Will AI replace Civil engineers?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 302 official task statements scored for Civil engineers (United Kingdom, SOC 2121), 24% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 37 out of 100 (range 31–43, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Civil engineers” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders” (93/100, very high); “Calculate cost estimates for labour and materials” (93/100, very high); “Maintain records of budgets” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Civil engineers” stay human?

About 54% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Install, replace, or maintain assets to specification” (0/100, minimal); “Install, renew, enhance, and modify railway infrastructure to meet operational requirements” (0/100, minimal); “Supervise mine construction operations, including shafts and tunnels” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Civil engineers” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 24% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 54% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Civil engineers calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 302 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Civil engineers

assessing transport systems to determine need for modification or expansion, conducting investigations on water storage and delivering rail and rail systems engineering solutions using project management principles. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI is already taking a real slice of the routine work here: calculating cost estimates for labour and materials. That is a slice of tasks, not of you.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 24%
changing shape: 22%
staying human: 54%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 37 out of 100 (31–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 302 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for civil engineers is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

That slice is not coming back; the core of the job, supervising a team of engineers and technicians, stays yours. New tools, same person answering for it.

Your week, as this page understands it

Civil engineers undertake research and design, direct construction and manage the operation and maintenance of civil and mining engineering structures. The job title says “civil engineers”. The real job is the part underneath: supervising a team of engineers and technicians. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But civil engineers is not one task. It is 302 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is supervising a team of engineers and technicians, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 24%
changing shape: 22%
staying human: 54%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
46 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

72 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Checking construction plans, design calculations or cost estimations to ensure completeness, accuracy or conformity to engineering standards
This is reading one thing and writing another: construction plans, design calculations or cost estimations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/01, 2121/05
Source: “Check construction plans, design calculations, or cost estimations to ensure completeness, accuracy, or conformity to engineering standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking plans and calculations for accuracy against standards is comparison work software does reliably, with the engineer confirming.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Calculating the pressures, stresses and strains on structural components due to human use and environmental pressures
This is reading one thing and writing another: the pressures, stresses and strains in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/04, 2121/05
Source: “Calculate the pressures, stresses, and strains on structural components due to human use and environmental pressures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (58–66 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These calculations follow standard codes with plenty of worked examples, so software computes them, with an engineer verifying assumptions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating load, grade requirements, water flow rates and material stress factors for design specifications
This is reading one thing and writing another: load, grade requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Calculate load, grade requirements, water flow rates, and material stress factors for design specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (58–66 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These are standard engineering calculations with published formulas and abundant worked examples, though a responsible engineer must check and own them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating cost estimates for labour and materials
This is reading one thing and writing another: cost estimates in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Calculate cost estimates for labour and materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Costing labour and materials from rates and quantities is spreadsheet arithmetic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

64 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Creating designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/04, 2121/05
Source: “Create designs and drawings using Computer Aided Design (CAD) software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (46–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing designs and drawings in CAD is skilled software work; tools can generate parts but an engineer still shapes the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Producing geotechnical reports
The software now makes the first pass at geotechnical reports, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Produce geotechnical reports for stakeholders, including engineers and clients, during investigation, optioneering, design, and construction phases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Report writing from investigation data is well suited to software, though a chartered engineer must stand behind the conclusions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing energy-efficient civil structures
The software now makes the first pass at energy-efficient civil structures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Design energy-efficient civil structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Energy modelling and standard details are well supported by software, but the design must be owned by a responsible engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

166 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Supervising a team of engineers and technicians
This work happens in the physical world: a team of engineers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/03, 2121/04, 2121/06
Source: “Supervise a team of engineers and technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising a team depends on trust and judgement built with those people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing innovative solutions to complex technical engineering problems using analytical techniques
The ratings behind this row put innovative solutions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/04, 2121/05
Source: “Develop innovative solutions to complex technical engineering problems using analytical techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (24–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Genuinely novel engineering solutions need original judgement; software helps with analysis but rarely produces the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Testing soils or materials to determine the adequacy and strength of foundations
This work happens in the physical world: soils, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Test soils or materials to determine the adequacy and strength of foundations, concrete, tarmac, or steel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Strength testing means putting real specimens into testing machines, which has to be done with the material in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 292 tasks

Writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports are written from information already recorded, which software does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of budgets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Maintain records of budgets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping budget records is ordinary spreadsheet work that software handles at least as well as a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping records of mineral extraction amounts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of mineral extraction amounts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Keep records of mineral extraction amounts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording extracted tonnages is routine data handling that software already does automatically from weighbridge and plant systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining required records for asset management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: required records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Maintain required records for asset management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping asset records complete and up to date is structured data work that software already does automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing publications related to water use efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: publications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Write publications related to water use efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (81–95 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Water efficiency material is widely published, so drafting articles and guides to a publishable standard is well within reach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing computer applications for mining operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Design computer applications for mining operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing software is one of the strongest areas for current tools, with abundant examples and documentation to draw on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing transport-related computer software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: transport-related computer software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Develop transport-related computer software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing software is one of the strongest current uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Collecting and analysing water use data to forecast water demand
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: water use data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Collect and analyse water use data to forecast water demand.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Consumption data is digital and forecasting methods are well documented, making this close to a standard data analysis job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Keeping up to date with environmental matters
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: to date in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Keep up to date with environmental matters, and be aware of policy and developments in this area.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking policy changes and summarising what matters is a search-and-summarise job current tools do very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Planning work tasks and timelines to meet deadlines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: work tasks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Plan work tasks and timelines to meet deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning tasks and timelines is well suited to these tools, though realistic dates depend on knowing the team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing specific reports as required by organisational guidelines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specific reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Prepare specific reports as required by organisational guidelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing a report to a set format is drafting work AI does well once it has the underlying figures.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adding data collected on-site to initial research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Add data collected on-site to initial research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Merging site readings into an existing dataset is routine record work that software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Being mindful of cost implications when you make recommendations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: mindful of cost implications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Be mindful of cost implications when you make recommendations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weighing cost against options is calculation and comparison on documented prices, which software does quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating site plans to understand the size and scale of proposed buildings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: site plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Evaluate site plans to understand the size and scale of proposed buildings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out sizes and scale from a drawing is a straightforward reading task that software handles reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying traffic patterns to identify engineering problems and assess project impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: traffic patterns in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2121/02, 2121/05
Source: “Study traffic patterns to identify engineering problems and assess project impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Studying traffic patterns is analysis of counted and modelled data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Searching for and examining public and legal records to establish ownership
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: and examining public in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Search for and examine public and legal records to establish ownership.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ownership records are public, digital and searchable, so software can find and summarise them quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Utilising specialist software to develop and manage planning programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specialist software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Utilise specialist software to develop and manage planning programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This is already computer work on structured project data, and software can build and update programmes quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting technical specifications, digital information to identify project requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical specifications, digital information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Interpret technical specifications including digital information to identify project requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading specifications and digital drawings to pull out requirements is document work AI does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working within the framework of company management systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: within the framework of company management systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/04
Source: “Work within the framework of company management systems, policies and procedures, promoting efficiency and adherence to organisational standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Company procedures are written down, so checking that work follows them is a documented, repeatable job software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Handling administrative details to implement programme plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: administrative details in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2121/04
Source: “Handle administrative details to implement programme plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Routine programme admin is largely form-filling, tracking and correspondence, which software drafts and manages reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating transport project costs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: transport project costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Estimate transport project costs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost estimating works from quantities and published rates, which software calculates quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing administrative, technical or statistical reports on traffic-operation matters, such as accidents, safety measures or pedestrian volume or practices
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: administrative, technical or statistical reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Prepare administrative, technical, or statistical reports on traffic-operation matters, such as accidents, safety measures, or pedestrian volume or practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Traffic reports draw on collected count and accident data using standard formats, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating project timetables to ensure timely completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project timetables in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Create project timetables to ensure timely completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a project programme from tasks, durations and dependencies is scheduling software already does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying labour or material requirements for project execution
