Will AI replace Quality assurance and regulatory professionals?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 115 official task statements scored for Quality assurance and regulatory professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2482), 41% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 49 out of 100 (range 43–55, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Quality assurance and regulatory professionals” stay human?

About 35% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Weigh or measure materials or products to ensure specification conformance” (0/100, minimal); “Carry out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies” (0/100, minimal); “Conduct special inspections as required by regulations” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Quality assurance and regulatory professionals” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 41% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 35% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Quality assurance and regulatory professionals calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 115 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Quality assurance and regulatory professionals

advising on legal and regulatory compliance, identifying and escalating areas of concern to management and conducting training sessions on compliance policies and procedures. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: logging customer complaints and the corresponding solutions is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 41%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 35%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 49 out of 100 (43–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 115 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for quality assurance and regulatory professionals is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. Moving toward the second half is a real, doable plan.

Your week, as this page understands it

Quality assurance and regulatory professionals plan, organise, co-ordinate and direct the effective measurement monitoring and reporting on the qualitative and regulatory aspects of a specified tangible (industrial production) or non-tangible (service provision) output. The job title says “quality assurance” or “regulatory professionals”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But quality assurance and regulatory professionals is not one task. It is 115 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 41%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 35%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

11 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

47 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Advising on legal and regulatory compliance
This is reading one thing and writing another: legal in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2482/01
Source: “Advise on legal and regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (57–65 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: General compliance advice is not reserved to lawyers in the UK, and the rules themselves are published in full.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Logging customer complaints and the corresponding solutions
This is reading one thing and writing another: customer complaints in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2482/01
Source: “Log customer complaints and the corresponding solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording complaints and the solutions given is straightforward desk work that software already handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating sampling procedures and designs for quality data collection
This is reading one thing and writing another: procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Formulate sampling procedures and designs for quality data collection.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sampling methods are well documented statistics, so designing a scheme is strong ground for software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Measuring performance to identify areas of weakness
This is reading one thing and writing another: performance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Measure performance to identify areas of weakness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measuring performance against targets and picking out the weak spots is standard number work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

27 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Recommending solutions for identified quality problems in digital and physical products
The software now makes the first pass at solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Recommend solutions for identified quality problems in digital and physical products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting fixes needs real knowledge of how the product is made and where it keeps going wrong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing compliance controls within the organisation
The software now makes the first pass at compliance controls within the organisation, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2482/01
Source: “Develop and implement compliance controls within the organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing control frameworks is well-trodden ground, but embedding them across a real organisation still needs people who know the place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing company practices and advising on system changes
The software now makes the first pass at company practices, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2482/01
Source: “Review company practices and advise on system changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing written practice and suggesting changes is desk work, though knowing what actually happens day to day still matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

41 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Guiding internal management on implementing and operating compliance programmes
The value here is that a specific person handles internal management and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2482/01
Source: “Guide internal management on implementing and operating compliance programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guidance can be drafted from published rules, yet managers act on advice from someone they know and trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Teaching suppliers on quality guidelines and testing procedures
The value here is that a specific person handles suppliers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Teach suppliers on quality guidelines and testing procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching suppliers works through demonstration and conversation, often at their own site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating and implementing quality control activities to maximise product reliability
This work happens in the physical world: quality control activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Coordinate and implement quality control activities to maximise product reliability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Quality plans and analysis are well supported, but control activities happen on the production floor with the product.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 105 tasks

