Will AI replace Directors in consultancy services?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 125 official task statements scored for Directors in consultancy services (United Kingdom, SOC 1258), 36% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 47 out of 100 (range 41–53, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Directors in consultancy services” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Manage databases of environmental data for accessibility” (93/100, very high); “Prepare staff handbooks” (93/100, very high); “Analyse data to determine its validity, quality, and scientific significance” (83/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Directors in consultancy services” stay human?

About 42% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary” (0/100, minimal); “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used” (0/100, minimal); “Carry out field surveys to collect data on pollution levels in specific areas” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Directors in consultancy services” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 36% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 42% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Directors in consultancy services calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 125 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Directors in consultancy services

drafting competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects, reporting findings from environmental data analysis and evaluating marketing effectiveness for the organisation or clients. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: drafting competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 36%
changing shape: 22%
staying human: 42%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 47 out of 100 (41–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 125 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for directors in consultancy services is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. The ledger below shows which rows you can move toward.

Your week, as this page understands it

Directors in consultancy services plan, organise, direct and co-ordinate the activities, resources and development of consultancies working in a variety of sectors, liaise with clients and promotes their business. The job title says “directors in consultancy services”. The real job is the part underneath: training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But directors in consultancy services is not one task. It is 125 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 36%
changing shape: 22%
staying human: 42%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

Shifting to AI

45 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Drafting competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects
This is reading one thing and writing another: competitive proposals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 1258/04
Source: “Draft competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Consultancy proposals follow familiar structures, so software drafts strong first versions for a director to sharpen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on developing policies for environmental management
This is reading one thing and writing another: developing policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 1258/02
Source: “Advise on developing policies for environmental management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Policy drafting draws on widely published frameworks, so software can produce solid material for people to refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing data to determine its validity
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Analyse data to determine its validity, quality, and scientific significance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging data quality and significance uses well-documented statistical methods that software applies reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing business developments and monitoring market trends
This is reading one thing and writing another: business developments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/01
Source: “Analyse business developments and monitor market trends.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking and summarising market information is desk research that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

28 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Developing marketing strategies to enhance brand visibility and increase market share
The software now makes the first pass at strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 1258/01
Source: “Develop marketing strategies to enhance brand visibility and increase market share.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafts come easily, but a strategy that fits this business needs commercial judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating theories and methods for pollution control
The software now makes the first pass at theories, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Formulate theories and methods for pollution control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: New pollution control theory needs original scientific thinking that software can support but not lead.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing marketing strategies to promote the business in new or niche markets
The software now makes the first pass at strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 1258/01
Source: “Develop and implement marketing strategies to promote the business in new or niche markets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Plans can be drafted, but choosing and entering a new market needs commercial judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

52 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance
This work happens in the physical world: staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 1258/02, 1258/04
Source: “Train staff in specific job roles to enhance performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training someone in a job role means showing them at the machine and watching them try.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring compliance with environmental legislation
The ratings behind this row put compliance well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 90 · 1258/02
Source: “Ensure compliance with environmental legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental rules are published and easy to check, though staying compliant needs someone visiting operations and acting on what they find.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the environmental impacts of engineering
The ratings behind this row put the environmental impacts well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Assess the environmental impacts of engineering, architecture, or research and development activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessment methods are documented, but the decisive details are specific to the site, so software gives a partial draft.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 115 tasks

