UK data
Local government administrative occupations
calculating rents, council tax and business rates, referring applicants to other agencies for assistance and obtaining all necessary information effectively. If that's your week, this page is about your job.
The honest answer
This job is splitting in two: arranging meetings is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications is work it can't touch.
Which half fills your week decides your exposure. Moving toward the second half is a real, doable plan.
Your week, as this page understands it
Local government administrative occupations undertake a variety of administrative and clerical duties in local government offices and departments. The job title says “local government administrative occupations”. The real job is the part underneath: interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications. That is the thing someone has to be right about.
The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But local government administrative occupations is not one task. It is 78 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications, and the ledger below shows exactly why.
Where the work sits, by task weight
- shifting to AI
- 51%
- changing shape
- 23%
- staying human
- 26%
These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.
Whole-job exposure score 57 out of 100 (51–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 78 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.
How we know this
What is measured: Every published task statement for local government administrative occupations is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.
How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.
Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.
Your job, task by task
These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.
Shifting to AI
39 tasksTasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.
Arranging meetings
This is reading one thing and writing another: meetings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/01, 4112/02, 4112/03Source: “Arrange meetings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding a slot and sending invitations is routine scheduling work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Responding to public enquiries
This is reading one thing and writing another: public enquiries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/01, 4112/02Source: “Respond to public enquiries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering common public questions is documented work already handled by automated services.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating rents, council tax and business rates
This is reading one thing and writing another: rents, council tax and business rates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 4112/03Source: “Calculate rents, council tax and business rates.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rents, council tax and business rates follow published formulas, so the calculation itself is straightforward for software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering enquiries about application procedure
This is reading one thing and writing another: enquiries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 4112/01Source: “Answer enquiries about application procedure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Application procedures are written down, so a system can answer most enquiries, though callers sometimes need a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Changing shape
19 tasksTasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.
Evaluating recorded data to determine eligibility status
The software now makes the first pass at recorded data, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 4112/01Source: “Evaluate recorded data to determine eligibility status.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Applying eligibility rules to recorded data suits software, but the entitlement decision that follows is a formal council one.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Initiating procedures to grant, modify, deny or terminating assistance
The software now makes the first pass at procedures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 4112/01Source: “Initiate procedures to grant, modify, deny, or terminate assistance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Starting, changing or stopping someone's assistance is a formal council decision an authorised officer has to make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging legal action against debtors
The software now makes the first pass at legal action against debtors, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 4112/03Source: “Arrange legal action against debtors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Starting legal action follows set steps software can prepare, but the process needs legally accountable people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Staying human
20 tasksTasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.
Interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for applicants, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 4112/01Source: “Interview and investigate applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing and checking out applicants for support means meeting people, weighing private circumstances, and reaching a formal council decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Recovering rent and council tax arrears
The value here is that a specific person handles rent and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 4112/03Source: “Recover rent and council tax arrears.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Recovering arrears involves difficult conversations with residents as well as the letters software can produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interviewing benefits recipients at specified intervals to certify their eligibility for continuing benefits
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for benefits recipients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 4112/01Source: “Interview benefits recipients at specified intervals to certify their eligibility for continuing benefits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Re-checking someone's benefit entitlement means a real conversation, often face to face, and the decision that follows is a formal one.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Show the other 68 tasks
Gathering data and preparing reports to inform decision-making
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/01Source: “Gather data and prepare reports to inform decision-making.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling data together into reports is one of the strongest areas for current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering specific supplies required for the maintenance of facilities
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: specific supplies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/02Source: “Order specific supplies required for the maintenance of facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ordering maintenance supplies follows set suppliers and rules that ordering systems already handle.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Checking tax forms for correct names and National Insurance numbers
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: tax forms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/03Source: “Check tax forms for correct names and National Insurance numbers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Matching names and National Insurance numbers against records is straightforward automated checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inputting tax return information into computers for processing
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: tax return information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Input tax return information into computers for processing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keying return information into the system is data entry that software handles directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring loans and accounts to ensure payments are up to date
