Will AI replace Physicians, All Other?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 101 official task statements scored for Physicians, All Other (United States, SOC 29-1229), 12% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 29 out of 100 (range 24–35, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Physicians, All Other” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Prepare preventive health reports, including problem descriptions, analyses, alternative solutions, and recommendations” (72/100, high); “Design or use surveillance tools, such as screening, lab reports, and vital records, to identify health risks” (72/100, high); “Document patients' medical histories” (69/100, high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Physicians, All Other” stay human?

About 66% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Examine patients using equipment, such as radiograph (x-ray) machines or fluoroscopes, to determine the nature and extent of disorder or injury” (0/100, minimal); “Perform brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or photodynamic therapy to treat prostate or other cancers” (0/100, minimal); “Perform abdominal, pelvic, or retroperitoneal surgeries” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Physicians, All Other” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 12% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 66% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Physicians, All Other calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 101 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

US dataswitch to UK

Physicians, All Other

prescribing medications or treatment regimens to hospital inpatients, participating in continuing education activities to improve and maintain knowledge and skills and advising athletes. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

AI changes the edges of this job, not the middle: diagnosing, treating or providing continuous care to hospital inpatients is work software can't reach.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 12%
changing shape: 22%
staying human: 66%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 29 out of 100 (24–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, across 101 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for physicians, all other is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

What shifts is documenting patients' medical histories: the overhead at the edges, not the middle you trained for.

Your week, as this page understands it

All physicians not listed separately. The job title says “physicians” or “all other”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: diagnosing, treating or providing continuous care to hospital inpatients. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But physicians, all other is not one task. It is 101 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is diagnosing, treating or providing continuous care to hospital inpatients, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 12%
changing shape: 22%
staying human: 66%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

8 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

12 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Documenting patients' medical histories
This is reading one thing and writing another: patients' medical histories in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Document patients' medical histories.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Writing up a patient's history from the consultation is routine documentation that tools already draft well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting or reviewing patients' histories
This is reading one thing and writing another: patients' histories in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Document or review patients' histories.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Writing up and checking patient histories is routine documentation that tools already draft well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Documenting examination results, treatment plans and patients' outcomes
This is reading one thing and writing another: examination results, treatment plans and patients' outcomes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Document examination results, treatment plans, and patients' outcomes.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Writing up findings, plans and outcomes is routine documentation that drafting tools handle well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Writing patient discharge summaries and send them to primary care physicians
This is reading one thing and writing another: patient discharge summaries in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Write patient discharge summaries and send them to primary care physicians.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Discharge summaries are built from notes already in the record, which drafting tools do quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Changing shape

23 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Ordering or interpreting the results of tests
The software now makes the first pass at the results of tests, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Order or interpret the results of tests such as laboratory tests and radiographs (x-rays).” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 41 out of 100 (34–48 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reading labs and scans is well suited to software, yet the ordering doctor stays legally responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Educating patients about diagnoses, prognoses or treatments
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Educate patients about diagnoses, prognoses, or treatments.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Explaining conditions and treatments is well-trodden ground for written material, though the doctor normally delivers the news.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Ordering and interpreting the results of diagnostic tests
The software now makes the first pass at the results of diagnostic tests, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Order and interpret the results of diagnostic tests, such as prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening, to detect prostate cancer.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 41 out of 100 (34–48 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Blood-test results follow published thresholds that software reads reliably, though the doctor remains responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Staying human

66 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Prescribing medications or treatment regimens to hospital inpatients
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medications, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Prescribe medications or treatment regimens to hospital inpatients.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Regimens follow published protocols, but only a licensed doctor can order them for a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing, treating or providing continuous care to hospital inpatients
This work happens in the physical world: continuous care, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Diagnose, treat, or provide continuous care to hospital inpatients.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Looking after inpatients means daily bedside work by a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing or treating diseases or disorders of genitourinary organs and tracts
This work happens in the physical world: diseases, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Diagnose or treat diseases or disorders of genitourinary organs and tracts including erectile dysfunction (ED), infertility, incontinence, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, urethral stones, or premature ejaculation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing and treating these conditions involves examination and procedures done by a licensed specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 91 tasks

