Will AI replace Business and financial project management professionals?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 160 official task statements scored for Business and financial project management professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2440), 40% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 48 out of 100 (range 42–55, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

What should someone working in “Business and financial project management professionals” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 40% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 35% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

UK dataswitch to US

Business and financial project management professionals

analysing data to facilitate organisational change, utilising clinical systems, such as esource and assessing and communicating financial and non-financial benefits of improvement projects. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: using specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and dispensing trial medications to study participants is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 40%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 35%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 48 out of 100 (42–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 160 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for business and financial project management professionals is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. Moving toward the second half is a real, doable plan.

Your week, as this page understands it

Business and financial project management professionals manage and oversee major projects across all sectors of modern industry, commerce and the public sector, in areas such as e-commerce, business analysis, finance, product development, marketing, human resources. The job title says “business” or “financial project management professionals”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: dispensing trial medications to study participants. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But business and financial project management professionals is not one task. It is 160 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is dispensing trial medications to study participants, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 40%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 35%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
13 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

66 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Analysing data to facilitate organisational change
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2440/01
Source: “Analyse data to facilitate organisational change.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data to support change is desk work software does well using the organisation's own figures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing data to pinpoint areas for improvement
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2440/01
Source: “Collect and analyse data to pinpoint areas for improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Collecting figures and spotting where things could improve is analysis software handles from existing records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records accurate is routine screen work software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and classifying risks and investments to assess their potential impacts on companies
This is reading one thing and writing another: risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Analyse and classify risks and investments to assess their potential impacts on companies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Classifying risks and investments is well-documented analysis with abundant reference material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

38 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Identifying protocol issues in clinical trials to ensure compliance and accuracy
The software now makes the first pass at protocol issues, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Identify protocol issues in clinical trials to ensure compliance and accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting where a trial has drifted from its protocol is document checking, though a qualified person signs it off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting risk assessments and developing strategies
The software now makes the first pass at risk assessments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2440/03
Source: “Conduct risk assessments and develop strategies to manage, mitigate, and transfer risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk assessments follow known methods, but judging this organisation's real exposure needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing clinical trial protocols
The software now makes the first pass at clinical trial protocols, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Develop and implement clinical trial protocols.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Trial protocols can be part drafted from templates, but a qualified researcher has to stand behind them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

56 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Screening potential subjects to determine their suitability as study participants
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for potential subjects, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Screen potential subjects to determine their suitability as study participants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Screening records against entry criteria is structured checking, though a clinician confirms who is suitable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and implementing strategies to enhance business operational efficiency
The value here is that a specific person handles strategies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2440/01
Source: “Identify and implement strategies to enhance business operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Ideas for efficiency are easy to generate, but the useful detail sits inside the business and change needs people on side.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Advising clients on risk management and strategies to mitigate risks
The value here is that a specific person handles clients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2440/03
Source: “Advise clients on risk management and strategies to mitigate risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Risk advice can be drafted, but clients act on it because they trust the adviser.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 150 tasks

Writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports are written from information already recorded, which software does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specialist computer software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Use specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building spreadsheets and charts from data is well-automated office work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Gathering risk-related data from internal or external resources
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risk-related data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Gather risk-related data from internal or external resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling risk data together from internal and external sources is collection work software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting data analysis to identify trends and insights relevant to the business sector
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data analysis in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/01
Source: “Conduct data analysis to identify trends and insights relevant to the business sector.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding trends in data is a well-documented analytical job software performs to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing forms and reports to identify problems and improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: forms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Review forms and reports to identify problems and improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing forms and reports for problems is checking documents against well-known standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Staying informed about trends and changes in the business world
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: informed in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2440/01
Source: “Stay informed about trends and changes in the business world.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping up with business news is reading and summarising, which software does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching markets to identify new business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: markets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2440/01
Source: “Research markets to identify new business.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Market research to find new business draws on published information software can gather and summarise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing scientific literature to maintain current knowledge of clinical studies affairs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scientific literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Review scientific literature to maintain current knowledge of clinical studies affairs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading and summarising published research is one of the things software does best.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing financial information to forecast business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Analyse financial information to forecast business, industry, or economic conditions and guide investment decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Forecasting from financial and economic data draws on abundant published material AI handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting data on price, yield and stability for investment programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Interpret data on price, yield, and stability for investment programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting price, yield and stability data is well-documented quantitative work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Consulting financial literature to ensure use of the latest models or statistical techniques
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Consult financial literature to ensure use of the latest models or statistical techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping up with published models and statistical techniques is literature reading software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Keeping abreast of advances in technology
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: abreast of advances in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Keep abreast of advances in technology, developments in the Electronics sector and new regulatory and compliance requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping up with technology and regulation is reading and summarising published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring developments in the fields of business
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: developments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Monitor developments in the fields of business, finance, and economic theory.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following developments in business and economics is reading and summarising AI does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Understanding the structure, purposes and operations of the chosen industrial sector
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the structure in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Understand the structure, purposes, and operations of the chosen industrial sector.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Understanding how a sector works draws on published material software can gather and explain.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing staff handbooks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: staff handbooks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2440/01
Source: “Prepare staff handbooks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Staff handbooks follow standard content software drafts well, with a person checking the legal wording.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring enrolment status of subjects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: enrolment status of subjects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Monitor enrolment status of subjects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking how many participants have joined is record keeping software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing algorithms based on statistical modelling procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: algorithms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Develop algorithms based on statistical modelling procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building statistical models in code is one of the strongest uses of current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods, inventory control and cost
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Analyse organisational change, communications, information flow, production methods, inventory control, and cost.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing how work, information and costs flow through an organisation is analysis of records already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and organising information on problems or procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/01
Source: “Collect and organise information on problems or procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and tidying up information about problems and procedures is exactly what software is good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring ongoing projects and evaluating their outcomes against predefined objectives
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/01
Source: “Monitor ongoing projects and evaluate their outcomes against predefined objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking projects against their objectives is monitoring of structured information software manages well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording investigative activities to facilitate effective organisational change management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: investigative activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/01
Source: “Record investigative activities to facilitate effective organisational change management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up what was investigated is documentation software produces reliably from the underlying notes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning study of work problems and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: study of work problems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Plan study of work problems and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing a study of work problems is structured planning software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending changes to business forms and reports for improved efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Recommend changes to business forms and reports for improved efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting better forms and reports is document work software does well from the existing versions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing modifications to test or build plans based on data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: modifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2440/01
Source: “Propose modifications to test or build plans based on data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting changes to test or build plans follows directly from analysing the results already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending purchases of new equipment to enhance operational capabilities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: purchases of new equipment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2440/01
Source: “Recommend purchases of new equipment to enhance operational capabilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing equipment options and writing a recommendation is research and drafting software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing records management processes and policies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records management processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2440/01
Source: “Develop records management processes and policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Records policies follow well-established patterns, so software can draft them around the organisation's own needs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying the appropriate contact within an organisation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the appropriate contact within an organisation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2440/01