Managing databases of environmental data for accessibility
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases of environmental data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Manage databases of environmental data for accessibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Organising and maintaining a data catalogue is exactly the sort of structured work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing staff handbooks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: staff handbooks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/03
Source: “Prepare staff handbooks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Staff handbooks follow widely published templates, so software drafts them from the firm's own policies and terms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining data collection methods for research projects or surveys
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data collection methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Determine data collection methods for research projects or surveys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing a data collection method follows well-published research practice, which software advises on confidently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting correlations between human activities and environmental effects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: correlations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Interpret correlations between human activities and environmental effects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Linking human activity to environmental effects uses large published datasets that software analyses well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Planning research models using mathematical concepts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Plan research models using mathematical concepts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up research models on mathematical foundations is well-documented work software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing forms and reports to identify problems and improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: forms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Review forms and reports to identify problems and improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing forms and reports for problems is checking documents against well-known standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting a variety of data and analysing results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a variety of data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 1258/04
Source: “Interpret a variety of data and analyse results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting varied data and drawing out results is analysis with abundant documented method behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing charts, graphs or sketches for environmental assessment reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: charts, graphs or sketches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Prepare charts, graphs, or sketches for environmental assessment reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Charts and figures for assessment reports are produced directly from the data, which software does at least as well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research on consumer opinions and marketing strategies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Conduct research on consumer opinions and marketing strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and summarising research on consumer opinion and strategy is desk work software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying target audiences
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: target audiences in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Identify target audiences for products, services, or technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Segmenting audiences from available data is analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and analysing sales promotion results to determine cost effectiveness of promotion campaigns
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: sales promotion results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Monitor and analyse sales promotion results to determine cost effectiveness of promotion campaigns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out whether a promotion paid for itself is straightforward analysis of figures already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring performance against agreed sales targets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: performance against agreed sales targets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Monitor performance against agreed sales targets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking performance against agreed targets is standard reporting from sales systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring programme budgets, expenses and campaign response rates to evaluate each campaign based on objectives and industry norms
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: programme budgets, expenses and campaign response rates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Monitor programme budgets, expenses, and campaign response rates to evaluate each campaign based on objectives and industry norms.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking spend against response rates is straightforward analysis of recorded figures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating written documents and presentations for marketing plans and campaigns
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: written documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Create written documents and presentations for marketing plans and campaigns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing and building the deck is quick for software, though the plan itself needs the business's own thinking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying contacts for promotional campaigns and industry programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: contacts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Identify contacts for promotional campaigns and industry programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building contact lists from directories and industry sources is research software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting layouts and advertising copy for adherence to specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: layouts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Inspect layouts and advertising copy for adherence to specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking layouts and copy against a specification is systematic and largely automatable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing illustrations to design presentations for products or services
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: illustrations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Review illustrations to design presentations for products or services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assembling and reviewing illustrations for a presentation is well-supported desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Submitting estimates for programme costs as part of campaign plan development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: estimates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Submit estimates for programme costs as part of campaign plan development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost estimates follow from known rates and the campaign plan.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Editing scripts, audio, video and other promotional material to ensure specification compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scripts, audio, video and other promotional material in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 1258/01
Source: “Edit scripts, audio, video, and other promotional material to ensure specification compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking scripts and media against a specification is systematic work software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing data to provide strategic business insights
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/03
Source: “Analyse data to provide strategic business insights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data for business insight is squarely what current software is good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods, inventory control and cost
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/03
Source: “Analyse organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods, inventory control, and cost.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing how work, information and costs flow through an organisation is analysis of records already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and organising information on problems or procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Collect and organise information on problems or procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and tidying up information about problems and procedures is exactly what software is good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing records management processes and policies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records management processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Develop records management processes and policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Records policies follow well-established patterns, so software can draft them around the organisation's own needs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting investigative activities to provide comprehensive analysis and recommendations for business improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: investigative activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Document investigative activities to provide comprehensive analysis and recommendations for business improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up investigation work with analysis and recommendations is drafting from material already gathered.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning study of work problems and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: study of work problems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Plan study of work problems and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing a study of work problems is structured planning software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending changes to business forms and reports for improved efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Recommend changes to business forms and reports for improved efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting better forms and reports is document work software does well from the existing versions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing modifications to test or build plans based on data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: modifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/03
Source: “Propose modifications to test or build plans based on data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting changes to test or build plans follows directly from analysing the results already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending purchases of new equipment to enhance operational capabilities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: purchases of new equipment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/03
Source: “Recommend purchases of new equipment to enhance operational capabilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing equipment options and writing a recommendation is research and drafting software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing work schedules to optimise team productivity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: work schedules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Prepare work schedules to optimise team productivity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a rota is a scheduling problem software solves, given the team's constraints.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing performance data to measure productivity and identify areas for improvement
