Will AI replace IT business analysts, architects and systems designers?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 238 official task statements scored for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers (United Kingdom, SOC 2133), 62% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 62 out of 100 (range 57–69, band: high). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

What should someone working in “IT business analysts, architects and systems designers” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 62% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 16% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 238 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

IT business analysts, architects and systems designers

analysing client's business processes and recommending solutions for their problems and needs, demonstrating database technical functionality, including performance, security and reliability and managing and evaluating projects to ensure they meet objectives within budget and timeline. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

Most tasks in this job are the kind AI has learned to do: analysing large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights. The tasks, though, are not you.

Your move: three real directions from here ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 62%
changing shape: 23%
staying human: 16%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 62 out of 100 (57–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, across 238 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for it business analysts, architects and systems designers is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

It would be a lie to soften that; demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change is what this work rebuilds around. The routes below start from it.

Your week, as this page understands it

IT business analysts, architects and systems designers proviide advice on the effective utilisation of IT and design IT systems in order to meet the business objectives or to enhance the business effectiveness of the organisation. The job title says “it business analysts”, “architects” or “systems designers”: officially one job, several names. The real job is the part underneath: demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But it business analysts, architects and systems designers is not one task. It is 238 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 62%
changing shape: 23%
staying human: 16%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

57 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

147 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Examining existing IT systems to assess their efficiency
This is reading one thing and writing another: IT systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04, 2133/05
Source: “Examine existing IT systems to assess their efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing how well existing systems perform uses data these tools read easily, though local context shapes the verdict.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing business and technical requirements to select and specify appropriate technology solutions
This is reading one thing and writing another: business in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Analyse business and technical requirements to select and specify appropriate technology solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Matching requirements to technology options is well supported by these tools, with a specialist confirming the fit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing business processes to identify opportunities for improvement
This is reading one thing and writing another: business processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Analyse business processes to identify opportunities for improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping how a process works and where it could improve is well-documented analysis software produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights
This is reading one thing and writing another: large-scale data sets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Analyse large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding patterns in large datasets is one of the strongest things these tools do, working directly on workplace data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

53 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Designing and maintaining secure network infrastructure solutions
The software now makes the first pass at secure network infrastructure solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Design and maintain secure network infrastructure solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Network design is desk work tools support well, but maintaining live infrastructure sometimes means being on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying strategic practice to technology solutions development
The software now makes the first pass at strategic practice, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Apply strategic practice to technology solutions development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Strategy can be drafted, but applying it to a particular organisation needs inside knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with programmers and developers to build the systems
The software now makes the first pass at programmers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Work with programmers and developers to build the systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building systems alongside developers is collaborative work tools assist with rather than replace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

38 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Presenting technology solution plans and proposals to senior stakeholders
The value here is that a specific person handles technology solution plans and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Present technology solution plans and proposals to senior stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The proposal drafts easily, but presenting to senior stakeholders and answering them is a live performance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change
The value here is that a specific person handles leadership and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Demonstrate leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading people through change depends on trust built face to face, something software cannot supply.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading technology-based business change programs to achieve improved productivity and functionality
The value here is that a specific person handles technology-based business change programs and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Lead technology-based business change programs to achieve improved productivity and functionality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading a business change programme rests on trust and influence with colleagues, which software cannot carry.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 228 tasks

