Will AI replace Environment professionals?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 238 official task statements scored for Environment professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2152), 39% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 47 out of 100 (range 41–53, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Environment professionals” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Analyse metered data to track energy consumption and identify trends” (93/100, very high); “Generate a range of media content, such as social media posts, blogs, flyers, newsletters, and briefs, to disseminate information and raise awareness” (93/100, very high); “Promote activities through adverts, leaflets or social media” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Environment professionals” stay human?

About 42% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Lead guided walks to interpret the natural environment for groups” (0/100, minimal); “Weigh or measure collected sample particles to determine concentration of pollutants” (0/100, minimal); “Decontaminate field equipment used to clean pollutants from soil, air, or water” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Environment professionals” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 39% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 42% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Environment professionals calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 238 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Environment professionals

analysing metered data to track energy consumption and identify trends, ensuring compliance with environmental legislation and planning goals and targets to advance environmental research and conservation efforts. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: managing databases of environmental data for accessibility is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 39%
changing shape: 20%
staying human: 42%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 47 out of 100 (41–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 238 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for environment professionals is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. That is more in your control than it sounds.

Your week, as this page understands it

Environment professionals investigate, address, and advise on a variety of terrestrial and marine environment and resource management issues, including the development and implementation of environmental policies and remedies that address the impacts of human activities and industrial processes on the environment. The job title says “environment professionals”. The real job is the part underneath: conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But environment professionals is not one task. It is 238 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 39%
changing shape: 20%
staying human: 42%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

45 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

91 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Interpreting, and applying regulatorying and policy requirements to ensure proposed projects comply with environmental standards
This is reading one thing and writing another: policy requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Interpret and apply regulatory and policy requirements to ensure proposed projects comply with environmental standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading regulations across to a project is document work software handles well, with a professional confirming it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining documentation to ensure environmental compliance
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Maintain documentation to ensure environmental compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping compliance paperwork complete and current is structured record work software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing existing environmental remediation designs
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental remediation designs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Review existing environmental remediation designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing an existing design against documented standards is desk work software does well, with an engineer confirming.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and interpreting licence and registration requirements
This is reading one thing and writing another: licence in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Assess and interpret licence and registration requirements, including environmental permits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Permit and licence requirements are published, so software can read them across to a case for checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

45 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Developing site-specific health and safety protocols
The software now makes the first pass at site-specific health, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Develop site-specific health and safety protocols such as spill contingency plans or methods for loading and transporting raw materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spill plans and handling methods follow published templates that software adapts well to a described site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the environmental impacts of engineering
The software now makes the first pass at the environmental impacts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Assess the environmental impacts of engineering, architecture, or research and development activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (45–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessments follow documented methods and standard datasets, so software can produce a solid draft from desk research.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with environmental legislation
The software now makes the first pass at compliance, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/04, 2152/05
Source: “Ensure compliance with environmental legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking work against environmental law is document comparison software does well, with occasional site checks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

102 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations
This work happens in the physical world: site audits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/02, 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Conduct site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checklists and reports can be automated, but auditing a site means walking it and seeing what is happening.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing environmental protection projects to ensure compliance and effectiveness
The ratings behind this row put environmental protection projects well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 90 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Manage environmental protection projects to ensure compliance and effectiveness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project management is partly documented process, but keeping a protection project on track needs someone leading it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting environmental surveys to assess ecological impact and compliance with regulations
This work happens in the physical world: environmental surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Conduct environmental surveys to assess ecological impact and compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Ecological surveys mean walking the site and recording what is actually there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 228 tasks

Analysing metered data to track energy consumption and identify trends
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: metered data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 95 · 2152/01
Source: “Analyse metered data to track energy consumption and identify trends.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Half-hourly meter data is structured and abundant, so trend analysis runs almost entirely in software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating a range of media content
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a range of media content in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Generate a range of media content, such as social media posts, blogs, flyers, newsletters, and briefs, to disseminate information and raise awareness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing posts, blogs, flyers and newsletters is one of the things current software does best.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting activities through adverts, leaflets or social media
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Promote activities through adverts, leaflets or social media.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Adverts, leaflets and social posts are straightforward writing and design work software already produces well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing databases of environmental data for accessibility
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases of environmental data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Manage databases of environmental data for accessibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Organising and maintaining a data catalogue is exactly the sort of structured work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing project documentation for administrative support
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/04
Source: “Provide project documentation for administrative support.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up project documentation from existing material is straightforward document production.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/04
Source: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports are written from information already recorded, which software does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting CSR initiatives and updating colleagues on best practices through regular communications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: CSR initiatives in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Promote CSR initiatives and update colleagues on best practices through regular communications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Internal updates and awareness messages are straightforward writing tasks software handles very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining plans or documents for sustainability projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Maintain plans or documents for sustainability projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping project plans and documents current is structured paperwork software maintains reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating sustainability presentations for diverse audiences
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: sustainability presentations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Create sustainability presentations for diverse audiences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building presentations for different audiences is one of the things current software does best.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating marketing media like brochures to communicate sustainability issues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: media like brochures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Create marketing media like brochures to communicate sustainability issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Brochures and marketing material are exactly the kind of writing and design software produces well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Publicising programmes through sources, such as newsletters, bulletins or mailings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Publicise programmes through sources, such as newsletters, bulletins, or mailings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing newsletters, bulletins and mailings to publicise a programme is content production AI does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing recommendations for enhancing energy performance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Produce recommendations for enhancing energy performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommendations built from survey data and published measures are written output software produces well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing the impact of global climate patterns on regional weather conditions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the impact of global climate patterns in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Analyse the impact of global climate patterns on regional weather conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Linking global climate patterns to regional weather uses published datasets and methods that software analyses well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating computer models to simulate the effects of climate change
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Create computer models to simulate the effects of climate change.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Climate simulation is computer modelling on published methods and datasets, which software is strong at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Publishing scientific papers detailing research findings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scientific papers detailing research findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2152/02