Source: “Identify the appropriate contact within an organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding the right person to approach in an organisation is a search task software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating presentations to communicate findings to clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: presentations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Create presentations to communicate findings to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning findings into a clear client deck is well within what software produces.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining input or data quality of risk management systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: input in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Maintain input or data quality of risk management systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking and cleaning the data feeding a risk system is rule-based work software already does, with people watching for odd cases.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coding collected study data for analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: collected study data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Code collected study data for analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coding study data uses published dictionaries and set rules, which software applies well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Applying statistical principles, such as power and sampling size calculations, randomization and confidence intervals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical principles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Apply statistical principles, such as power and sample size calculations, randomization, and confidence intervals, in the analysis of clinical trial data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sample size and confidence calculations follow published statistical methods software applies accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing data collection forms, known as case report forms, CRFs)
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data collection forms, known in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Design data collection forms, known as case report forms (CRFs).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Case report forms follow well-established designs software can produce to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Devising scenario analyses reflecting possible severe market events
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scenario analyses reflecting possible severe market events in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Devise scenario analyses reflecting possible severe market events.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Stress and scenario methods are well documented and market data is plentiful, so software produces credible analyses for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting statistical analyses to quantify risk using statistical analysis software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical analyses in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Conduct statistical analyses to quantify risk using statistical analysis software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Statistical risk analysis uses published methods and software, which current tools handle accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Measuring aspects of market risk for traded issues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: aspects of market risk in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Measure aspects of market risk for traded issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Market risk measurement uses published methods and market data that software handles accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing technical expertise in advanced and complex lean and six sigma
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical expertise in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/01
Source: “Provide technical expertise in advanced and complex lean and six sigma, project, and change management principles and tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Improvement and project management methods are thoroughly documented, so software can explain and apply them competently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Recording key risks and ensuring their communication
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: key risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Record key risks and ensure their communication.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping a risk register up to date is structured record keeping, though people still need telling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing proposed study protocols to evaluate factors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: proposed study protocols in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Review proposed study protocols to evaluate factors such as sample collection processes, data management plans, or potential subject risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking a study protocol against published standards is document work software handles, with formal approval given elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting and reporting the gathered data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the gathered data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Interpret and report the gathered data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting collected data and writing it up is analysis and drafting software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining Trial Master Files, TMFs) and ensuring confidentiality and traceability of documentation in clinical trials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: trial master files in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Maintain Trial Master Files (TMFs) and ensure confidentiality and traceability of documentation in clinical trials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping trial files complete and traceable is document management software supports strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing protocol worksheets and procedural manuals for studies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: protocol worksheets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Prepare protocol worksheets and procedural manuals for studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Worksheets and procedure manuals follow set formats software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording dropout information, reasons and subject contact efforts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: dropout information, reasons and subject contact efforts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Record dropout information including reasons and subject contact efforts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording why participants dropped out is structured note keeping, though the contact itself involves a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Utilising clinical systems, such as esource, electronic medical records and econsent, to manage and analyse trial data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: clinical systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Utilise clinical systems, such as esource, electronic medical records, and econsent, to manage and analyse trial data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working within trial systems to manage and analyse data is what software is built for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Registering protocol patients with appropriate statistical centres
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: protocol patients in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Register protocol patients with appropriate statistical centres as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Registering patients with statistical centres is a routine administrative step.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing monetary disbursements for research activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: monetary disbursements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Manage monetary disbursements for research activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Managing research payments is finance administration software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing advertising and other informational materials to be used in participant recruitment
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: other informational materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/02
Source: “Develop advertising and other informational materials to be used in participant recruitment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recruitment leaflets and adverts are drafting work software does well, with ethics approval sought separately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing research budgets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/02
Source: “Manage research budgets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Managing a research budget is tracking and forecasting from figures already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Comparing estimated risks with organisational criteria
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: estimated risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Compare estimated risks with organisational criteria including costs, legal requirements, and environmental factors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing estimated risks against cost, legal and environmental criteria is structured analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying potential risks to an organisation's assets and earning capacity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: potential risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Identify potential risks to an organisation's assets and earning capacity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Identifying threats to an organisation's assets and earnings is analysis of information already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the organisation's previous handling of risks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the organisation's previous handling of risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Assess the organisation's previous handling of risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing how past risks were handled is analysis of records the organisation already keeps.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing plans of action for investment using financial analyses
