Will AI replace Social and humanities scientists?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 273 official task statements scored for Social and humanities scientists (United Kingdom, SOC 2115), 38% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 48 out of 100 (range 43–55, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Social and humanities scientists” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Gather data and prepare reports to inform decision-making” (93/100, very high); “Create data visualisations to report findings from medical research” (93/100, very high); “Organise information for dissemination via storage media or the Internet” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Social and humanities scientists” stay human?

About 38% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conserve and preserve manuscripts, records, and other artefacts” (0/100, minimal); “Collect samples for disease outbreak investigations” (0/100, minimal); “Preserve industrial artefacts to maintain historical records” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Social and humanities scientists” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 38% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 38% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Social and humanities scientists calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 273 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Social and humanities scientists

creating and maintaining location data products that convey geographical significance and impact, preparing studies and reports on disease patterns to inform public health strategies and developing health education and promotion programmes. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: analysing data using specialist statistical software to understand disease patterns is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 38%
changing shape: 23%
staying human: 38%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 48 out of 100 (43–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 273 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for social and humanities scientists is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. The ledger below shows which rows you can move toward.

Your week, as this page understands it

Social and humanities scientists study and analyse human behaviour and the origin, structure and characteristics of language undertake research in areas such as sociology, economics, politics, archaeology, history, philosophy, literature, the arts organise the collection of qualitative and quantitative information and perform subsequent analyses. The job title says “social” or “humanities scientists”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But social and humanities scientists is not one task. It is 273 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 38%
changing shape: 23%
staying human: 38%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
80 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

112 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Publishing or presenting theories based on historical research
This is reading one thing and writing another: theories in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2115/05, 2115/07, 2115/08
Source: “Publish or present theories based on historical research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up and publishing historical research is documented, text-based work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing data using specialist statistical software to understand disease patterns
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/04, 2115/09
Source: “Analyse data using specialist statistical software to understand disease patterns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running statistical analysis on a prepared dataset is very well documented and software does it strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Disseminating research findings through technical reports or scientific articles in journals
This is reading one thing and writing another: research findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/03, 2115/08
Source: “Disseminate research findings through technical reports or scientific articles in journals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up findings for reports or journals is drafting work software does well from supplied results.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Investigating the historical events of a specific country during the 20th century
This is reading one thing and writing another: the historical events of a specific country in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Investigate the historical events of a specific country during the 20th century.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Twentieth-century history is extensively documented and published, which suits automated research well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

61 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Writing grant proposals to obtain funding for research
The software now makes the first pass at grant proposals, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02, 2115/03, 2115/04
Source: “Write grant proposals to obtain funding for research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Grant writing follows well-known formats, so software gives a solid draft that the researcher must sharpen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining which topics to research based on project goals and stakeholder needs
The software now makes the first pass at topics, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2115/05, 2115/07, 2115/08
Source: “Determine which topics to research based on project goals and stakeholder needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing what to research is a judgement about priorities and who needs the answer, so software suggests rather than decides.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Gathering historical data from archives
The software now makes the first pass at historical data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Gather historical data from archives, records, diaries, news files, and publications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering historical material from archives and publications is research work, though some sources are physical.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

100 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions
This work happens in the physical world: participant observation of social interaction, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02, 2115/03
Source: “Employ participant observation of social interaction in interventions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking part in what you are observing means being in the room with people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Analysing archival collections to explain the development of cultural patterns
The ratings behind this row put archival collections well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Analyse archival collections to explain the development of cultural patterns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Much of the archive is still paper on a shelf, and the interpretation needs a specialist to rework it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Studying objects and structures recovered by excavation
This work happens in the physical world: objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Study objects and structures recovered by excavation to identify, date, and authenticate them and to interpret their significance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Dating and identifying objects needs them in hand as well as reference knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 263 tasks

Gathering data and preparing reports to inform decision-making
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Gather data and prepare reports to inform decision-making.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling data together into reports is one of the strongest areas for current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating data visualisations to report findings from medical research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data visualisations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Create data visualisations to report findings from medical research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing charts from research data is routine, scripted work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Organising information for dissemination via storage media or the Internet
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Organise information for dissemination via storage media or the Internet.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Organising material for publication online or on storage media is routine content management.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Editing existing written material as necessary for clarity and accuracy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: written material in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Edit existing written material as necessary for clarity and accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tidying existing text for clarity and accuracy is one of the most reliable things writing software does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Organising information to prepare data for processing
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Organise information to prepare data for processing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Organising information ready for processing is routine data handling software performs accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Entering data into GIS databases using coordinate geometry and keyboard entry
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Enter data into GIS databases using coordinate geometry and keyboard entry.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Typing coordinates and attributes into a database is routine entry work that software does faster and more accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing and maintaining project related documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project related documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Produce and maintain project related documentation, technical reports, statistics and geographical information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing project documentation, technical reports and statistics is routine written and data work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing source data for completeness and accuracy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: source data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Review source data for completeness and accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking source data for gaps and errors is a rule-based job software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Requesting translation of reference materials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: translation of reference materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 55 · 2115/07
Source: “Request translation of reference materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Requesting translation of reference material is simple administrative work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Publicising programmes through sources, such as newsletters, bulletins or mailings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Publicise programmes through sources, such as newsletters, bulletins, or mailings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing newsletters, bulletins and mailings to publicise a programme is content production AI does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting activities and recording information on applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Document activities and record information on applications completed, presentations conducted, and persons assisted.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Logging activity and keeping counts of who was helped is record-keeping software already does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining databases, mailing lists, telephone networks and other information for health education programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases, mailing lists, telephone networks and other information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Maintain databases, mailing lists, telephone networks, and other information for health education programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping databases and mailing lists current is exactly what database software is built for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating appropriate sample size in medical research to answer specific questions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: appropriate sample size in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Calculate appropriate sample size in medical research to answer specific questions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sample size calculations follow standard formulae and are the kind of arithmetic software does faster and more consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining programme-related websites to offer information to the public
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: programme-related websites in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Maintain programme-related websites to offer information to the public.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping web pages current is content work software now does at least as quickly and consistently as a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using GIS technology to analyse and interpret geographical site features
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: GIS technology in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Use GIS technology to analyse and interpret geographical site features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing site features with mapping software is documented, tool-supported work that automated systems handle strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Generating publicity materials
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: publicity materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Generate publicity materials for research, site interpretations, or excavations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Publicity copy is exactly the kind of writing software produces to a usable standard straight away.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing and interpreting data to enhance understanding of human social behaviour
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/03
Source: “Analyse and interpret data to enhance understanding of human social behaviour.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data about how people behave draws on well-published methods software applies well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing statistical analysis plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical analysis plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Design statistical analysis plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysis plans follow well-established templates and reporting standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing articles for professional journals and magazines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: articles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Write articles for professional journals and magazines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing articles for journals and magazines is drafting work software does to a publishable-draft standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing and critically evaluating published information relevant to the task
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Review and critically evaluate published information relevant to the task, identify evidence quality weaknesses, data gaps, and develop approaches to address these.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Appraising published evidence and spotting gaps is careful reading, an area where software is strong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing data to determine its validity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Analyse data to determine its validity, quality, and scientific significance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging data quality and significance uses well-documented statistical methods that software applies reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating and maintaining location data products that convey geographical significance and impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: location data products in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2115/06
