Will AI replace Programmers and software development professionals?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 145 official task statements scored for Programmers and software development professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2134), 61% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 63 out of 100 (range 57–69, band: high). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

What should someone working in “Programmers and software development professionals” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 61% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 14% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Programmers and software development professionals calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 145 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Programmers and software development professionals

designing role-play mechanics for new video games, writing systems to control access for users and remote systems and debuging programmes and solve complex technical problems during game production. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

Most tasks in this job are the kind AI has learned to do: applying appropriate recovery techniques to ensure the software solution being developed is not lost. The tasks, though, are not you.

Your move: three real directions from here ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 61%
changing shape: 26%
staying human: 14%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 63 out of 100 (57–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, across 145 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for programmers and software development professionals is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

It would be a lie to soften that; collaborating with games development team to meet project needs is what this work rebuilds around. The plan below starts there.

Your week, as this page understands it

Programmers and software development professionals design, develop, test, implement and maintain software systems on a range of platforms in order to meet the specifications and business objectives of the information system; they also design and develop specialist software e.g. for computer games. The job title says “programmers” or “software development professionals”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: collaborating with games development team to meet project needs. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But programmers and software development professionals is not one task. It is 145 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is collaborating with games development team to meet project needs, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 61%
changing shape: 26%
staying human: 14%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

5 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

83 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Applying appropriate recovery techniques to ensure the software solution being developed is not lost
This is reading one thing and writing another: appropriate recovery techniques in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Apply appropriate recovery techniques to ensure the software solution being developed is not lost.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Backup and recovery practice is well documented and largely handled by tooling already.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining systems by monitoring and correcting software defects
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Maintain systems by monitoring and correcting software defects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring for defects and correcting them is well-documented work that tools now support strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting unit testing of solutions during the Software Development Lifecycle to identify and resolve issues with adequate test code coverage
This is reading one thing and writing another: unit testing of solutions during the software development in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Conduct unit testing of solutions during the Software Development Lifecycle to identify and resolve issues with adequate test code coverage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing unit tests with good coverage is one of the most reliable current uses of coding tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing logical and maintainable software solutions in line with given specifications to meet the design requirements and organisational coding standards
This is reading one thing and writing another: logical in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Write logical and maintainable software solutions in line with given specifications to meet the design requirements and organisational coding standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing maintainable code to a specification and coding standards is exactly what these tools do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

39 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Identifying and reporting any impediments to progress in development activities to supervisors
The software now makes the first pass at any impediments, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Identify and report any impediments to progress in development activities to supervisors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Blockers can be summarised easily, but knowing what is really holding work up comes from the team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Practising continuous self-learning to keep up to date with industry trends and developments to enhance relevant skills and take responsibility for own professional development
The software now makes the first pass at continuous, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Practise continuous self-learning to keep up to date with industry trends and developments to enhance relevant skills and take responsibility for own professional development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Keeping your own skills current is something only the individual can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting delivery of software deployment trial phases to ensure correct deployment
The software now makes the first pass at delivery of software deployment trial phases, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Support delivery of software deployment trial phases to ensure correct deployment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Deployment steps are automated, but shepherding a trial through still needs an engineer watching.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

23 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Leading on the user experience
The ratings behind this row put the user experience well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 95 · 2134/01
Source: “Lead on the user experience (UX) design of the game, ensuring players have the best experience.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Tools can suggest improvements, but leading the player experience rests on a designer's taste and judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with games development team to meet project needs
The value here is that a specific person handles games development team and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 95 · 2134/01
Source: “Collaborate with games development team to meet project needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with a development team day to day depends on colleagues talking things through together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Presenting new game design concepts to management and technical colleagues
The value here is that a specific person handles new game design concepts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Present new game design concepts to management and technical colleagues, including artists, animators, and programmers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides are easy to prepare, but pitching a concept to colleagues is done in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 135 tasks