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans of action in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Prepare plans of action for investment using financial analyses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investment plans are built from figures and documents software can work through, though a person still owns the final recommendation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or drafting risk disclosures for offer documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risk disclosures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Review or draft risk disclosures for offer documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk wording follows well-worn precedent that software drafts well, with the firm and its lawyers approving the final text.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making business continuity plans for risk management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business continuity plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Make business continuity plans for risk management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Continuity plans follow well-known formats software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing reports outlining findings and explaining risk positions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports outlining findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Produce reports outlining findings and explaining risk positions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up findings and explaining risk positions is drafting from analysis already done.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and delivering presentations and reports to communicate project progress and outcomes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: presentations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Develop and deliver presentations and reports to communicate project progress and outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports and slides are drafted well by software; delivering them still involves a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and communicating financial and non-financial benefits of improvement projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial and non-financial benefits of improvement projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/01
Source: “Assess and communicate financial and non-financial benefits of improvement projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out and writing up the benefits of a project is calculation and drafting from available figures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Possessing an in-depth knowledge of business support and the ability to advise businesses on the range of options available
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/01
Source: “Possess an in-depth knowledge of business support and the ability to advise businesses on the range of options available.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Business support options are well documented, so software can set out what is available and what fits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging external training for the team
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2440/01
Source: “Arrange external training for the team where appropriate.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding and booking suitable external training is routine arranging that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Scheduling and coordinating site visits with sponsors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: site visits in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Schedule and coordinate site visits with sponsors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Arranging visits with sponsors is scheduling and correspondence software manages well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Demonstrating scientific knowledge in the areas of physiology
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scientific knowledge in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Demonstrate scientific knowledge in the areas of physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, and genetics to effectively conduct clinical trials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The science behind trials is thoroughly published, so software can apply it, though a qualified person answers for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Evaluating and comparing the relative quality of various securities in a given industry
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the relative quality of various securities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Evaluate and compare the relative quality of various securities in a given industry.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Comparing published company figures suits software well, but a qualified analyst is expected to stand behind research clients act on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Regularlying review risk policies to ensure compliance with relevant new legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: review risk policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Regularly review risk policies to ensure compliance with relevant new legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking policies against new legislation is document comparison, though a responsible person approves the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Identifying improvement opportunities and scope projects for change
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at improvement opportunities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Identify improvement opportunities and scope projects for change.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can suggest improvement ideas, but scoping which are worth doing here needs local judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing new or modified operational strategies and business plans
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new or modified operational strategies and business plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2440/01
Source: “Prepare new or modified operational strategies and business plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Business plans can be drafted quickly, but the strategy inside them needs judgement about this organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering sponsors' questions about issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at sponsors' questions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Answer sponsors' questions about issues such as incomplete data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering sponsor questions about missing data is drafting from records already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating adverse event reports and ethics committee documents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at adverse event reports, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Create adverse event reports and ethics committee documents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Adverse event and ethics paperwork follows set formats, though a qualified person must stand behind the content.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging appointments, procedures or inpatient stays for subjects as required by study protocols
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at appointments, procedures or inpatient stays, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Arrange appointments, procedures, or inpatient stays for subjects as required by study protocols.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Booking appointments and procedures around a protocol is scheduling work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports of clinical study procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at reports of clinical study procedures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Prepare reports of clinical study procedures, results, and conclusions in collaboration with researchers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up study procedures and results is drafting from data already collected.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing investigators of identified problems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at investigators of identified problems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Inform investigators of identified problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Flagging problems to investigators is drafting and sending clear information from records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering client queries on risk exposure
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at client queries, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Answer client queries on risk exposure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering client questions about their risk exposure is drafting from figures already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Answering client queries on market scenarios
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at client queries, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Answer client queries on market scenarios.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering client questions about market scenarios is drafting from published data and models.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of drug dispensation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at records of drug dispensation, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Maintain records of drug dispensation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 52 out of 100 (45–59 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping a record of medicines dispensed is structured record keeping, though the stock itself is handled by staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Considering commercial and business issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at commercial, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Consider commercial and business issues, including intellectual property, when managing clinical trials in a business environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Commercial and intellectual property issues can be researched and drafted, but the decisions need experienced judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying risk assessment techniques and methods specific to the chosen industrial sector
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risk assessment techniques, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Apply risk assessment techniques and methods specific to the chosen industrial sector.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sector risk methods are documented, though applying them well needs experience of that industry.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing risk-assessment methodologies to identify and mitigate potential risks