Source: “Publish scientific papers detailing research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting a paper from results and literature is writing work software already does to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting correlations between human activities and environmental effects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: correlations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Interpret correlations between human activities and environmental effects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Linking human activity to environmental effects uses large published datasets that software analyses well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing data to determine its validity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Analyse data to determine its validity, quality, and scientific significance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging data quality and significance uses well-documented statistical methods that software applies reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Determining data collection methods for research projects or surveys
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data collection methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Determine data collection methods for research projects or surveys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing a data collection method follows well-published research practice, which software advises on confidently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Formulating recommendations based on research findings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Formulate recommendations based on research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning findings into written recommendations is analysis and writing, which software does to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing test data using computer modelling software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: test data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/03
Source: “Analyse test data using computer modelling software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running models over test data and writing up the output is computational work software performs very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Planning research models using mathematical concepts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Plan research models using mathematical concepts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up research models on mathematical foundations is well-documented work software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching government legislation affecting the company
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: government legislation affecting the company in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/03
Source: “Research government legislation affecting the company.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legislation is published and searchable, so software can research what affects the company.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching and collating scientific data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scientific data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Research and collate scientific data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Searching the literature and pulling findings together is one of the things software is fastest at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching regulatory, technical and marketing issues related to sustainability
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory, technical and marketing issues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Research regulatory, technical, and market issues related to sustainability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching rules, technology and markets across published sources is one of software's strongest uses.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Keeping up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: to date in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Keep up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legislation and research are published openly, so scanning and summarising them is something software does tirelessly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Benchmarking energy consumptions against best practice guidelines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: energy consumptions against best practice guidelines in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Benchmark energy consumptions against best practice guidelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing meter readings against published benchmark figures is a calculation computers do faster and more consistently than people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating potential energy savings for specific systems or projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: potential energy savings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Calculate potential energy savings for specific systems or projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Savings calculations follow published formulas and system data, which is exactly what software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting basic financial calculations to assess energy costs and potential savings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: basic financial calculations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Conduct basic financial calculations to assess energy costs and potential savings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost and payback sums are standard spreadsheet work that software completes accurately every time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing energy-related project reports and documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: energy-related project reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Prepare energy-related project reports and documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up project reports from existing data and templates is one of the strongest things current software does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying income eligibility of participants in publicly financed weatherproofing programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: income eligibility of participants in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Verify income eligibility of participants in publicly financed weatherproofing programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking income evidence against published eligibility rules is document-matching work computers do quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating environmental investigation or recommendation reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental investigation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Update environmental investigation or recommendation reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Refreshing an existing report with current data is one of the most routine writing tasks software performs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of decisions, actions and progress related to environmental redevelopment projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of decisions, actions and progress in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Maintain records of decisions, actions, and progress related to environmental redevelopment projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping a record of decisions and progress is structured documentation work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports on brownfield redevelopment needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Prepare reports on brownfield redevelopment needs, status, or progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress and status reports are written from existing project data, which software drafts quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing environmental data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Analyse environmental data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing environmental datasets is structured computational work software already performs quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing charts, graphs or sketches for environmental assessment reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: charts, graphs or sketches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Prepare charts, graphs, or sketches for environmental assessment reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning data into charts and figures for a report is routine work software does quickly and neatly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting findings from environmental data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Report findings from environmental data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up what the data shows is one of the most reliable things current software produces.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating or rewriting environmental reports to reflect current data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/04
Source: “Update or rewrite environmental reports to reflect current data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Updating an existing report with current figures is routine writing work software completes reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Distributing reports on financial or environmental impacts to stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Distribute reports on financial or environmental impacts to stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing and sending impact reports to stakeholders is structured document work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding to requests for information on educational issues from teachers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: requests in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Respond to requests for information on educational issues from teachers, educationalists, and colleagues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering information requests from documented material is a routine writing task software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing strategies to reduce energy consumption
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: strategies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 95 · 2152/01
Source: “Develop strategies to reduce energy consumption.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Energy reduction strategies are written from consumption data and well documented measures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/01
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records accurate is routine screen work software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Utilising community energy specific computer software to assist in financial modelling and accounting of projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: community energy specific computer software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/01
Source: “Utilise community energy specific computer software to assist in financial modelling and accounting of projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Financial modelling in a documented software package is well within what current tools do from structured inputs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs for environmental cleanup and remediation of land redevelopment projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Estimate costs for environmental cleanup and remediation of land redevelopment projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost estimates are built from published rates and site data, which software can assemble and calculate.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting network analysis in environmental engineering projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: network analysis in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Support network analysis in environmental engineering projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Network analysis is computational work on structured data, which software is well suited to.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing data from remote sensors on satellites and aeroplanes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Collect and analyse data from remote sensors on satellites and aeroplanes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Satellite and airborne sensor data arrives digitally, and processing it is exactly what analytical software does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing plans for management of renewable resources
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Prepare plans for management of renewable resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Resource management plans follow published frameworks and available data, so software can produce a strong draft.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying research outcomes to identify environmental issues and adapt solutions to projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research outcomes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Apply research outcomes to identify environmental issues and adapt solutions to projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading research across into project decisions is desk analysis that software handles well from available documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring progress of environmental improvement programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: progress of environmental improvement programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/04
Source: “Monitor progress of environmental improvement programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking programme progress against targets uses recorded data, which software monitors and reports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modeling biological treatment processes to remove or degrade pollutants
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: biological treatment processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/04
Source: “Model biological treatment processes to remove or degrade pollutants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling how treatment processes break down pollutants is computational work software performs well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining plans, permits or standard operating procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans, permits or standard operating procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/04
