Futureproof
Menu

UK dataswitch to US

Leisure and theme park attendants

collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events, maintaining stocks of gaming equipment and materials to ensure customer satisfaction and announcing amusement park attractions to patrons. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI changes the edges of this job, not the middle: collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events is work software can't reach.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

What shifts is keeping records of ticket sales: the overhead at the edges, not the middle you trained for.

Your week, as this page understands it

Leisure and theme park attendants monitor the operation of amusement arcades, check tickets of entry to theatres and cinemas and show people to their seats, operate rides at funfairs and theme parks, entertain and look after guests at holiday camps and supervise museums and art galleries. The job title says “leisure” or “theme park attendants”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But leisure and theme park attendants is not one task. It is 47 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI
4%
changing shape
0%
staying human
96%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 9 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, across 47 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for leisure and theme park attendants is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

Shifting to AI

3 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

  • Keeping records of ticket sales

    This is reading one thing and writing another: records of ticket sales in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.

    importance 70 · 9267/02
    Source: “Keep records of ticket sales.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Logging ticket sales is routine record-keeping that booking software already does, apart from occasionally tallying paper stubs by hand.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

  • Maintaining accurate logs of participant attendance at events or meetings

    This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate logs of participant attendance in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.

    importance 50 · 9267/03
    Source: “Maintain accurate logs of participant attendance at events or meetings.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (62–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Attendance logging is simple record keeping, now largely done through apps, though someone sees who turns up.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Maintaining accurate records and using it systems to promote activities and manage customer bookings

    This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.

    importance 50 · 9267/02
    Source: “Maintain accurate records and use it systems to promote activities and manage customer bookings.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.

    The rating behind it: Booking systems and promotional copy are screen work that software already handles well, so this record-keeping and marketing duty is largely automatable.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

0 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Nothing in this job’s scored task list landed in this group. That is the measurement, not an editorial choice, and it is worth knowing either way.

Staying human

44 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

  • Collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events

    This work happens in the physical world: admission tickets, passes or facility memberships, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9267/02, 9267/03, 9267/05
    Source: “Collect admission tickets, passes, or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Taking tickets happens at the gate, with the customer in front of you.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Selling and checking tickets

    This work happens in the physical world: tickets, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/01, 9267/03, 9267/05
    Source: “Sell and check tickets.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (8–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Selling tickets at a counter and checking them at the door means being there in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Guiding visitors to rides, seats or attractions

    This work happens in the physical world: visitors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/01, 9267/03, 9267/05
    Source: “Guide visitors to rides, seats, or attractions.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Showing visitors where to go means being there with them in the park.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Fastening safety devices for patrons at rides and events

    This work happens in the physical world: safety devices, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/03, 9267/05
    Source: “Fasten safety devices for patrons at rides and events.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Checking and fastening a rider's harness is done by hand at the ride.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Carrying out minor repairs to arcade or ride machinery

    This work happens in the physical world: minor repairs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/01, 9267/05
    Source: “Carry out minor repairs to arcade or ride machinery.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Repairing arcade or ride machinery means tools in hand at the machine itself.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Operating mechanical riding devices in amusement parks

    This work happens in the physical world: mechanical riding devices, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/01, 9267/05
    Source: “Operate mechanical riding devices in amusement parks, funfairs, or recreation areas.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Running a ride means standing at the controls with riders in front of you.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Providing visitors with information about available facilities

    This work happens in the physical world: visitors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/03, 9267/05
    Source: “Provide visitors with information about available facilities.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Facility information is easy to look up, though visitors often ask the person in front of them.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 37 tasks

  • Providing excellent customer service, responding to inquiries and addressing any concerns or issues

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: excellent customer service, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/02
    Source: “Provide excellent customer service, responding to inquiries and addressing any concerns or issues.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Routine enquiries answer well automatically, though an unhappy customer at reception usually wants a person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Resolving customer complaints related to show experiences

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customer complaints, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/02
    Source: “Resolve customer complaints related to show experiences.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Complaint replies and goodwill offers draft well, but most show complaints are settled on the spot in the foyer.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Giving directions to guests

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: directions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/04
    Source: “Give directions to guests.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Directions can be looked up or shown on a screen, but visitors usually ask the person at the desk.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Maintaining stocks of gaming equipment and materials to ensure customer satisfaction

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: stocks of gaming equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/01
    Source: “Maintain stocks of gaming equipment and materials to ensure customer satisfaction.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Ordering and stock counts are easy to automate, but putting equipment back out on the floor is physical work.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Checking tickets and other relevant documents for an event

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: tickets, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/02
    Source: “Check tickets and other relevant documents for an event.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Judging whether a ticket is genuine is simple for software, but someone has to be on the gate to look at it.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Inspecting tickets and passes for validity