Compiling documentation of programme development and revisions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation of programme development in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Compile documentation of programme development and revisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compiling development and revision documentation from existing records is highly routine writing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Converting detailed workflow charts and diagrams into a series of instructions coded in a computer language
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed workflow charts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Convert detailed workflow charts and diagrams into a series of instructions coded in a computer language.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning a documented flowchart into working code is one of the clearest strengths of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing documentation with comments for understanding the programme
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Write documentation with comments for understanding the programme.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing comments and documentation explaining code is one of the most reliable uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Devising flow charts and diagrams describing logical operational steps of programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: flow charts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Devise flow charts and diagrams describing logical operational steps of programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing flow charts and diagrams from a described process is highly routine documentation work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing instruction manuals for new or upgraded products and systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: instruction manuals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Write instruction manuals for new or upgraded products and systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing instruction manuals from product information is highly structured writing software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting specific modifications made to projects or processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specific modifications made in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Document specific modifications made to projects or processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Documenting what was changed and why is highly routine writing drawn from the project's own records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording detailed notes on the development process
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed notes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Record detailed notes on the development process.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping detailed development notes is highly routine recording work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing game text and dialogue
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: game text in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Write game text and dialogue.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Game text and dialogue can be produced to a usable standard from huge amounts of published writing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating code to program video game features
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: code in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Create code to program video game features.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing game feature code is well-documented programming work that tools now produce to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Evaluating and debuging software code to ensure functionality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software code in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Evaluate and debug software code to ensure functionality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading code and finding defects is one of the strongest current uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Refactoring code to improve the design of existing code
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: code in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Refactor code to improve the design of existing code.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Restructuring existing code without changing behaviour is well-documented work tools handle reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing designs, codes, test plans or documentation to ensure quality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: designs, codes, test plans or documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01, 2134/02
Source: “Review designs, codes, test plans, or documentation to ensure quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing code, tests and documentation against standards is systematic checking software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Testing software to find and fix problems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01, 2134/03
Source: “Test software to find and fix problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Generating tests and fixing what they find is now routine, well-supported development work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing scripts to develop engaging storylines and character dialogues for video games
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scripts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Write scripts to develop engaging storylines and character dialogues for video games.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Storyline and dialogue scripts can be drafted to a usable standard from vast published writing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing systems using programming languages like C++ and C
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Design systems using programming languages like C++ and C.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing systems in C and C++ is heavily documented programming work these tools do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Delivering systems and coding that meet project specifications
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Deliver systems and code that meet project specifications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building code to a written specification is well-documented work these tools do to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing current literature to stay informed about game design technology and industry trends
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Review current literature to stay informed about game design technology and industry trends.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading and summarising published literature and industry trends is a strong use of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing and reviewing computer programmes applying knowledge of computer capabilities and symbolic logic
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer programmes applying knowledge of computer capabilities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Analyse and review computer programmes applying knowledge of computer capabilities and symbolic logic.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading existing code and explaining what it does is a well-supported, heavily documented task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting trial runs of software to ensure correct output and instruction accuracy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: trial runs of software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Conduct trial runs of software to ensure correct output and instruction accuracy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running trials of software and checking the output is largely automated already.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining project documentation detailing the development process and resources
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project documentation detailing the development process in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Maintain project documentation detailing the development process and resources utilised.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping project documentation current is structured writing tools produce to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Modifying existing programmes to enhance efficiency
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Modify existing programmes to enhance efficiency.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modifying existing code to run better is heavily documented work these tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reacting to problems and correct the programme
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: problems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “React to problems and correct the programme as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing a problem and correcting the code is a strong, well-supported use of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Updating and maintaining software packages for data storage and retrieval
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software packages in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Update and maintain software packages for data storage and retrieval.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Maintaining and updating data-handling software is well-documented, heavily supported work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing computer programmes for specific tasks like tracking inventory and controlling equipment
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Write computer programmes for specific tasks like tracking inventory and controlling equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing programs for defined tasks like inventory tracking is well-documented, well-supported work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Identifying and selecting the most appropriate technical solution
