Will AI replace Precision instrument makers and repairers?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 128 official task statements scored for Precision instrument makers and repairers (United Kingdom, SOC 5224), 19% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 23 out of 100 (range 20–29, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Precision instrument makers and repairers” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Prepare written documentation of electromechanical test results” (93/100, very high); “Record test data in technical reports for equipment performance analysis” (93/100, very high); “Update equipment lists accurately and inform relevant parties of changes” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Precision instrument makers and repairers” stay human?

About 73% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Separate lenses in containers for further processing or storage” (0/100, minimal); “Repair faulty components using hand tools and soldering irons” (0/100, minimal); “Immerse spectacle frames in solutions to harden, soften, or dye frames” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Precision instrument makers and repairers” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 19% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 73% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Precision instrument makers and repairers calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 128 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Precision instrument makers and repairers

calibrating devices by comparing measurements of environmental conditions to known standards, specifying replacement components for quartz and mechanical watches and designing measurement processes and selecting suitable tools. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI is already taking a real slice of the routine work here: preparing written documentation of electromechanical test results. That is a slice of tasks, not of you.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 19%
changing shape: 9%
staying human: 73%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 23 out of 100 (20–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 128 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for precision instrument makers and repairers is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

That slice is not coming back; the core of the job, inspecting mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments, stays yours. New tools, same person answering for it.

Your week, as this page understands it

Precision instrument makers and repairers make, calibrate, test and repair precision and optical instruments such as barometers, compasses, cameras, calibrators, watches, clocks and chronometers. The job title says “precision instrument makers” or “repairers”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: inspecting mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But precision instrument makers and repairers is not one task. It is 128 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is inspecting mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 19%
changing shape: 9%
staying human: 73%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-05. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
61 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

25 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Applying quality control principles
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality control principles in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 5224/04
Source: “Apply quality control principles to identify, amend, and record errors and omissions in orders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking orders for errors and recording the corrections is routine checking that software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and interpreting test data to ensure instrument accuracy
This is reading one thing and writing another: test data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 5224/01
Source: “Analyse and interpret test data to ensure instrument accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out whether readings show an instrument is within tolerance is calculation on data already in digital form.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Retrieving, analysing and interpreting measurement data to validate results
This is reading one thing and writing another: measurement data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 5224/01
Source: “Retrieve, analyse, and interpret measurement data to validate results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once readings are captured they are just numbers, and checking them against expected results is work software does quickly and reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Complying with statutory regulations, standards and codes of conduct for measurement tasks
This is reading one thing and writing another: statutory regulations, standards and codes of conduct in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 5224/01
Source: “Comply with statutory regulations, standards, and codes of conduct for measurement tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measurement standards and regulations are published in detail, so checking work against them is document-based.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

12 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Communicating measurement information effectively and accurately to meet customer requirements
The software now makes the first pass at measurement information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 5224/01
Source: “Communicate measurement information effectively and accurately to meet customer requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning measurement results into a clear report for a customer is writing work from data already captured.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Specifying replacement components for quartz and mechanical watches
The software now makes the first pass at replacement components, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Specify replacement components for quartz and mechanical watches.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Matching a movement to the right replacement parts is catalogue lookup that software does quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reading engineering drawings, schematics, diagrams or technical orders to determine methods and sequences of assembly
The software now makes the first pass at drawings, schematics, diagrams or technical orders, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 5224/01
Source: “Read engineering drawings, schematics, diagrams, or technical orders to determine methods and sequences of assembly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out an assembly sequence from drawings is planning done away from the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

91 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Inspecting mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments
This work happens in the physical world: mounted, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/02, 5224/04
Source: “Inspect mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Instruments give the numbers, but a person mounts and handles each lens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Dismantling and reassembling machines or equipment using hand tools
This work happens in the physical world: machines, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/01, 5224/02
Source: “Dismantle and reassemble machines or equipment using hand tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Stripping and rebuilding machines is hands-on work with tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Calibrating devices by comparing measurements of environmental conditions to known standards
This work happens in the physical world: devices, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 5224/01
Source: “Calibrate devices by comparing measurements of environmental conditions to known standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The comparison method is documented, but taking the readings and trimming the device is done by hand at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 118 tasks

Preparing written documentation of electromechanical test results
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: written documentation of electromechanical test results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 5224/01
Source: “Prepare written documentation of electromechanical test results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing test results up into proper documentation is desk work once the readings exist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording test data in technical reports for equipment performance analysis
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: test data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 5224/02