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: loans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Monitor loans and accounts to ensure payments are up to date.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring whether accounts are up to date is structured tracking council systems already do automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining knowledge of tax code changes
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: knowledge of tax code changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Maintain knowledge of tax code changes, and of accounting procedures and theory to properly evaluate financial information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tax law changes are published in full, so keeping up to date is well suited to automatic summarising.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating amounts due based on information and legislation when dealing with new claims or accounts
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: amounts due in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 4112/01Source: “Calculate amounts due based on information and legislation when dealing with new claims or accounts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out what someone is owed from rules and legislation is calculation software does reliably, with officers accountable for decisions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring the payments of benefits throughout the duration of a claim
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: the payments of benefits throughout the duration in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 4112/01Source: “Monitor the payments of benefits throughout the duration of a claim.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Watching benefit payments across a claim is structured monitoring council systems already flag automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing records for completeness, accuracy and compliance with regulations
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 4112/01Source: “Review records for completeness, accuracy, and compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking records are complete and compliant is rule-based reviewing software does reliably, feeding a decision taken elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing business or government forms for submission
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: business in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/01Source: “Prepare business or government forms for submission.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Filling in standard business and government forms is highly structured work AI does reliably before submission.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing forms to facilitate access to medical services
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: forms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/01Source: “Prepare forms to facilitate access to medical services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing forms that open access to medical services is structured form-work AI completes accurately from the case record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Organising and collecting data for external inspections
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Organise and collect data for external inspections, including evidence of compliance with legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling together evidence for an inspection is document assembly AI does well, ahead of the inspector's own review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sending notices to taxpayers when accounts are in arrears
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: notices in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/03Source: “Send notices to taxpayers when accounts are in arrears.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Arrears notices are templated letters generated automatically from the account record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Issuing a refund for overpayment
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: a refund in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/03Source: “Issue a refund for overpayment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Issuing a refund for an overpayment is a rule-based system step, released by someone with authority to approve it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying computations and amounts against supporting documentation
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: computations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Verify computations and amounts against supporting documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking figures against supporting paperwork is exactly what automated matching does well; a manager still signs off the result elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging interviews for benefits claimants to address eligibility queries
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: interviews in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 4112/01Source: “Arrange interviews for benefits claimants to address eligibility queries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Booking interviews around diaries and eligibility queries is scheduling work that software already handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging for necessary maintenance or notifying owners of maintenance needs
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: necessary maintenance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 4112/02Source: “Arrange for necessary maintenance or notify owners of maintenance needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Arranging repairs and notifying owners is scheduling and messaging that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contacting taxpayers by post or telephone to address discrepancies and to request supporting documentation
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: taxpayers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/03Source: “Contact taxpayers by post or telephone to address discrepancies and to request supporting documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Chasing discrepancies and asking for documents is standard correspondence that can be generated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Utilising critical thinking, analytical and statistical skills to evaluate and interpret complex information and data
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: critical thinking, analytical and statistical skills in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/01Source: “Utilise critical thinking, analytical, and statistical skills to evaluate and interpret complex information and data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing and interpreting complex data suits software well, with officers judging what the findings mean locally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing budgets to ensure efficient use of resources
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Manage budgets to ensure efficient use of resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Managing a budget against actual spend is standard finance system work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in developing alternative plans or recommendations for programmes or projects
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: developing alternative plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Assist in developing alternative plans or recommendations for programmes or projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting alternative plans and recommendations is written analysis software produces well for officers to refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in the formulation of policies and procedures
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: the formulation of policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Assist in the formulation of policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting policies and procedures from existing guidance is strong ground for software, with officers and councillors deciding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring performance and quality issues in local government services
