Will AI replace Quality control and planning engineers?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 159 official task statements scored for Quality control and planning engineers (United Kingdom, SOC 2481), 31% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 41 out of 100 (range 35–47, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Quality control and planning engineers” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Produce quality control reports” (93/100, very high); “Generate inventory reports to manage stock levels” (93/100, very high); “Prepare reports on operations and system productivity or efficiency” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Quality control and planning engineers” stay human?

About 51% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain test equipment in operational condition by performing routine maintenance or making minor repairs or adjustments as needed” (0/100, minimal); “Draw samples of products for quality control tests” (0/100, minimal); “Maintain and repair laboratory equipment” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Quality control and planning engineers” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 31% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 51% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Quality control and planning engineers calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 159 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Quality control and planning engineers

communicating with designers to ensure design feasibility, designing energy-efficient civil structures and planning transportation or hydraulic systems and structures. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI is already taking a real slice of the routine work here: establishing standard operating procedures to ensure quality and consistency. That is a slice of tasks, not of you.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 31%
changing shape: 18%
staying human: 51%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 41 out of 100 (35–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 159 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for quality control and planning engineers is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

That slice is not coming back; the core of the job, testing products to ensure they meet specifications, stays yours. The tools change, the responsibility doesn't.

Your week, as this page understands it

Quality control and planning engineers plan production schedules, work sequences, and manufacturing and processing procedures to ensure accuracy, quality and reliability. The job title says “quality control” or “planning engineers”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: testing products to ensure they meet specifications. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But quality control and planning engineers is not one task. It is 159 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is testing products to ensure they meet specifications, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 31%
changing shape: 18%
staying human: 51%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

Shifting to AI

48 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Establishing standard operating procedures to ensure quality and consistency
This is reading one thing and writing another: standard operating procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2481/01, 2481/03
Source: “Establish standard operating procedures to ensure quality and consistency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standard operating procedures follow well-known patterns, so a usable draft comes out quickly for the engineer to tailor to the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending corrective actions for product failures
This is reading one thing and writing another: corrective actions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2481/01, 2481/03
Source: “Recommend corrective actions for product failures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once a failure is understood, recommending the fix draws on well-documented repair practice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying the latest fabric trends
This is reading one thing and writing another: the latest fabric trends in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2481/01
Source: “Identify the latest fabric trends, developments and innovations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Fabric trends are widely published and reported, so gathering and summarising them is quick desk research.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring garment production aligns with budget constraints
This is reading one thing and writing another: garment production aligns in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2481/01
Source: “Ensure garment production aligns with budget constraints.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking production spend against a budget is figures work that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

30 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Conducting planning engineering to develop long-term network reinforcement plans
The software now makes the first pass at develop long-term network reinforcement plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2481/02
Source: “Conduct planning engineering to develop long-term network reinforcement plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Long-term reinforcement planning uses established modelling, but the plan depends on network data and local growth assumptions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adapting existing designs to meet new requirements
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2481/01
Source: “Adapt existing designs to meet new requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reworking an existing design to new requirements can be drafted digitally, though the designer still judges the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing validation test data to determine if systems meet criteria
The software now makes the first pass at validation test data, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Analyse validation test data to determine if systems meet criteria.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Comparing validation results against acceptance criteria is rule-based analysis, though a qualified engineer owns the verdict.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

81 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Testing products to ensure they meet specifications
This work happens in the physical world: products, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/01, 2481/02
Source: “Test products to ensure they meet specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Products have to be physically put through their paces, so the testing itself cannot be done at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting the quality of work to ensure standards are met
This work happens in the physical world: the quality of work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance not published
No importance rating is published for this task, so the ordering here is ours.
