Will AI replace Specialist medical practitioners and consultants?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 379 official task statements scored for Specialist medical practitioners and consultants (United Kingdom, SOC 2212), 10% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 28 out of 100 (range 23–34, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

What should someone working in “Specialist medical practitioners and consultants” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 10% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 66% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Specialist medical practitioners and consultants calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 379 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

UK dataswitch to US

Specialist medical practitioners and consultants

developing personalised treatment plans based on patient assessments, performing reconstructive surgery on patients recovering from burns or illness and performing surgeries on patients from foetuses to adolescents to treat various conditions. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI changes the edges of this job, not the middle: monitoring and evaluating patient progress to adjust treatment plans is work software can't reach.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 10%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 66%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 28 out of 100 (23–34 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 379 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for specialist medical practitioners and consultants is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

What shifts is distributing reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors. This page scores what today's tools actually do, not headlines.

Your week, as this page understands it

Specialist medical practitioners and consultants specialise in particular areas of modern medicine, diagnose mental and physical injuries, disorders and diseases within their specialism, prescribe and give treatment, recommend preventative action, and conduct medical education and research activities The job title says “specialist medical practitioners” or “consultants”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: monitoring and evaluating patient progress to adjust treatment plans. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But specialist medical practitioners and consultants is not one task. It is 379 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is monitoring and evaluating patient progress to adjust treatment plans, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 10%
changing shape: 24%
staying human: 66%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

Shifting to AI

50 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Distributing reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports of diagnostic procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Distribute reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Sending reports out to the referring doctors is routine distribution that systems already handle end to end.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing initial data for abnormalities in white or red blood cells
This is reading one thing and writing another: initial data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/06
Source: “Review initial data for abnormalities in white or red blood cells.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Blood analysers and pattern software already flag abnormal cells reliably, with a scientist confirming what matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Keeping detailed records of decisions to document patient treatment plans
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed records of decisions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/11
Source: “Keep detailed records of decisions to document patient treatment plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recording decisions and treatment plans from the consultation is routine documentation these tools handle reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Taking detailed notes of patient interactions for accurate psychiatric assessments
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed notes of patient interactions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/11
Source: “Take detailed notes of patient interactions for accurate psychiatric assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Turning a consultation into detailed structured notes is now one of the most dependable uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

70 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records
The software now makes the first pass at accurate, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/06, 2212/07, 2212/08, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/11, 2212/13
Source: “Maintain accurate and confidential patient or client records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Notes can be drafted automatically, but a consultant must own and confirm the patient's record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording patient information, including identification, medical history and examination results
The software now makes the first pass at patient information, including identification, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/02, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/06, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/11, 2212/13
Source: “Record patient information, including identification, medical history, and examination results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Note-taking tools work well, but the consultant must confirm what enters the patient's legal record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Referring patients to other healthcare practitioners
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 65 · 2212/03, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/08, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13, 2212/14
Source: “Refer patients to other healthcare practitioners as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A referral is a clinical decision made and signed by the registered doctor responsible for the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

259 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Monitoring and evaluating patient progress to adjust treatment plans
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patient progress, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/02, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/06, 2212/07, 2212/08, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13
Source: “Monitor and evaluate patient progress to adjust treatment plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Adjusting treatment is a clinical decision only the responsible consultant may make.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining procedures, test results and treatments to patients
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for procedures, test results and treatments, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/02, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/06, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13
Source: “Explain procedures, test results, and treatments to patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining results is a conversation where the patient's trust in their consultant carries much of the value.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing activities of nurses and healthcare assistants
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for activities of nurses, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13, 2212/14
Source: “Direct activities of nurses and healthcare assistants.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing ward staff is live supervision by the responsible doctor, not something a tool can take on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