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: tickets, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/02
    Source: “Inspect tickets and passes for validity.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Deciding if a ticket is valid is simple for software, but someone still has to be at the entrance checking them.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Maintaining knowledge of first-aid procedures

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: knowledge of first-aid procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/03, 9267/05
    Source: “Maintain knowledge of first-aid procedures.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: First-aid guidance is widely published, though the point of knowing it is to use your hands when someone is hurt.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

  • Providing relevant information to visitors

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: relevant information, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/04
    Source: “Provide relevant information to visitors.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: The information itself is easy to produce, but attendants deliver it standing among the visitors.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Responding to questions from group members

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: questions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/04
    Source: “Respond to questions from group members.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Answers to visitor questions are well documented, but they are given face to face while the group is with you.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Showing audiovisual presentations and explaining establishment processes and operations

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: audiovisual presentations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/04
    Source: “Show audiovisual presentations and explain establishment processes and operations.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: The presentation and script are easy to produce, but showing it and explaining operations happens in front of visitors.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Announcing amusement park attractions to patrons

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: amusement park attractions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/05
    Source: “Announce amusement park attractions to patrons.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: The announcement is easy to write or record, but attendants make it on the spot at the ride.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Greeting and assisting visitors with information about exhibits

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: visitors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/04
    Source: “Greet and assist visitors with information about exhibits.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Exhibit information can be written or shown on screen, but greeting and helping visitors happens in the room.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Monitoring and enforcing compliance with safety rules and regulations in a workplace

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: compliance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/03
    Source: “Monitor and enforce compliance with safety rules and regulations in a workplace.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Watching riders and stepping in when someone breaks a safety rule means being there in person, on the spot.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Cleaning gaming and ride equipment to ensure safety and functionality

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: ride equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/01
    Source: “Clean gaming and ride equipment to ensure safety and functionality.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Cleaning ride and gaming equipment is hands-on work that has to happen at the machine.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Checking machinery for wear and damage

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: machinery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/01, 9267/05
    Source: “Check machinery for wear and damage.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Spotting wear and damage means looking at, listening to and touching the machinery in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Running games at funfair stalls

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: games, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/01, 9267/05
    Source: “Run games at funfair stalls.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Running a stall game involves handling equipment and players face to face.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Showing people to their seats

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: people, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 90 · 9267/02
    Source: “Show people to their seats.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Walking guests to their seats needs a person in the room.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Greeting guests attending entertainment events

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: guests attending entertainment events, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/02
    Source: “Greet guests attending entertainment events.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Greeting guests as they arrive is a person standing at the door.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Serving customers in the cinema or theatre's cafe

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/02
    Source: “Serve customers in the cinema or theatre's cafe, bar, or box office.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Serving at a bar, kiosk or box office means being behind the counter.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Ushering attendees to their seats for various services

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: attendees, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 80 · 9267/02
    Source: “Usher attendees to their seats for various services.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Showing people to their seats means walking them there.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Distributing programmes to patrons

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: programmes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/02
    Source: “Distribute programmes to patrons.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Handing out programmes happens face to face in the venue.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Guiding patrons to exits or providing other instructions or assistance in case of emergency

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: patrons, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/02
    Source: “Guide patrons to exits or provide other instructions or assistance in case of emergency.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Guiding people to exits in an emergency means being in the building with them.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Operating refreshment stands during interval

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: refreshment stands during interval, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/02
    Source: “Operate refreshment stands during interval.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Running a refreshment stand at the interval is hands-on counter service.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Selling cinema and theatre programmes to guests

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: cinema, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/02
    Source: “Sell cinema and theatre programmes to guests.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Selling programmes to guests happens in person in the venue.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Handling wheelchairs for customers requiring assistance

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: wheelchairs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/02
    Source: “Handle wheelchairs for customers requiring assistance.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Pushing and handling wheelchairs is physical help given in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Lighting the way with torches

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: the way, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/02
    Source: “Light the way with torches for patrons, if necessary.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Lighting someone to their seat with a torch can only be done in the auditorium.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 0/4.

  • Maintaining cleanliness and organization in the workplace

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: cleanliness, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/02
    Source: “Maintain cleanliness and organization in the workplace, including cleaning, disinfection, and waste disposal.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Cleaning, disinfecting and taking out waste has to be done in the building.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Refusing entry to undesirable persons or persons without tickets or passes

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: entry, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/02
    Source: “Refuse entry to undesirable persons or persons without tickets or passes.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Turning someone away at the door means standing at the door.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Resolving seating disputes among customers

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: disputes among customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/02
    Source: “Resolve seating disputes among customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Sorting out who sits where means being in the auditorium with the people disagreeing.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Cleaning changing rooms in facilities

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: rooms, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/02
    Source: “Clean changing rooms in facilities.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Cleaning changing rooms is hands-on work in the room itself.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

  • Monitoring and enforcing safety rules in a facility

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: safety rules, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/02
    Source: “Monitor and enforce safety rules in a facility.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Enforcing safety rules means patrolling the site and speaking to people on the spot.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Searching for lost items

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: lost items, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/02
    Source: “Search for lost items.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Looking for a lost item means physically searching the place it was lost.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Selling refreshments to customers

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: refreshments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/03
    Source: “Sell refreshments to customers.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Selling refreshments happens over a counter with the customer there.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Leading tours and answering visitors' questions about the exhibits

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: tours, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 70 · 9267/04
    Source: “Lead tours and answer visitors' questions about the exhibits.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Leading a tour means walking a group around the building in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

  • Distributing brochures at tour sites

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: brochures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/04
    Source: “Distribute brochures at tour sites.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.