Source: “Inspect the quality of work to ensure standards are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging whether work meets standard means looking at it where it was done.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with designers to ensure design feasibility
The value here is that a specific person handles designers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 95 · 2481/01
Source: “Communicate with designers to ensure design feasibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Feasibility questions get settled in back-and-forth with designers, where being trusted to push back matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 149 tasks

Producing quality control reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality control reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/01
Source: “Produce quality control reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning control data into a clear report is routine work that software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating inventory reports to manage stock levels
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: inventory reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/01
Source: “Generate inventory reports to manage stock levels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling stock figures into a report is exactly what till and stock systems already do automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports on operations and system productivity or efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/01
Source: “Prepare reports on operations and system productivity or efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Productivity and efficiency reports are built from system data, which software can assemble and write up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating cost estimates for labour and materials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cost estimates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Calculate cost estimates for labour and materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Costing labour and materials from rates and quantities is spreadsheet arithmetic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing software system testing and validation procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software system in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Develop software system testing and validation procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing testing and validation procedures is systematic, well-patterned work these tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining equipment logs that record test results for quality assurance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: equipment logs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Maintain equipment logs that record test results for quality assurance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping equipment logs of test results up to date is record-keeping done on a computer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing transport-related computer software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: transport-related computer software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/02
Source: “Develop transport-related computer software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing software is one of the strongest current uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Responding to customer enquiries
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: customer enquiries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2481/01
Source: “Respond to customer enquiries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering customer questions from known information is something software already does at speed and scale.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring accurate costing of materials and adherence to production budget
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate costing of materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/01
Source: “Ensure accurate costing of materials and adherence to production budget.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Costing materials and tracking them against a budget is spreadsheet work software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing production costs for sustainable designs using statistical studies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: production costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2481/01
Source: “Analyse production costs for sustainable designs using statistical studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Costing designs with statistics is number work using figures the business already holds, which software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating project timetables to ensure timely completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project timetables in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/02
Source: “Create project timetables to ensure timely completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a project programme from tasks, durations and dependencies is scheduling software already does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing budgets for projects to ensure cost-effective planning and execution
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Develop budgets for projects to ensure cost-effective planning and execution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a project budget from rates and quantities is spreadsheet work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying traffic patterns to identify engineering problems and assess project impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: traffic patterns in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Study traffic patterns to identify engineering problems and assess project impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Studying traffic patterns is analysis of counted and modelled data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the effectiveness of implemented changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the effectiveness of implemented changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Evaluate the effectiveness of implemented changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing before-and-after data to see whether a change worked is straightforward analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing administrative, technical or statistical reports on traffic-operation matters, such as accidents, safety measures or pedestrian volume or practices
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: administrative, technical or statistical reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Prepare administrative, technical, or statistical reports on traffic-operation matters, such as accidents, safety measures, or pedestrian volume or practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning traffic and accident figures into a clear report is standard analysis and writing that software produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying labour or material requirements for project execution
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: labour in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Specify labour or material requirements for project execution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out how much labour and material a job needs is well-documented estimating that software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing policies and devise strategies to enhance quality management systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Review policies and devise strategies to enhance quality management systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Policy review and quality strategy are document tasks software can draft well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining and analysing relevant information and data to evaluate performance and influence business results using it software and systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: relevant information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/02
Source: “Obtain and analyse relevant information and data to evaluate performance and influence business results using it software and systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling business data out of company systems and turning it into performance insight is a well trodden task for software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating new technologies to enhance product quality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new technologies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Investigate new technologies to enhance product quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Scanning what new technology exists and what it offers is reading and summarising work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating databases for tracking validation activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2481/03
Source: “Create databases for tracking validation activities, test results, or validated systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Building a tracking database from a known structure is exactly the kind of work software does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating load, grade requirements, water flow rates and material stress factors for design specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: load, grade requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/02
Source: “Calculate load, grade requirements, water flow rates, and material stress factors for design specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Load, flow and stress calculations follow published formulas and are exactly the sort of maths software gets right every time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing tender documents to plan engineering projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tender documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Design tender documents to plan engineering projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tender documents follow set structures and standard clauses, so a strong first draft can be produced quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making recommendations on the suitability of data for release