Show the other 369 tasks

Applying computer programming to analyse data in scientific research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/08
Source: “Apply computer programming to analyse data in scientific research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 100 out of 100 (96–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing code to analyse research data is one of the clearest and most reliable strengths of current tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Documenting detailed observations and interactions with clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: detailed observations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/07
Source: “Document detailed observations and interactions with clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up detailed session notes from what was said is one of the most reliable things these tools now do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Analysing test data using computer modelling software
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: test data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Analyse test data using computer modelling software.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysing data with modelling software is among the most reliable things these tools do, with results checked by the researcher.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing patient clinical data to assist pathologists in pathology reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: patient clinical data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/09
Source: “Provide patient clinical data to assist pathologists in pathology reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 88 out of 100 (84–92 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Pulling relevant clinical details out of the record for the pathologist is straightforward retrieval and summarising.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Marketing a business to a target audience
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: a business in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2212/07
Source: “Market a business to a target audience.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 85 out of 100 (81–89 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Marketing copy, targeting and campaign material are among the strongest and most abundantly documented uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Procuring supplies and equipment for surgeries
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: supplies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/14
Source: “Procure supplies and equipment for surgeries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 85 out of 100 (81–89 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ordering surgical supplies and equipment is procurement paperwork that software handles quickly from usage data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reading current literature to stay informed about field-specific developments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: current literature in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/03
Source: “Read current literature to stay informed about field-specific developments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Published research is fully available and summarising it quickly is one of the strongest things these tools do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining knowledge of the latest treatments for neurological disorders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: knowledge of the latest treatments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Maintain knowledge of the latest treatments for neurological disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: New treatment evidence is published openly, and summarising it is one of the strongest uses of these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Carrying out regular literature reviews of neuroscience research
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regular literature reviews of neuroscience research in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Carry out regular literature reviews of neuroscience research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Research literature is published openly and summarising it well is one of the strongest current capabilities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Having excellent knowledge of physiology
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: excellent knowledge of physiology in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/11
Source: “Have excellent knowledge of physiology, anatomy, psychology, pharmacology and mental health law, as well as an awareness of the social factors that influence mental health.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (76–90 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: This body of medical and legal knowledge is fully published, and recalling it accurately is a clear strength.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Documenting and sharing research findings to contribute to scientific knowledge
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: research findings in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/11
Source: “Document and share research findings to contribute to scientific knowledge.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing up and sharing findings draws on openly published literature and is strong ground for these tools.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Summarising patient treatment in administrative records
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: patient treatment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/01
Source: “Summarise patient treatment in administrative records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Summarising treatment from the notes is exactly what these tools do well; the doctor checks and signs the record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing discharge letters for patients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: discharge letters in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2212/01
Source: “Write discharge letters for patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Discharge letters follow a set structure and pull straight from the notes, needing only the doctor's check and signature.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining accurate records on therapy interventions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/02
Source: “Maintain accurate records on therapy interventions, issues, and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping accurate treatment records from what happened in the session is straightforward, checked and signed by the clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Producing quantitative data reports to inform medical staff about a patient's condition
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: quantitative data reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/06
Source: “Produce quantitative data reports to inform medical staff about a patient's condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Turning laboratory numbers into a clear report is routine work software already does, with a scientist checking it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring stock levels and ordering supplies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: stock levels in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/07
Source: “Monitor stock levels and order supplies as necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reordering runs straight off usage data, though someone still has to check what is actually on the shelf.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Generating medical reports based on patient history and progress
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: medical reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Generate medical reports based on patient history and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Writing a medical report from the history and progress notes is well-structured work these tools do reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Logging detailed treatment records, personal, lifestyle and declared medical information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Log detailed treatment records including personal, lifestyle, and declared medical information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Building a detailed treatment record from what was said and done is routine documentation work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing paperwork to inform other healthcare professionals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: paperwork in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Prepare paperwork to inform other healthcare professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Producing handover paperwork for other clinicians follows a set structure and pulls straight from the record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Recording the performance of all procedures carried out
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the performance of all procedures carried out in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Record the performance of all procedures carried out.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Logging every procedure carried out is structured record work drawn straight from the system.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Comparing nuclear medicine procedures with other types of procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: nuclear medicine procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Compare nuclear medicine procedures with other types of procedures, such as computed tomography, ultrasonography, MRI, and angiography.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Comparing what different scan types can show is textbook knowledge that is thoroughly published and summarises well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing factual and interpretative reports
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: factual in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Prepare factual and interpretative reports, figures, and diagrams.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Producing reports, tables and diagrams from results is well-structured work these tools do quickly and consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Recording patients' treatment plans, interventions, outcomes or planning revisions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: patients' treatment plans, interventions, outcomes or planning revisions in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/13
Source: “Record patients' treatment plans, interventions, outcomes, or plan revisions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recording plans, interventions and outcomes is structured documentation work these tools handle reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining accurate case histories of patients to support surgical care
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: accurate case histories of patients in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Maintain accurate case histories of patients to support surgical care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping accurate case histories is structured record work drawn straight from what happened in the consultation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing to GPs to update them on patients' conditions and treatments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: gps in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Write to GPs to update them on patients' conditions and treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Letters to GPs follow a standard structure and pull straight from the notes, needing only a doctor's check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Performing administrative tasks relevant to the job role
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: this work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/14
Source: “Perform administrative tasks relevant to the job role.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Routine paperwork and scheduling around the clinical job is ordinary office work that software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing health promotion information to patients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health promotion information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/02
Source: “Provide health promotion information to patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 74 out of 100 (70–78 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Health information leaflets and tailored explanations are abundantly documented and produce very well in writing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Advising patients on the need for annual skin health screenings
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: patients in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/03
Source: “Advise patients on the need for annual skin health screenings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 74 out of 100 (70–78 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advice about yearly skin checks is standard, well-published information that tailors easily to someone's risk factors.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Suggesting exercise routines to complement homeopathic treatments
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: exercise routines in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/07
Source: “Suggest exercise routines to complement homeopathic treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 74 out of 100 (70–78 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Exercise routines are abundantly documented and tailor well in writing to someone's stated ability and goals.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing computer-processed digital images for quality
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: computer-processed digital images in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Review computer-processed digital images for quality.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Automatic image quality checking is a well-solved job that software does faster and more consistently than eyes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Promoting self-employed work to attract clients
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: self-employed work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 50 · 2212/07
Source: “Promote self-employed work to attract clients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 70 out of 100 (66–74 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Promotional material writes very well, though winning clients as a sole practitioner still leans on personal reputation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Checking the client's medical history
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the client's medical history in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/07
Source: “Check the client's medical history, diet and lifestyle.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Taking a structured history of health, diet and lifestyle is exactly what a well-designed questionnaire and summary can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supporting internal audits to ensure regulatory compliance
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: internal audits in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/02
Source: “Support internal audits to ensure regulatory compliance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Gathering audit evidence and checking it against standards is systematic work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording test results, instrument readings and details of equipment malfunctions and maintenance work
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: test results in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/06
Source: “Record test results, instrument readings, and details of equipment malfunctions and maintenance work.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recording results and instrument readings is routine logging that laboratory systems largely capture on their own.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Performing audits and researching to improve medical practices and patient care
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: audits in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Perform audits and research to improve medical practices and patient care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Clinical audit is structured analysis of records and results, which software handles well before a clinician reviews it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing experiments to explore the brain and nervous system
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: experiments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Design experiments to explore the brain and nervous system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Experimental designs draft well from the published literature, with the research team refining and approving them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Auditing information to ensure it's accurate
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/10
Source: “Audit information to ensure it's accurate and current.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking records for accuracy and currency is systematic work software does thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or transmiting images and information using picture archiving and communication systems
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: images in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Review or transmit images and information using picture archiving and communication systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Moving and reviewing images on the hospital system is largely screen work that software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising patients on risk factors of neurological disorders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: patients in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Advise patients on risk factors of neurological disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Risk factor information is abundantly published and explains well in writing, with the clinician confirming what applies.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing and implementing health education campaigns to raise public awareness
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: health education campaigns in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Develop and implement health education campaigns to raise public awareness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Campaign material and planning are well-documented communications work that tools produce quickly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning the department's workload as part of managerial responsibilities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the department's workload in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 60 · 2212/10
Source: “Plan the department's workload as part of managerial responsibilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Planning departmental workload is scheduling and capacity work that software handles well, with the manager deciding priorities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing about limitations of radioactive materials in therapy
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: limitations of radioactive materials in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Inform about limitations of radioactive materials in therapy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (60–68 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: What radioactive treatments can and cannot do is thoroughly published and explains clearly in writing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Preparing and submitting case reports to government or mental health agencies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: case reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 70 · 2212/11
Source: “Prepare and submit case reports to government or mental health agencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 63 out of 100 (56–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Case reports draft well from the record, but a statutory report to an agency must be made by the responsible clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Calculating radioisotope dosages
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: radioisotope dosages in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Calculate radioisotope dosages.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 63 out of 100 (59–67 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dose calculation is arithmetic from published tables, but the dose must be authorised by a registered practitioner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Advising clients on maintaining health and promoting overall wellbeing
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: clients in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 80 · 2212/07
Source: “Advise clients on maintaining health and promoting overall wellbeing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (57–65 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: General wellbeing advice is abundantly published and personalises well in writing, though clients value hearing it from someone.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing dietary advice to promote healthy eating habits
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: dietary advice in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 75 · 2212/07
Source: “Provide dietary advice to promote healthy eating habits.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (57–65 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Healthy eating advice is thoroughly published and tailors easily, though people act on it when a practitioner explains it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Publishing scientific papers detailing research findings
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at scientific papers detailing research findings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Publish scientific papers detailing research findings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 58 out of 100 (51–65 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tools draft sections well, but original findings and authorship stay with the researcher.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Logging type and amount of anaesthesia
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at type, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2212/01
Source: “Log type and amount of anaesthesia administered.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Anaesthetic machines already record what was given; producing the log is routine, with the anaesthetist confirming it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Logging patient condition throughout procedure
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patient condition throughout procedure, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Log patient condition throughout procedure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Monitors capture the readings automatically, so building the record of a patient's condition is largely handled already.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assessing cardiac physiology and calculating valve areas from blood flow velocity measurements
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at cardiac physiology, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Assess cardiac physiology and calculate valve areas from blood flow velocity measurements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These calculations are standard and already automated in scanning software, with the consultant confirming the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Comparing measurements of heart wall thickness and chamber sizes to standards to identify abnormalities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at measurements of heart wall thickness, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Compare measurements of heart wall thickness and chamber sizes to standards to identify abnormalities, using the results of an echocardiogram.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software already measures and flags these values, but a consultant's registration stands behind the report that drives the patient's care.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording patient information for medical records
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patient information, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/06, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13
Source: “Record patient information for medical records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Note-taking tools work well, but the consultant must confirm what enters the medical record.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting appropriate techniques for different types of haematological analysis
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at appropriate techniques, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2212/06
Source: “Select appropriate techniques for different types of haematological analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing the right laboratory technique follows published method guidance, with a qualified scientist confirming the choice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Making decisions on further haematological analysis and recommending additional tests where appropriate to help with the diagnostic process
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at decisions, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/06
Source: “Make decisions on further haematological analysis and recommend additional tests where appropriate to help with the diagnostic process.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Deciding which extra tests would help follows documented diagnostic pathways and is done from the results on screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining accurate records
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at accurate records, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/06
Source: “Maintain accurate records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Records can be drafted automatically, but a doctor must confirm the clinical content entering a patient's file.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing records to assess treatment plans and outcomes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at records, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Review records to assess treatment plans and outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reviewing records to check plans and outcomes is structured desk work over documents already held digitally.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting patient notes detailing treatment and progress
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patient notes detailing treatment, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/10
Source: “Document patient notes detailing treatment and progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treatment notes can be drafted automatically, but the consultant must confirm what the record says.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing clinical history and previous imaging to inform diagnosis
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clinical history, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Review clinical history and previous imaging to inform diagnosis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pulling together history and previous scans is retrieval and comparison work, confirmed by the reporting clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Incorporating speech and occupational therapy into rehabilitation plans
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at speech, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/13
Source: “Incorporate speech and occupational therapy into rehabilitation plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Combining therapy inputs into one plan is document work drawing on well-published rehabilitation guidance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating patient records accordingly
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patient records, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Update patient records accordingly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Updating records is easy for software, but the clinical content stays the doctor's responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining procedures to maintain surgical standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at procedures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Determine procedures to maintain surgical standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Standards and procedure documents draft well from published guidance, with the surgical team approving them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing individuals and groups on ways to preserve health and prevent disease
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at individuals, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2212/01
Source: “Instruct individuals and groups on ways to preserve health and prevent disease.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Prevention advice is well documented and easy to produce, but people listen better to a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying abnormal or unexpected results and reporting back and following up with requesting clinicians
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at abnormal, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2212/06
Source: “Identify abnormal or unexpected results and report back and follow up with requesting clinicians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (49–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Laboratory systems already flag results outside normal ranges, and the follow-up message drafts easily; a scientist confirms it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assisting colleagues in interpreting specific test results
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at colleagues, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/06
Source: “Assist colleagues in interpreting specific test results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Explaining what a test result means draws on abundant published reference material and writes up clearly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Requesting diagnostic tests, FBCs, ECGs and x-rays
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at diagnostic tests, fbcs, ecgs and x-rays, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/02, 2212/03
Source: “Request diagnostic tests such as FBCs, ECGs, and x-rays.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 52 out of 100 (48–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing standard tests follows clear published rules, but x-ray requests must legally come from a registered clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Writing up imaging reports
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at imaging reports, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Write up imaging reports.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 52 out of 100 (45–59 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Draft imaging reports are already produced automatically for standard studies, but a registered reporter must issue them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting results of diagnostic or laboratory tests
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at results of diagnostic, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Interpret results of diagnostic or laboratory tests.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 52 out of 100 (45–59 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Test interpretation follows published reference ranges and pathways, though the clinical conclusion is a doctor's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Applying relevant research findings to enhance professional practice
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at relevant research findings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/07
Source: “Apply relevant research findings to enhance professional practice.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 50 out of 100 (43–57 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Machines summarise the evidence well, but turning it into changed practice rests on the doctor's own clinical judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising healthcare professionals on patient care strategies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at healthcare professionals, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Advise healthcare professionals on patient care strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Written care guidance for colleagues drafts well from published evidence, though they expect a named clinician behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with doctors to interpret medical tests
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at doctors, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/06
Source: “Consult with doctors to interpret medical tests.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Interpreting tests draws on well-published reference material, though doctors expect a named scientist behind the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising other doctors on the treatment of neurological problems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at other doctors, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/08
Source: “Advise other doctors on the treatment of neurological problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Written specialist advice on treatment draws on abundant published evidence, though colleagues want a named consultant behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging hospital admissions for patient treatment and care
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at hospital admissions, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/10
Source: “Arrange hospital admissions for patient treatment and care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Admission arrangements follow set pathways, though the decision to admit is the doctor's clinical call.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collecting relevant information from sources
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at relevant information, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/11
Source: “Collect relevant information from sources such as GPs, social workers, or relatives for case assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Gathering and collating information from other services is retrieval and summarising work, checked by the assessing clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with doctors to coordinate patient treatment plans
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at doctors, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Consult with doctors to coordinate patient treatment plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating plans across doctors is largely correspondence and scheduling, which drafts and organises well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing patients' medical histories to predict anaesthesia response