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: labour in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Specify labour or material requirements for project execution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out labour and material needs from a design is calculation against known rates, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing technical presentations that explain products or services to customers and prospective customers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical presentations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Prepare technical presentations that explain products or services to customers and prospective customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a clear technical deck from product information is well-supported desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling and writing detailed reports based on engineers' and scientists' research findings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Compile and write detailed reports based on engineers' and scientists' research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning supplied findings into a clear, structured report is one of the things current software does best, with engineers verifying facts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Performing hydrologic, hydraulic or water quality modelling
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: hydrologic, hydraulic or water quality in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Perform hydrologic, hydraulic, or water quality modelling.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This is computer modelling with widely documented software and methods, so much of the work can be set up automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Carrying out cost-benefit analyses for the construction of water supply systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cost-benefit analyses in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Carry out cost-benefit analyses for the construction of water supply systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost-benefit appraisal follows published rules and standard spreadsheets, making it a strong fit for automated analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Evaluating technical submissions for compliance with project specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical submissions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Evaluate technical submissions for compliance with project specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking a submission line by line against a specification is exactly the kind of careful comparison software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Recording results from exploration samples
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Record results from exploration samples.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Logging sample results into a database is routine recording work software handles reliably, once the samples have been examined.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs for projects to ensure financial viability and project success
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Estimate costs for projects to ensure financial viability and project success.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Costing runs on measured quantities and published rates, which software handles well, with the engineer checking local prices and risks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing and forecasting spend, using whole life cycle costing techniques
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: spend in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Manage and forecast spend, using whole life cycle costing techniques, ensuring that work is carried out within budget and energy-efficient systems are implemented.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Whole-life cost forecasting is a well-documented calculation on numbers already held in project systems, so software does most of the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying maintenance and operating procedures for building systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: maintenance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Specify maintenance and operating procedures for building systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing maintenance and operating procedures draws on manufacturer guidance and standards, so software produces solid drafts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and evaluating ground investigation data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: ground investigation data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Analyse and evaluate ground investigation data, including historical maps and planning records, to plan future engineering activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Historic maps, records and borehole data are digital documents, and pulling patterns out of them suits software well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing proposed site factors to illustrate findings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: proposed site factors in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Analyse proposed site factors to illustrate findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling site information together and presenting it clearly is document work that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting data using two or three-dimensional computer models
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Interpret data using two or three-dimensional computer models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This is computer modelling work on digital data, the kind of analysis software already performs to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing geological maps and reports to support construction projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geological maps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Produce geological maps and reports to support construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Map and report production from survey data is document work software is well suited to, with a geologist checking interpretation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing tender documents to address soil analysis needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tender documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Design tender documents to address soil analysis needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tender documents follow standard wording and templates, which software can assemble accurately for an engineer to adjust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying environmental risks for civil engineering projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Identify environmental risks for civil engineering projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental risk screening draws on published datasets and guidance, so software can produce a solid first list for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying risks for natural disasters
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/02
Source: “Identify risks for natural disasters, such as landslips, earthquakes, or volcanic eruptions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Hazard maps and historical records are published and digital, so software can assess exposure well for a specialist to confirm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing products or processes for waste production and potential environmental pollution
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: products in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Analyse products or processes for waste production and potential environmental pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing waste and pollution from a process uses documented methods and company data, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing schedules and reports for mine development and operation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: schedules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Prepare schedules and reports for mine development and operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Programmes and progress reports are built from data already held in project systems, which software assembles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing pollution control licences for mining operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: pollution control licences in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Develop pollution control licences for mining operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Permit applications follow set formats and published rules, so software can draft them from site data for checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing technical reports for engineering and management personnel
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Write technical reports for engineering and management personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical reports follow familiar structures and draw on data already held digitally, so software drafts them well with an engineer's edit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs involved in developing and operating mines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Estimate costs involved in developing and operating mines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost models run on published rates and quantities, which software can build and update far faster than by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting in designing built structures using specialised computer software and calculations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: designing built structures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Assist in designing built structures using specialised computer software and calculations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assisting with design calculations and drawings feeds a senior engineer's check, and the calculation work itself suits software well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and rectifying inaccuracies or discrepancies in engineering drawings and specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: inaccuracies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Identify and rectify inaccuracies or discrepancies in engineering drawings and specifications, ensuring the integrity of design outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cross-checking drawings against specifications for clashes and errors is exactly the sort of careful comparison software does tirelessly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing tender documents to outline construction requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tender documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/04
Source: “Design tender documents to outline construction requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tender documents follow standard clauses and templates, which software can assemble quickly for an engineer to adapt.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and interpreting geological, geochemical or geophysical information from sources like survey data, well logs, boreholes or aerial photos
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: geological, geochemical or geophysical information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/04
Source: “Analyse and interpret geological, geochemical, or geophysical information from sources like survey data, well logs, boreholes, or aerial photos.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: All these sources are digital records, and finding patterns across them is a strong use of current software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing information related to transportation to assess land use policies and environmental impact
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/05
Source: “Analyse information related to transportation to assess land use policies and environmental impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Transport and land use analysis works from published data and documented methods, which software handles strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending methods to improve traffic flow and safety
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Recommend methods to improve traffic flow and safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommending traffic improvements works from collected data and documented practice, so software drafts credible options for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing budgets for projects to ensure efficient transport solutions and cost management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Develop budgets for projects to ensure efficient transport solutions and cost management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Budget building from quantities and rates is structured number work that software assembles quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing storm water systems to identify opportunities for water resource improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: storm water systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/06
Source: “Analyse storm water systems to identify opportunities for water resource improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drainage networks are held as digital models and records, so analysing them for improvements suits software well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing the efficiency of water delivery structures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the efficiency of water delivery structures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Analyse the efficiency of water delivery structures, including dams, tainter gates, canals, pipes, penstocks, and cofferdams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Hydraulic performance calculations are well documented and largely computational, so software can carry out the analysis for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting economic studies for flood defence strategies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: economic studies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Conduct economic studies for flood defence strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost-benefit appraisal for flood schemes follows published government methods, so software can carry out calculations and write them up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing standardised water monitoring methods
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: standardised water monitoring methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Develop standardised water monitoring methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing method documents draws on published standards and existing procedures, which software can assemble into clear, consistent guidance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Studying pollutants in water resources to identify treatment options
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: pollutants in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Study pollutants in water resources to identify treatment options.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pollutant behaviour and treatment options are extensively published, so software can match the problem to proven approaches.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Compiling and maintaining documentation on the health of a body of water
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Compile and maintain documentation on the health of a body of water.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring results arrive digitally, so keeping the record up to date and summarising it is well within software's reach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing tender documents to detail water management projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: tender documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Design tender documents to detail water management projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tender documents are built from standard clauses and project data, which software can assemble accurately for review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing proposals, project reports, informational brochures or other documents on wastewater purification
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: proposals, project reports, informational brochures or other documents in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Write proposals, project reports, informational brochures, or other documents on wastewater purification, water supply and demand, or other water resource subjects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Proposals, reports and brochures on water topics are strong ground for writing tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on reducing environmental impact through sustainable construction practices
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reducing environmental impact in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Advise on reducing environmental impact through sustainable construction practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sustainable building methods are widely written up, so drafting solid advice is straightforward; the engineer tailors it to the actual scheme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing engineering project resources efficiently
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project resources in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/04
Source: “Manage engineering project resources efficiently.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Resource planning runs on schedules and cost data already in project systems, which software can optimise quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Optimising processes to achieve cost efficiency and productivity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2121/04
Source: “Optimise processes to achieve cost efficiency and productivity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting waste and cost savings in process data is analytical work software does well, with the engineer testing practicality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and submitting bids for new contracts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: bids in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Prepare and submit bids for new contracts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Bid documents follow familiar formats and are assembled from costings and past submissions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing and adjusting financial budgets to ensure project goals are met within financial constraints
