Will AI replace Managers, All Other?

Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 137 official task statements scored for Managers, All Other (United States, SOC 11-9199), 36% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 50 out of 100 (range 44–56, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.

Which tasks in “Managers, All Other” can AI already do?

The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain current knowledge of relevant regulations, including proposed and final rules” (100/100, very high); “Monitor regulatory affairs trends related to environmental issues” (100/100, very high); “Maintain documentation of compliance activities, such as complaints received or investigation outcomes” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.

Which tasks in “Managers, All Other” stay human?

About 36% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Provide expert witness testimony on issues such as soil, air, or water contamination and associated cleanup measures” (0/100, minimal); “Investigate or interview individuals suspected of shoplifting or internal theft” (4/100, minimal); “Coordinate on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects to ensure compliance with environmental laws, standards, regulations, or othe…” (5/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.

What should someone working in “Managers, All Other” do about AI?

Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 36% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 36% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.

How is the AI exposure score for Managers, All Other calculated?

Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 137 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

US dataswitch to UK

Managers, All Other

developing regulatory strategies and implementation plans for the preparation and submission of new products, providing technical support to wind field customers and recruiting or selecting wind operations employees. If that's your week, this page is about your job.

The honest answer

This job is splitting in two: maintaining current knowledge of relevant regulations is work AI now does quickly and cheaply, and representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products is work it can't touch.

Your move: what you can actually do about this ↓

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 36%
changing shape: 29%
staying human: 36%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

Whole-job exposure score 50 out of 100 (44–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, across 137 scored tasks. The number is the support for the sentence above it, not a headline about anyone’s future.

How we know this

What is measured: Every published task statement for managers, all other is rated on five dimensions: can a model produce the output, does the work need a body in a room, does it need a legally accountable person, does it depend on a person being trusted in the moment, and how much data exists. A published formula turns those five ratings into the score; the model never writes the number.

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Which half fills your week decides your exposure. That is more in your control than it sounds.

Your week, as this page understands it

All managers not listed separately. The job title says “managers” or “all other”: officially one job, two names. The real job is the part underneath: representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products. That is the thing someone has to be right about.

The exposed part of this job is specific, and we won’t pretend it is coming back. But managers, all other is not one task. It is 137 scored ones, and they are nowhere near equally exposed. The most durable of them, on this evidence, is representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products, and the ledger below shows exactly why.

Where the work sits, by task weight

shifting to AI: 36%
changing shape: 29%
staying human: 36%

These bars are tasks changing hands, not people being counted out. The ledger below shows which.

How we know this

How the bar is built: Each task’s share of the bar is its published importance weight, so a task you do all day counts for more than one you do twice a year.

Release: 2026-q4.1, scores computed 2026-08-04. Read the full method.

Your job, task by task

These are the official task statements for this occupation, in plain English, sorted by what the evidence says is happening to each one. The official wording sits under every line so you can check the rewrite against it.

20 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Shifting to AI

49 tasks

Tasks today’s tools can already do most of. This is the part we will not soften: where these rows are the bulk of your week, the week changes.

Identifying compliance issues that require follow-up or investigation
This is reading one thing and writing another: compliance issues in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Identify compliance issues that require follow-up or investigation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (62–70 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Spotting which issues need investigating is pattern-finding in records, something software is very good at.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Tracking and maintaining records for wind operations
This is reading one thing and writing another: records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Track and maintain records for wind operations, such as site performance, downtime events, parts usage, or substation events.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turbine performance, downtime and parts data already flow into systems that record and summarise them automatically.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs for environmental cleanup and remediation of land redevelopment projects
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Estimate costs for environmental cleanup and remediation of land redevelopment projects.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Remediation cost estimates are built from published rates and site reports.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining current knowledge of relevant regulations
This is reading one thing and writing another: current knowledge of relevant regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Maintain current knowledge of relevant regulations, including proposed and final rules.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 100 out of 100 (96–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Regulations are published in full, so tracking proposed and final rules is reading and summarising that software does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.

Changing shape

38 tasks

Tasks where the machine takes the producing and a person keeps the checking, the deciding, or the answering-for-it. For most jobs this is the biggest group, and it is where "transformation, not termination" is literally visible.

Developing regulatory strategies and implementation plans for the preparation and submission of new products
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory strategies, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Develop regulatory strategies and implementation plans for the preparation and submission of new products.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: A submission strategy can be drafted from published rules, but shaping it for a specific product needs experienced regulatory judgement.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing all regulatory agency submission materials to ensure timeliness
The software now makes the first pass at all regulatory agency submission materials, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Review all regulatory agency submission materials to ensure timeliness, accuracy, comprehensiveness, or compliance with regulatory standards.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (52–60 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking submission documents against written standards is careful reading, which software does well before a specialist confirms.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the preparation and submission of regulatory agency applications
The software now makes the first pass at the preparation, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct the preparation and submission of regulatory agency applications, reports, or correspondence.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Preparing agency applications and correspondence is structured document work software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Staying human

50 tasks

Tasks that stay with a person, because they happen in the physical world, because the rules need someone accountable, or because the value is that a specific person does them.

Supervising employees or subcontractors to ensure quality of work or adherence to safety regulations or policies
This work happens in the physical world: employees, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Supervise employees or subcontractors to ensure quality of work or adherence to safety regulations or policies.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (3–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising crews on a wind site means being there and having the standing to stop unsafe work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products
This work happens in the physical world: organizations before domestic, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Represent organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Appearing before a regulator on a major decision means a senior person in the room who the agency knows and trusts.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Administering systems and programs to reduce loss
The ratings behind this row put systems well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Administer systems and programs to reduce loss, maintain inventory control, or increase safety.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 37 out of 100 (30–44 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Loss and inventory programmes are increasingly run through systems, though putting them into practice across stores needs people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.