Preparing preventive health reports, including problem descriptions, analyses, alternative solutions and recommendations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: preventive health reports, including problem descriptions, analyses in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prepare preventive health reports, including problem descriptions, analyses, alternative solutions, and recommendations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Health reports with analysis and options are well-structured documents that drafting tools produce strongly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing or using surveillance tools
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: surveillance tools in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Design or use surveillance tools, such as screening, lab reports, and vital records, to identify health risks.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 72 out of 100 (68–76 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building and running health-surveillance systems from lab and records data is squarely computer work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Documenting or reviewing comprehensive patients' histories with an emphasis on occupation or environmental risks
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: comprehensive patients' histories in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Document or review comprehensive patients' histories with an emphasis on occupation or environmental risks.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recording a work and environment history is structured documentation that tools draft reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording athletes' medical care information
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: athletes' medical care information in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Record athletes' medical care information, and maintain medical records.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Keeping medical records up to date is routine documentation that tools handle quickly and accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating the effectiveness of prescribed risk reduction measures or other interventions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the effectiveness of prescribed risk reduction measures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Evaluate the effectiveness of prescribed risk reduction measures or other interventions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Judging whether a measure worked is analysis of recorded results, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying groups at risk for specific preventable diseases or injuries
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: groups in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Identify groups at risk for specific preventable diseases or injuries.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding at-risk groups is population data analysis, exactly what analytical tools are built for.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing the risks and benefits of therapies for allergic and immunologic disorders
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: the risks in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Assess the risks and benefits of therapies for allergic and immunologic disorders.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 62 out of 100 (55–69 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Weighing published evidence on benefits and harms is research and summarising, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Advising athletes on ways that substances
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: athletes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Advise athletes on ways that substances, such as herbal remedies, could affect drug testing results.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 61 out of 100 (57–65 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Banned-substance and interaction lists are published and searchable, which makes checking them straightforward.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Directing or supporting quality improvement projects or safety programs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quality improvement projects, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct or support quality improvement projects or safety programs.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Safety and improvement projects run on hospital data and written analysis, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and prescribing exercise programs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at exercise programs, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Develop and prescribe exercise programs, such as off-season conditioning regimens.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 53 out of 100 (46–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Conditioning programmes are heavily documented and build well from an athlete's recorded data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing information about potential health hazards and possible interventions to the media
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at information, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide information about potential health hazards and possible interventions to the media, the public, other health care professionals, or local, state, and federal health authorities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 51 out of 100 (44–58 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Briefing notes and public explanations draft strongly, though a named expert usually fronts them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing education and counseling on illness and injury prevention
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at education, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide education and counseling on illness and injury prevention.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 51 out of 100 (44–58 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Injury prevention advice is well documented and drafts well, though athletes listen to people they know.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Informing athletes about nutrition, hydration, dietary supplements or uses and possible consequences of medication
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at athletes, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Inform athletes about nutrition, hydration, dietary supplements, or uses and possible consequences of medication.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 51 out of 100 (44–58 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Nutrition and medication information is public and abundant, making it easy to prepare accurately.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Engaging in self-directed learning and continuing education activities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at self-directed, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Engage in self-directed learning and continuing education activities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Study material is abundant and easy to summarise, but the learning has to happen in the doctor's own head.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Referring patients to medical specialists
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Refer patients to medical specialists, social services, or other professionals as appropriate.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Matching a patient's needs to the right specialist or service is largely documented, repeatable decision-making.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in continuing education activities to maintain or enhance knowledge and skills
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at continuing education activities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Participate in continuing education activities to maintain or enhance knowledge and skills.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Course material is easy to gather, but the doctor is the one who has to learn it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Communicating with patients' primary care physicians upon admission
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients' primary care physicians upon admission, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Communicate with patients' primary care physicians upon admission, when treatment plans change, or at discharge to maintain continuity and quality of care.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Handover letters to a family doctor are standard documents that draft well from the notes.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Participating in continuing education activities to improve and maintain knowledge and skills
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at continuing education activities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Participate in continuing education activities to improve and maintain knowledge and skills.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over.
The rating behind it: Course material is easy to gather, but the doctor is the one who has to learn it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Referring athletes for specialized consultation
