members in preparing land and property survey proposals
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at team members, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Guide team members in preparing land and property survey proposals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guiding colleagues through proposal writing depends on live coaching as well as the document itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting feasibility studies to ensure regulatory compliance and safety
staying human
The ratings behind this row put feasibility studies well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2454/01
Source: “Conduct feasibility studies to ensure regulatory compliance and safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Feasibility studies follow documented rules, so software can draft most of one, but site facts and professional judgement still shape the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing approval for conditional processes in building control
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for approval, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Issue approval for conditional processes in building control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The paperwork is templated, but issuing a building control approval is a decision a responsible person must take.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with statutory bodies for construction project compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles statutory bodies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2454/01
Source: “Liaise with statutory bodies for construction project compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Correspondence with statutory bodies drafts easily, though the relationships and negotiations run through named people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Problemsolving for colleagues working offshore when based onshore
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues working offshore and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Problem-solve for colleagues working offshore when based onshore.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Solving problems for offshore colleagues from an onshore desk is diagnostic thinking, though it leans on hard-won field experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Advising on health and safety issues in relation to new buildings and developments
staying human
The ratings behind this row put health well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2454/01
Source: “Advise on health and safety issues in relation to new buildings and developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Safety advice for new buildings draws on published regulations, so software can draft it, though a surveyor confirms it fits the scheme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring products meet design limitations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for products meet design limitations, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2454/01
Source: “Ensure products meet design limitations, such as fire resistance or acoustics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Fire and acoustic performance is checked against published data, but responsibility for the judgement sits with a qualified professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with others, construction managers, planners and designing teams
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles others, construction managers, planners and designing teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2454/01, 2454/04
Source: “Liaise with others including construction managers, planners and design teams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating with construction managers, planners and designers runs on live conversation and negotiation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice to a variety of clients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for advice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 50 · 2454/03
Source: “Provide advice to a variety of clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients pay for advice that a chartered surveyor personally stands behind, even when the analysis is automated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising clients on issues, property boundary disputes
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for clients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2454/04
Source: “Advise clients on issues such as property boundary disputes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Boundary dispute advice needs a chartered surveyor's standing, though the underlying research and drafting can be assisted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using gathered information to advise clients effectively
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for gathered information, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2454/04
Source: “Use gathered information to advise clients effectively.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients act on advice that a chartered surveyor puts their name and professional responsibility behind.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing data to map the land for civil engineering and construction projects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Collect and analyse data to map the land for civil engineering and construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Mapping data is analysed easily once collected, but collecting it means being out on the land.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out environmental impact assessments
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for environmental impact assessments, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Carry out environmental impact assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Environmental statements must be produced by recognised competent experts, and the decisive site evidence is gathered in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating contracts with customers and suppliers for property valuations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contracts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2454/04
Source: “Negotiate contracts with customers and suppliers for property valuations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract negotiation turns on live give and take with the other party and the trust behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Communicating with councillors on construction-related issues to ensure project compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles councillors and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Communicate with councillors on construction-related issues to ensure project compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Briefings can be drafted, though dealing with councillors is a conversation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing and monitoring projects from start to finish - you're more likely to do this once you're
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles projects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2454/03
Source: “Manage and monitor projects from start to finish - you're more likely to do this once you're chartered.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a project end to end means chasing people, visiting sites and holding client confidence throughout.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Receiving and implementing project instructions from clients to ensure accurate cost and property assessments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project instructions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2454/04
Source: “Receive and implement project instructions from clients to ensure accurate cost and property assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking client instructions and turning them into an assessment plan mixes live discussion with straightforward written follow-up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and analysing common building defects using survey information and appropriate testing methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: common building defects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Identify and analyse common building defects using survey information and appropriate testing methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Analysing defects from existing survey information is desk work, though some testing still needs hands on the building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with the public regarding construction projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the public regarding construction projects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Communicate with the public regarding construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Notices and newsletters can be drafted automatically, but answering worried neighbours in person is what the task really involves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Confirming properties adhere to accessibility standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: properties adhere, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Confirm properties adhere to accessibility standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Accessibility checks mix reading standards with measuring real doorways and ramps, so roughly half the work needs someone present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring work aligns with project plans
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work aligns, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Ensure work aligns with project plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Comparing built work against plans needs eyes on site as well as document checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing criteria for the design and modification of survey instruments
staying human
The ratings behind this row put criteria well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2454/03
Source: “Develop criteria for the design and modification of survey instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Setting design criteria for survey instruments is specialist engineering judgement built on hands-on experience with the kit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with colleagues across the field