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: financial budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Oversee and adjust financial budgets to ensure project goals are met within financial constraints.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Budget tracking and adjustment is calculation work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to building regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: building regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/01
Source: “Adhere to building regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Building rules are fully published, so software can check designs against them, though a responsible engineer still owns the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Evaluating material strength, such as timber and steel, to determine its impact on structural design
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: material strength in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2121/04
Source: “Evaluate material strength, such as timber and steel, to determine its impact on structural design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Material properties are published in standard tables, so working out how they affect a design is well within software's reach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Compiling water resource data using geographic information systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: water resource data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Compile water resource data using geographic information systems (GIS) or global positioning systems (GPS) software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assembling mapped data is computer work with well-documented tools, though some readings are captured out in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Proposing cost-effective solutions for the intended project
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at cost-effective solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Propose cost-effective solutions for the intended project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Option appraisal draws on well-documented methods and cost data, so software can produce a strong proposal for the engineer to refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using geological maps and aerial photographs to advise on site selection
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at geological maps, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Use geological maps and aerial photographs to advise on site selection.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Maps and aerial imagery are digital and well documented, so software can shortlist sites for an engineer to sense-check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Searching for environmentally sensitive features
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at environmentally sensitive features, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Search for environmentally sensitive features, such as landfills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Historic landfill and environmental records are published databases, so searching them is quick desk work with a visit to confirm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing mine equipment supplies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at mine equipment supplies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Assess mine equipment supplies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking stock and supply needs against records is routine information work that software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing planning applications for clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at applications, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Prepare planning applications for clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning applications follow set formats with published policy, so software drafts them strongly, with the client relationship staying human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting drilling results and testing data to provide actionable insights for drilling personnel
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at results, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Interpret drilling results and testing data to provide actionable insights for drilling personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drilling data arrives digitally and is well documented, so software can flag what matters and pass clear advice to crews.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring production processes to maximise manufacturing efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at production processes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Monitor production processes to maximise manufacturing efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Process data is already digital, so spotting where efficiency is lost is well suited to automatic analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Predicting the environmental effects and impacts of mining
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the environmental effects, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Predict the environmental effects and impacts of mining, including air pollution and destruction of the landscape.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Impact prediction uses published models and datasets, though the assessment must be signed off by a qualified specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making recommendations on how
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at recommendations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/04
Source: “Make recommendations on how to proceed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weighing options and writing a clear recommendation is document work software does well, with the engineer taking the final call.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting suitable equipment and planning operational activities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at suitable equipment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/04
Source: “Select suitable equipment and plan operational activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Equipment options are documented, so drafting a selection and activity plan can largely be automated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing expert advice and input for rail civil engineering policies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at expert advice, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Provide expert advice and input for rail civil engineering policies, standards, and specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standards and policies are written documents, so software can draft and compare them, with experts judging what is workable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing contracts to ensure compliance with agreements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at contracts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Manage contracts to ensure compliance with agreements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Contract obligations are written down and trackable, so software can monitor compliance well, with people handling the difficult conversations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying design alternatives for the development of new water resources
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at design alternatives, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Identify design alternatives for the development of new water resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Listing and comparing options for new water sources is research and analysis over available data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending new or revised policies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new or revised policies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Recommend new or revised policies, procedures, or regulations to support water resource or conservation goals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Policy drafting draws on published regulation and precedent, which software handles well, with specialists judging what will work here.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending wastewater treatment methods to prepare water for industrial or domestic
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at wastewater treatment methods, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Recommend wastewater treatment methods to prepare water for industrial or domestic use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treatment options are thoroughly documented, so software can match methods to water quality, with an engineer approving the choice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using computer simulations to analyse potential dam failure
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at computer simulations, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Use computer simulations to analyse potential dam failure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dam break modelling is established simulation work, but reservoir safety findings must be supervised by a specially qualified engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing advice to the public and organisations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at advice, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Provide advice to the public and organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Most public queries have documented answers software can draft, though some situations need a person to reassure and explain.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating findings to technical and non-technical colleagues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at findings, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/06
Source: “Communicate findings to technical and non-technical colleagues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Rewriting technical findings for different audiences is something software does well; delivering them still involves talking to colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating building plans using CAD software
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/01
Source: “Create building plans using CAD software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing production is heavily software-driven already, but turning a brief into a workable, code-compliant plan still needs an engineer's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using and developing Building Information Modelling
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Use and develop Building Information Modelling (BIM) to ensure systems are coordinated in a complex construction or refurbishment project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Model coordination and clash checking are already largely automated, but building and maintaining a complex project model needs experienced hands.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing geological models to understand subsurface structures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at geological models, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Develop geological models to understand subsurface structures, rock characteristics, and resource distribution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling software already does much of this from borehole and survey data, though sparse ground data needs a geologist's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting data from seismic surveys to evaluate soil stability
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Interpret data from seismic surveys to evaluate soil stability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Seismic data processing is well established computing work, with an experienced specialist checking what the patterns actually mean underground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing factual and interpretive ground models
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at factual, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Develop factual and interpretive ground models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a ground model from borehole logs is data work software supports, with a geologist judging what happens between the holes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing maintenance strategies for geotechnical structures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at maintenance strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Develop maintenance strategies for geotechnical structures such as earthworks, retaining walls, and foundations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Maintenance planning uses documented inspection regimes and standard approaches, so software can draft a strategy the engineer tailors per asset.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modeling or designing potential mine sites to evaluate their viability
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at potential mine sites, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Model or design potential mine sites to evaluate their viability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mine design and viability modelling run on specialist software, so much of the work is already computer-based.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing data to develop new mining products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at data, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Assess data to develop new mining products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can spot patterns in the data quickly, but turning them into a genuinely new product idea still needs specialists.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Devising solutions for water and air pollution
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Devise solutions for water and air pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Treatment options are well documented, so software can propose approaches that an engineer sizes and adapts to the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Modeling transport scenarios to evaluate the impacts of new development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transport scenarios, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Model transport scenarios to evaluate the impacts of new development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Transport modelling runs in specialist software, though calibrating it to local data still needs an experienced modeller.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working on several projects at the same time
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at several projects, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Work on several projects at the same time, often for several different clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Juggling several client projects at once is about managing your own time and people's expectations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating topographical maps to guide installation and operations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at topographical maps, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Create topographical maps to guide installation and operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Map production from survey and satellite data is largely automated, though the underlying measurements are taken on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating and selecting optimal locations for construction projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at optimal locations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/04
Source: “Evaluate and select optimal locations for construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Site comparison uses published planning, ground and transport data, so software can rank options for an engineer to visit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the operation and maintenance of water or wastewater systems to identify ways to improve their efficiency
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the operation, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/06
Source: “Assess the operation and maintenance of water or wastewater systems to identify ways to improve their efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Operating data is logged digitally and easy to analyse, though understanding a works properly usually needs a visit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing for pressure losses in water supply systems or water distribution networks through hydraulic analyses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at pressure losses, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Test for pressure losses in water supply systems or water distribution networks through hydraulic analyses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Network hydraulic analysis is model-based computing work, though field measurements are sometimes needed to confirm the results.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using specialist computer-aided design, CAD) software and other resources to design the systems required for the project
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specialist computer-aided design, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/01
Source: “Use specialist computer-aided design (CAD) software and other resources to design the systems required for the project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing project systems in CAD is skilled software work, though the engineering choices behind the drawings stay with the engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing final project layout drawings that include stress calculations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at final project layout drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Prepare final project layout drawings that include stress calculations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Layout drawings with stress calculations combine software drafting and analysis, with the engineer responsible for the numbers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Interpreting and following detailed technical drawings to guide tasks