Identifying best practice in AI data systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: best practice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/01
Source: “Identify best practice in AI data systems, data structures, and data architecture.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting established good practice in data systems is exactly what tools trained on technical writing do reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring networks to ensure availability to system users
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: networks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/01
Source: “Monitor networks to ensure availability to system users.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Network monitoring already runs largely on software watching live data, so this is well within reach of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing data models for metadata tables
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/02
Source: “Develop data models for metadata tables, views, and related database structures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building data models from an existing schema is routine, structured work these tools handle very reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing data models
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/02
Source: “Develop data models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing a data model from documented requirements is structured work that these tools do to a professional standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Correcting errors in programmes or databases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: errors in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Correct errors in programmes or databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding and fixing faults in code and databases is something these tools now do to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting and communicating database schemas using accepted notations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database schemas in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Document and communicate database schemas using accepted notations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up a schema in standard notation is well-defined, repeatable work these tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting database architectures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database architectures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Document database architectures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Documenting an existing database architecture is exactly the kind of structured writing these tools handle very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying and evaluating industry trends in database systems for senior management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: industry trends in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Identify and evaluate industry trends in database systems for senior management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking and summarising database industry trends draws on published material, which these tools cover thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining archived procedures, procedural codes or queries for applications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: archived procedures, procedural codes or queries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Maintain archived procedures, procedural codes, or queries for applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping archived code, queries and procedures in order is routine maintenance software manages.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining database queries for application processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database queries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Maintain database queries for application processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing and maintaining database queries against a known schema is among the most reliable things these tools do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing and coding logical and physical database descriptions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: logical in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Write and code logical and physical database descriptions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing database descriptions in code is structured, well-documented work these tools produce to a professional standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying identifiers of database to management system
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: identifiers of database in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/02
Source: “Specify identifiers of database to management system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Specifying database identifiers is precise, rule-based work that these tools handle accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing data to support decision-making processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/03
Source: “Analyse data to support decision-making processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data to inform a decision is one of the clearest strengths of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Configuring stored procedures to enforce business rules using middleware technologies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: stored procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Configure stored procedures to enforce business rules using middleware technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing stored procedures from stated business rules is routine coding that these tools do to a professional standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing data extraction procedures from systems like administration
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data extraction procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Implement data extraction procedures from systems like administration, billing, or claims.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building extraction routines from known systems is structured coding work tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying the structure, accuracy or quality of warehouse data
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the structure, accuracy or quality of warehouse data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Verify the structure, accuracy, or quality of warehouse data.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking data structure and quality against rules is exactly the sort of systematic work these tools excel at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing new programmes to meet customer requirements using current programming languages
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Write new programmes to meet customer requirements using current programming languages.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing new programs in current languages is now something these tools do to a standard developers accept with light edits.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing scripts for integration testing of data warehouses
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scripts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Write scripts for integration testing of data warehouses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing integration test scripts is repetitive, well-patterned coding these tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing functional or technical documentation for data warehouses
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: functional in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/03
Source: “Prepare functional or technical documentation for data warehouses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical documentation written from a known data model is writing software produces to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of installation activities to ensure system integrity and compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of installation activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Maintain records of installation activities to ensure system integrity and compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping accurate records of installation work is structured administrative writing these tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring system operation to detect potential problems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system operation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Monitor system operation to detect potential problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Watching system behaviour for early signs of trouble is already largely automated and well suited to these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Logging detailed steps and rationale behind decisions in project management
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed steps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Log detailed steps and rationale behind decisions in project management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording decisions and reasoning is structured written work these tools do accurately and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and documenting software development lifecycles for project planning
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software development lifecycles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/05
Source: “Analyse and document software development lifecycles for project planning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Documenting how software gets built is structured written work these tools produce to a professional standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating user manuals to ensure the best use of new systems or products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: user manuals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Create user manuals to ensure the best use of new systems or products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: User manuals are structured, well-patterned writing that these tools produce to a high standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing program and system malfunctions to restore normal functioning
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: program in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Diagnose program and system malfunctions to restore normal functioning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing software and system faults from logs and code is something these tools now do very capably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drawing up testing schedules for complete systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: testing schedules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Draw up testing schedules for complete systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a testing schedule from a system's requirements is structured planning work these tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Mapping and documenting interfaces between legacy and new systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: interfaces in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Map and document interfaces between legacy and new systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping and documenting interfaces between systems is systematic, rule-based work these tools do accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and overseeing the daily performance of computer systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the daily performance of computer systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Monitor and oversee the daily performance of computer systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Watching daily system performance is already largely automated and well suited to these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing written documentation to support IT business analysis work
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: written documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Produce written documentation to support IT business analysis work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing analysis documentation is structured written work these tools handle to a professional standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing to find problems before the system goes live
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: find problems before the system goes live in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Test to find problems before the system goes live.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Testing to find problems before go-live is systematic work these tools now perform very effectively.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing down what the business does and how
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: what the business in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Write down what the business does and how.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing down how the business works is structured documentation these tools produce well from gathered material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing instruction manuals for new or upgraded products and systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: instruction manuals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Write instruction manuals for new or upgraded products and systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing instruction manuals from product information is highly structured writing software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing software system testing and validation procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software system in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Develop software system testing and validation procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing testing and validation procedures is systematic, well-patterned work these tools produce reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using AI and data analysis skills to develop digital solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: AI in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Use AI and data analysis skills to develop digital solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Using AI and data analysis to build digital solutions is squarely what these tools are designed to do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing multiple potential solutions to the design brief using ideation tools and techniques
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: multiple potential solutions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Develop multiple potential solutions to the design brief using ideation tools and techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Generating a wide range of solution ideas from a brief is one of these tools' strongest abilities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Write detailed reports on project progress for stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reports are written from information already recorded, which software does quickly and well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing software for computer operation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2133/01
Source: “Design software for computer operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software design is heavily documented online, so tools produce workable designs, but a developer refines them for the real system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing databases for business applications with focus on scalability and security
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/02
Source: “Design databases for business applications with focus on scalability and security.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Database design patterns are abundantly documented, so tools produce strong designs that an architect reviews for scale and security.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing logical and maintainable software solutions in line with given specifications to meet the design requirements and organisational coding standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: logical in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Write logical and maintainable software solutions in line with given specifications to meet the design requirements and organisational coding standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing maintainable code to a specification and coding standards is exactly what these tools do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing designs, codes, test plans or documentation to ensure quality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: designs, codes, test plans or documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/03
Source: “Review designs, codes, test plans, or documentation to ensure quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing code, tests and documentation against standards is systematic checking software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assessing current technologies considering cost
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current technologies considering cost in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/04