Source: “Create and maintain location data products that convey geographical significance and impact, using appropriate geographical reference systems, standards and symbolisation principles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping standards and symbol conventions are thoroughly published, and the software work is well documented.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing GIS models, internet mapping solutions or other applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: GIS models, internet mapping solutions or other applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Design GIS models, internet mapping solutions, or other applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping applications are built with widely documented tools and patterns.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing or supporting systems for GIS or GPS mapping software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Design or support systems for GIS or GPS mapping software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing and supporting mapping systems draws on abundant public documentation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing software for GIS applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Develop software for GIS applications, including system maintenance and enhancements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing and maintaining mapping software is coding, which software assistants now do to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining existing gis databases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: gis databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Maintain existing gis databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping a spatial database tidy and current is well-documented, repeatable technical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using geographical information systems, GIS) for spatial data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geographical information systems, gis) in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Use geographical information systems (GIS) for spatial data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spatial analysis in mapping software follows documented methods and is strongly supported by automated tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Compiling GIS data, including remote sensing or cartographic data, for map manuscripts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: GIS data, including remote sensing or cartographic data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Compile GIS data, including remote sensing or cartographic data, for map manuscripts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assembling mapping and remote sensing layers for a map is standard, well-documented processing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing graphic representations of GIS data using software applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: graphic representations of GIS data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Design graphic representations of GIS data using software applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing graphics from spatial data follows well-published design and software conventions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing and managing infrastructure for Geographic Information System
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: infrastructure in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Develop and manage infrastructure for Geographic Information System (GIS) data storage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up and running data storage is well-documented technical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing internet-based GIS databases for geographic information customisation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: internet-based GIS databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Develop internet-based GIS databases for geographic information customisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building web mapping databases uses widely documented tools and patterns.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing tools for loading/transferring GIS data between different systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tools in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Develop tools for loading/transferring GIS data between different systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing conversion and loading tools between formats is exactly the kind of code software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Manipulating, analysing and presenting geographical information by creating programmes to convert GIS information from one format
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geographical information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Manipulate, analyse and present geographical information by creating programmes to convert GIS information from one format to another.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Format conversion programmes are well-documented coding work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Programming Geographic Information Systems, GIS) applications or procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geographic information systems, gis) applications or procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Programme Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications or procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Programming mapping applications and procedures is coding against well-published interfaces.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reporting, converting or transferring data using specialised software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Report, convert, or transfer data using specialised software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reporting and moving data between systems is repeatable, well-documented software work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Joining different GIS datasets to create new information or investigate patterns
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: different GIS datasets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Join different GIS datasets to create new information or investigate patterns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Joining datasets and looking for patterns is well-documented analysis software performs strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Estimating the number of people potentially affected by flooding using GIS datasets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the number of people potentially in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Estimate the number of people potentially affected by flooding using GIS datasets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Overlaying flood extent with population data is a standard, well-documented calculation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Selecting cartographic elements needed for effective information presentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cartographic elements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Select cartographic elements needed for effective information presentation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cartographic conventions are thoroughly published, so sensible element choices come out well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reading current literature to maintain knowledge in remote sensing
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/06
Source: “Read current literature to maintain knowledge in remote sensing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The literature is published in full, so summarising and tracking developments suits automation well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing publications tailored for diverse audience groups
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: publications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/07
Source: “Prepare publications tailored for diverse audience groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rewriting the same material for different audiences is exactly what these tools are good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Testing theories using data from surveys
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: theories in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/08
Source: “Test theories using data from surveys, newspapers, and statistical sources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Testing ideas against survey and statistical data is analysis software performs well on documented sources.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing opinion polls to collect data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: opinion polls in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/08
Source: “Design opinion polls to collect data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Poll and survey design follows well-documented methods that software can apply to a stated research question.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing speeches, correspondence and policy papers for governmental
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: speeches, correspondence and policy papers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/08
Source: “Prepare speeches, correspondence, and policy papers for governmental use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Speeches, letters and policy papers are drafting jobs software does well, with a person adding the political voice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring and reporting on population health and wellbeing
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: population health in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Monitor and report on population health and wellbeing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Population health reporting uses routine published data and standard measures that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Searching for and critically appraise evidence on health determinants and interventions to improve population health
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: and critically appraise evidence in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Search for and critically appraise evidence on health determinants and interventions to improve population health.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Searching and appraising published evidence against set criteria is well-defined work with abundant source material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting background research to inform discussions and decisions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: background research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Conduct background research to inform discussions and decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and summarising background material is one of the things software is now reliably good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing and implementing appropriate data storage formats and associated database structure
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: appropriate data storage formats in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Design and implement appropriate data storage formats and associated database structure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Database design is thoroughly documented technical work software produces to a good standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reporting on the use of health services
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the use of health services in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Report on the use of health services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Service use reporting runs on routine statistics that software can pull together and describe clearly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing educational materials for community organisations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: educational materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop educational materials for community organisations, local, and national government.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing educational materials for organisations and government is drafting work AI does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Performing desk-based assessments of archaeological sites to evaluate their significance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: desk-based assessments of archaeological sites in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Perform desk-based assessments of archaeological sites to evaluate their significance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Desk-based assessments follow a set structure using records and maps already held digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing excavation and site reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: excavation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/02
Source: “Produce excavation and site reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Site reports follow a set structure and are written up from field records already recorded.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying study sites using aerial photography
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: study sites in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Identify study sites using aerial photography.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting sites in aerial imagery is pattern recognition that software now does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using computers to simulate the appearance of buildings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Use computers to simulate the appearance of buildings, sites, or artefacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a visual reconstruction on a computer is well-documented modelling work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Devising methods for collecting data through surveys
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/03
Source: “Devise methods for collecting data through surveys, opinion polls, or questionnaires.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Survey and questionnaire design is well documented and drafts easily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Building statistical models to investigate the causes of diseases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: statistical models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Build statistical models to investigate the causes of diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling techniques are well documented and the health data sits in systems, though causal judgement needs checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting and reporting the gathered data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the gathered data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Interpret and report the gathered data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading a dataset and writing up what it shows is structured work software produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing studies and reports on disease patterns to inform public health strategies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: studies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Prepare studies and reports on disease patterns to inform public health strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up disease patterns into a report is structured work using data already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing methods and systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Develop and implement methods and systems for acquiring, compiling, synthesising, extracting and reporting information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing information flows and reporting is well-documented work using systems already in place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying public health issues related to foodborne parasitic diseases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: public health issues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Identify public health issues related to foodborne parasitic diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling together what is known about foodborne parasites is literature and surveillance work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting the creation of progress reports to assess and document programme achievements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the creation of progress reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/04
