Will AI replace Inspectors of standards and regulations?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 273 official task statements scored for Inspectors of standards and regulations (United Kingdom, SOC 3581), 19% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 29 out of 100 (range 25–35, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Inspectors of standards and regulations” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Keep up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments” (100/100, very high); “Maintain work logs to record daily activities and progress” (93/100, very high); “Collect fees for driving licences to process applications” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Inspectors of standards and regulations” stay human?

About 69% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conduct low-pressure fuel evaluative tests to assess harmful emissions from vehicles lacking OBD equipment” (0/100, minimal); “Test vehicle components and systems using diagnostic equipment” (0/100, minimal); “Attach onboard diagnostics (OBD) scanner cables to vehicles to conduct emissions inspections” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Inspectors of standards and regulations” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 19% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 69% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Inspectors of standards and regulations calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 273 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Inspectors of standards and regulations

issuing licences, permits or other official documentation, identifying emissions testing procedures and standards appropriate for the age and technology of vehicles and maintaining logbooks recording inspection and maintenance activities. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI is already taking a real slice of the routine work here: maintaining work logs to record daily activities and progress. That is a slice of tasks, not of you.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 19%
changing shape: 13%
staying human: 69%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 29 out of 100 (25–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 273 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for inspectors of standards and regulations is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

That slice is not coming back; the core of the job, conducting structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures, stays yours. The tools change hands, the accountability doesn't.

Your week, as this page understands it

Inspectors of standards and regulations undertake investigations and inspections to verify and ensure compliance with acts, regulations and other requirements in respect of: buildings, weights, measures and trade descriptions; the installation and safety of electrical, gas and water supplies and equipment; marine pollution, ships’ structures, equipment and accommodation; the treatment of animals; the operation of commercial vehicles; the welfare, health and safety in factories and all work sites subject to the provisions in the Factory Acts. The job title says “inspectors of standards” or “regulations”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: conducting structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But inspectors of standards and regulations is not one task. It is 273 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is conducting structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 19%
changing shape: 13%
staying human: 69%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
4 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

55 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Interpreting drawings, specifications, risk assessments, method statements and regulations to ensure compliance
This is reading one thing and writing another: drawings, specifications, risk assessments, method statements and regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Interpret drawings, specifications, risk assessments, method statements, and regulations to ensure compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading drawings, method statements and regulations against each other is desk work that software is now good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining work logs to record daily activities and progress
This is reading one thing and writing another: work logs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Maintain work logs to record daily activities and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Daily work logs are routine record keeping already handled by software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating construction costs to support bids for new work projects
This is reading one thing and writing another: construction costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Estimate construction costs to support bids for new work projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Construction cost estimates follow standard measurement and price data that software applies well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coding information on licence applications for computer entry
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 3581/06
Source: “Code information on licence applications for computer entry.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coding application details for entry into a system is routine data work that software does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

34 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Assessing project details to ensure adherence to environmental regulations
The software now makes the first pass at project details, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Assess project details to ensure adherence to environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Environmental rules and project documents are both text, so checking one against the other suits software well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating inspections and compliance activities with inspectorates and regulatory bodies
The software now makes the first pass at inspections, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Coordinate inspections and compliance activities with inspectorates and regulatory bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating inspection activity with other bodies is scheduling and correspondence, which software organises well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining permits, licences, applications and records to ensure compliance with licensing requirements
The software now makes the first pass at permits, licences, applications and records, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3581/04, 3581/06
Source: “Examine permits, licences, applications, and records to ensure compliance with licensing requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking permits and applications against requirements is document work, and the compliance decision sits with the authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

184 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Approving demolitions
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for demolitions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Approve demolitions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The assessment can be drafted, but approving a demolition is a formal decision only the council's authorised officer can make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards
This work happens in the physical world: project sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Inspect project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking that a site matches its specifications means standing on it, and the compliance judgement is made by the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures
This work happens in the physical world: structural inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Conduct structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Measuring a structure with survey instruments and tape is hands-on work at the building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 263 tasks