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: performance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Monitor performance and quality issues in local government services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring service performance and quality is data work software does well, with officers judging what needs action.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring the implementation of policies and procedures
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: the implementation of policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Monitor the implementation of policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking that policies are being followed is documented review work AI supports.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting on performance and quality issues to ensure value for money
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: performance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Report on performance and quality issues to ensure value for money.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Performance and value-for-money reporting is analysis of records the organisation already holds.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting information, eligibility requirements, application details and payment methods
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: information, eligibility requirements, application details and payment methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 4112/01Source: “Interpret information including eligibility requirements, application details, and payment methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Explaining eligibility rules, application steps and payment options is well-documented information work AI handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Correctlying handle changes in customers' circumstances and recalculate amounts due
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: handle changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 4112/01Source: “Correctly handle changes in customers' circumstances and recalculate amounts due as needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recalculating after a change of circumstances follows set rules, though the change has to be understood correctly first.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling information, residents' daily activities and the quantities of supplies used to prepare required reports
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: information, residents' daily activities and the quantities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Compile information such as residents' daily activities and the quantities of supplies used to prepare required reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compiling activity and supply information into required reports is routine collation software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating taxes owed and ensuring compliance with payment
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: taxes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/03Source: “Calculate taxes owed and ensure compliance with payment, reporting, or other tax requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Council tax and rates calculations follow published rules software applies accurately, but the demand issued is a formal council act.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing taxpayers of any overpayment or underpayment
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: taxpayers of any overpayment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/03Source: “Inform taxpayers of any overpayment or underpayment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Telling someone they have paid too much or too little is a standard notification generated from the account record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing taxpayers with information and advice for correct tax form completion
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: taxpayers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/03Source: “Provide taxpayers with information and advice for correct tax form completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Helping people fill in tax forms draws on published guidance AI explains well, and tax advice itself is unlicensed in Britain.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Posting charge statements to customers
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: charge statements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Post charge statements to customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing charge statements is automatic from the billing system, though posting them out involves handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Referring applicants to other agencies for assistance
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: applicants in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 4112/01Source: “Refer applicants to other agencies for assistance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Matching someone's situation to the right agency is a look-up task, but local knowledge still matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing and evaluating projects to ensure they meet objectives within budget and timeline
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Manage and evaluate projects to ensure they meet objectives within budget and timeline.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project tracking and evaluation is well supported by these tools, though keeping delivery on course involves people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing information, advice and guidance on policy and performance
shifting to AIThis is reading one thing and writing another: information, advice and guidance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Provide information, advice, and guidance on policy and performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Explaining policy and performance draws on published documents, so software drafts answers people then discuss.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing reports and keeping records on legal consultations
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at reports, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 4112/01Source: “Write reports and keep records on legal consultations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 59 out of 100 (52–66 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up notes of a legal consultation is drafting work AI does well, though the substance comes from a private meeting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting payments from customers
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at payments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Collect payments from customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 59 out of 100 (52–66 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Council payments now mostly arrive online or by direct debit and software records them, though a counter still handles some cash.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Submitting contested tax decisions for appeals hearings
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at contested tax decisions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Submit contested tax decisions for appeals hearings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 59 out of 100 (52–66 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing and lodging appeal papers is documented procedure AI supports, though the hearing itself happens elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Planning client-centred programmes and services for various groups
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at client-centred programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Plan client-centred programmes and services for various groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 57 out of 100 (50–64 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning services for groups can be drafted from documented practice, though local need shapes the final programme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Calculating and authorising amounts of assistance
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at amounts of assistance, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 4112/01Source: “Calculate and authorise amounts of assistance for programmes including grants, monetary payments, and food vouchers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Working out the amount follows published rules, but signing off a council award is a formal decision an authorised officer must make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating the implementation of council decisions and circulate reports