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: colleagues across the field, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Liaise with colleagues across the field including fellow research staff, technicians, ship's crews and research assistants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating with crews, technicians and researchers happens largely face to face, often offshore.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with technical specialists on specific projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technical specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Collaborate with technical specialists on specific projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working alongside other specialists depends on live discussion; software can support it with notes and analysis but not replace it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Approving demolitions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for demolitions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Approve demolitions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Approving a demolition is a formal decision a responsible officer must make and sign for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising staff engaged in surveying and plotting data
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Supervise staff engaged in surveying and plotting data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising surveying staff means checking their work and being available to them, partly on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting the construction of water ports
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the construction of water ports, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Support the construction of water ports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (0–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Supporting port construction means survey work at the water's edge as well as desk analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising and instructing assistants to support professional tasks
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: assistants, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Supervise and instruct assistants to support professional tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising and instructing assistants happens alongside them as the work is done.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Gathering data on the earth's physical and man-made features through surveys
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/03
Source: “Gather data on the earth's physical and man-made features through surveys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Collecting data about land features means going out and surveying it in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out aerial surveys of land use and features
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: aerial surveys of land, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Carry out aerial surveys of land use and features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Aerial surveys need aircraft or drones flown over the land, which is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Survey land and buildings to analyse their current
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: land, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/03
Source: “Survey land and buildings to analyse their current use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Assessing current land and building use starts with visiting and observing what is actually there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: project sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Inspect project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Monitoring progress and conditions on a construction site requires walking it and looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out site surveys to map land features
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/03
Source: “Carry out site surveys to map land features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Mapping land features starts with someone standing on the site taking measurements.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Surveying land to measure distances
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: land, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Survey land to measure distances, angles, and elevations for construction or mapping purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Measuring distances, angles and levels means being on the land with instruments.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Surveying buildings to document property boundaries
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: buildings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/03
Source: “Survey buildings to document property boundaries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Documenting boundaries means measuring the actual building and its edges on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Checking that work is following building regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work is following building regulations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2454/01
Source: “Check that work is following building regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking building work against the rules means being on site, and it is a qualified person's formal responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting regular inspections to ensure compliance with standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: regular inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2454/01
Source: “Conduct regular inspections to ensure compliance with standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Compliance inspections mean attending the property, and the inspection itself is what the regulator expects a qualified surveyor to do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting buildings for compliance with public health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: buildings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2454/01
Source: “Inspect buildings for compliance with public health, fire safety, energy conservation, sustainability, and accessibility regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging compliance means walking the building and seeing conditions first-hand, so software can only help prepare and check the paperwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating and assessing damage to property to ensure compliance with building regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: damage, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Investigate and assess damage to property to ensure compliance with building regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Damage assessment starts with seeing the property, so software can only help write up what a surveyor found.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using sonars and echo sounders to collect underwater topography data
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sonars, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/02
Source: “Use sonars and echo sounders to collect underwater topography data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running sonar and echo sounders means being aboard operating the kit, though the resulting data is processed on screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Using geodetic survey equipment, theodolites and satellite-based positioning for land assessment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: geodetic survey equipment, theodolites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Use geodetic survey equipment such as theodolites and satellite-based positioning for land assessment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Theodolites and satellite positioning have to be set up and operated on site by a surveyor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting and evaluating samples of new building materials for suitability
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of new building materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Collect and evaluate samples of new building materials for suitability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Samples have to be physically collected before anything can be evaluated, which needs a person on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying faults in structures to ensure safety and compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: faults, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/01
Source: “Identify faults in structures to ensure safety and compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting faults means being at the structure, tapping, looking and probing, which software cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting buildings for structural integrity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: buildings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/01
Source: “Inspect buildings for structural integrity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Structural inspection depends on being in the building and using trained eyes and hands on the fabric.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting wiring, plumbing, electrical circuits, sewers, heating systems and foundations for safety and coding compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrical circuits, sewers, heating systems and foundations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/01
Source: “Inspect wiring, plumbing, electrical circuits, sewers, heating systems, and foundations for safety and code compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking wiring, drains and foundations means getting into lofts, ducts and crawl spaces in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Prosecuting builders if non-compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: builders if non-compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2454/01
Source: “Prosecute builders if non-compliance has occurred, as a last resort.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Prosecution is a legal step run by qualified people in a courtroom, not something software can carry out.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Surveying buildings to assess structural integrity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: buildings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/04