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients' medical histories, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2212/01
Source: “Assess patients' medical histories to predict anaesthesia response.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Weighing a written medical history against known anaesthetic risks is records work, though the final judgement stays with the anaesthetist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing anaesthesia care plans to tailor anaesthetic management to individual patient needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at anaesthesia care plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Develop anaesthesia care plans to tailor anaesthetic management to individual patient needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: An anaesthetic plan drafts well from the notes and guidelines, but only a registered anaesthetist can adopt it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at laboratory tests, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/01, 2212/14
Source: “Order laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (43–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing which tests to request follows published guidance and is done at a screen, but a registered doctor must sign the request.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing treatment plans based on patient information and medical history
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at treatment plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Design treatment plans based on patient information and medical history.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treatment plans draft well from the notes and guidelines, but adopting one for a patient is a doctor's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending appropriate diagnostic procedures based on patient assessments
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at appropriate diagnostic procedures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/02, 2212/03
Source: “Recommend appropriate diagnostic procedures based on patient assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Suggesting which tests fit the picture follows documented pathways, though the request is a registered doctor's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing patients' medical conditions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients' medical conditions, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/02, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Diagnose patients' medical conditions using records, reports, test results, and examination information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Diagnostic support from records and results is strong, but the diagnosis is made by the registered doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Referring patients for appropriate screening relating to their condition
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/07
Source: “Refer patients for appropriate screening relating to their condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Screening referrals follow clear criteria, but the request must come from the responsible registered clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting the results of neuroimaging studies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the results of neuroimaging studies, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/08
Source: “Interpret the results of neuroimaging studies, including MRI, spect, and pet scans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Scan reading software is genuinely strong for standard cases, but the reported interpretation must come from a registered doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering laboratory analyses of patients' blood or cerebrospinal fluid
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at laboratory analyses of patients' blood, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Order laboratory analyses of patients' blood or cerebrospinal fluid.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (43–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing which laboratory tests to request follows published pathways, but the request must come from a registered doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering diagnostic tests and analysing the results
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at diagnostic tests, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/10
Source: “Order diagnostic tests and analyse the results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (43–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing tests and reading the numbers follows published pathways and is done at a screen, under a doctor's authority.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing standards for the protection of patients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at standards, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Establish standards for the protection of patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Protection standards are published in detail and draft well, but radiation rules must be set under qualified advice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing referrals to ensure patients receive a radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at referrals, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Manage referrals to ensure patients receive a radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Screening referrals against dose guidance is rule-based desk work, though justification is a regulated clinical act.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing procedure requests to determine applicability of procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at procedure requests, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Review procedure requests to determine applicability of procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking a request against protocol is rule-based screening, though justifying the exposure is legally a registered practitioner's act.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing government and organisational reports on birth
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at government, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/13
Source: “Prepare government and organisational reports on birth, death, and disease statistics, workforce evaluations, or the medical status of individuals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Statistical reporting is routine, but statements about an individual's medical status must come from a registered doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Arranging X-rays for patients
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at x-rays, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Arrange X-rays for patients as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: UK radiation rules allow only an entitled clinician to request imaging, so the request must be the doctor's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Interpreting results of preoperative tests and physical examinations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at results of preoperative tests, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Interpret results of preoperative tests and physical examinations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 47 out of 100 (40–54 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pre-operative results interpret against published criteria, but the fitness decision carries the doctor's responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising patients, parents or guardians and community members concerning diet, activity, hygiene and disease prevention
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients, parents or guardians and community members, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/02, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/06, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13
Source: “Advise patients, parents or guardians, and community members concerning diet, activity, hygiene, and disease prevention.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Prevention advice is well documented and drafts easily, though patients act on it because their consultant said it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising clients on selecting appropriate surgeons for their medical needs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/02
Source: “Advise clients on selecting appropriate surgeons for their medical needs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Matching a patient to the right surgeon draws on published records and outcomes, though people want a person's recommendation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating dandruff
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at dandruff, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/03
Source: “Treat dandruff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (42–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Dandruff advice and treatment are common, well-published and mostly handled with products anyone can buy.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Selecting herbal remedies for the treatment of illnesses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at herbal remedies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2212/07
Source: “Select herbal remedies for the treatment of illnesses, assisting the body’s healing process.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Herbal remedy uses are well documented in reference texts, though clients come for a practitioner's personal recommendation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising patients on the use and effects of particular remedies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/07
Source: “Advise patients on the use and effects of particular remedies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Information about remedies and their effects is documented and explains well in writing, but clients want it from their practitioner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining the optimal use of homeopathic remedies for various conditions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the optimal use of homeopathic remedies, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/07
Source: “Determine the optimal use of homeopathic remedies for various conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Homeopathic prescribing follows published repertories, which suits text tools, though clients expect a practitioner's choice.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adjusting herbal medicine prescriptions based on patient progress
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at herbal medicine prescriptions, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/07
Source: “Adjust herbal medicine prescriptions based on patient progress if needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Adjusting a remedy against reported progress follows documented practice, though the client expects their practitioner to make the change.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Teaching to increase understanding of mental
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at increase understanding of mental, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/11
Source: “Teach to increase understanding of mental, emotional, or behavioural states or disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material on mental health is abundant and produces well, though delivering a session is a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Documenting specimens by verifying patients' and specimens' information
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specimens, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 60 · 2212/09
Source: “Document specimens by verifying patients' and specimens' information.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Matching patient and specimen details is checkable computer work, though someone must handle the sample itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing or monitoring procedures to ensure adequate quality control of images
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at procedures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Develop or monitor procedures to ensure adequate quality control of images.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image quality checks are highly measurable and largely automated, with a specialist setting and reviewing the standards.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing surgery services to ensure efficient operation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at surgery services, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Manage surgery services to ensure efficient operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Theatre lists, capacity and utilisation are scheduling problems software handles well, with managers deciding the trade-offs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising surgeon of a patient's risk status and recommending appropriate intervention to minimise risk
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at surgeon of a patient's risk status, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Advise surgeon of a patient's risk status and recommend appropriate intervention to minimise risk.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A written risk summary for the surgeon drafts well from the notes, but the recommendation is the doctor's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending medicines, vaccinations and specialised medical care for disease or injury
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at medicines, vaccinations and specialised medical care, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 70 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13
Source: “Recommend medicines, vaccinations, and specialised medical care for disease or injury.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recommending treatment is the doctor's clinical decision and leads straight to a prescription only they can write.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending specific medical or therapeutic treatments based on patient diagnoses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specific medical or therapeutic treatments, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/06
Source: “Recommend specific medical or therapeutic treatments based on patient diagnoses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treatment options follow published guidance closely, but recommending one for a patient is a registered doctor's act.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing treatment plans in consultation with the client's treatment team
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at treatment plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 75 · 2212/06, 2212/11
Source: “Develop treatment plans in consultation with the client's treatment team.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A treatment plan drafts well from records and guidance, though it is agreed and owned by the clinical team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Referring patients to specialists in cardiology or neurology when symptoms indicate a need for expert care
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 50 · 2212/07, 2212/14
Source: “Refer patients to specialists in cardiology or neurology when symptoms indicate a need for expert care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Referral criteria are published and referral letters draft well, but the referral itself must come from a registered clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing specialist care programmes for children and adolescents
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at specialist care programmes, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/10
Source: “Develop specialist care programmes for children and adolescents.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Care programmes draft well from guidance and records, though a consultant must adopt them for the child.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing patients' symptoms and referring to specialist consultants
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients' symptoms, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/10
Source: “Diagnose patients' symptoms and refer to specialist consultants if needed.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Diagnostic support is strong, but the diagnosis and onward referral must come from the registered doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing personalised treatment plans based on patient assessments
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at personalised treatment plans, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Develop personalised treatment plans based on patient assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Care plans draft well from assessments and guidance, though only the responsible clinician can adopt one.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing risk by reviewing background information
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at risk, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 90 · 2212/11
Source: “Assess risk by reviewing background information, reports, and medical records.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Risk assessment from records and reports is document work, though the conclusion carries the clinician's legal responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising on clinical indications of radioactive materials in diagnostics
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at clinical indications of radioactive materials, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Advise on clinical indications of radioactive materials in diagnostics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Guidance on when tracers are appropriate is well published, though the clinical advice comes from a registered specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing physiotherapy to relax the muscles and improving strength
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at physiotherapy, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Prescribe physiotherapy to relax the muscles and improve strength.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Referral for physiotherapy follows well-published criteria, though the prescription comes from a registered clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Deciding on the best care practices
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the best care practices, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Decide on the best care practices for patients before, during, and after surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Best practice around surgery is set out in published guidance, but the decisions belong to the responsible surgeon.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing patients with information and instructions about their care
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/01
Source: “Provide patients with information and instructions about their care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Care instructions are standard and easy to produce, but patients want them from their doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating athlete's foot
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for athlete's foot, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/03
Source: “Treat athlete's foot.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (35–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Athlete's foot is a common, thoroughly documented condition with standard treatments, mostly available over the counter.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Devising a shared treatment plan with patients for delivery via face-to-face
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a shared treatment plan, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/07
Source: “Devise a shared treatment plan with patients for delivery via face-to-face, online, or telephone methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A shared plan drafts well from the consultation, but agreeing it with the patient is a conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising patients on rehabilitation exercises for long-term recovery
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Advise patients on rehabilitation exercises for long-term recovery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Exercise advice is well documented and drafts easily, but patients follow it because their doctor gave it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Planning for community reintegration in rehabilitation strategies
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for community reintegration, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/13
Source: “Plan for community reintegration in rehabilitation strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Community reintegration plans draw on documented services and options, but the plan is agreed with the patient and family.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing students and staff of signs of complications
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles students and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2212/01
Source: “Inform students and staff of signs of complications.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (34–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Warning signs are thoroughly documented, so clear teaching material is easy to produce for students and staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Undertaking research to advance knowledge in specific fields
staying human
The ratings behind this row put research well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2212/11
Source: “Undertake research to advance knowledge in specific fields.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Analysis and writing suit software well, but original research needs someone running the studies.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Teaching nuclear medicine at the postgraduate educational level
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles nuclear medicine and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/12
Source: “Teach nuclear medicine at the postgraduate educational level.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Postgraduate teaching material is abundant and produces well, though the lecture itself is delivered by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing and evaluating treatment procedures and outcomes of other psychiatrists or medical professionals
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment procedures, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/11
Source: “Review and evaluate treatment procedures and outcomes of other psychiatrists or medical professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reviewing colleagues’ treatment decisions needs a qualified peer, though tools can prepare the case summaries.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using a holistic approach to advise patients on diet
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a holistic approach and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 85 · 2212/07
Source: “Use a holistic approach to advise patients on diet, exercise, lifestyle and emotional wellbeing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Diet and lifestyle advice is well documented, but holistic consultations work because a client trusts the person giving them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing guidance on maintaining mental health through personalised strategies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles guidance and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2212/07
Source: “Provide guidance on maintaining mental health through personalised strategies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Self-help strategies are widely published, but people follow mental health advice from someone they have come to trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using diagnostic tests to determine patient risk during surgical
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for diagnostic tests, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/01
Source: “Use diagnostic tests to determine patient risk during surgical, obstetrical, and other medical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Turning test results into a risk figure is well-documented number work, though the anaesthetist owns the conclusion.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating activities of medical specialists and therapists
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles activities of medical specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/09, 2212/10, 2212/13
Source: “Coordinate activities of medical specialists and therapists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating a patient's team is scheduling plus persuasion between busy clinicians.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing patients and their clinical requirements to determine appropriate radiographic techniques
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/12
Source: “Assess patients and their clinical requirements to determine appropriate radiographic techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Choosing the right imaging technique follows published protocols, but the exposure must be justified by a registered practitioner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing areas with high risk of error to improve safety measures
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles areas and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Discuss areas with high risk of error to improve safety measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Safety analysis and improvement plans draft well from incident data, but the discussion that changes behaviour involves the team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating activities of medical specialists and junior doctors
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles activities of medical specialists and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Coordinate activities of medical specialists and junior doctors.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Rotas and allocations are handled well by software, though directing senior colleagues depends on standing among them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Logging patients' medical information and vital signs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients' medical information, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/03
Source: “Log patients' medical information and vital signs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Recording is easy for software, but the readings have to be taken from the patient in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating chronic health conditions like high blood pressure and diabetes
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for chronic health conditions like high blood pressure, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Treat chronic health conditions like high blood pressure and diabetes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Blood pressure and diabetes care follows tightly protocolised national guidance, though prescribing and review stay with the clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Treating infections, flu, pneumonia and chronic conditions in adolescents, adults and the elderly
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for infections, flu, pneumonia and chronic conditions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/04, 2212/13
Source: “Treat infections, flu, pneumonia, and chronic conditions in adolescents, adults, and the elderly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 33 out of 100 (26–40 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Common infections and long-term conditions follow well-published treatment rules, but the prescription must come from a registered clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Advising on ways to manage pain during labour
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for ways, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/01
Source: “Advise on ways to manage pain during labour.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Options for labour pain are thoroughly documented and explain well in writing, but reassurance in the moment comes from a midwife or doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Prescribing medication to treat a range of cardiac illnesses
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medication, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/02
Source: “Prescribe medication to treat a range of cardiac illnesses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Standard heart drug choices follow published guidance closely, but only a registered prescriber may issue the prescription.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing hormonal agents or topical treatments
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for hormonal agents, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/03
Source: “Prescribe hormonal agents or topical treatments such as contraceptives, spironolactone, antiandrogens, oral corticosteroids, retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, or antibiotics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Standard skin treatments follow well-published prescribing rules, but only a registered prescriber can issue them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing medications to treat various health conditions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medications, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/10
Source: “Prescribe medications to treat various health conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (28–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Only a registered prescriber may issue a prescription in the UK, so software can suggest but never sign.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing necessary medication based on patient assessments
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for necessary medication, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Prescribe necessary medication based on patient assessments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (28–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Only a registered prescriber may sign a prescription in the UK, whatever a system recommends.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining a final diagnosis by consulting with a pathologist when abnormal cells are found
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a final diagnosis, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/09
Source: “Determine a final diagnosis by consulting with a pathologist when abnormal cells are found.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Abnormal findings can be summarised for discussion, but the final diagnosis is a registered pathologist's.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analysing and evaluating patient data or testing findings to diagnose the nature or extent of mental disorders
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patient data, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Analyse and evaluate patient data or test findings to diagnose the nature or extent of mental disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Records and scores can be analysed at a screen, but the diagnosis is a registered psychiatrist's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing treatment plans for radiology patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Develop treatment plans for radiology patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treatment plans can be drafted, but the plan is legally the responsibility of a licensed physician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining the need for medical intervention
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for this work, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Determine the need for medical intervention, such as surgery, based on diagnoses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Guidance sets out when surgery is indicated, but deciding to operate on someone is a consultant's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with cardiologists to assess the necessity of surgery
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for cardiologists, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Consult with cardiologists to assess the necessity of surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Written summaries help, but deciding with a cardiologist whether surgery is safe is a judgement between two doctors.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering specialised advice to colleagues in different areas of expertise
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for specialised advice, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 60 · 2212/02
Source: “Offer specialised advice to colleagues in different areas of expertise.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written specialist opinions draft well, but colleagues ask because they want a named expert's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering specialist expertise and guidance to other doctors and staff from a range of medical specialties
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for specialist expertise, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/08, 2212/10, 2212/12
Source: “Offer specialist expertise and guidance to other doctors and staff from a range of medical specialties.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written opinions draft well, but colleagues ask a named specialist precisely because they want that person's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Engaging in continuous professional development to maintain or improve knowledge and skills
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for continuous professional development, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/08, 2212/12
Source: “Engage in continuous professional development to maintain or improve knowledge and skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping registration means the doctor must genuinely do the learning; tools only help find and summarise material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Attending continuing education programmes to address and resolve laboratory issues
staying human
The ratings behind this row put education programmes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 60 · 2212/09
Source: “Attend continuing education programmes to address and resolve laboratory issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy to produce, but attending courses and applying what you learn is something a person does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Taking continuing education classes
staying human
The ratings behind this row put education classes well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 80 · 2212/11
Source: “Take continuing education classes related to mental, emotional, or behavioural states or disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Course content is easy to produce, but attending training and keeping registration is something a person does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conferring with medical professionals regarding image-based diagnoses