Source: “Support the creation of progress reports to assess and document programme achievements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports pull together data already recorded against set programme measures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Tracing historical development in a particular field
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: historical development in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Trace historical development in a particular field, such as social, cultural, political, or diplomatic history.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracing how a field developed is synthesis of published work, which is one of AI’s strongest areas.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and interpreting data, using specialist software programs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Analyse and interpret data, using specialist software programs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working through data in specialist software is exactly the kind of analysis computers do quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting data using two or three-dimensional computer models
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Interpret data using two or three-dimensional computer models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading model output and explaining what it means is structured analysis software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing aerial photographs to detect and interpret significant military
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: aerial photographs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Analyse aerial photographs to detect and interpret significant military, industrial, resource, or topographical data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting features in aerial imagery is pattern recognition that software now does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using GIS datasets and population growth figures to estimate school capacity needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: GIS datasets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Use GIS datasets and population growth figures to estimate school capacity needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Combining population projections with catchment data is a standard calculation using data the council already holds.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating potential customer numbers for new supermarkets and predicting buying patterns using GIS datasets and socio-economic factors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: potential customer numbers in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/06
Source: “Calculate potential customer numbers for new supermarkets and predict buying patterns using GIS datasets and socio-economic factors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Catchment and spend modelling is well-established analysis using datasets already bought in.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing the operations of governments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the operations of governments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/08
Source: “Analyse the operations of governments, businesses, and organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Studying how organisations work is document-based research, which software handles well once the internal material is available.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting policies, public issues and legislation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: policies, public issues and legislation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/08
Source: “Interpret policies, public issues, and legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting legislation and policy is close reading of documents, which software does well with a person confirming it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and interpreting data to draw conclusions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/08
Source: “Analyse and interpret data to draw conclusions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data and drawing conclusions is desk work that software already does well, though a person still checks the reasoning.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing expertise to the preparation of technical documents
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: expertise in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Contribute expertise to the preparation of technical documents, including analytical reports, policy documents, audits, and performance reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical reports and policy documents follow set structures using information already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing health needs assessments and public health surveys
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health needs assessments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop health needs assessments and public health surveys.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing surveys and needs assessments follows established methods that AI can reproduce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing health education and promotion programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health education in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop health education and promotion programmes, including workshops and presentations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing health education sessions and materials is content work AI produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing economic justifications for investing in health and care services
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: economic justifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop economic justifications for investing in health and care services, considering organisational budgets and local financial implications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investment cases follow established templates using budget and activity data already held.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing operational plans to achieve health education objectives
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: operational plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop operational plans to achieve health education objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning objectives into an operational plan is structured planning work that AI does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating health promotion programmes to measure impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health promotion programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Evaluate health promotion programmes to measure impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measuring whether a programme worked is data analysis and reporting, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating patterns in health determinants and outcomes using suitable study designs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: patterns in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Investigate patterns in health determinants and outcomes using suitable study designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Study designs and analysis methods are well established and the data sits in health systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing new training programmes or adapt existing ones
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new training programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Design new training programmes or adapt existing ones.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing and updating training programmes is structured content work that AI produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing documentation for grant-related activities in health education
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Prepare documentation for grant-related activities in health education.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Grant paperwork follows set formats and published guidance, so software drafts it to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recognizing and critically reviewing the format
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reviewing the format in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Recognize and critically review the format, scope, and limitations of different biological data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing what different biological datasets can and cannot show is documented analytical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing the statistical framework for medical trials and researching projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the statistical framework in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Design the statistical framework for medical trials and research projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Statistical design follows well-documented methods with abundant published examples, so software drafts a sound framework for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Selecting, and applying statisticaling methods for medical research and interpreting the results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Select and apply statistical methods for medical research and interpret the results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing and running statistical methods is well documented and highly automatable, with a statistician checking the interpretation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing study protocols and health status questionnaires
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: study protocols in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Design study protocols and health status questionnaires.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (65–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Protocols and validated questionnaires are heavily standardised and widely published, with approval handled separately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Producing technical writing in medical research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Produce technical writing in medical research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Medical technical writing follows tight conventions with plenty of published examples, so software drafts it strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Presenting findings of sociological research in an understandable manner to the general public
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings of sociological research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/03
Source: “Present findings of sociological research in an understandable manner to the general public.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (66–74 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rewriting research into plain language for the public is something software does reliably well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Consulting on customs of specific historical periods
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: customs of specific historical periods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Consult on customs of specific historical periods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (66–74 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advising on period customs draws on extensively published historical material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Presenting historical accounts focusing on specific social
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: historical accounts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Present historical accounts focusing on specific social, ethnic, or political groupings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (66–74 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing historical accounts about particular groups draws on abundant published scholarship.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assisting in the development of GIS applications for users or clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the development of GIS applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Assist in the development of GIS applications for users or clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building applications to a stated requirement is well-documented development work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Recommending hardware and software upgrades based on assessment
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: hardware in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Recommend hardware and software upgrades based on assessment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Upgrade recommendations rest on published product information software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Troubleshooting application issues with users
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: application issues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2115/06
Source: “Troubleshoot application issues with users.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing common software problems is well-documented and drafts of the fix are usually usable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Checking planning applications and identifying any possible archaeological impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Check planning applications and identify any possible archaeological impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Screening applications against the historic record is rule-following desk work, with the formal advice signed elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing planning applications for compliance with regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Review planning applications for compliance with regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking an application against written rules is structured desk work, with the decision made elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to ongoing medical research publications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: ongoing medical research publications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Contribute to ongoing medical research publications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Contributing sections and revisions to a research paper is drafting work software does well once the data exist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and reporting incidents of infectious diseases to local and national health agencies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: incidents of infectious diseases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Monitor and report incidents of infectious diseases to local and national health agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Surveillance monitoring and notification runs on structured data and set reporting rules.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing selection of endpoints/variables in medical research for specific disease areas
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: selection of endpoints/variables in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Perform selection of endpoints/variables in medical research for specific disease areas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing endpoints follows published precedent in each disease area, so software proposes sound options for expert review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting the management of Intellectual Property as it relates to the source
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the management of intellectual property in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/06
Source: “Support the management of Intellectual Property as it relates to the source, use and transformation of location data, and the creation of location data products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking licences and data rights is structured record work, with legal sign-off happening elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating health services and performing audits to improve public health outcomes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health services in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Evaluate health services and perform audits to improve public health outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Service audits follow set methods using data the organisation already collects.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Staying informed about recent government policy decisions relevant to the job role
