Will AI replace Management consultants and business analysts?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 159 official task statements scored for Management consultants and business analysts (United Kingdom, SOC 2431), 47% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 55 out of 100 (range 49–61, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Management consultants and business analysts” stay human?

About 29% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Inspect new and existing fire protection and detection systems to ensure proper operation” (0/100, minimal); “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used” (0/100, minimal); “Work with clients' representatives and health and safety inspectors to ensure compliance” (9/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Management consultants and business analysts” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 47% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 29% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Management consultants and business analysts calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 159 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Management consultants and business analysts

collecting business intelligence data from available industry reports, reviewing forms and reports to identify problems and improvements and forecasting and monitoring market trends. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: collecting business intelligence data from available industry reports is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 47%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 29%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 55 out of 100 (49–61 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 159 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for management consultants and business analysts is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. The ledger below shows which rows you can move toward.

Your week, as this page understands it

Management consultants and business analysts advise industrial, commercial and other establishments on a variety of management and business-related matters to assist in the formulation of financial and business policies in order to maximise growth or improve business performance. The job title says “management consultants” or “business analysts”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But management consultants and business analysts is not one task. It is 159 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 47%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 29%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
38 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

81 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Collecting business intelligence data from available industry reports
This is reading one thing and writing another: business intelligence data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/01
Source: “Collect business intelligence data from available industry reports, public information, field reports, or purchased sources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering business intelligence from reports and published sources is collection work software does quickly and thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing market trends to compare products and assess competitor strategies
This is reading one thing and writing another: market trends in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/01
Source: “Analyse market trends to compare products and assess competitor strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing products and competitor strategies uses widely available published information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting data analysis to identify trends and insights relevant to the business sector
This is reading one thing and writing another: data analysis in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Conduct data analysis to identify trends and insights relevant to the business sector.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding trends in data is a well-documented analytical job software performs to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing and classifying risks and investments to assess their potential impacts on companies
This is reading one thing and writing another: risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Analyse and classify risks and investments to assess their potential impacts on companies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Classifying risks and investments is well-documented analysis with abundant reference material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

35 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Using systems concepts and models to understand problem contexts and identifying information gaps
The software now makes the first pass at systems concepts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Use systems concepts and models to understand problem contexts and identify information gaps.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling a problem and spotting information gaps can be part drafted, though framing it well needs experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing clear communication objectives and leading effective communications to achieve desired outcomes
The software now makes the first pass at clear communication objectives, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Establish clear communication objectives and lead effective communications to achieve desired outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Communications can be written for you, but leading them well depends on how people receive the messenger.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using systems tools and models to identify and develop systemic intervention options
The software now makes the first pass at systems tools, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Use systems tools and models to identify and develop systemic intervention options.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling options can be part drafted, though choosing the right intervention needs experience of the situation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

43 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Discussing challenges and opportunities with decision-makers to define the initial scope of work
The value here is that a specific person handles challenges and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Discuss challenges and opportunities with decision-makers to define the initial scope of work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Agreeing what a piece of work should cover happens in a live conversation with the people paying for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Codesigning a stakeholder engagement strategy considering political and power dynamics
The value here is that a specific person handles a stakeholder engagement strategy considering political and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Co-design a stakeholder engagement strategy considering political and power dynamics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Engagement plans can be drafted, but reading the politics of an organisation comes from being in it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing specific engagement activities to gather information and explore multiple perspectives
The value here is that a specific person handles specific engagement activities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Design specific engagement activities to gather information and explore multiple perspectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Activities can be designed on paper, but drawing out different views depends on people in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 149 tasks