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at athletes, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Refer athletes for specialized consultation, physical therapy, or diagnostic testing.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Deciding which specialist or test an athlete needs follows documented criteria.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Referring patients to specialists when condition exceeds experience
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at patients, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Refer patients to specialists when condition exceeds experience, expertise, or scope of practice.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Recognising when a case falls outside your scope follows documented criteria and routes to a known specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Presenting research findings at national meetings or in peer-reviewed journals
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at research findings, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Present research findings at national meetings or in peer-reviewed journals.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Papers and slides draft strongly from results, though someone has to stand up and present them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Directing public health education programs dealing with topics
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at public health education programs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct public health education programs dealing with topics such as preventable diseases, injuries, nutrition, food service sanitation, water supply safety, sewage and waste disposal, insect control, and immunizations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Public health education material is abundant and drafts well, though running the programme involves people on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Designing, implementing or evaluating health service delivery systems to improve the health of targeted populations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at health service delivery systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Design, implement, or evaluate health service delivery systems to improve the health of targeted populations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Service designs can be drafted and modelled, but making them work involves local knowledge and negotiation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting research in the prevention or treatment of injuries or medical conditions related to sports and exercise
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at research, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Conduct research in the prevention or treatment of injuries or medical conditions related to sports and exercise.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Study design, analysis and write-up draft strongly, though collecting the data involves real participants.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing and testing procedures for dealing with emergencies during practices or competitions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at procedures, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop and test procedures for dealing with emergencies during practices or competitions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 42 out of 100 (35–49 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Emergency plans are written documents that draft well, though testing them means running the drill.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing allergy or immunology consultation or education to physicians or other health care providers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at allergy, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide allergy or immunology consultation or education to physicians or other health care providers.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 41 out of 100 (34–48 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Specialist advice is well documented, though colleagues expect a named specialist to stand behind the answer.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Interpreting diagnostic test results to make appropriate differential diagnoses
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at diagnostic test results, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Interpret diagnostic test results to make appropriate differential diagnoses.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 41 out of 100 (34–48 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Test patterns are well documented and read reliably by software, yet the diagnosis must be made by a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Providing urology consultation to physicians or other health care professionals
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at urology consultation, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Provide urology consultation to physicians or other health care professionals.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 41 out of 100 (34–48 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Specialist advice draws on well-documented practice, though colleagues expect a named specialist behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Informing coaches, trainers or other interested parties regarding the medical conditions of athletes
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for coaches, trainers or other interested parties regarding, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Inform coaches, trainers, or other interested parties regarding the medical conditions of athletes.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Reports can be drafted easily, but sharing medical information about an athlete carries professional responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering and interpreting the results of laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging procedures
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the results of laboratory tests, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Order and interpret the results of laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging procedures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 38 out of 100 (31–45 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Reading tests and scans suits software well, though the ordering doctor stays legally responsible.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating physical medicine and rehabilitation services with other medical activities
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for physical medicine, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate physical medicine and rehabilitation services with other medical activities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Lining up rehabilitation with other treatment is scheduling and messaging, though clinicians still confer directly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing epidemiological investigations of acute and chronic diseases
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for epidemiological investigations of acute, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Perform epidemiological investigations of acute and chronic diseases.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 36 out of 100 (29–43 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Outbreak investigation is largely data work, though some tracing and sampling happens in the field.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing medication, antihistamines, antibiotics and nasal, oral, topical or inhaled glucocorticosteroids
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medication, antihistamines, antibiotics and nasal, oral, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Prescribe medication such as antihistamines, antibiotics, and nasal, oral, topical, or inhaled glucocorticosteroids.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Drug choices follow published guidance, but writing a prescription is legally reserved for a licensed prescriber.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Prescribing physical therapy to relax the muscles and improving strength
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for physical therapy, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prescribe physical therapy to relax the muscles and improve strength.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Exercise prescriptions follow well-published protocols, but ordering therapy is a licensed doctor's act.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Developing or implementing interventions to address behavioral causes of diseases
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles interventions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop or implement interventions to address behavioral causes of diseases.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Behaviour-change methods are documented, though getting people to change habits involves working with communities.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing medications for the treatment of athletic-related injuries