Keeping up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: to date in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Keep up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 100 out of 100 (96–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legislation and technical developments are published openly, and software is very good at tracking and summarising them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Collecting fees for driving licences to process applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: fees in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/03
Source: “Collect fees for driving licences to process applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Taking licence fees and processing applications is standard online payment handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing incident data to identify trends in injuries
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: incident data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Analyse incident data to identify trends in injuries, illnesses, accidents, or other hazards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding trends in incident data is statistical analysis software does faster and more consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records to track housing compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/05
Source: “Maintain records to track housing compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Housing compliance records are structured data that software keeps and tracks reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting fees for various licences to facilitate issuance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: fees in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/06
Source: “Collect fees for various licences to facilitate issuance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Taking payment for a licence is a routine transaction that online systems already handle.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording applicant data on specified forms to process licences
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: applicant data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/06
Source: “Record applicant data on specified forms to process licences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Entering applicant details on licence forms is routine data entry already largely automated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining office tracking systems for efficient correspondence and follow-up actions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: office tracking systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/06
Source: “Maintain office tracking systems for efficient correspondence and follow-up actions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking correspondence and follow-up actions is exactly what office software is designed to do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating equipment operating factors using standard formulae and conversion tables
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: equipment operating factors in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Calculate equipment operating factors using standard formulae and conversion tables.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Applying standard formulae and conversion tables to plant readings is straightforward calculation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/09
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records accurate is exactly what software is best at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying emissions testing procedures and standards appropriate for the age and technology of vehicles
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: emissions testing procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/10
Source: “Identify emissions testing procedures and standards appropriate for the age and technology of vehicles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (81–95 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The testing rules are published in detail, so matching the right procedure to a vehicle is straightforward for software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Comparing emissions findings with applicable emissions standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: emissions findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/10
Source: “Compare emissions findings with applicable emissions standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing measured emissions against published limits is a straightforward calculation that software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining knowledge of Health and Safety Executive
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: knowledge of health in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Maintain knowledge of Health and Safety Executive (HSE) legislation and developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping up with health and safety law is reading published material, which software tracks and summarises well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Staying informed about developments in specialist areas and land-based sectors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: informed in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 3581/04
Source: “Stay informed about developments in specialist areas and land-based sectors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping up with developments in a specialist sector is reading and summarising published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Staying informed about meat hygiene regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: informed in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 3581/07
Source: “Stay informed about meat hygiene regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Meat hygiene regulations are published in detail, so keeping current is reading and summarising.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing reports of activities involving impoundments and dispositions of animals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports of activities involving impoundments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/01
Source: “Write reports of activities involving impoundments and dispositions of animals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up impoundments and outcomes is straightforward record-keeping that software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing and reviewing reports on environmental inspections to ensure regulatory compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/01
Source: “Write and review reports on environmental inspections to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Inspection reports follow a fixed format filled from findings already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining inspection records to ensure building safety
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: inspection records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/02
Source: “Maintain inspection records to ensure building safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping inspection records complete and searchable is routine record management software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing correspondence to inform concerned parties of licensing decisions or appeals processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: correspondence in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/03
Source: “Prepare correspondence to inform concerned parties of licensing decisions or appeals processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standard letters about decisions and appeals are exactly the kind of correspondence software produces well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records to demonstrate compliance with health
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Maintain records to demonstrate compliance with health, safety, and environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compliance records are structured data, and software keeps them complete and current very reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports of investigation results to ensure workplace safety compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports of investigation results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Prepare reports of investigation results to ensure workplace safety compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investigation reports follow a fixed structure filled from evidence already gathered.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining logbooks recording inspection and maintenance activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: logbooks recording inspection in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Maintain logbooks recording inspection and maintenance activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping inspection and maintenance logbooks is straightforward record-keeping that software handles reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing specifications or orders for purchasing safety equipment to ensure conformity to health and safety standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Prepare specifications or orders for purchasing safety equipment to ensure conformity to health and safety standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Equipment specifications and purchase orders follow standard formats and published safety standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Completing detailed paperwork related to these reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed paperwork in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Complete detailed paperwork related to these reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The paperwork behind a report is routine form filling from information already collected.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing reports of findings and recommendations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports of findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/07
Source: “Write reports of findings and recommendations for farmers, growers, or processors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Findings reports for farmers and processors follow a standard format filled from inspection data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports describing contamination tests
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports describing contamination tests in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Prepare reports describing contamination tests, decontaminated materials or equipment, and decontamination methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Contamination test reports follow a fixed format filled from readings already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of radiological and environmental conditions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of radiological in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Maintain records of radiological and environmental conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping monitoring records is exactly what software does well, once the readings exist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining driver and equipment records for compliance with regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: driver in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/10
Source: “Examine driver and equipment records for compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking driver and equipment records against the rules is structured data comparison.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining carrier operating rules and employee qualification guidelines for compliance with regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: carrier operating rules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/10
Source: “Examine carrier operating rules and employee qualification guidelines for compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing operator rules and driver qualification records against regulations is document checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying strategies to reduce costs without compromising quality in building projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: strategies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/02
Source: “Identify strategies to reduce costs without compromising quality in building projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost-saving options in construction are well documented and easy to model from project figures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the maintenance, filing, safekeeping or computerisation of municipal documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the maintenance, filing in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3581/06
Source: “Direct the maintenance, filing, safekeeping, or computerisation of municipal documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This is records management: software already organises, files and secures documents at least as well as a person directing the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying areas for operational or processing improvement
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: areas in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 3581/07
Source: “Identify areas for operational or process improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting where a process could work better is analysis of available information, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing commercial vehicle logs and shipping documents to detect problems or ensure regulatory compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: commercial vehicle logs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/10
Source: “Review commercial vehicle logs and shipping documents to detect problems or ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Driver-hours and shipping records are digital and the rules are published, so software can spot problems reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Comparing product recipes with government-approved formulas or recipes to determine acceptability
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: product recipes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3581/07
Source: “Compare product recipes with government-approved formulas or recipes to determine acceptability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Comparing a recipe against an approved formula is a straightforward document check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping records documenting animal health
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records documenting animal health in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3581/07
Source: “Keep records documenting animal health, diet, or behaviour.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Record-keeping itself is easily automated, though someone has to observe the animal to know what to record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing supervisors when individual exposures approach maximum allowable limits
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: supervisors in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Inform supervisors when individual exposures approach maximum allowable limits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dose monitoring against limits is automatic threshold checking that systems already do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing inspection reports to document findings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: inspection reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 3581/02
Source: “Write inspection reports to document findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once the findings exist, writing them into an inspection report is drafting work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing comprehensive internal health and safety policies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: comprehensive internal health in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 3581/04
Source: “Develop comprehensive internal health and safety policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Safety policies are written documents built on published guidance, which software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing methods to predict possible hazards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Develop methods to predict possible hazards using experience, historical data, and other information sources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Predicting hazards from historical incident data is pattern work that software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining emergency response plans and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: emergency response plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Maintain emergency response plans and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Emergency plans and procedures are documents, and software drafts and keeps them up to date well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding to requests for information from the public
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: requests in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/06
Source: “Respond to requests for information from the public, other local authorities, state officials, or state and federal legislative offices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering information requests from the public and officials is correspondence work that software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing who may be at risk and estimate the risk magnitude using technical knowledge and data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Assess who may be at risk and estimate the risk magnitude using technical knowledge and data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out who is at risk and how badly is analysis on available data, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing actions like lockouts and tagouts for safe equipment repair
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: actions like lockouts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Develop actions like lockouts and tagouts for safe equipment repair.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Lockout and tagout procedures follow well-documented patterns software drafts accurately for a given machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing information to identify risks to the public
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/09
Source: “Analyse information to identify risks to the public, colleagues, and other agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling information together to work out who is at risk is analysis and writing, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing reports and keeping records on legal consultations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/09
Source: “Write reports and keep records on legal consultations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up consultations and keeping the records is drafting work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending corrective actions to address specific issues in compliance and operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: corrective actions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/10
Source: “Recommend corrective actions to address specific issues in compliance and operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommending corrective action is written advice; the formal enforcement decision that may follow is a separate step.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering enquiries from the public concerning animal control operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: enquiries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 3581/01
Source: “Answer enquiries from the public concerning animal control operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering public questions about animal control is routine information work that software handles quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Questioning applicants to obtain required information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: applicants in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 3581/06
Source: “Question applicants to obtain required information such as name, address, or age.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Collecting names, addresses and ages is routine information gathering that online forms already do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending and implementing performance improvements in quality assurance processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: performance improvements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 3581/07