Identifying current and potential customers using business intelligence tools
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current and potential customers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Identify current and potential customers using business intelligence tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding current and potential customers in business data is exactly what these tools and software are for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports on operational results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Prepare reports on operational results, financial performance, and goal accomplishments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning operational and financial data into a performance report is highly automatable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing functional or technical documentation for data warehouses
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: functional in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Prepare functional or technical documentation for data warehouses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical documentation written from a known data model is writing software produces to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Typing detailed reports for business analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Type detailed reports for business analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing detailed written reports from analysis is routine drafting software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining library of model documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: library of model documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Maintain library of model documents, templates, or other reusable knowledge assets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Maintaining a library of templates and reusable documents is routine organising work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing staff handbooks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: staff handbooks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2431/02
Source: “Prepare staff handbooks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Staff handbooks reuse well established policy wording, so software produces strong drafts that only need company-specific edits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Gathering risk-related data from internal or external resources
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risk-related data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Gather risk-related data from internal or external resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling risk data together from internal and external sources is collection work software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specialist computer software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Use specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building spreadsheets and charts from data is well-automated office work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching new technologies and identifying opportunities for application within the business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new technologies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Research new technologies and identify opportunities for application within the business.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching new technology and where it might help is reading and summarising published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Visualizing processes, problems and opportunities using graphical and statistical analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: processes, problems and opportunities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Visualize processes, problems, and opportunities using graphical and statistical analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning processes and data into clear charts is well-documented work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing forms and reports to identify problems and improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: forms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Review forms and reports to identify problems and improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing forms and reports for problems is checking documents against well-known standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing and interpreting data to enhance understanding of human social behaviour
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Analyse and interpret data to enhance understanding of human social behaviour.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data about how people behave draws on well-published methods software applies well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating computer models to test possible business solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Create computer models to test possible business solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building computer models to test options is well-documented technical work software does strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing financial information to forecast business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Analyse financial information to forecast business, industry, or economic conditions and guide investment decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Forecasting from financial and economic data draws on abundant published material AI handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing algorithms based on statistical modelling procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: algorithms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Develop algorithms based on statistical modelling procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Statistical modelling is well documented with abundant reference material, so software writes and tests these algorithms strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using data analysis tools to process or produce reliable analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data analysis tools in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Use data analysis tools to process or produce reliable analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Processing and interpreting data with analysis tools is a core strength of current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Forecasting and monitoring market trends
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: market trends in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Forecast and monitor market trends.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Forecasting and tracking market trends uses published data and well-documented methods.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Consulting financial literature to ensure use of the latest models or statistical techniques
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Consult financial literature to ensure use of the latest models or statistical techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping up with published models and statistical techniques is literature reading software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting data on price, yield and stability for investment programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Interpret data on price, yield, and stability for investment programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting price, yield and stability data is well-documented quantitative work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring developments in the fields of business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: developments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Monitor developments in the fields of business, finance, and economic theory.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following developments in business and economics is reading and summarising AI does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Tracking advancements in manufacturing technology to improve production processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: advancements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Track advancements in manufacturing technology to improve production processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following advances in manufacturing technology is reading and summarising published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching government legislation affecting the company
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: government legislation affecting the company in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Research government legislation affecting the company.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legislation is published and searchable, so software can research what affects the company.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Tracking technical updates on hazardous materials to manage associated risks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical updates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Track technical updates on hazardous materials to manage associated risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking published updates on hazardous materials is monitoring and summarising work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Drafting business proposals and creating presentations for client engagement
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business proposals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Draft business proposals and create presentations for client engagement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Proposals and slide decks follow familiar patterns software drafts well, with a partner approving them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing presentations for underwriters
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: presentations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Prepare presentations for underwriters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Preparing presentations for underwriters is document work following familiar formats.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports for insurance underwriters and surveyors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Prepare reports for insurance underwriters and surveyors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reports for underwriters and surveyors follow set formats software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting ideas through reports and presentations for review
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: ideas in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Present ideas through reports and presentations for review.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning ideas into reports and slides is drafting software does well, with a person reviewing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing financial and non-financial data on competitors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial and non-financial data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/01