Creating and maintaining files for administrative purposes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: files in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2482/01
Source: “Create and maintain files for administrative purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up and keeping administrative files in order is routine work done entirely on a computer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing quality control reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality control reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Produce quality control reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning control data into a clear report is routine work that software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing statistical reports based on performance data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Produce statistical reports based on performance data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing statistics and charts from performance data is one of the most automated tasks around.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: to date in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/01
Source: “Keep up to date with legislation and relevant scientific and technical developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legislation and research are published openly, so scanning and summarising them is something software does tirelessly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Collecting scientific data from a range of sources
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scientific data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2482/01
Source: “Collect scientific data from a range of sources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Searching out and pulling together published scientific data is well suited to software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching and collating scientific data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scientific data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2482/01
Source: “Research and collate scientific data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Searching the literature and pulling findings together is one of the things software is fastest at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing technological advances to stay informed on quality control issues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technological advances in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Review technological advances to stay informed on quality control issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical advances in quality control are published widely, so keeping current suits automatic summarising.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining documentation of investigation outcomes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation of investigation outcomes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Maintain documentation of investigation outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up and filing investigation outcomes is document work, once the findings have been gathered.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining quality assurance documentation to ensure compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality assurance documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Maintain quality assurance documentation to ensure compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping quality documentation complete and current is document management, done entirely on a computer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and interpreting data, using specialist software programs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Analyse and interpret data, using specialist software programs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working through data in specialist software is exactly the kind of analysis computers do quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting timelines for licence variations and renewal approvals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: timelines in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Set timelines for licence variations and renewal approvals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulatory clocks are published, so building a realistic timetable is a planning job done at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Understanding the implications of relevant laws and regulations for the job role
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the implications of relevant laws in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Understand the implications of relevant laws and regulations for the job role.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Laws and regulations are published in full, so working out what they mean for a role is readable desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Accessing and managing digital resources for project support
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: digital resources in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Access and manage digital resources for project support.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding, organising and sharing digital material for a project is ordinary computer work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Gathering and analysing routine quality performance data to support governance activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: routine quality performance data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Gather and analyse routine quality performance data to support governance activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Routine quality data is collected in systems already, so analysing and reporting it is largely automatic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing existing policies and suggest changes and improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Review existing policies and suggest changes and improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading policies and proposing better wording is exactly the kind of document work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing quality control/assurance plans for responsible products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality control/assurance plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Develop quality control/assurance plans for responsible products, services, or projects, focusing on aspects like dimensional control and timely delivery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Quality plans follow familiar structures and draw on written product specifications, so drafting them is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing quality assurance controls and documentation procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality assurance controls in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Establish quality assurance controls and documentation procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out controls and documentation procedures is writing work built on established standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring performance of quality control systems to ensure effectiveness and efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: performance of quality control systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Monitor performance of quality control systems to ensure effectiveness and efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Watching how well control systems perform is a matter of tracking data over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing system design procedures and quality standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system design procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Develop system design procedures and quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing design procedures and quality standards is documentation work with plenty of published practice behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the effectiveness of implemented changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the effectiveness of implemented changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Evaluate the effectiveness of implemented changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing before-and-after data to see whether a change worked is straightforward analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to relevant legislation and maintaining required documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: relevant legislation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2482/01
Source: “Adhere to relevant legislation and maintain required documentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Following published rules and keeping the required documents is structured work that current tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing data, maintain records and producing reports on compliance and risk activities to ensure policies are being correctly
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data, maintain records and producing reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Analyse data, maintain records, and produce reports on compliance and risk activities to ensure policies are being correctly applied.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing compliance data and producing regular reports is structured work that software already does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring, and complying withing current regulations and legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Monitor and comply with current regulations and legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulations are published in full and change tracking is well-defined work, which makes this a strong fit for current tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring compliance with laws, regulations and internal policies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: compliance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/01
Source: “Monitor compliance with laws, regulations and internal policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing activity against published rules and internal policy is exactly the kind of checking software does consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Documenting testing procedures, methodologies or criteria
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: procedures, methodologies or criteria in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Document testing procedures, methodologies, or criteria.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Documenting test procedures and criteria is well-templated writing work with plenty of published examples.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining an understanding of up-to-date legal and regulatory changes relevant to the area and ensuring any changes are communicated effectively
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: an understanding of up-to-date legal in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Maintain an understanding of up-to-date legal and regulatory changes relevant to the area and ensure any changes are communicated effectively.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (66–74 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking published rule changes and writing them up clearly is one of the strongest uses of current tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Organising and collecting data for external inspections
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2482/01