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medications, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prescribe medications for the treatment of athletic-related injuries.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 35 out of 100 (28–42 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Drug choices follow published guidance, but writing a prescription is reserved to a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Prescribing therapy services, such as electrotherapy, ultrasonography, heat or cold therapy, hydrotherapy, debridement
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for therapy services, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prescribe therapy services, such as electrotherapy, ultrasonography, heat or cold therapy, hydrotherapy, debridement, short-wave or microwave diathermy, and infrared or ultraviolet radiation, to enhance rehabilitation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These therapy orders follow documented protocols, but prescribing them is reserved to a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing comprehensive plans for immediate and long-term rehabilitation
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for comprehensive plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop comprehensive plans for immediate and long-term rehabilitation, including therapeutic exercise, speech and occupational therapy, counseling, cognitive retraining, patient, family or caregiver education, or community reintegration.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A rehabilitation plan can be drafted from the assessments, but a licensed doctor decides what the patient receives.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating the care of patients with other health care professionals or supporting staff
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the care of patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate the care of patients with other health care professionals or support staff.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Messages and schedules can be handled automatically, but coordinating care still runs on conversations between clinicians.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing characteristics of patients' pain
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for characteristics of patients' pain, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Assess characteristics of patients' pain, such as intensity, location, or duration, using standardized clinical measures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Pain is scored with standard questionnaires, which software can collect and summarise consistently.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring effectiveness of pain management interventions
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for effectiveness of pain management interventions, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Monitor effectiveness of pain management interventions, such as medication or spinal injections.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Tracking whether treatment is working is largely reading recorded scores over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Consulting or coordinating with other rehabilitative professionals
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for other rehabilitative professionals, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Consult or coordinate with other rehabilitative professionals, including physical and occupational therapists, rehabilitation nurses, speech pathologists, neuropsychologists, behavioral psychologists, social workers, or medical technicians.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Case discussions with therapists and social workers are live conversations, though the notes draft easily.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Teaching or training medical staff regarding preventive medicine issues
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles medical staff regarding preventive medicine issues and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Teach or train medical staff regarding preventive medicine issues.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material is easy to prepare, but sessions with medical staff are delivered by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Directing or managing prevention programs in specialty areas
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for prevention programs, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Direct or manage prevention programs in specialty areas such as aerospace, occupational, infectious disease, and environmental medicine.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Programme documents and plans draft well, but running a programme means leading the people delivering it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating sports care activities with other experts
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for sports care activities, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate sports care activities with other experts, including specialty physicians and surgeons, athletic trainers, physical therapists, or coaches.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Scheduling and notes are easy to handle with software, though coordinating care runs on conversations between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising coaches, trainers or physical therapists on the proper use of exercises and other therapeutic techniques and alert them to potentially dangerous practices
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for coaches, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Advise coaches, trainers, or physical therapists on the proper use of exercises and other therapeutic techniques, and alert them to potentially dangerous practices.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 30 out of 100 (23–37 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Exercise and therapy guidance is well documented, though coaches take it from someone they work with.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing medications to treat patients with erectile dysfunction
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medications, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Prescribe medications to treat patients with erectile dysfunction (ED), infertility, or ejaculation problems.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Treatment options are well documented, but prescribing is a licensed act and these conversations need care.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Delivering presentations to lay or professional audiences
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: presentations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Deliver presentations to lay or professional audiences.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Slides and notes are easy to prepare, but the talk itself is given to an audience.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting laboratory or clinical research on allergy or immunology topics
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: laboratory, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Conduct laboratory or clinical research on allergy or immunology topics.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Research design and analysis draft well, but bench and clinic work needs people handling samples and patients.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating or integrating the resources of health care institutions
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the resources of health care institutions and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate or integrate the resources of health care institutions, social service agencies, public safety workers, or other organizations to improve community health.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting agencies to pool resources depends on trust built with named people over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Prescribing orthotic and prosthetic applications and adaptive equipment
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for orthotic, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prescribe orthotic and prosthetic applications and adaptive equipment, such as wheelchairs, bracing, or communication devices, to maximize patient function and self-sufficiency.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Equipment options are documented, but a licensed doctor prescribes and the fit is checked in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing orthotics, prosthetics and adaptive equipment
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for orthotics, prosthetics and adaptive equipment, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Prescribe orthotics, prosthetics, and adaptive equipment.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Options are documented, but a licensed doctor prescribes and fitting is checked in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Teaching or training medical and clinical staff
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for medical and clinical staff, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Teach or train medical and clinical staff.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching material draft well, but clinical staff learn from a specialist working alongside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing individualized treatment plans