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risk-assessment methodologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Implement risk-assessment methodologies to identify and mitigate potential risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk methods are documented, though choosing and applying them here needs judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing specific operational risks and implementing mitigation strategies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific operational risks, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Assess specific operational risks and implement mitigation strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Operational risk assessment follows known methods, but the mitigation choices need local judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to development of risk management systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at development of risk management systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Contribute to development of risk management systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software drafts useful building blocks, but designing a risk framework that fits this particular firm still needs experienced people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing potential environmental impacts of production process changes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at potential environmental impacts of production process changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Analyse potential environmental impacts of production process changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental impacts of process changes can be assessed from published methods, though plant detail needs specialists.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to the business planning cycle to align improvement strategies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the business planning cycle, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Contribute to the business planning cycle to align improvement strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Improvement plans can be drafted, but fitting them into the business planning round involves colleagues and judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing organisational changes to meet strategic objectives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisational changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Propose organisational changes to meet strategic objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Change proposals can be drafted from analysis, though the recommendation needs shaping by someone who knows the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with finance, warehousing and logistics departments to optimise operational efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at finance, warehousing and logistics departments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2440/01
Source: “Coordinate with finance, warehousing, and logistics departments to optimise operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordination across finance and logistics can be part automated, though agreeing changes involves colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conferring with management and users about format
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at management, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Confer with management and users about format, distribution, and purpose of forms and reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Requirements can be captured and drafted, but the useful detail comes from talking to the people using the forms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting significant risks to the board of directors to ensure understanding
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at significant risks, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Report significant risks to the board of directors to ensure understanding.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The risk report can be drafted by software, but a director has to answer for it in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring successful functioning of newly implemented systems or procedures with concerned personnel
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at successful functioning of newly implemented systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2440/01
Source: “Ensure successful functioning of newly implemented systems or procedures with concerned personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Bedding in a new system depends on working through snags with the people using it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing and implementing strategic aims in smaller organisations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at strategic aims, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Develop and implement strategic aims in smaller organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Strategy can be drafted, though carrying it through in a small business depends on the people there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing new products, processes and services to drive improvement
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new products, processes and services, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2440/01
Source: “Develop new products, processes, and services to drive improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: New products and services can be sketched by software, but developing them depends on people and local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Discussing solutions with the marketing department
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 55 · 2440/01
Source: “Discuss solutions with the marketing department.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Talking solutions through with marketing depends on colleagues' knowledge and a working conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing eligibility by reviewing medical records
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at eligibility, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Assess eligibility by reviewing medical records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reading medical records against entry criteria needs clinical judgement, even though the records are digital.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing staff and equipment availability for research studies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at staff, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Assess staff and equipment availability for research studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking who and what is available for a study draws on internal records, though some of it is asking around.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Contacting industry representatives to ensure equipment and software specifications necessary for successful study completion
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at industry representatives, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2440/02
Source: “Contact industry representatives to ensure equipment and software specifications necessary for successful study completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Chasing suppliers about equipment specifications is correspondence, though it depends on their answers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing risk management procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risk management procedures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2440/03
Source: “Implement risk management procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Procedures can be drafted, but putting them into practice depends on colleagues doing things differently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Purchasing insurance policies to mitigate organisational risks
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at insurance policies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Purchase insurance policies to mitigate organisational risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing and buying insurance cover can be part automated, though the purchase is a person's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing environmental compliance plans for air quality and water management
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environmental compliance plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Develop environmental compliance plans for air quality and water management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Environmental compliance plans follow set rules, but a qualified specialist has to stand behind them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording adverse event and side effect data
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at adverse event, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Record adverse event and side effect data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recording side effects is structured data entry, though grading them needs clinical judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering medicines or devices necessary for study completion
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at medicines, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Order medicines or devices necessary for study completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Ordering study medicines and devices is routine ordering, though a qualified person authorises it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing support, education and training to staff to build risk awareness within the organisation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at support, education, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Provide support, education and training to staff to build risk awareness within the organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training materials can be drafted, but building risk awareness happens through people talking to people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating individual risks to employees to clarify their accountability
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at individual risks, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Communicate individual risks to employees to clarify their accountability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The message can be written for you, but employees take accountability seriously when a person explains it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying lean tools to identify and eliminate waste in processes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put lean tools well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2440/01
Source: “Apply lean tools to identify and eliminate waste in processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Lean methods are well documented, but finding the waste usually means seeing the process for yourself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in problem resolution efforts
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for problem resolution efforts, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Assist in problem resolution efforts, such as protocol revisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Helping fix protocol problems needs judgement from a qualified researcher working with the team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contacting external healthcare providers to obtain follow-up information
staying human
The ratings behind this row put external healthcare providers well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2440/02
Source: “Contact external healthcare providers to obtain follow-up information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Chasing follow-up information from healthcare providers is largely correspondence, though it often takes a person to get a reply.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing corporate governance by reporting external risks to stakeholders
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for corporate governance, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Manage corporate governance by reporting external risks to stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Governance reporting can be drafted, but a named officer has to stand behind what is disclosed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing enhancements in enforcement of compliance standards