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medical professionals regarding image-based diagnoses, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Confer with medical professionals regarding image-based diagnoses.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Findings summarise well in writing, but agreeing a diagnosis with colleagues is a discussion between specialists.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting on cases to multidisciplinary team meetings
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for cases, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Report on cases to multidisciplinary team meetings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Case summaries prepare well, but presenting to a team meeting and answering challenges is a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing characteristics of patients' pain using standardised clinical measures
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for characteristics of patients' pain, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/13
Source: “Assess characteristics of patients' pain using standardised clinical measures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Pain scoring uses published standard measures that are easy to apply, though the conversation happens with the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Educating family members or carers on patient care
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles members and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Educate family members or carers on patient care as appropriate.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Care instructions write very clearly, but carers take them in when a clinician shows them and answers worries.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Monitoring effectiveness of medication for pain management
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for effectiveness of medication, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Monitor effectiveness of medication for pain management.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pain scores and prescribing data track well, but changing pain medication is a registered clinician's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting post-anaesthesia medicines or treatments for patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for post-anaesthesia medicines, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Select post-anaesthesia medicines or treatments for patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Suitable painkillers can be suggested from guidance, but only a registered prescriber may actually order them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting research findings at professional scientific conferences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: research findings, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Present research findings at professional scientific conferences.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides and abstracts produce very well, but presenting at a conference and taking questions is a person standing up.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Explaining the risks and side effects of anaesthesia
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the risks, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/01
Source: “Explain the risks and side effects of anaesthesia.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: The risks are well documented and explain clearly on paper, but a worried patient wants a doctor answering their questions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interviewing patients to obtain their medical histories
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles patients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2212/02
Source: “Interview patients to obtain their medical histories.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: History questionnaires and chatbots already collect this well, though the consultant checks and interprets the answers.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing and administering healthcare programmes
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles healthcare programmes and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2212/04, 2212/05
Source: “Implement and administer healthcare programmes, including personnel administration and staff training.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a programme means organising people and services, helped by documented methods but driven by the person in charge.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in postgraduate education for professional development
staying human
The ratings behind this row put postgraduate education well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 70 · 2212/07
Source: “Participate in postgraduate education for professional development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Course material is easy to produce, but attending training and gaining the qualification is something a person does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Managing a research team, including technicians and supporting staff, to conduct studies
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a research team, including technicians and supporting staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Manage a research team, including technicians and support staff, to conduct studies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Project plans and reporting draft well, but leading technicians and researchers through a study is people management.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing patients and their families about mental health and medical conditions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/11
Source: “Inform patients and their families about mental health and medical conditions, preventative health measures, medicines, or treatment plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Clear explanations of conditions and medicines write very well, but families want them from the clinician involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Obtaining complete medical and surgical histories from patients
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles complete medical and surgical histories and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Obtain complete medical and surgical histories from patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Structured history-taking can be done by questionnaire or chatbot, though the consultant confirms and interprets it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Integrating physical medicine and rehabilitation services with other medical departments to enhance patient care
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles physical medicine and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/13
Source: “Integrate physical medicine and rehabilitation services with other medical departments to enhance patient care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Pathways and referral routes draft well, but joining up hospital departments depends on relationships between the teams.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating the biochemistry of blood clotting
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the biochemistry of blood, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/06
Source: “Investigate the biochemistry of blood clotting.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: The science is well published and analysis suits software, but laboratory experiments need someone at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research to improve understanding of blood-related diseases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/06
Source: “Conduct research to improve understanding of blood-related diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Literature work and data analysis are strong areas, but laboratory research still needs people running experiments.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting neuroscience research and publishing findings in academic journals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: neuroscience research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Conduct neuroscience research and publish findings in academic journals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Drafting and analysis are strong areas, but neuroscience research means running experiments and defending them in peer review.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Determining appropriate therapy or counselling treatments for patients based on their conditions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for appropriate therapy, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Determine appropriate therapy or counselling treatments for patients based on their conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Treatment options are documented, but matching a therapy to a person depends on knowing them clinically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing treatment regularly to ensure patient progress and adjust care plans
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/11
Source: “Review treatment regularly to ensure patient progress and adjust care plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress data can be reviewed at a screen, but changing a care plan is a clinical decision made with the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting with other medical professionals to determine type and method of anaesthetic or sedation to render patient insensible
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for other medical professionals, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2212/01
Source: “Consult with other medical professionals to determine type and method of anaesthetic or sedation to render patient insensible to pain.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Guidelines suggest suitable anaesthetic options, but the choice is a registered anaesthetist's call made with the surgical team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and documenting patients' progress during post-anaesthetic period
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients' progress during post-anaesthetic period, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Monitor and document patients' progress during post-anaesthetic period.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Writing up recovery progress is straightforward, but noticing a patient waking badly needs someone watching them in recovery.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating chronic pain management services for patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for chronic pain management services, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/01
Source: “Coordinate chronic pain management services for patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Appointments and care pathways can be organised by software, but holding a pain service together relies on the clinicians involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in multidisciplinary meetings to review patient treatment plans and referrals
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for multidisciplinary meetings, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 65 · 2212/01
Source: “Participate in multidisciplinary meetings to review patient treatment plans and referrals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Case summaries for the meeting prepare well, yet the value comes from specialists arguing a plan through together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Employing preventive methods to reduce heart-related problems
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for preventive methods, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Employ preventive methods to reduce heart-related problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Prevention advice is well documented, yet getting patients to change how they live depends on the clinician they see.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing patients' treatment plans with doctors and other medical professionals
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients' treatment plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/02, 2212/11
Source: “Discuss patients' treatment plans with doctors and other medical professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Case summaries prepare well, but agreeing a plan with other doctors is a back-and-forth between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining treatment plans
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/02
Source: “Explain treatment plans to patients, using reports and examination results.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Turning reports into plain language is a real strength, but patients want the explanation from the doctor treating them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing treatment plans for common and complex health issues in adolescents
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Oversee treatment plans for common and complex health issues in adolescents, adults, and the elderly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Plans can be drafted from guidance, but overseeing treatment for complex patients is a consultant's continuing responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating test results
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for test results, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/08, 2212/12
Source: “Communicate test results to patients, doctors, and family members.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Results explain clearly in writing, but hearing serious news is something patients and families want from a doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating with hospital staff to maintain quality treatment standards
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for hospital staff, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/08, 2212/10, 2212/12
Source: “Coordinate with hospital staff to maintain quality treatment standards.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Standards documents draft well, but keeping quality up across a hospital depends on working with the staff involved.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Speaking with colleagues to share knowledge in the field
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles colleagues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Speak with colleagues to share knowledge in the field.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Sharing knowledge with colleagues happens in conversation and depends on being a trusted peer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Addressing security concerns in the use of radioactive materials
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for security concerns, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Address security concerns in the use of radioactive materials.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Written security procedures draft well, but radioactive material rules carry personal legal duties and need checking on site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing specific orthotics, prosthetics and adaptive equipment to aid patient mobility and daily activities
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for specific orthotics, prosthetics and adaptive equipment, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/13
Source: “Prescribe specific orthotics, prosthetics, and adaptive equipment to aid patient mobility and daily activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Equipment options are documented, but choosing and fitting an aid depends on assessing the individual patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing treatment and procedures with patients and/or parents and guardians
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Discuss treatment and procedures with patients and/or parents and guardians.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explanations write clearly, but families discuss an operation with the surgeon who will carry it out.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Informing parents and guardians about a child's health issues and surgical procedures through direct and telecommunication methods
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for parents, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Inform parents and guardians about a child's health issues and surgical procedures through direct and telecommunication methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written and phone updates draft well, but parents want the news about their child from the doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing or testing medications, treatments or procedures to prevent or control disease or injury
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medications, treatments or procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/02, 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Develop or test medications, treatments, or procedures to prevent or control disease or injury.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Designing and analysing trials suits these tools well, though testing anything on patients needs clinicians and laboratories.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting clinical or basic research to improve dermatological care and therapies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clinical, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/03
Source: “Conduct clinical or basic research to improve dermatological care and therapies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Study design and analysis are strong areas, but laboratory and patient research still needs people doing the work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying tissue structures or cell components for use in disease diagnosis
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tissue structures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/06
Source: “Identify tissue structures or cell components for use in disease diagnosis, prevention, or treatment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image recognition identifies tissue structures well, but the work happens down a microscope with the specimen in place.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Researching and developing new treatments for neurological disorders
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: new treatments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/08
Source: “Research and develop new treatments for neurological disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Literature work and analysis suit these tools well, but developing treatments needs laboratories and clinical trials.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inspecting specimens to identify abnormal hormone conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specimens, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/09
Source: “Inspect specimens to identify abnormal hormone conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Hormone results interpret well from published reference ranges, but inspecting specimens is laboratory work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing educational support to junior staff for skill development
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles educational support and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/02
Source: “Provide educational support to junior staff for skill development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Learning material is easy to produce, but developing a junior clinician's skill depends on a working relationship.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out follow-up meetings to monitor and evaluate patient progress
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles follow-up meetings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2212/07
Source: “Carry out follow-up meetings to monitor and evaluate patient progress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress can be tracked on paper, but follow-up sessions work through the relationship between client and practitioner.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adjusting communication styles when interacting with healthcare professionals and patients
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles communication styles and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/07
Source: “Adjust communication styles when interacting with healthcare professionals and patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reading the room and adjusting how you speak to a frightened patient is judgement built in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Attending weekly academic meetings with neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists for learning and case discussions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles academic meetings and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 65 · 2212/08
Source: “Attend weekly academic meetings with neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists for learning and case discussions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Case discussion meetings work because specialists argue cases through together and learn from each other.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining surgical procedures and associated risks to patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for surgical procedures, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Explain surgical procedures and associated risks to patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Risk information writes very clearly, but consent for an operation is taken by the surgeon in conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Training cardiology students
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cardiology students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2212/02
Source: “Train cardiology students.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Course content and question banks produce well, but clinical teaching happens beside students with real patients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Conducting seminars for community groups on homeopathy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: seminars, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/07
Source: “Conduct seminars for community groups on homeopathy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Seminar slides and handouts produce easily, but standing in front of a community group is a person's job.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assigning or delegating responsibilities to department heads or managers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles responsibilities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 50 · 2212/10
Source: “Assign or delegate responsibilities to department heads or managers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Delegating work is a leadership act between people, resting on judgement about who can take it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Prescribing psychotherapeutic treatments to treat mental
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for psychotherapeutic treatments, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Prescribe psychotherapeutic treatments to treat mental, emotional, or behavioural disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Therapy choices follow published guidance, but only a registered prescriber can order psychiatric treatment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Suggesting surgical interventions when necessary for patient care
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for surgical interventions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 50 · 2212/01, 2212/10
Source: “Suggest surgical interventions when necessary for patient care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Surgical options can be listed from guidelines, but recommending an operation for a particular patient is a consultant's judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Enforcing standards for the protection of personnel
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for standards, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Enforce standards for the protection of personnel.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written rules are easy to produce, but enforcing radiation safety means checking what staff actually do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing ongoing support and advice to patients under long-term care
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for support, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/02
Source: “Provide ongoing support and advice to patients under long-term care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Advice can be drafted and sent remotely, but long-term patients rely on a clinician who knows them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting clinical research focused on specific areas of medical interest
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clinical research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/02
Source: “Conduct clinical research focused on specific areas of medical interest.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Protocols, analysis and write-up are strong areas for software, but running a study means working with real patients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing and maintaining a safe practice environment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: a safe practice environment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/07
Source: “Establish and maintain a safe practice environment, maintaining confidentiality and records appropriately.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping a clinical environment safe mixes written procedure with physically checking the place and the people in it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising guardians on patients' conditions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for guardians, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/11
Source: “Advise guardians on patients' conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Information writes clearly, but families take difficult news about a relative from a clinician they trust.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying complications during and after radiological procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: complications, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Identify complications during and after radiological procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Complication signs are documented, but spotting one during a procedure means being there with the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing musculoskeletal disorders to plan surgical interventions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: musculoskeletal disorders, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Diagnose musculoskeletal disorders to plan surgical interventions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Scan reading is strong, but planning an operation depends on examining how the joint behaves in the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Delivering training sessions to staff to improve their expertise
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles sessions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 60 · 2212/02
Source: “Deliver training sessions to staff to improve their expertise.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Materials are easy to produce, but running a session depends on a person holding the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing and treating acne
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: acne, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/03
Source: “Diagnose and treat acne.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Acne is exceptionally well documented and photographs help, but examining skin and prescribing stay with the doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Serving on committees to promote or maintain community mental health services or delivery systems
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles committees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/11
Source: “Serve on committees to promote or maintain community mental health services or delivery systems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 17 out of 100 (10–24 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Committee work is people negotiating priorities and services with each other over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating within a multidisciplinary team to achieve common goals
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles within a multidisciplinary team and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 70 · 2212/02
Source: “Collaborate within a multidisciplinary team to achieve common goals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Team working depends on live discussion and trust between clinicians who each carry responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Prescribing or administering therapy and medication to treat or prevent illness
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: therapy, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/04, 2212/05, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Prescribe or administer therapy and medication to treat or prevent illness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (12–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Prescribing is restricted to registered prescribers, and giving the treatment needs hands on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working to a high legal and ethical standard at all times
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for a high legal, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 80 · 2212/07
Source: “Work to a high legal and ethical standard at all times, particularly in relation to issues such as child safeguarding and health and safety requirements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Safeguarding duties sit personally with the registered practitioner, who must notice concerns and act on them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing medical students and residents in paediatric care and treatment methods
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/10
Source: “Instruct medical students and residents in paediatric care and treatment methods.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material is abundant, but students learn paediatrics beside a consultant with real children in front of them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Assessing whether a patient is fit enough to undertake an operation before surgery takes place
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: whether a patient is fit enough, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Assess whether a patient is fit enough to undertake an operation before surgery takes place.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Fitness scoring follows published rules, yet the decision rests on examining the patient and carries the doctor's legal responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring patient progress following cardiac surgery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patient progress following cardiac surgery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/02
Source: “Monitor patient progress following cardiac surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recovery data can be tracked automatically, but judging how a post-surgical patient is really doing needs seeing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing acute health conditions like illnesses and infections
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: acute health conditions like illnesses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/04, 2212/13
Source: “Diagnose acute health conditions like illnesses and infections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Common infections follow well-documented patterns, but diagnosis usually rests on examining the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing nonsurgical treatment for diseases to adult patients in a surgery or hospital
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: nonsurgical treatment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/04, 2212/06, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Provide nonsurgical treatment for diseases to adult patients in a surgery or hospital.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Non-surgical treatment still means seeing patients, examining them and prescribing under a doctor's registration.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising histology laboratory activities
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: histology laboratory activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2212/06
Source: “Supervise histology laboratory activities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Rotas and quality records can be handled by software, but running a laboratory means being there when things go wrong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing complex neurological problems by analysing patient history
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: complex neurological problems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/08
Source: “Diagnose complex neurological problems by analysing patient history, conducting examinations, and using neurological tests.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Symptom patterns are well documented, but neurological diagnosis rests heavily on examining the patient yourself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting clinical trials for medicine testing
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clinical trials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Conduct clinical trials for medicine testing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Trial paperwork and analysis suit software well, but running a trial means dosing and monitoring real patients under a licensed investigator.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring patients for behavioural and cognitive side effects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Monitor patients for behavioural and cognitive side effects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Side effect checklists are documented, but noticing that a patient has changed usually means seeing them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing outpatient clinics to diagnose and manage neurological or rheumatological conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: outpatient clinics, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Oversee outpatient clinics to diagnose and manage neurological or rheumatological conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Clinics can be organised by software, but diagnosing and managing patients in them means examining people face to face.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Explaining treatment and procedures to enable parents/carers to consent to treatment
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for treatment, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 85 · 2212/10
Source: “Explain treatment and procedures to enable parents/carers to consent to treatment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written explanations help, but parents give consent after talking it through with the doctor who will operate.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using medical imaging