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on informed, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 80 · 2115/08
Source: “Stay informed about recent government policy decisions relevant to the job role.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Government policy is published and easy to summarise, but staying genuinely current is something you do yourself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Communicating research findings on diseases to health practitioners
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Communicate research findings on diseases to health practitioners.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning findings into briefings for clinicians is writing work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating specialised technical software and GIS for data integration
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specialised technical software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Operate specialised technical software and GIS for data integration, processing, and presentation to clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running mapping and technical software to process and present data is the kind of work automated tools already do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Configuring applications as per user requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Configure applications as per user requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Configuring software to a written requirement is repeatable work with good documentation behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing business cases and tenders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business cases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Develop business cases and tenders, estimating the cost of activities using location data, describing their value and benefit to the business or client.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Business cases and tender responses follow set structures and draft well from existing project information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making recommendations on upgrades considering implications of new or revised GIS software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Make recommendations on upgrades considering implications of new or revised GIS software, equipment, or applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing software options and writing a recommendation is structured desk work with good published information.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing strategic advice and recommendations based on geospatial data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: strategic advice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Provide strategic advice and recommendations based on geospatial data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping software and analysis tools already do much of this, and the written recommendations are drafted well too.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making recommendations to institutions and organisations based on assessments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/08
Source: “Make recommendations to institutions and organisations based on assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommendations follow from documented assessments, so software can draft them, though the person signing them decides.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drawing conclusions and recommending an appropriate response
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: conclusions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Draw conclusions and recommend an appropriate response, offer guidance or interpretation to aid understanding of the data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can draft conclusions and recommendations, but someone has to stand behind the advice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending systems for population health surveillance and data analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Recommend systems for population health surveillance and data analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing surveillance options and writing a recommendation is structured desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on health education programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health education programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Advise on health education programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advice on health education draws on published evidence and programme experience that software can pull together well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing health education libraries to serve as resources for staff and community organisations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health education libraries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop health education libraries to serve as resources for staff and community organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assembling a collection of health education resources is cataloguing and sourcing work AI does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Comparing findings from one site with archaeological data from other sites to find similarities or differences
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at findings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Compare findings from one site with archaeological data from other sites to find similarities or differences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing site data is desk work, but a lot of the reports are grey literature needing expert reading.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating general rules to describe and predict the development and behaviour of cultures and social institutions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at general rules, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Formulate general rules to describe and predict the development and behaviour of cultures and social institutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting general theory from a large literature gives a usable start, but the original thinking is the expert part.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing theories concerning the development of past cultures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at theories concerning the development of past cultures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Test theories concerning the development of past cultures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Testing an idea against published evidence gives a usable draft that a specialist then reworks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research to test theories about group relations and ageing
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at research, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/03
Source: “Conduct research to test theories about group relations and ageing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The statistics and literature are well covered; the theoretical judgement is the researcher’s.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing healthcare workers, patients and the public about infectious and communicable diseases, including disease transmission and prevention
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at healthcare workers, patients and the public, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Inform healthcare workers, patients, and the public about infectious and communicable diseases, including disease transmission and prevention.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The material writes itself from published guidance, but reassuring worried people is done in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Demonstrating the use of GIS in geospatial technology applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the use of GIS, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Demonstrate the use of GIS in geospatial technology applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The demonstration material prepares easily, but showing people live is done with them watching.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Applying 3D or 4D technologies to geospatial data for new or different analyses or applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at 3D, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Apply 3D or 4D technologies to geospatial data for new or different analyses or applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Newer three and four dimensional uses are less settled, so drafts need real reworking by a specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drawing conclusions on factors influencing population health and service delivery
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at conclusions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Draw conclusions on factors influencing population health and service delivery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafts of the analysis are usable, but the conclusions need someone who knows the local service.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drawing up funding applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at funding applications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Draw up funding applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (54–62 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Funding bids need tailoring to a specific funder and project, so software gives a solid draft that needs real editing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Describing the materials, size, shape, function and decoration of artefacts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the materials, size, shape, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Describe the materials, size, shape, function, and decoration of artefacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Given photographs and measurements, writing an accurate object description is well within reach of software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Grouping, identifying and classifying findings to analyse and interpret data effectively
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at findings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Group, identify, and classify findings to analyse and interpret data effectively.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sorting and classifying finds against reference types is well suited to software, though objects are handled.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using computer-aided design, CAD) applications to record and interpret archaeological finds
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at computer-aided design, cad) applications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Use computer-aided design (CAD) applications to record and interpret archaeological finds.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing finds in CAD is well-documented software work, though the object needs measuring.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Classifying museum artefacts according to historical periods
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at museum artefacts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Classify museum artefacts according to historical periods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sorting objects to periods against published typologies is something software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and recording data for analysis and researching purposes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/03
Source: “Collect and record data for analysis and research purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Collecting and recording data is routine, though some of it has to be gathered in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Standardising drug dosages according to medical guidelines
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drug dosages, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/04
Source: “Standardise drug dosages according to medical guidelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dosage tables come from published guidance software can compile, though clinically qualified people must be answerable for them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting detailed information on individuals for use in biographies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Collect detailed information on individuals for use in biographies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assembling biographical detail from records and published sources is search and summary work AI does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching in support of public programming and exhibit development at historic sites
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at support of public, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Research in support of public programming and exhibit development at historic sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Background research for exhibitions and programming is largely reading and summarising published material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting historical research for the identification of historic places
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at historical research, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Conduct historical research for the identification of historic places.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching the history of a place is largely archive and records work done at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Converting paper maps to GIS datasets by digitising them to record the location of telecoms cables or water pipelines
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at paper maps, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Convert paper maps to GIS datasets by digitising them to record the location of telecoms cables or water pipelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Digitising a scanned map into features is repetitive work software now does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Transferring information from original photographs onto maps
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Transfer information from original photographs onto maps.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Matching photographs to map positions is largely automated now, though original prints may need handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on compliance with health information governance standards and legislation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at compliance, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Advise on compliance with health information governance standards and legislation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Information governance standards are written down clearly, so first-pass advice is usually sound.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on the design of information systems for managing sensitive health and care data
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the design of information systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Advise on the design of information systems for managing sensitive health and care data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design patterns for handling sensitive health data are well documented, with formal approval sitting elsewhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Raising awareness of the historic environment and promoting conservation practices
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at awareness of the historic environment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Raise awareness of the historic environment and promote conservation practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Awareness material and campaign copy draft very easily from abundant published sources.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Leading the interpretation and presentation of health and care intelligence outputs to a variety of audiences using interactive visualisation tools
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the interpretation, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Lead the interpretation and presentation of health and care intelligence outputs to a variety of audiences using interactive visualisation tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Dashboards build easily, but leading an audience through what the numbers mean is done live.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and implementing health education campaigns to raise public awareness