Source: “Assess current technologies considering cost, portability, compatibility, and usability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing technologies on cost and compatibility draws on abundant public information these tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Comparing 'off-the-shelf' solutions with building a new IT system to determine the most efficient option
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: 'off-the-shelf' solutions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Compare 'off-the-shelf' solutions with building a new IT system to determine the most efficient option.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weighing off-the-shelf products against building your own uses widely published information these tools compare well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing application-specific software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: application-specific software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Develop application-specific software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing application software is well documented with abundant public examples to draw on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Investigating system component suitability for specified purposes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system component suitability in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Investigate system component suitability for specified purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking whether a component suits a purpose draws on published specifications these tools search thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Applying engineering principles to the software development process
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: principles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Apply engineering principles to the software development process, including requirements analysis and design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Requirements analysis and design are heavily documented disciplines, so tools produce strong work engineers refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing high-quality software solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: high-quality software solutions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Design high-quality software solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software design is abundantly documented, so these tools produce solid solutions that developers refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using multimedia and Internet technology in software development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: multimedia in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Use multimedia and Internet technology in software development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Web and multimedia development is abundantly documented, so tools produce strong work developers refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Applying systems development knowledge in creating digital solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems development knowledge in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2133/06
Source: “Apply systems development knowledge in creating digital solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Systems development knowledge is abundantly documented, so tools produce solid solutions a specialist refines.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Using cyber security knowledge to enhance digital solution security
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cyber security knowledge in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Use cyber security knowledge to enhance digital solution security.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Security practice is abundantly documented, so tools suggest strong improvements that a specialist verifies.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing software systems using scientific analysis and mathematical models
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Design software systems using scientific analysis and mathematical models.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mathematical and analytical software design is abundantly documented, so tools produce solid work engineers refine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Detecting and mitigating network security vulnerabilities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: network security vulnerabilities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Detect and mitigate network security vulnerabilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Vulnerability detection is well documented and heavily tool-assisted, though fixes need a specialist's confirmation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Carrying out a security risk assessment on a basic IT system to identify threats and offer recommendations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a security risk assessment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Carry out a security risk assessment on a basic IT system to identify threats and offer recommendations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (74–88 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing a basic system for threats follows published checklists these tools apply thoroughly, with staff confirming findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating work results through written reports or oral presentations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: work results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Communicate work results through written reports or oral presentations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (72–86 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Written reports are produced very well by these tools, though delivering them aloud remains human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining the possible effects of changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the possible effects of changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Explain the possible effects of changes, such as the costs, benefits and risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (72–86 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out costs, benefits and risks in writing is well within these tools' reach, though the discussion is human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting findings to stakeholders to facilitate informed business decisions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Report findings to stakeholders to facilitate informed business decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (72–86 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: The written findings are easily produced, though presenting them to stakeholders remains a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing problems to develop solutions involving computer hardware and software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: problems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2133/01
Source: “Analyse problems to develop solutions involving computer hardware and software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out a technical fix from a described problem is something these tools do well, though an engineer still checks the detail.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing scalable real-time analytical solutions for business problems using AI and related technologies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scalable real-time analytical solutions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/01
Source: “Design scalable real-time analytical solutions for business problems using AI and related technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing analytics systems is well covered by these tools, but a specialist tunes the design to the business's real data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and architecting robust data sourcing and processing systems for the organisation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: robust data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/01
Source: “Develop and architect robust data sourcing and processing systems for the organisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Data pipeline architecture follows well-known patterns tools reproduce, though the organisation's own sources still need human design decisions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Criticallying evaluate and synthesise AI research findings to apply them within an organisational context
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: evaluate in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/01
Source: “Critically evaluate and synthesise AI research findings to apply them within an organisational context.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading and summarising research is a strong point for these tools; applying it to this organisation needs a specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing technical roadmaps for data life-cycles ensuring appropriate support and business processes are in place
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical roadmaps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/01
Source: “Design technical roadmaps for data life-cycles ensuring appropriate support and business processes are in place.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Roadmaps for handling data follow familiar patterns, so tools draft them well, though local processes need human checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Optimising mechanisms for accessing and analysing complex datasets to deliver business outcomes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: mechanisms in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/01
Source: “Optimise mechanisms for accessing and analysing complex datasets to deliver business outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Query and access tuning is well documented, so tools suggest strong improvements that an engineer confirms against the live system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the feasibility of plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the feasibility of plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/01
Source: “Evaluate the feasibility of plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Feasibility checks follow documented methods, so tools produce a solid assessment, though local knowledge sharpens the conclusion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning work tasks and timelines to meet deadlines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: work tasks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2133/01
Source: “Plan work tasks and timelines to meet deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning tasks and timelines is well suited to these tools, though realistic dates depend on knowing the team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing database architectural strategies at modelling
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database architectural strategies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/02
Source: “Develop database architectural strategies at modelling, design, and implementation stages for business requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Architectural strategy needs choices about the business's priorities, though tools draft most of the design work convincingly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing load-balancing processes to eliminate downtime for backup processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/02
Source: “Develop load-balancing processes to eliminate downtime for backup processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Load balancing follows well-published patterns, so tools draft the process, with an engineer confirming it against real traffic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Enforcing database development standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database development standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/02
Source: “Enforce database development standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking work against written development standards is routine, and tools can do much of that review automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing methods to integrate different products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Develop methods to integrate different products, ensuring compatibility, such as customising commercial databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Integrating products and customising databases is documented engineering work with strong tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing optimum values for database parameters
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: optimum values in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Establish optimum values for database parameters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tuning database settings is well documented, so tools suggest good values that an administrator verifies on the live system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying, evaluating and recommending hardware or software technologies to achieve desired database performance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: hardware in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Identify, evaluate and recommend hardware or software technologies to achieve desired database performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommending technology needs knowledge of the existing estate and budgets, though tools produce a strong comparison to start from.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Installing and testing new versions of the database management system
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new versions of the database management system in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Install and test new versions of the database management system (DBMS).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Installing and testing database software is scriptable and well documented, though someone still oversees the live upgrade.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting up data recovery processes for data architecture
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data recovery processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Set up data recovery processes for data architecture.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recovery procedures follow published patterns tools reproduce well, though testing them properly needs an engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Setting up database clusters
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database clusters in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Set up database clusters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up clusters is largely scripted and well documented, with an engineer confirming behaviour on the real environment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating and selecting digital products and technologies to improve business efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: digital products in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Evaluate and select digital products and technologies to improve business efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing products against requirements is well suited to these tools, with a specialist confirming the fit for this business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing system performance or operational requirements to optimise data processing workflows
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system performance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/03
Source: “Analyse system performance or operational requirements to optimise data processing workflows.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Performance analysis works from logs and metrics tools read well, though tuning choices need engineering judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing comprehensive data warehouse systems according to customer requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: comprehensive data warehouse systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/03
Source: “Design comprehensive data warehouse systems according to customer requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Warehouse design follows documented patterns tools reproduce, with a specialist matching it to the customer's real data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing data warehouse process models
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data warehouse process models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/03
Source: “Develop data warehouse process models, including sourcing, loading, transformation, and extraction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Data loading and transformation models are standard work tools draft strongly, though the source systems need human checking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing standards for the design of data warehouse elements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/03
Source: “Develop standards for the design of data warehouse elements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design standards are written documents tools draft well, though agreeing what suits this organisation needs people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining standards for data architectures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/03