Source: “Recommend and implement performance improvements in quality assurance processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing quality processes and proposing improvements is analysis and writing, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to the production and implementation of service plans against targets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the production in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 3581/09
Source: “Contribute to the production and implementation of service plans against targets, performance indicators and budgets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Service plans against targets and budgets follow a standard structure filled from data already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Giving legal advice to members of the public about their consumer rights
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal advice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 3581/09
Source: “Give legal advice to members of the public about their consumer rights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (54–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Consumer rights law is published and well explained, so answering public questions is largely a look-up task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Handling enquiries related to consumer protection and trading standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: enquiries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 3581/09
Source: “Handle enquiries related to consumer protection and trading standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (54–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Consumer and trading standards enquiries mostly have published answers, so handling them is largely look-up work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating safe radiation exposure times for staff using plant contamination readings and prescribed safe levels of radiation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at safe radiation exposure times, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Calculate safe radiation exposure times for staff using plant contamination readings and prescribed safe levels of radiation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The exposure calculation is arithmetic from readings, though radiation safety decisions rest with a legally appointed adviser.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing licence holders about regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at licence holders, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3581/03, 3581/06
Source: “Inform licence holders about regulations related to licensing, permits, and passports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Explaining licensing rules is answering questions from published material, which software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting law or regulation violations to appropriate boards or agencies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at law, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 3581/03
Source: “Report law or regulation violations to appropriate boards or agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The referral itself is a written document, but it carries weight because it comes from the warranted officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring regulatory rules or changes are communicated through company policies and procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory rules, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 3581/03
Source: “Ensure regulatory rules or changes are communicated through company policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning new rules into written policies and procedures is drafting work that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on health and safety policies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at health, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 3581/04
Source: “Advise on health and safety policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advice on health and safety policy is written work, well covered by published guidance that software can draw on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on public health to stakeholders
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Provide advice on public health to stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Public health advice draws on well-published guidance that software can turn into clear, usable material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using expert knowledge to create reports with instructions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at expert knowledge, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Use expert knowledge to create reports with instructions, recommendations, and advice on legal and good practice standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The report is drafting work, but the instructions carry weight because a qualified officer stands behind them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing maintenance or testing requirements for radiation protection equipment to ensure compliance with legislative and manufacturer's requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at maintenance, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Review maintenance or testing requirements for radiation protection equipment to ensure compliance with legislative and manufacturer's requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking maintenance and testing paperwork against the rules is desk work, though a certificated radiation adviser signs off the judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing the organisation's activities and presenting findings to relevant authorities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the organisation's activities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 3581/09
Source: “Review the organisation's activities and present findings to relevant authorities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing activity and writing it up for authorities is standard reporting from records already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating and making recommendations on carrier requests for exemption from national standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at recommendations, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 3581/10
Source: “Investigate and make recommendations on carrier requests for exemption from national standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Exemption cases follow published criteria, though the recommendation carries an official's professional responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Handling personal, confidential and sensitive information with strict adherence to legal and organisational confidentiality policies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at personal, confidential and sensitive information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 3581/09
Source: “Handle personal, confidential, and sensitive information with strict adherence to legal and organisational confidentiality policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Systems can enforce confidentiality rules, but the responsibility for handling sensitive information sits with the person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and recommending specific safety measures against hazardous work methods and materials
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific safety measures against hazardous work methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 3581/04
Source: “Identify and recommend specific safety measures against hazardous work methods and materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Published guidance covers most hazards, so software can suggest sound control measures for the officer to weigh up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing and managing cleaning and hygiene programs and monitoring data
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at hygiene programs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 3581/04
Source: “Establish and manage cleaning and hygiene programs and monitor data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Programme design and data monitoring are largely desk work that software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Checking that advertisements and labels accurately describe the properties of the products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advertisements, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Check that advertisements and labels accurately describe the properties of the products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing what a label claims with what the rules allow is checking work that software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing auditing and critical appraisal of business procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at critical appraisal of business procedures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3581/09
Source: “Manage auditing and critical appraisal of business procedures, processes, and products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Auditing business procedures against documented standards is largely a paperwork comparison.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring output from Thermal Imaging Units
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at output, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 3581/10
Source: “Monitor output from Thermal Imaging Units (TIU) to identify high-risk commercial motor vehicles for inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Thermal imaging output is data, so flagging high-risk vehicles from it is a screening task software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on food safety systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at food safety systems, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 3581/07
Source: “Advise on food safety systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Food safety systems follow published standards, though the advice carries the name of a qualified officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on legal procedures and related issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3581/09
Source: “Provide advice on legal procedures and related issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Procedural advice is well documented, though it carries weight because a qualified officer gives it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice based on the outcomes of surveys and inspections
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3581/09
Source: “Provide advice based on the outcomes of surveys and inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The advice is written from survey findings, and it carries weight because a qualified officer stands behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing professional licences to individuals who meet specific regulatory standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at professional licences, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3581/03
Source: “Issue professional licences to individuals who meet specific regulatory standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The eligibility check is rule-following, but issuing a licence is a formal act of an authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with legislation on recording and keeping radiation dose information
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at compliance, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3581/08
Source: “Ensure compliance with legislation on recording and keeping radiation dose information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dose records are structured data, but British rules require an approved dosimetry service to hold and certify them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing radiation protection documentation to manage radiation safety
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at radiation protection documentation, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Produce radiation protection documentation to manage radiation safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Radiation safety documents are drafted work, but British rules require a certificated adviser behind local rules and assessments.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying judgement and technical expertise to support the resolution of issues and enable decision making
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at judgement, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 3581/09
Source: “Apply judgement and technical expertise to support the resolution of issues and enable decision making.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysis and options come easily, but the judgement call in a difficult case is the officer's to make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating new methods of transporting hazardous materials to ensure public safety
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new methods of transporting hazardous materials, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3581/10
Source: “Evaluate new methods of transporting hazardous materials to ensure public safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Published research helps, but approving a new way of moving dangerous goods rests with a qualified regulator.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining animal licences
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at animal licences, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3581/01
Source: “Examine animal licences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking a licence document is simple verification work, usually done on the premises by the authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating 'right-to-know' programmes regarding hazardous chemicals
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at 'right-to-know' programmes regarding hazardous chemicals, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Coordinate 'right-to-know' programmes regarding hazardous chemicals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Chemical information programmes are mostly paperwork and briefing material, which software drafts well, though an inspector still stands behind the content.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining inventories of hazardous materials or wastes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at inventories of hazardous materials, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Maintain inventories of hazardous materials or wastes, ensuring proper handling with waste tracking systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Inventories and tracking are natural software tasks, though waste transfer paperwork must be signed by someone legally accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on equipment or product evaluation for meat hygiene inspections
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at equipment, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 3581/07
Source: “Advise on equipment or product evaluation for meat hygiene inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Equipment comparisons are documentary, though the recommendation comes from an officer who knows the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on factory construction or layout for meat processing facilities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at factory construction, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 3581/07
Source: “Advise on factory construction or layout for meat processing facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Layout guidance follows published hygiene standards, so first-pass advice is largely a documentary exercise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Enquiring about pesticides or chemicals to which animals
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at pesticides, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 3581/07
Source: “Enquire about pesticides or chemicals to which animals may have been exposed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Asking about chemical exposure is a structured set of questions whose answers are recorded and checked easily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating effectively with team members
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at team members, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 3581/07
Source: “Communicate effectively with team members, updating on progress and coordinating work activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can prepare updates, but coordinating work with colleagues is a live conversation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing demolition permits
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for demolition permits, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Issue demolition permits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The permit document is easy to produce, but only the council's authorised officer can actually grant it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing licences, permits or other official documentation
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for licences, permits or other official documentation, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 3581/06
Source: “Issue licences, permits, or other official documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A licence or permit is only valid when granted by the authorised officer, even though the paperwork itself is easy to produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting investigation results to certify vehicle compliance with safety standards
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for investigation results, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 3581/10
Source: “Document investigation results to certify vehicle compliance with safety standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The paperwork is easy to produce, but only an authorised examiner can certify that a vehicle meets safety standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to problem solving and continuous improvement in abattoir operations
staying human
The ratings behind this row put problem well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 3581/07
Source: “Contribute to problem solving and continuous improvement in abattoir operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Improvement ideas can be generated, but the useful ones come from people who see the line running every day.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Acting as a subject matter expert in radiation protection to support training development or delivery
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a subject matter expert, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/08
Source: “Act as a subject matter expert in radiation protection to support training development or delivery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy to produce, but the expert input still comes from someone with recognised radiation credentials.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining when legal action, such as notices or prosecution
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for when legal action, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Determine when legal action, such as notices or prosecution, is necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Case papers can be summarised, but deciding to serve a notice or prosecute is an authorised officer's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting standards for the production of meat or poultry products and for food ingredients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for standards, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 3581/07
Source: “Set standards for the production of meat or poultry products and for food ingredients, additives, or compounds.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Setting production standards is written policy work, but it is a regulator's decision that a qualified official must own.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining the requirements of a workplace-monitoring programme for radiation
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the requirements of a workplace-monitoring programme, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Determine the requirements of a workplace-monitoring programme for radiation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Designing a monitoring programme is a written decision, but British rules require a certificated radiation adviser to be consulted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using expertise in trading standards legislation and investigative practice to make legal and tactical decisions for investigations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for expertise, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/09