Source: “Obtain plans, permits, or standard operating procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking down plans, permits and procedures is document retrieval that software does quickly once given access.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting environmental research to support conservation and sustainability efforts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Conduct environmental research to support conservation and sustainability efforts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Conservation research over published literature and datasets is well handled by current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing plans to meet sustainability targets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Develop plans to meet sustainability targets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sustainability plans against known targets are structured writing that software produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting organisational sustainability targets to promote environmental responsibility
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: organisational sustainability targets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Set organisational sustainability targets to promote environmental responsibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting sustainability targets draws on published frameworks AI can apply to the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing environmental data to assess the sustainability performance of the business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Manage environmental data to assess the sustainability performance of the business.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing performance from environmental data is analysis on structured records, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing reports for organisations or funding bodies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Write reports for organisations or funding bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reports for funders follow a set structure and are drafted well from the project's own information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading environment-related desk-based research and evaluating results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environment-related desk-based research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/03
Source: “Lead environment-related desk-based research and evaluate results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Desk-based research over published sources is one of the strongest uses of current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing advice on mitigating climate change effects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: advice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Provide advice on mitigating climate change effects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Climate mitigation advice draws on a huge published evidence base, so software can produce strong material for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing permit applications for environmental compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: permit applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Prepare permit applications for environmental compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Permit applications are standard forms with supporting evidence, which software can draft accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and mitigating internal organisational risks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: internal organisational risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Assess and mitigate internal organisational risks, external environmental risks, and the impacts of climate change.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk assessment against climate and regulatory sources is structured desk analysis that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and submitting permit applications for remediation projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: permit applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Prepare and submit permit applications for remediation projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Permit applications follow published forms and guidance, so software can produce strong drafts for a consultant to check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and submitting permit applications for construction projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: permit applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Prepare and submit permit applications for construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Permit applications are structured forms with supporting documents, which software can assemble and draft accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing up findings, costings and health and safety plans for environmental issue resolution
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings, costings and health and safety plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Write up findings, costings, and health and safety plans for environmental issue resolution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up findings, costings and safety plans from existing data is well within what software drafts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing safe and sustainable environmental solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: safe in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03
Source: “Design safe and sustainable environmental solutions using analysis, modelling, and digital techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design work using modelling and digital tools is well supported by software, with an engineer signing off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing conceptual models involving identification and consideration of potential contamination
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: conceptual models involving identification in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03
Source: “Develop conceptual models involving identification and consideration of potential contamination.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Conceptual contamination models follow a documented structure that software builds well from site information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching and drafting legal documents for environmental compliance and consultancy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Research and draft legal documents for environmental compliance and consultancy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching and drafting compliance documents is document work software already produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing environmental reports and designations to assess the impact of planning applications and development proposals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03
Source: “Review environmental reports and designations to assess the impact of planning applications and development proposals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading reports and planning designations against published policy is document work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the effectiveness of data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the effectiveness of data analysis in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Assess the effectiveness of data analysis, research, and field measurements to ensure the validity and quality of environmental solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking whether analysis and measurements hold up is documented review work software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating technical content for administrative orders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical content in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Create technical content for administrative orders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical content for administrative orders follows set formats that software drafts well for legal checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching previous investigations of a site to provide information to clients considering purchase
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: previous investigations of a site in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Research previous investigations of a site to provide information to clients considering purchase.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Desk studies of a site's history search existing records, which software does thoroughly and fast.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in planning multimedia inspections at complex facilities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: planning multimedia inspections in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/04
Source: “Assist in planning multimedia inspections at complex facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning an inspection follows documented procedures and site records, which software assembles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing sustainability evaluation systems for environmental impact assessment
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: sustainability evaluation systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Develop sustainability evaluation systems for environmental impact assessment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Evaluation frameworks follow published methods that software can build and document to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing sustainability programme objectives to ensure compliance with policies and regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: sustainability programme objectives in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Review sustainability programme objectives to ensure compliance with policies and regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking objectives against policies and regulations is document comparison work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing research proposals for submission to external bodies
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on research proposals, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Write research proposals for submission to external bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software drafts proposals quickly, but tailoring one to a specific funder still takes substantial rewriting by the researcher.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Communicating energy performance data and progress of improvements to stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: energy performance data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Communicate energy performance data and progress of improvements to stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning energy data into clear updates is well-suited to software, though someone still fronts the conversation with stakeholders.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying appropriate community funding approaches and overseeing project funding processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: appropriate community funding approaches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/01
Source: “Identify appropriate community funding approaches and oversee project funding processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding and tracking funding routes is document research and form-filling, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sharing these findings with colleagues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: these findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/03
Source: “Share these findings with colleagues, clients, sub-contractors, and regulators.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Packaging findings for different audiences is writing work software does well, though a person fronts the discussion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on developing policies for environmental management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: developing policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Advise on developing policies for environmental management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Policy drafting draws on widely published frameworks, so software can produce solid material for people to refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consolidating feedback to understand and act on different perspectives
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: feedback in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/03
Source: “Consolidate feedback to understand and act on different perspectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling many strands of feedback into a clear picture is text analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging and interpreting feedback from statutory consultees and colleagues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: feedback in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/03
Source: “Engage and interpret feedback from statutory consultees and colleagues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Consultee responses are written documents, and summarising what they mean is well within software's reach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining ongoing administrative projects to ensure compliance and progress
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: administrative projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/04
Source: “Maintain ongoing administrative projects to ensure compliance and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking administrative projects and chasing progress is routine coordination work done through systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing a corporate social responsibility strategy to enhance sustainability and ethical practices within the company