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at the implementation of council decisions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Coordinate the implementation of council decisions and circulate reports to those affected.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Circulating decisions and coordinating who does what is administrative work software handles, with accountability staying local.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing filed tax returns to determine whether claimed tax reliefs and deductions are allowed by law
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at filed tax returns, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Review filed tax returns to determine whether claimed tax reliefs and deductions are allowed by law.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking whether a relief is allowed follows published law, but ruling on someone's return is a formal decision an officer makes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining all necessary information effectively
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at all necessary information, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 4112/01Source: “Obtain all necessary information effectively, considering each customer's individual circumstances.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting the full picture from a resident takes a careful conversation, though software can prompt what to ask.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adapting communication style to effectively manage customer expectations
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at communication style, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 4112/01Source: “Adapt communication style to effectively manage customer expectations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can adjust tone and wording, but managing expectations works because a person is listening and responding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing social workers with pertinent information gathered during applicant interviews
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at social workers, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 4112/01Source: “Provide social workers with pertinent information gathered during applicant interviews.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Summarising interview notes for a social worker is drafting work AI does well, though the useful detail comes from the conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating in line with organizational policies
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at line, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 4112/01Source: “Operate in line with organizational policies, standards, and security requirements to ensure data privacy and confidentiality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following data protection and security rules is mostly about how a person behaves, though systems enforce much of it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending corrective actions to address specific issues in compliance and operations
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at corrective actions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Recommend corrective actions to address specific issues in compliance and operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting fixes for compliance problems is drafting work AI supports, though the useful detail sits in local records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating with council services for project compliance
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at council services, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Coordinate with council services for project compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating compliance across council services is largely correspondence, though agreement depends on colleagues working together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting taxes from individuals or businesses according to prescribed laws and regulations
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at taxes, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 4112/03Source: “Collect taxes from individuals or businesses according to prescribed laws and regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Council tax collection follows published rules and runs largely through systems, but it is a formal act under statutory powers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Imposing payment deadlines on delinquent taxpayers
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at payment deadlines, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 4112/03Source: “Impose payment deadlines on delinquent taxpayers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Setting a deadline for an unpaid council bill is a formal step under statutory powers, decided by an authorised officer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Retrieving overpayments from customers
changing shapeThe software now makes the first pass at overpayments, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 4112/03Source: “Retrieve overpayments from customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reclaiming overpayments follows set rules, but persuading people to repay involves sensitive conversations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting applicants in completing application forms for job referrals or Jobseeker's Allowance claims
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles applicants and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 4112/01Source: “Assist applicants in completing application forms for job referrals or Jobseeker's Allowance claims.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Forms can be filled in with digital help, but many claimants need someone sitting with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Servicing meetings by preparing necessary materials and equipment
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: meetings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Service meetings by preparing necessary materials and equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Servicing meetings mixes preparing papers, which software drafts, with setting up rooms and equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interviewing doctors, medical specialists or employers to get additional information
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles doctors, medical specialists or employers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 4112/01Source: “Interview doctors, medical specialists, or employers to get additional information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting extra detail from a doctor or employer depends on a live conversation, though notes can be drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Determining appropriate methods of debt settlement
staying humanThe rules require a named, qualified person to answer for appropriate methods of debt settlement, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 4112/03Source: “Determine appropriate methods of debt settlement, such as offers of compromise, attachment of earnings, or seizure and sale of property.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing between a settlement offer, an earnings order or seizure needs judgement about circumstances and is a formal council decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Interacting with customers and others using various communication methods to provide accurate information and deliver a positive customer experience
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles customers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 4112/01Source: “Interact with customers and others using various communication methods to provide accurate information and deliver a positive customer experience.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Customer conversations happen face to face in someone's home, where reassurance matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting annual housing reviews to ensure regulatory compliance