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Make recommendations on the suitability of data for release.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether data supports release is analysis against set criteria, with the formal release decision made elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing required method transfer documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: required method transfer documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Prepare required method transfer documentation including technical transfer protocols or reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Method transfer protocols follow standard templates, so a solid first draft is quick to produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing standard quality control operating procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: standard quality control operating procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Write standard quality control operating procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standard operating procedures follow a set structure and existing wording, so drafting one is largely assembly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing validation protocols for new or modified manufacturing processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: validation protocols in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Prepare validation protocols for new or modified manufacturing processes for pharmaceuticals, electronics, or other products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Validation protocols follow well-established formats, so drafting one from the process description is routine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying product characteristics or customer requirements to determine validation objectives and standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: product characteristics in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Study product characteristics or customer requirements to determine validation objectives and standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning product characteristics and customer requirements into validation objectives is structured analysis of written inputs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing technical reports, deviation reports, testing protocols and trend analyses
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical reports, deviation reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Write technical reports including deviation reports, testing protocols, and trend analyses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deviation reports and trend analyses are written from recorded data, which suits software well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing programmes of sampling and analysis for quality standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Develop programmes of sampling and analysis for quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing a sampling and testing programme follows published standards closely, which software turns into a usable plan quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating test cases for quality control processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: test cases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Formulate test cases for quality control processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing test cases from a specification is structured work software does quickly and thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supplying quality control data necessary for regulatory submissions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Supply quality control data necessary for regulatory submissions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling together the quality data a submission needs is compiling and formatting existing records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing testing protocols for validation studies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: protocols in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Develop testing protocols for validation studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Validation testing protocols follow set formats, so a good first draft comes quickly from the process description.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing validation master plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: validation master plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Develop validation master plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A validation master plan follows an established structure, so drafting one from the site information is routine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining process flow diagrams to ensure system integrity and efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: process flow diagrams in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2481/03
Source: “Maintain process flow diagrams to ensure system integrity and efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping process flow diagrams current is document maintenance from information already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and maintaining validation and compliance documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: validation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2481/03
Source: “Prepare and maintain validation and compliance documentation including engineering change notices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compliance documents and change notices follow fixed formats, so drafting and updating them is routine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing data from contract laboratories to ensure accuracy and regulatory compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2481/03
Source: “Review data from contract laboratories to ensure accuracy and regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking laboratory data for errors and compliance is detailed, rule-based reviewing that software does thoroughly and quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting or evaluating test results in accordance with applicable codes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: test results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/03
Source: “Interpret or evaluate test results in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, or procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing test results against a published standard is precise, rule-based work that software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing detailed reports based on validation and qualification test results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/03
Source: “Prepare detailed reports based on validation and qualification test results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up validation and qualification results is structured reporting from data, which software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing documentation, schematics and protocols
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation, schematics and protocols in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2481/03
Source: “Review documentation such as schematics and protocols.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading schematics and protocols for errors and gaps is careful document checking, which software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Projecting manage activities to ensure timely delivery and meet stakeholder and budget requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: manage activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Project manage activities to ensure timely delivery and meet stakeholder and budget requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project plans and tracking are well supported by these tools, though keeping delivery on course involves people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and submitting bids for new contracts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: bids in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Prepare and submit bids for new contracts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Bid documents follow familiar formats and are assembled from costings and past submissions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Scheduling validation testing with affected personnel
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: validation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Schedule validation testing with affected personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Fitting testing into people’s diaries is scheduling work that software already handles.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating quality control information to outside suppliers or contractors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality control information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Communicate quality control information to outside suppliers or contractors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Passing quality information to suppliers is largely written correspondence based on internal records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating testing with contract laboratories and vendors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: contract laboratories in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Coordinate testing with contract laboratories and vendors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating testing with outside laboratories is scheduling and correspondence, with some relationship management.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/01
Source: “Create designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design (CAD) software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can generate drawings and geometry, but production-ready CAD still needs an engineer to work over it properly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing transport systems to determine need for modification or expansion
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transport systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Assess transport systems to determine need for modification or expansion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing whether a transport system needs expanding is well-documented analysis, though the decisive evidence is local usage data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending solutions for identified quality problems in digital and physical products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Recommend solutions for identified quality problems in digital and physical products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting fixes needs real knowledge of how the product is made and where it keeps going wrong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining appropriate materials and production techniques based on product specifications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at appropriate materials, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2481/01