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for enhancements, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Implement enhancements in enforcement of compliance standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Compliance improvements can be drafted, but enforcing them needs someone accountable inside the business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining the best recruitment practices for studies by conferring with healthcare professionals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the best recruitment practices and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Determine the best recruitment practices for studies by conferring with healthcare professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Recruitment approaches can be researched, but the useful advice comes from conversations with clinicians.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with other disciplines to generate ideas and solutions for risk and safety management
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles other disciplines and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Collaborate with other disciplines to generate ideas and solutions for risk and safety management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Generating safety solutions across different specialisms works through discussion between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting investment appraisals and providing tailored investment advice to clients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for investment appraisals, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Conduct investment appraisals and provide tailored investment advice to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (29–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The number-crunching is easy for software, but only an authorised, qualified adviser may give a client tailored investment advice in the UK.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing top-level value stream maps to identify improvement opportunities
staying human
The ratings behind this row put top-level value stream maps well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2440/01
Source: “Design top-level value stream maps to identify improvement opportunities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping how work really flows usually means watching it happen on the floor, then writing it up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing and conducting internal audits to ensure compliance with standards
staying human
The ratings behind this row put internal audits well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Manage and conduct internal audits to ensure compliance with standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software drafts audit checklists and findings, though testing controls still means talking to people and looking at how work is really done.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training workers in use of new forms
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles workers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Train workers in use of new forms, reports, procedures, or equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training materials can be produced by software, but teaching people to use new kit happens in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Speaking with customers to assess customer needs or obtain feedback
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles customers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2440/01
Source: “Speak with customers to assess customer needs or obtain feedback.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Surveys and chat tools already gather feedback, but reading what a customer really means in conversation still favours a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and communicating risks of specific trading strategies or positions with traders
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for risks of specific trading strategies, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Identify and communicate risks of specific trading strategies or positions with traders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The risk figures can be produced by software, but traders act on them after a live conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with internal and external auditors during audits
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for internal and external auditors during audits, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Liaise with internal and external auditors during audits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with auditors is a live exchange where a responsible person answers for the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing and mitigating resistance to change by identifying stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles resistance and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2440/01
Source: “Manage and mitigate resistance to change by identifying stakeholders, assessing change impact, and building compelling narratives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Winning people round when they resist change depends on trust built with them directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing for or participating in quality assurance audits by study sponsors
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for this work, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Prepare for or participate in quality assurance audits by study sponsors, government agencies, or review groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Audit preparation is largely document work, but sitting through the audit is a job for the responsible person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating irregularities and non-compliance issues
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for irregularities, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2440/03
Source: “Investigate irregularities and non-compliance issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Investigating irregularities involves interviews and judgement calls a responsible person has to make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing emergency management and contingency planning
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles emergency management and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Direct emergency management and contingency planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Emergency plans can be drafted, but directing a response depends on people trusting whoever is in charge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Optimizing and controlling parameters influencing industry processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: parameters influencing industry processes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2440/01
Source: “Optimize and control parameters influencing industry processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (13–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Controlling process settings is partly analysis and partly hands-on work at the plant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing information and advice regarding medicine dosage
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for information, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Provide information and advice regarding medicine dosage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Advice on medicine dosage has to come from someone qualified and trusted to give it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with the wider organization
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the wider organization and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Collaborate with the wider organization, team, communities, and external partners to achieve business objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with partners and communities towards shared goals rests on relationships rather than documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Instructing research staff in scientific aspects of studies to ensure adherence to standards of care
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for research staff, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 65 · 2440/02
Source: “Instruct research staff in scientific aspects of studies to ensure adherence to standards of care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching research staff to work to the right standards happens in person and depends on their trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conferring with investigators regarding the reporting of events to oversight bodies
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for investigators regarding the reporting of events, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Confer with investigators regarding the reporting of events to oversight bodies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Deciding with investigators what to report to oversight bodies happens in discussion between accountable professionals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing laboratory findings with laboratories or investigators
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for laboratory findings, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Discuss laboratory findings with laboratories or investigators.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Talking through laboratory findings depends on a live exchange between qualified people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making organisational changes to eliminate or significantly reduce risk
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles organisational changes and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Make organisational changes to eliminate or significantly reduce risk.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Actually changing how an organisation works to cut risk depends on people accepting the change.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Guiding staff through the process of implementing organisational changes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2440/01
Source: “Guide staff through the process of implementing organisational changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guiding staff through change works because someone they trust is alongside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coaching and supporting improvement specialists in implementing improvement projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles improvement specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Coach and support improvement specialists in implementing improvement projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coaching improvement specialists works through an ongoing personal relationship, not a document.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Facilitating team formation and leading decision-making processes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles team formation and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2440/01
Source: “Facilitate team formation and lead decision-making processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Forming a team and steering its decisions is live human work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting interviews with staff and managers about their job responsibilities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles interviews and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2440/01