    The rating behind it: Handing brochures to visitors at a site happens in person.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Leading individuals or groups on tours of site locations

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: individuals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 50 · 9267/04
    Source: “Lead individuals or groups on tours of site locations.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Taking groups round a site means walking it with them.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

  • Aiding customers in mounting or dismounting animals

    staying human

    This work happens in the physical world: customers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.

    importance 60 · 9267/05
    Source: “Aid customers in mounting or dismounting animals.” (UK task statement)
    How this row was scored

    Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.

    Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.

    The rating behind it: Helping someone on or off an animal is hands-on physical help.

    The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay
£22,300a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this

Source: ashe-t14

Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)

Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.

People doing this job
45,900in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: records of ticket sales in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: keeping records of ticket sales and maintaining accurate logs of participant attendance at events or meetings. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where admission tickets, passes or facility memberships get done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 4% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 0% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 96% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 47 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Keeping records of ticket sales is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to records of ticket sales, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding
a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes
ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether admission tickets, passes or facility memberships are in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to leisure and theme park attendants (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was other elementary services occupations n.e.c.: only about 16% of its durable work is work you already do. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 9/100 here, with only 4% of the task list in the top band, and “operate mechanical riding devices in amusement parks, funfairs, or recreation areas” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

  • Other elementary services occupations n.e.c.

    Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “collect admission tickets, passes, or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 16% of the work in that job the software is not taking.

    Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 16% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.

    Look at that job’s page anyway →

  • Leisure and travel service occupations n.e.c.

    Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “lead individuals or groups on tours of site locations”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 14% of the work in that job the software is not taking.

    Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 14% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.

    Look at that job’s page anyway →

  • Waiters and waitresses

    Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “show people to their seats”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 11% of the work in that job the software is not taking.

    Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 11% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on.

    Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

  • The headline number you read somewhere

    The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 4% of its task weight, across 47 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.

  • The headlines about your trade disappearing

    They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like collecting admission tickets, passes or facility memberships from patrons at entertainment events arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.

  • Retraining out of a job that is holding up

    On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.

  • The “obvious” next job everyone suggests

    I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

If you run a team doing this job

If you run a team doing this job, the conversation you owe them is the one on this page, and sooner than feels comfortable. Show them the ledger rather than a reassurance: the rows moving toward the software are keeping records of ticket sales, and the rows that are not are where you want your people visible. Ask each of them to do the this-week move and bring the list to your next one-to-one. It turns a rumour into a piece of work, and it tells you which parts of your team's week are actually at stake. And say the thing out loud that a team lead usually leaves unsaid: a shrinking team is your exposure too, so do the move yourself as well.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Motion Picture Projectionists is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Motion Picture Projectionists, Ushers, Lobby Attendants, and Ticket Takers, Amusement and Recreation Attendants, Locker Room, Coatroom, and Dressing Room Attendants and Parking Attendants. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

Why there is no community here

Collab365, who build this site, run paid Spaces for a small number of subjects, and none of them is built for this job. We are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

So the free services listed on this page are the whole answer, and it is the same answer we would give a friend.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for leisure / theme park attendants launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for leisure / theme park attendants yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for leisure / theme park attendants existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for leisure / theme park attendants launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Leisure and theme park attendants?
Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 47 official task statements scored for Leisure and theme park attendants (United Kingdom, SOC 9267), 4% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 9 out of 100 (range 6–14, band: minimal). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Leisure and theme park attendants” can AI already do?
The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Keep records of ticket sales” (75/100, high); “Maintain accurate logs of participant attendance at events or meetings” (69/100, high); “Maintain accurate records and use it systems to promote activities and manage customer bookings” (64/100, high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Leisure and theme park attendants” stay human?
About 96% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Aid customers in mounting or dismounting animals” (0/100, minimal); “Lead individuals or groups on tours of site locations” (0/100, minimal); “Distribute brochures at tour sites” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Leisure and theme park attendants” do about AI?
Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 4% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 96% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Leisure and theme park attendants calculated?
Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 47 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

  • Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
  • This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
  • The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
  • 13 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
  • Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.
Task statements
gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights
gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores
Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment
ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a jobDownload this releaseLook up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published . Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.