Source: “Use expertise in trading standards legislation and investigative practice to make legal and tactical decisions for investigations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Legislation is published, but the tactical decisions in an investigation are reserved to a qualified officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing official grading certificates for products
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for official grading certificates, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 3581/07
Source: “Issue official grading certificates for products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The grading decision follows published criteria, but the certificate is issued under an officer's official authority.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing support to enhance productivity and growth for the organisation and its business partners
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles support and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 3581/09
Source: “Provide support to enhance productivity and growth for the organisation and its business partners.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guidance is easy to produce, but practical support to partners depends on knowing their situation and being trusted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Advising pet owners on animal health care and nutrition
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles pet owners and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 3581/01
Source: “Advise pet owners on animal health care and nutrition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: General care and feeding advice is well documented, though owners usually want to hear it from a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing business advice to ensure traders comply with legislation
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles business advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Provide business advice to ensure traders comply with legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The legislation is published, so tailored compliance guidance is largely a research and drafting job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sending samples to laboratories for analysis to verify meat safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/07
Source: “Send samples to laboratories for analysis to verify meat safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sample paperwork and tracking are easy to automate, but the sample has to be taken and packed by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging veterinary treatment for rescued animals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: veterinary treatment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/01
Source: “Arrange veterinary treatment for rescued animals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Finding a vet and booking treatment is straightforward coordination, but getting the animal there is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contacting police to report violations and request arrests for animal-related offences
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for police, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 3581/01
Source: “Contact police to report violations and request arrests for animal-related offences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reporting an offence is a short piece of writing, but the referral has to come from an accountable officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Applying a range of analytical and problem-solving techniques to resolve environmental health issues
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a range of analytical, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Apply a range of analytical and problem-solving techniques to resolve environmental health issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Analysis is a strength, but resolving an environmental health problem depends on local circumstances the officer sees.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring transport and handling comply with regulations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for transport, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/07
Source: “Ensure transport and handling comply with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Transport rules are published, but checking that goods are actually handled correctly means eyes on the operation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recognizing and evaluating the effectiveness of risk and safety leadership behaviours
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the effectiveness of risk well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Recognize and evaluate the effectiveness of risk and safety leadership behaviours.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging safety leadership means watching how people behave, though the frameworks for assessing it are well documented.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conferring with officials and specialists to obtain information relevant to licensing decisions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles officials and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 3581/03
Source: “Confer with officials and specialists to obtain information relevant to licensing decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Records can be requested automatically, but the useful detail often comes from talking to the right specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in making strategic decisions for trading standards services
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles making strategic decisions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 3581/09
Source: “Participate in making strategic decisions for trading standards services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Options papers draft well, but strategic decisions for a service are made by the people accountable for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Explaining regulations and recommending remedial actions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for regulations, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Explain regulations and recommend remedial actions to owners, offenders, or authorities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The regulations and remedies are easy to set out, but delivering them to an offender is a conversation with consequences.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing training to building inspectors
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for building inspectors, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 3581/02
Source: “Provide training to building inspectors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy to produce, but teaching inspectors depends on an experienced person working alongside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Briefing workers on radiation levels in work areas
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for workers, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Brief workers on radiation levels in work areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The briefing content is easy to produce, but workers are told in person and the figures come from a qualified adviser.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Giving talks on legal topics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: talks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/09
Source: “Give talks on legal topics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The talk is easy to write from published law, but delivering it to an audience is done in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Administering written tests to licence applicants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: written tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/03
Source: “Administer written tests to licence applicants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Written licence tests are already delivered and marked on screen, though the test centre itself is staffed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying the authenticity of documents
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the authenticity of documents, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 3581/06
Source: “Verify the authenticity of documents, such as foreign identification or immigration documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Document checks use tools, but the final call on whether an identity document is genuine rests with the trained officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting data and writing reports on meat safety inspections
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/07
Source: “Collect data and write reports on meat safety inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Report writing is straightforward, but the inspection data behind it is gathered on the slaughter line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating control or protection measures to reduce radiation risks using engineering and administrative controls
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for control, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Evaluate control or protection measures to reduce radiation risks using engineering and administrative controls.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Much of this is desk analysis, but British rules mean a certificated radiation protection adviser must be involved in the judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying instances of non-compliance with environmental health legislation and determining the most appropriate action
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for instances of non-compliance, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Identify instances of non-compliance with environmental health legislation and determine the most appropriate action.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Breaches can be flagged from records, but the enforcement route is a decision the law reserves to the officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing radiation exposures using detailed knowledge of equipment and techniques
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for radiation exposures, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Assess radiation exposures using detailed knowledge of equipment and techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dose assessment follows established methods, but British rules put approved dosimetry services and certificated advisers behind the numbers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with legislative requirements for the accountancy and disposal of radioactive materials
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for compliance, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Ensure compliance with legislative requirements for the accountancy and disposal of radioactive materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Radioactive material accounting is paperwork, but British rules require a certificated adviser and a permit holder behind the decisions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining arrangements for using radiation generators and radioactive materials in the workplace
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for arrangements, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Determine arrangements for using radiation generators and radioactive materials in the workplace, including storage and movement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Storage and movement arrangements are written decisions, but British rules require a certificated radiation protection adviser to be consulted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading projects from start to end to enforce compliance with regulations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for projects, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/09
Source: “Lead projects from start to end to enforce compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Project plans and case data are easy to manage, but enforcement decisions rest with the authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering presentations to lay or professional audiences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: presentations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/01
Source: “Deliver presentations to lay or professional audiences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides and scripts are easy to produce, but the presentation is delivered to a live audience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Facilitating consumer relations to ensure compliance with trading standards
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles consumer relations and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Facilitate consumer relations to ensure compliance with trading standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Standard information is easy to provide, but consumer relations work depends on people trusting the service.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring environmental impact of development activities and pollution
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental impact of development activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Monitor environmental impact of development activities and pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sensor and survey data can be analysed automatically, but confirming what is happening on the ground needs visits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing fixed penalty notices for specific offences as per local regulations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for fixed penalty notices, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/01
Source: “Issue fixed penalty notices for specific offences as per local regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (20–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Filling in the ticket is trivial, but only an officer authorised under the local rules can lawfully issue one.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering suspension of activities that pose threats to workers' health or safety
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for suspension of activities, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Order suspension of activities that pose threats to workers' health or safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (20–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Stopping work is a prohibition notice, which by law only an appointed inspector can serve, however easy the form is to fill in.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing authoritative advice on the implementation of radiation control measures
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for authoritative advice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Provide authoritative advice on the implementation of radiation control measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (20–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Under British radiation rules this advice may only be given by someone holding recognised certification as a radiation protection adviser.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing notices for vehicle infractions or safety problems
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for notices, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/10
Source: “Issue notices for vehicle infractions or safety problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (20–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The notice itself is a simple form, but only an authorised examiner can lawfully issue it at the roadside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting training programmes to ensure compliance with safety regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: programmes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct training programmes to ensure compliance with safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Course material is easy to produce, but safety training works through someone in the room answering real questions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling evidence for legal investigations and court proceedings
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for evidence, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/04, 3581/09
Source: “Compile evidence for legal investigations and court proceedings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Documents can be assembled automatically, but evidence has to be handled by the authorised officer for a court to accept it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing training to employers and new or trainee employees
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: employers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Provide training to employers and new or trainee employees.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The material is easy to write, but training employers and new starters happens face to face on their premises.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting and enforcing government acts and regulations for agricultural workers
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for government acts, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 3581/07
Source: “Interpret and enforce government acts and regulations for agricultural workers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The rules are published, but enforcing them against a farm business is an authorised officer's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining required standards to agricultural workers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: required standards, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/07
Source: “Explain required standards to agricultural workers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The standards are easy to explain in writing, but agricultural workers are told them on the farm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing radiation risks in the workplace
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for radiation risks, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/08
Source: “Assess radiation risks in the workplace.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The assessment follows a set method, but British radiation rules require a certificated adviser to be consulted on it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with others to apply technical and practical knowledge for problem-solving in incidents involving multiple factors
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Collaborate with others to apply technical and practical knowledge for problem-solving in incidents involving multiple factors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can supply the technical knowledge, but working a messy incident through with colleagues happens in live discussion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Addressing issues with traders selling faulty goods
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for issues, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Address issues with traders selling faulty goods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The legal position is easy to set out, but tackling a trader about faulty goods is done in conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying modifications to vehicle systems to assess their impact on MOT testing procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: modifications, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 3581/10
Source: “Identify modifications to vehicle systems to assess their impact on MOT testing procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recognising modifications needs a look at the vehicle, though the testing rules are published in full and easy to apply.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with pet owners to understand their concerns
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles pet owners and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 3581/01