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for individualized treatment plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Develop individualized treatment plans for patients, considering patient preferences, clinical data, or the risks and benefits of therapies.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A plan can be drafted from the evidence, but choosing a patient's treatment is a licensed doctor's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising against injured athletes returning to games or competition if resuming activity could lead to further injury
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for injured athletes, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Advise against injured athletes returning to games or competition if resuming activity could lead to further injury.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Return-to-play rules are published, but the call is a licensed doctor's and has to be held against pressure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting discharge planning and discharge patients
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for discharge, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Conduct discharge planning and discharge patients.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Discharge plans assemble from the record, though signing a patient out of hospital is a doctor's decision.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Admitting patients for hospital stays
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for patients, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Admit patients for hospital stays.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Admission paperwork is routine, but deciding someone needs a hospital bed is a licensed doctor's call.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising athletes, trainers or coaches to alter or cease sports practices that are potentially harmful
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for athletes, trainers or coaches, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Advise athletes, trainers, or coaches to alter or cease sports practices that are potentially harmful.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 18 out of 100 (11–25 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Getting a coach to change a harmful training habit depends on the doctor's standing with that team.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising or coordinating the work of physicians
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the work of physicians, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Supervise or coordinate the work of physicians, nurses, statisticians, or other professional staff members.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising professional staff depends on working relationships with specific people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Instructing interns and residents in the diagnosis and treatment of temporary or permanent physically disabling conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: interns, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Instruct interns and residents in the diagnosis and treatment of temporary or permanent physically disabling conditions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Teaching notes draft well, but trainees learn by seeing real patients with a senior doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recording athletes' medical histories and performing physical examinations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: athletes' medical histories, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Record athletes' medical histories, and perform physical examinations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The history writes up easily, but the physical examination has to be done with the athlete present.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Supervising the rehabilitation of injured athletes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the rehabilitation of injured athletes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Supervise the rehabilitation of injured athletes.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (6–20 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Progress can be tracked on paper, but overseeing rehabilitation means watching the athlete work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing or treating allergic or immunologic conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: allergic, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Diagnose or treat allergic or immunologic conditions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 12 out of 100 (5–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Allergy guidance is well documented, but only a licensed doctor can examine, diagnose and treat a patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Selecting and preparing medical equipment or medications to be taken to athletic competition sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Select and prepare medical equipment or medications to be taken to athletic competition sites.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: The kit list is easy to draw up, but packing the bag is physical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing, coordinating or supervising the patient care activities of nursing or supporting staff
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the patient care activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Direct, coordinate, or supervise the patient care activities of nursing or support staff.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing ward staff happens on the ward, with a licensed doctor answerable for the care given.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the operations of short stay or specialty units
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the operations of short stay, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct the operations of short stay or specialty units.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Running a ward means being present and answerable for what happens on it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the work of nurses
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the work of nurses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Direct the work of nurses, residents, or other staff to provide patient care.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (2–16 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Directing nurses and residents happens in person, with a licensed doctor accountable for the care.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training or supervising medical students
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: medical students, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Train or supervise medical students, residents, or other health professionals.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Trainees learn medicine by being watched and corrected by a senior doctor beside them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing coaches and therapists with assistance in selecting and fitting protective equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: coaches, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Provide coaches and therapists with assistance in selecting and fitting protective equipment.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Fitting protective gear correctly means adjusting it on the person wearing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating and managing chronic pain conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: chronic pain conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Evaluate and manage chronic pain conditions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (0–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Long-term pain care is a licensed doctor's responsibility and depends on knowing the patient over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Prescribing or administering antibiotics, antiseptics or compresses to treat infection or injury
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: antibiotics, antiseptics or compresses, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Prescribe or administer antibiotics, antiseptics, or compresses to treat infection or injury.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (0–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Prescribing is restricted by law to registered prescribers, and giving the treatment is hands-on.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering or performing diagnostic tests
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: diagnostic tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Order or perform diagnostic tests such as skin pricks and intradermal, patch, or delayed hypersensitivity tests.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Skin and patch tests are applied to the patient's arm by a trained clinician.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Observing and evaluating athletes' mental well-