Source: “Organise and collect data for external inspections, including evidence of compliance with legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and organising compliance evidence from records is largely a filing and cross-checking job done at a computer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Handling personal, confidential and sensitive information with strict adherence to legal and organisational confidentiality policies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: personal, confidential and sensitive information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Handle personal, confidential, and sensitive information with strict adherence to legal and organisational confidentiality policies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Handling sensitive information to a policy is rule-following work that software applies consistently, with people accountable for breaches.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and reviewing regulatory submissions to ensure compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory submissions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Prepare and review regulatory submissions to ensure compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Submissions follow set formats and published requirements, so drafting and checking them is largely document work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Completing or assisting in data protection impact assessments to identify and mitigate potential organisational risks and monitor risk status
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data protection impact assessments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Complete or assist in data protection impact assessments to identify and mitigate potential organisational risks and monitor risk status.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact assessments follow a documented template and published data protection rules, so drafting one is mainly desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and writing clear arguments and explanations for new product licences and licence renewals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: clear arguments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Develop and write clear arguments and explanations for new product licences and licence renewals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing reasoned licence arguments draws on published requirements and company data, which suits drafting tools well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting trial data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: trial data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Interpret trial data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Trial data analysis is well documented statistical work, though the conclusions carry professional weight.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting compliance issues to local authority and government departments for regulatory adherence
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: compliance issues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/01
Source: “Report compliance issues to local authority and government departments for regulatory adherence.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Statutory reports follow set formats, but a named responsible person stands behind what is submitted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing inspection reports to document findings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: inspection reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/01
Source: “Write inspection reports to document findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning inspection findings into a written report is desk work, once someone has done the looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting quality standards to maintain compliance with industry regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Set quality standards to maintain compliance with industry regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standards can be drafted from published regulations, though the firm carries responsibility for what it adopts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing voluntary best practice guidelines to uphold professional standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: voluntary best practice guidelines in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Develop and implement voluntary best practice guidelines to uphold professional standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting voluntary best-practice guidance is writing work with plenty of published material to build on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining ongoing administrative projects to ensure compliance and progress
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: administrative projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Maintain ongoing administrative projects to ensure compliance and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking administrative projects and chasing progress is routine coordination work done through systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting back to business functions on current risk and compliance performance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: to business functions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Report back to business functions on current risk and compliance performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling performance data into a clear report for the business is standard document work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring regulatory rules or changes are communicated through company policies and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory rules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2482/01
Source: “Ensure regulatory rules or changes are communicated through company policies and procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning a rule change into updated policy wording is drafting work, though it needs internal agreement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on how to implement suggested policy changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: how in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Advise on how to implement suggested policy changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advice on putting a policy into practice can be drafted, though it lands better from a familiar colleague.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the tracking of test results in quality control
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the tracking of test results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Direct the tracking of test results in quality control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping test results tracked and visible is systems and reporting work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting objectives for suppliers and measuring their performance to ensure alignment with asset management goals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: objectives in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Set objectives for suppliers and measure their performance to ensure alignment with asset management goals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting targets and scoring supplier performance is a data and reporting job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating quality control information to outside suppliers or contractors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality control information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Communicate quality control information to outside suppliers or contractors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Passing quality information to suppliers is largely written correspondence based on internal records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and quantifying quality risks in the development of new or changed products or services
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quality risks, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Identify and quantify quality risks in the development of new or changed products or services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weighing risk in a new product needs engineering judgement about how it will behave in production.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting test information to resolve design-related problems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at test information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Interpret test information to resolve design-related problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Linking test results back to a design flaw takes engineering understanding of the product.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating a quality strategy to reduce product defects and improve service performance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at a quality strategy, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Formulate a quality strategy to reduce product defects and improve service performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A defect-reduction strategy depends on close knowledge of where this business actually loses quality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying methods to reduce waste and increase efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Identify methods to reduce waste and increase efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding waste and inefficiency needs detailed knowledge of how the operation actually runs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing offering documents or marketing materials to ensure regulatory compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at documents, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Review offering documents or marketing materials to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking wording against published rules suits current tools well, though sign-off stays with an approved person at the firm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising project teams on subjects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at project teams, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Advise project teams on subjects such as premarket regulatory requirements, export and labelling requirements, or clinical study compliance issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulatory requirements are published in detail, so drafting clear advice for a project team is well within reach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing quality documentation necessary for regulatory submissions and inspections
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at this work, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Review quality documentation necessary for regulatory submissions and inspections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking documentation against submission requirements is well-defined work, with a qualified person still responsible for the submission.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Educating employees on regulations and the organisational impact of non-compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at employees, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Educate employees on regulations and the organisational impact of non-compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy enough to write, but people take rules in better from a colleague explaining them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Complying with regional regulations for distributing a company's products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regional regulations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Comply with regional regulations for distributing a company's products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Distribution rules are published and checkable, but staying compliant depends on how the business actually ships its products.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and managing regulatory strategies that ensure ongoing compliance and meet the regulatory requirements for changes to licensed products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Develop and manage regulatory strategies that ensure ongoing compliance and meet the regulatory requirements for changes to licensed products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Strategy papers can be drafted from published requirements, though the right path depends on the product's own history.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and escalating areas of concern to management