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: performance data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Review performance data to measure productivity and identify areas for improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading productivity figures and naming where to improve is analysis software does quickly and clearly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing environmental data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Analyse environmental data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental data analysis is documented, repeatable desk work, and the results usually feed a report someone else signs off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and interpreting licence and registration requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: licence in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Assess and interpret licence and registration requirements, including environmental permits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Permit and licence requirements are published in full, so software can set out clearly what applies to a project.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting, and applying regulatorying and policy requirements to ensure proposed projects comply with environmental standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: policy requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Interpret and apply regulatory and policy requirements to ensure proposed projects comply with environmental standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental rules and project documents are both written down, so software can match one against the other and flag the gaps.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting findings from environmental data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Report findings from environmental data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once environmental data is analysed, writing the findings up is a documented job software does to a good first-draft standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating technical content for administrative orders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical content in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Create technical content for administrative orders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical wording for administrative orders follows set formats and published rules, so software drafts it to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching and drafting legal documents for environmental compliance and consultancy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Research and draft legal documents for environmental compliance and consultancy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental compliance documents follow published law and precedent, so software drafts them for a lawyer or client to review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing planning applications for clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 1258/04
Source: “Prepare planning applications for clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning applications follow a set format with published guidance, so software drafts them; anyone may prepare one for a client.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Complying with national and local policies and legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: national in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Comply with national and local policies and legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Staying within national and local rules is checking documented requirements, which software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating marketing effectiveness for the organisation or clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: effectiveness in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Evaluate marketing effectiveness for the organisation or clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measuring what worked is data analysis, though the conclusions get discussed with clients or colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing budgets for campaigns, including preparing client costings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Manage budgets for campaigns, including preparing client costings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Costings and budget tracking are routine calculations, though clients discuss them with a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Publicising the service to increase visibility
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the service in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Publicise the service to increase visibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Publicity material drafts easily, though placing it well benefits from knowing the audience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating and distributing marketing materials for new products targeting the public
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at materials, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Create and distribute marketing materials for new products targeting the public.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Materials can be drafted and published digitally, though print and events still need people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing detailed reports on property to assess investment potential
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed reports, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Write detailed reports on property to assess investment potential.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Investment reports on property follow set structures and use market data, so software drafts them capably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modifying project plans to accommodate client design changes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at project plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 1258/04
Source: “Modify project plans to accommodate client design changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reworking project plans around client design changes is structured planning work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding quickly to changes in government policies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 1258/04
Source: “Respond quickly to changes in government policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reacting to government policy changes is reading published announcements and working out what they mean for clients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contacting organisations to explain services and facilities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisations, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Contact organisations to explain services and facilities offered.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Approaching organisations to explain services is outreach where the conversation matters, though the materials are easily drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Allocating work to staff to maximise productivity and resource
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at work, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/04
Source: “Allocate work to staff to maximise productivity and resource use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Allocating work against skills and capacity is scheduling that software handles well, though people need to accept it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting the use of effective land management and administration as one of the key drivers behind economic development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the use of effective land management, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Promote the use of effective land management and administration as one of the key drivers behind economic development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Making the case for good land management is advocacy and writing, which software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning and coordinating advertising campaigns and sales promotions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at campaigns, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Plan and coordinate advertising campaigns and sales promotions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Plans draft easily, but coordinating a live campaign means working with several teams.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating scientific or technical support for environmental programmes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Coordinate scientific or technical support for environmental programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating technical support across a programme depends on knowing who does what inside the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing organisational changes to meet strategic objectives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisational changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Propose organisational changes to meet strategic objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Change proposals can be drafted from analysis, though the recommendation needs shaping by someone who knows the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conferring with management and users about format
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at management, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 1258/03
Source: “Confer with management and users about format, distribution, and purpose of forms and reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Requirements can be captured and drafted, but the useful detail comes from talking to the people using the forms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating scientific and technical information to relevant audiences in an appropriate form
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Communicate scientific and technical information to relevant audiences in an appropriate form, such as reports, workshops, educational events, and public consultations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The written material is well handled by software, but workshops and consultations need someone there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning land conservation programmes for industrial development projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at land conservation programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Plan land conservation programmes for industrial development projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Conservation plans follow documented method, but the decisive detail is the specific land, its habitats and local agreement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing infrastructure needs for new developments to support planning applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at infrastructure needs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 1258/04
Source: “Assess infrastructure needs for new developments to support planning applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Infrastructure need assessments follow documented methods, but the decisive local detail sits with councils and utilities rather than public data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Formulating plans to extend business with established accounts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Formulate plans to extend business with established accounts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Plans can be drafted, but they rest on what the account manager knows about the client.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing methods to minimise the environmental impact of industrial production processes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Develop methods to minimise the environmental impact of industrial production processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cleaner production methods are partly documented, but the useful answer depends on the particular factory process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on the development and prosecution of regulatory cases
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Provide advice on the development and prosecution of regulatory cases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advising on regulatory cases is desk research software supports; only running a prosecution in court is reserved to authorised lawyers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring successful functioning of newly implemented systems or procedures with concerned personnel
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at successful functioning of newly implemented systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 1258/03
Source: “Ensure successful functioning of newly implemented systems or procedures with concerned personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Bedding in a new system depends on working through snags with the people using it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring compliance with the conditions of the tenancy on behalf of a landlord