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at health education campaigns, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop and implement health education campaigns to raise public awareness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (49–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Campaign design and materials are the kind of content AI produces quickly and to a good standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assessing and mitigating the risks
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the risks, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Assess and mitigate the risks, limitations, biases and ethical practices associated with the use of location data, in particular its provenance and interoperability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Frameworks for bias and provenance are published, but judging a specific dataset needs someone accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Forecasting the impact of political or international developments
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the impact of political, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2115/08
Source: “Forecast the impact of political or international developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Forecasting political effects depends on judgement and private context, so software offers a starting draft rather than an answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Publishing scientific papers detailing research findings
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific papers detailing research findings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/08
Source: “Publish scientific papers detailing research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software drafts strong text, but the findings, the argument and the named responsibility for a paper stay with the researcher.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing drafts of legislative proposals for governmental
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drafts of legislative proposals, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/08
Source: “Write drafts of legislative proposals for governmental use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Legal drafting is exacting and politically loaded, so software gives a starting point that specialists rework heavily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the effectiveness of programmes to achieve desired outcomes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the effectiveness of programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/08
Source: “Evaluate the effectiveness of programmes to achieve desired outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a programme worked needs local outcome data and judgement, so software gives only a partial draft.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Planning and directing research to compare healthcare
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at research, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Plan and direct research to compare healthcare, social, political, linguistic, and religious institutions of communities and organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Research designs can be drafted from the literature, though the decisive comparative judgement is the researcher’s.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing approaches to solve group problems based on sociology research findings
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at approaches, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/03
Source: “Develop approaches to solve group problems based on sociology research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning findings into practical approaches drafts reasonably well but needs real reworking to fit the setting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using qualitative and quantitative methods when conducting research
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at qualitative, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Use qualitative and quantitative methods when conducting research, planning and programming information for use in developing health policy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Methods are well documented, though weaving qualitative and quantitative evidence into policy needs real judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning healthcare strategies and overseeing surveillance systems for public health improvement
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at healthcare strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Plan healthcare strategies and oversee surveillance systems for public health improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Strategy drafts are usable, though the choices depend on local pressures only the team knows.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing customised solutions to address specific client requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at customised solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Develop customised solutions to address specific client requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standard parts can be generated, but a genuinely customised solution needs understanding of the client.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating analysis results through presentations and publications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at analysis results, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Communicate analysis results through presentations and publications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning results into papers and presentations is writing work AI drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on the historical authenticity of materials
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the historical authenticity of materials, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Advise on the historical authenticity of materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Authenticity advice draws on published references, though it often needs the material examined directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out case studies for detailed information gathering
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at case studies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Carry out case studies for detailed information gathering.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Case study write-ups are well supported by these tools, though gathering the detail often means visiting people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating staff training programmes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at staff training programmes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Coordinate staff training programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Arranging training courses is scheduling and admin that software can take on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising doctors, educators, researchers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at doctors, educators, researchers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Advise doctors, educators, researchers, government health officials, and others on the medical applications of sciences, such as physics, biology, and chemistry, through consultation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The scientific content is well documented, but people seek out an adviser they can question and trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing critical analysis and thinking
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at critical analysis, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Provide critical analysis and thinking, advice and recommendations on issues based on accepted scientific understanding of infectious and emerging diseases in a global context.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafts are usable, but authoritative advice on emerging disease needs a named expert to stand behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Standardising methods of immunisation for effective disease prevention
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods of immunisation, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Standardise methods of immunisation for effective disease prevention.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Protocols can be drafted from published guidance, but immunisation standards need clinically qualified people answerable for them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Initiating, planning, researching, collecting and collating location data using technologies and approaches that include Geographic Information Systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at location data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Initiate, plan, research, collect and collate location data using technologies and approaches that include Geographic Information Systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning and collating is straightforward, but collecting location data often means going out to get it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing progress and discussing needed changes with department supervisors or other personnel
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at progress, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/03
Source: “Assess progress and discuss needed changes with department supervisors or other personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress notes are easy to prepare, but agreeing changes happens in conversation with supervisors.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and testing new epidemiological techniques to better understand disease patterns
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new epidemiological techniques, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Develop and test new epidemiological techniques to better understand disease patterns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Inventing and validating a genuinely new method is the part that still needs a researcher’s original thinking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing public health programmes and conducting statistical analysis
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at public health programmes, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Manage public health programmes and conduct statistical analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The analysis is straightforward, but running a programme means managing people and partners.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing the preparation of study reports
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the preparation of study reports, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/04
Source: “Manage the preparation of study reports by others.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reviewing and steering other people’s reports is partly editorial and partly managing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing GIS applications in consultation with end users
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at GIS applications, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Analyse GIS applications in consultation with end users.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Requirements come out of conversations with the people who will use the system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating user needs to ensure that the most appropriate data
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at user needs, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Evaluate user needs to ensure that the most appropriate data, tools and techniques are selected to meet the needs of the project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Choosing the right approach starts with understanding what the client actually needs, which comes from talking to them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading and oring support
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at support, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Lead, and or support others in, the uses of current and emerging features of Geographic Information Systems, geographical technologies and location data to create solutions and open up new areas of application.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading others into new uses of the technology depends on persuading colleagues, not just knowing the tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working within multi-disciplinary teams to provide support and delivery of location information outputs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at within multi-disciplinary teams, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Work within multi-disciplinary teams to provide support and delivery of location information outputs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working inside a mixed team means coordinating with colleagues day to day.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Continuing education to deepen understanding of technology
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at education, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2115/06
Source: “Continue education to deepen understanding of technology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: AI can summarise new technology quickly, but the understanding has to end up in the engineer's head.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Helping users understand the implications of GIS alternatives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at users understand the implications of GIS alternatives, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2115/06
Source: “Help users understand the implications of GIS alternatives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining trade-offs so a user really understands them is a back-and-forth conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining community health needs in collaboration with healthcare specialists and civic groups
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at community health needs, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Determine community health needs in collaboration with healthcare specialists and civic groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Data analysis helps, but agreeing what a community needs happens in discussion with clinicians and residents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering multiple complex health and care intelligence projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at multiple complex health, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Deliver multiple complex health and care intelligence projects, adjusting priorities to meet organisational needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Plans and outputs draft well, but juggling competing priorities means reading the organisation and its people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and implementing change management initiatives to meet technical and organisational requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at change management initiatives, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Identify and implement change management initiatives to meet technical and organisational requirements, ensuring that the delivery of health and care intelligence is not compromised.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Change plans are easy to draft, but getting an organisation to adopt them depends on persuading colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with specialist agencies for health service evaluations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specialist agencies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Liaise with specialist agencies for health service evaluations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with outside agencies means someone maintaining the contact and the agreements.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with multi-disciplinary colleagues to design life-science experiments that will generate data suitable for subsequent bioinformatics analysis
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at multi-disciplinary colleagues, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Collaborate with multi-disciplinary colleagues to design life-science experiments that will generate data suitable for subsequent bioinformatics analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Experimental design is documented, but agreeing it happens across a table with laboratory colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting research findings to specialised and general audiences