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at areas of concern, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Identify and escalate areas of concern to management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting issues in records is doable at a screen, but judging what deserves escalation relies on knowing the business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring software technology supports necessary oversight and monitoring
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at software technology supports necessary oversight, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2482/01
Source: “Ensure software technology supports necessary oversight and monitoring.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether the firm's systems give proper oversight depends on how those systems are actually used.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to the design phase of new equipment by providing technical specifications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the design phase of new equipment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Contribute to the design phase of new equipment by providing technical specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting technical specifications is written work, but it needs real familiarity with the equipment and process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating activities to enhance customer satisfaction
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at activities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Formulate activities to enhance customer satisfaction, like Right First Time and On-Time delivery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing improvement activities like on-time delivery depends on knowing where this operation slips.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice and guidance to the business on compliance and risk requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Provide advice and guidance to the business on compliance and risk requirements, such as data security and financial crime, using knowledge of the financial services legal and regulatory framework.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The rulebook is public and searchable, but advice is given under a named senior manager who is accountable for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting training sessions on compliance policies and procedures for staff
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at sessions, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Conduct training sessions on compliance policies and procedures for staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy to produce and the content is public, though people still turn up to a session run by someone.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Identifying quality problems in engineering or assurance processes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quality problems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Identify quality problems in engineering or assurance processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Patterns in quality data show up in analysis, but some problems only reveal themselves on the floor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating new testing and sampling methodologies or technologies to determine usefulness
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new testing and sampling methodologies or technologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Evaluate new testing and sampling methodologies or technologies to determine usefulness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a new test method is useful usually means trying it out on the real process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and investigating non-conformances
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at non-conformances, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Identify and investigate non-conformances.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investigating what went wrong combines record analysis with looking at the actual product or process.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing health and safety protocols to protect employees
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at health, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Establish health and safety protocols to protect employees.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Safety protocols follow published standards and templates, though someone has to walk the site to check they fit it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working collaboratively with other organizations using digital platforms and technologies to support compliance efforts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at other organizations, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Work collaboratively with other organizations using digital platforms and technologies to support compliance efforts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Joint working across organisations runs on relationships as much as on the platforms used to share material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining quality procedures in conjunction with operating staff
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quality procedures, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Define quality procedures in conjunction with operating staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Procedures can be drafted from standards, but they only work if written with the people who follow them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with managers and staff to provide training for quality standards achievement
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at managers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Collaborate with managers and staff to provide training for quality standards achievement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Arranging and delivering training with managers and staff depends on working with those people directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with clients to understand their needs and requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Engage with clients to understand their needs and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients explain what they actually need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing environmental compliance plans for air quality and water management
staying human
The ratings behind this row put environmental compliance plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Develop environmental compliance plans for air quality and water management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The regulations and templates are published, though the plan depends on site data and conditions specific to the location.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring development of new products to help identify potential issues for mass production
staying human
The ratings behind this row put development of new products well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Monitor development of new products to help identify potential issues for mass production.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting future production problems early relies on close contact with how the product is being built.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting root cause analyses of product or processing failures
staying human
The ratings behind this row put root cause analyses of product well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Conduct root cause analyses of product or process failures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding a true root cause usually means examining the failed product and the process that made it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing strategic advice to senior management throughout the development of a new product
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles strategic advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Provide strategic advice to senior management throughout the development of a new product.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Senior managers weigh advice partly on who is giving it and how well they know the business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing client requirements and ensuring satisfaction with the service
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles client requirements and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Assess client requirements and ensure satisfaction with the service delivered.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding what a client really wants, and whether they are happy, comes out of talking with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting risk assessments to evaluate potential hazards and ensure safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: risk assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Conduct risk assessments to evaluate potential hazards and ensure safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The method and hazard checklists are well documented, but a real assessment means walking the workplace and seeing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting auditors in conducting compliance reviews
staying human
The ratings behind this row put auditors well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Assist auditors in conducting compliance reviews.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Audit support mixes pulling records together with being on hand while auditors work through the business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending and implementing performance improvements in quality assurance processes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put performance improvements well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Recommend and implement performance improvements in quality assurance processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommendations can be drafted, but putting improvements into practice happens with the team on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with local
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles regulatory authorities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2482/01
Source: “Liaise with regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with local, national, and international regulations and guidelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Dealing with regulators depends on an ongoing working relationship and reading how they are likely to respond.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training a team of quality control technicians
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a team of quality control technicians and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Train a team of quality control technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training technicians involves showing them the work and answering questions as they go.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing staff in quality control and analytical procedures
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Instruct staff in quality control and analytical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching laboratory and control procedures relies on showing people and correcting them as they practise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating raw materials against agreed parameters and reporting non-conformities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: raw materials against agreed parameters, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Evaluate raw materials against agreed parameters and report non-conformities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging incoming materials involves physical checks, though the reporting afterwards is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing enhancements in enforcement of compliance standards