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: annual housing reviews, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 4112/01Source: “Conduct annual housing reviews to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Annual housing reviews usually mean visiting the property, with the written compliance check the simpler part.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Resolving problems with tax returns in consultation with taxpayers or their representatives
staying humanThe rules require a named, qualified person to answer for problems, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 4112/03Source: “Resolve problems with tax returns in consultation with taxpayers or their representatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Sorting out a disputed return means a real conversation with the taxpayer, and the settlement reached is a formal decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Securing a taxpayer's agreement to settle a tax assessment
staying humanThe rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a taxpayer's agreement, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 4112/03Source: “Secure a taxpayer's agreement to settle a tax assessment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a taxpayer to agree a settlement depends on a live negotiation, and the agreement itself is a formal one.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating potentially fraudulent claims
staying humanThe rules require a named, qualified person to answer for fraudulent claims, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 4112/01Source: “Investigate potentially fraudulent claims.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software flags suspicious patterns, but proving a claim is fraudulent needs private evidence and a decision an accountable officer takes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing housekeeping services
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: services, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 4112/02Source: “Oversee housekeeping services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Overseeing housekeeping means checking standards on site as well as organising rotas.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing disciplinary actions across departments to maintain housing standards
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles disciplinary actions across departments and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Manage disciplinary actions across departments to maintain housing standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Disciplinary action needs careful handling of people and a person accountable for the outcome.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Demonstrating proactive decision-making and good judgment in dealing with challenges
staying humanThe ratings behind this row put proactive well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 4112/01Source: “Demonstrate proactive decision-making and good judgment in dealing with challenges, seeking advice when necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Judgement calls in the moment rest on local knowledge and on personal responsibility for the outcome.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Advising individuals on financial problems for financial stability
staying humanThe rules require a named, qualified person to answer for individuals, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Advise individuals on financial problems for financial stability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Money advice in the UK is regulated and depends on trust, so software can only prepare information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating with private and voluntary sector organisations
staying humanThe value here is that a specific person handles private and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 4112/02Source: “Coordinate with private and voluntary sector organisations, contractors, and other local councils on partnership projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Joint working with councils and contractors depends on named people negotiating and following through together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Routinelying inspect grounds, facilities and equipment to determine the necessity of repairs or maintenance
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: inspect grounds, facilities and equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 4112/02Source: “Routinely inspect grounds, facilities, and equipment to determine the necessity of repairs or maintenance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Walking the grounds to spot what needs fixing means eyes on the buildings themselves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising the work of cleaning staff to ensure maintenance of standards
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: the work of cleaning staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 4112/02Source: “Supervise the work of cleaning staff to ensure maintenance of standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising cleaning staff means being on site with them and holding standards in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Holding regular meetings with each assigned unit
staying humanThis work happens in the physical world: regular meetings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 4112/02Source: “Hold regular meetings with each assigned unit.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence, and it moved between repeat runs, so the range is widened.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Regular unit meetings are about being in the room with residents who live there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
What this job pays, and how many people do it
- Median pay
- £30,900a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
- People doing this job
- 156,600in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.
Why this is shifting
The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: public enquiries in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: arranging meetings and responding to public enquiries. What it cannot do is be answerable: applicants need a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.
Your move
Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend
The exposed part of your job is the biggest part, and I am not going to dress that up: arranging meetings is work today's tools do quickly and cheaply, and that is not coming back.
So, given all that: 51% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 23% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 26% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 78 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.
What you have that the software does not is interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications, plus the years of knowing when something looks wrong before you can say why. That is the raw material for everything below.
This week: one thing
Sit on the machine's side of the desk. Pick one real piece of public enquiries you would normally do yourself, let whatever software you already have take the first pass at it, and then go through what it produced and write down every single thing it got wrong. One evening this week. Do not fix anything yet. Just catch it.
- What you end up holding
- a written list of the machine’s mistakes, in your handwriting
- How long it takes
- an evening, or an hour if you pick one job rather than one client
If you can’t run software on your employer’s or your clients’ data: Do the same hunt on paper. Take one printed piece of public enquiries, work through it the way you always do, and mark every point where you made a call rather than followed a rule. Same evening, same list, nothing to log into and nobody to ask permission from. That list is the same artifact: it is the judgment written down.
Over the next 90 days
Change one sentence about what you do. Not on a CV. Out loud, to whoever pays you. From “my job is arranging meetings” to “I check what the software does and tell you what it means.” Your error list from this week is what makes that sentence true instead of a claim, so use it: show it once, to one person, inside the next ninety days. Same skills, priced as judgment rather than as typing.