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: athletes' mental well-, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Observe and evaluate athletes' mental well-being.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (0–12 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Noticing that an athlete is struggling mentally depends on knowing them and being around them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Examining and evaluating athletes prior to participation in sports activities to determine level of physical fitness or predisposition
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: athletes prior, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Examine and evaluate athletes prior to participation in sports activities to determine level of physical fitness or predisposition to injuries.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A pre-season physical means examining the athlete in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Attending inpatient consultations in areas of specialty
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: inpatient consultations, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Attend inpatient consultations in areas of specialty.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: A bedside consultation means the specialist going to see the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing or treating performance-related conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: performance-related conditions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Diagnose or treat performance-related conditions, such as sports injuries or repetitive-motion injuries.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing and treating these injuries needs hands-on examination by a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing inpatient or outpatient medical management of neuromuscular disorders
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: inpatient, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Provide inpatient or outpatient medical management of neuromuscular disorders, musculoskeletal trauma, acute and chronic pain, deformity or amputation, cardiac or pulmonary disease, or other disabling conditions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Ongoing medical care for these conditions is delivered in person by a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining, evaluating and treating athletes who have been injured or who have medical problems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: athletes, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Examine, evaluate and treat athletes who have been injured or who have medical problems such as exercise-induced asthma.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Examining and treating an injured athlete is hands-on work by a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Diagnosing or treating disorders of the musculoskeletal system
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: disorders of the musculoskeletal system, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Diagnose or treat disorders of the musculoskeletal system.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Diagnosing and treating joint and muscle problems needs hands-on examination by a licensed doctor.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting physical examinations of patients
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: physical examinations of patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Conduct physical examinations of patients.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A physical examination means the doctor's hands and eyes on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing therapies, such as allergen immunotherapy or immunoglobin therapy, to treat immune conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: therapies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Provide therapies, such as allergen immunotherapy or immunoglobin therapy, to treat immune conditions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Giving an injection or infusion is hands-on treatment of the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing allergen provocation tests, nasal, conjunctival, bronchial, oral, food or medication challenges
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: allergen provocation tests, nasal, conjunctival, bronchial, oral, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Perform allergen provocation tests such as nasal, conjunctival, bronchial, oral, food, or medication challenges.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Challenge tests mean giving a patient a substance and watching them closely in the clinic.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting physical tests, such as functional capacity evaluations
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: physical tests, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Conduct physical tests, such as functional capacity evaluations, to determine injured workers' capabilities to perform the physical demands of their jobs.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A functional capacity test involves watching someone physically perform tasks.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Examining patients to assess mobility
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Examine patients to assess mobility, strength, communication, or cognition.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Testing someone's movement, strength and thinking means having them in front of you.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing electrodiagnosis, including electromyography, nerve conduction studies or somatosensory evoked potentials of neuromuscular disorders or damage
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: electrodiagnosis, including electromyography, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Perform electrodiagnosis, including electromyography, nerve conduction studies, or somatosensory evoked potentials of neuromuscular disorders or damage.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These nerve and muscle tests involve placing needles and electrodes on the patient.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Attending games and competitions to provide evaluation and treatment of activity-related injuries or medical conditions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: games, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Attend games and competitions to provide evaluation and treatment of activity-related injuries or medical conditions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Covering a match means the doctor being at the pitchside.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Treating urologic disorders using alternatives to traditional surgery
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: urologic disorders, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Treat urologic disorders using alternatives to traditional surgery such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, laparoscopy, or laser techniques.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These treatments are procedures performed on the patient by a licensed surgeon.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Treating lower urinary tract dysfunctions
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: lower urinary tract dysfunctions, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Treat lower urinary tract dysfunctions using equipment such as diathermy machines, catheters, cystoscopes, or radium emanation tubes.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Using catheters and scopes to treat a patient is hands-on clinical work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing abdominal, pelvic or retroperitoneal surgeries
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: abdominal, pelvic or retroperitoneal surgeries, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Perform abdominal, pelvic, or retroperitoneal surgeries.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Surgery is performed by a licensed surgeon's hands in an operating theatre.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Performing brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound, HIFU) or photodynamic therapy to treat prostate or other cancers
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Perform brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or photodynamic therapy to treat prostate or other cancers.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: These cancer treatments are procedures carried out on the patient by a licensed specialist.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Examining patients using equipment, such as radiograph, x-ray) machines or fluoroscopes
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: patients, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Examine patients using equipment, such as radiograph (x-ray) machines or fluoroscopes, to determine the nature and extent of disorder or injury.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Examining a patient with imaging equipment is done with the patient in the room.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: $265,930a year, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.bls-oews, 2025 · May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx)
How we know this
Source: bls-oews
Reference period: May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx)
Rounding: Shown as published.
People doing this job: 342,720in the US, 2025.bls-oews · May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx)