Source: “Communicate with pet owners to understand their concerns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding what an owner is really worried about depends on a live conversation with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing safe systems of work to protect the health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: safe systems of work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Implement safe systems of work to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all stakeholders during hygiene activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The written safe system is easy to produce; making people actually work to it happens on the floor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing for prosecutions related to animal welfare
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for prosecutions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 3581/01
Source: “Prepare for prosecutions related to animal welfare.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A case file is assembled from documents, but it has to be built and stood behind by the authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting public seminars on animal welfare
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: public seminars, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/01
Source: “Conduct public seminars on animal welfare.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The talk can be written automatically, but a seminar is delivered to a room of people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting site safety inductions as part of safety and security activities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site safety inductions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct site safety inductions as part of safety and security activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The content can be prepared automatically, but the induction is delivered in person to people arriving on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Finding homes for stray or unwanted animals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: homes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/01
Source: “Find homes for stray or unwanted animals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Matching animals to homes can be organised digitally, but home checks and handovers happen in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating accidents and complaints to determine if there has been a breach of health and safety law
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accidents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/04
Source: “Investigate accidents and complaints to determine if there has been a breach of health and safety law.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Records and statements can be analysed, but accident investigation means visiting the site and interviewing people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring staff grading to ensure conformance to standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/07
Source: “Monitor staff grading to ensure conformance to standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Grading data can be tracked, but checking that staff grade correctly means watching them on the line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the collection and testing of samples to determine radioactivity levels or ensure radioactive containment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the collection, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Direct the collection and testing of samples to determine radioactivity levels or ensure radioactive containment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Sampling programmes can be planned on paper, but radioactivity testing is directed on site under legal appointment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring personnel for radiation exposure levels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: personnel, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Monitor personnel for radiation exposure levels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dose monitoring means issuing and reading badges on site, and British rules require an approved dosimetry service.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Controlling and monitoring a process or plant and equipment efficiently and securely
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a process, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Control and monitor a process or plant and equipment efficiently and securely, resolving problems and abnormal conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Plant is run from a control room, but resolving abnormal conditions rests on the qualified operator on shift.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading inspections and investigations to assess consumer protection and compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/09
Source: “Lead inspections and investigations to assess consumer protection and compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Case analysis is strong, but leading an investigation means visiting traders and interviewing people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with architects to develop detailed designs for construction projects
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for architects, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 3581/02
Source: “Collaborate with architects to develop detailed designs for construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Detailed design is original professional work that a registered architect or engineer has to stand behind.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Instituting control measures for hazardous conditions with engineers or doctors
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for control measures, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Institute control measures for hazardous conditions with engineers or doctors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Putting controls in place means acting on site, and when an inspector requires them the instruction carries legal force.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting safety audits, including radiation work, by inspecting facilities and reviewing documentation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: safety audits, including radiation work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/08
Source: “Conduct safety audits, including radiation work, by inspecting facilities and reviewing documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: An audit is half document review and half walking the site, and radiation work needs a certificated adviser involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing the implementation of decontamination procedures based on equipment and contamination size
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the implementation of decontamination procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Direct the implementation of decontamination procedures based on equipment and contamination size, nature, and type.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Procedures are documented, but directing a decontamination is done on site by a legally appointed person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Giving talks to schools, businesses and various groups, including vulnerable adults
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: talks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/09
Source: “Give talks to schools, businesses, and various groups, including vulnerable adults.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A talk can be written automatically, but delivering it to a room, especially to vulnerable adults, depends on the person there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Cooperating with local emergency services
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: local emergency services, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/01
Source: “Cooperate with local emergency services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working alongside emergency services happens at the scene and depends on live cooperation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Applying advanced knowledge to address complex radiation protection problems
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for advanced knowledge, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 3581/08
Source: “Apply advanced knowledge to address complex radiation protection problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Complex radiation problems need original expert judgement, and only a certificated radiation protection adviser may give the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting educational workshops on sex and health education to promote healthy living
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: educational workshops, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct educational workshops on sex and health education to promote healthy living.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Materials can be prepared automatically, but a workshop on sensitive health topics depends on trust built in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Warning persons of rule infractions or violations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: persons of rule infractions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/03
Source: “Warn persons of rule infractions or violations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (1–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The warning is given face to face on site, and it carries weight because it comes from the warranted officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating irregularities and non-compliance issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: irregularities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/03
Source: “Investigate irregularities and non-compliance issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Irregularities are chased through records and site visits, and formal investigation powers belong to the warranted officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating accidents to identify causes and prevent future occurrences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accidents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/04, 3581/08
Source: “Investigate accidents to identify causes and prevent future occurrences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Evidence has to be gathered on site, and a formal accident investigation is carried out by an inspector holding statutory powers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and investigating complaints relating to environmental health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: complaints, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Identify and investigate complaints relating to environmental health.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Complaints are investigated by visiting and questioning, using powers of entry that belong only to an authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Establishing and undertaking Health Surveillance and Health Screening programmes in the workplace
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health surveillance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Establish and undertake Health Surveillance and Health Screening programmes in the workplace.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Health surveillance is clinical work: British rules require an appointed doctor or qualified occupational health nurse, whoever arranges the programme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating safety-related incidents
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: safety-related incidents, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/10
Source: “Investigate safety-related incidents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Evidence is gathered at the scene, and a formal safety investigation is carried out by an officer holding statutory powers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing animal care procedures to ensure health and welfare standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animal care procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/01
Source: “Oversee animal care procedures to ensure health and welfare standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Overseeing animal care means watching procedures as they happen, and welfare standards are enforced by the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Eliminating conflicts between safety considerations and production by negotiating with managers and operators
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles conflicts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Eliminate conflicts between safety considerations and production by negotiating with managers and operators.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reconciling safety and production means persuading managers and operators face to face, with real money at stake.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adhering to health and safety requirements in the workplace
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Adhere to health and safety requirements in the workplace.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The work here is a person actually meeting safety requirements while doing their job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting weighing scales and food labels in shops to ensure accuracy and compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: scales, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Inspect weighing scales and food labels in shops to ensure accuracy and compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Label checks are documentary, but testing shop scales means putting weights on them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing and maintaining connections with businesses and community leaders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles connections and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 3581/09
Source: “Establish and maintain connections with businesses and community leaders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contact lists are easy to keep, but useful relationships with businesses and community leaders are built person to person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Collecting data on ecological or human health risks at brownfield sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Collect data on ecological or human health risks at brownfield sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Brownfield risk data has to be collected on the ground before anyone can analyse it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Minimizing hazards and risks in the workplace through the application of safe working practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hazards, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 3581/07
Source: “Minimize hazards and risks in the workplace through the application of safe working practices, including the use of personal protective equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Safe working practice is written down, but applying it, including wearing the kit, is something people do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Enforcing health legislation to promote public health and understanding of health protection procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health legislation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Enforce health legislation to promote public health and understanding of health protection procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Enforcement means visiting premises and using legal powers that belong only to a warranted officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing work areas for maintenance activities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Prepare work areas for maintenance activities, ensuring safety and efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making an area ready for maintenance means physically isolating, barriering and checking the space.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating equipment failures to diagnose faulty operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment failures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/10
Source: “Investigate equipment failures to diagnose faulty operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing why equipment failed usually means examining the equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting animal welfare conditions to ensure they meet regulatory standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animal welfare conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/01, 3581/07
Source: “Inspect animal welfare conditions to ensure they meet regulatory standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether animals are properly kept means seeing, hearing and smelling the conditions in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting animal housing facilities to determine their cleanliness and adequacy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animal housing facilities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/01
Source: “Inspect animal housing facilities to determine their cleanliness and adequacy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether animal housing is clean and adequate means being there and looking, and the licensing check is made by an authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting safety inspections on equipment and facilities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: safety inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Conduct safety inspections on equipment and facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A safety inspection means examining the equipment in place, with the finding resting on the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing premises for cleanliness, such as proper rubbish disposal or lack of vermin infestation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: premises, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Assess premises for cleanliness, such as proper rubbish disposal or lack of vermin infestation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether premises are clean and free of vermin means going in and looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting industrial or municipal facilities to evaluate operational effectiveness and ensure environmental regulation compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: industrial, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Inspect industrial or municipal facilities to evaluate operational effectiveness and ensure environmental regulation compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Evaluating a working facility means being inside it, and the compliance finding is made by the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting routine or unplanned visits and inspections for health and safety compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: routine or unplanned visits and inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct routine or unplanned visits and inspections for health and safety compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A health and safety inspection means walking the workplace and seeing what is actually happening.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site audits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct site audits to ensure adherence to safety and environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: An audit means walking the site, and the compliance finding is made by the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting premises, machinery or safety equipment to identify potential hazards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: premises, machinery or safety equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/04
Source: “Inspect premises, machinery, or safety equipment to identify potential hazards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting hazards in premises or machinery means being there and looking at them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting materials, stock, vehicles, equipment or facilities to ensure safety and freedom from defects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: materials, stock, vehicles, equipment or facilities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Inspect materials, stock, vehicles, equipment, or facilities to ensure safety and freedom from defects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting defects means physically examining the items, and the safety finding is made by the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating the adequacy of ventilation and lighting for employee health and comfort