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed technical drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Interpret and follow detailed technical drawings to guide tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading drawings is increasingly something software does well, but acting on them on a live project still needs someone present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing final blueprints after discussions with clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at final blueprints after discussions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Produce final blueprints after discussions with clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing production is largely software work, but final plans must capture what a specific client agreed and meet approval requirements.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating geotechnical calculations and drawings
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at geotechnical calculations, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Create geotechnical calculations and drawings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Standard geotechnical calculations follow published codes software can apply, but a responsible engineer must stand behind the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing geotechnical structures considering sustainability
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at geotechnical structures considering sustainability, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Design geotechnical structures considering sustainability, constructability, and ground conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Design software applies published codes well, but a responsible engineer must judge buildability and carry accountability for the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing systems, processes or equipment for control, management or remediation of water, air or soil quality
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at systems, processes or equipment, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Design systems, processes, or equipment for control, management, or remediation of water, air, or soil quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treatment design follows published processes software can size, but a qualified engineer must take responsibility for the final scheme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning transportation or hydraulic systems and structures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at transportation, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Plan transportation or hydraulic systems and structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Planning software and published design standards do much of the work, but the scheme must be owned by a responsible engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the contents, value and potential profitability of mineral, oil and gas deposits
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the contents, value and potential profitability of mineral, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Assess the contents, value, and potential profitability of mineral, oil, and gas deposits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Valuation modelling is standard calculation, but published resource statements must be signed by a recognised competent person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting feasibility studies to assess resource extraction and environmental impact
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at feasibility studies, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Conduct feasibility studies to assess resource extraction and environmental impact.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Feasibility studies follow a documented structure software can draft, though the conclusions must be owned by qualified specialists.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the commercial viability of new mining ventures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the commercial viability of new mining ventures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Evaluate the commercial viability of new mining ventures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Financial modelling is well suited to software, but the resource figures underpinning it must come from a recognised expert.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing plans for oil and gas field drilling
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Develop plans for oil and gas field drilling.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Well planning uses documented methods and specialist software, but drilling programmes must be approved by an accountable engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning mining operations, specifying processes, labour usage and equipment for safe and economical mineral extraction
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at operations, specifying processes, labour usage and equipment, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Plan mining operations, specifying processes, labour usage, and equipment for safe and economical mineral extraction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Mine planning software does much of the sequencing, but the plan's safety must be owned by a qualified mining engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing structural forces using expert knowledge
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at structural forces, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/04
Source: “Analyse structural forces using expert knowledge.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Force analysis follows published methods that software applies well, but a chartered engineer must stand behind safety-critical results.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating computer models using specialist software to design safe and efficient structures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at computer models, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/04
Source: “Generate computer models using specialist software to design safe and efficient structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Modelling is already computer work, but a chartered engineer must set up and check anything people's safety depends on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Generating comprehensive engineering designs and drawings for various components
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at comprehensive engineering designs, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2121/04
Source: “Generate comprehensive engineering designs and drawings for various components, structures, and systems used in industrial and commercial construction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software produces drawings and standard details well, but a full design package must be owned by a responsible engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing railway engineering projects to enhance environmental sustainability
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at railway engineering projects, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/05
Source: “Design railway engineering projects to enhance environmental sustainability, safety, security, and inclusivity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rail design standards are documented and software can apply them, but safety-critical schemes need an accountable engineer's approval.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing integrated designs that maintain or improve the safety and reliability of the railway
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at integrated designs, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/05
Source: “Develop integrated designs that maintain or improve the safety and reliability of the railway.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Much of the design work is computer-based, though railway safety approvals require a competent engineer to take responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting feasibility studies for constructing water supply and treatment facilities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at feasibility studies, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/06
Source: “Conduct feasibility studies for constructing water supply and treatment facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Feasibility studies follow documented methods software can draft, but the engineering conclusions must be owned by a qualified engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Devising flood defence strategies, river and flood plain modelling
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at flood defence strategies, river and flood plain, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2121/06
Source: “Devise flood defence strategies including river and flood plain modelling.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Flood modelling is computer work with published methods, but the strategy must be signed off by an accountable engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing lift stations for water or wastewater
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at lift stations, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Design lift stations for water or wastewater, including well systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pumping station design follows standard sizing rules software can apply, with a qualified engineer approving the final scheme.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing pumping systems and stations for wastewater collection
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at systems, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Design pumping systems and stations for wastewater collection.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pump and pipe sizing is standard calculation well suited to software, though the design must be owned by a responsible engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing water storage tanks and facilities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at water storage tanks, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Design water storage tanks and facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Tank design follows published structural and water-industry standards, though a responsible engineer must check and sign the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing water supply channels
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at water supply channels, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Design water supply channels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Channel hydraulics is standard calculation software handles, but the finished design must be approved by an accountable engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring flood levels at times of high risk
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at flood levels, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Monitor flood levels at times of high risk.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: River gauges report automatically and software can watch them constantly, but acting on a flood alert is an official responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising and managing the procurement of an organisation's products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the procurement of an organisation's products, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2121/01
Source: “Advise and manage the procurement of an organisation's products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Procurement analysis is easy to produce, but advising and steering buying decisions involves people and negotiation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with clients to identify their requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Liaise with clients to identify their requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Drawing out what a client actually needs happens in conversation with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining contact with contractors and clients to ensure work completion at minimum cost
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at contact, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2121/06
Source: “Maintain contact with contractors and clients to ensure work completion at minimum cost.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping contractors and clients aligned on cost depends on an ongoing working relationship.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating project activities with consultants
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project activities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Coordinate project activities with consultants, subcontractors, and supervisors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Scheduling and chasing can be drafted automatically, but keeping consultants and subcontractors aligned runs on working relationships.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the environmental impacts of engineering
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the environmental impacts well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Assess the environmental impacts of engineering, architecture, or research and development activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental impact assessment follows documented methods, though the decisive detail is specific to the site and needs visiting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating risks or geological hazards for the site
staying human
The ratings behind this row put risks well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Investigate risks or geological hazards for the site.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Hazard records and mapping are largely digital, so software can flag the risks, with fieldwork confirming what is actually there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing geological mine maps to plan extraction processes
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for geological mine maps, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Design geological mine maps to plan extraction processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Mine planning software already does much of this, but the geology of each deposit is private, specialist knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Locating and estimating probable deposits of natural gas
staying human
The ratings behind this row put probable deposits of natural gas well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Locate and estimate probable deposits of natural gas, oil, mineral ore, or underground water using various research methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Estimating deposits from survey and well data is computational work software supports well, with geologists judging the uncertain parts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating potential mining locations
staying human
The ratings behind this row put potential mining locations well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Evaluate potential mining locations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Screening locations from geological and licensing data is desk work software supports, with site visits confirming the shortlist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing transport systems to determine need for modification or expansion
staying human
The ratings behind this row put transport systems well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 95 · 2121/05
Source: “Assess transport systems to determine need for modification or expansion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing whether a transport system needs expanding is data analysis software supports, with site knowledge shaping the conclusion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating projects' impact on traffic and traffic control adequacy at development sites
staying human
The ratings behind this row put projects' impact well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 90 · 2121/05
Source: “Evaluate projects' impact on traffic and traffic control adequacy at development sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Traffic impact assessment uses standard methods and available data, so software produces a solid assessment for checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating equipment failures to diagnose faulty operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment failures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Investigate equipment failures to diagnose faulty operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Investigating why equipment failed is structured analysis, though evidence comes from the machine itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and characterising specific causes or sources of water pollution
staying human
The ratings behind this row put specific causes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Identify and characterise specific causes or sources of water pollution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Data can point to likely sources, but confirming where pollution comes from usually means tracing it on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or evaluating designs for contaminant treatment or disposal facilities
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for designs, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Review or evaluate designs for contaminant treatment or disposal facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reviewing treatment facility designs is document work, though environmental permits expect a technically competent person to stand behind the review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Planning and designing geotechnical projects
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for geotechnical projects, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Plan and design geotechnical projects, considering risk, budgets, and resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Planning follows documented methods software can draft, but signing off a ground-engineering scheme is a responsibility an engineer must carry.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying risks associated with contaminated land and determining engineering measures to manage those risks with specialists
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for risks, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Identify risks associated with contaminated land and determine engineering measures to manage those risks with specialists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Contaminated-land guidance is published and searchable, but deciding remediation for a specific site carries responsibility a qualified person holds.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing mining and mineral treatment equipment in collaboration with engineering specialists