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: patients' medical histories in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: documenting patients' medical histories and documenting or reviewing patients' histories. What it cannot do is be answerable: continuous care needs a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Start with what does not change: diagnosing, treating or providing continuous care to hospital inpatients is the middle of this job, and the evidence on this page says it stays with a person.

So, given all that: 12% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 22% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 66% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 101 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

So the thing worth your attention is not the job going away. It is the layer around it. Documenting patients' medical histories is the part turning into software, and being the person who understands that layer is worth money.

This week: one thing

Ask the one question. Find whoever is bringing new software into your workplace (the manager, the office, whoever runs the system) and ask them what it is meant to do to patients' medical histories, and what it is not meant to touch. Ten minutes, this week, before anyone decides it for you.

What you end up holding: a straight answer about what is actually being rolled out, and when
How long it takes: ten minutes

If there’s nobody obvious to ask, or you’d rather not ask your manager: Put the same question to your union rep, your shift lead or the person who has been there longest, in person, over a break. Same ten minutes, same answer, and you will usually get a straighter one. Write down what they say. The note is the artifact, and it tells you whether continuous care is in scope or not. Nothing to log into, no license needed.

Over the next 90 days

Get inside the tool rollout rather than waiting for it. Over the next ninety days, ask to be in the group that tests, checks or signs off whatever new system arrives near ordering or interpreting the results of tests. It is usually an unglamorous seat that nobody fights for, and it is the one that decides how the software is used on your job rather than to it.