Source: “Record test data in technical reports for equipment performance analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning test readings into a technical report is structured writing and number work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating equipment lists accurately and informing relevant parties of changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: equipment lists in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Update equipment lists accurately and inform relevant parties of changes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping equipment lists current and notifying people is routine record-keeping software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering or requisitioning materials or supplies for specific projects or tasks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Order or requisition materials or supplies for specific projects or tasks.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Raising requisitions for materials is routine purchasing paperwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering supplies for instruments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: supplies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Order supplies for instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ordering parts from catalogues and stock records is routine screen work that software already does at least as well as a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reading and interpreting operating manuals for equipment
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: manuals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Read and interpret operating manuals for equipment use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading a manual and pulling out what matters is exactly what language software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Responding to enquiries about new equipment
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: enquiries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Respond to enquiries about new equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (72–86 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Answering questions about equipment draws on manuals and specifications software reads well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records of work
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records of work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 5224/02
Source: “Maintain accurate records of work performed, including maintenance schedules, repairs, and parts used.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Once the technician says what was done, writing it up and filing it accurately is straightforward work for software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing blueprints and work orders to identify specific tasks required for project completion
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: blueprints in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Review blueprints and work orders to identify specific tasks required for project completion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading drawings and work orders to list what needs doing is document interpretation software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting fabrication techniques on reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: fabrication techniques in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Document fabrication techniques on reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up how something was made is straightforward technical documentation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting components and estimated cost for watch repairs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: components in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Document components and estimated cost for watch repairs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Listing the parts needed and pricing them is straightforward costing from catalogues and rate cards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting work undertaken on watches
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: work undertaken in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Document work undertaken on watches.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up what was done to a watch is routine record-keeping.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining records of completed work to track repairs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of completed work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Maintain records of completed work to track repairs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping a repair history is standard record-keeping that job systems handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording details of repairs made and parts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: details of repairs made in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Record details of repairs made and parts used.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Logging which parts went in and what was repaired is structured record keeping that software handles well from the technician's notes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting clinical prescriptions and spectacle orders to accurately select lens and frame materials for manufacturing
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: clinical prescriptions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Interpret clinical prescriptions and spectacle orders to accurately select lens and frame materials for manufacturing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Choosing lens and frame materials follows published rules from the prescription, which software handles well, with a registered dispenser responsible for the order.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising Rental Desk colleagues and clients on equipment compatibility and usage
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: rental desk colleagues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Advise Rental Desk colleagues and clients on equipment compatibility and usage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compatibility and usage advice comes from documented specifications, which tools look up and explain well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning and allocating resources to meet specification timescales
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: resources in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Plan and allocate resources to meet specification timescales, resolving any resource availability issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Resource planning against timescales is scheduling work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting specifications for client shooting packages and recommending changes to pre-empt complications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Interpret specifications for client shooting packages and recommend changes to pre-empt complications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading a shooting specification and spotting gaps is document work tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering quotes for watch repair services
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quotes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Offer quotes for watch repair services.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Quoting for a repair follows standard prices for standard jobs, so most quotes can be generated automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording serial and model numbers of repaired items
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: serial in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Record serial and model numbers of repaired items.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording serial and model numbers is simple data entry, though someone has to read them off the item.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting optical prescriptions written by optometrists or ophthalmologists
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: optical prescriptions written in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Interpret optical prescriptions written by optometrists or ophthalmologists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Prescription notation is standardised and easy to convert, but dispensing decisions rest with a registered professional.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Ordering specific replacement parts for equipment maintenance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific replacement parts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 5224/01
Source: “Order specific replacement parts for equipment maintenance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Identifying and ordering the right replacement part is catalogue and paperwork work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reading and interpreting engineering drawings
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Read and interpret engineering drawings, specifications, and maintenance manuals to perform accurate and efficient repairs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading engineering drawings and manuals is document work with well-established conventions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating timepiece values
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at timepiece values, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Evaluate timepiece values.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Auction results and price guides are widely published, though the value still depends on inspecting the actual piece.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Drawing plans for developing jigs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at plans, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 5224/01