Source: “Analyse financial and non-financial data on competitors, stakeholders, and market trends, and make recommendations for future action.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing competitor and market data and drawing out recommendations is desk analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing intelligence information to identify threats and opportunities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: intelligence information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Analyse intelligence information to identify threats and opportunities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing intelligence for threats and opportunities is pattern spotting in information already gathered.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing disaster recovery plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: disaster recovery plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Develop disaster recovery plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Disaster recovery plans follow published templates software can draft closely.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining business intelligence tools, databases, dashboards, systems and methods
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business intelligence tools, databases, dashboards, systems and methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Maintain business intelligence tools, databases, dashboards, systems, and methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Maintaining reporting tools and databases is technical work software already supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing emergency management plans for recovery decision making and communications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: emergency management plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Develop emergency management plans for recovery decision making and communications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Emergency plans follow well-established formats software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining emergency response plans and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: emergency response plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Maintain emergency response plans and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping response plans current is document maintenance software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing and creating technical design documentation to ensure accurate development of reporting solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical design documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Review and create technical design documentation to ensure accurate development of reporting solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design documentation can be drafted well, though checking it will produce the right result needs experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing existing business continuity plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business continuity plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Review existing business continuity plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing existing continuity plans is document checking against well-known good practice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining and updating IT applications and network systems blueprints for the organisation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: IT applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Maintain and update IT applications and network systems blueprints for the organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping system and network documentation current is document work software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing data to provide strategic business insights
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Analyse data to provide strategic business insights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data for business insight is squarely what current software is good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing data to pinpoint areas for improvement
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Collect and analyse data to pinpoint areas for improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Collecting figures and spotting where things could improve is analysis software handles from existing records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting investigative activities to provide comprehensive analysis and recommendations for business improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: investigative activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Document investigative activities to provide comprehensive analysis and recommendations for business improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up investigation work with analysis and recommendations is drafting from material already gathered.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning study of work problems and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: study of work problems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Plan study of work problems and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing a study of work problems is structured planning software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods, inventory control and cost
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Analyse organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods, inventory control, and cost.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing how work, information and costs flow through an organisation is analysis of records already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and organising information on problems or procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Collect and organise information on problems or procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and tidying up information about problems and procedures is exactly what software is good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending changes to business forms and reports for improved efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Recommend changes to business forms and reports for improved efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting better forms and reports is document work software does well from the existing versions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting data relevant to the organisation to inform strategic decisions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Collect data relevant to the organisation to inform strategic decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Collecting the organisation's own data for decisions is gathering work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing modifications to test or build plans based on data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: modifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Propose modifications to test or build plans based on data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting changes to test or build plans follows directly from analysing the results already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending purchases of new equipment to enhance operational capabilities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: purchases of new equipment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/02
Source: “Recommend purchases of new equipment to enhance operational capabilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing equipment options and writing a recommendation is research and drafting software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing records management processes and policies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records management processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2431/02
Source: “Develop records management processes and policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Records policies follow well-established patterns, so software can draft them around the organisation's own needs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Outlining findings and recommending improvements based on analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Outline findings and recommend improvements based on analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up findings and recommendations from analysis is drafting software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating presentations to communicate findings to clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: presentations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Create presentations to communicate findings to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning findings into a clear client deck is well within what software produces.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining input or data quality of risk management systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: input in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Maintain input or data quality of risk management systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping risk system data clean and consistent is structured work that software already handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing and interpreting new regulations to ensure company compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Review and interpret new regulations to ensure company compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading new regulations and working out what they require is document work with abundant published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting statistical analyses to quantify risk using statistical analysis software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical analyses in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Conduct statistical analyses to quantify risk using statistical analysis software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Quantifying risk with statistical software uses well documented methods and abundant reference material, so much of it can be automated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Evaluating and comparing the relative quality of various securities in a given industry
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the relative quality of various securities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Evaluate and compare the relative quality of various securities in a given industry.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing securities within an industry uses abundant published data and standard methods, so software does much of the analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing a bank's market position and running figures through complex modelling techniques to find value at risk