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a corporate social responsibility strategy in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Develop a corporate social responsibility strategy to enhance sustainability and ethical practices within the company.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Responsibility strategies follow widely published frameworks, so software drafts strong material for leaders to shape.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying social and environmental risks to the business and escalate to stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: social in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Identify social and environmental risks to the business and escalate to stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting and writing up risks draws on documented sources, though someone raises them with the people who matter.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing associated costs and revenues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: associated costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Manage associated costs and revenues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost and revenue management is spreadsheet work that software handles reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching and developing educational programmes and resources
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: educational programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Research and develop educational programmes and resources for schools, adults, families, community groups or visitors to sites of special environmental interest.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Educational resources follow well-published formats, so software produces strong drafts for an educator to finish.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drafting and advising on environmental education policies and strategies at a senior level
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental education policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Draft and advise on environmental education policies and strategies at a senior level.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Senior policy drafting draws on published strategy material that software turns into usable text for leaders.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring ice, sea levels and temperatures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: ice, sea levels and temperatures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Monitor ice, sea levels and temperatures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ice, sea level and temperature records come from instruments and satellites, and analysing them is computational work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Administering budgets for programmes, equipment and supporting services
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Administer budgets for programmes, equipment, and support services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (57–65 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Budget tracking and reporting is structured number work that software already does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing applications for public funding to support project financing
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at applications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Write applications for public funding to support project financing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Funding bids can be drafted by software, but a convincing one depends on knowing the funder and the project.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating theories and methods for pollution control
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at theories, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Formulate theories and methods for pollution control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: New pollution control theory needs original scientific thinking that software can support but not lead.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing grant applications to secure funding for sustainability projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at grant applications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Write grant applications to secure funding for sustainability projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafts come easily, but a winning bid needs tailoring to a funder's history and local evidence.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and prioritising energy-saving measures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at measures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Identify and prioritise energy-saving measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ranking savings measures follows documented methods, but the shortlist depends on what someone has seen at the building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the technical feasibility of energy-saving measures based on engineering and energy use knowledge
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the technical feasibility of energy-saving measures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Evaluate the technical feasibility of energy-saving measures based on engineering and energy use knowledge.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Feasibility judgements draw on well-documented engineering rules, though site specifics come from someone who has been there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying methods to boost energy efficiency in commercial building HVAC systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Identify methods to boost energy efficiency in commercial building HVAC systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Heating and cooling efficiency options are thoroughly documented, so software can shortlist them for an engineer to check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining patterns of building use to identify annual or monthly heating
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patterns, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Determine patterns of building use to identify annual or monthly heating, cooling, lighting, or other energy needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Usage patterns come out of meter and booking data, which software reads well, with occasional checks on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating energy usage in manufacturing processes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at energy usage, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Evaluate energy usage in manufacturing processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Energy use in manufacturing is assessed from metered and process data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting recommendations on containment, clean-up process, remediation, recycling and waste disposal to address environmental issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at recommendations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/02, 2152/04
Source: “Present recommendations on containment, clean-up process, remediation, recycling, and waste disposal to address environmental issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The recommendations rest on documented options and can be drafted well, though someone presents and defends them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising clients on environmental and legal regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/03
Source: “Advise clients on environmental and legal regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulatory advice draws on published rules that software summarises well, with a professional confirming it for the client.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating water, energy and materials usage to identify reduction opportunities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at water, energy and materials usage, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Investigate water, energy, and materials usage to identify reduction opportunities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Usage data analysis is a natural fit for software, with some checking of what happens on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with procurement team to identify energy-efficient products and services
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at procurement team, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Collaborate with procurement team to identify energy-efficient products and services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Product research suits software well, but agreeing choices with the procurement team is a live working relationship.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising and collaborating with professionals to address environmental problems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at professionals, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Advise and collaborate with professionals to address environmental problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The technical advice is well documented, but working it through with other professionals is a live discussion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising policy makers on environmental regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at policy makers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Advise policy makers on environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The regulatory analysis is well documented, but advising policy makers works through relationships and live discussion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and collaborating in the setting of sustainability KPIs for the wider business/organisation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the setting of sustainability kpis, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Identify and collaborate in the setting of sustainability KPIs for the wider business/organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Indicators are well documented, but agreeing them across a business is a negotiation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing environmental restoration studies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environmental restoration studies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Design environmental restoration studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Study design follows documented scientific method, but the choices depend on the particular site and its history.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or evaluating designs for contaminant treatment or disposal facilities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Review or evaluate designs for contaminant treatment or disposal facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can check a design against standards, but judging whether a treatment scheme will work needs experienced review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the effectiveness of programmes to achieve desired outcomes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the effectiveness of programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Evaluate the effectiveness of programmes to achieve desired outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a programme worked needs local outcome data and judgement, so software gives only a partial draft.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing job specification sheets for home energy improvements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at job specification sheets, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/01
Source: “Prepare job specification sheets for home energy improvements, such as loft insulation, window retrofits, or heating system upgrades.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Job specifications for insulation or heating work follow standard formats, though the property itself has to be looked at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the environmental impact of business operations to comply with regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the environmental impact of business operations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Assess the environmental impact of business operations to comply with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (45–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compliance assessments follow published rules and company data, so a strong draft can be produced from a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out environmental impact assessments
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environmental impact assessments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Carry out environmental impact assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (45–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessments follow set methods and standard datasets, so most of the report can be drafted at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying hazards and assessing risks to human health on environmental health matters
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at hazards, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Identify hazards and assess risks to human health on environmental health matters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (45–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk assessment methods are well published, so software can produce a solid draft from monitoring data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing proposed developments
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at proposed developments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/03
Source: “Assess proposed developments for physical, environmental, and social impacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessment follows documented methods, though the proposed site usually needs visiting to judge properly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning and coordinating the delivery of complex technical input for environmental projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the delivery of complex technical input, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Plan and coordinate the delivery of complex technical input for environmental projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating complex technical input relies on knowing the people and the project rather than published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating scientific or technical support for environmental programmes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Coordinate scientific or technical support for environmental programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating technical support across a programme depends on knowing who does what inside the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning goals and targets to advance environmental research and conservation efforts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at goals, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/04