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/12
Source: “Use medical imaging to diagnose, treat, and manage various conditions and diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image reading software is genuinely strong, but using imaging to manage patients involves scanning and treating them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring handling of radioactive materials to ensure adherence to established procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radioactive materials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Monitor handling of radioactive materials to ensure adherence to established procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Records can be checked automatically, but watching how radioactive material is actually handled means being in the department.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training nuclear medicine technologists in specialised procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: nuclear medicine technologists, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Train nuclear medicine technologists in specialised procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Course material produces well, but technologists learn specialised scanning by doing it beside an experienced colleague.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing performance-related joint conditions to improve athlete mobility and function
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: performance-related joint conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Diagnose performance-related joint conditions to improve athlete mobility and function.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Sports injury patterns are documented, but diagnosis rests on examining how the joint actually moves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing inpatient medical treatment for neuromuscular disorders and musculoskeletal trauma
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: inpatient medical treatment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Manage inpatient medical treatment for neuromuscular disorders and musculoskeletal trauma.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Inpatient management follows published pathways, but caring for injured patients means being on the ward with them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing client rehabilitation programmes in collaboration with healthcare professionals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: client rehabilitation programmes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/13
Source: “Implement client rehabilitation programmes in collaboration with healthcare professionals.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Programme plans draft well, but putting a rehabilitation programme into practice happens with the patient and the therapy team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring patients' progress post-surgery to assess recovery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients' progress post-surgery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Monitor patients' progress post-surgery to assess recovery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recovery data can be tracked, but checking how a patient is healing after surgery means looking at them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing bodily disorders in clinical settings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: disorders, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Diagnose bodily disorders in clinical settings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Common conditions follow documented patterns, but diagnosis normally means examining the patient in clinic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating problems affecting the oral mucosa
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: problems affecting the oral mucosa, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/14
Source: “Treat problems affecting the oral mucosa, like mouth ulcers and infections.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Mouth conditions are well documented, but examining and treating the mouth is done with the patient in the chair.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training junior staff in critical care and anaesthesia
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: junior staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/01
Source: “Train junior staff in critical care and anaesthesia.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching materials and simulations help, but critical care skills are learned beside a trainer at a real patient's bedside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing interns or residents in diagnosis and treatment of dermatological diseases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: interns, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/03, 2212/13
Source: “Instruct interns or residents in diagnosis and treatment of dermatological diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material is abundant and easy to produce, but trainees learn dermatology looking at real skin alongside a consultant.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training junior doctors in specialised medical practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: junior doctors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/10
Source: “Train junior doctors in specialised medical practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training resources produce well, but specialist practice is learned by doing it alongside an experienced doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing preoperative treatments, including sedatives and antibiotics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: preoperative treatments, including sedatives and antibiotics, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Manage preoperative treatments, including sedatives and antibiotics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 14 out of 100 (7–21 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pre-operative drug protocols are documented, but prescribing and giving them are acts reserved to registered staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing patient to obtain information on medical condition and surgical risk
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patient, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/01, 2212/14
Source: “Assess patient to obtain information on medical condition and surgical risk.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: History-taking and risk scoring are structured, but sizing up whether someone can withstand surgery involves examining them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating and directing work of other healthcare providers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: work of other healthcare providers, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/01
Source: “Coordinate and direct work of other healthcare providers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Work can be allocated by software, but directing other clinicians in a live service depends on being there and being trusted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing patients to determine suitability for cosmetic procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/03
Source: “Assess patients to determine suitability for cosmetic procedures such as liposuction, laser resurfacing, or microdermabrasion.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Suitability guidance exists, but judging whether someone should have a cosmetic procedure means examining them and discussing expectations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing rare diseases in outpatient settings
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: rare diseases, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Diagnose rare diseases in outpatient settings.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Rare disease pattern-matching is a genuine strength, but the diagnosis follows examining the patient and carries the consultant's name.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Treating children with minor illnesses
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: children, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/10
Source: “Treat children with minor illnesses, health problems, and growth concerns.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Minor childhood illness follows well-documented patterns, but treating a child means seeing them and reassuring the parents.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Collaborating with doctors across specialties as part of a multidisciplinary team
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for doctors across specialties, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/10
Source: “Collaborate with doctors across specialties as part of a multidisciplinary team.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Multidisciplinary working is specialists talking a case through and reaching a shared view.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses and social workers in a mental health team
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses and social workers, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 90 · 2212/11
Source: “Collaborate with psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and social workers in a mental health team.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Team working in mental health is professionals sharing what they each see and agreeing an approach.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing the patient care activities of nursing staff
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the patient care activities of nursing staff, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 75 · 2212/14
Source: “Direct the patient care activities of nursing staff.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing nursing care is live supervision by the doctor responsible for those patients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Reassuring patients about medical procedures and interventions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles patients and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 80 · 2212/01, 2212/14
Source: “Reassure patients about medical procedures and interventions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reassurance works because it comes from the doctor treating you, in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing and testing new neurological techniques to enhance patient care
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: new neurological techniques, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/08
Source: “Develop and test new neurological techniques to enhance patient care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Inventing and trialling new clinical techniques needs practitioners doing them on real patients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Prescribing or administering anti-epileptic drugs
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: anti-epileptic drugs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/08
Source: “Prescribe or administer anti-epileptic drugs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Drug choice follows published epilepsy guidance, but prescribing and giving the medicine are acts reserved to registered staff.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training junior members of staff to enhance their skills and performance
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles junior members of staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 75 · 2212/08, 2212/12
Source: “Train junior members of staff to enhance their skills and performance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training juniors happens through watching, correcting and encouraging real people at work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising and teaching junior medical staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: junior medical staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/10, 2212/11
Source: “Supervise and teach junior medical staff, depending on the post.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Written feedback and teaching notes help, but supervising junior doctors is a trust relationship built in the workplace.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing counselling and cognitive retraining for rehabilitation
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for cognitive, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 70 · 2212/13
Source: “Provide counselling and cognitive retraining for rehabilitation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Cognitive rehabilitation works through repeated sessions with someone the patient trusts and responds to.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research to develop surgical techniques for better operating procedures and outcomes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: research, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/14
Source: “Conduct research to develop surgical techniques for better operating procedures and outcomes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Better operating techniques are worked out by surgeons trying them, and little of that knowledge is written down first.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Analysing blood samples using computer-aided and manual techniques
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: blood samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/06
Source: “Analyse blood samples using computer-aided and manual techniques.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Analysers handle much of the counting, but preparing and running blood samples is bench work in a laboratory.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining cell samples to detect abnormalities in the colour
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cell samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/09
Source: “Examine cell samples to detect abnormalities in the colour, shape, or size of cellular components.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image software spots abnormal cells well, but the examination happens at a microscope with the slide in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing experiments using mass spectrometers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: experiments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2212/06
Source: “Perform experiments using mass spectrometers.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Mass spectrometry means preparing samples and operating the instrument in the laboratory.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing or administering treatment and therapy for infants and children
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: treatment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/10
Source: “Prescribe or administer treatment and therapy for infants and children.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Children's dosing follows published tables, but prescribing and giving medicines are acts reserved to registered clinicians.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering psychiatric assessments to evaluate mental health conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: psychiatric assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Administer psychiatric assessments to evaluate mental health conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Assessment tools are published, but a psychiatric assessment depends on how someone speaks and behaves with the clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Working with a variety of other health professionals
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: a variety of other health professionals, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Work with a variety of other health professionals, such as surgeons, operating department practitioners, theatre nurses, radiographers and radiologists, to ensure patient wellbeing.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working alongside surgeons, theatre nurses and radiographers is give-and-take between people in the same room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing patients' readiness to be moved to a ward post-operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients' readiness, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/01
Source: “Assess patients' readiness to be moved to a ward post-operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recovery scoring uses set criteria, but deciding someone is safe to leave recovery needs eyes on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Being at the forefront of trialling breakthrough treatments and medication developed by pioneering research
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the forefront of trialling breakthrough treatments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/02
Source: “Be at the forefront of trialling breakthrough treatments and medication developed by pioneering research.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Trying brand-new treatments on patients means a licensed doctor giving them, with very little prior evidence to draw on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising cardiology technologists
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cardiology technologists, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/02
Source: “Supervise cardiology technologists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising technologists means being around while they scan patients and stepping in when something looks wrong.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training radiologic staff in specific imaging techniques and patient positioning
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radiologic staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Train radiologic staff in specific imaging techniques and patient positioning.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Positioning technique is learned hands-on with a real patient, however good the written guidance is.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing somatosensory evoked potentials to diagnose neuromuscular disorders
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: somatosensory evoked potentials, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Assess somatosensory evoked potentials to diagnose neuromuscular disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The waveform analysis is computable, but running the test means attaching electrodes to a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing ultrasound display screen and listening to signals to record vascular information
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: ultrasound display screen, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/02
Source: “Observe ultrasound display screen and listen to signals to record vascular information such as blood pressure, limb volume changes, oxygen saturation, and cerebral circulation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Capturing blood flow signals means holding the probe and listening while the patient lies there.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing and treating moles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: moles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/03
Source: “Diagnose and treat moles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image tools spot suspicious moles well, but examining and removing them is hands-on skin work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining biological specimens under a microscope
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: biological specimens under a microscope, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/06, 2212/09
Source: “Examine biological specimens under a microscope.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Image software reads slides well, but the work still means sitting at a microscope with the specimen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Using fMRI techniques to observe brain activity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fmri techniques, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Use fMRI techniques to observe brain activity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Running a brain scan means positioning the patient and operating the scanner, even though the data analysis is computable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting routine laboratory tests on fluid and tissue samples
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: routine laboratory tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/09
Source: “Conduct routine laboratory tests on fluid and tissue samples, including cervical smear tests, to detect abnormalities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Routine laboratory testing means handling samples and running machines at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Adhering to standards of specimen collection to maintain effective laboratory operations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: standards of specimen collection, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/09
Source: “Adhere to standards of specimen collection to maintain effective laboratory operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Following collection standards means physically handling specimens correctly at the point they are taken.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising medical students during clinical placements
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical students during clinical placements, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Supervise medical students during clinical placements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising students on placement means being present, watching what they do and building their confidence.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Offering therapy and treatments for issues relating to a range of mental health conditions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for therapy, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Offer therapy and treatments for issues relating to a range of mental health conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 8 out of 100 (1–15 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Therapy works through the relationship between patient and therapist, which is the whole point of it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out initial consultations on a one-to-one basis with patients to assess their health and get a detailed case history from them
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: initial consultations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/07
Source: “Carry out initial consultations on a one-to-one basis with patients to assess their health and get a detailed case history from them.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A first consultation happens in the room with the patient, and the assessment is the consultant's own.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Applying specialised treatments in behavioural neurology
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specialised treatments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/08
Source: “Apply specialised treatments in behavioural neurology.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Behavioural neurology treatment depends on working directly with the patient over time, guided by little documented protocol.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting instruments, equipment and operating theatres to ensure sterility
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: instruments, equipment and operating theatres, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Inspect instruments, equipment, and operating theatres to ensure sterility.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Checking instruments and theatres means physically looking at them before the list starts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing echocardiography using ultrasound to diagnose heart diseases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: echocardiography, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Perform echocardiography using ultrasound to diagnose heart diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reading the images is increasingly automated, but capturing a good scan means holding the probe on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing antenatal care to patients to monitor foetal development and maternal health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: antenatal care, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/05
Source: “Provide antenatal care to patients to monitor foetal development and maternal health.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Antenatal care means measuring, scanning and examining a pregnant woman in person over many months.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Crossmatching blood for transfusions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: blood, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/06
Source: “Cross-match blood for transfusions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Matching blood for transfusion is tightly regulated bench work with samples physically in front of the scientist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing blood tests to diagnose and treat blood disorders
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: blood tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/06
Source: “Perform blood tests to diagnose and treat blood disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Blood testing means handling samples and running machines, even though the numbers themselves are easy to interpret.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting health reviews to assess children's growth and development
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: health reviews, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/10
Source: “Conduct health reviews to assess children's growth and development.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Growth charts and milestone checks are highly structured, but the review means measuring and watching the child.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the risk patients pose to themselves
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the risk patients pose, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/11
Source: “Assess the risk patients pose to themselves and others.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Judging whether someone is a danger to themselves rests on clinical instinct built face to face.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Diagnosing and treating a range of heart-related problems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: a range of heart-related problems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/02
Source: “Diagnose and treat a range of heart-related problems.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Heart problems are diagnosed and treated through examination, scans and procedures done with the patient present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating problems of the lung
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: problems of the lung, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/13
Source: “Treat problems of the lung, brain, kidney, or gastrointestinal tract.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treating organ disease involves examining patients, procedures and prescribing, all done by a registered doctor in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating acute conditions, such as a stroke
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: acute conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/08
Source: “Treat acute conditions, such as a stroke.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Stroke treatment is time-critical hands-on care, with scanning, drugs and procedures done at the patient's side.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing specialised treatments for sleep disorders
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: specialised treatments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Perform specialised treatments for sleep disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Sleep disorder treatment involves studies, equipment and procedures carried out with the patient present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing routine medical investigations to diagnose and monitor children's health conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: routine medical investigations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/10
Source: “Perform routine medical investigations to diagnose and monitor children's health conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Routine investigations in children mean examining, measuring and taking samples from a small patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing patients to evaluate their health condition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/10, 2212/11
Source: “Assess patients to evaluate their health condition.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assessing someone's health rests on examining them, which cannot be done through a screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing and treating anaesthetic-related illnesses and diseases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: anaesthetic-related illnesses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/01
Source: “Diagnose and treat anaesthetic-related illnesses and diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Spotting and treating problems caused by anaesthesia depends on examining the patient and acting on them physically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising staff in anaesthesia practices
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: staff, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/01
Source: “Supervise staff in anaesthesia practices.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising anaesthetic practice means being present in theatre, ready to step in when a trainee runs into trouble.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Examining patients to assess their current condition and health
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/02, 2212/10, 2212/12
Source: “Examine patients to assess their current condition and health.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Examining a patient means looking at, listening to and feeling them, which no software can do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising medical technicians during neurological diagnostic or therapeutic procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical technicians during neurological diagnostic, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/08
Source: “Supervise medical technicians during neurological diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Supervising a procedure means being in the room, watching the patient and stepping in when needed.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting regular ward rounds
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: regular ward rounds, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/08, 2212/14
Source: “Conduct regular ward rounds.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A ward round means walking the ward, looking at patients and making decisions at their bedside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assessing the condition of children who are ill
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the condition of children who are ill, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/10
Source: “Assess the condition of children who are ill, injured, or have disabilities.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Assessing an ill or injured child means examining them and reading how they look and behave.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Treating patients in hospital wards or outpatient clinics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/10
Source: “Treat patients in hospital wards or outpatient clinics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Treating patients happens in person on the ward or in clinic, and only a registered doctor may direct it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing and examining patients to establish if an operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/14
Source: “Assess and examine patients to establish if an operation is necessary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Deciding whether an operation is needed rests on examining the patient as well as reading the tests.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating clinics within hospital outpatient departments or GP surgeries
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: clinics within hospital outpatient departments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Operate clinics within hospital outpatient departments or GP surgeries.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a clinic means seeing patients in person, one after another, in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Training medical students in clinical procedures to develop their practical skills
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/08
Source: “Train medical students in clinical procedures to develop their practical skills.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 3 out of 100 (0–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching procedures means supervising students' hands on real patients, which software cannot do remotely.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Having some contact with patients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: some contact, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/07
Source: “Have some contact with patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 1 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, low confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: This is about being with patients, which is the one thing software cannot do.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Administering general anaesthetics to patients to induce unconsciousness for surgery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: general anaesthetics, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/01
Source: “Administer general anaesthetics to patients to induce unconsciousness for surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Putting someone to sleep for surgery means a doctor at the trolley with drugs, needles and airway equipment in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Maintaining life support and airway management for patients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: life support, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/01
Source: “Maintain life support and airway management for patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping a patient breathing means hands on the airway and equipment, second by second, at the bedside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing anaesthesia during surgical procedures to ensure patient safety and comfort
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: anaesthesia during surgical procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/01