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the most appropriate technical solution in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Identify and select the most appropriate technical solution, considering coding best practices and quality standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Weighing technical options against documented best practice is a well-supported analysis task.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing and revising the programme
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the programme in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Review and revise the programme as appropriate.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing and revising existing code is well-documented work these tools support strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing websites using authoring languages and digital media
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: websites in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2134/02
Source: “Design websites using authoring languages and digital media.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building websites in standard authoring languages is heavily documented work with strong tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Researching and designing new software programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new software programmes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/03
Source: “Research and design new software programmes, including business applications and computer games.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Researching and designing new software is well-documented work these tools now do to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing and developing software systems to meet specific user requirements
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Design and develop software systems to meet specific user requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing and building software to stated requirements is heavily documented, well-supported work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing software prototypes to suit client needs and ensuring functionality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software prototypes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Design software prototypes to suit client needs and ensure functionality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing working prototypes quickly is one of the strongest current uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing code in programming or scripting languages like PHP or JavaScript
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: code in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Write code in programming or scripting languages like PHP or JavaScript.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing PHP or JavaScript is heavily documented programming work these tools produce to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing and identifying areas for modification in existing programmes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: areas in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Analyse and identify areas for modification in existing programmes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reading existing code and spotting what needs changing is a strong use of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing databases
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Develop databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing and building databases is heavily documented work with excellent tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Investigating new technologies to enhance software development processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: new technologies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Investigate new technologies to enhance software development processes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Investigating and summarising new technologies draws on abundant public material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Transferring information between databases using Application Programming Interfaces
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Transfer information between databases using Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Moving data between systems through documented APIs is well-supported programming work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing systems to control job scheduling
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Write systems to control job scheduling.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing job scheduling systems is well-documented programming work with strong tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating mobile-friendly versions of websites to enhance accessibility
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: mobile-friendly versions of websites in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Create mobile-friendly versions of websites to enhance accessibility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Making a site work well on mobile is heavily documented work with strong tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing prototypes to visualise the website or application design
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: prototypes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Develop prototypes to visualise the website or application design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing prototypes to show how a design will work is a strong current use of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Creating e-learning modules to facilitate online education
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: modules in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2134/03
Source: “Create e-learning modules to facilitate online education.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building e-learning modules from existing material is well-documented work tools now do to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Adjusting game design specifications to reflect project developments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: game design specifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Adjust game design specifications to reflect project developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Updating a design document to match project changes is structured writing software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating a concept document for the game
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a concept document in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Create a concept document for the game.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A game concept document follows a familiar structure that software can draft to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Transforming a rough idea into a detailed concept
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a rough idea in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Transform a rough idea into a detailed concept.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Expanding a rough idea into a detailed written concept is exactly what drafting tools do well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adapting existing concepts for computer game project development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: concepts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Adapt existing concepts for computer game project development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Adapting an existing concept for a new project is reworking documented material, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating gameplay test plans for internal and external test groups
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: gameplay test plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Create gameplay test plans for internal and external test groups.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Test plans follow documented structures that software drafts well from the game's own specification.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Integrating feedback into the original computer game design
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: feedback in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Integrate feedback into the original computer game design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Folding feedback into a design document is structured rewriting that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting market research to identify the preferences and needs of the target audience
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: market research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Conduct market research to identify the preferences and needs of the target audience.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering and summarising what an audience wants is research and analysis software does quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing design level documentation, including mechanics and guidelines, for projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: design level documentation, including mechanics and guidelines in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Develop design level documentation, including mechanics and guidelines, for projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Design documentation follows a set structure and is drafted well from the project's own material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Filling in project documentation at the relevant stages of the survey project
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: project documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Fill in project documentation at the relevant stages of the survey project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Completing project documentation at each stage is structured writing software drafts reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring artwork adheres to brand guidelines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: artwork adheres in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2134/01