Source: “Plan goals and targets to advance environmental research and conservation efforts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting research and conservation goals is a judgement call about priorities that people in the organisation make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and recommending specific safety measures against hazardous work methods and materials
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific safety measures against hazardous work methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/04
Source: “Identify and recommend specific safety measures against hazardous work methods and materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (45–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Hazard controls are well documented, so recommendations can largely be produced from published guidance and site information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing best practice in corporate
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at best practice, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Implement best practice in corporate, ethical, and social responsibility areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Putting responsibility practice into daily operation depends on people changing how they work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing environmental management systems to continually improve the organisation's environmental impact
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environmental management systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Develop and implement environmental management systems to continually improve the organisation's environmental impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Management systems follow published standards, so software drafts them well, though embedding them needs people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in the development and implementation of energy efficiency initiatives and programs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the development, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2152/01
Source: “Assist in the development and implementation of energy efficiency initiatives and programs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software drafts and analyses efficiency plans well, but getting them running still needs people on site and in the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating scientific and technical information to relevant audiences in an appropriate form
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Communicate scientific and technical information to relevant audiences in an appropriate form, such as reports, workshops, educational events, and public consultations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The written material is well handled by software, but workshops and consultations need someone there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting updates on the status of environmental engineering initiatives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at updates, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/04
Source: “Present updates on the status of environmental engineering initiatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress updates are drafted well from project data, though someone attends the meeting to give them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing methods to minimise the environmental impact of industrial production processes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Develop methods to minimise the environmental impact of industrial production processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cleaner production methods are partly documented, but the useful answer depends on the particular factory process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing legislative issues for clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at legislative issues, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2152/03
Source: “Manage legislative issues for clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking legislative issues is documented work, but clients rely on a named adviser to interpret it for them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing environments' natural ability to remove contaminants from air
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environments' natural ability, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/04
Source: “Assess environments' natural ability to remove contaminants from air, water, or soil.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Natural attenuation depends on site-specific conditions that have to be measured rather than looked up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating and approving proposals for sustainability projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at proposals, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Evaluate and approve proposals for sustainability projects, considering factors such as cost effectiveness, technical feasibility, and integration with other initiatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Approving a proposal is a judgement about cost and fit that someone in the organisation has to own.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to plans for restoring environments like waste disposal sites
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Contribute to plans for restoring environments like waste disposal sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Restoration plans follow published guidance and can be largely drafted at a desk, with site visits filling the gaps.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Guiding energy engineers in environmental planning for restoration projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at energy engineers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Guide energy engineers in environmental planning for restoration projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The planning knowledge is documented, but guiding other engineers is an ongoing working relationship.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating contracts for services or materials needed for environmental clean-up
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at contracts, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2152/02, 2152/05
Source: “Negotiate contracts for services or materials needed for environmental clean-up.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract terms can be drafted by software, but negotiating them is a live commercial conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with clients to identify their requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2152/02
Source: “Liaise with clients to identify their requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Drawing out what a client actually needs happens in conversation with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with colleagues to build on existing CSR initiatives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at colleagues, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Collaborate with colleagues to build on existing CSR initiatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building on existing initiatives with colleagues works through ongoing relationships inside the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading sustainable procurement practices for all goods and services
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at sustainable procurement practices, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Lead sustainable procurement practices for all goods and services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Sustainable procurement means influencing buyers and suppliers, which happens through working relationships.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting research findings to relevant stakeholders to support project development
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles research findings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/03
Source: “Present research findings to relevant stakeholders to support project development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The slides can be prepared automatically, but presenting to stakeholders and answering them is live.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing instructional programmes in collaboration with other teachers and professionals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles instructional programmes and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Develop instructional programmes in collaboration with other teachers and professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Course content can be drafted quickly, but agreeing it with other teachers is people work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising clients on improving energy efficiency
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles clients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Advise clients on improving energy efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (34–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Energy-saving advice is well documented and easy to generate, though clients often want it explained by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing measures to enhance water and air quality at contaminated sites
staying human
The ratings behind this row put measures well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Design measures to enhance water and air quality at contaminated sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Remediation designs draw on documented techniques, but the contamination at a given site drives the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drafting plans for building work
staying human
The ratings behind this row put plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Draft plans for building work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can produce drawings and outline plans, but a specific building's constraints still need a person's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning land conservation programmes for industrial development projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put land conservation programmes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Plan land conservation programmes for industrial development projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Conservation planning follows documented approaches, but the land itself shapes what is workable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing systems, processes or equipment for control, management or remediation of water, air or soil quality
staying human
The ratings behind this row put systems, processes or equipment well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 90 · 2152/04
Source: “Design systems, processes, or equipment for control, management, or remediation of water, air, or soil quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can produce outline designs, but a specific site's remediation scheme needs engineering judgement and local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and mitigating risks associated with community energy initiatives
staying human
The ratings behind this row put risks well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2152/01
Source: “Identify and mitigate risks associated with community energy initiatives, ensuring project success and safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk registers follow documented patterns, but spotting the risks that matter needs local knowledge of the project.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on the development and prosecution of regulatory cases
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for advice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Provide advice on the development and prosecution of regulatory cases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Regulatory prosecution advice has to come from someone who will stand behind it if the case goes forward.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating efforts in environmental health and conservation
staying human
The ratings behind this row put efforts well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Coordinate efforts in environmental health and conservation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating conservation work depends on local arrangements and people rather than published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating renewable energy projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put renewable energy projects well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Coordinate renewable energy projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Renewable projects turn on site conditions, contracts and partners rather than anything documented publicly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting the implementation and management of sustainability programmes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the implementation well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Support the implementation and management of sustainability programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Supporting delivery of a programme means chasing, prompting and helping people inside the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining the nature of code violations and actions to be taken