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the adequacy of ventilation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Investigate the adequacy of ventilation and lighting for employee health and comfort.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging ventilation and lighting means taking readings in the actual room, with the formal finding made by the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting evidence or information at court cases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: evidence, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Present evidence or information at court cases as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Only a person can be sworn in and questioned in court about what they found.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting agricultural commodities or related operations for compliance with health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: agricultural commodities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/07
Source: “Inspect agricultural commodities or related operations for compliance with health, quality, and safety laws.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking commodities and operations against the law means going to the farm or store and looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting meat transportation conditions to ensure compliance with health standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: meat transportation conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/07
Source: “Inspect meat transportation conditions to ensure compliance with health standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking how meat is transported means opening the vehicle and looking at the load.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and responding to abnormal or emergency situations according to established procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: abnormal, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Identify and respond to abnormal or emergency situations according to established procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Recognising and reacting to an emergency happens where it occurs, not at a screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing workers to vacate hazardous areas
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Direct workers to vacate hazardous areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The instruction is simple, but clearing people out of a hazardous area happens with someone there directing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying hazards or maintenance needs in nuclear reactor equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hazards, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Identify hazards or maintenance needs in nuclear reactor equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting hazards in reactor equipment means being at the plant, with the assessment resting on the appointed inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out routine checks at trading premises like pubs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: routine checks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/09
Source: “Carry out routine checks at trading premises like pubs, petrol stations, and shops.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Routine checks at a pub, garage or shop mean visiting the premises.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying potential hazards, including unsafe electrical goods and unroadworthy vehicles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: potential hazards, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/09
Source: “Identify potential hazards, including unsafe electrical goods and unroadworthy vehicles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting an unsafe appliance or an unroadworthy vehicle means examining it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting visual inspections of emission control equipment and smoke emitted from petrol or diesel vehicles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: visual inspections of emission control equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/10
Source: “Conduct visual inspections of emission control equipment and smoke emitted from petrol or diesel vehicles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Watching the exhaust of a particular vehicle can only be done by someone standing next to it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting automotive and mechanical equipment to assess condition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: automotive, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/10
Source: “Inspect automotive and mechanical equipment to assess condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assessing the condition of machinery means examining it in person, with the verdict resting on the authorised inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out remote inspections of motor vehicles using handheld controllers and remotely operated vehicle inspection devices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: remote inspections of motor vehicles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/10
Source: “Carry out remote inspections of motor vehicles using handheld controllers and remotely operated vehicle inspection devices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Even a remotely operated inspection device needs someone on the spot driving it, and the verdict is the authorised examiner's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting repairs to transport vehicles or equipment to ensure that repair work was performed properly
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: repairs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/10
Source: “Inspect repairs to transport vehicles or equipment to ensure that repair work was performed properly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking that a repair was done properly means looking at the vehicle, with the verdict resting on the authorised examiner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting site inspections to ensure compliance with building regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/02
Source: “Conduct site inspections to ensure compliance with building regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Building control inspections are carried out on site by a registered inspector looking at the actual work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting environmental hazard inspections to identify or quantify problems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental hazard inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Conduct environmental hazard inspections to identify or quantify problems, such as asbestos, poor air quality, water contamination, or other environmental hazards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Finding asbestos or contamination means being on site, samples go to an accredited laboratory, and the formal finding is the inspector's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting wiring, plumbing, electrical circuits, sewers, heating systems and foundations for safety and coding compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrical circuits, sewers, heating systems and foundations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Inspect wiring, plumbing, electrical circuits, sewers, heating systems, and foundations for safety and code compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Wiring, pipework and foundations must be seen on site, and gas and electrical sign-off is restricted to registered people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Observing equipment operation and controlling to rate ability of applicants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment operation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/03
Source: “Observe equipment operation and control to rate ability of applicants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether an applicant can safely operate equipment means watching them do it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Evaluating individuals' home or work environments to identify potential health or safety issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: individuals' home, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Evaluate individuals' home or work environments to identify potential health or safety issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging someone's home or workplace means visiting it, and the formal finding is made by the authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting sanitary conditions at public facilities for health compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sanitary conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Inspect sanitary conditions at public facilities for health compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging sanitary conditions needs a person on the premises, and only an authorised council officer can make the formal health-compliance finding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting abattoirs and processing plants to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: abattoirs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/07
Source: “Inspect abattoirs and processing plants to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Abattoir inspection is carried out on the line by an officially designated inspector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting food products and processing procedures to determine whether products are safe to eat
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: food products, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/07
Source: “Inspect food products and processing procedures to determine whether products are safe to eat.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether food is safe means inspecting it in place, and the decision belongs to an authorised food officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Taking emergency actions if product safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: emergency actions if product safety, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/07
Source: “Take emergency actions if product safety is compromised.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Stopping a line or seizing product is an urgent decision taken on site under official authority.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Examining commodities like poultry and seafood to certify their qualities and grades
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: commodities like poultry, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/07
Source: “Examine commodities like poultry and seafood to certify their qualities and grades.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Grading poultry and seafood means handling and examining the product under official authority.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Following policies and procedures for radiation workers to ensure personnel safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: policies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 3581/08
Source: “Follow policies and procedures for radiation workers to ensure personnel safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The work here is a person actually following the rules while doing the job in a radiation area.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding appropriately to changes in radiological conditions using the ALARP principles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: changes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 3581/08
Source: “Respond appropriately to changes in radiological conditions using the ALARP principles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reacting to changing radiological conditions happens on the spot, and the response rests on qualified radiation staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating suspected offences, sometimes undercover and with the police or other agencies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: suspected offences, sometimes undercover, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/09
Source: “Investigate suspected offences, sometimes undercover and with the police or other agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Investigating suspected offences, sometimes undercover, means people out in the field gathering evidence.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Responding to complaints at trading premises
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: complaints, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/09
Source: “Respond to complaints at trading premises such as factories and markets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Responding to a complaint at a factory or market means going there to see the problem.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting vehicles or equipment to ensure compliance with rules
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: vehicles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/10
Source: “Inspect vehicles or equipment to ensure compliance with rules, standards, or regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Inspecting a vehicle means going over it physically, and only an authorised examiner can pass or fail it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Surveying unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/02
Source: “Survey unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Surveying a dangerous building means going to it, and only the council's authorised officer can approve a demolition.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Following nuclear equipment operational policies and procedures that ensure environmental safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: nuclear equipment operational policies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Follow nuclear equipment operational policies and procedures that ensure environmental safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The work here is a person actually following operating procedures at the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Challenging unsafe behaviours and conditions in the workplace to reinforce health & safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unsafe behaviours, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Challenge unsafe behaviours and conditions in the workplace to reinforce health & safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Challenging someone about unsafe behaviour happens face to face on site, and how it is handled decides whether anything changes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Interviewing potential offenders for breaches of regulatory requirements in accordance with evidential requirements and best practice
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: potential offenders, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/09
Source: “Interview potential offenders for breaches of regulatory requirements in accordance with evidential requirements and best practice.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing a suspect under caution follows strict legal rules and is done face to face by an authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating reports of animal attacks or cruelty by interviewing witnesses and collecting evidence
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: reports of animal attacks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/01
Source: “Investigate reports of animal attacks or cruelty by interviewing witnesses and collecting evidence.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviews and evidence gathering happen face to face, and only an authorised inspector may take statements that could later support a prosecution.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Giving evidence in court
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: evidence, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/04, 3581/09
Source: “Give evidence in court.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 1 out of 100 (0–5 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Only the person who saw what happened can be sworn in and questioned about it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Capturing and removing stray, uncontrolled or abused animals from undesirable conditions using appropriate tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: stray, uncontrolled or abused animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/01
Source: “Capture and remove stray, uncontrolled, or abused animals from undesirable conditions using appropriate tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Catching and removing an animal is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Rescuing animals from hazardous situations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 3581/01
Source: “Rescue animals from hazardous situations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Getting an animal out of danger is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Euthanising rabid, unclaimed or severely injured animals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rabid, unclaimed or severely injured animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/01
Source: “Euthanise rabid, unclaimed, or severely injured animals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Ending an animal's life is a hands-on act, and in Britain it is normally carried out by a qualified vet.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Taking animals into treatment areas for physical examinations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/01
Source: “Take animals into treatment areas for physical examinations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Moving an animal into a treatment area is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Supplying animals with food and water
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/01
Source: “Supply animals with food and water.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Feeding and watering animals is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning facilities and equipment like dog pens and animal control vans
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: facilities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/01
Source: “Clean facilities and equipment like dog pens and animal control vans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning pens and vans is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Verifying vertical and horizontal alignment of structural steel members
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: vertical, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Verify vertical and horizontal alignment of structural steel members, using appropriate equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking steelwork is plumb and level is done with instruments against the steel.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Testing soils or materials to determine the adequacy and strength of foundations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: soils, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Test soils or materials to determine the adequacy and strength of foundations, concrete, tarmac, or steel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing soil, concrete or steel means physically handling and loading the material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Testing air to identify particulates
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: air, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Test air to identify particulates such as mould, dust, or allergens.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sampling air for mould, dust or allergens means running equipment in the building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining and testing electrical power distribution machinery and equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrical power distribution machinery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/02
Source: “Examine and test electrical power distribution machinery and equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing electrical distribution equipment means putting instruments on live plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Taking samples of gases to determine gas quality and sulphur or moisture content
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of gases, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/02, 3581/05