staying human
The ratings behind this row put mineral treatment equipment well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Design mining and mineral treatment equipment in collaboration with engineering specialists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design software helps with layouts and sizing, but bespoke plant relies on specialists' practical experience of similar kit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Utilising creative thinking and problem-solving techniques to challenge assumptions and contribute to continuous improvement
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles creative and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Utilise creative thinking and problem-solving techniques to challenge assumptions and contribute to continuous improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Challenging assumptions usefully depends on knowing the organisation and being heard within it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Advising government agencies on water resource management and treatment issues
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles government agencies and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Advise government agencies on water resource management and treatment issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Technical analysis can be automated, but advising public bodies involves trusted specialists explaining and defending their reasoning.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with local authorities and public bodies to ensure regulatory compliance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles local authorities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Liaise with local authorities and public bodies to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Dealings with councils and public bodies rely on established relationships, though the submissions behind them can largely be drafted digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Deciding on the disposal of expired systems equipment and placement of new equipment
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the disposal of expired systems equipment well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Decide on the disposal of expired systems equipment and placement of new equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Replacement decisions follow documented equipment data and rules, but the placement choice needs someone who knows the building.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Observing and interpreting readings on gauges
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: readings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2121/01
Source: “Observe and interpret readings on gauges, meters, and charts to ensure that boilers are operating properly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Where instruments feed a monitoring system, software spots problems well; where gauges must be read locally, someone has to be there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Devising methods to store excavated soil
staying human
The ratings behind this row put methods well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Devise methods to store excavated soil.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Standard spoil-management options are documented, but the practical answer depends on the space and ground at that site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring the development of systems and equipment
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the development of systems well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Monitor the development of systems and equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress tracking against plans is straightforward information work, though checking equipment in practice needs someone on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Devising solutions for land reclamation problems
staying human
The ratings behind this row put solutions well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Devise solutions for land reclamation problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reclamation techniques are documented, but the right answer depends on that site's ground, contamination and planning limits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing ground suitability for engineering projects like dams or tunnels
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for ground suitability, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Assess ground suitability for engineering projects like dams or tunnels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Ground data is digital and the methods published, but judging whether a dam site is safe carries responsibility a named engineer holds.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning and organising specific field investigations to gather relevant data
staying human
The ratings behind this row put specific field investigations well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Plan and organise specific field investigations to gather relevant data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investigation plans follow standard patterns software can draft, but arranging access and rigs for a real site needs local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing risk and value during construction projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put risk well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2121/02
Source: “Manage risk and value during construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk registers and value studies are structured documents software can maintain, though the judgements behind them come from project experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on landscape restoration post-extraction
staying human
The ratings behind this row put landscape restoration post-extraction well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Advise on landscape restoration post-extraction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Restoration guidance is published and searchable, but the workable scheme depends on the specific site and planning conditions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring construction sites are supplied with necessary materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/04
Source: “Ensure construction sites are supplied with necessary materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Ordering and scheduling deliveries is systems work, but material problems get sorted at the gate.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing strategies to achieve environmental and sustainability objectives
staying human
The ratings behind this row put strategies well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2121/04
Source: “Implement strategies to achieve environmental and sustainability objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Plans and reporting can be drafted automatically, but actually making changes happen across a project depends on people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Complying with industry-specific safety regulations to ensure operational safety
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for industry-specific safety regulations, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Comply with industry-specific safety regulations to ensure operational safety.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rules are published and checkable by software, but responsibility for actually working safely rests on named, qualified people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and managing risks associated with the work
staying human
The ratings behind this row put risks well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Identify and manage risks associated with the work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Risk registers follow standard formats software can draft, but spotting the real risks relies on experience of similar work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing bridges and repairing channel streams in floodplain drainage systems
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for bridges, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Design bridges and repair channel streams in floodplain drainage systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Bridge design software applies published codes, but the scheme must be approved by a qualified engineer and built on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with structural engineers for project stability assessments
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles structural engineers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Coordinate with structural engineers for project stability assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordination runs on conversations between engineers about a specific structure, though software can prepare the questions and log the answers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Commissioning the work of contractors
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the work of contractors and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Commission the work of contractors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Appointing and briefing contractors is document work software supports, though the negotiation and choice rest on a working relationship.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with others, construction managers, planners and designing teams
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles others, construction managers, planners and designing teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/01, 2121/05
Source: “Liaise with others including construction managers, planners and design teams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating with construction managers, planners and designers runs on live conversation and negotiation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing lighting systems to determine need for modification or expansion
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Assess lighting systems to determine need for modification or expansion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Lighting assessments involve night-time surveys as well as calculation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating project fees based on budgetary constraints and material costs
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project fees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Negotiate project fees based on budgetary constraints and material costs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can work out the numbers, but agreeing a fee is a live negotiation where the relationship shapes the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating tenders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles tenders and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2121/01
Source: “Negotiate tenders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software prepares the numbers and positions, but the give and take of a live tender negotiation stays with people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing engineering solutions for cleaning up industrial accidents
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for solutions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2121/02
Source: “Develop engineering solutions for cleaning up industrial accidents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Clean-up methods are documented, but each incident is different and the plan must be signed off by an accountable engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Evaluating the performance of engineers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the performance of engineers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Evaluate the performance of engineers, scientists, and other mine personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (24–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can summarise records, but judging and discussing someone's performance rests on a working relationship with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing plans for new transport systems
staying human
The ratings behind this row put plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 95 · 2121/05
Source: “Design plans for new transport systems including airports and motorways.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Planning new airports and motorways calls for original engineering judgement across many constraints, with software assisting the drawings and analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing transport systems using sustainable materials like porous pavement
staying human
The ratings behind this row put transport systems well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Design transport systems using sustainable materials like porous pavement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Sustainable pavement design needs judgement about a specific site and climate, with software helping on materials and calculations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing plans for environmentally sound deconstruction of damaged roadways and transporting structures for sustainable development
staying human
The ratings behind this row put plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Develop plans for environmentally sound deconstruction of damaged roadways and transport structures for sustainable development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Deconstruction planning needs site-specific judgement about structures and materials, with software supporting the analysis and documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the layout planning of construction projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the layout planning of construction projects well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Oversee the layout planning of construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Site layout planning combines drawing work software supports with judgement about how the site will actually be used.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating contracts with customers and suppliers for transportation projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contracts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Negotiate contracts with customers and suppliers for transportation projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract wording can be drafted by software, but reaching agreement on terms is a live negotiation between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting risk assessments and hazard reviews to ensure safe working practices in rail operations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for risk assessments, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2121/02, 2121/05
Source: “Conduct risk assessments and hazard reviews to ensure safe working practices in rail operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rail safety cases follow published standards software can draft, but the assessment must be made and owned by a competent person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on safe and regulatory-compliant development and management of mineral sites
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for safe, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Advise on safe and regulatory-compliant development and management of mineral sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Mining rules are published, but advising a specific site on safety and permissions carries responsibility a qualified person must hold.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on improving structural integrity
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for improving structural integrity, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Advise on improving structural integrity, including removal or repair of defective parts or rebuilding.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 27 out of 100 (20–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Repair advice needs someone to see the defect and take responsibility for saying the structure is safe.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with architects, engineers and surveyors to align project objectives
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles architects, engineers and surveyors and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2121/01
Source: “Coordinate with architects, engineers, and surveyors to align project objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Aligning several professionals depends on live give-and-take between people, though software can prepare the agendas and record what was agreed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing technical advice to industrial or managerial personnel regarding design
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technical advice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Provide technical advice to industrial or managerial personnel regarding design, construction, programme modifications, or structural repairs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Advice on repairs and changes rests on site-specific knowledge and a trusted engineer's word, though software can draft the technical reasoning.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Liaising with statutory bodies for construction project compliance
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for statutory bodies, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Liaise with statutory bodies for construction project compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Dealing with regulators involves named, accountable people negotiating a specific case, though software can prepare submissions and track requirements.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Organising technicians' work in building services
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technicians' work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Organise technicians' work in building services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Work planning can be drafted automatically, but allocating jobs to particular technicians depends on knowing them and the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with architects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles architects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2121/04