Source: “Maintain standards for data architectures, models, tools, and databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping standards current is documentation work tools support strongly, with a specialist deciding what changes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Mapping data between source systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/03
Source: “Map data between source systems, data warehouses, and data marts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Mapping fields between source systems and warehouses is repetitive work software can draft, with a person confirming the tricky fields.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating data warehouse systems, balancing batch loading and resource utilisation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data warehouse systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/03
Source: “Operate data warehouse systems, balancing batch loading and resource utilisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running warehouse loads is largely automated already, though balancing resources needs an operator watching real workloads.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing metadata processes and frameworks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: metadata processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Implement metadata processes and frameworks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Metadata frameworks follow published approaches tools draft well, though fitting them to existing systems needs a specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing proposed solution designs, including system architecture
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: proposed solution designs, including system architecture in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/04
Source: “Develop proposed solution designs, including system architecture.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Solution designs follow documented architecture patterns tools draft strongly, with an architect adapting them to the estate.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing system engineering solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system engineering solutions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/04
Source: “Develop system engineering solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Engineering solutions are well documented, so tools produce a workable design that a specialist refines.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the strengths, weaknesses and costs of different options
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the strengths, weaknesses and costs of different options in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Assess the strengths, weaknesses and costs of different options.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing options on strengths, weaknesses and cost is structured analysis software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Breaking down software development activities into logical units of work to sequence and structure activities for delivering a high-quality product on the first attempt
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software development activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Break down software development activities into logical units of work to sequence and structure activities for delivering a high-quality product on the first attempt.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Breaking work into ordered units is planning that software drafts well from the specification.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining objectives, scope, issues or organisational impact of information systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: objectives, scope in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Define objectives, scope, issues, or organisational impact of information systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out scope and impact is written analysis tools do well, though organisational effects need local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining system standards to meet design constraints
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Define system standards to meet design constraints.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: System standards are documented artefacts tools draft strongly, with engineers confirming the constraints.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing requirements for security systems to ensure proper installation and operation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Establish requirements for security systems to ensure proper installation and operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Security requirements follow published standards tools draft well, though the site's real needs shape the final set.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating existing systems to determine effectiveness
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Evaluate existing systems to determine effectiveness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging system effectiveness uses measurable data tools read well, though the verdict needs knowledge of the business.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying system data, hardware or software components required to meet user needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: system data, hardware or software components in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Identify system data, hardware, or software components required to meet user needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out which components meet a stated need is comparison against documented specifications.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making recommendations on system component use for IT architecture and security
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: recommendations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Make recommendations on system component use for IT architecture and security.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommendations on components are well supported by documented specifications, though the estate's quirks need an architect.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing security analyses of developed or packaged software components
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: security analyses in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Perform security analyses of developed or packaged software components.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Security analysis of software is well documented and tool-assisted, though findings need an expert's confirmation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying stability, interoperability, portability, security and scalability of system architecture
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: stability, interoperability, portability in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Verify stability, interoperability, portability, security, and scalability of system architecture.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Verifying architecture qualities uses documented testing methods tools support well, though results need engineering judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Helping develop project budgets and timetables for IT and engineering projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: develop project budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Help develop project budgets and timetables for IT and engineering projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Budgets and timetables follow familiar formats tools draft well, though realistic figures need project experience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching and testing software patches for functionality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software patches in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Research and test software patches for functionality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching and testing patches is documented, largely automatable work, though live verification needs an engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing business models to identify IT system requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business models in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/05
Source: “Analyse business models to identify IT system requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning a business model into system requirements is analysis tools do well, though local detail needs people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Addressing product issues to improve software functionality and user experience
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: product issues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Address product issues to improve software functionality and user experience.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working through product issues to improve software is well supported by these tools, with developers confirming fixes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and integrating technical and industry developments into operational strategies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technical and industry developments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Assess and integrate technical and industry developments into operational strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking industry developments is easy for these tools, though weaving them into strategy needs business knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Considering opportunities and potential risks attached to suggestions you make
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: opportunities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Consider opportunities and potential risks attached to suggestions you make.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out the opportunities and risks in a proposal is written analysis these tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing IT solutions to enhance product functionality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: IT solutions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Develop IT solutions to enhance product functionality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building functionality improvements is well supported by these tools, with developers confirming the result works.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing plans and processes to evaluate the impact of changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Develop plans and processes to evaluate the impact of changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Impact evaluation plans follow familiar structures tools draft well, though the measures need local knowledge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Devising plans to implement and improve IT infrastructure and application change projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Devise plans to implement and improve IT infrastructure and application change projects, identifying organisational needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Change plans for IT infrastructure follow documented approaches tools draft well, though the organisation's needs shape them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs for projects to ensure budget compliance and resource allocation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Estimate costs for projects to ensure budget compliance and resource allocation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost estimates are calculations from known rates and quantities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying the processes and information technology required to introduce recommendations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Identify the processes and information technology required to introduce recommendations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Identifying the processes and technology needed is documented analysis these tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining software testing programmes to keep them up-to-date
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software testing programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Maintain software testing programmes to keep them up-to-date.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping test suites current is maintenance work software increasingly does itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Outlining findings and recommending improvements based on analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Outline findings and recommend improvements based on analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up findings and recommendations from analysis is drafting software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing detailed designs and specifications for projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed designs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Prepare detailed designs and specifications for projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Detailed designs and specifications follow documented conventions tools draft well, with a specialist confirming details.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying testing standards and procedures to assess product quality before market launch
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Specify testing standards and procedures to assess product quality before market launch.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Testing standards are documented practice software can draft for a manager to approve.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using data modelling practices to analyse findings and suggest strategic and operational improvements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data modelling practices in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Use data modelling practices to analyse findings and suggest strategic and operational improvements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Data modelling and drawing out improvements is well supported by these tools, with an analyst confirming relevance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Distinguishing, analysing and documenting business requirements and managing those requirements throughout a project life cycle
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: business requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2133/06
Source: “Distinguish, analyse and document business requirements and manage those requirements throughout a project life cycle.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Documenting and tracking requirements is structured work tools support strongly, though changes are agreed with people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing specific user requirements to inform software development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specific user requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Analyse specific user requirements to inform software development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing stated user requirements is structured written work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing software systems to predict outcomes of design
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Develop software systems to predict outcomes of design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building predictive software is well-documented work, though the modelling choices need an engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying organisational information requirements and model data solutions using conceptual data modelling techniques
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: organisational information requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Identify organisational information requirements and model data solutions using conceptual data modelling techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Conceptual data modelling follows documented techniques tools apply well, with a specialist confirming the organisation's needs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing and monitoring risk management strategies to mitigate potential risks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risk management strategies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Implement and monitor risk management strategies to mitigate potential risks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up and tracking risk management is structured, well-documented work software produces and maintains reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Repairing and modifying existing software to meet current needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Repair and modify existing software to meet current needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Repairing and adapting existing code is something software now does well with review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Storing, retrieving and manipulating data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Store, retrieve, and manipulate data for analysis of system capabilities and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling and reshaping data to answer questions about a system suits software, though deciding what to examine needs judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Upgrading existing software interfaces to improve performance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software interfaces in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Upgrade existing software interfaces to improve performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Improving existing interfaces is coding work software now does to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing information on reporting formats