Source: “Ensure artwork adheres to brand guidelines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking artwork against written brand guidelines is systematic comparison software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Applying security best practice to the software solution throughout the software development life-cycle
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: security best practice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Apply security best practice to the software solution throughout the software development life-cycle.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Security practice is well documented, though someone still has to be answerable for the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Breaking down software development activities into logical units of work to sequence and structure activities for delivering a high-quality product on the first attempt
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software development activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Break down software development activities into logical units of work to sequence and structure activities for delivering a high-quality product on the first attempt.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Breaking work into ordered units is planning that software drafts well from the specification.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Considering security implications of proposed design to ensure security is integrated from inception through development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: security implications of proposed design in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Consider security implications of proposed design to ensure security is integrated from inception through development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Security implications of a design are well documented, though the final call rests with an engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying the need for a suitable 'bug fix'
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Identify the need for a suitable 'bug fix', appropriate to the severity and priority of the issue identified.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether something needs fixing now is well-documented triage software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting progress accurately throughout the development lifecycle stages to ensure adequate audit trails of key worksteps so that the organisation can demonstrate how the product has been created for quality and commercial purposes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: progress accurately throughout the development lifecycle stages in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Report progress accurately throughout the development lifecycle stages to ensure adequate audit trails of key worksteps so that the organisation can demonstrate how the product has been created for quality and commercial purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Progress reporting for an audit trail is structured writing drawn from the project's own records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to testing of the end-to-end software solution to ensure a high-quality output
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: testing of the end-to-end software solution in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Contribute to testing of the end-to-end software solution to ensure a high-quality output.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Contributing to end-to-end testing is well-supported work, though someone signs off the result.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using estimating software to accurately interpret and applying project estimates
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Use estimating software to accurately interpret and apply project estimates.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Interpreting and applying estimates in software is structured calculation work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Programming computer systems to ensure optimal operation and security
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Programme computer systems to ensure optimal operation and security.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Configuring systems for performance and security is well-documented work with strong tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating network and system responsiveness to program instructions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: network in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2134/02
Source: “Investigate network and system responsiveness to program instructions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Measuring how a system responds is largely instrumented and analysed by software already.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting quality assurance tests to qualify the final product or system against specified standards
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quality assurance tests in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/03
Source: “Conduct quality assurance tests to qualify the final product or system against specified standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Testing a product against written standards is systematic checking software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing protective measures like firewalls and encryption
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: protective measures like firewalls in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 90 · 2134/03
Source: “Implement protective measures like firewalls and encryption.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Firewall and encryption setup is well documented, though an engineer remains answerable for it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing specific user requirements to inform software development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: specific user requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Analyse specific user requirements to inform software development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing stated user requirements is structured written work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing detailed technical specifications for product design and development
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed technical specifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Develop detailed technical specifications for product design and development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing detailed technical specifications is structured documentation software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing software systems to predict outcomes of design
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Develop software systems to predict outcomes of design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building predictive software is well-documented work, though the modelling choices need an engineer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining and administering systems software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems software in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Maintain and administer systems software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Systems administration is well-documented work with a great deal of automation already available.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing systems to control access for users and remote systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Write systems to control access for users and remote systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Access control systems are well documented, though the design decisions need an engineer's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing application layouts to improve user interaction
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: application layouts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Design application layouts to improve user interaction.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing application layouts is well-supported design work with plenty of documented patterns.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing methods to integrate different products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: methods in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Develop methods to integrate different products, ensuring compatibility, such as customising commercial databases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Integrating products and customising databases is documented engineering work with strong tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on modifications to improve the performance of current operating systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: modifications in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Advise on modifications to improve the performance of current operating systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommending performance improvements is documented analysis work software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing user interface layouts using software for optimal user experience
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: user interface layouts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Design user interface layouts using software for optimal user experience.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing interface layouts is well-supported design work with many documented patterns.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Integrating interactive multimedia elements, such as video and forums, into digital learning platforms
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: interactive multimedia elements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Integrate interactive multimedia elements, such as video and forums, into digital learning platforms.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Adding video and forum features to a learning platform is documented, well-supported development work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing puzzles for game play