Source: “Take samples of gases to determine gas quality and sulphur or moisture content.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking gas samples means being at the pipework with sampling equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting testing of air quality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: air quality, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct testing of air quality, noise, temperature, or radiation levels to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Measuring air quality, noise, temperature or radiation means putting instruments in the workplace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting samples of dust, gases, vapours or other potentially toxic materials for analysis
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of dust, gases, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04
Source: “Collect samples of dust, gases, vapours, or other potentially toxic materials for analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking air and dust samples means physically being there with the sampling kit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting samples of hazardous materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of hazardous materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/04, 3581/09
Source: “Collect samples of hazardous materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking samples of hazardous material is physical work at the location.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Measuring noise levels in workplaces
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: noise levels, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/04
Source: “Measure noise levels in workplaces.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Measuring noise means carrying a meter around the workplace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting samples physically to assess purity or cleanliness
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Inspect samples physically to assess purity or cleanliness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Physically examining a sample means handling it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing equipment used to collect or analyse samples
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Prepare equipment used to collect or analyse samples.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preparing sampling and analysis equipment is hands-on laboratory work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Taking photographs during site visits for documentation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: photographs during site visits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/04
Source: “Take photographs during site visits for documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking photographs on a site visit means being at the site with a camera.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining personal protective equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: personal protective equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Maintain personal protective equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Looking after protective equipment means checking and cleaning the kit itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing hazardous, radioactive or mixed waste samples for transportation or storage by treating, compacting, packaging and labelling them
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hazardous, radioactive or mixed waste samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/04
Source: “Prepare hazardous, radioactive, or mixed waste samples for transportation or storage by treating, compacting, packaging, and labelling them.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treating, compacting and packaging waste is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting laboratory analyses of samples to detect disease
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: laboratory analyses of samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/04
Source: “Conduct laboratory analyses of samples to detect disease.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Laboratory testing for disease means handling samples at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Demonstrating the use of safety equipment like oxygen masks
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the use of safety equipment like oxygen masks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/04
Source: “Demonstrate the use of safety equipment like oxygen masks, seat belts, and life jackets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Demonstrating safety equipment means holding it and showing people how it works.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Disposing of unfit meat according to health regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unfit meat, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 3581/07
Source: “Dispose of unfit meat according to health regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Removing and disposing of unfit meat is physical work in the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring accurate cutting and incision lines in the evisceration process to minimize contamination
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accurate, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/07
Source: “Ensure accurate cutting and incision lines in the evisceration process to minimize contamination.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Making clean incisions during evisceration is skilled knife work at the carcass.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting samples from animals, plants or products
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/07
Source: “Collect samples from animals, plants, or products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking samples from animals, plants or products is hands-on work where they are.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Examining animals or crop specimens to determine the presence of diseases or problems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/07
Source: “Examine animals or crop specimens to determine the presence of diseases or problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Examining an animal or crop specimen is hands-on, and in Britain diagnosing disease in animals is a vet's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Performing dressing process, including flaying, skimming and scalding to prevent damage and contamination
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: process, including flaying, skimming, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/07
Source: “Perform dressing process, including flaying, skimming, and scalding, to prevent damage and contamination.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Flaying, skimming and scalding a carcass is skilled physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Assisting in conducting post-mortem examinations on diseased animals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conducting post-mortem examinations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/07
Source: “Assist in conducting post-mortem examinations on diseased animals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assisting at a post-mortem on a diseased animal is hands-on work at the table.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating machinery for the slaughter process using safe and hygienic practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: machinery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/07
Source: “Operate machinery for the slaughter process using safe and hygienic practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Operating slaughter machinery is physical work on the line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Managing animals in the lairage facility following standard operating procedures and animal welfare practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 55 · 3581/07
Source: “Manage animals in the lairage facility following standard operating procedures and animal welfare practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handling animals in the lairage is physical work with live animals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Holding or restraining animals during veterinary procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: animals during veterinary procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/07
Source: “Hold or restrain animals during veterinary procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Holding an animal still is entirely physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Place products in containers according to grade
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: products, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/07
Source: “Place products in containers according to grade.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Putting graded product into containers is physical packing work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Participating in emergency response to provide radiological contingency arrangements to protect personnel
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: emergency response, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/08
Source: “Participate in emergency response to provide radiological contingency arrangements to protect personnel, plant, and the environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Emergency response means being physically deployed to protect people and plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Conducting surveillance testing to determine safety of nuclear equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surveillance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Conduct surveillance testing to determine safety of nuclear equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Surveillance testing means hands on the nuclear equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Measuring and identifying radiation types in work areas and equipment using radiation detectors
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radiation types, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/08
Source: “Measure and identify radiation types in work areas and equipment using radiation detectors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Measuring radiation in a work area means walking it with a detector.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting samples to ensure nuclear safety compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Collect samples to ensure nuclear safety compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Collecting nuclear compliance samples is hands-on work in the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Using specialist radiological protection instruments to monitor surface and airborne contamination using hand-held contamination rate-meters and installed and portable air samplers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specialist radiological protection instruments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/08
Source: “Use specialist radiological protection instruments to monitor surface and airborne contamination using hand-held contamination rate-meters and installed and portable air samplers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Contamination monitoring means carrying instruments around the area and taking readings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Modifying nuclear equipment used in operations to enhance operational safety and risk management
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: nuclear equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/08
Source: “Modify nuclear equipment used in operations to enhance operational safety and risk management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Modifying nuclear equipment is hands-on engineering work under strict control.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out functional tests of radiation protection monitoring instrumentation using calibrated radioactive sealed sources
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: functional tests of radiation protection monitoring instrumentation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 3581/08
Source: “Carry out functional tests of radiation protection monitoring instrumentation using calibrated radioactive sealed sources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Functional testing with sealed sources is hands-on work with the instruments and the source.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Analysing water samples for chemicals and pollutants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: water samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Analyse water samples for chemicals and pollutants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Analysing water samples for pollutants is bench work with the sample in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing accelerator systems to ensure optimal performance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accelerator systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Test accelerator systems to ensure optimal performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing an accelerator means working on the machine itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Using Forward Control Points, FCP) and Access Control Points
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: forward control points, fcp) and access control points, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 3581/08
Source: “Use Forward Control Points (FCP) and Access Control Points (ACP) to respond to and recover from nuclear incidents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Manning control points at a nuclear incident means being physically deployed at the scene.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Decontaminating objects by abrading with wire brushes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Decontaminate objects by abrading with wire brushes, buffing wheels, or sandblasting machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Abrading and blasting objects clean is physical work with the tool in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Maintaining and repairing accelerator systems to prevent malfunctions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accelerator systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Maintain and repair accelerator systems to prevent malfunctions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Maintaining and repairing accelerator systems is hands-on engineering.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating and calibrating specified instrumentation and laboratory equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specified instrumentation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Operate and calibrate specified instrumentation and laboratory equipment as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Operating and calibrating instruments means hands on the equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Setting up equipment to detect area radiation deviations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Set up equipment to detect area radiation deviations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Setting up radiation detection equipment means placing and calibrating it in the area.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Testing equipment to ensure proper operation in installation or maintenance tasks
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 3581/08
Source: “Test equipment to ensure proper operation in installation or maintenance tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Testing equipment means operating the equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying beer and spirit measures in pubs for correct serving sizes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: beer, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/09
Source: “Verify beer and spirit measures in pubs for correct serving sizes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking that a pub's measures pour correctly is done with the glasses on the bar.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Obtaining samples for compliance testing
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 3581/09
Source: “Obtain samples for compliance testing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking samples for testing means collecting the goods in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attaching onboard diagnostics, OBD) scanner cables to vehicles to conduct emissions inspections
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: onboard diagnostics, obd) scanner cables, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 3581/10
Source: “Attach onboard diagnostics (OBD) scanner cables to vehicles to conduct emissions inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Plugging a scanner into a vehicle is a physical act at the vehicle.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing vehicle components and systems using diagnostic equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: vehicle components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 3581/10
Source: “Test vehicle components and systems using diagnostic equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing vehicle systems means connecting equipment to the vehicle itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting low-pressure fuel evaluative tests to assess harmful emissions from vehicles lacking OBD equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: low-pressure fuel evaluative tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 3581/10
Source: “Conduct low-pressure fuel evaluative tests to assess harmful emissions from vehicles lacking OBD equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Running a fuel emissions test means hands on the vehicle and the test equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £39,000a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 44,300in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: work logs in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: maintaining work logs to record daily activities and progress and interpreting drawings, specifications, risk assessments, method statements and regulations to ensure compliance. What it cannot do is be answerable: structural inspections need a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: conducting structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 19% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 13% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 69% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 273 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Maintaining work logs to record daily activities and progress is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to work logs, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding: a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes: ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether structural inspections are in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near assessing project details to ensure adherence to environmental regulations. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to inspectors of standards and regulations (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was environmental health professionals: only about 4% of its durable work is work you already do. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 29/100 here, with only 19% of the task list in the top band, and “arrange veterinary treatment for rescued animals” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Environmental health professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “conduct routine or unplanned visits and inspections for health and safety compliance”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Health and safety managers and officers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “investigate accidents to identify causes and prevent future occurrences”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Quality control and planning engineers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “inspect project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation…”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 1% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 1% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 19% of its task weight, across 273 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like conducting structural inspections using survey instruments and tape measures arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Nuclear Technicians is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Nuclear Technicians, Occupational Health and Safety Technicians, Animal Control Workers, Court, Municipal, and License Clerks, Agricultural Inspectors and Transportation Inspectors. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Two honest options, and no deadline on either