Show the other 127 tasks

Monitoring regulatory affairs trends related to environmental issues
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory affairs trends in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Monitor regulatory affairs trends related to environmental issues.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 100 out of 100 (96–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Environmental regulatory news is published openly, so tracking it is reading and summarising that software does very well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining documentation of compliance activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation of compliance activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Maintain documentation of compliance activities, such as complaints received or investigation outcomes.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping records of complaints and investigation outcomes is routine documentation software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing management reports regarding compliance operations and progress
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: management reports regarding compliance operations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prepare management reports regarding compliance operations and progress.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning compliance activity data into management reports is exactly the kind of writing software does at professional quality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Disseminating written policies and procedures related to compliance activities
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: written policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Disseminate written policies and procedures related to compliance activities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Distributing written policies is routine document handling that software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining databases, bad check logs, reports on multiple offenders and alarm activation lists
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: databases, bad check logs, reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Maintain databases such as bad check logs, reports on multiple offenders, and alarm activation lists.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping logs and offender lists current is straightforward database work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining documentation of all loss prevention activity
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: documentation of all loss prevention activity in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Maintain documentation of all loss prevention activity.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping a record of loss prevention activity is routine documentation software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Analyzing retail data to identify current or emerging trends in theft or fraud
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: retail data in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Analyze retail data to identify current or emerging trends in theft or fraud.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding theft and fraud patterns in retail data is a standard job for analysis software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Maintaining operations records, such as work orders, site inspection forms or other documentation
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: operations records in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Maintain operations records, such as work orders, site inspection forms, or other documentation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Work orders and inspection forms are routine records that systems keep better than paper.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing wind field operational budgets
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: wind field operational budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prepare wind field operational budgets.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building an operating budget from cost and performance figures is number work software does at professional quality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing requests for proposals, RFPs) for wind project construction or equipment acquisition
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: requests in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Prepare requests for proposals (RFPs) for wind project construction or equipment acquisition.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing a request for proposals from known requirements is structured document work software does at professional quality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Updating schedules, estimates, forecasts or budgets for wind projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: schedules, estimates, forecasts or budgets in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Update schedules, estimates, forecasts, or budgets for wind projects.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (89–97 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Updating schedules, forecasts and budgets from current data is exactly what project software does.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring emerging trends regarding industry regulations to determine potential impacts on organizational processes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: trends regarding industry regulations in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Monitor emerging trends regarding industry regulations to determine potential impacts on organizational processes.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 93 out of 100 (86–100 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Watching for regulatory shifts and working out what they mean for the business is reading and analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Keeping informed regarding pending industry changes
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: informed regarding pending industry changes in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Keep informed regarding pending industry changes, trends, or best practices.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 83 out of 100 (79–87 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking rule changes and industry trends uses published material software can gather and summarise well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Maintaining records of decisions, actions and progress related to environmental redevelopment projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: records of decisions, actions and progress in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Maintain records of decisions, actions, and progress related to environmental redevelopment projects.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 81 out of 100 (77–85 allowing for uncertainty): very high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Keeping a record of decisions and progress is structured documentation work software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing reports or presentations to communicate brownfield redevelopment needs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prepare reports or presentations to communicate brownfield redevelopment needs, status, or progress.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 79 out of 100 (75–83 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning project status into reports and presentations is writing software does at professional quality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing communications, securities sales advertising to ensure there are no violations of standards or regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: communications, securities sales in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Review communications such as securities sales advertising to ensure there are no violations of standards or regulations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking advertising copy against published rules is a well-documented text comparison software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Reviewing loss prevention exception reports and cash discrepancies to ensure adherence to guidelines
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: loss prevention exception reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Review loss prevention exception reports and cash discrepancies to ensure adherence to guidelines.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Flagging cash discrepancies and unusual transactions is what exception-reporting software is built to do, with staff reviewing the flags.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and reviewing paperwork procedures and systems to prevent error-related shortages
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: paperwork procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Monitor and review paperwork procedures and systems to prevent error-related shortages.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (68–82 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking paperwork and systems for errors is pattern-spotting in records, which software does faster and more thoroughly.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recommending improvements in loss prevention programs
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: improvements in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Recommend improvements in loss prevention programs, staffing, scheduling, or training.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Recommending programme, staffing and training improvements is analysis and write-up software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying potential for loss and developing strategies to eliminate it
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: potential in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Identify potential for loss and develop strategies to eliminate it.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Finding where losses come from and designing ways to stop them is analysis and planning software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Ordering parts, tools or equipment needed to maintain, restore or improve wind field operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: parts, tools or equipment in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Order parts, tools, or equipment needed to maintain, restore, or improve wind field operations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Ordering parts and tools against known requirements is straightforward purchasing work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Estimating costs associated with operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Estimate costs associated with operations, including repairs or preventive maintenance.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Estimating repair and maintenance costs is calculation from known rates and histories.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing scope of work for wind project functions
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: scope of work in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop scope of work for wind project functions, such as design, site assessment, environmental studies, surveying, or field support services.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing a scope of work from project requirements is document work software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Creating wind energy project plans
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: wind energy project plans in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Create wind energy project plans, including project scope, goals, tasks, resources, schedules, costs, contingencies, or other project information.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a project plan with scope, tasks, schedule and costs is planning work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing materials, marketing literature or user manuals to ensure that regulatory agency requirements are met
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: materials, marketing literature or user manuals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Review materials such as marketing literature or user manuals to ensure that regulatory agency requirements are met.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 75 out of 100 (71–79 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Comparing marketing text and manuals against published requirements is exactly the sort of checking software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 4/4.
Filing appropriate compliance reports with regulatory agencies
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: appropriate compliance reports in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “File appropriate compliance reports with regulatory agencies.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Regulatory filings follow set formats and data, which software assembles reliably before a responsible person signs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing cash audits and depositing investigations to fully account for store cash
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: cash audits in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Perform cash audits and deposit investigations to fully account for store cash.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Cash auditing and deposit reconciliation is arithmetic against records, which software does reliably.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or modifying policies or operating guidelines to comply with changes to environmental standards or regulations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Review or modify policies or operating guidelines to comply with changes to environmental standards or regulations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 69 out of 100 (65–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Updating written guidelines when standards change is text work software does well, with a responsible person approving.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying that software technology is in place to adequately provide oversight and monitoring in all required areas
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: software technology in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Verify that software technology is in place to adequately provide oversight and monitoring in all required areas.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking that the right monitoring software is in place is an inventory and gap check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring compliance systems to ensure their effectiveness
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: compliance systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Monitor compliance systems to ensure their effectiveness.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking whether monitoring systems are actually working is data analysis software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or evaluating proposals or bids to make recommendations regarding awarding of contracts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: proposals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Review or evaluate proposals or bids to make recommendations regarding awarding of contracts.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Comparing bids against criteria and writing a recommendation is analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing wind project documentation, including diagrams or layouts
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: wind project documentation, including diagrams or layouts in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Prepare wind project documentation, including diagrams or layouts.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Producing project documentation, diagrams and layouts is drafting work software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing or evaluating environmental remediation project proposals
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: environmental remediation project proposals in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Review or evaluate environmental remediation project proposals.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Reviewing a remediation proposal against requirements is document analysis software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting feasibility or cost-benefit studies for environmental remediation projects
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: feasibility in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Conduct feasibility or cost-benefit studies for environmental remediation projects.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Feasibility and cost-benefit studies are structured analysis that software performs well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Implementing or monitoring complaint processing systems to ensure effective and timely resolution of all complaint investigations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: complaint processing systems in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Implement or monitor complaint processing systems to ensure effective and timely resolution of all complaint investigations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Complaint tracking systems are largely software already, and monitoring them is data work.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing and maintaining standard operating procedures or local working practices