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on puzzles, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Design puzzles for game play.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Puzzle ideas can be generated in volume from published examples, but tuning difficulty needs playtesting.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing storylines for new video games or game franchises
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on storylines, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Develop storylines for new video games or game franchises.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Storylines can be drafted from abundant published fiction, though distinctive ones still need a writer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Planning and detailing the setting
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on this work, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Plan and detail the setting, rules, and story flow of a new game.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting, rules and story flow can be drafted from many documented examples, then reworked by a designer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Debuging programmes and solve complex technical problems during game production
shifting to AI
It is the same call made over and over on programmes, with a right answer to check it against. That is what a model is trained on.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Debug programmes and solve complex technical problems during game production.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Routine bugs are found quickly by tools, but genuinely complex production problems still need a developer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Communicating outcomes from development activities to team members and other stakeholders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: outcomes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Communicate outcomes from development activities to team members and other stakeholders both internal and external.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up and sending development updates is routine communication software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering a suitably documented deployable solution to the customer
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a suitably documented deployable solution in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2134/02
Source: “Deliver a suitably documented deployable solution to the customer for their use (Software Development Lifecycle -Deploy phase).” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Packaging and documenting a deployable release is structured, well-supported work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Clarify the actions the programme is intended to perform
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the actions the programme in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Clarify the actions the programme is intended to perform.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting out clearly what the software should do is specification writing tools draft well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Converting customer requirements into technical specifications to accurately reflect expectations in software products
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: customer requirements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2134/02, 2134/03
Source: “Convert customer requirements into technical specifications to accurately reflect expectations in software products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning stated customer requirements into technical specifications is structured writing software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing operational documentation in collaboration with technical authors
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: operational documentation in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Write operational documentation in collaboration with technical authors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Operational documentation is structured writing software drafts well from the system's own material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing role-play mechanics for new video games
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at role-play mechanics, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2134/01
Source: “Design role-play mechanics for new video games.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can propose mechanics from published game design patterns, but making them fun still needs a designer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing a detailed concept
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at a detailed concept, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Implement a detailed concept.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning a concept into something built is substantial work software supports rather than completes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Completing game development tasks under pressure to meet project deadlines
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at game development tasks under pressure, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Complete game development tasks under pressure to meet project deadlines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tools speed the work up, but delivering under deadline pressure is the developer's own responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing storyboards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at storyboards, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Design storyboards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Storyboards can be roughed out by software, though the final sequencing is a designer's call.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing drawings for storyboards or other preparatory visualisations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at drawings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Prepare drawings for storyboards or other preparatory visualisations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Rough visualisations can be generated, though preparing usable storyboard drawings still needs an artist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using computer modelling and animation software to make characters and scenes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at computer, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Use computer modelling and animation software to make characters and scenes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Modelling and animation tools automate a lot, but building characters and scenes still needs an artist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing initial game sketches using graphical design software
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at initial game sketches, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Prepare initial game sketches using graphical design software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Initial sketches can be generated, though shaping them into something usable needs a designer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or evaluating various art forms to generate new game design ideas
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at various art forms, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Review or evaluate various art forms to generate new game design ideas.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Software can survey and summarise other art forms, but the creative leap belongs to the designer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating high-quality artwork for a game
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at high-quality artwork, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Create high-quality artwork for a game, including textures, characters, and environments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Generators produce usable textures and assets, but high-quality game artwork still needs an artist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing two-dimensional concept layouts
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at two-dimensional concept layouts, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/01
Source: “Prepare two-dimensional concept layouts.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Concept layouts can be generated quickly, though selecting and refining them needs a designer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating special effects and add sound and animation to electronic publications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at special effects, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2134/01
Source: “Create special effects and add sound and animation to electronic publications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Effects, sound and animation can be generated, but assembling them well still needs a producer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating technical knowledge and skills through courses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical knowledge, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Update technical knowledge and skills through courses, manuals, and new applications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping your own technical knowledge current is the individual's own effort.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and implementing relevant new technologies and industry trends
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at relevant new technologies, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Assess and implement relevant new technologies and industry trends.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: New technology can be summarised quickly, but deciding what to adopt is an engineering judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adapting off-the-shelf VLE products
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at off-the-shelf VLE products, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2134/03