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles enhancements and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Implement enhancements in enforcement of compliance standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Improvements can be designed on paper, but making enforcement stick means persuading teams and following up in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and implementing strategies to enhance business operational efficiency
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles strategies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Identify and implement strategies to enhance business operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Ideas are easy to generate, but knowing which change will work here depends on how the business actually runs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Instructing contractors on methods to eliminate quality deficiencies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contractors and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Instruct contractors on methods to eliminate quality deficiencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting contractors to change how they work takes direct instruction, usually where the work happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Qualifying new suppliers in collaboration with procurement
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles new suppliers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Qualify new suppliers in collaboration with procurement, engineering, and quality assurance departments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Approving a new supplier involves visits and joint judgement with colleagues from several departments.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing product testing activities throughout production cycles
staying human
The ratings behind this row put product testing activities throughout production cycles well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Manage product testing activities throughout production cycles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Managing testing across a production cycle means coordinating people and equipment as work happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with other departments to foster a culture of compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles other departments and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Collaborate with other departments to foster a culture of compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building a culture of compliance happens through people persuading colleagues, which is not a document exercise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing project teams to ensure compliance in product development
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2482/01
Source: “Manage project teams to ensure compliance in product development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a project team is about direction, motivation and accountability between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating across the organisation to ensure consistent approaches to relevant policies and processes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the organisation and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Collaborate across the organisation to ensure consistent approaches to relevant policies and processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting different departments to work the same way depends on persuading colleagues directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating irregularities and non-compliance issues
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles irregularities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Investigate irregularities and non-compliance issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Data analysis helps, but investigations depend on interviews and on evidence that only exists inside the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting the achievement of quality and sustainability goals with employees and suppliers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the achievement of quality and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2482/02
Source: “Support the achievement of quality and sustainability goals with employees and suppliers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting employees and suppliers behind shared goals is persuasion work between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating disciplinary actions across departments to ensure regulatory compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles disciplinary actions across departments and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2482/01
Source: “Coordinate disciplinary actions across departments to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Disciplinary matters run on judgement and face-to-face handling between managers, not on paperwork alone.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing testing procedures to maintain product standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2482/02
Source: “Implement testing procedures to maintain product standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Putting testing procedures into practice means handling products and equipment on the line.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring the accuracy and quality of measurement results by following specified procedures and methodologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the accuracy, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2482/02
Source: “Ensure the accuracy and quality of measurement results by following specified procedures and methodologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Getting accurate measurements means handling the instruments and the samples yourself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Guiding and supporting others inside the Quality Function or in other functions to improve quality competence and quality performance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles others inside the quality function and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Guide and support others inside the Quality Function or in other functions to improve quality competence and quality performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building other people's confidence and skill happens through ongoing personal support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Stopping production if serious product defects are present
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for production if serious product defects are present, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Stop production if serious product defects are present.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Halting a production line is an authority call made on the spot by someone who carries the responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating marketing authorisation with regulatory authorities
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for authorisation, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 50 · 2482/01
Source: “Negotiate marketing authorisation with regulatory authorities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Negotiating an authorisation is a back-and-forth between accountable people, not a document exercise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing product trials
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for product trials, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2482/01
Source: “Oversee product trials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Overseeing trials means being present while they run and carrying responsibility for how they are conducted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring work processes to ensure standard compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work processes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2482/02
Source: “Monitor work processes to ensure standard compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Watching how work is actually carried out means being where the work happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and resolving problems within the manufacturing process using effective problem-solving techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: problems within the manufacturing process, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 55 · 2482/02
Source: “Identify and resolve problems within the manufacturing process using effective problem-solving techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Solving manufacturing problems means working on the line where they happen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Serving as a confidential point of contact for employees to communicate with management
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a confidential point of contact and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2482/01
Source: “Serve as a confidential point of contact for employees to communicate with management, seek clarification on issues or dilemmas, or report irregularities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Being a confidential sounding board only works if a real person is there to be trusted with something difficult.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Inspecting subcontractor facilities, external laboratories
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: subcontractor facilities, external laboratories, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Inspect subcontractor facilities including external laboratories.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging a supplier's factory or laboratory means walking round it, even if the report is written afterwards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting and analysing production samples to evaluate quality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: production samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2482/02
Source: “Collect and analyse production samples to evaluate quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Samples have to be taken off the line by hand before anyone can analyse them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing workers engaged in product measurement
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2482/02
Source: “Direct workers engaged in product measurement, inspection, and testing activities to ensure quality control and reliability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing inspection and testing means being where the measuring is done.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting special inspections as required by regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: special inspections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2482/01
Source: “Conduct special inspections as required by regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Inspecting aircraft means physically examining them, and only a licensed engineer may carry out the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: quality checks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Carry out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking parts and finished assemblies means handling them and measuring them by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Weighing or measuring materials or products to ensure specification conformance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2482/02
Source: “Weigh or measure materials or products to ensure specification conformance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Weighing and measuring products requires hands on the goods and the scales.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £50,100a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 195,800in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: customer complaints in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: logging customer complaints and the corresponding solutions and advising on legal and regulatory compliance. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where quality checks get done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Logging customer complaints and the corresponding solutions is going; carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies is not.