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

A nearby route

There's no Space built for regulatory inspectors yet.

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

The closest match is Microsoft 365 Report Builders, a community for people who build business reports in Excel, Power Query and Power BI without a data team behind them. It overlaps with the part of your job that is growing: the monitoring and evidence layer: the reports and trails that show a rule was followed. It does not cover the regulations themselves. If that overlap isn't you, the free route below covers the same ground.

Try Microsoft 365 Report Builders free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

After the trial it is a paid community, and you get identical data either way. If the overlap above is not your job, the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for regulatory inspectors launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Inspectors of standards and regulations?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 273 official task statements scored for Inspectors of standards and regulations (United Kingdom, SOC 3581), 19% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 29 out of 100 (range 25–35, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Inspectors of standards and regulations” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Keep up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments” (100/100, very high); “Maintain work logs to record daily activities and progress” (93/100, very high); “Collect fees for driving licences to process applications” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Inspectors of standards and regulations” stay human?: About 69% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conduct low-pressure fuel evaluative tests to assess harmful emissions from vehicles lacking OBD equipment” (0/100, minimal); “Test vehicle components and systems using diagnostic equipment” (0/100, minimal); “Attach onboard diagnostics (OBD) scanner cables to vehicles to conduct emissions inspections” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Inspectors of standards and regulations” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 19% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 69% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Inspectors of standards and regulations calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 273 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
4 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.