Source: “Adapt off-the-shelf VLE products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Adapting an off-the-shelf learning platform is documented configuration work with decent tool support.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing feedback from the art lead by making changes to the artwork
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at feedback, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Implement feedback from the art lead by making changes to the artwork produced.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Some art changes can be automated, but interpreting an art lead's feedback still needs an artist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ensuring risks are mitigated after software's final release
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risks are mitigated after software's final release, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Ensure risks are mitigated after software's final release.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Post-release risk can be monitored automatically, but deciding what to act on rests with engineers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing change management processes to improve software development quality
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at change management processes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Implement change management processes to improve software development quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Change processes can be drafted, but getting a team to actually follow them needs a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing their own continued personal and professional development plan
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at their own continued personal and professional development plan, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Implement their own continued personal and professional development plan.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: A personal development plan is about the individual's own choices and effort.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting software compatibility tests with programmes and hardware
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at software compatibility tests, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Conduct software compatibility tests with programmes and hardware.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Compatibility testing is largely automated, but hardware combinations sometimes need physical rigs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing games for a range of devices and platforms that engage and capture user imagination
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at games, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2134/01
Source: “Design games for a range of devices and platforms that engage and capture user imagination.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Designing a game that genuinely captures imagination is original creative work software only assists with.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with game artists and designers to create game visuals
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at game artists, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Collaborate with game artists and designers to create game visuals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Visual concepts can be generated, but agreeing the look happens through back-and-forth between artists.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating original ideas for projects to develop innovative gaming experiences
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at original ideas, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2134/01
Source: “Create original ideas for projects to develop innovative gaming experiences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Genuinely original game ideas are creative work where tools offer prompts rather than answers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with management and marketing teams to promote games
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at management, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Coordinate with management and marketing teams to promote games.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Marketing material is easy to draft, but coordinating across teams relies on people working together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Defining requirements for online features in consultation with multiple stakeholders
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at requirements, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Define requirements for online features in consultation with multiple stakeholders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Requirements can be written up quickly, but agreeing them across stakeholders is a human negotiation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Requesting feedback from design and technical staff for game design
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at feedback, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Request feedback from design and technical staff for game design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Asking colleagues for honest feedback depends on the working relationships behind the request.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Allocating work to programming personnel for project development
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at work, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Allocate work to programming personnel for project development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Allocating work depends on knowing individual people's strengths and current workload.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting computer operators or system analysts in defining and resolving problems in running computer programmes through consultation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at computer operators, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Assist computer operators or system analysts in defining and resolving problems in running computer programmes through consultation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Helping colleagues pin down a problem happens in conversation with the people seeing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Resolving specific engineering problems by consulting with engineering staff and other relevant personnel
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific engineering problems, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Resolve specific engineering problems by consulting with engineering staff and other relevant personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working an engineering problem out with colleagues depends on the discussion between them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting others in meeting these service levels and requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at this work, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Support others in meeting these service levels and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Helping colleagues meet service commitments is about supporting people, not producing a document.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging with clients to understand their needs and requirements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2134/03
Source: “Engage with clients to understand their needs and requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients explain what they actually need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating with programmers involved in the project
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at programmers, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Communicate with programmers involved in the project.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Day-to-day coordination with other programmers is conversation between the people doing the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in technical design meetings to develop software solutions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical design meetings, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Participate in technical design meetings to develop software solutions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Technical design meetings work through the discussion between the engineers in them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting detailed requirements from clients and users for IT projects
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at detailed requirements, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Collect detailed requirements from clients and users for IT projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clients and users say what they really need in conversation with someone they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with clients and colleagues on the maintenance of software systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Consult with clients and colleagues on the maintenance of software systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Maintenance decisions are worked out in discussion with the people who rely on the system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Obtaining information on limitations or capabilities for data processing projects by speaking with data processing or project managers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Obtain information on limitations or capabilities for data processing projects by speaking with data processing or project managers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Finding out what is actually possible means asking the managers who run the systems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing new computer operating systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new computer operating systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Write new computer operating systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Writing a new operating system from scratch is deep original engineering work tools only assist with.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assigning, coordinating and reviewing work and activities of programming personnel