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Assess information on reporting formats, costs, and security needs to determine hardware configuration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out a hardware configuration from stated requirements is documented technical analysis tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying power supply requirements and configuration
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: power supply requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Specify power supply requirements and configuration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out power requirements from equipment specifications is documented technical calculation these tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting and presenting effective research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: effective research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Conduct and present effective research using engaging, well-structured approaches.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (63–77 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Research and well-structured write-ups are strongly supported by these tools, though presenting it stays human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assessing and quantifying risks, limitations and biases of AI applications within specific business contexts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risks, limitations and biases of AI applications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/01
Source: “Assess and quantify risks, limitations, and biases of AI applications within specific business contexts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tools can draft a solid risk write-up, though someone accountable in the business must judge what really applies here.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring systems comply
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Ensure systems comply with technical, security, and data standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking systems against security and data standards is documented work tools do well, with accountable staff confirming compliance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing ethical and legal implications of digital and technology solutions and making recommendations as a result of this analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: ethical in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Analyse ethical and legal implications of digital and technology solutions and make recommendations as a result of this analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out ethical and legal implications is written analysis tools do well, though accountable staff confirm the position.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborativelying maintain technical standards in AI solutions for the organisation and its customers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: maintain technical standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/01
Source: “Collaboratively maintain technical standards in AI solutions for the organisation and its customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical standards are well documented so drafting is easy for tools, but agreeing them with colleagues stays human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing performance standards for work tasks to enhance productivity and quality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: performance standards in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2133/01, 2133/06
Source: “Develop performance standards for work tasks to enhance productivity and quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drafting performance standards is straightforward for these tools; agreeing them with the team stays a human conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Demonstrating database technical functionality, including performance, security and reliability
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: database technical functionality, including performance, security and reliability in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/02
Source: “Demonstrate database technical functionality, including performance, security, and reliability.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Showing that a database performs and is secure involves live demonstrations to colleagues, though the tests themselves are easily generated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Budgeting and allocating resources for the delivery of technology solutions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: resources in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Budget and allocate resources for the delivery of technology solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Budget and resource plans follow familiar formats tools draft well, though the final call rests with people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on design concepts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: design concepts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/04
Source: “Advise on design concepts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design advice is well supported by these tools, though the conversation that lands it stays human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the analysis of complete computer systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the analysis of complete computer systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Direct the analysis of complete computer systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Directing analysis means setting direction for people, though the analysis itself is well within these tools' reach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring compatibility of system components with engineers or software developers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: compatibility of system components in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Ensure compatibility of system components with engineers or software developers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compatibility checking is documented technical work tools handle well, though it is settled with colleagues.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Guiding the development and troubleshooting of IT systems to ensure operational efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the development in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Guide the development and troubleshooting of IT systems to ensure operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Guiding development and fault-finding is well supported by these tools, though steering the team is a human job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on project costs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Advise on project costs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cost advice on projects follows known estimating methods and rates, which software applies quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating project information through presentations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Communicate project information through presentations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Slides and notes are easy for these tools to produce, but standing up and presenting is a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Describing the project structure to product and service designers
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the project structure in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Describe the project structure to product and service designers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Explaining project structure to designers is a conversation, though the written description is easily drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and incorporating external stakeholder feedback to improve services and products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: external stakeholder feedback in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Analyse and incorporate external stakeholder feedback to improve services and products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sorting and acting on feedback is well suited to these tools, though the relationships behind it stay human.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating the flow of information internally or with other organisations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the flow of information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Coordinate the flow of information internally or with other organisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Coordinating information flow is well supported by these tools, though keeping people aligned needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering project briefs within budget and according to client specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project briefs within budget in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Deliver project briefs within budget and according to client specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project briefs are easy for tools to draft, though delivering to budget and client expectations needs people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting users on change control and system updates
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: users in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Support users on change control and system updates.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Guidance and update notes are easily produced, though supporting users through changes involves talking to them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing client's business processes and recommending solutions for their problems and needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: client's business processes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 95 · 2133/06
Source: “Analyse client's business processes and recommend solutions for their problems and needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Process analysis and recommendations are well supported by these tools, though client conversations shape them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing technology solutions projects through systematic planning
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: technology solutions projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Manage technology solutions projects through systematic planning, execution, and closing using industry-standard methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project plans and reports are easily produced, though keeping people to them is a human job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Leading on analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: analysis in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Lead on analysis, synthesis and interpretation of research findings to create insights and strategies to share with product teams for digital product / service development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Synthesising research into insights is well suited to these tools, though sharing and landing them involves people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing and evaluating projects to ensure they meet objectives within budget and timeline
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: projects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Manage and evaluate projects to ensure they meet objectives within budget and timeline.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Project tracking and evaluation is well supported by these tools, though keeping delivery on course involves people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing, interpreting and communicating complex research data to build a case for change
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: complex research data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Analyse, interpret, and communicate complex research data to build a case for change.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing research data and building a case for change is analysis and write-up work tools do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing new technology by applying theoretical expertise and innovation in computer applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new technology, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2133/01
Source: “Develop new technology by applying theoretical expertise and innovation in computer applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Genuinely new technology comes from human insight; tools help explore options but rarely deliver the breakthrough itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Producing tailored solutions to business problems using innovative methods
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at tailored solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2133/01
Source: “Produce tailored solutions to business problems using innovative methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Genuinely tailored, inventive solutions still lean on human insight, with tools offering starting points rather than finished answers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting methods, techniques or criteria for data warehousing evaluative procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at methods, techniques or criteria, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/03
Source: “Select methods, techniques, or criteria for data warehousing evaluative procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing evaluation methods is a judgment call about what matters to this organization, not just a documented procedure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing software engineering methodologies to improve system architecture
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at software engineering methodologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/04
Source: “Develop software engineering methodologies to improve system architecture.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Creating better ways of working takes human insight into how the team actually builds software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing efficient and effective system controllers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at efficient, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Develop efficient and effective system controllers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Controller design is specialised engineering where an expert still does most of the shaping.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing system integration strategies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at system integration strategies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Implement system integration strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Actually integrating systems takes hands-on work across live environments, with tools supporting the planning.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Configuring servers according to functional specifications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at servers, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Configure servers according to functional specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Server configuration is largely scriptable from documented specifications, though physical or data-centre work sometimes intrudes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing information to recommend and plan computer and peripheral equipment layout modifications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Analyse information to recommend and plan computer and peripheral equipment layout modifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning equipment layout is desk analysis tools do well, though the room itself has to be seen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending purchase of equipment to control dust
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at purchase of equipment, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Recommend purchase of equipment to control dust, temperature, and humidity in area of system installation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommending environmental control equipment uses published specifications, though the installation area must be assessed in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Enhancing awareness of the wider application of AI tools and technologies across the business so that opportunities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at awareness of the wider application of AI tools, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/01