Source: “Manage anaesthesia during surgical procedures to ensure patient safety and comfort.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Running an anaesthetic through an operation is continuous hands-on work in theatre, not something done from a screen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Monitoring anaesthesia to ensure patient safety during procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: anaesthesia, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/01
Source: “Monitor anaesthesia to ensure patient safety during procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Machines already display the readings, but watching a patient under anaesthetic means being there ready to act within seconds.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing pain relief to patients using anaesthetics and analgesics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: pain relief, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/01
Source: “Provide pain relief to patients using anaesthetics and analgesics.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Giving pain relief means drawing up and delivering drugs to a patient in person, under a doctor's legal authority.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Continuing anaesthesia in the operating theatre
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: anaesthesia, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/01
Source: “Continue anaesthesia in the operating theatre.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Maintaining an anaesthetic in theatre is continuous physical care of a patient who cannot look after themselves.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing patients for surgery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/01
Source: “Prepare patients for surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a patient ready for theatre happens at the bedside with hands on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing emergency resuscitations on patients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: emergency resuscitations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/01
Source: “Perform emergency resuscitations on patients.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Resuscitation is chest compressions, drugs and airway control done by people standing over the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Injecting subcutaneous local anaesthetic postoperatively to reduce pain
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: subcutaneous local anaesthetic, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/01
Source: “Inject subcutaneous local anaesthetic postoperatively to reduce pain.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Injecting local anaesthetic after an operation is a needle in a person's skin, done by a doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Positioning patients for surgical preparation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/01
Source: “Position patients for surgical preparation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Positioning a patient for surgery is lifting and arranging a body on a table.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in an on-call rota and providing equal share of emergency cover
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: this work, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/01
Source: “Participate in an on-call rota and provide equal share of emergency cover.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Being on call is about a named doctor physically turning up when an emergency comes in.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assisting in administering specialist treatments to patients under supervision
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: administering specialist treatments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2212/01
Source: “Assist in administering specialist treatments to patients under supervision.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Helping give a specialist treatment means hands on the patient and the equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Administering advanced cardiac life support
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: advanced cardiac life support, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/02
Source: “Administer advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) during emergencies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Advanced life support is drugs, shocks and compressions delivered by hands at the bedside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting echocardiogram to record patients' cardiac activity using specialised equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: echocardiogram, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/02
Source: “Conduct echocardiogram to record patients' cardiac activity using specialised equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Getting the pictures means holding the probe on someone's chest and adjusting it by feel.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Diagnosing cardiovascular conditions using cardiac catheterisation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cardiovascular conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/02
Source: “Diagnose cardiovascular conditions using cardiac catheterisation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Threading a catheter into the heart is a surgical act performed by a doctor on a live patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing advanced cardiac procedures, including bypass surgery, stenting and angioplasty
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: advanced cardiac procedures, including bypass surgery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/02
Source: “Perform advanced cardiac procedures, including bypass surgery, stenting, and angioplasty.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Bypass surgery, stents and angioplasty are operations carried out by hand inside a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting exercise ECG tests to monitor cardiovascular activity under stress
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: exercise ECG tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Conduct exercise ECG tests to monitor cardiovascular activity under stress.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A treadmill stress test means wiring someone up and watching them exercise with a doctor on hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Injecting contrast medium into patients' blood vessels
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: contrast medium, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Inject contrast medium into patients' blood vessels.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: This is a needle into a patient's vein, done by a trained clinician in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Operating diagnostic imaging equipment to produce contrast-enhanced radiographs of heart and cardiovascular system
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diagnostic imaging equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/02
Source: “Operate diagnostic imaging equipment to produce contrast-enhanced radiographs of heart and cardiovascular system.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: This means operating scanning equipment on a patient, which needs a trained person physically present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assisting in pacemaker and ICD implantation operations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: pacemaker, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/02
Source: “Assist in pacemaker and ICD implantation operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Fitting a pacemaker is an operation, and assisting means hands in the sterile field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as an interventional procedure
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/02, 2212/12
Source: “Conduct percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as an interventional procedure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Opening a blocked artery with a balloon is a physical procedure done inside a live patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting tests of the pulmonary system using spirometer or other respiratory testing equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tests of the pulmonary system, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2212/02
Source: “Conduct tests of the pulmonary system using spirometer or other respiratory testing equipment.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Lung function testing means coaching a patient to breathe into equipment held in front of them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering intralesional steroids to treat skin conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: intralesional steroids, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/03
Source: “Administer intralesional steroids to treat skin conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Injecting steroid into a lesion is a needle procedure carried out by a doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing skin surgery to control diseases like skin cancer
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: skin surgery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/03
Source: “Perform skin surgery to control diseases like skin cancer.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Cutting cancerous tissue out of skin is surgery performed with instruments on a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Treating dysplastic moles
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: dysplastic moles, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/03
Source: “Treat dysplastic moles.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Dealing with an abnormal mole normally means cutting it out under local anaesthetic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting comedo removal for skin clarity
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: comedo removal, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/03
Source: “Conduct comedo removal for skin clarity.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Squeezing out blocked pores is close-up manual work on someone's skin.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing diagnostic tests, skin pricks and intradermal, patch or delayed hypersensitivity tests
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diagnostic tests, skin pricks and intradermal, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/03
Source: “Perform diagnostic tests such as skin pricks and intradermal, patch, or delayed hypersensitivity tests.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Skin prick and patch testing means applying substances to a patient and reading the reaction on their skin.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing chemical peels to improve skin texture and appearance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: chemical peels, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/03
Source: “Perform chemical peels to improve skin texture and appearance.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Applying a chemical peel is treatment put onto a patient's face by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing dermabrasion or laser abrasion to treat atrophic scars
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: dermabrasion, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/03
Source: “Provide dermabrasion or laser abrasion to treat atrophic scars, elevated scars, or other skin conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Resurfacing skin with abrasion or laser is a physical treatment delivered directly to the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing surgeries on patients to repair injuries or treat diseases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surgeries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/04, 2212/09, 2212/14
Source: “Perform surgeries on patients to repair injuries or treat diseases.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Surgery is physical work on a patient's body that software cannot perform.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Administering vaccinations to patients with gastrointestinal conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: vaccinations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/04
Source: “Administer vaccinations to patients with gastrointestinal conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Giving a vaccination is a needle into a patient's arm.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing caesarean sections to deliver babies safely
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: caesarean sections, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/05
Source: “Perform caesarean sections to deliver babies safely.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A caesarean is major surgery performed by hand on a mother and baby.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Preparing patients for examinations, tests or treatments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/05
Source: “Prepare patients for examinations, tests, or treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a patient ready happens physically, at their side.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Receiving and preparing blood samples for analysis
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: blood samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 90 · 2212/06
Source: “Receive and prepare blood samples for analysis.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Receiving and preparing samples is physical handling of tubes and specimens in the laboratory.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out histochemistry procedures to prepare specimens for immunofluorescence or microscopy
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: histochemistry procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/06
Source: “Carry out histochemistry procedures to prepare specimens for immunofluorescence or microscopy.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Histochemistry is hands-on bench work with chemicals, slides and specimens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing tissue specimens
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tissue specimens, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/06
Source: “Prepare tissue specimens for teaching, research, or diagnostic purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Preparing tissue specimens means cutting, handling and mounting real material at the bench.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing cell samples by applying special staining techniques to differentiate cells or cell components
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cell samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2212/06, 2212/09
Source: “Prepare cell samples by applying special staining techniques to differentiate cells or cell components.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Staining cell samples is manual laboratory work with reagents and slides.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Cutting stain and mounting tissue samples for examination by pathologists
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: stain, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/06
Source: “Cut, stain, and mount tissue samples for examination by pathologists.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Cutting, staining and mounting tissue is precise handwork with a microtome and slides.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Operating computerised laboratory equipment to dehydrate tissue samples
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: computerised laboratory equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/06
Source: “Operate computerised laboratory equipment to dehydrate tissue samples.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Loading and running the tissue processor is physical work with the machine and the specimens.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing the chosen homeopathic remedies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the chosen homeopathic remedies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/07
Source: “Prepare the chosen homeopathic remedies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Making up a remedy is physical preparation of the actual medicine.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting physical examinations of patients to inform holistic treatment plans
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: physical examinations of patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/07
Source: “Conduct physical examinations of patients to inform holistic treatment plans.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A physical examination means looking at, listening to and feeling a patient in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining cleanliness and security of the dispensary
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: cleanliness, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/07
Source: “Maintain cleanliness and security of the dispensary.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Keeping the dispensary clean and secure is physical work in the room itself.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Growing herbal medicines
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: herbal medicines, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2212/07
Source: “Grow herbal medicines.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Growing plants means soil, water and hands in a garden.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Testing brain tissue samples for research purposes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: brain tissue samples, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 65 · 2212/08
Source: “Test brain tissue samples for research purposes.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Testing brain tissue is bench work with real specimens and laboratory equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Taking fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens in breast clinics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 60 · 2212/09
Source: “Take fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens in breast clinics when required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking a needle sample from a breast lump is a procedure carried out on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing medical operations following specific paediatric procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical operations following specific paediatric procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 70 · 2212/10
Source: “Perform medical operations following specific paediatric procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Operating on a child is surgery carried out by hand in a theatre.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting scans to exclude specific health issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: scans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 50 · 2212/11
Source: “Conduct scans to exclude specific health issues.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Scanning a patient means positioning them and operating the machine in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing diagnostic imaging procedures, such as MRI, CT, PET, nuclear cardiology treadmill studies, mammography and ultrasound
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diagnostic imaging procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 95 · 2212/12
Source: “Perform diagnostic imaging procedures, such as MRI, CT, PET, nuclear cardiology treadmill studies, mammography, and ultrasound.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Running MRI, CT or ultrasound examinations is hands-on work with the patient and the equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering radioisotopes to clinical patients or researching subjects
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: radioisotopes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Administer radioisotopes to clinical patients or research subjects.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Giving a patient a radioactive dose is hands-on clinical work by an authorized doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Assisting in conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists and surgeons
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Assist in conducting complex radiological examinations alongside radiologists and surgeons.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assisting with a complex radiological examination means being in the room with the patient and equipment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Using minimally invasive techniques for various interventional body treatments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: invasive techniques, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/12
Source: “Use minimally invasive techniques for various interventional body treatments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Interventional treatment means guiding instruments inside a patient's body by hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Testing dosage evaluation instruments and surveying meters to ensure they are operating properly
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: dosage evaluation instruments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Test dosage evaluation instruments and survey meters to ensure they are operating properly.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–7 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence, and it moved between repeat runs, so the range is widened.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing survey meters means handling the instruments and taking readings from them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating complications, blood pressure issues, pain, oversedation or bleeding
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: complications, blood pressure issues, pain, oversedation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/12
Source: “Treat complications such as blood pressure issues, pain, oversedation, or bleeding.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Treating bleeding or a dangerous blood pressure during a procedure is immediate hands-on care.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out transhepatic biliary drainage as an interventional procedure
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: transhepatic biliary drainage, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Carry out transhepatic biliary drainage as an interventional procedure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Draining a bile duct through the liver is an invasive procedure done by hand under imaging.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Placing nephrostomy catheters as an interventional procedure
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: nephrostomy catheters, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Place nephrostomy catheters as an interventional procedure.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Placing a drain into a kidney is an invasive procedure carried out on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Taking part in surgical procedures like biopsies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: part, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/12
Source: “Take part in surgical procedures like biopsies.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Taking part in a biopsy means being in theatre with instruments in hand.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Examining patients to obtain information about functional status
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/13
Source: “Examine patients to obtain information about functional status including vision, strength, coordination, reflexes, sensations, language skills, cognitive abilities, and mental status.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing strength, reflexes and coordination means physically examining the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Carrying out nerve conduction studies to assess nerve damage
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: nerve conduction studies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Carry out nerve conduction studies to assess nerve damage.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Nerve conduction studies mean stimulating and recording from a patient's limbs in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting electromyography for diagnosing neuromuscular disorders
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electromyography, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/13
Source: “Conduct electromyography for diagnosing neuromuscular disorders.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Electromyography involves putting needles into muscle and interpreting what is felt and heard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting physical tests, such as functional capacity evaluations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: physical tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/13
Source: “Conduct physical tests, such as functional capacity evaluations, to determine injured workers' capabilities to perform the physical demands of their jobs.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A functional capacity test involves watching someone physically perform tasks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Administering local anaesthetic to patients to perform minor surgical procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: local anaesthetic, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Administer local anaesthetic to patients to perform minor surgical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Injecting local anaesthetic before a minor procedure is a needle in a patient's skin.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assisting fellow surgeons during intricate surgical operations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: fellow surgeons during intricate surgical operations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Assist fellow surgeons during intricate surgical operations.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assisting in an operation means sterile hands inside the surgical field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting surgeries for orthopaedic conditions in operating theatres
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surgeries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Conduct surgeries for orthopaedic conditions in operating theatres.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Orthopaedic surgery is physical work on bone and joint with instruments in theatre.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Following established surgical techniques during the operation
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: established surgical techniques during the operation, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Follow established surgical techniques during the operation.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Operating is manual work carried out on a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing abdominal surgeries
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: abdominal surgeries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Perform abdominal surgeries as required.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Abdominal surgery is performed by hand inside the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing reconstructive surgery on patients recovering from burns or illness
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: reconstructive surgery, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Perform reconstructive surgery on patients recovering from burns or illness.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reconstructive surgery is precise physical work on a patient's tissue.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing surgeries on patients from foetuses to adolescents to treat various conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surgeries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Perform surgeries on patients from foetuses to adolescents to treat various conditions.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Operating on children is skilled handwork carried out in theatre.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Removing diseased tissue, using surgical instruments
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diseased tissue, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 85 · 2212/14
Source: “Remove diseased tissue, using surgical instruments.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: This is surgery with instruments inside the patient's body, which software cannot do at all.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the administration of general anaesthetics to ensure patient readiness for surgery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the administration of general anaesthetics, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Oversee the administration of general anaesthetics to ensure patient readiness for surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Overseeing anaesthesia means being in theatre while the patient is put under.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing pre-operative medical tests to ensure patient readiness for surgery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: pre-operative medical tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Perform pre-operative medical tests to ensure patient readiness for surgery.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Pre-operative testing means taking samples and examining the patient in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Restoring tissue function through medical procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: tissue function, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 80 · 2212/14
Source: “Restore tissue function through medical procedures.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Restoring tissue function is surgical work carried out on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Carrying out minor cosmetic procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: minor cosmetic procedures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/14
Source: “Carry out minor cosmetic procedures, such as chin and cheekbone enhancements.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Cosmetic facial procedures are carried out by hand on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Inserting implants for cosmetic enhancement
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: implants, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/14
Source: “Insert implants for cosmetic enhancement.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Inserting an implant is surgery performed on a patient in theatre.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing liposuction to remove excess fat
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: liposuction, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/14
Source: “Perform liposuction to remove excess fat.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Liposuction is a physical surgical procedure carried out on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Treating facial lacerations as emergency care
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: facial lacerations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 75 · 2212/14
Source: “Treat facial lacerations as emergency care.” (UK task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Repairing a facial wound means stitching a patient in front of you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: £92,800a year, before tax, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.ashe-t14, 2025 · ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
How we know this
Source: ashe-t14
Reference period: ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025)
Rounding: Shown to the nearest £100. The exact published figure is in the downloadable dataset. We do not render pounds the survey cannot support.
People doing this job: 154,900in the UK, 2026.nomis-aps · Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period)This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: reports of diagnostic procedures in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: distributing reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors and reviewing initial data for abnormalities in white or red blood cells. What it cannot do is be answerable: patient progress needs a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: monitoring and evaluating patient progress to adjust treatment plans is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 10% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 24% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 66% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 379 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Distributing reports of diagnostic procedures to doctors is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to reports of diagnostic procedures, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding: a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes: ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether patient progress is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no licence needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near maintaining accurate and confidential patient or client records. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, spend an hour with National Careers Service. It is free and government-funded, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest UK occupations to specialist medical practitioners and consultants (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was registered specialist nurses: only about 3% of its durable work is work you already do and it pays 51.4% less. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 28/100 here, with only 10% of the task list in the top band, and “direct activities of nurses and healthcare assistants” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 412 UK occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Registered specialist nurses
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “administer advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) during emergencies”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 3% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £45,140 against your £92,847, 51.4% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Registered children's nurses
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “assess the condition of children who are ill, injured, or have disabilities”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 2% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £41,963 against your £92,847, 54.8% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Generalist medical practitioners
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “direct activities of nurses and healthcare assistants”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 2% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: £55,494 against your £92,847, 40.2% less (ASHE Table 14.7a, 2025 provisional (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 10% of its task weight, across 379 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like monitoring and evaluating patient progress to adjust treatment plans arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United Kingdom figures