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles work and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Assign, coordinate, and review work and activities of programming personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Assigning and reviewing a team’s work is management that runs on knowing the people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Balancing and adjusting gameplay experiences to ensure the product's critical and commercial success
staying human
The ratings behind this row put gameplay experiences well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Balance and adjust gameplay experiences to ensure the product's critical and commercial success.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the five ratings behind the score, with no single dominant reason.
The rating behind it: Balancing a game rests on playtest feel and commercial judgement that is not written down anywhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training quality assurance testers to play the game for proper testing
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles quality assurance testers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Train quality assurance testers to play the game for proper testing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guides are easy to write, but testers learn the job fastest from someone showing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing support during software trials to ensure customers understand and can correctly apply the product
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles support during software trials and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/02
Source: “Provide support during software trials to ensure customers understand and can correctly apply the product.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Guidance is easy to write, but customers trialling new software usually want a person alongside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting training sessions for users on system functionalities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles sessions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2134/02
Source: “Conduct training sessions for users on system functionalities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy to produce, but users learn a new system best from someone present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with teachers to deliver educational content
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles teachers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Work with teachers to deliver educational content.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Content can be drafted quickly, but working out what teachers need happens with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reinstalling software programmes to fix machine malfunctions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: software programmes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2134/02
Source: “Reinstall software programmes to fix machine malfunctions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Reinstalling software often means someone at the machine, though remote fixes are common.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with developers, animators and quality assurance testers to ensure game quality
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles developers, animators and quality assurance testers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2134/01
Source: “Work with developers, animators, and quality assurance testers to ensure game quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a game finished depends on developers, animators and testers coordinating with each other.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with other designers and product design teams to develop new products
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles other designers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Collaborate with other designers and product design teams to develop new products.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Developing new products with other design teams happens through discussion between the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Working alone or within a larger team overseen by a lead designer
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles alone and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Work alone or within a larger team overseen by a lead designer.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: How you work within a team under a lead designer is about people, not output.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with computer manufacturers and other users to develop new programming methods
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles computer manufacturers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2134/02
Source: “Collaborate with computer manufacturers and other users to develop new programming methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Developing genuinely new methods with manufacturers and other users is collaborative pioneering work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Working closely with IT project managers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles IT project managers and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/03
Source: “Work closely with IT project managers, database programmers and multimedia programmers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working closely with project managers and other programmers is about people coordinating with each other.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising engineers, technicians, researchers or other staff
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles engineers, technicians, researchers or other staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2134/03
Source: “Supervise engineers, technicians, researchers, or other staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising staff rests on knowing individual people and being trusted by them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Facilitating design discussions among game development teams
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles design discussions among game development teams and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2134/01
Source: “Facilitate design discussions among game development teams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a design discussion depends on reading the room and drawing colleagues out.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Talking with colleagues to understand audience interests and reactions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2134/01
Source: “Talk with colleagues to understand audience interests and reactions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Understanding how audiences react comes from talking with colleagues who have watched them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with printers, copywriters, photographers, stylists and illustrators on projects
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles printers, copywriters, photographers, stylists and illustrators and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2134/03
Source: “Collaborate with printers, copywriters, photographers, stylists, and illustrators on projects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working with printers, photographers and illustrators depends on relationships between the people involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training junior members of staff to enhance their skills and performance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles junior members of staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2134/02
Source: “Train junior members of staff to enhance their skills and performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Junior staff develop through a mentor who knows them and takes an interest.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attending conferences, seminars and training sessions to stay informed about field developments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conferences, seminars and training sessions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2134/01
Source: “Attend conferences, seminars, and training sessions to stay informed about field developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Attending conferences and training is about being there and meeting people in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in educational programmes and workshops to enhance knowledge in game design
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: educational programmes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2134/01
Source: “Participate in educational programmes and workshops to enhance knowledge in game design.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Attending workshops and courses is something the individual has to do themselves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Constructing full scale mock-ups for parts of products and production tools
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: full scale mock-ups, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2134/01
Source: “Construct full scale mock-ups for parts of products and production tools.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Building a full-scale mock-up is workshop work done with hands and materials.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £56,900a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 543,400in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: appropriate recovery techniques in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: applying appropriate recovery techniques to ensure the software solution being developed is not lost and maintaining systems by monitoring and correcting software defects. What it cannot do is be trusted in person, which is what games development team runs on: someone specific doing it and standing behind it. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