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a bank's market position in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Analyse a bank's market position and running figures through complex modelling techniques to find value at risk (VAR) measurements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Value at risk modelling uses published techniques and market figures software handles accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assessing the risks related to green investments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Assess the risks related to green investments, such as renewable energy company shares.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing risks in green investments uses published data and well-documented analysis methods.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing technical expertise in advanced and complex lean and six sigma
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical expertise in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/01
Source: “Provide technical expertise in advanced and complex lean and six sigma, project, and change management principles and tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Improvement and project management methods are thoroughly documented, so software can explain and apply them competently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reading literature and participating in educational offerings related to new technologies in disaster recovery
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Read literature and participate in educational offerings related to new technologies in disaster recovery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading up on new recovery technology is summarising published material, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing product specifications considering key risk factors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: product specifications considering key risk factors in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Develop product specifications considering key risk factors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing product specifications with the risks considered is structured document work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing technical reports of findings based on synthesised analyses of test results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical reports of findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Prepare technical reports of findings based on synthesised analyses of test results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up test results into a technical report is drafting from data already produced.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying potential risks to an organisation's assets and earning capacity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: potential risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Identify potential risks to an organisation's assets and earning capacity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Identifying threats to an organisation's assets and earnings uses documented methods and internal data, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the severity of financial risks by conducting targeted research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the severity of financial risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Assess the severity of financial risks by conducting targeted research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching and grading financial risks is analysis from information already available.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating how specific changes will affect profitability
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: how specific changes will affect profitability in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Evaluate how specific changes will affect profitability, value, or income.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out how a change affects profit or income is financial modelling software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Measuring aspects of market risk for traded issues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: aspects of market risk in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Measure aspects of market risk for traded issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Market risk measures use published methods and market data, so calculating and reporting them is well suited to software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing reports outlining findings and explaining risk positions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports outlining findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Produce reports outlining findings and explaining risk positions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk reports pull together system data in familiar formats, so software drafts them well for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing data, maintain records and producing reports on compliance and risk activities to ensure policies are being correctly
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data, maintain records and producing reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Analyse data, maintain records, and produce reports on compliance and risk activities to ensure policies are being correctly applied.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compliance records and reports follow set formats and sit in systems software reads easily, so drafting them is largely a desk job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Devising scenario analyses reflecting possible severe market events
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scenario analyses reflecting possible severe market events in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Devise scenario analyses reflecting possible severe market events.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Stress scenarios use published methods and market history, so software can devise and run them convincingly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using financial software and packages
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Use financial software and packages, including portfolio management software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Operating financial and portfolio software is the kind of structured task software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Regularlying review risk policies to ensure compliance with relevant new legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: review risk policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Regularly review risk policies to ensure compliance with relevant new legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing policies against new legislation is reading and comparison work software does quickly and reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing impact on and risk
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: impact in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Analyse impact on, and risk to, essential business functions to identify acceptable recovery time periods and resource requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out which functions matter most and how fast they must recover is structured analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing timely flow of business intelligence information to users
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: flow of business intelligence information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Manage timely flow of business intelligence information to users.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Getting the right information to the right users on time is reporting work software manages well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing plans for continuity of critical departmental processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Develop plans for continuity of critical departmental processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Continuity plans for a department follow well-known formats software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering technical support for the maintenance and use of reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical support in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Offer technical support for the maintenance and use of reports, dashboards, and tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Supporting users of reports and dashboards is largely answering documented questions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing, maintaining or testing call trees to ensure appropriate communication during disaster
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: call trees in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Establish, maintain, or test call trees to ensure appropriate communication during disaster.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up and testing emergency contact lists is routine administrative work software manages well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Sharing updates on tools, reports and metadata enhancements with relevant stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: updates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Share updates on tools, reports, and metadata enhancements with relevant stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sharing updates on tools and reports is routine written communication.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering training and awareness materials to enhance knowledge
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: awareness materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2431/01
Source: “Administer training and awareness materials to enhance knowledge.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing and issuing awareness material is drafting and distribution software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research to understand the organisation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Conduct research to understand the organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching how an organisation works draws on documents and records software can review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording key risks and ensuring their communication
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: key risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Record key risks and ensure their communication.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording risks and making sure people hear about them is register work software handles, with light human chasing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Building resilience into data products against business continuity and disaster recovery plans