Source: “Determine appropriate materials and production techniques based on product specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Matching materials and production methods to a specification is a documented engineering choice software can make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and reviewing manufacturing standards and parameters to maintain product quality
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at standards, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2481/01
Source: “Monitor and review manufacturing standards and parameters to maintain product quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Watching production figures for drift and reviewing them against limits is data work software does continuously and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing products or processes for waste production and potential environmental pollution
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at products, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Analyse products or processes for waste production and potential environmental pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting waste and pollution risk in a process is well-documented analysis that software works through thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing contracts to ensure compliance with agreements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at contracts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Manage contracts to ensure compliance with agreements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking obligations and dates against a signed agreement is well-structured paperwork software handles well, with the engineer keeping oversight.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating topographical maps to guide installation and operations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at topographical maps, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/02
Source: “Create topographical maps to guide installation and operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning survey data into a topographical map is well-established processing work, though the underlying data comes from the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating engineering drawings, schematic diagrams, formulas or blueprints for staff
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drawings, schematic diagrams, formulas or blueprints, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2481/01
Source: “Create engineering drawings, schematic diagrams, formulas, or blueprints for staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing tools plus AI give a usable first draft, but engineering drawings still need the engineer to check them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing systems, processes or equipment for control, management or remediation of water, air or soil quality
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at systems, processes or equipment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Design systems, processes, or equipment for control, management, or remediation of water, air, or soil quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Treatment and control systems follow published engineering practice, so software drafts an outline the engineer then makes workable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modeling transport scenarios to evaluate the impacts of new development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transport scenarios, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/02
Source: “Model transport scenarios to evaluate the impacts of new development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Transport models rely on specialist software and locally collected traffic data, so a person still builds and calibrates them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing final project layout drawings that include stress calculations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at final project layout drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/02
Source: “Prepare final project layout drawings that include stress calculations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Layout drawings with stress calculations can be largely produced by software, but an engineer must work them into something buildable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning validation testing of alternative energy products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at validation testing of alternative energy products, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Plan validation testing of alternative energy products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning testing for newer energy products is documented in general, but the specifics of each product are still being worked out.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling manufacturing batch records for product tracking
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at batch records, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2481/01
Source: “Compile manufacturing batch records for product tracking.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Batch records are structured documents assembled from system data, which software compiles reliably for the engineer to check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying environmental risks for civil engineering projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environmental risks, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Identify environmental risks for civil engineering projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental risks on civil projects follow well-catalogued patterns, so a solid first assessment can be drafted from the project information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Completing data capture forms to support testing procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at data capture forms, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Complete data capture forms to support testing procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Filling in data capture forms is structured recording, though the readings come from someone at the test.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing responses to regulatory agencies regarding product information or issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at responses, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Provide responses to regulatory agencies regarding product information or issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Responses to a regulator are written documents, though a named accountable person has to stand behind every word.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting recommendations on containment, clean-up process, remediation, recycling and waste disposal to address environmental issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at recommendations, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Present recommendations on containment, clean-up process, remediation, recycling, and waste disposal to address environmental issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clean-up and disposal options are well documented, so recommendations draft easily, though presenting them convincingly still needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Undertaking design engineering to produce detailed plans and proposals for the electricity network
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at design, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Undertake design engineering to produce detailed plans and proposals for the electricity network.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Network design follows established practice, so software drafts proposals, but an engineer has to make them fit the real network.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing energy-efficient civil structures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at energy-efficient civil structures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Design energy-efficient civil structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Energy-efficient structural design follows known principles, so software drafts options an engineer then develops into a real design.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Planning transportation or hydraulic systems and structures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transportation, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Plan transportation or hydraulic systems and structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning transport and hydraulic works follows known methods, but the workable scheme depends on site details a person gathers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Analysing product returns and faults
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at product returns, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2481/01
Source: “Analyse product returns and faults.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Returns data can be analysed on screen, but understanding why a part failed often means physically examining it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing layout of equipment or workspaces to achieve maximum efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at layout of equipment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 55 · 2481/01
Source: “Design layout of equipment or workspaces to achieve maximum efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Layouts can be drawn and optimised automatically, though the measurements come from the workspace itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing production, inventory or quality assurance programmes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at production, inventory or quality assurance programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2481/01
Source: “Develop production, inventory, or quality assurance programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Draft programmes can be produced automatically, but they have to be shaped around this plant's realities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing methods to quality assure their work and others' analyses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/02