Source: “Conduct interviews with staff and managers about their job responsibilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing staff about their jobs depends on a live conversation and on people being willing to talk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Applying good clinical practice
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for good clinical practice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Apply good clinical practice (GCP) regulations and corporate ethics to ensure patients' rights, safety, and well-being are not compromised during clinical trials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Protecting trial participants' rights and safety is a duty the rules place on a named, qualified person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with colleagues and stakeholders to ensure compliance and risk requirements are met
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Collaborate with colleagues and stakeholders to ensure compliance and risk requirements are met, using effective communication and influencing skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting colleagues to meet compliance requirements depends on influence and trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Recognizing and evaluating the effectiveness of risk and safety leadership behaviours
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the effectiveness of risk well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2440/03
Source: “Recognize and evaluate the effectiveness of risk and safety leadership behaviours.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (4–28 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Judging how well leaders behave around risk relies on watching people, which is rarely written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Ensuring staff compliance with health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2440/01
Source: “Ensure staff compliance with health, safety, and environmental requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making sure staff follow health and safety rules means being on site and answering for what you find.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with subjects to obtain follow-up information
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles subjects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Communicate with subjects to obtain follow-up information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Following up with participants is personal contact, and people respond better to a familiar voice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting risk assessments to evaluate potential hazards and ensure safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: risk assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2440/03
Source: “Conduct risk assessments to evaluate potential hazards and ensure safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assessing hazards properly means walking the site and taking responsibility for the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Requesting industry-sponsored trials through contacts and professional organisations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles industry-sponsored trials and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2440/02
Source: “Request industry-sponsored trials through contacts and professional organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Winning sponsored trials depends on personal contacts and standing in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Facilitating multi-functional workshops to drive capability development
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles multi-functional workshops and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2440/01
Source: “Facilitate multi-functional workshops to drive capability development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a workshop well depends on reading the room and holding people's attention live.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training junior members of staff to enhance their skills and performance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles junior members of staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2440/01
Source: “Train junior members of staff to enhance their skills and performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Junior staff develop through a mentor who knows them and takes an interest.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Building and developing customer relationships to enhance brand loyalty and business growth
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles customer relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2440/01
Source: “Build and develop customer relationships to enhance brand loyalty and business growth.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building customer loyalty is a relationship, and a person has to be on the other end of it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing participant enrolment, ensuring informed consent
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: participant enrolment, ensuring informed consent, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Oversee participant enrolment, ensuring informed consent is obtained and documented.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking informed consent has to be done in person by someone qualified to do it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interviewing subjects as part of specific protocol procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: subjects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Interview subjects as part of specific protocol procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviewing participants happens face to face and depends on their trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring operations to ensure health and safety standards are met
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: operations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2440/03
Source: “Monitor operations to ensure health and safety standards are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking health and safety on the ground means being there to see it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing patients or carers about the aspects and expected outcomes of studies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Inform patients or carers about the aspects and expected outcomes of studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining a study to a patient depends on trust and must come from someone qualified to answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting monitoring activities at various sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2440/02
Source: “Conduct monitoring activities at various sites, including hospitals, pharmacology units, and general practitioners, to ensure compliance with protocol requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Site monitoring means visiting hospitals and surgeries and checking records in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing health and safety measures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2440/03
Source: “Implement health and safety measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Putting safety measures in place is physical work on the premises.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering standardised tests to research subjects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: standardised tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Administer standardised tests to research subjects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Administering tests to participants is done in person and supervised by qualified staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing the collection of specimens
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the collection of specimens, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Direct the collection of specimens.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Directing specimen collection happens where the samples are actually taken.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site observation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2440/01
Source: “Conduct on-site observation to ascertain equipment and staff used.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Watching equipment and staff at work requires being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Dispensing trial medications to study participants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: trial medications, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Dispense trial medications to study participants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handing medicines to participants is physical work done by someone licensed to do it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Taking and recording vital signs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: vital signs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2440/02
Source: “Take and record vital signs, such as temperature, blood pressure, pulse rate, or respiration rate, as directed by medical or nursing staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking someone's blood pressure or pulse has to be done by a person at the bedside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Handling, labelling, storing and transporting bio-samples and investigational products, IP) in accordance with established procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: bio-samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2440/02
Source: “Handle, label, store, and transport bio-samples and investigational products (IP) in accordance with established procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handling, storing and moving samples is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Organising space for study equipment and supplies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: space, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2440/02
Source: “Organise space for study equipment and supplies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting out space for equipment and supplies is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Conducting electrocardiograms, ECGs) to evaluate patients' heart functions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrocardiograms, ecgs), in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2440/02
Source: “Conduct electrocardiograms (ECGs) to evaluate patients' heart functions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recording a heart trace requires attaching equipment to a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £59,800a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 248,100in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: specialist computer software in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: using specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs and analysing data to facilitate organisational change. What it cannot do is be answerable: trial medications need a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Using specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs is going; dispensing trial medications to study participants is not.