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: standard operating procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop and maintain standard operating procedures or local working practices.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing and updating standard operating procedures is document work software produces to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing procedures or systems for publishing document submissions in hardcopy or electronic formats
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: procedures in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Establish procedures or systems for publishing document submissions in hardcopy or electronic formats.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting up a document publishing process is procedural work software can specify well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating regulatory affairs aspects that are specifically green
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory affairs aspects in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Evaluate regulatory affairs aspects that are specifically green, such as the use of toxic substances in packaging, carbon footprinting issues, or green policy implementation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assessing packaging substances, carbon footprint and green policy is analysis against published guidance.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring regulatory affairs activities to ensure their alignment with corporate sustainability or green initiatives
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: regulatory affairs activities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Monitor regulatory affairs activities to ensure their alignment with corporate sustainability or green initiatives.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking regulatory work against sustainability goals is a documentary comparison software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying that all regulatory policies and procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: all regulatory policies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Verify that all regulatory policies and procedures have been documented, implemented, and communicated.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Checking that policies exist, are in force and have been communicated is a records check software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing risk management strategies based on assessment of product
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: risk management strategies in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Develop risk management strategies based on assessment of product, compliance, or operational risks.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 66 out of 100 (59–73 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Building a risk strategy from an assessment of known risks is analysis and write-up software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing verbal or written project status reports to project teams
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: verbal in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide verbal or written project status reports to project teams, management, subcontractors, customers, or owners.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 65 out of 100 (58–72 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Status reports write themselves from project data, though difficult news still lands better in person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 4/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising retail establishments on development of loss-investigation procedures
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: retail establishments in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Advise retail establishments on development of loss-investigation procedures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing investigation procedures for a retailer is document work software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing goals, objectives or priorities for wind field operations
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: goals, objectives or priorities in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Establish goals, objectives, or priorities for wind field operations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting operational goals and priorities is planning from performance data, which software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing wind project costs to stay within budget limits
shifting to AI
This is reading one thing and writing another: wind project costs in, a record out. That is the shape today's tools are built for.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Manage wind project costs to stay within budget limits.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 64 out of 100 (57–71 allowing for uncertainty): high exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Tracking project spend against budget is number work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reporting violations of compliance or regulatory standards to duly authorized enforcement agencies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at violations of compliance, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 5 · Core
Source: “Report violations of compliance or regulatory standards to duly authorized enforcement agencies as appropriate or required.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Preparing and filing a violation report is documentation, though a responsible person must stand behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing assistance to internal or external auditors in compliance reviews
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at assistance, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide assistance to internal or external auditors in compliance reviews.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Assembling evidence for auditors is document retrieval and preparation, which software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Designing or implementing improvements in communication
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at improvements, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Design or implement improvements in communication, monitoring, or enforcement of compliance standards.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Designing better monitoring and communication is design work software drafts to a usable standard.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting periodic internal reviews or audits to ensure that compliance procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at periodic internal reviews, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Conduct periodic internal reviews or audits to ensure that compliance procedures are followed.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Internal audits compare practice against written procedure, which software supports well, with a responsible person concluding.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Performing or directing inventory investigations in response to shrink results outside of acceptable ranges
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at inventory investigations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Perform or direct inventory investigations in response to shrink results outside of acceptable ranges.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Chasing down why stock does not add up is mostly data investigation, with occasional counting in the store.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing loss prevention audit programs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at loss prevention audit programs, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct loss prevention audit programs including target store audits, maintenance audits, safety audits, or electronic article surveillance (EAS) audits.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Directing an audit programme is mostly planning and reviewing results, which software supports well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Assessing security needs across locations to ensure proper deployment of loss prevention resources
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at security needs across locations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Assess security needs across locations to ensure proper deployment of loss prevention resources, such as staff and technology.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Working out where to put staff and cameras across sites is an allocation problem software solves well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising retail managers on compliance with applicable codes
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at retail managers, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Advise retail managers on compliance with applicable codes, laws, regulations, or standards.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advising on codes and regulations is guidance drawn from published rules, which software drafts well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring compliance to operational, safety or inventory control procedures, including physical security standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at compliance, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Monitor compliance to operational, safety, or inventory control procedures, including physical security standards.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Monitoring whether procedures are followed is largely a matter of checking system data and reports.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Monitoring and maintaining records of daily facility operations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at records of daily facility operations, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Monitor and maintain records of daily facility operations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Operational records are largely automatic once data is collected, though some checks are made around the site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing civil design, engineering or construction technical documentation to ensure compliance with applicable government or industrial codes, standards, requirements or regulations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at civil design, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Review civil design, engineering, or construction technical documentation to ensure compliance with applicable government or industrial codes, standards, requirements, or regulations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Checking technical documents against codes and standards is a text comparison software does well, with a qualified reviewer confirming.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing or assisting in the preparation of applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the preparation of applications, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Prepare or assist in the preparation of applications for environmental, building, or other required permits.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Permit applications follow set formats and published requirements, though a responsible person must submit them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Preparing and submitting permit applications
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at permit applications, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Prepare and submit permit applications for demolition, cleanup, remediation, or construction projects.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Permit applications follow published formats and requirements, though a responsible person must submit them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting quantitative risk assessments for human health
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at quantitative risk assessments, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Conduct quantitative risk assessments for human health, environmental, or other risks.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Quantitative risk assessment follows published methods and models, which software applies reliably before a qualified reviewer signs.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Formulating or implementing regulatory affairs policies and procedures to ensure that regulatory compliance
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory affairs policies, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Formulate or implement regulatory affairs policies and procedures to ensure that regulatory compliance is maintained or enhanced.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Writing regulatory policies and procedures is document work software drafts well, with a specialist approving.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Communicating regulatory information to multiple departments and ensuring that information is interpreted correctly
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory information, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Communicate regulatory information to multiple departments and ensure that information is interpreted correctly.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Turning regulations into clear notes for different departments is explanation work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Establishing regulatory priorities or budgets and allocate resources and workloads
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory priorities, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Establish regulatory priorities or budgets and allocate resources and workloads.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Setting priorities and allocating workload is planning from known capacity and deadlines.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Investigating product complaints and preparing documentation and submissions to appropriate regulatory agencies
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at product complaints, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Investigate product complaints and prepare documentation and submissions to appropriate regulatory agencies as necessary.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Turning a complaint into a documented submission is writing from records, though a qualified person signs it off.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating new software publishing systems and conferring with regulatory agencies concerning news or updates on electronic publishing of submissions
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at new software publishing systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Evaluate new software publishing systems and confer with regulatory agencies concerning news or updates on electronic publishing of submissions.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Evaluating publishing systems and checking agency updates is research and comparison work software does well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising technical professionals on the development or use of environmental compliance or reporting tools
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical professionals, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Advise technical professionals on the development or use of environmental compliance or reporting tools.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Advising on environmental reporting tools is technical guidance drawn from documented options.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Evaluating testing procedures to meet the specifications of environmental monitoring programs
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at procedures, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Evaluate testing procedures to meet the specifications of environmental monitoring programs.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Comparing testing procedures against programme specifications is a documented technical check.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing documentation efforts to ensure compliance with domestic and international regulations and standards
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at documentation efforts, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct documentation efforts to ensure compliance with domestic and international regulations and standards.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Making sure documentation meets domestic and international standards is a checking task suited to software.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Overseeing internal reporting systems, such as corporate compliance hotlines
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at internal reporting systems, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Oversee internal reporting systems, such as corporate compliance hotlines.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 56 out of 100 (49–63 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Running a reporting hotline system is largely case management, which software handles well.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Identifying, and applying forring project funding