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at resilience, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Build resilience into data products against business continuity and disaster recovery plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing data products to survive disruption is technical work software can support but not settle.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying organisational issues to improve business efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisational issues, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Identify organisational issues to improve business efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can surface likely problems, but identifying what really holds this organisation back needs judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Forming hypotheses and solutions for management consultancy projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at hypotheses, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Form hypotheses and solutions for management consultancy projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software generates plausible ideas, though testing and choosing between them needs consultant judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing boundaries and assumptions of conceptual models
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at boundaries, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Review boundaries and assumptions of conceptual models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking a model's boundaries and assumptions is analytical review software can support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing plans of action for investment using financial analyses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans of action, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Prepare plans of action for investment using financial analyses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investment action plans built from financial analysis are drafting and modelling work software does well for a specialist to finalise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or drafting risk disclosures for offer documents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risk disclosures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Review or draft risk disclosures for offer documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Risk disclosure drafting reuses well-established wording, though what goes into an offer document is signed off by the firm's advisers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing clients about project progress and discussing any arising issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Inform clients about project progress and discuss any arising issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress updates are easily drafted, though clients want to raise issues with a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying strategies to mitigate risks from regulatory changes affecting business continuity
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Identify strategies to mitigate risks from regulatory changes affecting business continuity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulatory changes can be researched, but working out what they mean for this business needs judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing risk-assessment methodologies to identify and mitigate potential risks
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risk-assessment methodologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Implement risk-assessment methodologies to identify and mitigate potential risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Applying risk assessment methods is documented desk work, so software drafts the assessments for a specialist to refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing potential environmental impacts of production process changes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at potential environmental impacts of production process changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Analyse potential environmental impacts of production process changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental impact analysis of process changes follows documented methods with data from company systems, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the risks and benefits involved in implementing green building technologies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the risks, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2431/03
Source: “Assess the risks and benefits involved in implementing green building technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Green building options can be researched, but judging them for a specific project needs expertise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and delivering improvement opportunities aligned to key business goals using advanced analysis techniques
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at improvement opportunities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2431/01
Source: “Identify and deliver improvement opportunities aligned to key business goals using advanced analysis techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysis can point to improvements, but deciding which fit the business goals needs judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Mitigating issues and reporting progress to all relevant parties
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at issues, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Mitigate issues and report progress to all relevant parties.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reporting is easily drafted, though resolving the issues themselves involves colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing services to facilitate use of technology-based tools
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at services, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Implement services to facilitate use of technology-based tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rolling out services around new tools can be part automated, though adoption depends on the people using them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Continuouslying iterate and evolve the approach
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at iterate, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Continuously iterate and evolve the approach, scope, and plan as new data and insights emerge.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Adjusting scope and plans as things change can be drafted, but the calls need someone close to the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out or coordinating tests to ensure that intelligence is consistent with defined needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at or coordinating tests, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2431/01
Source: “Carry out or coordinate tests to ensure that intelligence is consistent with defined needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tests can be planned and results checked, though coordinating them involves colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing organisational changes to meet strategic objectives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisational changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Propose organisational changes to meet strategic objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Change proposals can be drafted from analysis, though the recommendation needs shaping by someone who knows the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conferring with management and users about format
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at management, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Confer with management and users about format, distribution, and purpose of forms and reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Requirements can be captured and drafted, but the useful detail comes from talking to the people using the forms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and communicating risks of specific trading strategies or positions with traders
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risks of specific trading strategies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Identify and communicate risks of specific trading strategies or positions with traders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining position risk to traders is fast, informal and relationship-driven, though the underlying numbers come straight from systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering client queries on risk exposure
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at client queries, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Answer client queries on risk exposure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining risk exposure to clients draws on system data software presents well, though clients expect a person to answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering client queries on market scenarios
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at client queries, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Answer client queries on market scenarios.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining market scenarios to clients is largely information work software drafts well, though clients still want a person answering.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing new business products to improve organisational efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new business products, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Develop new business products to improve organisational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: New internal products can be sketched by software, but developing them depends on the organisation's own knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting gateway assessments to ensure suitability of improvement projects to progress
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at gateway assessments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/01
Source: “Conduct gateway assessments to ensure suitability of improvement projects to progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gateway assessments follow set criteria, though the decision to let a project proceed rests with a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring successful functioning of newly implemented systems or procedures with concerned personnel