So, given all that: 40% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 24% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 35% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 160 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (dispensing trial medications to study participants) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles dispensing trial medications to study participants, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to business and financial project management professionals (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was business associate professionals n.e.c.: only about 11% of its durable work is work you already do and it pays 41.2% less. Your own job splits about 40/60: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “identify and implement strategies to enhance business operational efficiency”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Business associate professionals n.e.c.
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “handle, label, store, and transport bio-samples and investigational products (IP) in accordance with established procedures”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 11% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 11% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on. It is a pay cut, in those words: £35,209 against your £59,834, 41.2% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Management consultants and business analysts
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “advise clients on risk management and strategies to mitigate risks”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 5% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £53,295 against your £59,834, 10.9% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Quality assurance and regulatory professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “identify and implement strategies to enhance business operational efficiency”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £50,083 against your £59,834, 16.3% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 40% of its task weight, across 160 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Logisticians is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Management Analysts

In US official statistics this job is counted as Logisticians and Management Analysts. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Two honest options, and no deadline on either

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

A guided route for this

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Microsoft 365 Productivity Workers is built for coordinators, administrators, team leads and project owners who live in Outlook, Teams, meetings, files and task lists (the people this page is about). It works on the part of your job that is growing rather than shrinking: keeping tasks, meeting actions and status in one place, so your hours go on stakeholder judgement rather than on building the status report.

Try Microsoft 365 Productivity Workers free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

After the trial it is a paid community, and you get identical data either way. If the overlap above is not your job, the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for project management professionals launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Business and financial project management professionals?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 160 official task statements scored for Business and financial project management professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2440), 40% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 48 out of 100 (range 42–55, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Business and financial project management professionals” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders” (93/100, very high); “Use specialist computer software to present spreadsheets and graphs” (93/100, very high); “Gather risk-related data from internal or external resources” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Business and financial project management professionals” stay human?: About 35% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conduct electrocardiograms (ECGs) to evaluate patients' heart functions” (0/100, minimal); “Organise space for study equipment and supplies” (0/100, minimal); “Handle, label, store, and transport bio-samples and investigational products (IP) in accordance with established procedures” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Business and financial project management professionals” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 40% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 35% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Business and financial project management professionals calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 160 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
13 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.