Source: “Liaise with architects, engineers and designers to understand their design requirements and provide technical advice to manufacturing and construction technicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Passing requirements between designers and site teams depends on live conversations, though software can prepare and record technical detail.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying effective systems engineering practice
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles effective systems engineering practice and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Apply effective systems engineering practice, considering the interfaces between work packages and promoting and maintaining effective communications between disciplines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Interface registers can be maintained automatically, but keeping different engineering teams genuinely talking to each other needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting communities in implementing stormwater monitoring programmes to manage water quality
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles communities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Assist communities in implementing stormwater monitoring programmes to manage water quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guidance and monitoring plans can be drafted automatically, but helping a community actually run one depends on working with people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring buildings meet health and safety requirements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: buildings meet health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/01
Source: “Ensure buildings meet health and safety requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking a building against safety rules is well documented, but confirming what was actually built means being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining and processing geophysical data to inform construction projects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: geophysical data, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Obtain and process geophysical data to inform construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Collecting geophysical data means equipment in the field, while processing it afterwards is well-established computing work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compliance with health and safety regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/02
Source: “Ensure compliance with health and safety regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Compliance rules are published and checkable at a desk, though confirming real conditions on site still needs an engineer present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing sludge treatment plants
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for sludge treatment plants, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Design sludge treatment plants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (21–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Sludge plant design is one-off engineering that a licensed engineer has to produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting project ideas to stakeholders to gain approval and feedback
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project ideas and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Present project ideas to stakeholders to gain approval and feedback.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can build the slides, but winning approval happens live in the room with people deciding whether they believe the engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with the public regarding construction projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the public regarding construction projects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2121/06
Source: “Communicate with the public regarding construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Notices and newsletters can be drafted automatically, but answering worried neighbours in person is what the task really involves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging access onto sites for operational purposes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles access and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Arrange access onto sites for operational purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Permits and notices are standard paperwork, but getting access agreed often means talking to landowners and site managers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting structural designs to clients for approval and compliance
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for structural designs, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Present structural designs to clients for approval and compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The drawings and explanation can be prepared by software, but the engineer presents them and is answerable for their compliance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring conditions during and after construction to ensure structural stability
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Monitor conditions during and after construction to ensure structural stability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Sensors and automatic alerts do much of the watching, but installing them and judging worrying movement needs an accountable engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Exploring and mapping potential sites for mineral extraction
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: potential sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Explore and map potential sites for mineral extraction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Desk study of maps and survey data narrows the search, but confirming a prospect still means going out and looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting investigations on water storage
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: investigations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Conduct investigations on water storage, wastewater discharge, and compliance issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Records analysis is quick by software, but compliance investigations involve site visits and findings a responsible officer must support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Efficientlying organise the plant and site facilities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: organise the plant, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Efficiently organise the plant and site facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Site layout can be planned on a drawing, but making plant and facilities actually work needs someone judging the space in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing bespoke equipment designs tailored to specific site requirements
staying human
The ratings behind this row put bespoke equipment designs well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Develop bespoke equipment designs tailored to specific site requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: One-off equipment for an awkward site relies on hands-on experience of that site, so software gives starting sketches at best.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Delivering rail and rail systems engineering solutions using project management principles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rail, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Deliver rail and rail systems engineering solutions using project management principles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Project management paperwork suits software, but delivering railway works means being trackside and coordinating teams in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering rail engineering solutions within budget and to industry specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rail engineering solutions within budget, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Deliver rail engineering solutions within budget and to industry specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cost and specification tracking is well supported by software, though delivering the work itself happens out on the railway.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning alteration or modification of existing transport structures to improve safety or function
staying human
The ratings behind this row put alteration well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Plan alteration or modification of existing transport structures to improve safety or function.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Planning changes to existing structures needs engineering judgement about a specific site, with software supporting the analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engineering erosion and sedimentation control systems for transport projects
staying human
The ratings behind this row put erosion well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Engineer erosion and sedimentation control systems for transport projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Erosion control design needs site-specific engineering judgement, though software supports the calculations and drawings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing training to technicians on operating remote sensing technology for environmental monitoring
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: technicians, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Provide training to technicians on operating remote sensing technology for environmental monitoring.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training technicians on the kit means showing them how it works in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with architects to ensure safe and aesthetically fitting designs
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles architects and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Collaborate with architects to ensure safe and aesthetically fitting designs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with architects on safe and attractive designs depends on live give and take between professionals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Addressing unexpected issues during construction project execution
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unexpected issues during construction project execution, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Address unexpected issues during construction project execution.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Problems on a live site are half solved by seeing what has actually happened and talking it through on the spot.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing construction projects to ensure timely completion
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Manage construction projects to ensure timely completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Programme tracking is well supported by software, but keeping a build on time means chasing people and being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing engineering activities in compliance with regulatory requirements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/04
Source: “Implement engineering activities in compliance with regulatory requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Delivering engineering work to the rules means doing it in the real world, with software supporting the compliance paperwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting data, maps or other information at construction-related public hearings or meetings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: data, maps or other information, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Present data, maps, or other information at construction-related public hearings or meetings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Public hearings require a person in the room answering questions, though the maps and data can be prepared digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing junior engineers in technical projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles junior engineers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Direct junior engineers in technical projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing junior engineers is about judgement, feedback and confidence built in person, which software cannot supply.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing specific sections of projects to ensure timely completion
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specific sections of projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Oversee specific sections of projects to ensure timely completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress tracking is easy to automate, but keeping a section of work moving means chasing teams and seeing the job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and maintaining professional relationships with clients and media sales companies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles professional relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2121/06
Source: “Develop and maintain professional relationships with clients and media sales companies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Client and supplier relationships are built on trust between particular people over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Engaging in design meetings to plan building projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles design meetings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Engage in design meetings to plan building projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking part in a design meeting is a live human activity; software can only prepare material and write up decisions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with technical specialists on specific projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technical specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Collaborate with technical specialists on specific projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working alongside other specialists depends on live discussion; software can support it with notes and analysis but not replace it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Recognizing and evaluating the effectiveness of risk and safety leadership behaviours
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the effectiveness of risk well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Recognize and evaluate the effectiveness of risk and safety leadership behaviours.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (4–28 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Judging how well leaders behave around risk relies on watching people, which is rarely written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Presenting environmental impact statements and right-of-way descriptions in public forums
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental impact statements, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2121/02
Source: “Present environmental impact statements and right-of-way descriptions in public forums.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The statement can be drafted by software, but facing a public meeting and answering objections has to be done by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Charting surface areas using global positioning systems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surface areas, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Chart surface areas using global positioning systems (GPS).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The measuring is done by walking or flying the ground with equipment, while turning readings into a chart is automatic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting or directing mining experiments to test or prove research findings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: experiments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Conduct or direct mining experiments to test or prove research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Experiments need physical trials with real materials, although designing them and analysing results is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the maintenance and repair of facility infrastructure to ensure operational efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the maintenance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/05
Source: “Oversee the maintenance and repair of facility infrastructure to ensure operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping a salon's fittings working means checking them in person and arranging tradespeople.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting water resource proposals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: water resource proposals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Present water resource proposals to government, public interest, and community groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can prepare the proposal, but standing in front of community groups and answering their concerns is a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting out the construction site layout
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the construction site layout, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Set out the construction site layout.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The setting-out calculations can be automated, but the marks are put on the ground by people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting regular meetings with product developers to discuss project progress
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles regular meetings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2121/01
Source: “Conduct regular meetings with product developers to discuss project progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress meetings depend on developers talking openly with someone they know.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Logging well and borehole drilling activity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: well, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Log well and borehole drilling activity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Describing what comes out of a borehole means examining it at the rig, although the record itself is entered digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles CAD technicians and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Supervise engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Checking and guiding technicians' drawing work depends on an experienced person coaching them directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with other businesses to pursue mutual goals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles other businesses and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2121/06