Source: “Draw plans for developing jigs, fixtures, instruments, or other devices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Drawing up jigs and fixtures gets real help from design software, though the detail needs an engineer's review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Continuouslying update the order handler and relevant colleagues on client shooting package progress
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at update the order handler, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Continuously update the order handler and relevant colleagues on client shooting package progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress updates are drawn from the order system, which software can compile and send automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing time and resources efficiently to meet production deadlines and deliver completed orders
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at time, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 5224/04
Source: “Manage time and resources efficiently to meet production deadlines and deliver completed orders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning work through a workshop to hit deadlines is scheduling that software does well from job data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting diagrams to determine fabrication methods
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at diagrams, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Interpret diagrams to determine fabrication methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading a drawing to work out how to make something is well-documented reasoning, though experience decides the practical route.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with clients to understand their needs and requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Engage with clients to understand their needs and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients explain what they actually need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Practising continuous self-learning to keep up to date with industry trends and developments to enhance relevant skills and take responsibility for own professional development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at continuous, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Practise continuous self-learning to keep up to date with industry trends and developments to enhance relevant skills and take responsibility for own professional development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Keeping your own skills current is something only the individual can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing measurement processes and selecting suitable tools
staying human
The ratings behind this row put measurement processes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 5224/01
Source: “Design measurement processes and select suitable tools, equipment, and software programs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measurement methods are well documented, but choosing the right approach for an awkward part needs someone who knows the kit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring stock levels, rotate stock and maintaining accurate stock control records
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: stock levels, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/04
Source: “Monitor stock levels, rotate stock, and maintain accurate stock control records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The records are easy for software, but rotating stock means moving it yourself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with colleagues and stakeholders to identify measurement needs and make informed decisions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 5224/01
Source: “Collaborate with colleagues and stakeholders to identify measurement needs and make informed decisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Agreeing what to measure happens through discussion with colleagues who hold the business context.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Recommending design changes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put design changes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Recommend design changes for microfilming, film-developing, or photographic equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Suggesting design improvements needs knowledge of how these particular machines fail in service.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Gathering information from customers about a timepiece's problems and its service history
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: information, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Gather information from customers about a timepiece's problems and its service history.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Intake questions could be a form, but customers usually hand the watch over in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing with customers the repairs
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles customers the repairs and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Discuss with customers the repairs needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Customers need to trust the person telling them what their car needs, though the estimate itself can be prepared.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring the accuracy and quality of measurement results by following specified procedures and methodologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the accuracy, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/01
Source: “Ensure the accuracy and quality of measurement results by following specified procedures and methodologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The procedures and checks are documented and software can police them, but the measuring they govern still happens at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing and maintaining metering and measurement plans using appropriate tools and technologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: measurement plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/01
Source: “Implement and maintain metering and measurement plans using appropriate tools and technologies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Metering plans are documented, yet fitting and looking after meters means being at the site with the kit.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring complete compatibility between all camera accessories
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: complete compatibility, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/02
Source: “Ensure complete compatibility between all camera accessories, lenses, and peripherals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Compatibility can be checked against documentation, but the certain test is fitting the pieces together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with internal and external customers to understand their needs
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles internal and external customers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Communicate with internal and external customers to understand their needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding what a customer actually needs comes from talking with them, though notes and summaries can be produced.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting processed film or laboratory reports to diagnose malfunction
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: processed film, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/02
Source: “Inspect processed film or laboratory reports to diagnose malfunction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Laboratory reports can be read by software, but judging processed film usually means holding it up and looking.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Working safely at all times by adhering to relevant legislation and regulations to ensure the safety of self
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: all times, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Work safely at all times by adhering to relevant legislation and regulations to ensure the safety of self and others.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (16–24 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The legislation is published and easy to look up, but working safely through the day is down to the person at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to health and safety requirements in the workplace
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/04
Source: “Adhere to health and safety requirements in the workplace.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (16–24 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Safety rules are written down and easy to look up, but following them hour by hour is something only the person there can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Attending workshops or other training sessions to learn about new tools or methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workshops, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/01
Source: “Attend workshops or other training sessions to learn about new tools or methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (5–29 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Attending a session to learn something is a person spending their own time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in training events to enhance professional skills