Source: “Survey buildings to assess structural integrity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging structural integrity means being in the building, looking at cracks and movement in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Checking customers' premises and the construction of drains
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: customers' premises, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2454/01
Source: “Check customers' premises and the construction of drains.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking premises and drain construction means being there and looking at the actual pipework.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Surveying unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2454/01
Source: “Survey unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging an unsafe building means standing in front of it, and approving demolition is a formal decision for an authorised person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training assistants and helpers in conducting surveys
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: assistants, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Train assistants and helpers in conducting surveys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training people to survey means demonstrating with instruments in the field alongside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting sea-based sampling and experimentation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sea-based, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/02
Source: “Conduct sea-based sampling and experimentation, involving periods on sea-going vessels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: This work happens aboard a vessel at sea, so it needs a person physically there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Collecting samples using coring techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/02
Source: “Collect samples using coring techniques, water collection, and physical organism collection.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking cores, water and organism samples is hands-on collection that has to be done in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Gathering water samples for environmental analysis
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: water samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Gather water samples for environmental analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Water samples must be physically taken from the water by someone standing there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing and installing equipment for hydrological study
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2454/02
Source: “Prepare and install equipment for hydrological study including water level recorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Instruments like water level recorders have to be carried out and physically installed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating underwater recovery units to retrieve objects or samples from aquatic environments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: underwater recovery units, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2454/02
Source: “Operate underwater recovery units to retrieve objects or samples from aquatic environments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Recovering objects underwater is done with equipment operated at the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Managing offshore projects as a ship-based manager
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: offshore projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Manage offshore projects as a ship-based manager.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Managing a project from aboard ship requires being on the vessel with the team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning navigational aids
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: navigational aids, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2454/02
Source: “Position navigational aids.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Navigational aids are physical objects that must be placed in the water by people and boats.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Establishing fixed points for use in making maps
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fixed points, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Establish fixed points for use in making maps, using geodetic and engineering instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence, and it moved between repeat runs, so the range is widened.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Fixed survey points are physical markers that have to be set and observed in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in surveying to establish reference points
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surveying, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Participate in surveying to establish reference points, levels, or elevations for construction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting out points and levels on site is done by hand with instruments on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting surveying instruments to maintain their accuracy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: instruments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2454/03, 2454/04
Source: “Adjust surveying instruments to maintain their accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Calibrating a survey instrument is done with hands on the instrument.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £46,200a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 67,300in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: records of survey data in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: maintaining records of survey data and calculating heights, depths and relative positions of terrain. What it cannot do is be answerable: an expert witness during legal proceedings need a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Maintaining records of survey data is going; acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings is not.

So, given all that: 25% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 20% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 54% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 116 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles acting as an expert witness during legal proceedings, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to chartered surveyors (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was quantity surveyors: only about 8% of its durable work is work you already do. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 37/100 here, with only 25% of the task list in the top band, and “survey properties, identify structural faults and recommend repairs” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Quantity surveyors
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “advise clients on issues such as property boundary disputes”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 8% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 8% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Building and civil engineering technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “adjust surveying instruments to maintain their accuracy”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £37,229 against your £46,184, 19.4% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
CAD, drawing and architectural technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already analyse information from inspections or visits to buildings, land and construction sites, and their equivalent is to visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary. Across both published task lists that is about 4% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £35,221 against your £46,184, 23.7% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 25% of its task weight, across 116 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Cartographers and Photogrammetrists is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Surveyors

In US official statistics this job is counted as Cartographers and Photogrammetrists and Surveyors. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for chartered surveyors, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 25% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for chartered surveyors. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for chartered surveyors launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for chartered surveyors yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for chartered surveyors existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for chartered surveyors launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Chartered surveyors?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 116 official task statements scored for Chartered surveyors (United Kingdom, SOC 2454), 25% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 37 out of 100 (range 31–43, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Chartered surveyors” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain records of site visits” (93/100, very high); “Calculate the fee to be charged to the client” (93/100, very high); “Calculate heights, depths, and relative positions of terrain” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Chartered surveyors” stay human?: About 54% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Adjust surveying instruments to maintain their accuracy” (0/100, minimal); “Participate in surveying to establish reference points, levels, or elevations for construction” (0/100, minimal); “Establish fixed points for use in making maps, using geodetic and engineering instruments” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Chartered surveyors” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 25% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 54% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Chartered surveyors calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 116 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
16 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.