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at successful functioning of newly implemented systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Ensure successful functioning of newly implemented systems or procedures with concerned personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Bedding in a new system depends on working through snags with the people using it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Contributing to development of risk management systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at development of risk management systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Contribute to development of risk management systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a risk management framework draws on well documented practice, though it has to fit how the organisation actually works.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on legal and regulatory compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at legal, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Advise on legal and regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 41 out of 100 (34–48 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rules are published and searchable, but formal compliance advice has to come from an accountable professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Codesigning monitoring and evaluation processes for interventions and stakeholder participation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at evaluation processes, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Co-design monitoring and evaluation processes for interventions and stakeholder participation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Monitoring approaches can be drafted, but designing them with stakeholders is a live piece of work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing projects and programmes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at projects, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Manage projects and programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Plans and tracking can be automated, but running a programme depends on the people delivering it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting these options and recommendations to clients and senior management
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at these options, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Present these options and recommendations to clients and senior management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The options can be prepared by software, but presenting them to senior people is a live job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with clients to understand their needs and requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Engage with clients to understand their needs and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients explain what they actually need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting findings to clients to provide insights and recommendations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at findings, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Present findings to clients to provide insights and recommendations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Findings can be written up by software, but presenting them to a client is personal work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Facilitating decision-making by highlighting choices and trade-offs in systemic interventions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at highlighting choices, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Facilitate decision-making by highlighting choices and trade-offs in systemic interventions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Trade-offs can be laid out clearly, but helping people decide happens in conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting risk assessments to evaluate potential hazards and ensure safety
staying human
The ratings behind this row put risk assessments well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Conduct risk assessments to evaluate potential hazards and ensure safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk assessments follow documented methods, but judging real hazards usually means looking at the actual workplace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and reviewing risk and safety performance in accordance with established processes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put risk well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Monitor and review risk and safety performance in accordance with established processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing safety performance uses recorded data, though checking it properly means seeing the operation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing recovery plans to ensure resilience and sustainability after disruptive events
staying human
The ratings behind this row put recovery plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2431/01
Source: “Develop and implement recovery plans to ensure resilience and sustainability after disruptive events.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recovery plans can be drafted from known formats, though testing and running them involves people and places.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing collection of corporate intelligence to prevent fraud
staying human
The ratings behind this row put collection of corporate intelligence well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2431/01
Source: “Oversee collection of corporate intelligence to prevent fraud, financial crime, cyber attacks, terrorism, and infrastructure failure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Intelligence gathering can be part automated, but overseeing sensitive work needs an accountable person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing advice and guidance to the business on compliance and risk requirements
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for advice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Provide advice and guidance to the business on compliance and risk requirements, such as data security and financial crime, using knowledge of the financial services legal and regulatory framework.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Compliance advice in financial services has to come from someone the regulator holds accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending strategies to reduce or control risk
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for strategies, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2431/03
Source: “Recommend strategies to reduce or control risk, including potential insurance solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recommending risk and insurance solutions is regulated advice a qualified person must give.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Purchasing insurance policies to mitigate organisational risks
staying human
The ratings behind this row put insurance policies well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Purchase insurance policies to mitigate organisational risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Arranging company insurance is comparison and paperwork software supports, though placing cover involves negotiation with brokers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Applying collaborative futures thinking techniques to identify future challenges and opportunities for the organisation
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles collaborative futures thinking techniques and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Apply collaborative futures thinking techniques to identify future challenges and opportunities for the organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Futures work can be prepared on paper, but the value comes from people thinking together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing systemic intervention approach and supporting decision-makers to develop an intervention plan
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles systemic intervention approach and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Design systemic intervention approach and support decision-makers to develop an intervention plan.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: An approach can be drafted, but supporting decision-makers to commit to it is personal work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing initial conceptual models to identify stakeholder enquiry needs and potential value conflicts
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles initial conceptual models and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Develop initial conceptual models to identify stakeholder enquiry needs and potential value conflicts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Early models can be sketched, but understanding what stakeholders really want comes from talking to them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assisting businesses in implementing strategic plans
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles businesses and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2431/02
Source: “Assist businesses in implementing strategic plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Plans can be drafted, but helping a business actually adopt them depends on working alongside people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Advising clients on risk management and strategies to mitigate risks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles clients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2431/03
Source: “Advise clients on risk management and strategies to mitigate risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Risk advice draws on well documented methods, but clients buy the adviser's judgement and relationship as much as the analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising clients on how to reduce the risk of future insurance claims
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles clients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Advise clients on how to reduce the risk of future insurance claims.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Claims advice can be drafted, but clients act on it because of the adviser they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with underwriters and brokers to manage insurance policies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles underwriters and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Collaborate with underwriters and brokers to manage insurance policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Managing policies with underwriters and brokers runs on established relationships.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending or implementing methods
staying human
The ratings behind this row put methods well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Recommend or implement methods to monitor, evaluate, or enable resolution of safety, operations, or compliance interruptions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring methods can be recommended from documented practice, though implementing them needs someone accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Reviewing building plans for compliance with safety regulations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2431/03
Source: “Review building plans for compliance with safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Plans can be checked against published rules, though approval rests with a qualified building control professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training workers in use of new forms