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles research findings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Present research findings to specialised and general audiences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides and talks draft easily, though standing up and answering a room is still a person’s job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing expert advice on social policy to external organisations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles expert advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/03
Source: “Provide expert advice on social policy to external organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Policy analysis is well suited to software, but organisations pay for a trusted adviser they can question directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering presentations on geospatial project information to stakeholders using GIS data
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles presentations and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Deliver presentations on geospatial project information to stakeholders using GIS data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides and analysis prepare easily, but presenting to stakeholders and taking questions is done in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring press releases, telephone contacts, radio, television, news agencies and other reporters are utilised in news-gathering
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles press releases, telephone contacts, radio, television and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Ensure press releases, telephone contacts, radio, television, news agencies, and other reporters are utilised in news-gathering.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Press material is quick to draft, though working journalists still respond to relationships with a named person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research in colleges, universities, museums and other research institutions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Conduct research in colleges, universities, museums, and other research institutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Much research is now online, but some collections still have to be visited in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing publications and exhibits ensuring historical accuracy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: publications, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Prepare publications and exhibits ensuring historical accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Publications draft well, but building an exhibit means physically assembling and installing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting social research to investigate specific societal issues
staying human
The ratings behind this row put social research well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2115/03
Source: “Conduct social research to investigate specific societal issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Method and literature are well covered, but designing and running real fieldwork stays with the researcher.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring adherence to legislation and policies for handling patient data
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for adherence, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Ensure adherence to legislation and policies for handling patient data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The rules are written down, but health services need a named person answerable for patient data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with clients to determine requirements and define the scope of a project
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles clients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Work with clients to determine requirements and define the scope of a project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Agreeing what a project will and will not cover is a negotiation with the client, not a document exercise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Addressing broader determinants of health and health inequalities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles broader determinants of health and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Address broader determinants of health and health inequalities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The evidence is well known, but acting on the wider causes of ill health means persuading other organisations to move.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Instructing students in sociological theories and researching methods
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles students and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/03
Source: “Instruct students in sociological theories and research methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material is abundant and easy to prepare, but teaching a class is done with students present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Instructing students in the principles and theories of political science
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles students and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2115/08
Source: “Instruct students in the principles and theories of political science.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The reading and lecture material is abundant, though teaching a seminar happens with students in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Undertaking research to advance knowledge in specific fields
staying human
The ratings behind this row put research well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Undertake research to advance knowledge in specific fields.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Genuinely new social research depends on original argument and fieldwork judgement software can only assist with.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating volunteer activities and schedules on archaeological dig sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: volunteer activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Coordinate volunteer activities and schedules on archaeological dig sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Rotas and schedules draft easily, but volunteers get organised on the dig itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining their own and others', compliance with legislation and codes of practice relevant to the archaeological specialism
staying human
The ratings behind this row put their own well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Maintain their own, and others', compliance with legislation and codes of practice relevant to the archaeological specialism.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Codes of practice are written down, but keeping colleagues to them relies on a person watching the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice on conservation, maintenance and renovation of heritage assets
staying human
The ratings behind this row put advice well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Provide advice on conservation, maintenance, and renovation of heritage assets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Guidance is published, but advice on a specific building needs a visit and a named adviser behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending actions related to historical art
staying human
The ratings behind this row put actions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 2115/07
Source: “Recommend actions related to historical art, such as which items to add to a collection or which items to display in an exhibition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggestions can be generated, but what belongs in a collection turns on curatorial judgement and local context.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading and facilitating the transfer of complex health and care knowledge to policy and decision makers using evidence-based frameworks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the transfer of complex health and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Lead and facilitate the transfer of complex health and care knowledge to policy and decision makers using evidence-based frameworks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting complex evidence into a decision depends on being trusted by the people making it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing analytical and healthcare intelligence skills of others in the health system through best practice demonstration
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles analytical and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Develop analytical and healthcare intelligence skills of others in the health system through best practice demonstration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Bringing on other analysts works through showing them and being available when they get stuck.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Allocating work and supervising a health and care intelligence team
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Allocate work and supervise a health and care intelligence team.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Allocating work is easy to plan, but supervising a team is about knowing and supporting the people in it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prioritising resources at a population/systems level to achieve equitable health outcomes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles resources and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Prioritise resources at a population/systems level to achieve equitable health outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Models can rank options, but choosing who gets scarce resources depends on local politics and negotiation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Consulting with government bodies and organisations on the impact of proposed policies on cultural institutions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles government bodies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Consult with government bodies and organisations on the impact of proposed policies on cultural institutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Briefing papers are easy to draft, but advising government bodies depends on meetings and standing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training in applying ethnographic research methods for organisational problem-solving
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles applying ethnographic research methods and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2115/01
Source: “Train in applying ethnographic research methods for organisational problem-solving.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Method training material is easy to prepare, though the practice sessions involve real people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing work of statistical clerks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles work of statistical clerks and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/03
Source: “Direct work of statistical clerks, statisticians, and others who compile and evaluate research data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing statistical staff means managing people day to day, though the underlying tasks are well documented.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Guiding the operation of GIS equipment for users or clients
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the operation of GIS equipment and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/06
Source: “Guide the operation of GIS equipment for users or clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guiding someone through using the kit happens alongside them as they use it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating the relationship between organisms and disease
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the relationship, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Investigate the relationship between organisms and disease.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Software reads the literature well, but establishing how an organism causes disease takes laboratory work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting geographical and spatial information
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: geographical, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2115/06
Source: “Collect geographical and spatial information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Some data can be pulled from existing sources, but a lot is still gathered in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing manuscripts for exhibits at museums
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: manuscripts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/07
Source: “Prepare manuscripts for exhibits at museums, libraries, and archives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Exhibit text drafts reasonably, but getting the material itself ready involves handling originals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with health and safety regulations for archaeological research programmes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Ensure compliance with health and safety regulations for archaeological research programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Risk assessments and method statements are templated, though checking the site is done in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating collaborative working opportunities to increase understanding of the value and meaning of location data and insights for organisational decision making
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles collaborative working opportunities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2115/06
Source: “Generate collaborative working opportunities to increase understanding of the value and meaning of location data and insights for organisational decision making.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting other parts of the organisation to value the data depends on relationships built inside it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Dealing with clients' concerns
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles clients' concerns and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2115/06
Source: “Deal with clients' concerns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Replies can be drafted, but an unhappy client usually wants to hear directly from the photographer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying cultural beliefs and practices affecting health access in collaboration with health officials
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles cultural beliefs and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/01
Source: “Identify cultural beliefs and practices affecting health access in collaboration with health officials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The literature helps, but the useful detail comes from local officials and communities talking to you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing health safety standards and public health improvement programmes by conferring with health departments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles health safety standards and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/04
Source: “Develop health safety standards and public health improvement programmes by conferring with health departments, industry personnel, physicians, and others.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Standards can be drafted from evidence, but agreeing them means rounds of meetings with departments, industry and clinicians.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging in continuous professional development to maintain or improve knowledge and skills
staying human
The ratings behind this row put continuous professional development well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2115/06
Source: “Engage in continuous professional development to maintain or improve knowledge and skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: AI can find and summarise material, but the learning itself is something the teacher has to do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to legal and ethical frameworks to promote and protecting public health and wellbeing
staying human
The ratings behind this row put legal well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Adhere to legal and ethical frameworks to promote and protect public health and wellbeing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Acting within legal and ethical limits is a duty carried by the person doing the work, not a product that can be made.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing and administering healthcare programmes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles healthcare programmes and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2115/09