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at project, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Identify and apply for project funding.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 49 out of 100 (42–56 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Funding applications can be drafted well, but tailoring them to a particular funder's priorities still needs real editing.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing technical support to wind field customers
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at technical support, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide technical support to wind field customers, employees, or subcontractors.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Technical support draws on documented equipment knowledge, which software handles well for common problems.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Managing warranty repair or replacement services
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at warranty repair, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Manage warranty repair or replacement services.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Warranty claims follow set contract rules, so the paperwork and tracking are highly automatable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing regulatory guidance to departments or development project teams regarding design
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at regulatory guidance, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide regulatory guidance to departments or development project teams regarding design, development, evaluation, or marketing of products.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Guidance to project teams is drawn from published rules, so software drafts it well before a specialist checks it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing responses to regulatory agencies regarding product information or issues
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at responses, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide responses to regulatory agencies regarding product information or issues.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Responses to a regulator are written documents, though a named accountable person has to stand behind every word.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Directing the development or implementation of policies and procedures related to compliance throughout an organization
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the development, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Direct the development or implementation of policies and procedures related to compliance throughout an organization.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 48 out of 100 (41–55 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Policy drafting is very automatable, though rolling it out across an organisation needs an accountable person leading it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing employee training on compliance related topics
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at employee, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide employee training on compliance related topics, policies, or procedures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training content is easy to produce, though people absorb compliance messages better from a person who answers questions.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training staff in regulatory policies or procedures
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at staff, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Train staff in regulatory policies or procedures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training material writes itself easily, but staff take rules more seriously from someone they know is accountable.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Discussing emerging compliance issues to ensure that management and employees are informed about compliance reporting systems
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at compliance issues, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Discuss emerging compliance issues to ensure that management and employees are informed about compliance reporting systems, policies, and practices.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 46 out of 100 (39–53 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Briefing notes are easy to write, but people take compliance messages seriously from a person they know.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Developing processes or procedures for wind operations
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at processes, but the deciding part still needs a person. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop processes or procedures for wind operations, including transitioning from construction to commercial operations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 44 out of 100 (37–51 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Writing operating procedures for a specific site depends on local detail that rarely exists in any document.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Reviewing or evaluating designs for contaminant treatment or disposal facilities
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at designs, but someone has to be answerable for the result, and it cannot be the software. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Review or evaluate designs for contaminant treatment or disposal facilities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 43 out of 100 (36–50 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Software can check a design against standards, but formally approving treatment facilities needs a qualified engineer's judgement and responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Contributing to the development or implementation of business unit strategic and operating plans
changing shape
The software now makes the first pass at the development, but the part that matters is a person saying it and standing behind it. So the job becomes checking and deciding rather than producing.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Contribute to the development or implementation of business unit strategic and operating plans.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 40 out of 100 (33–47 allowing for uncertainty): partial exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contributing to strategic plans happens in discussion where people argue for priorities and reach agreement together.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Advising internal management or business partners on the implementation or operation of compliance programs
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for internal management, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Advise internal management or business partners on the implementation or operation of compliance programs.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Advice can be drafted from written rules, but managers act on it when a trusted specialist stands behind it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training loss prevention staff, retail managers or storing employees on loss control and prevention measures
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles loss prevention staff, retail managers or storing employees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Train loss prevention staff, retail managers, or store employees on loss control and prevention measures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training material is easy to produce, though staff learn loss-prevention habits better from someone in the store.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Reviewing, negotiating or approving wind farm contracts
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for wind farm contracts, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Review, negotiate, or approve wind farm contracts.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 39 out of 100 (32–46 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract review is strong AI territory, but negotiating and approving them commits the company and needs an accountable person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Training or coordinating the training of employees in operations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles the training of employees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Train or coordinate the training of employees in operations, safety, environmental issues, or technical issues.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 34 out of 100 (27–41 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: reading one thing and writing another; the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Training content is easy to produce, though safety training on a live site works better delivered by a person.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 3/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating the disposal of hazardous waste
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the disposal of hazardous waste, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate the disposal of hazardous waste.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Hazardous waste disposal follows documented rules, but the handling and transfer involve licensed operators and real material.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating internal discoveries and depositions with legal department staff
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for internal discoveries, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Coordinate internal discoveries and depositions with legal department staff.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 32 out of 100 (25–39 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating discovery and depositions with lawyers means working alongside legal staff who carry the responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Participating in the development or implementation of clinical trial protocols
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the development, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Participate in the development or implementation of clinical trial protocols.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 31 out of 100 (24–38 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Trial protocols can be drafted from templates, but they must be developed under qualified clinical and regulatory responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Verifying correct use and maintenance of physical security systems
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: correct use and maintenance of physical security systems, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Verify correct use and maintenance of physical security systems, such as closed-circuit television, merchandise tags, and burglar alarms.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 29 out of 100 (22–36 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Cameras and alarms report their own status, but confirming they are used and maintained properly means visiting them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Recruiting or selecting wind operations employees
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles wind operations employees and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Recruit or select wind operations employees, contractors, or subcontractors.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Choosing employees and subcontractors rests on judging people, which happens in conversation.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing or implementing plans for the sustainable regeneration of brownfield sites to ensure regeneration of a wider area by providing environmental protection or economic and social benefits
staying human
The ratings behind this row put plans well outside what today's tools can do on their own.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop or implement plans for the sustainable regeneration of brownfield sites to ensure regeneration of a wider area by providing environmental protection or economic and social benefits.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 28 out of 100 (21–35 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch.
The rating behind it: Wider regeneration plans depend on local economic and social knowledge that is rarely written down anywhere.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Consulting with corporate attorneys as necessary to address difficult legal compliance issues
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for corporate attorneys, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Consult with corporate attorneys as necessary to address difficult legal compliance issues.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Difficult legal questions are worked through in conversation with a lawyer who carries the professional responsibility.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with human resources departments to ensure the implementation of consistent disciplinary action strategies in cases of compliance standard violations
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for human resources departments, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Collaborate with human resources departments to ensure the implementation of consistent disciplinary action strategies in cases of compliance standard violations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 26 out of 100 (19–33 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Consistent discipline decisions are worked out with HR case by case, weighing details rarely written down.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Overseeing the maintenance of wind field equipment or structures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the maintenance of wind field equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Oversee the maintenance of wind field equipment or structures, such as towers, transformers, electrical collector systems, roadways, or other site assets.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 25 out of 100 (18–32 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Overseeing maintenance of towers, transformers and roads means being on site as well as tracking the schedule.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Negotiating contracts for services or materials needed for environmental remediation
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles contracts and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Negotiate contracts for services or materials needed for environmental remediation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (17–31 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Contract terms are settled by people negotiating, where knowing the other side matters.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing relationships with state or federal environmental regulatory agencies to learn about and analyzing the potential impacts of proposed environmental policy regulations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Develop relationships with state or federal environmental regulatory agencies to learn about and analyze the potential impacts of proposed environmental policy regulations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 24 out of 100 (20–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Building a working relationship with a regulator depends on people who know and trust each other over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Coordinating theft and fraud investigations involving career criminals or organized group activities
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles theft and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate theft and fraud investigations involving career criminals or organized group activities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Organised theft cases turn on informal intelligence and trusted contacts more than on recorded data.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating or conducting internal investigations of problems
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles internal investigations of problems and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate or conduct internal investigations of problems such as employee theft and violations of corporate loss prevention policies.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Internal theft investigations depend on people talking candidly, which happens with someone they can look in the eye.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Collaborating with law enforcement to investigate and solve external theft or fraud cases
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles law enforcement and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Collaborate with law enforcement to investigate and solve external theft or fraud cases.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Working a case with police depends on trusted contacts and information shared between people.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating or directing development, energy assessment, engineering or construction activities to ensure that wind project needs and objectives are met