Source: “Develop and implement methods to quality assure their work and others' analyses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking methods can be drafted from standards, but embedding them depends on colleagues accepting the person behind them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating new testing and sampling methodologies or technologies to determine usefulness
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new testing and sampling methodologies or technologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Evaluate new testing and sampling methodologies or technologies to determine usefulness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a new test method is useful usually means trying it out on the real process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying quality problems in engineering or assurance processes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quality problems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Identify quality problems in engineering or assurance processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Patterns in quality data show up in analysis, but some problems only reveal themselves on the floor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Giving technical advice to staff and students
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technical advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2481/01
Source: “Give technical advice to staff and students.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written technical advice is well within software's reach, though staff and students often want to ask a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Solving materials production problems with experiential or innovative solutions
staying human
The ratings behind this row put materials production problems well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2481/01
Source: “Solve materials production problems with experiential or innovative solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software offers options, but solving awkward production problems leans on experience of that specific process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engineering erosion and sedimentation control systems for transport projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put erosion well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Engineer erosion and sedimentation control systems for transport projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Erosion control design follows published guidance, so software drafts a scheme the engineer adapts to the ground conditions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating and resolving product non-conformance issues
staying human
The ratings behind this row put product non-conformance issues well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Investigate and resolve product non-conformance issues, recommending corrective action.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can propose likely causes and draft the corrective action, but confirming the real cause usually means going to the line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing new testing methods for quality control
staying human
The ratings behind this row put new testing methods well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Develop new testing methods for quality control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A new test method can be drafted from the literature, but it has to be tried out on real product before anyone trusts it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing quality improvement programmes to enhance textile production standards
staying human
The ratings behind this row put quality improvement programmes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2481/01
Source: “Implement quality improvement programmes to enhance textile production standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Quality programmes are well documented and can be drafted, but making one stick means working with the people on the line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning alteration or modification of existing transport structures to improve safety or function
staying human
The ratings behind this row put alteration well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Plan alteration or modification of existing transport structures to improve safety or function.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning changes to a structure draws on standard methods, though the workable answer depends on the specific site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing the environmental impacts of engineering
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the environmental impacts well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Assess the environmental impacts of engineering, architecture, or research and development activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessment follows a set structure, but the conclusions depend on surveys and local information gathered on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Evaluating projects' impact on traffic and traffic control adequacy at development sites
staying human
The ratings behind this row put projects' impact well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Evaluate projects' impact on traffic and traffic control adequacy at development sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Traffic impact assessment follows standard methods, but the answer turns on counts and local conditions gathered at the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Recommending and implementing performance improvements in quality assurance processes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put performance improvements well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Recommend and implement performance improvements in quality assurance processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommendations can be drafted, but putting improvements into practice happens with the team on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing and conducting internal audits to ensure compliance with standards
staying human
The ratings behind this row put internal audits well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Manage and conduct internal audits to ensure compliance with standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Audit paperwork drafts easily, but a real internal audit means walking the floor and asking people what they actually do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating or reporting questionable test results
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for questionable test results, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Investigate or report questionable test results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Investigating a doubtful result means going back to the sample and the equipment, with a qualified person owning the conclusion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modifying testing methods or revising objectives and standards to resolve testing problems
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for methods, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Modify testing methods or revise objectives and standards to resolve testing problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Method changes can be drafted from the standards, but a qualified engineer has to make and justify the change.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training a team of quality control technicians
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a team of quality control technicians and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Train a team of quality control technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training technicians involves showing them the work and answering questions as they go.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training others in new processes and standard operating procedures
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Train others in new processes and standard operating procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Procedures are written down, but people take up new ways of working from a colleague who shows them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing staff in quality control and analytical procedures
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 55 · 2481/03
Source: “Instruct staff in quality control and analytical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching laboratory and control procedures relies on showing people and correcting them as they practise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing standard production rate or improving efficiency by studying time
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: standard production rate, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2481/01
Source: “Establish standard production rate or improve efficiency by studying time, motion, methods, and speed involved in maintenance, production, or other operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The calculations are easy, but timing and studying how work is actually done means standing on the shop floor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing lighting systems to determine need for modification or expansion
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2481/02
Source: “Assess lighting systems to determine need for modification or expansion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Lighting assessments involve night-time surveys as well as calculation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Undertaking operational delivery engineering to plan and manage a range of activities on the network
staying human
The ratings behind this row put operational delivery well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2481/02
Source: “Undertake operational delivery engineering to plan and manage a range of activities on the network.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning and managing network activities uses standard methods, but it depends on live local conditions and the crews doing the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the layout planning of construction projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the layout planning of construction projects well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Oversee the layout planning of construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Layout planning follows established practice, but overseeing it means keeping track of a live site and the people on it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Auditing performance qualification processes to ensure regulatory adherence