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles training events and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 5224/03
Source: “Participate in training events to enhance professional skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Taking part in training events is about being present and building your own skills.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with a team to resolve issues
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a team and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 5224/04
Source: “Collaborate with a team to resolve issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Software can suggest fixes, but working a problem through with colleagues depends on knowing the workshop and the people in it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inventing innovative calibration methods tailored to specific scientific measurement needs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: innovative calibration methods, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/01
Source: “Invent innovative calibration methods tailored to specific scientific measurement needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Genuinely new calibration methods come from deep specialist experience and have to be tried out on real equipment before anyone trusts them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying and resolving problems within the manufacturing process using effective problem-solving techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: problems within the manufacturing process, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/04
Source: “Identify and resolve problems within the manufacturing process using effective problem-solving techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Solving manufacturing problems means working on the line where they happen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting cameras and equipment to diagnose malfunction
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cameras, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/02
Source: “Inspect cameras and equipment to diagnose malfunction, using work aids and specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fault symptoms are well documented, but finding what is wrong with a camera means having it in your hands.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting lens blanks to detect flaws
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lens blanks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/04
Source: “Inspect lens blanks to detect flaws, verify surface smoothness, and ensure appropriate coating thickness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Flaw detection software helps, though the blanks still have to be handled and checked.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making changes and substitutions according to crew requests and organisational procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: changes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 5224/02
Source: “Make changes and substitutions according to crew requests and organisational procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (0–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Swapping and substituting kit to suit a request means physically changing what is set up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining and calibrating measurement tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: measurement tools, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/01
Source: “Maintain and calibrate measurement tools, equipment, and instrumentation as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Calibration procedures are written down, but adjusting the instrument against a standard means handling the equipment itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the image quality of printed materials
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the image quality of printed materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/02
Source: “Assess the image quality of printed materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Some checks can be automated, but judging a printed sheet means holding it under the light.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Replacing or substituting equipment not fit for purpose
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment not fit, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Replace or substitute equipment not fit for purpose as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Choosing a substitute can be looked up, but swapping equipment out means physically doing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing timepiece accuracy and performance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: timepiece accuracy, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Test timepiece accuracy and performance, using meters and other electronic instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Timing tests need the watch on the machine, though the readings themselves are simple to interpret.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining and calibrating optical equipment and tools according to supplier guidelines and industry standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: optical equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Maintain and calibrate optical equipment and tools according to supplier guidelines and industry standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Supplier guidance sets out the steps, but the calibration itself is done with hands on the optical equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out calibration tests to determine performance or reliability
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: calibration tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/01
Source: “Carry out calibration tests to determine performance or reliability of mechanical, structural, or electromechanical equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Calibration testing means putting the instrument on the bench and running real measurements against a standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting equipment to detect surface defects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/01
Source: “Inspect equipment to detect surface defects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spotting surface defects on equipment is done by looking at and touching it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attending conferences, seminars and training sessions to stay informed about field developments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conferences, seminars and training sessions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/01
Source: “Attend conferences, seminars, and training sessions to stay informed about field developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Attending conferences and training is about being there and meeting people in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying accuracy of light meters
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: accuracy of light meters, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/02
Source: “Verify accuracy of light meters, shutter diaphragm operation, and lens carriers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking a shutter and light meter against a standard means testing the actual camera.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing the condition of quartz and mechanical watches and their components using test equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the condition of quartz, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Assess the condition of quartz and mechanical watches and their components using test equipment, visual assessment and observation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Judging a watch’s condition means opening it and looking at the parts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying faults in watch movements and deciding on intervention levels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: faults, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Identify faults in watch movements and decide on intervention levels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Finding what is wrong inside a movement means examining the actual parts under magnification.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting components of timepieces for defects using magnifying glasses or microscopes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: components of timepieces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Inspect components of timepieces for defects using magnifying glasses or microscopes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Spotting defects in tiny components means having them under a microscope in front of you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Shaping lenses appropriately so that they can be fitted into frames
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/04
Source: “Shape lenses appropriately so that they can be fitted into frames.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Shaping a lens to fit a frame is machine work at the bench, even though the shape needed is set by the prescription.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Measuring workpieces and laying out work