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles development, energy assessment, engineering or construction activities and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate or direct development, energy assessment, engineering, or construction activities to ensure that wind project needs and objectives are met.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Keeping engineering, assessment and construction aligned happens through people coordinating with each other as things change.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing or implementing plans for surface or ground water remediation
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for plans, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Design or implement plans for surface or ground water remediation.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 23 out of 100 (16–30 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Water remediation designs must be produced or directly supervised by a qualified professional who is accountable for them.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing or implementing plans for revegetation of brownfield sites
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Develop or implement plans for revegetation of brownfield sites.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Revegetation planning depends on local soil and climate detail, and the planting itself happens on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Conducting environmental audits to ensure adherence to environmental standards
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental audits, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Supplemental
Source: “Conduct environmental audits to ensure adherence to environmental standards.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 22 out of 100 (15–29 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: An environmental audit means visiting the site and seeing conditions, not just reading records.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Providing recommendations and solutions in crisis situations
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles recommendations and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Provide recommendations and solutions in crisis situations such as workplace violence, protests, and demonstrations.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Crisis advice matters most when a trusted person is there to give it while things are happening.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing technical support for the design
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: technical support, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Provide technical support for the design, construction, or commissioning of wind farm projects.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 21 out of 100 (14–28 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Supporting design, construction and commissioning often means being on site when problems arise.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Conducting or directing the internal investigation of compliance issues
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for the internal investigation of compliance issues, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Conduct or direct the internal investigation of compliance issues.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 20 out of 100 (13–27 allowing for uncertainty): low exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: An internal investigation depends on people talking honestly to someone they trust, and a responsible person owning the findings.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising surveillance, detection or criminal processing related to theft and criminal cases
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: surveillance, detection or criminal, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Supervise surveillance, detection, or criminal processing related to theft and criminal cases.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Overseeing surveillance and criminal processing mixes system monitoring with being present when things happen.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing site assessments or environmental studies for wind fields
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: site assessments, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Manage site assessments or environmental studies for wind fields.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Site assessments and environmental studies mean qualified people out in the field taking real measurements.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Identifying environmental contamination sources
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental contamination sources, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Identify environmental contamination sources.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Finding where contamination came from needs samples and site investigation as well as desk analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing or conducting environmental restoration studies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental restoration studies, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Design or conduct environmental restoration studies.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 19 out of 100 (12–26 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Restoration studies need fieldwork and sampling as well as desk analysis.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Planning or implementing brownfield redevelopment projects to ensure safety
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: brownfield redevelopment projects, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Plan or implement brownfield redevelopment projects to ensure safety, quality, and compliance with applicable standards or requirements.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Redevelopment planning is desk work, but delivering it safely and to standard happens on the actual site.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing or implementing plans for structural demolition and debris removal
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: plans, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Design or implement plans for structural demolition and debris removal.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Demolition plans must be produced under qualified engineering responsibility and carried out on the real structure.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Designing or implementing measures to improve the water
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: measures, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Design or implement measures to improve the water, air, and soil quality of military test sites, abandoned mine land, or other contaminated sites.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Designing and carrying out site clean-up measures needs qualified professionals and real work on contaminated ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 3/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Managing activities, audits, regulatory agency inspections or product recalls
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: activities, audits, regulatory agency inspections or product recalls, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Manage activities such as audits, regulatory agency inspections, or product recalls.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Running an audit, inspection or recall involves being on site and coordinating people as well as paperwork.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Directing environmental programs, such as air or water compliance
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: environmental programs, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Direct environmental programs, such as air or water compliance, aboveground or underground storage tanks, spill prevention or control, hazardous waste or materials management, solid waste recycling, medical waste management, indoor air quality, integrated pest management, employee training, or disaster preparedness.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 16 out of 100 (9–23 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Directing environmental programmes covers real sites, tanks and waste, so much of it happens on the ground.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Supervising the work of subcontractors or consultants to ensure quality and conformance to specifications or budgets
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: the work of subcontractors, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Supervise the work of subcontractors or consultants to ensure quality and conformance to specifications or budgets.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Supervising subcontractors means being on site and having the standing to insist on quality.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Leading or supporting negotiations involving tax agreements or abatements
staying human
The rules require a named, qualified person to answer for negotiations involving tax agreements, and that person cannot be a piece of software.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Lead or support negotiations involving tax agreements or abatements, power purchase agreements, land use, or interconnection agreements.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (11–19 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Land, tax and power purchase deals are settled by people negotiating with each other and committing their organisations.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Providing training on hazardous material or waste cleanup procedures and technologies
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: hazardous material, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Provide training on hazardous material or waste cleanup procedures and technologies.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 15 out of 100 (8–22 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the same decision, made over and over; work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Hazardous waste training needs practical demonstration and a trainer in the room, though materials can be drafted.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 2/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 3/4.
Hiring or supervising loss prevention staff
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles loss prevention staff and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Hire or supervise loss prevention staff.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 13 out of 100 (9–17 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Hiring and leading a security team rests on personal judgement about people and the relationship that follows.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Visiting stores to ensure compliance with company policies and procedures
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: stores, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Visit stores to ensure compliance with company policies and procedures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 11 out of 100 (4–18 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, medium confidence.
Why it sits in this group: mistakes that are cheap to catch; work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: A store visit is exactly that: someone walking the shop floor and seeing how it is actually run.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 2/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Developing and maintaining partnerships with federal
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles partnerships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop and maintain partnerships with federal, state, or local law enforcement agencies or members of the retail loss prevention community.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Useful police and industry contacts come from relationships built between people over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Developing relationships and communicating with customers
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles relationships and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Develop relationships and communicate with customers, site managers, developers, land owners, authorities, utility representatives, or residents.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 10 out of 100 (6–14 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Landowners, residents and utility contacts deal with a person they know and trust, built up over time.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 1/4 · needs an accountable person 0/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 3/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Serving as a confidential point of contact for employees to communicate with management
staying human
The value here is that a specific person handles a confidential point of contact and stands behind it. That is earned, not computed.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Serve as a confidential point of contact for employees to communicate with management, seek clarification on issues or dilemmas, or report irregularities.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 9 out of 100 (5–13 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Being a confidential sounding board only works if a real person is there to be trusted with something difficult.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 0/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 4/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Directing installation of covert surveillance equipment
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: installation of covert surveillance equipment, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Core
Source: “Direct installation of covert surveillance equipment, such as security cameras.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 7 out of 100 (3–11 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world.
The rating behind it: Installing covert cameras means someone physically fitting equipment in the right places.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Inspecting sites to assess environmental damage or monitor cleanup progress
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: sites, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Inspect sites to assess environmental damage or monitor cleanup progress.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 6 out of 100 (2–10 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Assessing damage or checking cleanup progress means walking the site and seeing it.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 0/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Coordinating on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects to ensure compliance with environmental laws
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: on-site activities, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Coordinate on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects to ensure compliance with environmental laws, standards, regulations, or other requirements.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 5 out of 100 (1–9 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it.
The rating behind it: Coordinating a cleanup on site means someone physically there while the work is happening.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 2/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 1/4 · how much data exists 2/4.
Investigating or interviewing individuals suspected of shoplifting or internal theft
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: individuals suspected, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 4 · Core
Source: “Investigate or interview individuals suspected of shoplifting or internal theft.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 4 out of 100 (0–8 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Questioning someone suspected of theft is a face-to-face situation needing careful judgement in the moment.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 1/4 · needs a body in a room 3/4 · needs an accountable person 1/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 1/4.
Providing expert witness testimony on issues
staying human
This work happens in the physical world: expert witness testimony, in a real place. Software cannot follow it there.
importance 3 · Supplemental
Source: “Provide expert witness testimony on issues such as soil, air, or water contamination and associated cleanup measures.” (O*NET task statement)
How this row was scored
Exposure score: 0 out of 100 (0–4 allowing for uncertainty): minimal exposure, high confidence.
Why it sits in this group: work that happens in the physical world; someone qualified has to answer for it; the value is that a specific person does it.
The rating behind it: Expert testimony means a specific qualified person appearing and answering questions under oath.
The five ratings: output a model can produce 0/4 · needs a body in a room 4/4 · needs an accountable person 4/4 · needs to be trusted in the moment 2/4 · how much data exists 2/4.