The United States splits this work across more than one official group, of which Anesthesiologists is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United States page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In US official statistics this job is counted as Anesthesiologists, Cardiologists, Dermatologists, Emergency Medicine Physicians, General Internal Medicine Physicians, Neurologists, Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Physicians, Pathologists, Psychiatrists, Radiologists, Physicians, All Other, Ophthalmologists, Except Pediatric, Orthopedic Surgeons, Except Pediatric, Pediatric Surgeons and Surgeons, All Other. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

In England:
National Careers Service
A free hour with a government-funded careers adviser is worth more than another evening of reading. In England that's the National Careers Service.
Free, government-funded
- Discover your skills and careers (the skills assessment)
In England:
National Careers Service - Find a course
Search what's actually running near you before you spend anything.
Free to search; individual courses vary
In England:
Free courses for jobs (Level 3 qualifications)
A free Level 3 qualification you already qualify for beats a paid course you don't need.
Free for eligible adults
In England:
Skills Bootcamps
Free, up to 16 weeks, and you get a job interview at the end. In England these are Skills Bootcamps - search what's running near you.
Free for eligible adults in England
- Skills Bootcamps - what they are and who can do them (DfE, Skills for Careers)
- Skills Bootcamps - JobHelp (DWP)
In Scotland:
My World of Work (Skills Development Scotland)
In Scotland it's My World of Work, from Skills Development Scotland.
Free, publicly funded
- Skills Development Scotland
In Wales:
Careers Wales
In Wales it's Careers Wales.
Free, Welsh Government-funded
In Northern Ireland:
Careers Service Northern Ireland
In Northern Ireland it's the Careers Service on nidirect.
Free, Department for the Economy-funded