Source: “Collaborate with other businesses to pursue mutual goals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Partnerships between organisations are built on relationships between people, though software can prepare the material behind them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining relationships with existing clients to ensure continued service
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2121/06
Source: “Maintain relationships with existing clients to ensure continued service.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients stay because of the relationship with the person looking after them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Communicating and negotiating with engineers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles engineers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Communicate and negotiate with engineers, clients, subcontractors, and regulatory bodies to manage stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (8–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Negotiating across contractors, clients and regulators depends on live relationships, though software can prepare positions and keep records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Applying rail civil engineering skills to support the performance and operation of the business
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rail civil engineering skills, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2121/02, 2121/05
Source: “Apply rail civil engineering skills to support the performance and operation of the business.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (0–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: This covers hands-on railway engineering across the network, where much of the skill is practical and learned on the job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Negotiating the sale, lease or development of property
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the sale, lease or development of property and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Negotiate the sale, lease, or development of property.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Property negotiation turns on reading the other side and building trust in the room, which software cannot do for you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Promoting Health and Safety compliance and developing a culture of safe working practices
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles health and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Promote Health and Safety compliance and develop a culture of safe working practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (8–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Changing how people behave on site depends on visible leadership from someone they respect, not on written material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the repair of electrical and mechanical systems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the repair of electrical and mechanical systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Oversee the repair of electrical and mechanical systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Overseeing repairs means being where the equipment is, with software helping mainly with scheduling and records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Rigorouslying apply security procedures in transportation services
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: security procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Rigorously apply security procedures in transportation services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Security procedures must be carried out by people in the right places, even though the procedures themselves are written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating development activities of workers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: development activities of workers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2121/03
Source: “Coordinate development activities of workers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating what people do day to day depends on knowing them and being around, though schedules can be drafted automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adhering to health and safety requirements in the workplace
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/01, 2121/05
Source: “Adhere to health and safety requirements in the workplace.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Following safety rules is about how you behave in a real workplace, not a document software can produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing and coordinating contractor activities in construction projects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: contractor activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Oversee and coordinate contractor activities in construction projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating contractors happens on site and depends on working relationships, with software helping mainly on schedules and records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing the work of subcontractors to ensure quality control
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the work of subcontractors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Manage the work of subcontractors to ensure quality control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Managing subcontractors happens on site and rests on relationships, though the quality records themselves are easily kept digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Mitigating risks during ground investigation and construction processes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: risks during ground investigation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/02
Source: “Mitigate risks during ground investigation and construction processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reducing real risks on a live site needs someone present and answerable, though the risk registers behind it are desk documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Building and maintaining valuable relationships with clients to enhance business partnerships
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles valuable relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2121/02
Source: “Build and maintain valuable relationships with clients to enhance business partnerships.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The client relationship is the work, and customers deal with a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring the delivery and quality of construction materials to ensure project specifications are met
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the delivery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Monitor the delivery and quality of construction materials to ensure project specifications are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking delivered materials on a construction site means being on that site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working collaboratively in teams and maintaining professional working relationships with colleagues and external stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Work collaboratively in teams and maintain professional working relationships with colleagues and external stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working relationships with colleagues and outside partners are built between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing teams to ensure efficient water extraction from wells and rivers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: teams, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Manage teams to ensure efficient water extraction from wells and rivers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running abstraction operations means directing people at real sites, though the monitoring data behind it is digital.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting materials, products and installations to check for specification conformance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: materials, products and installations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Inspect materials, products, and installations to check for specification conformance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking what has actually been built or delivered means physically examining it; software only helps record and compare the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing boiler water quality or arranging for testing
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: boiler water quality, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2121/01
Source: “Test boiler water quality or arrange for testing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking and testing a water sample is hands-on, though arranging and recording the testing is straightforward desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing samples of bedrock, soil, groundwater and additional materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of bedrock, soil, groundwater and additional materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/02
Source: “Analyse samples of bedrock, soil, groundwater, and additional materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sample analysis happens in a laboratory with the material in hand; only interpreting the results afterwards is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing samples using scientific instruments to determine chemical composition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/02
Source: “Analyse samples using scientific instruments to determine chemical composition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running samples through laboratory instruments needs the material and the machine in the same room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: project sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Inspect project sites to monitor progress and ensure conformance to design specifications and safety or sanitation standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Site inspection is about seeing what has actually been built, which means standing there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Meeting with members of the public to understand their queries
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: members of the public, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Meet with members of the public to understand their queries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Meeting people face to face to hear their concerns is the point of the task, and software cannot substitute.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting completed transportation projects to ensure compliance with environmental regulations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: completed transportation projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Inspect completed transportation projects to ensure compliance with environmental regulations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a finished project matches its environmental conditions means walking the site and looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising and coordinating activities of technicians and technical assistants
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities of technicians, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Supervise and coordinate activities of technicians and technical assistants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising technicians is a person-to-person job built on knowing their work, though task lists can be drafted automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting field surveys to analyse project site details
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Conduct field surveys to analyse project site details.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Gathering site detail means walking the ground with instruments; only the write-up afterwards can be done at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring geological activities underground to ensure safety and operational efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: geological activities underground, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Monitor geological activities underground to ensure safety and operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Some monitoring is by remote sensors, but underground safety checks must be made by people the law requires to be qualified.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting water quality monitoring or sampling to ensure compliance with standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: water quality, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/06
Source: “Conduct water quality monitoring or sampling to ensure compliance with standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Regulatory samples must be taken at the right place by an accredited person, though the results are handled digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting and analysing samples of wastewater for quality control purposes using testing equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples of wastewater, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Collect and analyse samples of wastewater for quality control purposes using testing equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking and testing wastewater samples needs someone at the works with the equipment; only the reporting is desk work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating for water rights with communities or water facilities to meet water supply demands
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for water rights, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Negotiate for water rights with communities or water facilities to meet water supply demands.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Abstraction agreements are settled through negotiation between people, and the licensing responsibility sits with named, accountable parties.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Consulting with people affected by flood defence plans
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: people, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/06
Source: “Consult with people affected by flood defence plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (4–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Talking to residents whose homes might flood depends on trust built face to face, which software cannot provide.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring and commissioning plant and systems to ensure operational efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plant, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Monitor and commission plant and systems to ensure operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Commissioning plant means being there while it is switched on and adjusted, with software supporting the records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out site surveys to assess mineral resources
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site surveys, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Carry out site surveys to assess mineral resources.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Resource surveys involve going out to the ground with equipment, with the interpretation done afterwards at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring the site's health and safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the site's health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Ensure the site's health and safety, with a focus on ventilation issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Managing ventilation and site safety means being on site to judge the actual conditions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting methane gas checks to ensure breathing quality of air
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: methane gas checks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Conduct methane gas checks to ensure breathing quality of air.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Gas checks need instruments at the location, though fixed monitoring and telemetry now do much of the measuring.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Disposing of waste in a safe and appropriate manner
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: waste, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Dispose of waste in a safe and appropriate manner.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Getting waste into the right container and the paperwork done is partly physical handling, with the record-keeping easily automated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing on-site quality control
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site quality control, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Oversee on-site quality control.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: On-site quality control depends on watching the work being done and challenging it there and then.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing site and ground investigations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Oversee site and ground investigations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Supervising drilling and trial pits means being on site with the crews, though the resulting records are handled at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating the installation of mining and oilfield equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the installation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Coordinate the installation of mining and oilfield equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Coordinating an installation means being on site as it happens, though the schedules behind it are desk documents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Reclaiming mine sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: mine sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Reclaim mine sites.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Restoring a worked-out site is earthmoving on the ground, with the design and permissions done beforehand at a desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing preparation and storage of sludge in treatment facilities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: preparation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/06