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for performance qualification processes, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Audit performance qualification processes to ensure regulatory adherence.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Audit paperwork can be prepared automatically, but the audit itself has to be done and signed by a qualified auditor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising customers on selecting suitable fabrics for their clothing projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles customers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2481/01
Source: “Advise customers on selecting suitable fabrics for their clothing projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Fabric guidance is documented, but customers want a person who has felt the cloth to advise them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with architects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles architects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Liaise with architects, engineers and designers to understand their design requirements and provide technical advice to manufacturing and construction technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Passing design intent between designers and the shop floor depends on back-and-forth with real people who know the job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attending training programmes on validation principles and emerging technologies
staying human
The ratings behind this row put programmes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Attend training programmes on validation principles and emerging technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Course material can be summarised instantly, but the point is the engineer’s own updated knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and monitoring production techniques and work sequences to enhance garment quality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: production techniques, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2481/01
Source: “Develop and monitor production techniques and work sequences to enhance garment quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Work sequences can be drafted on paper, but improving them means watching the line and trying changes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying issues that may lead to bespoke garment fitting problems and report findings and recommendations to improve them
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: issues, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2481/01
Source: “Identify issues that may lead to bespoke garment fitting problems and report findings and recommendations to improve them.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spotting fitting problems needs the garment on someone, although the write-up afterwards is ordinary report work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining compliance with health, safety and environmental legislation, ensuring a safe working environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Maintain compliance with health, safety and environmental legislation, ensuring a safe working environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping a workplace safe and lawful needs people acting in the plant, though the underlying rules are fully published.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing innovative solutions to complex technical engineering problems using analytical techniques
staying human
The ratings behind this row put innovative solutions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Develop innovative solutions to complex technical engineering problems using analytical techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Genuinely novel engineering problems produce useful starting points at best, and an engineer has to do the real work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing stakeholders and maintaining effective communication throughout construction projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles stakeholders and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Manage stakeholders and maintain effective communication throughout construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping clients, neighbours and contractors on side depends on relationships built by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Controlling the electrical network remotely
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the electrical network, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Control the electrical network remotely, ensuring safe and efficient operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Switching a live electricity network is done from a screen, but only a specifically authorised person is allowed to do it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Evaluating the quality of materials used in production
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the quality of materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2481/01
Source: “Evaluate the quality of materials used in production.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Lab results can be read by software, but judging materials often means handling them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing asset management activities to maintain and improve the integrity of the electricity network
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: asset management activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Perform asset management activities to maintain and improve the integrity of the electricity network.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Asset planning uses data well, but keeping network equipment sound means work out on the network itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating out-of-specification product issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: out-of-specification product issues, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Investigate out-of-specification product issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Chasing an out-of-specification result means going to the line and the samples, with a qualified engineer owning the outcome.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Validating and transferring analytical methods following relevant policies and guidelines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: analytical methods following relevant policies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2481/03
Source: “Validate and transfer analytical methods following relevant policies and guidelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Transferring a method means running it in the new laboratory, with a qualified analyst answering for the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Validating or characterising sustainable or environmentally friendly products using electronic testing platforms
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sustainable, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 55 · 2481/03
Source: “Validate or characterise sustainable or environmentally friendly products using electronic testing platforms.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Electronic test platforms give the data, but the products still have to be set up and run on the rig.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Sourcing fabrics and trimmings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fabrics, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2481/01
Source: “Source fabrics and trimmings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Suppliers are found online, but choosing a fabric usually means handling swatches.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing fabric testing processes to ensure quality standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fabric testing processes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2481/01
Source: “Oversee fabric testing processes to ensure quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Test standards are documented, but overseeing lab testing means being around the samples and the people running them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing plans for new transport systems
staying human
The ratings behind this row put plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Design plans for new transport systems including airports and motorways.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Designing a new airport or motorway is original work where software offers fragments an engineer must largely rebuild.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing engineering solutions for cleaning up industrial accidents
staying human
The ratings behind this row put solutions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Develop engineering solutions for cleaning up industrial accidents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Cleaning up after an industrial accident is one-off engineering where each situation differs and software offers only starting points.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating contracts with customers and suppliers for engineering projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contracts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Negotiate contracts with customers and suppliers for engineering projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract terms can be drafted well, but the deal itself is settled through live bargaining with people who must trust you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting data, maps or other information at construction-related public hearings or meetings
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles data, maps or other information and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 55 · 2481/02
Source: “Present data, maps, or other information at construction-related public hearings or meetings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Preparing the material is straightforward, but standing in front of a public hearing and answering questions remains a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting environmental impact statements and right-of-way descriptions in public forums