Source: “Enhance awareness of the wider application of AI tools and technologies across the business so that opportunities for its use can be identified.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining where new tools could help is partly a persuasion job, though the supporting material writes itself easily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Clarifying a client's system specifications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at a client's system specifications, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Clarify a client's system specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Pinning down what a client actually wants happens in conversation, though tools help structure and write it up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to the development and ethical and legal conduct of AI systems and processes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the development, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2133/01
Source: “Contribute to the development and ethical and legal conduct of AI systems and processes, in line with organisational and regulatory requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Meeting ethical and legal duties for AI needs human judgement about the organisation's obligations, with tools helping draft the paperwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing technical authority for the business regarding emerging opportunities for AI
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical authority, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2133/01
Source: “Provide technical authority for the business regarding emerging opportunities for AI.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Being the person the business trusts on new technology is a standing role, not an output a tool can hand over.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing technical oversight for data warehousing technologies to meet business objectives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical oversight, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/01
Source: “Provide technical oversight for data warehousing technologies to meet business objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical oversight is a standing responsibility someone carries, even though tools can produce most of the underlying analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Initiating new projects in an agile environment
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new projects, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/01
Source: “Initiate new projects in an agile environment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Starting a project involves getting people moving and committing resources, which tools support rather than perform.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing their own continued personal and professional development plan
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at their own continued personal and professional development plan, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2133/01
Source: “Implement their own continued personal and professional development plan.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A personal development plan is about the individual's own choices and effort.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing digital technologies to achieve specific organisational objectives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at digital technologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2133/02, 2133/04
Source: “Implement digital technologies to achieve specific organisational objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Actually putting technology into an organisation involves coordinating people and systems, which tools assist rather than deliver.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing or coordinating troubleshooting support for data warehouses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at support, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/03
Source: “Provide or coordinate troubleshooting support for data warehouses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software helps trace warehouse faults, but coordinating a fix across teams and systems still needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting appropriate design solutions with engineers or software developers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at appropriate design solutions, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Select appropriate design solutions with engineers or software developers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing between designs is a decision taken with engineers, though tools lay out the options clearly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Proposing organisational changes to meet strategic objectives
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at organisational changes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2133/04
Source: “Propose organisational changes to meet strategic objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Change proposals can be drafted from analysis, though the recommendation needs shaping by someone who knows the organisation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring deadlines are met
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at deadlines are met, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Ensure deadlines are met.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Meeting deadlines is about chasing and organising people, though tools track and flag progress well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing the implementation of a new system and managing data migration
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the implementation of a new system, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Oversee the implementation of a new system and manage data migration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Migration steps can be scripted, though overseeing a live switchover needs someone accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing programming and documentation processes for software systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at documentation processes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Direct programming and documentation processes for software systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Directing programming work is about steering a team, though the documentation itself is easily produced.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting ideas that enhance user experience and meet the organisation's environmental and economic needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at ideas, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Select ideas that enhance user experience and meet the organisation's environmental and economic needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing which ideas to back is a judgement call about the organisation, informed by analysis tools produce.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing users with technical support for computer problems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at users, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Provide users with technical support for computer problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Common computer problems are already solved through guided help, though some need someone at the desk.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing computer hardware to optimise system performance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at computer hardware, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/01
Source: “Design computer hardware to optimise system performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Hardware design involves physical prototypes and testing, so tools contribute ideas rather than a finished board.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing implementation of network security measures to protect data integrity
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at implementation of network security measures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/01
Source: “Oversee implementation of network security measures to protect data integrity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Overseeing security work means checking real kit and real people, though tools draft the plans and checklists.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing project requests describing database user needs to estimate time and cost required to accomplish project
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at project requests describing database user needs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2133/02
Source: “Review project requests describing database user needs to estimate time and cost required to accomplish project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Estimating time and cost for a project depends on knowing the team and the existing systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with developers and managers to clarify technical issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at developers, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Collaborate with developers and managers to clarify technical issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Clarifying technical issues happens through discussion between the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adapting existing software to new hardware
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at software, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Adapt existing software to new hardware.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Porting software to new hardware needs testing on the actual equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with technicians to specify system requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technicians, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/01
Source: “Consult with technicians to specify system requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Specifications can be drafted, though pinning them down means talking to the technicians.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with users to determine computing needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at users, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/01, 2133/05
Source: “Consult with users to determine computing needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Needs are written up easily; drawing them out of users takes back-and-forth conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing requirements for new systems or modifications in consultation with staff
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at requirements, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/01
Source: “Establish requirements for new systems or modifications in consultation with staff, users, and management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Requirements are written up easily, but drawing them out of users and managers takes conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Practising continuous self-learning to keep up to date with industry trends and developments to enhance relevant skills and take responsibility for own professional development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at continuous, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/01
Source: “Practise continuous self-learning to keep up to date with industry trends and developments to enhance relevant skills and take responsibility for own professional development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Keeping your own skills current is something only the individual can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with suppliers to understand computing solutions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at suppliers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2133/01
Source: “Consult with suppliers to understand computing solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Product information is easy to gather, but supplier conversations shape what is actually on offer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating database development as part of a project team
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at database development, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Coordinate database development as part of a project team.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating a development team is about people agreeing and keeping pace, which tools support but do not replace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising senior managers on how to plan for their future IT needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at senior managers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Advise senior managers on how to plan for their future IT needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Advising senior managers involves persuasion and reading the organisation, though tools prepare much of the analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with clients to understand their needs and requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Engage with clients to understand their needs and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients explain what they actually need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing the development of new information systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the development of new information systems, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Oversee the development of new information systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Specifications and plans can be drafted automatically, though overseeing a project means working with people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting detailed requirements from clients and users for IT projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed requirements, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2133/05
Source: “Collect detailed requirements from clients and users for IT projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients and users say what they really need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying change management to technology solutions development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at change management, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05, 2133/06
Source: “Apply change management to technology solutions development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Change management is about carrying people with you, which tools support with materials rather than perform.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with managers to identify specific business needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at managers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Consult with managers to identify specific business needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Business needs are written up easily; getting managers to articulate them takes conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing with clients the information processing or computation needs a computer program will address
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients the information, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Discuss with clients the information processing or computation needs a computer program will address.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding what a client needs from a program comes out of conversation, which tools prepare for but cannot hold.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring technical compatibility and user satisfaction by collaborating with programmers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical compatibility, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Ensure technical compatibility and user satisfaction by collaborating with programmers, developers, and testers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping developers, testers and users aligned is collaborative work tools assist rather than carry out.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Helping resolve issues arising from changes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at resolve issues, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Help resolve issues arising from changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Sorting out problems after a change involves negotiating with people, though tools help analyse causes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing the project to keep it on budget
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the project, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Manage the project to keep it on budget.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Budget tracking is automatic, but keeping a project on course means pressing people for decisions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting proposals to both internal and external clients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at proposals, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Present proposals to both internal and external clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Proposal documents can be drafted quickly, though presenting and defending them in the room is a human job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with clients and colleagues on the maintenance of software systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Consult with clients and colleagues on the maintenance of software systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Maintenance decisions are worked out in discussion with the people who rely on the system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the transition from prototype to pilot projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the transition, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Direct the transition from prototype to pilot projects, collaborating with service areas and leading evaluation with clear success metrics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Moving from prototype to pilot involves persuading services to adopt it, which tools support rather than do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining information on limitations or capabilities for data processing projects by speaking with data processing or project managers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Obtain information on limitations or capabilities for data processing projects by speaking with data processing or project managers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Finding out what is actually possible means asking the managers who run the systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the installation of operating systems and application software