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: workpieces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/02
Source: “Measure workpieces and lay out work, using precision measuring devices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Marking out means putting instruments and scribed lines on the actual workpiece, even though the measurements themselves come off a drawing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supporting colleagues with their work
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: colleagues, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Support colleagues with their work as needed, ensuring no detriment to own deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 1 out of 100 (0–5 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Helping colleagues out is a person stepping in alongside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Inspecting assembled or finished products to ensure conformance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: assembled, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/01
Source: “Inspect assembled or finished products to ensure conformance to specifications, using precision measuring instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Measuring finished products with precision instruments requires handling them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Manufacturing fixtures using metalworking machines for precision instruments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fixtures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/01
Source: “Manufacture fixtures using metalworking machines for precision instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making a fixture on a lathe or mill is hands-on machining.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assembling photographic equipment, including cameras and frames, using tools and diagrams
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: photographic equipment, including cameras and frames, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/02
Source: “Assemble photographic equipment, including cameras and frames, using tools and diagrams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Assembling cameras and frames is fine handwork with tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting positions and controls of cameras
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: positions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/02
Source: “Adjust positions and controls of cameras, printers, and related equipment to change focus, exposure, and lighting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Adjusting the controls on the equipment itself requires hands on the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning or maintaining photoprocessing or darkroom equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: darkroom equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/02
Source: “Clean or maintain photoprocessing or darkroom equipment, using ultrasonic equipment or cleaning and rinsing solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning darkroom and processing equipment is physical work at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Serving clients by repairing and maintaining photographic equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/02
Source: “Serve clients by repairing and maintaining photographic equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Repairing a customer’s camera is bench work with tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Checking lenses on delivery to ensure that they meet the required specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/02
Source: “Check lenses on delivery to ensure that they meet the required specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking a lens against its specification means physically handling and testing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing basic first-line maintenance and repairs on equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: basic first-line maintenance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/02
Source: “Perform basic first-line maintenance and repairs on equipment, including tightening or replacing screws on tripods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Tightening and replacing screws on equipment is hands-on maintenance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing and evaluating equipment prior to despatch and conducting full tests for intended configuration
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment prior, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/02
Source: “Review and evaluate equipment prior to despatch and conduct full tests for intended configuration.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Testing kit before it goes out means switching it on and checking it by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting photographers by managing equipment and facilitating logistics during photo shoots
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: photographers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Assist photographers by managing equipment and facilitating logistics during photo shoots.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Handling kit on a shoot means being there carrying and setting it up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Fitting electrical assemblies in aircraft camera housings following blueprints using hand tools and soldering equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrical assemblies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Fit electrical assemblies in aircraft camera housings following blueprints using hand tools and soldering equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fitting and soldering assemblies into camera housings is precise handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Manufacturing defective electronic components according to specifications using tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: defective electronic components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Manufacture defective electronic components according to specifications using tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making replacement electronic parts is machine and bench work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Manufacturing defective mechanical components according to specifications using tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: defective mechanical components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Manufacture defective mechanical components according to specifications using tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making replacement mechanical parts is machining done by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Returning rental/loan equipment to original/suitable specification
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rental/loan equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/02
Source: “Return rental/loan equipment to original/suitable specification after use.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Restoring returned kit to its proper state is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Giving technical directions to personnel during filming
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: technical directions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Give technical directions to personnel during filming.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing crew during filming means being on set as it happens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing physical assistance or advice during tight deadlines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: physical assistance, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 5224/02
Source: “Provide physical assistance or advice during tight deadlines, two-person tasks, or when colleagues lack knowledge.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Lending a hand to colleagues on a two-person job is physical help.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Handing equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 5224/02
Source: “Hand equipment over to clients, couriers, and drivers in line with organisational logistics procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Handing equipment over to a courier or client happens in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting timing regulators using truing callipers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: regulators, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/03
Source: “Adjust timing regulators using truing callipers, watch-rate recorders, and tweezers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Adjusting a timing regulator is fine handwork under magnification.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Cleaning timepiece parts using solutions and ultrasonic or mechanical watch-cleaning machines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: timepiece parts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Clean timepiece parts using solutions and ultrasonic or mechanical watch-cleaning machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning watch parts is hands-on work with solutions and machines.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Oiling moving parts of timepieces