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles workers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2431/02
Source: “Train workers in use of new forms, reports, procedures, or equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training materials can be produced by software, but teaching people to use new kit happens in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting investment appraisals and providing tailored investment advice to clients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for investment appraisals, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Conduct investment appraisals and provide tailored investment advice to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Corporate investment appraisal is analysis software handles well; because advice to clients is expected from a qualified adviser, a person stays responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on workplace health risks
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for workplace health risks, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2431/03
Source: “Advise on workplace health risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Health advice at work needs a qualified person who has seen the workplace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing emergency management and contingency planning
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles emergency management and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2431/03
Source: “Direct emergency management and contingency planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contingency plans can be drafted well from published guidance, but directing a real emergency needs someone people will follow.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working on multiple simultaneous projects linked to key business objectives
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles multiple simultaneous projects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2431/01
Source: “Work on multiple simultaneous projects linked to key business objectives, identifying and engaging subject matter experts and key stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running several projects at once depends on knowing and engaging the right people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Staying abreast of industry trends by communicating with customers and suppliers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles abreast of industry trends and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Stay abreast of industry trends by communicating with customers and suppliers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Learning what is changing from customers and suppliers depends on the relationships behind those conversations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Consulting with staff to understand workplace issues
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Consult with staff to understand workplace issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding workplace issues depends on staff being willing to speak openly to a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Interviewing other stakeholders to collect diverse perspectives
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles other stakeholders and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Interview other stakeholders to collect diverse perspectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing stakeholders relies on a live conversation and on people opening up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing the work of systems and business analysts
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the work of systems and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/02
Source: “Direct the work of systems and business analysts, developers, and support specialists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (18–26 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing specialists depends on their trust in the person leading the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with clients to understand their specific needs and preferences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Consult with clients to understand their specific needs and preferences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Questions can be scripted, but customers explain what they want in conversation with a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Protecting the organisation's assets and public image
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the organisation's assets and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/03
Source: “Protect the organisation's assets and public image.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (8–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Protecting assets and reputation rests on judgement calls and relationships a person has to own.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coaching and supporting improvement specialists in implementing improvement projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles improvement specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/01
Source: “Coach and support improvement specialists in implementing improvement projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coaching improvement specialists works through an ongoing personal relationship, not a document.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting stakeholders in reaching consensus on strategies and policies for future planning
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles stakeholders and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2431/02
Source: “Support stakeholders in reaching consensus on strategies and policies for future planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting people to agree on a strategy depends on trust built in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting interviews with staff and managers about their job responsibilities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles interviews and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Conduct interviews with staff and managers about their job responsibilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing staff about their jobs depends on a live conversation and on people being willing to talk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Interviewing the client's employees to gather relevant information
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the client's employees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Interview the client's employees to gather relevant information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing a client's employees means being there and earning enough trust for honest answers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Facilitating ethical and safe stakeholder engagement and dialogue
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles ethical and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Facilitate ethical and safe stakeholder engagement and dialogue.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Safe, honest dialogue between stakeholders depends on a facilitator people trust in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Assisting decision-makers in exploring and negotiating intervention ethics with stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles decision-makers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Assist decision-makers in exploring and negotiating intervention ethics with stakeholders, addressing value conflicts and power dynamics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working through value conflicts and power struggles depends on trust with the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Moderating focus groups to gather targeted feedback
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles focus groups and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2431/02
Source: “Moderate focus groups to gather targeted feedback.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a focus group depends on reading and steering a live group of people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles activities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2431/01, 2431/02
Source: “Facilitate activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational, social, or socio-ecological system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building a shared picture with a group depends on facilitating people live.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Leading workshops
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles workshops and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2431/02
Source: “Lead workshops.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading a workshop is live work with a room full of people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Providing valuations for commercial and residential developments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: valuations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2431/03
Source: “Provide valuations for commercial and residential developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Valuations require inspecting the property and a qualified valuer signing the figure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Working with clients' representatives and health and safety inspectors to ensure compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clients' representatives, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2431/03
Source: “Work with clients' representatives and health and safety inspectors to ensure compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with inspectors on site involves being there and answering for what they find.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site observation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2431/02
Source: “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Watching equipment and staff at work requires being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Inspecting new and existing fire protection and detection systems to ensure proper operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: new and existing fire protection and detection systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2431/03
Source: “Inspect new and existing fire protection and detection systems to ensure proper operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking that fire systems actually work requires testing them on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £53,300a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 245,700in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: business intelligence data in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: collecting business intelligence data from available industry reports and analysing market trends to compare products and assess competitor strategies. What it cannot do is be trusted in person, which is what activities run on: someone specific doing it and standing behind it. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