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at compliance, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Ensure compliance with the conditions of the tenancy on behalf of a landlord.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking a tenant is meeting lease conditions is document and record work with occasional visits to the property.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting clear and measurable objectives for the team
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clear, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Set clear and measurable objectives for the team.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Objectives can be drafted, but agreeing them with a team is a management conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with customers, company officials, sales departments and advertising agencies to tailor promotional material
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at customers, company officials, sales departments and advertising agencies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Work with customers, company officials, sales departments, and advertising agencies to tailor promotional material.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Drafting is quick, though tailoring material happens through discussion with several parties.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating the production of adverts or promotions with production teams
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the production of adverts, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Coordinate the production of adverts or promotions with production teams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Briefs and schedules can be drafted, though production is a hands-on collaboration.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with digital advertising agencies to manage paid media campaigns
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at digital advertising agencies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Coordinate with digital advertising agencies to manage paid media campaigns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Briefs and reporting can be drafted, but managing an agency relationship is a working partnership.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing daily operations of departments
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at operations of departments, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Direct daily operations of departments, coordinating project activities with other departments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a department day to day is largely coordination between colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating staff performance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at staff performance, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Evaluate staff performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Performance data can be summarised automatically, but appraising someone's work is a conversation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying law for landlord and tenant negotiations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for law, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Apply law for landlord and tenant negotiations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Applying landlord and tenant law is well-documented analysis software drafts well, though the negotiation itself is human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining the nature of code violations and actions to be taken
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the nature of code violations well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Determine the nature of code violations and actions to be taken.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deciding what has been breached and what happens next follows written codes, but usually needs someone who has seen the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specialising in an area, planning and development policy, regeneration appraisal or compulsory purchase
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for an area, planning and development policy, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Specialise in an area such as planning and development policy, regeneration appraisal, or compulsory purchase.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (25–49 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Deep specialism in an area like compulsory purchase rests on years of casework judgement clients pay for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing properties for business rates
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for properties, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 1258/04
Source: “Assess properties for business rates, capital taxation, and for acquisitions and disposals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assessing property for rates, tax or a sale draws on market data, but the figure carries professional responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating activities of finance and researching departments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles activities of finance and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Coordinate activities of finance and research departments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordination between finance and research happens through people agreeing priorities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating activities of sales, graphic arts and media departments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles activities of sales, graphic arts and media departments and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Coordinate activities of sales, graphic arts, and media departments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating sales, design and media teams is mostly about people agreeing priorities together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Discussing contracts, selection of advertising media or products to be advertised with department heads or staff
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contracts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Discuss contracts, selection of advertising media, or products to be advertised with department heads or staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The work is a live discussion where people weigh contract and media options together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating with media sales companies for the best rates and spaces in advertising
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles media sales companies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Negotiate with media sales companies for the best rates and spaces in advertising.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Negotiating rates and space turns on live give-and-take with the other side.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing departmental goals and objectives with organisation officials
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles departmental goals and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Implement departmental goals and objectives with organisation officials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Goals can be drafted automatically, but agreeing them with senior colleagues is a discussion between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring effects of pollution and recommending prevention or controlling measures
staying human
The ratings behind this row put effects of pollution well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Monitor effects of pollution and recommend prevention or control measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pollution effects need field data someone collects, but recommending controls afterwards follows well-documented practice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring environmental impact of development activities and pollution
staying human
The ratings behind this row put environmental impact of development activities well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Monitor environmental impact of development activities and pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring impact needs site data someone gathers, though interpreting and reporting the results is documented desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Appraising the performance of buildings
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the performance of buildings well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Appraise the performance of buildings in use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building performance judgements lean on site knowledge and readings that are not all in the files, so software gets partway at best.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Evaluating and selecting optimal locations for construction projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put optimal locations well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 1258/04
Source: “Evaluate and select optimal locations for construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Site selection weighs local factors that are not fully written down, so software supports the shortlist rather than making the call.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing proposed developments
staying human
The ratings behind this row put proposed developments well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 1258/04
Source: “Assess proposed developments for physical, environmental, and social impacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessments follow published methods, though the details that decide them are specific to the site and the community.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing the impact of projects on local communities and ecosystems
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the impact of projects well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Assess the impact of projects on local communities and ecosystems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging effects on communities and habitats mixes published method with local knowledge and site visits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing the management of energy
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the management of energy well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Oversee the management of energy, water, air, and land resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Overseeing energy, water, air and land resources combines documented reporting with decisions made on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing rental properties for owners
staying human
The ratings behind this row put rental properties well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 1258/04
Source: “Manage rental properties for owners.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Property management is largely records and correspondence software handles, with viewings, inspections and tenant contact needing a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting successful negotiations by applying tactics and techniques to achieve desired outcomes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles successful negotiations and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 1258/04
Source: “Conduct successful negotiations by applying tactics and techniques to achieve desired outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A successful negotiation depends on reading the other party live and adjusting in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training workers in use of new forms
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles workers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 1258/03
Source: “Train workers in use of new forms, reports, procedures, or equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training materials can be produced by software, but teaching people to use new kit happens in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Valuing properties by applying expert knowledge and awareness of the local property market
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for properties, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 1258/04
Source: “Value properties by applying expert knowledge and awareness of the local property market.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (26–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A formal property valuation must be signed by a registered valuer, though comparable evidence can be gathered automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing valuations for commercial and residential developments
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for valuations, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 1258/04