staying human
The ratings behind this row put the installation of operating systems well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Direct the installation of operating systems and application software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Directing installations involves people and machines in a place, though the instructions themselves are easily produced.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Understanding business or industry requirements in collaboration with system architects and software architects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles business and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/02
Source: “Understand business or industry requirements in collaboration with system architects and software architects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding what the business really needs comes from conversations with colleagues, which tools can prepare for but not hold.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Agreeing on project scope and objectives
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles project scope and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2133/02
Source: “Agree on project scope and objectives.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Agreeing scope means people reaching a shared commitment, which tools can document but not negotiate.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assisting staff and teams in implementing recommended changes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Assist staff and teams in implementing recommended changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Helping colleagues put changes into practice depends on being alongside them, not on producing a document.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Liaising with colleagues from various disciplines within and outside the organisation to ensure work is within defined parameters
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Liaise with colleagues from various disciplines within and outside the organisation to ensure work is within defined parameters.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Liaising across disciplines relies on working relationships that software cannot stand in for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying individuals and groups to advocate for a service design approach
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles individuals and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Identify individuals and groups to advocate for a service design approach.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Finding and winning over internal champions depends on knowing the organisation's people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating on projects involving virtual reality and robotics
staying human
The ratings behind this row put projects involving virtual reality well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 75 · 2133/01
Source: “Collaborate on projects involving virtual reality and robotics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Virtual reality and robotics work needs hands on kit and close teamwork, so tools mainly support the thinking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Mentoring others in the development and implementation of digital and technical solutions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Mentor others in the development and implementation of digital and technical solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Mentoring depends on a trusted relationship, though tools can supply the technical explanations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training system users in system operation
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles system users and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Train system users in system operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training users works best in person, with tools producing the materials rather than the session.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff on new or upgraded systems
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Train staff on new or upgraded systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training staff works through live sessions and questions, with tools producing the materials rather than the teaching.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff to work with computer systems and software
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Train staff to work with computer systems and software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Materials are easy to produce, but people learn systems fastest from someone showing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining and conducting research activities using qualitative and quantitative data to understand users and their needs
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles research activities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Define and conduct research activities using qualitative and quantitative data to understand users and their needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding users properly means speaking with them, though tools help design the study and analyse what comes back.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prototyping and testing with users to analyse potential solutions for service improvement
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles users and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Prototype and test with users to analyse potential solutions for service improvement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Testing with real users means arranging and running sessions with people, though tools help analyse results.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out continuous hardware and software maintenance tasks
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: continuous hardware, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Carry out continuous hardware and software maintenance tasks, including installing or upgrading hardware or software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (25–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Installing and upgrading hardware means physically handling kit, even though software updates can be automated.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting hardware or software tests to ensure system functionality
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hardware, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Conduct hardware or software tests to ensure system functionality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Testing hardware and systems often means physically connecting and observing equipment, limiting what software can do alone.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Helping address any uncertainty and concern regarding recommendations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles address any uncertainty and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Help address any uncertainty and concern regarding recommendations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (24–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Easing colleagues' worries about a recommendation depends on trust with those specific people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing services by engaging with and influencing stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles services and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Design services by engaging with and influencing stakeholders, colleagues, and service users.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (24–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Designing services with stakeholders and users depends on trust built in live sessions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising programmers in their development tasks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles programmers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Supervise programmers in their development tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (19–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising developers means managing people day to day, which software cannot take on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Acting as a link between technical teams and project delivery managers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a link and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Act as a link between technical teams and project delivery managers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Being the bridge between technical teams and managers depends on relationships built in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Convincing internal departments, partners and community groups of the benefits of proposed plans
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles internal departments and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Convince internal departments, partners, and community groups of the benefits of proposed plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Convincing departments and community groups depends on trust built in the room, which software cannot supply.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Guiding staff through the process of implementing organisational changes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Guide staff through the process of implementing organisational changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guiding staff through change works because someone they trust is alongside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Securing senior management agreement on the best method to introduce recommendations to the business
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles senior management agreement and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Secure senior management agreement on the best method to introduce recommendations to the business.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting senior managers to agree depends on standing and trust built over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Communicating effectively with a range of stakeholders
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a range of stakeholders and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2133/06
Source: “Communicate effectively with a range of stakeholders, both technical and non-technical, across all levels of influence and responsibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Communicating well with people at all levels depends on relationships and reading the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading and guiding stakeholders by questioning and challenging the design brief to determine the scope of service design work
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles stakeholders and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2133/06
Source: “Lead and guide stakeholders by questioning and challenging the design brief to determine the scope of service design work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Challenging a design brief with stakeholders depends on credibility built with those specific people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing and leading ongoing change to meet future requirements
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles change and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Manage and lead ongoing change to meet future requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Leading continuing change depends on trust and influence with colleagues over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising engineers, technicians, researchers or other staff
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles engineers, technicians, researchers or other staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Supervise engineers, technicians, researchers, or other staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising staff rests on knowing individual people and being trusted by them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing others through effective coaching
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles this work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Develop others through effective coaching, mentoring, and training.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (14–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coaching and mentoring work through a trusting relationship with a particular person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising technologists and technicians in engineering tasks
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles technologists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2133/06
Source: “Supervise technologists and technicians in engineering tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (13–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising technical staff is day-to-day people management that software cannot take over.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in training events to enhance professional skills
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles training events and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Participate in training events to enhance professional skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking part in training events is about being present and building your own skills.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining and troubleshooting computers and related hardware to ensure optimal performance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: computers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2133/01
Source: “Maintain and troubleshoot computers and related hardware to ensure optimal performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (10–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fixing computers and hardware means physically opening, swapping and testing kit, which software cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing job performance to understand how information
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: job performance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2133/05
Source: “Observe job performance to understand how information is processed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Understanding how work really happens means watching people do it, which needs someone there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Enhancing team contribution through shadowing
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles team contribution and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Enhance team contribution through shadowing, collaborative work, and delivering training.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Shadowing and working alongside colleagues to lift the team is built on being there with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Installing and commissioning computer or telecoms hardware
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: computer, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2133/04
Source: “Install and commission computer or telecoms hardware.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Installing and commissioning physical hardware needs someone present with the equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Installing computer networks to meet clients' needs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: computer networks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2133/06
Source: “Install computer networks to meet clients' needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Installing a network means running cables and fitting equipment on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing installation teams during system setup and testing
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: installation teams during system setup, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2133/06
Source: “Direct installation teams during system setup and testing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Directing an installation team means being on site with the equipment and the people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £60,300a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 212,200in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: large-scale data sets in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: analysing large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights and examining existing IT systems to assess their efficiency. What it cannot do is be trusted in person, which is what leadership runs on: someone specific doing it and standing behind it. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