Source: “Implement and administer healthcare programmes, including personnel administration and staff training.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Programme paperwork is easy to draft, but running services and staff depends on people managing other people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing cultural sites to answer specific research questions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cultural sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Assess cultural sites to answer specific research questions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging what a site can answer needs a visit as well as background reading.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Organising public exhibits and displays to promote public awareness of diverse and distinctive cultural traditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: public exhibits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Organise public exhibits and displays to promote public awareness of diverse and distinctive cultural traditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Exhibition text and planning draft well, but the display itself gets built by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Deciding on implementing development policies with planners
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles implementing development policies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Decide on implementing development policies with planners, considering cultural barriers and circumstances.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The options can be laid out, but choosing a policy with planners is a human decision made together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Implementing policies and strategies to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles policies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/09
Source: “Implement policies and strategies to improve health outcomes and reduce health inequalities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Strategies can be written quickly, but shifting health outcomes depends on persuading organisations and communities to act.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing intervention procedures using individual interviews
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles intervention procedures and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Develop intervention procedures using individual interviews.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interview-based design depends on what people will say to someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Making independent and authoritative identifications of archaeological materials or data in a specialist area
staying human
The ratings behind this row put independent well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Make independent and authoritative identifications of archaeological materials or data in a specialist area, by applying advanced knowledge and understanding.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: A named specialist’s authority is the point of the task, and that rests on years of handling material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising and evaluating technical, clerical, service and maintenance staff
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technical, clerical, service and maintenance staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2115/04
Source: “Supervise and evaluate technical, clerical, service, and maintenance staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising and appraising staff depends on knowing the individuals and their work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing technical authority to the organisation regarding legal
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for technical authority, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2115/06
Source: “Provide technical authority to the organisation regarding legal, safe, secure, effective and ethical uses of its location data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Being the organisation’s named technical authority on lawful data use means a person carries the responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting research findings at professional scientific conferences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: research findings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/03
Source: “Present research findings at professional scientific conferences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The talk can be drafted, but presenting at a conference means being there and answering questions live.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Teaching medical and laboratory procedures to students and technicians
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical and laboratory procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Teach medical and laboratory procedures to students and technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Notes and demonstrations can be prepared, but teaching a laboratory procedure means standing at the bench with the learner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning and hosting international conferences and workshops on diseases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: international conferences, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2115/04
Source: “Plan and host international conferences and workshops on diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Agendas and logistics plan easily, but hosting a conference means being there with delegates.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying tooth and bone structures for forensic analysis
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tooth, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2115/01
Source: “Identify tooth and bone structures for forensic analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image tools are getting good at this, but the specimens are physical and a qualified expert must stand behind the finding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with cross-sector specialists and global colleagues to integrate their expertise into projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles cross-sector specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Collaborate with cross-sector specialists and global colleagues to integrate their expertise into projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Bringing in other people’s expertise depends on the working relationships between them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing others through effective coaching
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2115/04, 2115/09
Source: “Develop others through effective coaching, mentoring, and training.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coaching and mentoring work through a trusting relationship with a particular person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating effectively with colleagues across different departments to achieve team goals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues across different departments and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Collaborate effectively with colleagues across different departments to achieve team goals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working well across departments depends on colleagues trusting each other.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Achieving commercial objectives through focused delivery of services in the private sector
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles commercial objectives and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2115/04
Source: “Achieve commercial objectives through focused delivery of services in the private sector.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (5–29 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Winning and delivering commercial work depends on client relationships and on knowledge specific to the firm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting educational workshops on sex and health education to promote healthy living
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: educational workshops, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2115/09
Source: “Conduct educational workshops on sex and health education to promote healthy living.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Materials are easy to prepare, but a workshop on sensitive health topics depends on a facilitator people trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing or testing medications, treatments or procedures to prevent or control disease or injury
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medications, treatments or procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Develop or test medications, treatments, or procedures to prevent or control disease or injury.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Developing and testing treatments needs laboratory and clinical work, with qualified people answerable for anything given to patients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting data on group attitudes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2115/03
Source: “Collect data on group attitudes, values, and behaviours using observation, interviews, and document reviews.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interviews and observation mean sitting with people and watching what they actually do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Promoting mental, physical and behavioural health in communities and populations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: mental, physical and behavioural health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Promote mental, physical, and behavioural health in communities and populations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Health promotion works through sustained contact with communities, not just the materials that support it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Mentoring undergraduate and postgraduate students in archaeology
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles undergraduate and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Mentor undergraduate and postgraduate students in archaeology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Mentoring works because a specific person invests in a specific student over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in specialist networks and peer groups for Historic Environment
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles specialist networks and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Participate in specialist networks and peer groups for Historic Environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Being part of a professional network is about people knowing and calling on you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with research workers in other disciplines
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles research workers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2115/03
Source: “Collaborate with research workers in other disciplines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working across disciplines depends on colleagues choosing to work with you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting clinical research focused on specific areas of medical interest
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clinical research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Conduct clinical research focused on specific areas of medical interest.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Clinical research needs participants, visits and qualified oversight, with only the design and analysis done at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working collaboratively with other professionals and teams to promote and protect the health and wellbeing of individuals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles other professionals and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/04
Source: “Work collaboratively with other professionals and teams to promote and protect the health and wellbeing of individuals, groups and communities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Joint working across teams and communities runs on relationships and trust built between real people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating international health diplomacy strategies and activities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles international health diplomacy strategies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2115/04
Source: “Coordinate international health diplomacy strategies and activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Health diplomacy runs on relationships between named people in different countries.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Serving on committees to influence organisational strategy and decision-making
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles committees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/08
Source: “Serve on committees to influence organisational strategy and decision-making.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Influence on a committee comes from a person being in the room, reading it and building support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Improving health outcomes by working collaboratively across agencies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles health outcomes and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2115/09
Source: “Improve health outcomes by working collaboratively across agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Cross-agency work moves at the speed of trust between named people in each organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining cooperative working relationships with public health care agencies and organisations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles cooperative working relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Maintain cooperative working relationships with public health care agencies and organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Good working relationships between agencies belong to the people who maintain them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring important buildings, monuments and sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: important buildings, monuments and sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Ensure important buildings, monuments and sites are protected and preserved.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Protecting a building or monument means inspecting it and dealing with what is physically happening on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Instructing medical students and residents in paediatric care and treatment methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2115/04
Source: “Instruct medical students and residents in paediatric care and treatment methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching clinical care happens with students beside the teacher, and is done by clinicians answerable for the patients involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting the curation and displaying setup of artefacts in a museum setting
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the curation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Support the curation and display setup of artefacts in a museum setting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Research and labels can be drafted, but mounting a display means handling objects in the gallery.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring group interactions and role affiliations to collect data and identify problems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: group interactions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/03
Source: “Monitor group interactions and role affiliations to collect data and identify problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Watching how a group behaves together needs someone in the room noticing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Enforcing health legislation to promote public health and understanding of health protection procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health legislation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Enforce health legislation to promote public health and understanding of health protection procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Enforcement is a legal power exercised by an authorised officer, usually by visiting the premises concerned.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using traditional ecological knowledge to resolve conflicts over habitat protection and resource enhancement