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: parts of timepieces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Oil moving parts of timepieces.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Oiling a movement is delicate hand work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Performing regular adjustment and maintenance on timepieces
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: regular adjustment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Perform regular adjustment and maintenance on timepieces, watch cases, and watch straps.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Adjusting and servicing watches, cases and straps is bench work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Replacing broken, damaged or worn parts on timepieces using lathes, drill presses and hand tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: broken, damaged or worn parts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Replace broken, damaged, or worn parts on timepieces using lathes, drill presses, and hand tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Replacing worn parts on a lathe or drill press is hands-on machining.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Restoring clocks to meet specific employer or customer expectations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clocks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Restore clocks to meet specific employer or customer expectations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Restoring a clock is skilled handwork on the movement and case.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Servicing and lubricating quartz watch movements to meet manufacturer's specifications
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: quartz watch movements, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Service and lubricate quartz watch movements to meet manufacturer's specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Servicing and lubricating a movement is fine handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Taking apart and inspecting timepieces to identify faults
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: apart, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/03
Source: “Take apart and inspect timepieces to identify faults.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Stripping a watch down to find faults is handwork under magnification.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Demagnetizing mechanisms using demagnetizing machines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: mechanisms, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Demagnetize mechanisms using demagnetizing machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Demagnetising a movement means putting it on the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Opening watch cases and removing the movements for repair or inspection
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: watch cases, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Open watch cases and remove the movements for repair or inspection.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Opening a case and lifting out the movement is delicate handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing and reassembling watch components
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: watch components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Prepare and reassemble watch components such as gaskets, glasses, and pushers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fitting gaskets, glasses and pushers back together is precise handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Replacing watch straps and batteries
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: watch straps, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Replace watch straps and batteries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Changing a strap or a battery is a small hands-on job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing and replacing batteries and other electronic components
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: batteries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/03
Source: “Test and replace batteries and other electronic components.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Opening a case to swap a battery or component is hands-on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Fabricating new metal parts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: new metal parts, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Fabricate new metal parts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making metal parts is done at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Manufacturing precision tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: precision tools, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Manufacture precision tools using lathes, presses, and cutting machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making precision tools on lathes and presses is machining work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Refinishing polished and grained surfaces of watch cases and bracelets
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: polished, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/03
Source: “Refinish polished and grained surfaces of watch cases and bracelets.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Refinishing a case or bracelet is skilled hand polishing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Cleaning and oiling machines to maintain operational efficiency
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: machines, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Clean and oil machines to maintain operational efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning and oiling machines is physical maintenance work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Ensuring the workshop is kept tidy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the workshop is kept tidy, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Ensure the workshop is kept tidy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Tidying a workshop is physical work in the workshop.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 0/4.
Maintaining and repairing hand tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hand tools, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Maintain and repair hand tools, power tools and associated equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Maintaining and repairing tools is physical work on the tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining tools in an appropriate condition to undertake servicing procedures for watchmaking
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tools, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Maintain tools in an appropriate condition to undertake servicing procedures for watchmaking.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping tools sharp and true is hands-on bench work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Returning timepieces to customers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: timepieces, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/03
Source: “Return timepieces to customers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Handing a watch back to its owner means someone being there to do it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Etching designs onto a watch face
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: designs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 5224/03
Source: “Etch designs onto a watch face.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Etching a design onto a dial is fine handwork on the piece itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Cleaning finished lenses and spectacles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: finished lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 5224/04
Source: “Clean finished lenses and spectacles, using cloths and solvents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cleaning lenses with cloths and solvents is manual.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Fitting spectacles or contacting lenses
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: spectacles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 5224/04
Source: “Fit spectacles or contact lenses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Fitting lenses means adjusting them on a real person's face and eyes, and only a registered optician may fit contact lenses.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Mounting and securing lens blanks or optical lenses in holding tools or chucks of cutting
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lens blanks, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/04
Source: “Mount and secure lens blanks or optical lenses in holding tools or chucks of cutting, polishing, grinding, or coating machines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Mounting blanks into machine chucks is manual setup.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Securing and aligning finished lenses in frames or optical assemblies using precision hand tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: finished lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 5224/04
Source: “Secure and align finished lenses in frames or optical assemblies using precision hand tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fitting lenses into frames is precise handwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Adjusting tools to achieve specified cuts