The exposed part of your job is the biggest part, and I am not going to dress that up: analysing large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights is work today's tools do quickly and cheaply, and that is not coming back.

So, given all that: 62% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 23% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 16% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 238 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

What you have that the software does not is demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change, plus the years of knowing when something looks wrong before you can say why. That is the raw material for everything below.

This week: one thing

Sit on the machine's side of the desk. Pick one real piece of large-scale data sets you would normally do yourself, let whatever software you already have take the first pass at it, and then go through what it produced and write down every single thing it got wrong. One evening this week. Do not fix anything yet. Just catch it.

What you end up holding: a written list of the machine’s mistakes, in your handwriting
How long it takes: an evening, or an hour if you pick one job rather than one client

If you can’t run software on your employer’s or your clients’ data: Do the same hunt on paper. Take one printed piece of large-scale data sets, work through it the way you always do, and mark every point where you made a call rather than followed a rule. Same evening, same list, nothing to log into and nobody to ask permission from. That list is the same artifact: it is the judgment written down.

Over the next 90 days

Change one sentence about what you do. Not on a CV. Out loud, to whoever pays you. From “my job is analysing large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights” to “I check what the software does and tell you what it means.” Your error list from this week is what makes that sentence true instead of a claim, so use it: show it once, to one person, inside the next ninety days. Same skills, priced as judgment rather than as typing.

Over the next 12 months

Walk toward the end of this job that answers for things, and get it recognised. Pick the one part of demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change you are already best at, and spend the year making it formal: a qualification, a named responsibility, a specialism people ask for by name. Price it honestly: that is evenings, it is months rather than weeks, and the seats are competitive because everyone in your position is looking at the same door. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to IT business analysts, architects and systems designers (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was information technology professionals n.e.c.: only about 8% of its durable work is work you already do, it is under the same pressure this job is and it pays 10.3% less. I am not going to pretend that is comfortable news: 62% of your own task list is already in the top exposure band. But the answer on this evidence is not a sideways jump into a job with the same problem. It is to walk toward the end of this one that answers for things. “develop new technology by applying theoretical expertise and innovation in computer applications” is the part that stays with a person, and spending a year getting formally recognised for it beats a standing start somewhere else.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Information technology professionals n.e.c.
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “communicate effectively with a range of stakeholders, both technical and non-technical, across all levels of influence…”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 8% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 8% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 62% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (63/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it. It is a pay cut, in those words: £54,107 against your £60,288, 10.3% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
IT technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “communicate effectively with a range of stakeholders, both technical and non-technical, across all levels of influence…”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 5% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 60% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (61/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it. It is a pay cut, in those words: £35,259 against your £60,288, 41.5% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Web design professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “supervise programmers in their development tasks”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 4% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 65% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (66/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it. It is a pay cut, in those words: £48,629 against your £60,288, 19.3% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 31,200 of those jobs against 212,200 of yours (ONS via Nomis), 15% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 62% of its task weight, across 238 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
“It’s too late for me to become something else”
You are not starting from zero, and the page shows why: demonstrating leadership and change management skills to manage technology-driven change is work the software cannot do and you already do it. The move above is a repricing of what you know, not a new career. Nobody who has just left college has that.
“I should learn to code”
Almost certainly not. The value in your job is moving toward checking, deciding and answering for the output, not toward writing the software. A weekend of Python will not change your position; the error list from this week will.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Computer Systems Analysts is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Computer and Information Research Scientists

In US official statistics this job is counted as Computer Systems Analysts and Computer and Information Research Scientists. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

The working behind that

The reporting and low-code Spaces are written for people without a technical background. Routing this group there is not a skill gain.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 62% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace IT business analysts, architects and systems designers?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 238 official task statements scored for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers (United Kingdom, SOC 2133), 62% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 62 out of 100 (range 57–69, band: high). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “IT business analysts, architects and systems designers” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Identify best practice in AI data systems, data structures, and data architecture” (93/100, very high); “Monitor networks to ensure availability to system users” (93/100, very high); “Analyse large-scale data sets to identify patterns and insights” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “IT business analysts, architects and systems designers” stay human?: About 16% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Direct installation teams during system setup and testing” (7/100, minimal); “Install computer networks to meet clients' needs” (9/100, minimal); “Install and commission computer or telecoms hardware” (10/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “IT business analysts, architects and systems designers” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 62% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 16% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for IT business analysts, architects and systems designers calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 238 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
57 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.