Over the next 12 months

On this evidence I would not retrain out of this job, and I will say that plainly rather than hedge it. The task list here is dominated by work that stays with a person. What I would do with a year is get formally recognised for the layer around it (the systems, the compliance, the planning), so you are the one who understands the software instead of the one it is done to. Before you pay for anything, use CareerOneStop - Find local training. It is free, it is the Labor Department's own service, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest US occupations to physicians, all other (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was healthcare diagnosing or treating practitioners, all other: only about 6% of its durable work is work you already do, it pays 56.7% less and there are far fewer of those jobs than of yours. And on the numbers you do not need one. This job scores 29/100 here, with only 12% of the task list in the top band, and “prescribe medications or treatment regimens to hospital inpatients” is not work that hands over cleanly. None of them beats deepening what you already have.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 830 US occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Healthcare Diagnosing or Treating Practitioners, All Other
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already conduct physical examinations of patients, and their equivalent is to conduct physical examinations and physiological function tests for diagnostic purposes. Across both published task lists that is about 6% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 6% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: $115,210 against your $265,930, 56.7% less (OEWS May 2025 (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 28,630 of those jobs against 342,720 of yours (OEWS May 2025), 8% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Orthopedic Surgeons, Except Pediatric
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour because one of your tasks is on their list in the same words: “diagnose or treat disorders of the musculoskeletal system”. Across the whole of both lists that adds up to about 5% of the work in that job the software is not taking.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 5% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. And it is a narrow door: about 14,100 of those jobs against 342,720 of yours (OEWS May 2025), 4% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Registered Nurses
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already coordinate the care of patients with other health care professionals or support staff, and their equivalent is to collaborate with other health care professionals and service providers to ensure optimal patient…. Across both published task lists that is about 4% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: $97,550 against your $265,930, 63.3% less (OEWS May 2025 (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 12% of its task weight, across 101 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The headlines about your trade disappearing
They are usually about the technology, not the timetable. Changes to work like diagnosing, treating or providing continuous care to hospital inpatients arrive through rules, insurance and money, slowly and visibly. This page tracks the task evidence and will move when it moves.
Retraining out of a job that is holding up
On this evidence I would not spend money leaving. Spend it on the layer around the job instead: the tools, the paperwork, the planning. That is where the change actually is.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

You are reading the United States figures

The United Kingdom splits this work across more than one official group, of which Specialist medical practitioners and consultants is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United Kingdom page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

Generalist medical practitioners

In UK official statistics this job is counted as Specialist medical practitioners and consultants and Generalist medical practitioners. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

Anywhere in the US:
CareerOneStop - Find local training
Search what's running near you, from the Labor Department's own database, before anyone sells you a course.
Free to search; individual programs vary, and some are funded
Anywhere in the US:
American Job Center locator
An American Job Center will sit down with you for free. Find yours by ZIP code.
Free
- CareerOneStop local help hub
Anywhere in the US:
CareerOneStop - Licensed occupations finder
Check what your state actually requires before you pay for anything.
Free
Anywhere in the US:
CareerOneStop
Free

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for physicians / all other, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 12% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for physicians / all other. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for physicians / all other launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for physicians / all other yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for physicians / all other existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for physicians / all other launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Physicians, All Other?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 101 official task statements scored for Physicians, All Other (United States, SOC 29-1229), 12% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 29 out of 100 (range 24–35, band: low). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Physicians, All Other” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Prepare preventive health reports, including problem descriptions, analyses, alternative solutions, and recommendations” (72/100, high); “Design or use surveillance tools, such as screening, lab reports, and vital records, to identify health risks” (72/100, high); “Document patients' medical histories” (69/100, high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Physicians, All Other” stay human?: About 66% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Examine patients using equipment, such as radiograph (x-ray) machines or fluoroscopes, to determine the nature and extent of disorder or injury” (0/100, minimal); “Perform brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or photodynamic therapy to treat prostate or other cancers” (0/100, minimal); “Perform abdominal, pelvic, or retroperitoneal surgeries” (0/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Physicians, All Other” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 12% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 66% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Physicians, All Other calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 101 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

Worth knowing about these figures

The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
8 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: onet-dbProcessing: catalogue-bridge → onet-im-rt-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: onet-db (im-rt)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-05.
Pay and employment: bls-oews (May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx))bls-oews (May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.