What this job pays, and how many people do it

Median pay: $141,900a year, the middle of the range, so half earn more and half earn less.bls-oews, 2025 · May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx)
How we know this
Source: bls-oews
Reference period: May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx)
Rounding: Shown as published.
People doing this job: 622,190in the US, 2025.bls-oews · May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx)

What is deliberately not here: a forecast of how many of these jobs exist in ten years. Where an official projection exists for a market we publish it with its vintage; where it does not, we leave the space empty rather than borrow the other country’s number.

Why this is shifting

The reason is boringly specific. Most of what is shifting here is reading one thing and writing another: current knowledge of relevant regulations in, a record out. The rows above are exactly that shape: maintaining current knowledge of relevant regulations and identifying compliance issues that require follow-up or investigation. What it cannot do is be answerable: organizations before domestic needs a named person the rules will accept, and software cannot be that person. Which is why this page talks about your tasks changing, not your job ending.

Your move

Over a pint: what I’d tell you if you were my friend

Your week is splitting in two, and which half fills it is the whole question. Maintaining current knowledge of relevant regulations is going; representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products is not.

So, given all that: 36% of this job's task weight sits in rows the software is already learning, 29% in rows that change shape rather than disappear, and 36% in rows it is nowhere near. That is the position, measured across 137 scored tasks. It is not a forecast about you.

The occupation is an average and you are not, so the first job below is finding out where your own week actually sits.