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the nature of code violations, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Determine the nature of code violations and actions to be taken.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Matching what was found against the rules is well-documented work, though deciding on enforcement needs an authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing solutions for clients to hedge against carbon exposure risks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles solutions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/01
Source: “Develop solutions for clients to hedge against carbon exposure risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Carbon hedging solutions are commercially specific and agreed through client conversations rather than pulled from published sources.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with the building supplies industry for material procurement
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the building supplies industry and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/01
Source: “Liaise with the building supplies industry for material procurement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Procurement relationships with suppliers run on ongoing personal contact and terms that are not publicly documented.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and implementing efficient solutions to meet project deadlines
staying human
The ratings behind this row put efficient solutions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2152/03
Source: “Identify and implement efficient solutions to meet project deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding a workable fix under deadline pressure depends on project knowledge that is rarely written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring the implementation of environmental policy and procedures
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the implementation of environmental policy well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Ensure the implementation of environmental policy and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Policies can be drafted easily, but making sure they are followed means people checking and prompting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating pollution control initiatives
staying human
The ratings behind this row put pollution control initiatives well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Coordinate pollution control initiatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating pollution controls depends on site arrangements and people rather than published procedure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting the use of renewable and sustainable energy resources within an organisation or community
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the use of renewable and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Promote the use of renewable and sustainable energy resources within an organisation or community.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Persuading an organisation or community to adopt renewables is done through people, not documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff on energy management topics
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Train staff on energy management topics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training staff is delivered live, and the value comes from the session rather than the slides.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Raising the profile of energy conservation in the community
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the profile of energy conservation and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2152/01
Source: “Raise the profile of energy conservation in the community.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Raising a topic's profile locally depends on people showing up and being known, though the materials can be drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating effectively with team members and other stakeholders to ensure smooth operations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles team members and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/01
Source: “Communicate effectively with team members and other stakeholders to ensure smooth operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Day-to-day coordination with the team happens through conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting environmental sustainability with scientists
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles environmental sustainability and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Promote environmental sustainability with scientists, planners, and construction workers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Persuading planners and site teams to build sustainably is a face-to-face job, not a document one.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff at all levels on environmental issues and responsibilities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Train staff at all levels on environmental issues and responsibilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training staff needs a person in the room, even though the material itself can be drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with teachers to deliver educational content
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles teachers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Work with teachers to deliver educational content.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Content can be drafted quickly, but working out what teachers need happens with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recruiting volunteers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles volunteers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Recruit volunteers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Adverts and screening can be automated, though signing someone up usually needs a person who inspires them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing and maintaining metering and measurement plans using appropriate tools and technologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: measurement plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Implement and maintain metering and measurement plans using appropriate tools and technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Metering plans are documented, yet fitting and looking after meters means being at the site with the kit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing commercial sites for equipment installation to reduce peak period electricity consumption
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: commercial sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Assess commercial sites for equipment installation to reduce peak period electricity consumption.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging where equipment can go needs someone walking the commercial site, even though the calculations are well documented.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Gathering data from site assessments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Gather data from site assessments, environmental monitoring, and third-party reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Some data arrives as documents, but site assessment and monitoring data has to be gathered in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying historical climate change indicators found in locations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: historical climate change indicators found, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Study historical climate change indicators found in locations, such as ice sheets or rock formations to develop climate change models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Building climate models is computational, but the ice and rock records behind them are collected in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing survey data from sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: survey data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Collect and analyse survey data from sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The analysis is computational, but the survey data has to be collected at the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting energy audits to evaluate energy use and to identify conservation and cost reduction measures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: energy audits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2152/01
Source: “Conduct energy audits to evaluate energy use and to identify conservation and cost reduction measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Analysing energy data and writing recommendations is easy to automate, but surveying the building means visiting it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing potential solar installation sites to determine feasibility and design requirements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: potential solar installation sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Assess potential solar installation sites to determine feasibility and design requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Roof and shading analysis can be done from data, though a site visit usually confirms what is actually possible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating contracts with customers and suppliers for energy projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contracts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Negotiate contracts with customers and suppliers for energy projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Draft terms are easy to produce, but negotiating a deal depends on a live relationship between the parties.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or negotiating energy purchase agreements
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles energy purchase agreements and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2152/01
Source: “Review or negotiate energy purchase agreements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract terms can be reviewed automatically, but negotiating a price with a supplier is a conversation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing communication and collaboration with the board of directors
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles communication and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Manage communication and collaboration with the board of directors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Board relationships run on trust built in person, though the papers and updates behind them can be drafted automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing strategies for economic and social benefits through brownfield site regeneration
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles strategies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Implement strategies for economic and social benefits through brownfield site regeneration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Regeneration benefits depend on local politics and partnerships rather than anything written down publicly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing advice and consultation
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2152/03
Source: “Provide advice and consultation to residents, landowners, councils, and other bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Advice on environmental problems is partly documented, but residents and councils want it from a person they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with local authorities and public bodies to ensure regulatory compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles local authorities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Liaise with local authorities and public bodies to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Letters and submissions can be drafted automatically, but building working relationships with regulators involves people talking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying health or safety issues related to planned weatherproofing projects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Identify health or safety issues related to planned weatherproofing projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Safety issues are documented, but spotting them on a specific property means someone looking at the building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring environmental impact of development activities and pollution
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental impact of development activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Monitor environmental impact of development activities and pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Monitoring development impacts needs someone visiting sites and taking readings, alongside the desk analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating pollution sources and their environmental effects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: pollution sources, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Investigate pollution sources and their environmental effects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Tracing pollution sources needs sampling and site visits alongside the documented analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring effects of pollution and recommending prevention or controlling measures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: effects of pollution, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Monitor effects of pollution and recommend prevention or control measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Pollution monitoring needs instruments and site visits, though the recommendations themselves are well documented.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with council services for project compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles council services and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2152/01