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tools, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Adjust tools to achieve specified cuts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting a tool to cut correctly is done at the machine by feel.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Controlling equipment that coats lenses to alter their reflective qualities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Control equipment that coats lenses to alter their reflective qualities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Running the coating equipment means loading lenses and working the machine on the shop floor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Repairing and adjusting optical appliances for accurate fitting
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: optical appliances, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Repair and adjust optical appliances for accurate fitting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Adjusting glasses or instruments to fit is hands-on work with the appliance and often the wearer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Setting dials and starting machines to polish lenses
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: dials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 5224/04
Source: “Set dials and start machines to polish lenses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Setting dials and starting polishing machines happens at the machine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Laying out lenses and trace their outlines on glass using templates
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/04
Source: “Lay out lenses and trace their outlines on glass using templates.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Laying out and tracing lenses on glass is bench work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Removing lenses from moulds
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 5224/04
Source: “Remove lenses from moulds.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Taking lenses out of moulds is manual.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Immersing spectacle frames in solutions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: spectacle frames, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/04
Source: “Immerse spectacle frames in solutions to harden, soften, or dye frames.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Dipping frames in solutions is done at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Repairing faulty components using hand tools and soldering irons
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: faulty components, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 5224/04
Source: “Repair faulty components using hand tools and soldering irons.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Soldering and hand-tool repairs need hands on the part.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Separating lenses in containers for further processing or storage
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lenses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 5224/04
Source: “Separate lenses in containers for further processing or storage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Sorting lenses into containers is physical handling.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 1/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £40,100a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 15,800in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: written documentation of electromechanical test results in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: preparing written documentation of electromechanical test results and applying quality control principles. What it cannot do is be there in the room, and that is still where mounted gets done. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: inspecting mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 19% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 9% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 73% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 128 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Preparing written documentation of electromechanical test results is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to written documentation of electromechanical test results, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding: a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes: ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether mounted is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near communicating measurement information effectively and accurately to meet customer requirements. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to precision instrument makers and repairers (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was dispensing opticians: only about 10% of its durable work is work you already do and it pays 28.8% less. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 23/100 here, with only 19% of the task list in the top band, and “calibrate devices by comparing measurements of environmental conditions to known standards” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Dispensing opticians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “shape lenses appropriately”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 10% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: You would be starting most of it from nothing: about 10% of the durable work in that job is work you do today, and the rest you would be learning while the bills carried on. It is a pay cut, in those words: £28,543 against your £40,062, 28.8% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Plant and machine operatives n.e.c.
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “maintain and calibrate optical equipment and tools according to supplier guidelines and industry standards”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £29,259 against your £40,062, 27.0% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Vehicle technicians, mechanics and electricians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already adhere to health and safety requirements in the workplace, and their equivalent is to adhere to health and safety practices in the workshop to ensure a safe…. Across both published task lists that is about 2% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 19% of its task weight, across 128 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like inspecting mounted or unmounted lenses for specification conformance using precision instruments arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which First-Line Supervisors of Mechanics, Installers, and Repairers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as First-Line Supervisors of Mechanics, Installers, and Repairers, Camera and Photographic Equipment Repairers, Medical Equipment Repairers, Watch and Clock Repairers, Precision Instrument and Equipment Repairers, All Other, Timing Device Assemblers and Adjusters and Ophthalmic Laboratory Technicians. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for precision instrument makers / repairers, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 19% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for precision instrument makers / repairers. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for precision instrument makers / repairers launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for precision instrument makers / repairers yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for precision instrument makers / repairers existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for precision instrument makers / repairers launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Precision instrument makers and repairers?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 128 official task statements scored for Precision instrument makers and repairers (United Kingdom, SOC 5224), 19% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 23 out of 100 (range 20–29, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Precision instrument makers and repairers” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Prepare written documentation of electromechanical test results” (93/100, very high); “Record test data in technical reports for equipment performance analysis” (93/100, very high); “Update equipment lists accurately and inform relevant parties of changes” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Precision instrument makers and repairers” stay human?: About 73% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Separate lenses in containers for further processing or storage” (0/100, minimal); “Repair faulty components using hand tools and soldering irons” (0/100, minimal); “Immerse spectacle frames in solutions to harden, soften, or dye frames” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Precision instrument makers and repairers” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 19% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 73% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Precision instrument makers and repairers calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 128 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
2 rows are marked low confidence, so treat them as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
61 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.