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for specialist medical practitioners / consultants, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 10% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for specialist medical practitioners / consultants. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for specialist medical practitioners / consultants launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for specialist medical practitioners / consultants yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for specialist medical practitioners / consultants existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for specialist medical practitioners / consultants launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Specialist medical practitioners and consultants?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 379 official task statements scored for Specialist medical practitioners and consultants (United Kingdom, SOC 2212), 10% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 28 out of 100 (range 23–34, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Specialist medical practitioners and consultants” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Apply computer programming to analyse data in scientific research” (100/100, very high); “Document detailed observations and interactions with clients” (88/100, very high); “Analyse test data using computer modelling software” (88/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Specialist medical practitioners and consultants” stay human?: About 66% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Treat facial lacerations as emergency care” (0/100, minimal); “Perform liposuction to remove excess fat” (0/100, minimal); “Insert implants for cosmetic enhancement” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Specialist medical practitioners and consultants” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 10% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 66% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Specialist medical practitioners and consultants calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 379 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

About the data on this page

Provisional, because the ONS revises this figure in the autumn.
This headcount comes from a survey, not a census, so treat it as a good estimate rather than an exact count.
No importance weighting is published for some of these tasks, so they are treated as equally central, which is a simplification rather than a measurement.
One task scored differently between repeat runs, so its range on this page is wider. We would rather show the wobble than hide it.
One row is marked low confidence, so treat it as a ballpark rather than a fine measurement.
The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
15 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
At least one of this occupation's task rows has no published task-relatedness and falls back to the uniform weight: the documented exception path, not an alternative weighting scheme.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: gaisi-indexProcessing: catalogue-bridge → ssc-relatedness-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: gaisi-index (relatedness-with-uniform)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: ashe-t14 (ASHE 2025 provisional (reference April 2025))nomis-aps (Apr 2025-Mar 2026 (latest APS 12-month period))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.