This week: one thing

Print the task ledger above and put your own hours next to each row. Roughly, in pen, in one sitting. Then look at which group your hours actually pile up in. Twenty minutes, this week.

What you end up holding: your own week, on one page, sorted into what is shifting and what is not
How long it takes: about twenty minutes

If printing it isn’t practical: Read the rows off this page and write the same list on the back of an envelope. Same twenty minutes, same page, and it works just as well said out loud to someone who knows the job. The point is your hours next to the rows, not the paper it is on.

Over the next 90 days

Volunteer toward the durable end, visibly. Over the next ninety days put your hand up for the work in the bottom group (representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products) and let people see you doing it. Not a new project: the same job, with your mix deliberately tilted. The point is that when the rota or the reorganisation comes, the version of you people picture is the one doing the part that stays.

Over the next 12 months

Claim a specialism at the durable end and let the other end go. Over a year, deliberately become the person who handles representing organizations before domestic or international regulatory agencies on major policy matters or decisions regarding company products, and deliberately stop being the first choice for the rows in the top group. That trade costs something, because the exposed work is often the comfortable work. Decide it on purpose rather than by drift. Before you pay for anything, use CareerOneStop - Find local training. It is free, it is the Labor Department's own service, and it is listed below with the rest of the free routes.

The roads out of here, and why I am not sending you down them

I looked at the obvious moves out of this job, and here is what I found.

I checked the 12 nearest US occupations to managers, all other (nearest by the work that AI is not taking, not by job title), and none of them survived. The closest was compliance officers: only about 4% of its durable work is work you already do and it pays 43.1% less. Your own job splits about 36/64: that share of the list sits in the top exposure band and the rest does not. On this evidence the honest move is inside the job rather than out of it. Become the person who owns “develop regulatory strategies and implementation plans for the preparation and submission of…”, and let the exposed end go.

How that was checked: this job was compared against all 830 US occupations in this release on their official task statements, and the 12 nearest were examined one by one. A move that turns on an industry, an employer or a qualification rather than on the work itself will not show up in a check like that. And this release carries no licence register, so anything you are weighing needs that looked up separately.

3 moves I checked and rejected

These are the obvious-looking jumps. They are here with their reasons rather than quietly dropped, because the ones that fail are worth knowing about. It is one less thing to turn over at night.

Compliance Officers
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already develop regulatory strategies and implementation plans for the preparation and submission of new…, and their equivalent is to communicate with regulatory agencies regarding pre-submission strategies, potential regulatory pathways, compliance test requirements…. Across both published task lists that is about 4% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 4% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: $80,730 against your $141,900, 43.1% less (OEWS May 2025 (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Protective Service Workers, All Other
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already verify correct use and maintenance of physical security systems, and their equivalent is to verify proper functioning of physical security systems. Across both published task lists that is about 3% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 3% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: $42,540 against your $141,900, 70.0% less (OEWS May 2025 (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 81,500 of those jobs against 622,190 of yours (OEWS May 2025), 13% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →
Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health
Why it looked obvious: It came up as a near neighbour on the work AI is not taking: you already coordinate on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects to ensure compliance with…, and their equivalent is to inspect active remediation sites to ensure compliance with environmental or safety policies, standards…. Across both published task lists that is about 2% of the durable work in that job.
Why I am not recommending it: Almost none of it is work you already do: about 2% of the durable side of that job. That is a different job, not a next step. It is a pay cut, in those words: $82,220 against your $141,900, 42.1% less (OEWS May 2025 (both)). Retraining to earn less is a decision, not advice. And it is a narrow door: about 89,250 of those jobs against 622,190 of yours (OEWS May 2025), 14% as many seats.
Look at that job’s page anyway →

What I’d stop worrying about

A friend tells you what not to spend fear on. This is that list.

The headline number you read somewhere
The big “X% of jobs” figures are about the whole economy, not about you. The number that describes your job is on this page: 36% of its task weight, across 137 scored tasks. Every row behind it is printed above with the source. Check ours; ignore theirs.
The whole-job doom story
Nothing on this page says this job ends. It says the mix inside it moves. Half the rows above are unchanged or changing shape, and the plan is about which half your week sits in. That is a very different problem, and a solvable one.
Panic-buying a course
Do the twenty-minute sorting exercise first. Most people who buy a course before they have done it buy the wrong one, and the free services listed below will tell you the same thing without charging for it.
The “obvious” next job everyone suggests
I checked the obvious moves and most of them did not survive. The reasons are printed with the routes above, including the pay and the gate. A move that fails on the numbers is worth knowing about so you can stop turning it over at night.

If you run a team doing this job

If you run a team doing this job, the conversation you owe them is the one on this page, and sooner than feels comfortable. Show them the ledger rather than a reassurance: the rows moving toward the software are maintaining current knowledge of relevant regulations, and the rows that are not are where you want your people visible. Ask each of them to do the this-week move and bring the list to your next one-to-one. It turns a rumour into a piece of work, and it tells you which parts of your team's week are actually at stake. And say the thing out loud that a team lead usually leaves unsaid: a shrinking team is your exposure too, so do the move yourself as well.

You are reading the United States figures

The United Kingdom splits this work across more than one official group, of which Senior officers in fire, ambulance, prison and related services is the closest. The pay and employment figures are not directly comparable, and we do not average them together.

Switch to the United Kingdom page →partial match

The other groups this work is counted across:

In UK official statistics this job is counted as Senior officers in fire, ambulance, prison and related services, Garage managers and proprietors, Hairdressing and beauty salon managers and proprietors, Travel agency managers and proprietors, Hire services managers and proprietors, Leisure and sports managers and proprietors, Managers and proprietors in other services n.e.c. and Charitable organisation managers and directors. Pay is shown separately for each of those groups (medians cannot be averaged together), while the task list and the scores on this page are for this group only.

Your route through this

Where to go next, and what it costs

Free, and complete

The moves above cost nothing. These are the real services that go with them: public, government-funded, and free at the point of use. Nothing on this page is behind an email address or a payment.

Anywhere in the US:
CareerOneStop - Find local training
Search what's running near you, from the Labor Department's own database, before anyone sells you a course.
Free to search; individual programs vary, and some are funded
Anywhere in the US:
American Job Center locator
An American Job Center will sit down with you for free. Find yours by ZIP code.
Free
- CareerOneStop local help hub
Anywhere in the US:
CareerOneStop - Licensed occupations finder
Check what your state actually requires before you pay for anything.
Free
Anywhere in the US:
CareerOneStop
Free

No Space for this job, but one for what is happening to it

Nothing Collab365 runs is built for managers / all other, and we are not going to point you at the nearest one and call it a fit.