Source: “Manage preparation and storage of sludge in treatment facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handling and storing sludge is plant operation carried out at the works, with regulated limits someone must answer for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Solving technical issues at drill sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: technical issues, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Solve technical issues at drill sites, including unexpected structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sorting out surprises at a drill rig means being there to see the problem, and much know-how is unwritten.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Modifying mining and oiling field tools applying engineering principles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: field tools applying engineering principles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Modify mining and oil field tools applying engineering principles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Adapting tools means working with the actual equipment, and much of the knowledge sits with people who use it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Ensuring the safety of mining equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the safety of mining equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/03
Source: “Ensure the safety of mining equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Equipment safety must be checked on the machine by a person the law requires to be appointed and qualified.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing and maintaining protective and rescue equipment and safety devices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: protective, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/03
Source: “Design and maintain protective and rescue equipment and safety devices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rescue gear must be physically maintained and certified by people the safety rules require to be qualified.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Examining structures at risk of collapse to assess their structural integrity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: structures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/04, 2121/05
Source: “Examine structures at risk of collapse to assess their structural integrity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a building might fall down means inspecting it in person, with a qualified engineer answerable for the verdict.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing a team comprising engineering geologists
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a team comprising engineering geologists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2121/04
Source: “Oversee a team comprising engineering geologists, geotechnical engineers, consultants, and contractors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading a mixed team of specialists and contractors runs on personal authority and trust that software cannot supply.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing construction workers to ensure structural integrity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction workers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/04
Source: “Oversee construction workers to ensure structural integrity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking that construction matches the design means being on site while the work happens, with an engineer answerable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting tracks, carriages and engines for defects and to determine service needs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tracks, carriages and engines, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Inspect tracks, carriages, and engines for defects and to determine service needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Defect inspection is done by examining the actual track or vehicle, by someone the safety rules require to be certified.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Surveying unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/05
Source: “Survey unsafe buildings, giving advice or approving their demolition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Deciding a building must come down means inspecting it and holding the legal authority to make that call.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing construction of decentralised wastewater treatment systems and reclaimed water facilities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: construction of decentralised wastewater treatment systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Oversee construction of decentralised wastewater treatment systems and reclaimed water facilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Overseeing a build means being on site checking work as it goes in, with an engineer accountable for installations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising the operation and maintenance of water and sewage infrastructure
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the operation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/06
Source: “Supervise the operation and maintenance of water and sewage infrastructure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping treatment works and sewers running requires teams on the ground, with a responsible person overseeing them in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing health and safety matters on site
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/01
Source: “Manage health and safety matters on site.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping people safe on a working site means being there and being answerable for it, so software only helps with paperwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading and motivating project teams to ensure construction project success
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/01
Source: “Lead and motivate project teams to ensure construction project success.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Motivating a team depends entirely on a real person the team knows and trusts; software cannot stand in for that.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Supervising more junior team members
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles more junior team members and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2121/02
Source: “Supervise more junior team members, depending on level of seniority.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Developing junior engineers depends on a real person who knows them, so software adds little beyond admin support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Overseeing on-site professionals to ensure project compliance and efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site professionals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/02
Source: “Oversee on-site professionals to ensure project compliance and efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 2 out of 100 (0–6 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Overseeing people working on site requires being there with them, which software cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing staff activities across different sections of a mine
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff activities across different sections of a mine, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2121/03
Source: “Oversee staff activities across different sections of a mine.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 1 out of 100 (0–5 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising underground operations requires being present and legally responsible for the people working there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Managing the site on a day-to-day basis
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the site, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/01
Source: “Manage the site on a day-to-day basis, including supervising the labour force.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a site day to day means being physically there with the workforce, which no software can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Installing controls for heating, ventilation and lighting systems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: controls, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Install controls for heating, ventilation, and lighting systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fitting control equipment into a building is hands-on work that has to be done in place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leveling the site to prepare for construction
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the site, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Level the site to prepare for construction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Levelling ground is machine and manual work on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Surveying the site to ensure accuracy in layout
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the site, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/01
Source: “Survey the site to ensure accuracy in layout.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking that the layout on the ground matches the drawings means standing on the site with survey instruments.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting fuel valves or controls to maintain required temperatures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fuel valves, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2121/01
Source: “Adjust fuel valves or controls to maintain required temperatures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Turning valves and adjusting controls is physical work done at the plant itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Taking necessary corrective action, such as adding chemicals to prevent corrosion and harmful deposits
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: necessary corrective action, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2121/01
Source: “Take necessary corrective action, such as adding chemicals to prevent corrosion and harmful deposits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Adding chemicals to a system is a hands-on job at the plant, even though the decision behind it is technical.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating stationary engines to supply steam or heat for buildings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: stationary engines, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2121/01
Source: “Operate stationary engines to supply steam or heat for buildings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running plant of this kind means being at the machinery to operate and watch it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing rock, soil and water samples for testing
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rock, soil and water samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/02
Source: “Prepare rock, soil and water samples for testing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Preparing samples is physical laboratory work done with the material itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in surveying to establish reference points
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surveying, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/02, 2121/04
Source: “Participate in surveying to establish reference points, levels, or elevations for construction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting out levels and reference points is done standing on the site with survey equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collecting samples for geological exploration projects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2121/03
Source: “Collect samples for geological exploration projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Collecting rock and soil samples means being out in the field picking them up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Filling in disused mine shafts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: disused mine shafts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Fill in disused mine shafts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Capping and filling an old shaft is physical work carried out at the shaft itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising mine construction operations, including shafts and tunnels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: mine construction operations, including shafts and tunnels, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2121/03
Source: “Supervise mine construction operations, including shafts and tunnels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising shaft and tunnel work means being underground with the people doing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Installing renew, enhance and modifying railway infrastructure to meet operational requirements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: renew, enhance and modifying railway infrastructure, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2121/05
Source: “Install, renew, enhance, and modify railway infrastructure to meet operational requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Renewing track and railway equipment is physical work carried out on the ground during possessions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Installing, replacing or maintaining assets to specification
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: assets, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2121/05
Source: “Install, replace, or maintain assets to specification.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Installing and maintaining equipment is hands-on work done at the asset itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £51,400a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 94,100in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: cost estimates in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: calculating cost estimates for labour and materials and checking construction plans. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where a team of engineers gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Calculating cost estimates for labour and materials is going; supervising a team of engineers and technicians is not.

So, given all that: 24% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 22% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 54% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 302 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (supervising a team of engineers and technicians) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles supervising a team of engineers and technicians, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to civil engineers (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was construction project managers and related professionals: only about 4% of its durable work is work you already do. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 37/100 here, with only 24% of the task list in the top band, and “assess transport systems to determine need for modification or expansion” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Construction project managers and related professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “oversee on-site quality control”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
CAD, drawing and architectural technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already supervise a team of engineers and technicians, and their equivalent is to supervise engineering or CAD technicians in their tasks. Across both published task lists that is about 3% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £35,221 against your £51,366, 31.4% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Building and civil engineering technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “analyse samples of bedrock, soil, groundwater, and additional materials”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 2% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £37,229 against your £51,366, 27.5% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 20,100 of those jobs against 94,100 of yours (ONS via Nomis), 21% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 24% of its task weight, across 302 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Civil Engineers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Civil Engineers, Mining and Geological Engineers, Including Mining Safety Engineers and Petroleum Engineers. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for civil engineers, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 24% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for civil engineers. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for civil engineers launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for civil engineers yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for civil engineers existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for civil engineers launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Civil engineers?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 302 official task statements scored for Civil engineers (United Kingdom, SOC 2121), 24% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 37 out of 100 (range 31–43, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Civil engineers” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders” (93/100, very high); “Calculate cost estimates for labour and materials” (93/100, very high); “Maintain records of budgets” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Civil engineers” stay human?: About 54% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Install, replace, or maintain assets to specification” (0/100, minimal); “Install, renew, enhance, and modify railway infrastructure to meet operational requirements” (0/100, minimal); “Supervise mine construction operations, including shafts and tunnels” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Civil engineers” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 24% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 54% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Civil engineers calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 302 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
46 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.