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles environmental impact statements and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2481/02
Source: “Present environmental impact statements and right-of-way descriptions in public forums.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The statement can be written by software, but presenting it to a public audience and taking questions is a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting training in equipment operations to ensure product quality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment operations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Conduct training in equipment operations to ensure product quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training on equipment happens at the machine, and people learn it from someone they can ask questions of.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring worker performance to ensure equipment operation meets quality standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: worker performance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/01
Source: “Monitor worker performance to ensure equipment operation meets quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Watching how people run equipment on the floor means being there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Working in full compliance with health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: full compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2481/01
Source: “Work in full compliance with health, safety, and environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (6–30 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: This is about how someone behaves while working in a real plant, which no software can do on their behalf.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting internal audits
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: internal audits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Conduct internal audits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Internal audits mean walking the area and interviewing people, with a qualified auditor answering for the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring work processes to ensure standard compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work processes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Monitor work processes to ensure standard compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Watching how work is actually carried out means being where the work happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring effective lab practices and adherence to Health & Safety procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: effective lab practices, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2481/03
Source: “Ensure effective lab practices and adherence to Health & Safety procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping a laboratory safe and well run means being in it, watching how people actually work and stepping in.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing engineering activities in compliance with regulatory requirements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2481/02
Source: “Implement engineering activities in compliance with regulatory requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (2–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Carrying out engineering work within the rules means people doing things in real places, whatever the paperwork says.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising testing activities for validation purposes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2481/03
Source: “Supervise testing activities for validation purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Supervising testing means being present while it runs and holding the qualification to vouch for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting components
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2481/01
Source: “Inspect components produced.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Looking over produced parts means physically handling and measuring them, though recording the result afterwards is simple.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring the delivery and quality of construction materials to ensure project specifications are met
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the delivery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Monitor the delivery and quality of construction materials to ensure project specifications are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking delivered materials on a construction site means being on that site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating product colourfastness and chemical resistance to maintain quality standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: product colourfastness, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/01
Source: “Evaluate product colourfastness and chemical resistance to maintain quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Colourfastness and chemical resistance are measured by running physical tests on samples.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff in specific job roles to enhance performance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Train staff in specific job roles to enhance performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training someone in a job role means showing them at the machine and watching them try.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in surveying to establish reference points
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surveying, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Participate in surveying to establish reference points, levels, or elevations for construction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Survey points have to be physically established on the ground with instruments, even though the coordinates are then ordinary data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing soils or materials to determine the adequacy and strength of foundations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: soils, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/02
Source: “Test soils or materials to determine the adequacy and strength of foundations, concrete, tarmac, or steel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Materials have to be physically loaded and broken in a rig, so the testing itself cannot be done on screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing laboratory tests to produce reliable data for scientific investigations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: laboratory tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Perform laboratory tests to produce reliable data for scientific investigations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Laboratory tests need hands on samples and instruments, even though the resulting data is then handled on a screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Qualitying assess natural fibres
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: assess natural fibres, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2481/01
Source: “Quality assess natural fibres.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging natural fibre quality relies on handling and looking at the fibre itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and troubleshooting equipment problems to ensure product standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment problems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Identify and troubleshoot equipment problems to ensure product standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Tracking down an equipment fault means being at the machine with it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Visuallying inspect completed products for defects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: inspect completed products, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2481/03
Source: “Visually inspect completed products for defects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spotting defects by eye needs someone looking at the actual finished product.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the dyeing, printing and finishing processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the dyeing, printing and finishing processes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2481/01
Source: “Oversee the dyeing, printing, and finishing processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Dyeing and finishing are watched and adjusted on the floor as they run.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting completed transportation projects to ensure compliance with environmental regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: completed transportation projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/02
Source: “Inspect completed transportation projects to ensure compliance with environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Confirming a finished project meets environmental conditions means going and looking at what was actually built.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing construction workers to ensure project timelines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction workers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2481/02
Source: “Oversee construction workers to ensure project timelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping a site to programme means being there with the workers day to day.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: project sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2481/02
Source: “Inspect project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking progress and workmanship means walking the site, which no amount of paperwork replaces.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting non-routine analyses of the same materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: non-routine analyses of the same materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Conduct non-routine analyses of the same materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Non-routine analysis is bench work on real material by a qualified analyst.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting initial sample fittings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: initial sample fittings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2481/01