Source: “Coordinate with council services for project compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Correspondence can be drafted automatically, but getting things agreed with a council depends on ongoing contact with officers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing or implementing plans for revegetation of brownfield sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Develop or implement plans for revegetation of brownfield sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Revegetation planning depends on local soil and climate detail, and the planting itself happens on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects comply with environmental laws
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Ensure on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects comply with environmental laws, standards, regulations, or other requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Compliance checking on a live clean-up site means being there to see what is actually happening.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating the disposal of surplus materials in an environmentally responsible manner
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the disposal of surplus materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Coordinate the disposal of surplus materials in an environmentally responsible manner.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Arranging disposal involves documented rules, but the materials have to be handled and moved by people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating waste disposal and recycling processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: waste disposal, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/05
Source: “Coordinate waste disposal and recycling processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Scheduling and paperwork can be automated, but keeping waste moving involves sites, contractors and problems on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating income for projects through fundraising activities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles income and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Generate income for projects through fundraising activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: AI can write the appeal, but donors give because of relationships and events run by people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting information to the public
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: information, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/01
Source: “Present information to the public, councillors, and stakeholders at meetings as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides can be drafted by software, but presenting to councillors and the public means being in the meeting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating, delivering and promoting activities and events for specific communities or targeted groups
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Coordinate, deliver, and promote activities and events for specific communities or targeted groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Promotion can be drafted, but delivering community events means being there on the day.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting applied research on environmental topics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: applied research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Conduct applied research on environmental topics, such as waste control or treatment or pollution abatement methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Applied research on treatment and abatement methods needs experiments run with real equipment and materials.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training technicians in environmental practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: technicians, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Train technicians in environmental practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training technicians means demonstrating practice in person, even though the material can be prepared.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering training sessions to staff to improve their expertise
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sessions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Deliver training sessions to staff to improve their expertise.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can build the training, but delivering it to colleagues and answering them live is done in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting awareness of ecological issues in local communities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: awareness of ecological issues, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Promote awareness of ecological issues in local communities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Raising awareness locally means turning up and talking to people, though the materials can be prepared.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training others, such as teachers, in the use of resources
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Train others, such as teachers, in the use of resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training teachers to use resources means showing them in person, though the materials themselves can be prepared.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying environmental contamination sources
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental contamination sources, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Identify environmental contamination sources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Finding where contamination came from needs samples and site investigation as well as desk analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating and reporting on accidents affecting the environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accidents affecting the environment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Investigate and report on accidents affecting the environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The report can be drafted from evidence gathered, but investigating an incident usually means going to the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Following environmental protection standards in daily operations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental protection standards, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Follow environmental protection standards in daily operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Following standards day to day is about how people actually work, not about producing a document.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing training on hazardous material or waste cleanup procedures and technologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hazardous material, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Provide training on hazardous material or waste cleanup procedures and technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Hazardous waste training needs practical demonstration and a trainer in the room, though materials can be drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Demonstrating leadership skills to engage and coordinating stakeholders in community energy projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles leadership skills and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Demonstrate leadership skills to engage and coordinate stakeholders in community energy projects, ensuring project progression.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a community project moving depends on trust built face to face with the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting building envelopes, mechanical systems, electrical systems or processing systems to determine energy consumption
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: envelopes, mechanical systems, electrical systems or processing systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Inspect building envelopes, mechanical systems, electrical systems, or process systems to determine energy consumption.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Meter data helps, but walking a building to check its fabric and plant means being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging and influencing individuals at all levels
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles individuals and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2152/01
Source: “Engage and influence individuals at all levels, effectively negotiating and handling objections to encourage support for community energy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Winning people over and handling objections happens in the room, and depends on who is doing the asking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising environmental technologist students
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles environmental technologist students and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Supervise environmental technologist students.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising students works through a personal relationship built up over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engaging with community organisations to drive social and environmental impact as a business contact
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles community organisations and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Engage with community organisations to drive social and environmental impact as a business contact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with community organisations rests on trust built with named people over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising employees or volunteers working on sustainability projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles employees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2152/05
Source: “Supervise employees or volunteers working on sustainability projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising employees and volunteers depends on a personal working relationship on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engaging community groups in the implementation of educational initiatives
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles community groups and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Engage community groups in the implementation of educational initiatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting community groups involved depends on trust built with named people locally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising staff assigned according to organisational policies and procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/05
Source: “Supervise staff assigned according to organisational policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervision means being on the floor with people, so software can only produce the rotas and paperwork behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting sites to evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability measures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/01
Source: “Inspect sites to evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Site inspections require being on the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting data for energy conservation analyses using worksite observation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Collect data for energy conservation analyses using worksite observation, field inspections, or sub-metering.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Collecting data by walking the site, inspecting and sub-metering requires being there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring cleanup progress at sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cleanup progress, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Monitor cleanup progress at sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Monitoring a clean-up means being at the site to see how the work is progressing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering questions about the natural environment during on-site tours
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: questions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Answer questions about the natural environment during on-site tours.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The facts are well documented, but answering questions on a tour means walking round with the group.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting site assessments to ascertain environmental damage or restoration needs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Conduct site assessments to ascertain environmental damage or restoration needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: A site assessment means walking the ground and taking samples, which cannot be done from a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with local residents to minimise project impacts on the community
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: local residents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Engage with local residents to minimise project impacts on the community.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reassuring local residents about a project depends on trust built in person with the community.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out environmental assessments and collecting relevant data
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/03
Source: “Carry out environmental assessments and collect relevant data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Carrying out the assessment and collecting the data means being on site with equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying previous activities and any contamination on the site through field work
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: previous activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03