There is one that is not about a job title at all. The AI Authority is about being the person who directs these tools at work rather than the person they get compared to. That is worth saying here, because 36% of the work on this page is already inside what they can do.

Try The AI Authority free →

7 days free, no card needed. Explore up to 2 Spaces before you choose a plan: you pick a plan later, not now.

The AI Authority is a general community about working with AI, not a course for managers / all other. You do not need it to act on anything here: the moves above cost nothing and stand on their own. The data on this page is the same either way.

Noted, and thank you. We’ll email you if a Space for managers / all other launches. Nothing else.

That did not look like an email address, so nothing was saved. Have another go below.

We could not save that. The fault is ours, not yours, and your address was not stored. Please try again later.

No Space for managers / all other yet. Should there be one?

Collab365 Spaces is built by the same people as this site. We find the problems that AI and automation are creating inside one kind of work, then solve them as short courses, briefings and Blueprints. Each Space is the community too, so the research and the people doing your job are in the same place.

What a Space actually is, in full

Collab365 launches new communities where the need is real. If one for managers / all other existed, with researched problems, courses and people in the same boat, would you want in?

Your email

We use your email address for one thing: to tell you if a Space for managers / all other launches. We never sell it, never use it for unrelated marketing, and every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Our privacy policy has the full version.

This unlocks nothing. Every figure, every row and every step on this page is already yours, whether you fill this in or not.

No deadline on any of this. The page will still be here, and the data is refreshed on a published schedule rather than when someone wants a headline.

Questions people ask about this job

Will AI replace Managers, All Other?: Not as a job, but it is already doing parts of the work. Across the 137 official task statements scored for Managers, All Other (United States, SOC 11-9199), 36% of the importance-weighted core work is made of tasks today's AI could already do most of. The overall exposure score is 50 out of 100 (range 44–56, band: partial). That is a statement about tasks, not about headcount: this measures what AI could do, not whether any employer adopts it, whether the law allows it, or whether doing the routine parts faster creates more demand for the human parts. Figures are from release 2026-q4.1.
Which tasks in “Managers, All Other” can AI already do?: The highest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Maintain current knowledge of relevant regulations, including proposed and final rules” (100/100, very high); “Monitor regulatory affairs trends related to environmental issues” (100/100, very high); “Maintain documentation of compliance activities, such as complaints received or investigation outcomes” (93/100, very high). Each score comes from five published 0–4 ratings turned into a number by a published formula, and each carries the model's one-sentence reason on the page.
Which tasks in “Managers, All Other” stay human?: About 36% of this job's task weight sits in work that scores low for AI exposure. The lowest-scoring tasks in release 2026-q4.1 are: “Provide expert witness testimony on issues such as soil, air, or water contamination and associated cleanup measures” (0/100, minimal); “Investigate or interview individuals suspected of shoplifting or internal theft” (4/100, minimal); “Coordinate on-site activities for environmental cleanup or remediation projects to ensure compliance with environmental laws, standards, regulations, or othe…” (5/100, minimal). Low scores usually mean the task needs a body in a room, a legally accountable human, or trust built in real time. Those are the three things the scoring rubric treats as gates rather than obstacles.
What should someone working in “Managers, All Other” do about AI?: Start from the ledger rather than the headline: 36% of this job's weighted core work is exposed, and roughly 36% is not. The practical move is to spend more of your week on the tasks that score low, the ones above, and to get fluent at directing AI through the tasks that score high, because those are the parts that change whether or not you are ready for them. This page does not predict your job, and nothing here is career advice tailored to you: the score describes the occupation, not the person.
How is the AI exposure score for Managers, All Other calculated?: Each official task statement for the occupation is rated on five published 0–4 dimensions (output replicability, physical embodiment, licensed accountability, real-time human trust, and data availability) by claude-opus-5 using scoring prompt task_scoring_v1.0. The model never writes the score; a published formula turns the five ratings into a 0–100 number, so every score can be recomputed by hand. The occupation figure is the importance-weighted mean across 137 scored tasks. The prompt, the rubric, the formula and the full dataset are published at https://futureproof.collab365.com/method and https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1 under CC BY 4.0.

Where these numbers come from

Worth knowing about these figures

The match between this job and its counterpart in the other country is partial, so the two pages count slightly different groups of people.
20 of this occupation's scored task statements carry a score that was measured under a different occupation's context, because the statement is shared between jobs and has only been scored once so far. Each one names the occupation it was measured under in the free routes below; none is presented as a measurement for this job.
Task clusters are not derived in this release, so the task-cluster field is empty and no Collab365 Space routing is attached to this occupation yet.

Task statements: onet-dbProcessing: catalogue-bridge → onet-im-rt-weighting → task-scoring → score-aggregation
Task weights: onet-db (im-rt)
Scores: Rubric task_scoring_v1.0, model claude-opus-5, computed 2026-08-04.
Pay and employment: bls-oews (May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx))bls-oews (May 2025 estimates (national_M2025_dl.xlsx))

Figures on this page come from release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Every release keeps its own permanent address, so a figure you cite in March is still there, unchanged, in November.

The plain-English wording on this page is assembled directly from the task statements and the published ratings, not written by hand for this occupation. That is why it is specific, and it is also why we say so.

The routes and free resources further up are today’s, not the release’s (last reviewed 2026-08-05). A route is an offer, not a historical fact, so it moves on its own clock.

How we score a job Download this release Look up another job

Using these figures?

Cite this

Everything on this site is published under CC BY 4.0. Quote it, chart it, sell something built on it. Just say where it came from, and cite the dated release rather than the site, so the figure you quote stays checkable.

Plain text

Collab365 (2026). Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1 (methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0). https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Built with O*NET data (USDOL/ETA, CC BY 4.0); ONS data (Open Government Licence v3.0); GAISI task framework (arXiv:2507.22748, MIT); BLS data (public domain).

BibTeX

@misc{collab365futureproof2026q41,
  title        = {Collab365 Futureproof: task-level AI exposure for US and UK occupations, release 2026-q4.1},
  author       = {{Collab365}},
  year         = {2026},
  url          = {https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1},
  note         = {Release 2026-q4.1, methodVersion 2.0.0, promptVersion task_scoring_v1.0, CC BY 4.0}
}

Permalink

https://futureproof.collab365.com/data/2026-q4.1

Data as of release 2026-q4.1, published 2026-08-05. Releases never change after publication; when the figures move, a new dated release is published beside this one and this one stays exactly where it is.