So, given all that: 41% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 24% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 35% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 115 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles carrying out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to quality assurance and regulatory professionals (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was research and development (r&d) managers: only about 7% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 41/59: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “develop and implement compliance controls within the organisation”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Research and development (r&d) managers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “coordinate and implement quality control activities to maximise product reliability”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 7% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 7% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Business and financial project management professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “identify and implement strategies to enhance business operational efficiency”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 5% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Health services and public health managers and directors
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “review quality documentation necessary for regulatory submissions and inspections”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 41% of its task weight, across 115 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Logisticians is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Management Analysts

In US official statistics this job is counted as Logisticians and Management Analysts. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Two honest options, and no deadline on either

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

A nearby route

There's no Space built for quality assurance and regulatory professionals yet.

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

The closest match is Microsoft 365 Report Builders, a community for people who build business reports in Excel, Power Query and Power BI without a data team behind them. It overlaps with the part of your job that is growing: the reporting and evidence layer around quality and compliance data. It does not cover the standards themselves. If that overlap isn't you, the free route below covers the same ground.

Try Microsoft 365 Report Builders free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

After the trial it is a paid community, and you get identical data either way. If the overlap above is not your job, the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for quality assurance and regulatory professionals launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Quality assurance and regulatory professionals?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 115 official task statements scored for Quality assurance and regulatory professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2482), 41% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 49 out of 100 (range 43–55, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Quality assurance and regulatory professionals” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Log customer complaints and the corresponding solutions” (93/100, very high); “Create and maintain files for administrative purposes” (93/100, very high); “Produce quality control reports” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Quality assurance and regulatory professionals” stay human?: About 35% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Weigh or measure materials or products to ensure specification conformance” (0/100, minimal); “Carry out quality checks on component parts and completed assemblies” (0/100, minimal); “Conduct special inspections as required by regulations” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Quality assurance and regulatory professionals” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 41% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 35% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Quality assurance and regulatory professionals calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 115 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
11 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.