The exposed part of your job is the biggest part, and I am not going to dress that up: applying appropriate recovery techniques to ensure the software solution being developed is not lost is work today's tools do quickly and cheaply, and that is not coming back.

So, given all that: 61% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 26% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 14% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 145 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

What you have that the software does not is collaborating with games development team to meet project needs, plus the years of knowing when something looks wrong before you can say why. That is the raw material for everything below.

This week: one thing

Sit on the machine's side of the desk. Pick one real piece of appropriate recovery techniques you would normally do yourself, let whatever software you already have take the first pass at it, and then go through what it produced and write down every single thing it got wrong. One evening this week. Do not fix anything yet. Just catch it.

What you end up holding: a written list of the machine’s mistakes, in your handwriting
How long it takes: an evening, or an hour if you pick one job rather than one client

If you can’t run software on your employer’s or your clients’ data: Do the same hunt on paper. Take one printed piece of appropriate recovery techniques, work through it the way you always do, and mark every point where you made a call rather than followed a rule. Same evening, same list, nothing to log into and nobody to ask permission from. That list is the same artifact: it is the judgment written down.

Over the next 90 days

Change one sentence about what you do. Not on a CV. Out loud, to whoever pays you. From “my job is applying appropriate recovery techniques to ensure the software solution being developed is not lost” to “I check what the software does and tell you what it means.” Your error list from this week is what makes that sentence true instead of a claim, so use it: show it once, to one person, inside the next ninety days. Same skills, priced as judgment rather than as typing.

Over the next 12 months

Walk toward the end of this job that answers for things, and get it recognised. Pick the one part of collaborating with games development team to meet project needs you are already best at, and spend the year making it formal: a qualification, a named responsibility, a specialism people ask for by name. Price it honestly: that is evenings, it is months rather than weeks, and the seats are competitive because everyone in your position is looking at the same door. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to programmers and software development professionals (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was web design professionals: only about 2% of its durable work is work you already do, it is under the same pressure this job is, it pays 14.6% less and there are far fewer of those jobs than of yours. I am not going to pretend that is comfortable news: 61% of your own task list is already in the top exposure band. But the answer on this evidence is not a sideways jump into a job with the same problem. It is to walk toward the end of this one that answers for things. “collaborate with games development team to meet project needs” is the part that stays with a person, and spending a year getting formally recognised for it beats a standing start somewhere else.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Web design professionals
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already collaborate with games development team to meet project needs, and their equivalent is to collaborate with other designers and product design teams to develop new products. Across both published task lists that is about 2% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 65% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (66/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it. It is a pay cut, in those words: £48,629 against your £56,914, 14.6% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 31,200 of those jobs against 543,400 of yours (ONS via Nomis), 6% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
IT technicians
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “identify and report any impediments to progress in development activities to supervisors”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 2% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 60% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (61/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it. It is a pay cut, in those words: £35,259 against your £56,914, 38.0% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 86,000 of those jobs against 543,400 of yours (ONS via Nomis), 16% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Information technology professionals n.e.c.
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already test software to find and fix problems, and their equivalent is to fix identified IT or web-related problems. Across both published task lists that is about 2% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. I will not move you off one melting floe onto another: 62% of its own task list already scores in the top exposure band (63/100 in this release), so the same software is eating it.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 61% of its task weight, across 145 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
“It’s too late for me to become something else”
You are not starting from zero, and the page shows why: collaborating with games development team to meet project needs is work the software cannot do and you already do it. The move above is a repricing of what you know, not a new career. Nobody who has just left college has that.
“I should learn to code”
Almost certainly not. The value in your job is moving toward checking, deciding and answering for the output, not toward writing the software. A weekend of Python will not change your position; the error list from this week will.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Computer Programmers is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Computer Programmers, Software Developers and Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for software developer, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

The working behind that

Every current Space explicitly targets non-developers.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 61% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for software developer. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for software developers launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for software developers yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for software developers existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for software developers launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Programmers and software development professionals?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 145 official task statements scored for Programmers and software development professionals (United Kingdom, SOC 2134), 61% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 63 out of 100 (range 57–69, band: high). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Programmers and software development professionals” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Compile documentation of programme development and revisions” (93/100, very high); “Convert detailed workflow charts and diagrams into a series of instructions coded in a computer language” (93/100, very high); “Write documentation with comments for understanding the programme” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Programmers and software development professionals” stay human?: About 14% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Construct full scale mock-ups for parts of products and production tools” (0/100, minimal); “Participate in educational programmes and workshops to enhance knowledge in game design” (8/100, minimal); “Attend conferences, seminars, and training sessions to stay informed about field developments” (8/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Programmers and software development professionals” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 61% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 14% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Programmers and software development professionals calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 145 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
5 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.