The exposed part of your job is the biggest part, and I am not going to dress that up: collecting business intelligence data from available industry reports is work today's tools do quickly and cheaply, and that is not coming back.

So, given all that: 47% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 24% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 29% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 159 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

What you have that the software does not is facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational, plus the years of knowing when something looks wrong before you can say why. That is the raw material for everything below.

This week: one thing

Sit on the machine's side of the desk. Pick one real piece of business intelligence data you would normally do yourself, let whatever software you already have take the first pass at it, and then go through what it produced and write down every single thing it got wrong. One evening this week. Do not fix anything yet. Just catch it.

What you end up holding: a written list of the machine’s mistakes, in your handwriting
How long it takes: an evening, or an hour if you pick one job rather than one client

If you can’t run software on your employer’s or your clients’ data: Do the same hunt on paper. Take one printed piece of business intelligence data, work through it the way you always do, and mark every point where you made a call rather than followed a rule. Same evening, same list, nothing to log into and nobody to ask permission from. That list is the same artifact: it is the judgment written down.

Over the next 90 days

Change one sentence about what you do. Not on a CV. Out loud, to whoever pays you. From “my job is collecting business intelligence data from available industry reports” to “I check what the software does and tell you what it means.” Your error list from this week is what makes that sentence true instead of a claim, so use it: show it once, to one person, inside the next ninety days. Same skills, priced as judgment rather than as typing.

Over the next 12 months

Walk toward the end of this job that answers for things, and get it recognised. Pick the one part of facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational you are already best at, and spend the year making it formal: a qualification, a named responsibility, a specialism people ask for by name. Price it honestly: that is evenings, it is months rather than weeks, and the seats are competitive because everyone in your position is looking at the same door. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to management consultants and business analysts (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was business and financial project management professionals: only about 6% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 47/53: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “discuss challenges and opportunities with decision-makers to define the initial scope of…”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Business and financial project management professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “identify and communicate risks of specific trading strategies or positions with traders”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 6% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 6% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Actuaries, economists and statisticians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “assist businesses in implementing strategic plans”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 62% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (64/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Financial managers and directors
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already analyse and classify risks and investments to assess their potential impacts on companies, and their equivalent is to assess companies as investments for clients by examining company facilities. Across both published task lists that is about 3% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 47% of its task weight, across 159 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
“It’s too late for me to become something else”
You are not starting from zero, and the page shows why: facilitating activities to build shared systemic models of the focused organisational is work the software cannot do and you already do it. The move above is a repricing of what you know, not a new career. Nobody who has just left college has that.
“I should learn to code”
Almost certainly not. The value in your job is moving toward checking, deciding and answering for the output, not toward writing the software. A weekend of Python will not change your position; the error list from this week will.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Logisticians is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Management Analysts

In US official statistics this job is counted as Logisticians and Management Analysts. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Two honest options, and no deadline on either

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

A guided route for this

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Microsoft 365 Report Builders is built for business analysts, reporting leads and Excel power users who are responsible for business reports without a dedicated data team (the people this page is about). It works on the part of your job that is growing rather than shrinking: the analysis and the report that carries it: clean data, defined measures, and a dashboard that still matches the business next month.

Try Microsoft 365 Report Builders free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

After the trial it is a paid community, and you get identical data either way. If the overlap above is not your job, the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for management consultants and business analysts launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Management consultants and business analysts?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 159 official task statements scored for Management consultants and business analysts (United Kingdom, SOC 2431), 47% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 55 out of 100 (range 49–61, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Management consultants and business analysts” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Collect business intelligence data from available industry reports, public information, field reports, or purchased sources” (93/100, very high); “Identify current and potential customers using business intelligence tools” (93/100, very high); “Prepare reports on operational results, financial performance, and goal accomplishments” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Management consultants and business analysts” stay human?: About 29% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Inspect new and existing fire protection and detection systems to ensure proper operation” (0/100, minimal); “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used” (0/100, minimal); “Work with clients' representatives and health and safety inspectors to ensure compliance” (9/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Management consultants and business analysts” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 47% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 29% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Management consultants and business analysts calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 159 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
38 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.