Over the next 12 months
Walk toward the end of this job that answers for things, and get it recognised. Pick the one part of interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications you are already best at, and spend the year making it formal: a qualification, a named responsibility, a specialism people ask for by name. Price it honestly: that is evenings, it is months rather than weeks, and the seats are competitive because everyone in your position is looking at the same door. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.
The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them
I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.
I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to local government administrative occupations (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was national government administrative occupations: only about 28% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 51/49: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “evaluate recorded data to determine eligibility status”, and let the exposed end go.
How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.
3 moves I checked and rejected
These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.
National government administrative occupations
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “interview and investigate applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 28% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: It is closer than most, and still not close enough: about 28% of that job's durable work is already yours, against the 35% I want to see before I will call something a route.
Financial administrative occupations n.e.c.
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “interview and investigate applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 18% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 18% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 58% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (62/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it.
Public services associate professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “interview and investigate applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 10% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 10% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.
What I’d stop worrying about
A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.
The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 51% of its task weight, across 78 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
“It’s too late for me to become something else”
You are not starting from zero, and the page shows why: interviewing and investigating applicants for public support to gather information pertinent to their applications is work the software cannot do and you already do it. The move above is a repricing of what you know, not a new career. Nobody who has just left college has that.
“I should learn to code”
Almost certainly not. The value in your job is moving toward checking, deciding and answering for the output, not toward writing the software. A weekend of Python will not change your position; the error list from this week will.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.
You are reading the United Kingdom figures
There is no counterpart mapped for this job in the other country, so there is nothing to switch to. That is a gap in the mapping, not a statement about the job.
Your route through this
Two honest options, and no deadline on either
Free, and complete
The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.
In England:
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
In Wales:
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded
A nearby route
There's no Space built for local government administrators yet.
Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.
The closest match is Microsoft 365 Productivity Workers, a community for coordinators, administrators and team leads who run their working day in Outlook, Teams, meetings, files and task lists. It overlaps with the part of your job that is growing: the coordinating half of the job - casework queues, files, follow-ups and meeting actions - in the tools the council already pays for. If that overlap isn't you, the free route below covers the same ground.
- Problem: “My Outlook triage eats the first hour of every day”
- Problem: “My weekly Excel tracker is updated by copy/paste, and I don’t trust the numbers anymore”
Try Microsoft 365 Productivity Workers free →
7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.
After the trial it is a paid community, and you get identical data either way. If the overlap above is not your job, the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own.
Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for local government administrators launches. Nothing else.
That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.
We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.
No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.
Questions people ask about this job
- Will AI replace Local government administrative occupations?
- Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 78 official task statements scored for Local government administrative occupations (United Kingdom, SOC 4112), 51% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 57 out of 100 (range 51–63, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
- Which tasks in “Local government administrative occupations” can AI already do?
- The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Gather data and prepare reports to inform decision-making” (93/100, very high); “Order specific supplies required for the maintenance of facilities” (93/100, very high); “Check tax forms for correct names and National Insurance numbers” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
- Which tasks in “Local government administrative occupations” stay human?
- About 26% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Hold regular meetings with each assigned unit” (4/100, minimal); “Supervise the work of cleaning staff to ensure maintenance of standards” (6/100, minimal); “Routinely inspect grounds, facilities, and equipment to determine the necessity of repairs or maintenance” (8/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
- What should someone working in “Local government administrative occupations” do about AI?
- Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 51% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 26% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
- How is the AI exposure score for Local government administrative occupations calculated?
- Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 78 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.
Where these numbers come from
About the data on this page
- Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
- This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
- One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
- 21 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
- No cross-market counterpart is mapped for this occupation, so there is no US↔UK comparison on this page.
- Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.
- Task statements
- gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
- Task weights
- gaisi-index (relatedness)
- Scores
- Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
- Pay and employment
- ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))
Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.
The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.
The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.
Using these figures?
Cite this
Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.
Plain text
Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).
BibTeX
@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
title = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
author = {{Collab365}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
note = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published . Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.