Source: “Identify previous activities and any contamination on the site through field work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Finding out what happened on a site through field work means digging, sampling and looking in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Train staff in specific job roles to enhance performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training someone in a job role means showing them at the machine and watching them try.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting hearings on environmental protection issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hearings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Conduct hearings on environmental protection issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A hearing is a formal, in-person process run by an accountable person, not a document that can be generated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising volunteers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: volunteers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Supervise volunteers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising volunteers means being present, spotting problems and responding to people as they work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing plans for debris removal
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/02
Source: “Implement plans for debris removal.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Debris removal is physical clearance work, whatever the plan behind it says.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and responding to environmental incidents affecting wildlife
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental incidents affecting wildlife, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Identify and respond to environmental incidents affecting wildlife, habitats, or assets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Responding to an incident affecting wildlife or habitats means getting to the location quickly in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing installation of equipment to improve energy efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: installation of equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/01
Source: “Oversee installation of equipment to improve energy efficiency, including hot water cylinder jackets and low-flow showerheads.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Overseeing installation means being at the property while the work is fitted, which cannot be done from a screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing plans for groundwater remediation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Implement plans for groundwater remediation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Groundwater remediation is heavy physical work on the ground, not something produced at a screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing strategies to improve soil quality of military test sites and abandoned mine land
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: strategies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Implement strategies to improve soil quality of military test sites and abandoned mine land.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Improving soil on contaminated land means physical treatment work carried out on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting industrial or municipal facilities to evaluate operational effectiveness and ensure environmental regulation compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: industrial, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/04
Source: “Inspect industrial or municipal facilities to evaluate operational effectiveness and ensure environmental regulation compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Inspecting a facility means walking round it and seeing how it actually runs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Giving presentations to schools and community groups
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: presentations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/05
Source: “Give presentations to schools and community groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Presenting to a school or community group means standing in front of them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing environmental construction and remediation schemes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental construction, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/02
Source: “Implement environmental construction and remediation schemes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Carrying out a remediation scheme is physical work at the site, whatever the plan behind it says.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing clean-up operations after environmental incidents
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clean-up operations after environmental incidents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2152/03
Source: “Manage clean-up operations after environmental incidents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running a clean-up after an incident is physical work coordinated on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attending conferences to engage with the academic community
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conferences, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2152/02
Source: “Attend conferences to engage with the academic community.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Conferences are about being in the room and meeting people, which software cannot do for you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Conducting blower-door tests to identify air leaks in buildings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: blower-door tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Conduct blower-door tests to identify air leaks in buildings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The test involves fitting equipment to a building's door, so someone has to be there to do it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing and testing operation of appliances following installation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: operation of appliances following installation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2152/01
Source: “Observe and test operation of appliances following installation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Testing that an appliance works after fitting means hands on the appliance in the property.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Restoring electricity and water supplies in the aftermath of wars or natural disasters
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electricity, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/02
Source: “Restore electricity and water supplies in the aftermath of wars or natural disasters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Restoring power and water after a disaster is physical work in a damaged place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Providing expert witness testimony on issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: expert witness testimony, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2152/02
Source: “Provide expert witness testimony on issues such as soil, air, or water contamination and associated cleanup measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Expert testimony means a specific qualified person appearing and answering questions under oath.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Building scientific instruments and sensors
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: scientific instruments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/02
Source: “Build scientific instruments and sensors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Building instruments and sensors is workshop work with tools and components in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out field surveys to collect data on pollution levels in specific areas
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/03, 2152/04
Source: “Carry out field surveys to collect data on pollution levels in specific areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Field surveys mean going to the location and taking the measurements in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing pollution samples
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: pollution samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2152/04
Source: “Collect and analyse pollution samples, such as air or groundwater.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking air or groundwater samples means being at the location with the sampling equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Decontaminating field equipment used to clean pollutants from soil
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/04
Source: “Decontaminate field equipment used to clean pollutants from soil, air, or water.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning and decontaminating field kit is hands-on work with the equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Weighing or measuring collected sample particles to determine concentration of pollutants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: collected sample particles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2152/04
Source: “Weigh or measure collected sample particles to determine concentration of pollutants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Weighing and measuring sample particles is laboratory bench work done by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading guided walks to interpret the natural environment for groups
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: guided walks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2152/05
Source: “Lead guided walks to interpret the natural environment for groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading a guided walk means being outdoors with the group.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £43,400a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 80,200in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: databases of environmental data in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: managing databases of environmental data for accessibility and interpreting, and applying regulatorying and policy requirements to ensure proposed projects comply with environmental standards. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where site audits get done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Managing databases of environmental data for accessibility is going; conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations is not.

So, given all that: 39% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 20% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 42% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 238 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to environment professionals (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was directors in consultancy services: only about 5% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 39/61: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “assist in the development and implementation of energy efficiency initiatives and programs”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Directors in consultancy services
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “conduct environmental surveys to assess ecological impact and compliance with regulations”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 5% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Waste disposal and environmental services managers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “collect and analyse pollution samples”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Conservation professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “conduct environmental surveys to assess ecological impact and compliance with regulations”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 39% of its task weight, across 238 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Environmental Engineers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Environmental Engineers, Conservation Scientists, Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health, Biological Technicians and Environmental Science and Protection Technicians, Including Health. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for environment professionals, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 39% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for environment professionals. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for environment professionals launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for environment professionals yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for environment professionals existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for environment professionals launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Environment professionals?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 238 official task statements scored for Environment professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2152), 39% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 47 out of 100 (range 41–53, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Environment professionals” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Analyse metered data to track energy consumption and identify trends” (93/100, very high); “Generate a range of media content, such as social media posts, blogs, flyers, newsletters, and briefs, to disseminate information and raise awareness” (93/100, very high); “Promote activities through adverts, leaflets or social media” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Environment professionals” stay human?: About 42% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Lead guided walks to interpret the natural environment for groups” (0/100, minimal); “Weigh or measure collected sample particles to determine concentration of pollutants” (0/100, minimal); “Decontaminate field equipment used to clean pollutants from soil, air, or water” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Environment professionals” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 39% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 42% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Environment professionals calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 238 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
45 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.