Source: “Conduct initial sample fittings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: A first fitting happens on a real body with the garment in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Setting up garment production equipment for use to ensure manufacturing efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: garment production equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2481/01
Source: “Set up garment production equipment for use to ensure manufacturing efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting up production machinery is hands-on work at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Calibrating garment equipment to ensure production accuracy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: garment equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/01
Source: “Calibrate garment equipment to ensure production accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Calibrating equipment is done with hands on the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Setting up and operating production equipment in accordance with current good manufacturing practices and standard operating procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: and operating production equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/01
Source: “Set up and operate production equipment in accordance with current good manufacturing practices and standard operating procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting up and running production equipment happens with hands on the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Knitting or weaving yarn into fabrics to develop innovative textile solutions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: yarn, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2481/01
Source: “Knit or weave yarn into fabrics to develop innovative textile solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Knitting or weaving yarn into fabric is machine and handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Spinning fibres into yarn for garment production
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fibres, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2481/01
Source: “Spin fibres into yarn for garment production.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spinning fibre into yarn happens at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Inspecting products to ensure they meet specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: products, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2481/02
Source: “Inspect products to ensure they meet specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking that delivered products match the specification means physically examining them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating and maintaining equipment relevant to the site environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 55 · 2481/02
Source: “Operate and maintain equipment relevant to the site environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running and servicing site equipment is hands-on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Calibrating equipment to ensure product quality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2481/03
Source: “Calibrate equipment to ensure product quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Calibrating equipment means adjusting the instrument itself by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Receiving and handling raw materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: raw materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2481/03
Source: “Receive and handle raw materials, ensuring food safety and quality standards are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking in and handling raw materials is physical goods work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining and repairing laboratory equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: laboratory equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2481/03
Source: “Maintain and repair laboratory equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Repairing apparatus needs hands and tools on the equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Drawing samples of products for quality control tests
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of products, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2481/03
Source: “Draw samples of products for quality control tests.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking a physical sample from a product requires hands at the production line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Maintaining test equipment in operational condition by performing routine maintenance or making minor repairs or adjustments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: test equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2481/03
Source: “Maintain test equipment in operational condition by performing routine maintenance or making minor repairs or adjustments as needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping test equipment working means adjusting and repairing it by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £43,600a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 35,700in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: standard operating procedures in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: establishing standard operating procedures to ensure quality and consistency and recommending corrective actions for product failures. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where products get done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Establishing standard operating procedures to ensure quality and consistency is going; testing products to ensure they meet specifications is not.

So, given all that: 31% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 18% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 51% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 159 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (testing products to ensure they meet specifications) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles testing products to ensure they meet specifications, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to quality control and planning engineers (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was quality assurance and regulatory professionals: only about 5% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 31/69: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “inspect the quality of work to ensure standards are met”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Quality assurance and regulatory professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already evaluate the quality of materials used in production, and their equivalent is to collect and analyse production samples to evaluate quality. Across both published task lists that is about 5% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Science, engineering and production technicians n.e.c.
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “determine appropriate materials and production techniques based on product specifications”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £36,102 against your £43,592, 17.2% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Production managers and directors in manufacturing
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already inspect the quality of work to ensure standards are met, and their equivalent is to ensure that quality standards and targets for orders are met. Across both published task lists that is about 4% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 31% of its task weight, across 159 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers, Health and Safety Engineers, Except Mining Safety Engineers and Inspectors, Materials Engineers, Nuclear Engineers and Engineers, All Other. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for quality control / planning engineers, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 31% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for quality control / planning engineers. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for quality control / planning engineers launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for quality control / planning engineers yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for quality control / planning engineers existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for quality control / planning engineers launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Quality control and planning engineers?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 159 official task statements scored for Quality control and planning engineers (United Kingdom, SOC 2481), 31% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 41 out of 100 (range 35–47, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Quality control and planning engineers” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Produce quality control reports” (93/100, very high); “Generate inventory reports to manage stock levels” (93/100, very high); “Prepare reports on operations and system productivity or efficiency” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Quality control and planning engineers” stay human?: About 51% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain test equipment in operational condition by performing routine maintenance or making minor repairs or adjustments as needed” (0/100, minimal); “Draw samples of products for quality control tests” (0/100, minimal); “Maintain and repair laboratory equipment” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Quality control and planning engineers” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 31% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 51% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Quality control and planning engineers calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 159 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
No importance weighting is published for some of these tasks, so they are treated as equally central, which is a simplification rather than a measurement.
2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
49 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
At least one of this occupation's task rows has no published task-relatedness and falls back to the uniform weight: the documented exception path, not an alternative weighting scheme.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness-with-uniform)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.