Source: “Provide valuations for commercial and residential developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Valuations can be modelled from market data, though lenders and clients expect a qualified valuer's name on the figure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating tenancy agreements confidently, both orally and in writing
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles tenancy agreements confidently and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Negotiate tenancy agreements confidently, both orally and in writing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Negotiating a tenancy turns on live give and take with the other side, not just the wording.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading projects from start to end to ensure accurate land assessments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles projects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/04
Source: “Lead projects from start to end to ensure accurate land assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading a project end to end means holding client confidence and steering a team through changes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting on financing options and the feasibility of obtaining planning permission for projects
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for financing options, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Consult on financing options and the feasibility of obtaining planning permission for projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Whether planning permission is likely depends on local knowledge and relationships that are not written down anywhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying the materials used and the waste
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Identify the materials used and the waste produced, including pollutants and noise.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Identifying materials, waste, pollutants and noise on a project needs someone looking at the actual site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating policies in consultation with the board of directors
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles policies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 1258/04
Source: “Formulate policies in consultation with the board of directors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Policy drafts are easy to produce, but board agreement is built through discussion between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing large property portfolios for clients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for large property portfolios, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Manage large property portfolios for clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a large property portfolio combines routine reporting with client trust and decisions on individual buildings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating pollution sources and their environmental effects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: pollution sources, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Investigate pollution sources and their environmental effects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Tracing a pollution source means going out and sampling, so software can only help interpret what someone else collects.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating and reporting on accidents affecting the environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accidents affecting the environment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Investigate and report on accidents affecting the environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Environmental accidents are investigated at the scene, though the report afterwards is documented desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting applied research on environmental topics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: applied research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Conduct applied research on environmental topics, such as waste control or treatment or pollution abatement methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Applied research on treatment and abatement methods needs experiments run with real equipment and materials.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training technicians in environmental practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: technicians, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Train technicians in environmental practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training technicians means demonstrating practice in person, even though the material can be prepared.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting environmental surveys to assess ecological impact and compliance with regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Conduct environmental surveys to assess ecological impact and compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Ecological surveys mean going out to the site, and protected-species work needs someone holding the right survey licence.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing and motivating teams to increase sales
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Manage and motivate teams to increase sales.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Motivating a sales team depends on trust built with those people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing sales team to achieve sales targets
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles sales team and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Manage sales team to achieve sales targets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading a sales team to hit targets depends on relationships and motivation only a person can carry.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing presentation support during new product and service introductions to field staff and customers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: presentation support during new product, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Provide presentation support during new product and service introductions to field staff and customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supporting a live introduction means being present with field staff and customers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Following environmental protection standards in daily operations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental protection standards, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Follow environmental protection standards in daily operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Following environmental standards day to day is something people do on site, not a document software can produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing and coordinating product research and development
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles product research and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/01
Source: “Direct and coordinate product research and development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Steering research and development means guiding people and choices inside the business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting interviews with staff and managers about their job responsibilities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles interviews and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 1258/03
Source: “Conduct interviews with staff and managers about their job responsibilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing staff about their jobs depends on a live conversation and on people being willing to talk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising environmental technologist students
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles environmental technologist students and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 1258/02
Source: “Supervise environmental technologist students.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising students works through a personal relationship built up over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Purchasing land
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for land, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 1258/04
Source: “Purchase land.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Buying land is a negotiated transaction with legal steps and counterparties that only people can complete.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in product launches to enhance marketing strategies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: product launches, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Participate in product launches to enhance marketing strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking part in a launch means being there with colleagues and customers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site audits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/02
Source: “Conduct site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: A site audit means walking the site and seeing conditions first-hand; only the write-up afterwards is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting construction work on site to ensure its adherence to the design plans
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/04
Source: “Inspect construction work on site to ensure its adherence to the design plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Construction inspection means being on site comparing what is built against the drawings, so a person has to attend.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selling and buying properties and sites on behalf of clients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: properties, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 1258/04
Source: “Sell and buy properties and sites on behalf of clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Buying and selling property for clients involves viewings, negotiation and the client's trust in their agent.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attending conferences and events related to a product or sector
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conferences, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 1258/01
Source: “Attending conferences and events related to a product or sector.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The value of a conference is in being there and meeting people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Distributing promotional materials at meetings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: promotional materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 1258/01
Source: “Distribute promotional materials at meetings, conferences, or trade shows.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Handing out materials at meetings and trade shows needs someone there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out field surveys to collect data on pollution levels in specific areas
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 1258/02
Source: “Carry out field surveys to collect data on pollution levels in specific areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Field surveys mean going to the location and taking the measurements in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site observation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 1258/03
Source: “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Watching equipment and staff at work requires being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Visiting construction sites to gather measurements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 1258/04
Source: “Visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking measurements on a construction site requires someone physically there with the equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: No median pay figure is published for this exact group, so there is none here. We would rather show you the gap than a number borrowed from somewhere else.The ONS doesn't publish a reliable pay figure for this exact job (too few people in its survey sample), so none is shown here.
People doing this job: 65,100in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: competitive proposals in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: drafting competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects and advising on developing policies for environmental management. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where staff gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Drafting competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects is going; training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance is not.