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles traditional ecological knowledge and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Use traditional ecological knowledge to resolve conflicts over habitat protection and resource enhancement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: This rests on knowledge held by people locally and on trust built between them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Processing and storing archaeological materials and data
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: archaeological materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Process and store archaeological materials and data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The data side is easy, but boxing and storing the material is physical.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using geographical tools, Global Positioning Systems, GPS), maps and plans
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: geographical tools, global positioning systems, gps), in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/06
Source: “Use geographical tools including Global Positioning Systems (GPS), maps and plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Using a satellite receiver, map and plan on the ground means being on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Encouraging and supporting students in developing into future political leaders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles students and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2115/08
Source: “Encourage and support students in developing into future political leaders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Encouraging someone into public life is a personal relationship over years.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Navigating political and democratic systems and organisational cultures to enhance health outcomes and reducing inequalities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles political and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2115/09
Source: “Navigate political and democratic systems and organisational cultures to enhance health outcomes and reduce inequalities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting things done in political and organisational settings depends on relationships and unwritten local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Enhancing the cultural sensitivity of classroom interactions in collaboration with educators and teachers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the cultural sensitivity of classroom interactions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Enhance the cultural sensitivity of classroom interactions in collaboration with educators and teachers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Changing how a classroom feels depends on working closely with the teachers in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Processing and analysing biological samples to study disease patterns
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: biological samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Process and analyse biological samples to study disease patterns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Samples have to be handled in a laboratory before any analysis happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording finds and sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: finds, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Record finds and sites using photography, detailed notes and drawings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Photographing, drawing and noting finds happens on site with the object in front of you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Surveying sites of past societies to gather data
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sites of past societies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Survey sites of past societies to gather data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Surveying a site means walking it with equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Creating data records for use in describing and analysing social patterns and processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data records, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Create data records for use in describing and analysing social patterns and processes, using photography, videography, and audio recordings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Someone has to be present with a camera or recorder while the interaction happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Giving presentations to schools and community groups
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: presentations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Give presentations to schools and community groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Presenting to a school or community group means standing in front of them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training field staff, students and volunteers in excavation methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field staff, students and volunteers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Train field staff, students, and volunteers in excavation methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching excavation technique happens with a trowel in someone’s hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading and conducting archaeological research and investigation programmes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: archaeological research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Lead and conduct archaeological research and investigation programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a dig programme means being on the ground directing people and decisions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading field training sites to provide practical experience in archaeological and anthropological methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field training sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Lead field training sites to provide practical experience in archaeological and anthropological methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching people to dig means standing with them in the trench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting participatory action research to assess and design work systems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: participatory action research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/01
Source: “Conduct participatory action research to assess and design work systems, technologies, and environments in communities and organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Participatory research means working alongside the community being studied.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Interviewing people to gather information about historical events and record oral histories
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: people, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Interview people to gather information about historical events and record oral histories.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: People share their memories because a person is sitting with them and listening.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting artefacts and placing them in marked bags to indicate their discovery locations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: artefacts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Collect artefacts and place them in marked bags to indicate their discovery locations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Picking up finds and bagging them is done by hand in the trench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Cleaning artefacts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: artefacts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/01, 2115/02
Source: “Clean artefacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning artefacts is careful handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Conducting field excavations to uncover historical artefacts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field excavations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2115/02
Source: “Conduct field excavations to uncover historical artefacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Excavation is digging.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Cleaning and preserving finds
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: finds, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/02
Source: “Clean and preserve finds.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning and stabilising finds is handwork on fragile objects.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Displaying artefacts in museum exhibitions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: artefacts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Display artefacts in museum exhibitions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Mounting objects in cases is done by hand in the gallery.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying study sites through field-walking
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: study sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Identify study sites through field-walking.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Field-walking means walking the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Maintaining and preserving objects to ensure their good condition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: objects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Maintain and preserve objects to ensure their good condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping objects in good condition means handling and treating them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing carbon-dating using laboratory analysis techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: laboratory analysis techniques, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2115/02
Source: “Perform carbon-dating using laboratory analysis techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Carbon dating is laboratory work on physical samples.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preserving industrial artefacts to maintain historical records
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: industrial artefacts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2115/02
Source: “Preserve industrial artefacts to maintain historical records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preserving industrial objects is hands-on conservation work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting samples for disease outbreak investigations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2115/04
Source: “Collect samples for disease outbreak investigations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Collecting samples during an outbreak means going out and taking them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conserving and preserving manuscripts, records and other artefacts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: manuscripts, records and other artefacts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2115/05, 2115/07
Source: “Conserve and preserve manuscripts, records, and other artefacts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Conserving manuscripts and records is careful physical treatment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £39,900a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 35,500in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: grant proposals in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: analysing data using specialist statistical software to understand disease patterns and publishing or presenting theories based on historical research. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where participant observation of social interaction gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Analysing data using specialist statistical software to understand disease patterns is going; employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions is not.

So, given all that: 38% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 23% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 38% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 273 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles employing participant observation of social interaction in interventions, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to social and humanities scientists (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was business and related research professionals: only about 2% of its durable work is work you already do. Your own job splits about 38/62: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “conduct field excavations to uncover historical artefacts”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Business and related research professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “interview people to gather information about historical events and record oral histories”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 2% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Actuaries, economists and statisticians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “collect and record data for analysis and research purposes”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 1% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 1% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 62% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (64/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Archivists, conservators and curators
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already clean and preserve finds, and their equivalent is to maintain and preserve objects to ensure their good condition. Across both published task lists that is about 1% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 1% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £34,237 against your £39,899, 14.2% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 38% of its task weight, across 273 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Sociologists is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Sociologists, Anthropologists and Archeologists, Geographers, Historians, Political Scientists and Social Scientists and Related Workers, All Other. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for social / humanities scientists, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 38% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for social / humanities scientists. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for social / humanities scientists launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for social / humanities scientists yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for social / humanities scientists existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for social / humanities scientists launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Social and humanities scientists?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 273 official task statements scored for Social and humanities scientists (United Kingdom, SOC 2115), 38% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 48 out of 100 (range 43–55, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Social and humanities scientists” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Gather data and prepare reports to inform decision-making” (93/100, very high); “Create data visualisations to report findings from medical research” (93/100, very high); “Organise information for dissemination via storage media or the Internet” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Social and humanities scientists” stay human?: About 38% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Conserve and preserve manuscripts, records, and other artefacts” (0/100, minimal); “Collect samples for disease outbreak investigations” (0/100, minimal); “Preserve industrial artefacts to maintain historical records” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Social and humanities scientists” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 38% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 38% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Social and humanities scientists calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 273 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
80 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.