So, given all that: 36% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 22% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 42% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 125 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to directors in consultancy services (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was sales accounts and business development managers: only about 14% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 36/64: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “ensure compliance with environmental legislation”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Sales accounts and business development managers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already manage sales team to achieve sales targets, and their equivalent is to achieve sales targets. Across both published task lists that is about 14% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 14% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on. This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Advertising accounts managers and creative directors
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “manage and motivate teams to increase sales”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 11% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 11% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on. This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Marketing, sales and advertising directors
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “manage and motivate teams to increase sales”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 11% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 11% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on. This release publishes no median pay for that job, so I cannot show you what the move costs or pays. I do not recommend a move I cannot price.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 36% of its task weight, across 125 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

If you run a team doing this job

If you run a team doing this job, the conversation you owe them is the one on this page, and sooner than feels comfortable. Show them the ledger rather than a reassurance: the rows moving toward the software are drafting competitive proposals for surveying consultancy projects, and the rows that are not are where you want your people visible. Ask each of them to do the this-week move and bring the list to your next one-to-one. It turns a rumour into a piece of work, and it tells you which parts of your team's week are actually at stake. And say the thing out loud that a team lead usually leaves unsaid: a shrinking team is your exposure too, so do the move yourself as well.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Management Analysts is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

In US official statistics this job is counted as Management Analysts. Pay and employment stay on this page’s own group; the task list and the scores do not cross over.

Your route through this

Two honest options, and no deadline on either

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

A nearby route

There's no Space built for consultancy directors yet.

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

The closest match is The AI Authority, a community for non-technical managers and domain experts turning one-off AI prompts into workflows a team can trust. It overlaps with the part of your job that is growing: turning your own judgement into AI workflows you can hand to someone else. It is a general professional Space and knows nothing about your sector. If that overlap isn't you, the free route below covers the same ground.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

After the trial it is a paid community, and you get identical data either way. If the overlap above is not your job, the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for consultancy directors launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Directors in consultancy services?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 125 official task statements scored for Directors in consultancy services (United Kingdom, SOC 1258), 36% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 47 out of 100 (range 41–53, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Directors in consultancy services” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Manage databases of environmental data for accessibility” (93/100, very high); “Prepare staff handbooks” (93/100, very high); “Analyse data to determine its validity, quality, and scientific significance” (83/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Directors in consultancy services” stay human?: About 42% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Visit construction sites to gather measurements as necessary” (0/100, minimal); “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used” (0/100, minimal); “Carry out field surveys to collect data on pollution levels in specific areas” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Directors in consultancy services” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 36% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 42% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Directors in consultancy services calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 125 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

The ONS doesn't publish a reliable pay figure for this exact job (too few people in its survey sample), so none is shown here.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
73 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
ASHE suppresses or does not publish a median for this unit group. We leave it empty rather than interpolating one from sibling groups, which would be a fabricated number.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: no pay figure published for this groupnomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.